CHIMEC S.p.A. Cap. Soc. L.1.000.000.000 i.v.

Sede: Via delle Ande, 19 – 00144 Roma Part. IVA 00892451006

Tel. 06 91825.1 (selezione passante) Cod. Fisc. 00437310584
Fax 06 5918943 Telex 613213 CHIMEC I C.C.I.A.A. Roma n.341259
Filiale: Via Cappellini, 20 – 20124 Milano C.C.I.A.A. Milano n.1083787
Tel. 02 66981189 – Fax 02 66981183 Num. Meccanografico RM 002464
Stabilimento: Via Ardeatina km. 22,500 Tribunale di Roma n.2091 - 71
Loc. S.Palomba - Pomezia (Roma)
Tel. 06 91825.1 (selezione passante)
Fax 06 9194170
www.chimec.it e-mail: info@chimec.it

Mabruk Oil Operations (MOO) Mabruk Field

PO Box -911719 7th February 2011
Tripoli – Libya GSPLAJ

For the attention of: Mr Muftah Sheb

Mr Ali Sbaei
Mr Ashrf Abunaga
Mr Farag Emmtir
Mr Khaled Dabeski
Mr Musbah Aboelkhier
Mr Alhadi Alhamali

SUBJECT: Chimec Monthly service report – January 2011 (Report No.01-11)

Dear Sir(s),

Please find the monthly service report for January 2011, which gives a summary of Chimec activities and
analytical results for this period. This report is issued as a monthly document in order to update Mabruk
management as to the work undertaken by Chimec in Mabruk field during the month of January 2011.

THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES ARE SUMMARISED IN THIS REPORT:

• Activity Summary
• Chemical treatment for oil & water injection systems
• Water analyses of GOSP separated water
• Water analyses of water injection systems
• Comments and recommendations
• Oil in water analyses for GOSP separated water
• Corrosion monitoring
• Sulphide reducing bacteria results (SRB)
• Chemical stock control

Yours Sincerely,

CHIMEC S.p.A

Mohamed Amine Bouras.

CHIMEC Representatives.
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

1. OIL SYSTEM

In Mabruk field, the oil system is being treated using Chimec corrosion inhibitor CH-1735C and
Chimec scale inhibitor CH-3664 in some production oil wells with an overall target rate of 25 ppm.

The injection rates are monitored continually basing on the flow rate of each production well in order
to maintain the internal protection of flowlines and trunk lines.

1.1 CHEMICAL TREATMENT

1.1(a) Corrosion Inhibitor (CH-1735C)

Gross Oil Water Chemical Actual Total

Theoretical
Production Production Production concentration Rate consumption
rate (L/D)
(TBPD) (BPD) (BPD) (ppm) (L/D) (Litres)
46,660 29,712 16,949 25 185,5 187.30 5,806.3

1.1(b) Scale Inhibitor (CH-3664)

Gross Oil Water Chemical Actual Total

Theoretical
Production Production Production concentration Rate consumption
rate (L/D)
(TBPD) (BPD) (BPD) (ppm) (L/D) (Litres)
46,660 29,712 16,949 25 67.37 58.70 1,819.5

1.1(c) Biocide from satellite manifold (CH-7098) bi-weekly

Gross Oil Water Chemical Theoretical Actual

Production Production Production concentration rate Rate
(TBPD) (BPD) (BPD) (ppm) (L/Month) (L/Month)
46,660 29,712 16,949 400 / 4hr 549.6 551

2|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

1.1(d) Biocide from satellite manifold (CH-7360) bi-weekly

Gross Oil Water Chemical Theoretical Actual

Production Production Production concentration rate Rate
(TBPD) (BPD) (BPD) (ppm) (L/Month) (L/Month)
46,660 29,712 16,949 400 / 4hr 357.1 358

1.1(e) Flow improver PPD (CH-6739T)

Well No. A-61 A-30 A-98 96 120 119 27

Inject (L/ D) 10 5 50 10 40 30 25
Total (L) 310 155 1550 310 1240 930 775

Total per month (L) 5,270

1.1(f) Flow improver Wax Dispersant (CH-6113)

Well No. A-61 A-30 A-98 A-96 A-120 A-27 Total

Inject (L/month) 0 0 1,200 0 2,000 400 3,600

1.1(g) Biocide shock dose (CH-7098)

Location Dates Injection rate (L)

Theory Actual
A-100 01/01/2011 50 50
A-94 01/01/2011 50 50
A-65 01/01/2011 50 50
A-49 01/01/2011 50 50
A-29 02/01/2011 50 50
A-75 02/01/2011 50 50
A-33 02/01/2011 50 50
A-04 02/01/2011 50 50
A-80 03/01/2011 50 50
A-45 03/01/2011 50 50
A-74 03/01/2011 50 50
A-113 03/01/2011 50 50
A-82 05/01/2011 50 50
A-86 05/01/2011 50 50
A-87 05/01/2011 50 50
A-16 05/01/2011 50 50
A-30 06/01/2011 50 50
A31 06/01/2011 50 50
A96 06/01/2011 50 50
A-60 06/01/2011 50 50
A-91 06/01/2011 50 50

Total Litres 1,050 1,050

3|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

1.1(h) Biocide shock dose (CH-7360)

Location Dates Injection rate (L)

Theory Actual
A-100 16/01/2011 50 50
A-94 16/01/2011 50 50
A-65 16/01/2011 50 50
A-49 16/01/2011 50 50
A-29 17/01/2011 50 50
A-75 17/01/2011 50 50
A-33 17/01/2011 50 50
A-04 17/01/2011 50 50
A-80 18/01/2011 50 50
A-45 18/01/2011 50 50
A-74 18/01/2011 50 50
A-113 18/01/2011 50 50
A-82 20/01/2011 50 50
A-86 20/01/2011 50 50
A-87 20/01/2011 50 50
A-16 20/01/2011 50 50
A-30 21/01/2011 50 50
A31 21/01/2011 50 50
A96 21/01/2011 50 50
A-60 21/01/2011 50 50

Total Litres 1,000 1,000

1.2 TRUNK LINES ANALYSES

2+ 2+ 2-
Mn Fe S Residual Scale Residual corrosion
LOCATION pH
(mg/l) (mg/l) (ppm) Inhibitor (ppm) Inhibitor (ppm)
North 6.05 0.33 0.83 8 (*) (*)
South 6.36 0.44 1.56 4.5 6.02 4.65
East 6.01 0.37 0.89 7 0 5.24

(*) The sample is not representative; the sample point is contaminated oil residual and corrosion
deposit.

1.3 OIL SYSTEM COMMENTS

Actually, all the chemical injections for the oil system are within an acceptable range.
Even though we faced some issues with chemical pumps, the chemical injections are as per
requirements for all wells which are online.

The normal concerns with the pump reliability in some wells continue with frequent checking required
to ensure injection is ongoing.

Reporting and follow up of the pump failures continue to ensure that the down time for these pumps
is kept to a minimum.

All treatment analyses have been performed with satisfactory results being found. All results are
within the acceptable range with no large deviations from previous months.

4|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

The pressures of the waxy wells flow lines: A-61, A-30, A98, A96, A120, A119 and A-27 are always
monitored in order to detect any over pressure and so wells production problems.

The PPD CH-6739T is usually injection in the listed wells flowlines to avoid wax appearance and
build up.

The SRB program continues to have the desired effect of minimising the SRB activity in wellbore
annuli.
At the end of this month, a complete SRB tests survey was performed for all the oil producer wells
with the assistance of the site corrosion engineer in order to define the SRB sources.

2. WATER INJECTION SYSTEM

In Mabruk field, the water system is being treated using Chimec corrosion inhibitor CH-1937 and
Chimec scale inhibitor CH-3664 in the satellites 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 with an overall target rate of 25 ppm.
The injection rates are monitored continually basing on the flow rate of the water wells in order to
maintain the internal protection of the pipelines.

2.1 CHEMICAL TREATMENT

2.1(a) Corrosion Inhibitor (CH-1937)

Water Chemical Total monthly

Theoretical Actual Rate
Location Production concentration consumption
rate (L/ Day) (L/ Day)
(BPD) (ppm) (L)
Sat - 1 3,726 25 14.81 15 255(*)
Sat - 2 5,711 25 22.70 23 713
Sat - 3 6,461 25 25.68 26 806
Sat - 4 3,142 25 12.49 12.5 387.5
Sat - 5 4,391 25 17.45 17.5 542.5

Total monthly consumption (Litres) 2,704

5|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

(*) The corrosion inhibitor injection in Sat-1 was based on 17 days only.

2.1(b) Scale Inhibitor (CH-3664)

Water Chemical Total monthly

Theoretical Actual Rate
Location Production concentration consumption
rate (L/ Day) (L/ Day)
(BPD) (ppm) (L)
Sat - 1 3,726 25 14.81 15 240(*)
Sat - 2 5,711 25 22.70 23 713
Sat - 3 6,461 25 25.68 26 806
Sat - 4 3,142 25 12.49 12.5 387.5
Sat - 5 4,391 25 17.45 17.5 542.5

Total monthly consumption (Litres) 2,689

(*) The corrosion inhibitor injection in Sat-1 was based on 16 days only.

2.1(c) Biocide (CH-7098) bi-weekly

Water Chemical
Theoretical Actual Rate
Location Production concentration
rate (L/Month) (L/Month)
(BPD) (ppm)
Sat - 1 3,726 400/ 4 hr 116.25 76.5
Sat - 2 5,711 400/ 4 hr 179.37 180
Sat - 3 6,461 400/ 4 hr 203.60 204
Sat - 4 3,142 400/ 4 hr 91.81 92
Sat - 5 4,391 400/ 4 hr 140.44 140.5

Total monthly consumption (Litres) 693

2.1(d) Biocide (CH-7360) bi-weekly

Water Chemical
Theoretical Actual Rate
Location Production concentration
rate (L/Month) (L/Month)
(BPD) (ppm)
Sat - 1 3,726 400/ 4 hr 78.9 79
Sat - 2 5,711 400/ 4 hr 121.84 123
Sat - 3 6,461 400/ 4 hr 139 139.5
Sat - 4 3,142 400/ 4 hr 69.4 70
Sat - 5 4,391 400/ 4 hr 91.9 92

Total monthly consumption (Litres) 503.5

2.2 WATER INJECTION ANALYSES

Scale Inhibitor Corrosion

Mn2+ Fe2+ S2-
LOCATION pH residual Inhibitor residual
(mg/l) (mg/l) (ppm)
(ppm) (ppm)
WW-1 6.43 1.21 >10
WW-2 6.39 1.32 6.5
WW-3 6.48 0.94 6
WW-5 6.53 0.88 7.5

6|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

Scale Inhibitor Corrosion

Mn2+ Fe2+ S2-
LOCATION pH residual Inhibitor residual
(mg/l) (mg/l) (ppm)
(ppm) (ppm)
A-32i 6.26 0.34 0.27 5.5 4.53 4.17
A-26i 6.27 0.33 1.48 >10 4.02 4.06
A-52i 6.20 0.37 1.01 7 3.92 4.1
A-37i 6.29 0.48 1.84 10 4.31 3.75
A-79i 6.31 0.39 0.94 9 4.12 4.16

2.3 WATER INJECTION COMMENTS

As in previous months for the water injection system, the main area of concern is the reliability of the
chemical injection pumps in order to keep the water pipelines in safe condition.

We can remark that, during the last months, the number of pumps failures decreased because of the
continuous monitoring of all the injection pumps and tanks at the wells and the satellites.

In other hand, some of the chemical injection pumps at the satellites should be completely replaced
by new ones because they became in very bad state which causes material and time loses.

The results from the water injection system during the month indicate that from the wet chemistry
analysis, corrosion in the system remains stable and under control.

The results for the pH and the sulphide values are fairly stable.

The Fe2+ results are in low range of expected results from the field.

Comparing the water source results with those of the injector’s, it can be seen that the corrosion
contributing to the iron concentration is controlled.
2+
The Mn results support the iron analyses indicating that from an internal corrosion perspective the
facilities are well protected.

As detailed in previous reports, an area which could further improve this situation would be to
implement the recommendation to split the corrosion inhibitor between the wellhead and down
stream of the filters.

This would allow a protective film to adhere to the flow line between wellhead and current injection
point but would not cause too much deposit in the filters as the majority of the protection would be
added afterwards.

7|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

3.GOSP SYSTEM

3.1 CHEMICAL TREATMENT

Before the start up of the old GOSP, all the production was being treated at the new GOSP facilities.

Actually,

• The North trunk line and the East trunk line are connected to the new GOSP.
• The South trunk lines and the South stand alone wells are connected to the old GOSP.
The corrosion inhibitor CH-1735C, the scale inhibitor CH-3664 and the Demulsifier CH-2137T are
currently injected at the new and the old GOSP inlets according the flow rate of the production
coming to each plant. New skids are installed at the old GOSP inlet to provide the chemicals injection
for this system.

The water separated at the two plants is sent, through two different circuits, to the oily water
separator where it is treated by corrosion inhibitor CH-1937 and biocides CH-7360 and CH-7098
injected from the oily water chemical skid.

Actually, for the old GOSP, the corrosion and the scale inhibitors are injected using pneumatic pumps
which are not adequate for this service. Electrical pump should be installed because they can inject
permanently the required rates with more exactitude.

The Demulsifier injection is provided by the same electrical pump used for the new GOSP
Demulsifier injection because it is equipped with two injection heads.

8|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

In the tables below, they are mentioned the chemicals consumptions based on the rate of all the
production and the produced water entering the GOSP (old & new).
3.1(a) GOSP INLET

Flow rate Injection rate (L/D) Target Total use

Chemical
Bbl/ Day Theory Actual Concentration (ppm) (L/Month)
CH-1735C 46,660 59.35 60.5 8 1,875.5
CH-2137T 46,660 59.35 60.5 8 1,875.5
CH-3664 16,949 16.17 16.5 6 511.5

3.1(b) OILY WATER TREATMENT

Flow rate Injection rate (L/D) Target Total use

Chemical
Bbl/ Day Theory Actual Concentration (ppm) (L/Month)
CH-1937 16,949 26.95 27.5 10 852.5
CH-7360 16,949 134.74 135 50 1,890 (*)
CH-7098 16,949 134.74 135 50 2,295(**)

(*) The consumption was based on 14 days.

(**) The consumption was based on 17 days.

3.1(c) EXPORT LINE TREATMENT

Chemical Flow rate Injection rate Target Total use (L)

Bbl/ Day Theory Actual Concentration (ppm) (L/Month)
CH-6739T 29,712 188.97 190.5 40 5,906

3.2 GOSP WATER ANALYSES RESULTS

Scale Inh Corr Inh

LOCATION pH Mn2+ (mg/l) Fe2+ (mg/l) S2- (ppm) residual residual
(ppm) (ppm)
Old GOSP inlet 6.21 0.41 0.21 7 3.64 4.01
New GOSP inlet 6.32 0.38 0.29 8 3.81 3.82
Old GOSP KO drum 6.22 0.36 0.46 5.5 7.08 5.71
Old GOSP 3ps 6.28 0.39 0.65 6 6.68 5.13
New GOSP 3ps 6.34 0.32 0.32 6.5 8.12 7.71
Oily water sep 6.41 0.27 0.34 5 5.91 9.76
A-22i 6.59 0.35 0.35 >10 5.17 9.01

3.3 OIL IN WATER ANALYSES RESULTS

New GOSP (ppm) Old GOSP (ppm)

Date O.W.S O.W.S K.O.D 3.P.S
3.P.S B.T
inlet outlet D-25 D-10A/B
02/01/2011 130 105 67 36 37 46
05/01/2011 186 105 91 37 46 46
08/01/2011 179 112 95 41 38 49
11/01/2011 162 127 82 37 29 53
14/01/2011 157 113 76 223 34 61

9|Page
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

New GOSP (ppm) Old GOSP (ppm)

Date O.W.S O.W.S K.O.D 3.P.S
3.P.S B.T
inlet outlet D-25 D-10A/B
17/01/2011 163 118 94 39 36 73
20/01/2011 170 124 112 48 43 70
24/01/2011 168 113 95 49 41 62
28/01/2011 142 106 81 26 41 36
31/01/2011 136 95 81 28 31 36

250

200
Oil in Water (ppm)

150

100

50

0
11 an
12 n
13 n
14 n
15 n
16 an
17 n
18 an
19 an
20 n
21 an
22 n
23 an
24 an
25 n
26 an
27 an
28 n
29 n
30 an
31 n
an
n

4- n
5- n
n
n

8- n
n

10 n

a
a
a
a

a
a

a
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
Ja
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
-J
2-
3-

6-
7-

9-

Date
3.P.S O.W.S Inlet O.W.S Outlet Baffer tank K.O.D Old GOSP 3.P.S Old GOSP

Graph 01: Oil in water concentration during January

3.4 BATH HEATERS WATER ANALYSES RESULTS

Parameters 03/01/2011 10/01/2011 17/01/2011 24/01/2011 31/01/2011

Bath heater A
pH 9.52 9.18 9.5 9.85 9.76
SO42- (mg/l) 163 174 158 195 150
NO2 (mg/l) 3975 3652 3541 4,640 4,320
Fe2+ (mg/l) 0.05 0.16 0.21 0.04 0.03
Cl- (mg/l) 196.5 186.5 192 184 212.7
Bath heater B
pH 9.16 9.09 9.1 9.55 9.75
SO42- (mg/l) 176 168 181 210 176
NO2 (mg/l) 2896 2975 3169 2,760 3,720
Fe2+ (mg/l) 0.92 0.63 0.53 0.07 0.05
Cl- (mg/l) 204 207 213 177.5 173.2

10 | P a g e
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

3.5 GOSP COMMENTS

All the chemical injection rates are acceptably close to the theoretical values given as a target and the
results from the wet chemical analysis are within acceptable limits.

These results have been maintained at this rate for a number of months indicating good stability with the
current treatment schedule.

Oil in water results are listed in the table above. These results, in the normal operating, are acceptable.

We can remark also that the separated water at the old GOSP three phases separators has a very good
quality in term of Oil in water comparing with the new GOSP three phases separator.

For the oily water separator, the plates package inside has been removed, so the separation in the vessel
became based on a simple settling.

We follow the oil in water at the outlet of this separator just to have an idea about its actual efficiency and
the quantity of oil which leaves the separator and then can arrive at to the buffer tank.

All the analyses results are acceptable and show a very good efficiency of the current chemical
treatments.

4. SULPHATE REDUCING BACTERIA RESULTS (SRB)

4.1 SRB RESULTS

Location Date Inoculated Date Reading MPN Comment

A-113 05/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-29 03/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-82 21/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-100 21/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-94 01/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-80 05/01/2011 06/02/2011 2.5 Positive but controlled
A-16 21/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-87 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-30 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-31 06/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-65 01/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-60 06/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-45 05/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-96 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-45 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-60 21/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-49 01/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-86 02/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-75 03/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-86 21/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-16 02/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-75 20/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-91 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled

11 | P a g e
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

A-80 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled

A-04 03/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-29 2012/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-87 0201/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-30 06/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-22i 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-96 06/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-82 02/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-74 05/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-97 17/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-74 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-33 03/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-65 21/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-31 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-33 20/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-04 20/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-113 22/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
A-100 01/01/2011 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
New GOSP inlet 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
310-TK-312 21/11/2010 06/02/2011 25 Positive
N.T.L 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
310-TK-311 15/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
Old GOSP Desalter 23/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
New GOSP Desalter 26/11/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
310-TK-312 14/12/2010 06/02/2011 2.5 Positive but controlled
S.T.L 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
S.T.L 23/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
New GOSP inlet 23/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
New GOSP 3.P.S 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
N.T.L 23/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
Old GOSP 3.P.S 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
E.T.L 23/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
Open drain 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
Rig-26 water tank 29/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
Oily water separator 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 0 Controlled
310-TK-312 26/12/2010 06/02/2011 >110 Positive
Old GOSP K.O.D 23/01/2011 06/02/2011 >110 Positive

4.2 SRB COMMENTS

The majority of the results taken during the month of January for samples inoculated in January and
December are controlled.

There are same samples which have shown, recently, microbiological activity and these areas must be
monitored to ensure that the control continues.

12 | P a g e
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

These areas, concerned by the SRB growth, are the GOSP facilities and the trunk lines:
• Trunk lines: ETL, STL, and NTL.
• GOSP Facilities: GOSP inlets, 3.Ph.Sep, Desalters and also the crude oil storage tanks.

As a first step to investigate this situation, SRB test campaign was performed for all the oil producer wells in
Mabruk field in order to find out the contaminated area.

SRB test we performed also in the three trunk lines and in all the sample points of the GOSP facilities to
confirm these contaminations.

We will focus in this period on these areas in order to eliminate the SRB presence inside.

Some solutions can be adopted to treat the SRB in the concerned areas:
• Update the list of wells concerned by the biocide shock in the annulus.
• Increase the flow rate of biocide during the shock of the oil system.
• Inject biocide at the inlet of the GOSP in order to treat the stream before entering the GOSP
facilities.

5. CHEMICAL STOCK

5.1 WAREHOSUE INVENTORY (IN MABRUK)

Chemical Code Quantity On Hand

Corrosion Inhibitor oil CH-1735C 169
Corrosion Inhibitor water CH-1937 109
Demulsifier CH-2137T 100
Flow Improver CH-6739T 256
Wax dispersant CH-6113 174
Oxygen Scavenger CH-4063 27
Deoiler CH-5762A 43
Scale inhibitor CH-3664 70
Biocide CH-7098 73
Biocide CH-7360 63

5.2 ORDER RECEIVED IN JANUARY

Chemical Code Quantity received

Corrosion Inhibitor oil CH-1735C 170
Corrosion Inhibitor water CH-1937 80
Demulsifier CH-2137T 80
Flow Improver CH-6739T 160
Wax dispersant CH-6113 70

6. CHEMICAL USAGE : INVOICE/ USAGE COMPARISON

Usage Usage Invoice

Chemical Code +/- comment
(Litres) (drum) (drum)
Corrosion Inhibitor oil CH-1735C 7,681.8 38.5 32 Ok
Corrosion Inhibitor water CH-1937 3,556.5 18 10 OK
Demulsifier CH-2137T 1,875.5 9.5 9 OK (*)
Flow Improver CH-6739T 11,176 56 51 OK (**)
Wax dispersant CH-6113 3,600 18 18 OK

13 | P a g e
 April 09 Chimec Monthly Report N-01-11, January 2011

Usage Usage Invoice

Chemical Code +/- comment
(Litres) (drum) (drum)
Oxygen Scavenger CH-4063 0 OK 0 0
Deoiler CH-5762A 0 OK 0 0
Scale inhibitor CH-3664 5,020 OK 25 24
Biocide CH-7098 4,589 OK 23 22
Biocide CH-7360 3,751.5 OK 19 26
Total chemical usage OK 208 192
Note:
(*): Actually we are using Demulsifier for the new and the old GOSP. We have three chemical tanks.
(**): Actually, we are using the big chemical tank (10.000 litters)

60

Chemical Conception VS Invoice

50
Usage (drum)
Invoice (drum)

40

30
Drums

20

10

0
CH-3664 CH-1735C CH-1937 CH-7098 CH-7360 CH-2137T CH-6739T CH-6113 CH-5762A CH-4063
Chemicals

Graph 02: Chemical consumption Vs invoice

14 | P a g e