Professional Documents
Culture Documents
are made to correct presbyopia (the loss of focusing flexibility that hits all of us in our early
40s). Presbyopia occurs in all of us in a relatively equal way, so making a standardized power
for presbyopia is easy.
Basically, the cheater readers are making the assumption that the wearer has perfect
distance vision, and simply brings the focal point forward to a comfortable reading distance.
Now, plus power lenses that correct for presbyopia also happen to help with hyperopia.
However, unless your hyperopia just coincidentally happens to be equal between your eyes,
free of astigmatism, and of a small enough amount, the readers are only partially correcting
it. It may be better than nothing, or even good enough for practical use in many cases, but
they do not usually fully or adequately correct the hyperope’s vision.
As far as myopia (“nearsightedness”) goes, its generally too unique to the individual to
standardize in a “drug store reader” kind of way. Plus if people are self-diagnosing/correcting
myopia, they almost always tend to overcorrect it, making them prone to eyestrain,
headaches, and if they are young enough, a worsening of their prescription. In fact a huge
part of the refraction procedure (“one or two?”) is making sure the patient hasn’t
overcorrected themselves.
A friend got lasik and the doc used something that basically did all the 1 or 2 stuff automatically, and apparently
you can get the same without lasik by getting an exam for high definition lenses. I'm pretty sure this Wavefront
Wavefront technology developed for custom LASIK may soon be used routinely by eye doctors to better
diagnose vision problems in eye exams, perhaps making the familiar eye chart obsolete.
Most people have had eye exams with a device called a phoropter, which contains many lenses of different
powers. An ophthalmologist or optometrist changes the lenses in front of your eyes, asking which lens produces
With this conventional approach, information you give the eye doctor is very subjective, based more on what
you think you see instead of what you actually see. But a wavefront measurement is objective, because vision
errors can be identified automatically by the way light waves travel through the eye.
Someday, these detailed wavefront measurements may replace conventional eyeglass or contact lens
prescriptions, which describe vision problems only in terms of the eye's nearsightedness, farsightedness and
astigmatism.
Just as custom (or "wavefront-guided") LASIK has the potential for producing sharper vision than conventional
LASIK, glasses and contact lenses made with this advanced technology may also produce better visual clarity
various reasons.
But, the reason your glasses cost $300 is a completely different story. The majority of the market is dominated
by one manufacturer, which also owns a majority of the retail outlets, which also (90% chance) runs your vision
insurance. So, they making the glasses, in some cases the lenses, administering your insurance, and own a lot
of the retail places where you're buying glasses at. Essentially, at any point you enter the product world of
glasses you're getting screwed by a huge monopoly. The other piece of this is a lot of these retail centers the
people there actually earn commissions. Those lens upgrades, how many different companies produce anti glare?
Scratch resistance? They're selling you options that you can't really see and unless you need transition lenses
don't really need. I recently had lasik surgery but before that I would order frames/lenses with no coatings and
not have issues ($17 dollars was what i paid after my last exam & pair of glasses). There are also online
manufacturers like Zenni optical where as long as you have an up to date script you can get a pair of glasses
Eyemed (insurance, and often where other insurance companies are getting their administration through).
Okley, sunglass hut, lens crafters, person, oliver peoples, pearle vision, target optical, ray ban, eye care plan of
america, glasses.com.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/16/business/dealbook/luxottica-essilor-merger.html
https://theweek.com/articles/784436/secretive-megacompanies-behind-glasses
https://www.forbes.com/sites/anaswanson/2014/09/10/meet-the-four-eyed-eight-tentacled-monopoly-that-i
s-making-your-glasses-so-expensive/#89a54256b66b
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00wQYmvfhn4