Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marc TaperedBeam PDF
Marc TaperedBeam PDF
A tapered beam subjected to a tip bending load will be analyzed in order to predict the
distributions of stress and displacement in the beam. The geometrical, material, and loading
specifications for the beam are given in Figure 4.1. The geometry of the beam is the same as the
structure in Chapter 3. The thickness of the beam is 2h inches, where h is described by the
equation: h = 4 − 0.6 x + 0.03x 2
P
x
2h
Figure 4.1 Geometry, material, and loading specifications for a tapered beam.
• Because the beam is thin in the width (out-of-plane) direction, a state of plane stress can be
assumed.
• The length-to-thickness ratio of the beam is difficult to assess due to the severe taper. By
almost any measure, however, the length-to-thickness ratio of the beam is less than eight.
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-2
Hence, it is unclear whether thin beam theory will accurately predict the response of the beam.
Therefore, both a 2D plane stress elasticity analysis and a thin elastic beam analysis will be
performed.
Based on the assumptions above, two different models will be developed and compared. The first
model is a beam analysis. In this model, the main axis of the bar is discretized using straight two-
noded 1D thin beam finite elements having a uniform cross-sectional shape within each element.
Thus, the geometry is idealized as having a piecewise constant cross-section, as shown in Figure
4.2. The uniform thickness within each element is taken to be equal to the actual thickness of the
tapered beam at the x-coordinate corresponding to the centroid of that element.
The second model is a 2D plane stress model of the geometry as shown in Figure 4.1. The 2D
finite element model of this structure will be developed using 2D plane stress bilinear four-noded
quadrilateral finite elements. In the present analysis, the geometry and material properties are
symmetric about the mid-plane of the beam. However, the loading is not symmetric about this
plane, so the response of the structure (i.e., displacements, strains, and stresses) will not be
symmetric about this plane. Hence, it is necessary to model the entire domain of the beam, as
shown in Figure 4.1.
The procedure for creating the finite element model and obtaining the finite element solution for
each type of model is presented at the end of this chapter. The 1D beam analysis should be
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-3
performed three times, each with a different mesh. Meshes consisting of 2, 4 and 6 elements
should be developed. The 2D analysis should be performed only one time, using the mesh
described within the procedure.
Simple hand calculations can be performed to estimate the stresses and deflections in this beam
structure. The results of these calculations should be used to assess the validity of the finite
element results (i.e., to make sure that the finite element results are reasonable and do not contain
any large error due to a simple mistake in the model).
The vertical displacement at the end of the bar can be approximated by assuming the bar is of
uniform cross-sectional shape. The cross-sectional shape used in this calculation may be, for
example, the cross-sectional shape at the mid-point of the bar (at x = 5”). Then the vertical
displacement can be estimated using the well-known relation:
PL3
δ=
3EI
where δ is the tip displacement of the bar, I is the (uniform) second moment of the cross-
sectional area about the bending axis, and the other parameters are defined in Figure 4.1. Note
that the above relation depends strongly on the value of I, which varies along the length of the
actual beam. Thus, the approximation above cannot be expected to be accurate in the current
situation, but it should provide a reasonable first-order estimate.
The axial stress at any cross-section in the beam can be estimated by neglecting all other stress
components and assuming that the axial stress is linearly distributed over the cross-section
according to beam theory. From equilibrium, it is found that the resultant moment M at any cross-
section is P(L-x), so the axial stress can be estimated using the relation:
My P(L − x ) y
σ= =
I I
where I is the actual second moment of the area at the cross-section under consideration and y is
the vertical coordinate with its origin at the centroid of the beam.
A total of four finite element models were developed – three using 1D two-noded thin beam
elements, and one using 2D four-noded bilinear plane stress elements. Based on the results of
these analyses, perform and submit the following postprocessing steps.
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-4
(2) Create a plot of the distribution of vertical displacement along the x-axis as predicted by the
four models. Put all of the results on a single plot so that comparisons among the solutions can be
made.
(3) Create a plot of the distribution of maximum axial stress along the x-axis as predicted by the
four models. Put all of the results on a single plot so that comparisons among the solutions can be
made. For the beam element models, use hand calculations to calculate the stress based on the
predicted bending moment at each node.
(4) Comment on the convergence of displacement and stress in the 1D beam solutions.
(5) Comment on the validity of the solutions. Show the hand calculations.
TAPERED BEAM WITH A TIP LOAD -- using two elastic beam elements
Figure4.3
2b. Create a line element from point 1 to point 2 and from point
2 to point 3.
Figure 4.4
> FixedPoint
Figure 4.5
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-10
4b. Specify the vertical load on the right edge of the model.
> PointLoad
The small box to the immediate left of the button for FORCE
Y should now be highlighted. Now enter the value of the
force at the command line.
> 10.0e3
Figure4.6
> Steel
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-12
> 29.0e6
> X1
> 5.375
The second moment of the area about the local x-axis (Ixx)
is calculated as Ixx = (b)(h^3)/12, where b = 1 and h =
5.375.
> 12.94
The second moment of the area about the local y-axis (Iyy)
is calculated as Iyy = (b)(h^3)/12, where b = 5.375 and h =
1.
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-14
> 0.4479
> 0
> 0
> 1
> X2
> 2.375
The second moment of the area about the local x-axis (Ixx)
is calculated as Ixx = (b)(h^3)/12, where b = 1 and h =
2.375.
> 1.116
The second moment of the area about the local y-axis (Iyy)
is calculated as Iyy = (b)(h^3)/12, where b = 2.375 and h =
1.
> 0.1979
> 0
> 0
> 1
When the job has completed, the STATUS will read: Complete.
A successful run will have an EXIT NUMBER of 3004. Any other
exit number indicates that an error occurred during the
analysis, probably due to an error in the model.
10. REPEAT THE ABOVE PROCEDURE FOR MESHES OF FOUR ELEMENTS AND
SIX ELEMENTS.
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-20
Figure4.7
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.9
> 30 16
Figure 4.10
> FixedEdge
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-28
Box pick the nodes lying on the left edge of the model, or
<ML> to select each node individually.
Figure4.11
Application of the Finite Element Method Using MARC and Mentat 4-29
7b. Specify the vertical point load on the right edge of the
model.
> VerticalLoad
The small box to the immediate left of the button for FORCE
Y should now be highlighted.
> 1.0e4
7b4. Apply the condition to the center node on the right edge of
the model.
<ML> pick the center node on the right edge of the model.
Figure 4.12
7c. Display all boundary conditions for verification.
> Steel
> 29.0e6
> 0.30
> Thickness
> 1.0
When the job has completed, the STATUS will read: Complete.
A successful run will have an EXIT NUMBER of 3004. Any other
exit number indicates that an error occurred during the
analysis, probably due to an error in the model.