Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moot Memorial CAT
Moot Memorial CAT
INDEX
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
CLAIMANT
Through:
Rohit Patel
29-01-18 - The office bearers of the Club met Mr. Andy Goffin
on the said date and discussed the Project with the various
commercials associated with it. The office bearers were pleased with
the assurance and pitch given by Mr. Andy pertaining to the quality
and the time frame within which the Project will be completed. The
club informed Mr. Andy about their plan to celebrate their century
celebration on 10-02-2019 and was hoping to do the same in the ball
room hall of the new building which was as the part of the Project.
They also informed about opening the gate to 100 members after 5
years into the club who will be exclusively using the new premises.
30-06-2019 - The Club filed its reply against the said interim
application stating that there is no bar to proceed with the
arbitration between the Club and HG Properties pending moratorium
of Dharma Cements.
And
5. The said clause was not agreed upon by the counsel for
the Claimant instead the counsel suggested a CIETAC
administrative arbitration with the seat and venue being Siri,
Indo. Both the parties agreed to the suggestion stated herein.
6. It was further referred to a clause which specified that:
“the cement for the project shall be procured only from Dharma
Cements and Palladium Club hereby consents to the same and
shall waive conflicts if any”.
7. The respondent signed a Development Agreement with
the Claimant on 01-02-2018. The Project was scheduled to be
completed by 05-01-2019 and it was agreed that the total
consideration of Rupees 120 Crores would be paid in four
equal installments. It was further agreed that time was of
essence of contract. The respondent promised timely delivery
of the Project.
8. HG Properties requested 5000 bags of cement from
Dharma Cements. Those bags were to be delivered in 3
installments:
i. 1500 bags on 05-02-2018
ii. 1500 bags on 05-04-2018
iii. 2000 bags on 05-06-2018
9. HG Properties commenced its work in the Project
immediately after receiving Rupees 30 crores being the first
installment of consideration and of proceeding with it as per
schedule.
10. Meanwhile, due to the issues with Dharma Cements, the
respondent terminated its Purchase Agreements with Dharma
Cements and procured 500 bags of cement from a different
supplier to continue the work on the Project.
11. By the date 05-01-2019, the Project was hardly near
completion. The Project was left with more than 70% of the
work to be done within in the said time period as per the
agreement.
12. Respondent had received the amount of Rupees 60 crores
from the Claimant for the further consideration. Yet the
respondent was not able to deliver the promised result.
13. The respondent sent an email to the Claimant asking for
extension of the time period up to 10 months to complete the
Project.
14. The Claimant had already received the payments for
memberships from 100 applicants and was apprehensive that
they might face some problems due to the delay in completion
of the Project. The Claimant had to face the loss of reputation
and trust of the members of the Club as the members
terminated their applications and took refunds of the
membership for which they had paid to the Club.
15. The issue was brought to public eye when a local
newspaper had published about this debacle very elaborately
in their newspaper and the Club faced decreased respect and
reputation in the market. The Club was not at the risk of losing
100 years of name and worth and other permanent clients by
this news becoming a public news.
16. The Club claims the termination of the Development
Agreement and also claims the payment of Rupees 90 crores
with the payment for the damages that it has faced to the tune
of Rupees 10 crores as was stipulated under the Development
Agreement.
17. The Club had to engage another company which is ‘Durg
Estates Pvt. Ltd.’ for the completion of the Project to protect
the further damage and the loss of time and money on their
Project, for re-engaging and compensating their clients who
terminated their membership. The Club on 30-06-2019 filed
its reply against the said interim application stating that there
is no bar to proceed with arbitration between the Club and HG
Properties pending moratorium of Dharma Cements.
The Parties
1. Palladium club came into existence. Club was formed for
the mutual benefit of the members. It was formed as not for
profit and non-commercial. The Club is located in the heart of
Siri, Indo. It has excellent dining and entertainment facilities,
an excellent library, three restro-bars, six tennis courts, a 50m
swimming pool, a gymnasium, a walking track and a golf
course.
2. Hershel Gibbons Properties is an internationally
renowned real estate conglomerate. The HG Properties
created some of the world’s most iconic, large scale modern
integrated projects and is renowned for its expertise in
understanding precise quality of raw materials and timely
delivery of their Projects. The CEO of HG Properties - Mr.
Andy Goffin. The company made a beeline to ender the Indo
market. The Claimant and Mr. Andy met at a networking
event in Hoong Keang in January of 2018. Mr. Sandeep
decided to discuss the project with HG Properties as he knew
about their zeal to enter the Indo market.
Relevant clauses of the Development Agreement/ Purchase
Agreement
Clause From Development Agreement:
“Any dispute arising from or in connection with this contract
shall be submitted to China International Economic and Trade
Arbitration Commission(CIETAC), Hoong Keang Arbitration
Center for Arbitration which shall be conducted in accordance
with the CIETAC’s arbitration rules in effect at the time of
applying for arbitration. The seat of arbitration and venue of
oral hearing shall be Hoong Keang. The number of Arbitrators
shall be three. The arbitration proceeding shall be conducted in
English.” …
… “the cement for the project shall be procured only from
Dharma Cements and Palladium Club hereby consents to the
same and shall waive conflicts if any”.
19. Hence, the claimant has the claims that are further
mentioned in the Prayer.
PRAYER
CLAIMANT
Through:
Rohit Patel
And
AFFIDAVIT
I, Rohit Patel, son of Mr. Anil Malik, aged about 23 years, Sector 45,
House No. KYZ, Gurugram, Haryana – 122003 presently at
Gurugram, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as under:
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
THE DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTER (DIAC)
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
Respondent(s
)
VAKALATNAMA
I/We
, Advocate to act and appear for me/us in the above Suit/ Appeal/ Petition/
Reference / LPA and or my /our behalf to conduct and prosecute (or defend)
the same and all proceedings that may be taken in respect of my application
connected with the same of any decree order passed therein, including
proceedings in taxation and application for Review, to file and obtain return
of documents, and to deposit and receive money on my/ or behalf in the said
represent me/us and to take all necessary steps on my /our behalf in the above
matter, I/We agree to ratify all acts done by the aforesaid Advocate in
( ) Client
Advocate