Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Checklist For GCP 2005 PDF
Checklist For GCP 2005 PDF
Kiyomi Hirayama1,*, Naohisa Fukuda2, Hitoshi Satoh3, Katsumi Itoh4, Kiyoshi Chiba5,
Yutaka Nakae6, Masayuki Takezawa7 and Kuniko Gotoh8
1
Quality Assurance Resources, Banyu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AIG Kabutocho Building, 5-1, Nihom-bashi-
Kabutocho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0026, Japan
2
Quality Assurance, Pharmaceutical Development Division, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., 4-1-1,
Doshomachi, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-8645, Japan
3
Clinical Quality Control Group, Development & Regulatory, Abbott Japan Co. Ltd., 5-25-5 Sendagaya,
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 151-8563, Japan
4
Regulatory Audit, Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 1-6, Kashima 2-chome, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka
532-8514, Japan
5
Quality & Regulatory Affairs Division, Quality Assurance Department, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd.,
1-6-1, Ohtemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8185, Japan
6
Medical Quality Management Co. Ltd. 2-9-5-305, Ichikawa-Minami, Ichikawa 272-0033, Japan
7
Clinical Research Operations, Medical System Research Corp., Gracy Tenjinbashi Bldg. No2. 9F, 7-12-6
Tenjinbashi, Kita-ku, Osaka 531-0041, Japan
8
Quality Assurance, Sankyo Co. Ltd., 2-58, Hiromachi 1-chome, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan
Summary
This checklist is an English translation of the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) compliance
checklist prepared by the Japanese agency for on-site inspections of medical
institutions.y Please note that the checklist was translated by the authors and has not
received official review by any Japanese agency including the Organization for
Pharmaceutical Safety and Research (OPSR).
This checklist is an addendum to a previously published article on the evaluation of
overseas GCP inspections by the Japanese Regulatory Agency [1]. Copyright # 2005
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Key Words: GCP inspection; GCP site audit; GCP checklist; Japanese Regulatory Agency;
MHLW
*Correspondence to: Kiyomi Hirayama, Quality Assurance Resources, Banyu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AIG Kabutocho
Building, 5-1, Nihombashi-Kabutocho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0026, Japan. E-mail: kiyomi hirayama@merck.com
y
The Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research (OPSR) in Japan has regularly conducted inspections at
sponsor and investigator sites/investigators. Overseas GCP inspections were conducted by Pharmaceuticals and
Medical Devices Evaluation Center (PMDEC) of National Institute of Health Sciences of Ministry of Health, Labor and
Welfare (MHLW) up until March 2004. Inspectors of OPSR and PMDEC used this checklist in inspections. However,
these procedures and checklist may change in the future as OPSR and PMDEC were integrated into the
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) as a special public corporation of MHLW, on 1 April 2004.
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
DOI: 10.1002/qaj.333
Checklist 121
Checklist
Numbers in the parentheses indicate the situation in the department/specialty in charge of the trial.
[] Suitable
Institution Department/specialty:
Number of beds:
Number of inpatients: ( )
Number of outpatients: ( )
* Has the facilities and personnel necessary for conducting adequate clinical
observation and laboratory testing.
* Is able to execute necessary measures when an emergency arises with subjects.
* Has established an Institutional Review Board (IRB) (excluding those cases
corresponding to the exception rule).
* Has secured the necessary number of staff, such as investigator, sub-investigators,
pharmacists, nurses and other personnel.
[] Other:
Numbers in the parentheses indicate the situation in the department/specialty in charge of the trial.
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
122 K. Hirayama et al.
[] Suitable
Title:
Preparation date:
Revision date: Revision date: Revision date:
(2) Procedures necessary to permit the proper and smooth conduct of clinical trials
[Article 36, Paragraph 2]
(Designation of sub-investigators and trial collaborators, means dissemination of information in the
medical institution: enforcement notification)
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Other:
[] Suitable
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 123
Basis of establishment
[] Suitable
[] Capable of fully reviewing the clinical trial from ethical and scientific viewpoints
[] Comprised of five or more members
[] Having members (at least one person) other than those with expert knowledge in
medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, other areas of medical care, or clinical trials
(enforcement notification)
[] Having members (at least one person) not related to the medical institution
(enforcement notification)
[] Head of the medical institution unable to be a member of this medical institution’s
IRB (enforcement notification)
[] Other:
Obtain SOPs and a list of members for the IRB utilized, except for IRB established by the medical
institution [Article 30, Paragraphs 2 and 3]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
124 K. Hirayama et al.
[] Other:
(1) Preparation of SOPs documenting the following items and the conduct of tasks in accordance
with these SOPs [Article 28, Paragraph 2]
[] Suitable
Preparation date:
Revision date: Revision date: Revision date:
Regulation items
[] Other:
[] Suitable
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 125
(1) Requests for the opinion of the IRB on the appropriateness of conducting a clinical trial
[Article 30, Paragraph 1: Retrospective application]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(2) Review and documented opinion on the appropriateness of the clinical trial
[Article 32, Paragraph 1]
[] Suitable
Conclusion: [] Approval
[] Modification required prior to its approval
[] Rejection
Contents:
Review documents
[] Other:
(3) Notification in writing of the opinion of the IRB [Article 32, Paragraph 3]
[] Suitable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
126 K. Hirayama et al.
[] Other:
(4) Review and opinion, notification of any major amendments to the protocol
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Conclusion, etc.:
[] Other:
(5) Review of the appropriateness of continuing the clinical trial when the clinical trial
period exceeds one year (at least once a year) and notification in writing of the opinion
[Article 31, Paragraph 1, Article 32, Paragraphs 2 and 3]
(a) Report of a summary of the status of clinical trial [Article 48, Paragraph 1]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Conclusion: [] Approval
[] Modification required prior to approval
[] Withdrawal of existing approval
Contents:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 127
[] Other:
(6) Review of the appropriateness of continuing the clinical trial when information is
obtained about serious adverse reactions, and notification in writing of the opinion
[Article 31, Paragraph 2, Article 32, Paragraphs 2 and 3]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Conclusion: [] Approval
[] Modification required prior to its approval
[] Withdrawal of existing approval
Contents:
[] Other:
6. Retention of records
Retention of the following records (until the manufacturing approval date for the investigational drug
or three years from the date of the termination or completion of the clinical trial) [Article 34]
[] Suitable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
128 K. Hirayama et al.
* Protocol.
* Investigator’s brochure.
* Sample of case report form.
* Written subject information/consent form.
* Documents citing names of prospective investigator/sub-investigator(s).
* Documents indicating anticipated payments to the medical institution.
* Documents on compensation to subjects for impairment of health.
* Materials concerning subject recruitment procedures.
* Documents concerning information important for the proper conduct of the clinical
trial.
* Current curriculum vitae of prospective investigator/sub-investigator(s).
* Notification to the IRB (adverse reaction reports, report of termination or completion of
the clinical trial).
* Meeting minutes of the IRB (attendees, review results, opinions and agenda points,
etc.).
[] Other:
[] Suitable
Investigator Name:
Title:
[] Other:
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 129
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Explanation of the details of the clinical trial (protocol, investigator’s brochure etc.)
[] Supply of information (information about adverse reactions, etc. provided by the
sponsor)
[] Other:
(1) Report in writing of any ‘unexpected and serious adverse reactions’ [II.-5.-6)-a]
(2) Report in writing of any ‘serious adverse events’
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(3) Report in writing of cancellation or suspension of the clinical trial (specify the reason)
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
130 K. Hirayama et al.
(4) Report in writing of ‘completion of the clinical trial’ (summary of trial results to be
attached)
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(a-1) When an investigator has deviated from the protocol in order to eliminate an
immediate hazard to subjects or for other unavoidable medical reasons, the investigator
shall document all such deviations, and submit documentation describing those
deviations and the reasons thereof to the sponsor and the head of the medical institution
[Article 46].
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Review date:
Conclusion: [] Approval
[] Other
Contents:
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 131
(b) Investigator/sub-investigators must keep a record of every deviation from the protocol
regardless of the reason, and should prepare and submit records explaining the reasons thereof
to the sponsor [Implementation Notification Article 46]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(2) Provision of SOPs (prepared by the sponsor) for investigational drug storage management
[Article 39, Paragraph 1]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(3) Appropriate control of investigational drug (according to relevant SOPs) [Article 39,
Paragraph 2]
[] Suitable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
132 K. Hirayama et al.
[] Other:
4. Retention of records
(1) Appointment of person responsible for record retention [Article 41, Paragraph 1]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(2) Retention of records (until the manufacturing approval date for the investigational
drug or three years after the date of termination/completion of the trial) [Article 41,
Paragraph 2]
[] Suitable
Documents to be retained:
[] Other:
[] Suitable
* Subject’s health condition, symptoms, age, ability to give consent, etc. shall be
carefully considered in accordance with the objectives of the clinical trial, from
both ethical and scientific perspectives.
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 133
[] Other:
(2) Explanation and, if necessary, confirmation, of proper use of the investigational drug to subject
[Article 45, Paragraph 1]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(3) In the event any subject is receiving treatment by other physicians, notification to the relevant
physicians of the subject’s participation in the clinical trial with the subject’s agreement
[Article 45, Paragraph 2]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(4) Necessary measures/precautions to provide proper medical care for the subjects in case of
experiencing adverse events [Article 45, Paragraph 3]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(5) In the case of an adverse event occurring in a subject that requires treatment, notification to the
subject of the fact [Article 45, Paragraph 4]
[] Not applicable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
134 K. Hirayama et al.
[] Suitable
[] Other:
2. Explanation
(1) Issuance of written information covering the items listed below [Article 51,
Paragraph 1]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(2) Details whose inclusion in written information is forbidden [Article 51, Paragraph 2]
[] Suitable
[] Fact that the prospective subjects appear to waive their rights, etc.
[] Fact that any of the responsibilities of the sponsor, medical
institution, investigator, or sub-investigator(s) have been dispensed with or
reduced
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 135
(3) Preparation of written information using language and expressions that are as non-technical as
practicable and understandable to the subject [Article 51, Paragraph 3]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Suitable
[] Proper explanation to each prospective subject using written information [Article 50,
Paragraph 1]
[] Other:
(5) Sufficient time for questions and answers with subjects or their legally acceptable
representatives [Article 50, Paragraph 5]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
In life-saving clinical trials in emergency situations, conditions for enrolling subjects without
obtaining their consent or the consent of their legally acceptable representatives [Article 55,
Paragraph 1]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Case No.:
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
136 K. Hirayama et al.
(1) Supply of relevant information to the subjects, recording to the documentation, confirmation of
subjects’ willingness to continue participation in the clinical trial [Article 54, Paragraph 1]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Revision date:
[] Other:
(3) In case the written information is revised, report to the head of the medical institution,
obtaining of subjects’ consent (or their legally acceptable representatives’ consent) to their
continued participation in the clinical trial [Article 54, Paragraph 3]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Reporting date:
Obtaining of subjects’ consent:
[] Other:
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 137
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(2) Consent by prospective subject’s legally acceptable representative when it is difficult to obtain
consent by the prospective subject [Article 50, Paragraph 2]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(4) Presence of a witness when the prospective subject is incapable of reading the written
information [Article 52, Paragraph 3]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(5) In life-saving clinical trials under emergency conditions, the subject or prospective subject’s
legally acceptable representative should be informed about the trial as soon as possible and
consent to continue should be obtained [Article 55, Paragraph 2]
[] Not applicable
[] Suitable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
138 K. Hirayama et al.
[] Other:
(1) Accurate preparation of case report forms (case records) in accordance with the protocol and
affixing of seal and/or signature of the investigator [Article 47, Paragraph 1]
[] Consistency with the source documents (comparison and verification) [Article 47,
Paragraph 1]
(When there is any contradiction, a record must be prepared explaining the reason
[implementation notification])
[] Suitable
[] Other:
(3) Investigator must check case report forms prepared by sub-investigators, verify the contents,
and seal and/or sign them [Article 47, Paragraph 3]
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Suitable
[] Other:
[] Suitable
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.
Checklist 139
Reference
[1] Hirayama K, Fukuda N, Satoh H, et al. Overseas GCP inspections by the Japanese regulatory agency: a systematic
review of 13 cases (1998–2003). Qual Assur J 2004; 9(1): 14–21.
Copyright r 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Qual Assur J 2005; 9, 120–139.