Professional Documents
Culture Documents
100
Cavg = 15.38106
Cmin= 15.785226
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.7-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: 3Cr-1Mo
6.50
6.30
6.10
5.90
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
5.70
5.50
5.30
5.10
4.90
4.70
4.50
800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
13.8 5Cr-0.5Mo
A large amount of data on 5Cr-0.5Mo tubes was obtained from overseas sources. The stress rupture
database exceeded 500 test results, many lasting many years. Tensile data were also obtained but there
was significant scatter, especially at higher temperatures. Over 20 heats were evaluated with good
agreement with the current lines.
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.8-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: 5Cr-0.5Mo
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.8-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: 5Cr-0.5Mo
100
Cavg = 15.58928
Cmin= 16.025829
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.8-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: 5Cr-0.5Mo
6.50
6.30
6.10
5.90
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
5.70
5.50
5.30
5.10
4.90
4.70
4.50
800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
13.9 5Cr-0.5Mo-Si
There are no new data sources for 5Cr-0.5Mo-Si. Therefore, the material parameters developed for 5Cr-
0.5Mo are used to develop the following plots.
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.9-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: 5Cr-0.5Mo-Si
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.9-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: 5Cr-0.5Mo-Si
100
Cavg = 15.58928
Cmin= 16.025829
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.9-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: 5Cr-0.5Mo-Si
6.50
6.30
6.10
5.90
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
5.70
5.50
5.30
5.10
4.90
4.70
4.50
800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
13.10 7Cr-0.5Mo
This alloy is seldom specified and has been deleted from several current ASTM specifications. Little data
could be found in the literature and the data were not considered statistically meaningful or suitable for
generating new curves. The plots shown are based on the previous API 530 curves for the alloy
converted to the format used in this document. They are not intended to represent any change in the
properties anticipated.
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.10-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: 7Cr-0.5Mo
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
34 36 38 40 42 44
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.10-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter Miller – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US
Customary Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: 7Cr-0.5Mo
100
Cavg = 19.62055
Cmin= 20.43746
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
34 36 38 40 42 44
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.10-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: 7Cr-0.5Mo
8.00
7.80
7.60
7.40
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
7.20
7.00
6.80
6.60
6.40
6.20
6.00
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
TEMPERATURE, F
13.11 9Cr-1Mo
The data base compiled was confined to tubes produced overseas for heat exchangers as opposed to the
original database of domestic products that produced an unusually wide scatter band. The relatively
good oxidation resistance of the alloy permitted tests to very low stresses and a normal scatter band was
obtained from this analysis. Most of the data tracked API’s mean line but the resulting minimum (design)
lines are higher than the current lines at most temperatures. A second order polynomial was selected to
provide conservatism for extrapolation beyond the range of available data.
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.11-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: 9Cr-1Mo
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.11-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: 9Cr-1Mo
100
Cavg = 25.85909
Cmin= 26.223587
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
42 44 46 48 50 52 54
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.11-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: 9Cr-1Mo
11.00
10.00
9.00
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300
TEMPERATURE, F
13.12 9Cr-1Mo-0.25V
For this material new data were obtained primarily from Japan.
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.12-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: 9Cr-1Mo-0.25V
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
52 54 56 58 60 62
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.12-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: 9Cr-1Mo-0.25V
100
Cavg = 30.36423
Cmin= 30.886006
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
52 54 56 58 60 62
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.12-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: 9Cr-1Mo-0.25V
15.00
13.00
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
11.00
9.00
7.00
5.00
3.00
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300
TEMPERATURE, F
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
s
i
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.13-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 304L Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
32 34 36 38 40 42
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.13-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 304L Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 17.55
Cmin= 18.287902
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
32 34 36 38 40 42
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.13-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 304L Stainless Steel
9.50
9.00
8.50
8.00
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
7.50
7.00
6.50
6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.13-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 304L Stainless Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.14-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 304 & Type 304H
Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.14-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 304 & Type 304H Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 15.52195
Cmin= 16.145903
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.14-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 304 & Type 304H Stainless Steel
7.00
6.50
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.14-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 304 & Type 304H Stainless
Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.15-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 316L Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.15-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 316L Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 15.2
Cmin= 15.740107
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.15-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 316L Stainless Steel
9.50
8.50
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
7.50
6.50
5.50
4.50
3.50
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.15-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 316L Stainless Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.16-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 316 & Type 316H
Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
30 32 34 36 38 40 42
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.16-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 316 & Type 316H Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 16.30987
Cmin= 16.764145
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.16-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 316 & Type 316H Stainless Steel
6.50
6.30
6.10
RUPTURE EXPONENTENT, n
5.90
5.70
5.50
5.30
5.10
4.90
4.70
4.50
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.16-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 316 & Type 316H Stainless
Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
s
i
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.17-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 317L Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.17-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Using Type 316L Data): Type 317L Stainless
Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.17-3: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Showing Type 317L Data Points Relative to
Type 316L Parameter Equations): Type 317L Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 15.2
Cmin= 15.740107
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.17-4: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 317L Stainless Steel (Using Type 316L Data)
9.50
8.50
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
7.50
6.50
5.50
4.50
3.50
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.17-5: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 317L Stainless Steel (Using
Type 316L Date)
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.18-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 321 Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.18-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 321 Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 13.325
Cmin= 12.8
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
24 26 28 30 32 34 36
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.18-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 321 Stainless Steel
6.25
5.75
5.25
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
4.75
4.25
3.75
3.25
2.75
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.18-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 321 Stainless Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.19-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 321H Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.19-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 321H Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 14.75958
Cmin= 15.293986
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.19-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 321H Stainless Steel
6.50
6.00
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
5.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.19-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 321H Stainless Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
K STRENGTH
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
i EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.20-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 347 Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
26 28 30 32 34 36 38
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.20-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 347 Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 14.25
Cmin= 14.889042
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
26 28 30 32 34 36 38
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.20-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 347 Stainless Steel
11.00
10.00
9.00
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.20-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 347 Stainless Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
K PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
s
EXISTING RP 530 TENSILE
i
EXISTING RP 530 YIELD
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.21-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: Type 347H Stainless Steel
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
26 28 30 32 34 36
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.21-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: Type 347H Stainless Steel
100
Cavg = 13.79341
Cmin= 14.458025
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.21-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: Type 347H Stainless Steel
9.50
9.00
8.50
8.00
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
7.50
7.00
6.50
6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.21-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: Type 347H Stainless Steel
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
s
i
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.22-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: UNS N08800 (Alloy 800)
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
S
EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
T
RUPTURE DATA
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.22-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: UNS N08800 (Alloy 800)
100
Cavg = 16.50878
Cmin= 17.005384
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.22-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: UNS N08800 (Alloy 800)
6.00
5.80
5.60
5.40
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
5.20
5.00
4.80
4.60
4.40
4.20
4.00
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.22-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: UNS N08800 (Alloy 800)
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
s
i
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.23-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: UNS N08810 (Alloy 800H)
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.23-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: UNS N08810 (Alloy 800H)
100
Cavg = 16.04227
Cmin= 16.564046
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.23-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: UNS N08810 (Alloy 800H)
7.00
6.50
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.23-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: UNS N08810 (Alloy 800H)
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
s
i
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.24-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: UNS N08811 (Alloy 800HT)
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.24-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: UNS N08811 (Alloy 800HT)
100
Cavg = 13.2341
Cmin= 13.606722
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
28 30 32 34 36 38 40
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.24-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: UNS N08811 (Alloy 800HT)
7.25
6.75
6.25
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
5.75
5.25
4.75
4.25
3.75
900 995 1090 1185 1280 1375 1470 1565 1660 1755 1850
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.24-4: Rupture Exponent as a Function of Temperature: UNS N08811 (Alloy 800HT)
13.25 HK-40
Elevated temperature yield and ultimate tensile strength values were obtained for the high carbon content
HK 40 castings. The strength properties found varied, but the trend shown was strongly indicative of an
increase in yield strength in the 1200-1300˚F range due to precipitation at those temperatures. The
extent of the increase in yield strength is not easily displayed by the smooth curve of the polynomial used
to display the properties. The large database collected shows lower minimums than the existing API 530
curves.
100
S
T
R
E
S
S 10
,
K PROPOSED TENSILE
STRENGTH
s
i
PROPOSED YIELD STRENGTH
1
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750
TEMPERATURE, F
Figure 13.25-1: Yield and Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature – Comparison of
Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary Units: HK-40
100
PROPOSED AVERAGE
PROPOSED MINIMUM
S EXISTING RP 530 AVERAGE
T EXISTING RP 530 MINIMUM
R RUPTURE DATA
E
S
S 10
,
K
s
i
1
26 28 30 32 34 36
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.25-2: The Average and Minimum Stress Rupture Strengths as Functions of the Larson-
Miller Parameter – Comparison of Existing RP530 Data and Proposed New Data in US Customary
Units Based on the Average Larson-Miller Constant: HK-40
100
Cavg = 10.4899
Cmin= 10.856489
S
T
R 10
E
S
S
,
1
K
s
i
0.1
22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
LARSON‐MILLER PARAMETER/1000
Figure 13.25-3: Design Curve Showing the Larson-Miller Parameter as a Function of Stress in US
Customary Units. The Minimum Larson-Miller Constant (Cmin) is used to Calculate Minimum Time-
Dependent Properties and the Average Larson-Miller Constant (Cavg) is used to Calculate Average
Time-Dependent Properties: HK-40
5.00
4.80
4.60
4.40
RUPTURE EXPONENT, n
4.20
4.00
3.80
3.60
3.40
3.20
3.00
1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850
TEMPERATURE, F