Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062608
062608-2
TRANSIENT FLOWS IN ACTIVE POROUS MEDIA PHYSICAL REVIEW E 95, 062608 (2017)
t
0.2 0.2 0.2
0 0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x x x
FIG. 3. Oscillations in active porous media at high Pe. Kymographs of the transient evolution of the solute concentration c(x,t) in the pipe
for Peclet numbers increasing from left to right: Pe = 1 (a), Pe = 10 (b), and Pe = 100 (c). The active porous media is located at x0 = 0.25.
Colors indicate concentration (dark blue: c = 0, dark red: c = 1).
where we have introduced the parameter γ = cs (x0 ), the To further elucidate the characteristics of the oscillations,
steady-state concentration at x0 . The solution to Eq. (8) with we studied the temporal evolution of a small disturbance to
boundary conditions (6) is the steady state. We thus added a weak Gaussian perturbation
to the steady-state solution [Eq. (9)] at an arbitrary position
ePe γ x − 1 xp within the domain, and we studied the approach to
cs (x) = . (9)
ePe γ − 1 equilibrium. The amplitude of the perturbation was less than
The parameter γ = cs (x0 ) can be determined as a function of 3% of the steady-state value. After the initial perturbation had
the system parameters (Pe and x0 ) by solving the transcenden- decayed, we observed an approximately decaying harmonic
tal equation time dependence of the disturbance at the position xobs , i.e.,
062608-3
LEFTERIS I. KOSMIDIS AND KAARE H. JENSEN PHYSICAL REVIEW E 95, 062608 (2017)
(14)
20
where k = kr + iki is the complex wave number with kr > 0,
and g(x) is an unknown function of x. Substitution of Eqs. (14)
0 and (13) into Eq. (5) leads to a spatial equation for g(x),
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pe Pe2 γ Pe γ x
g (x) − Pe γ g (x) + kg(x) = e g(x0 ), (15)
(b) ePe γ − 1
60 where the prime denotes derivative with respect to x. The
x0 = 0.25 kr boundary conditions are
ki
40 g(0) = 0, g(1) = 0, g(x0 ) = 1, (16)
k
λ=∗ , (17b)
20 k γ (ePe − 1)
1
ζ = 4k − Pe∗2 . (17c)
0 2
0 20 40 60 80 100 The complete solution to (15) is
Pe
∗ Pe∗ x
g(x) = λePe x + e 2 (A cos ζ x + B sin ζ x). (18)
FIG. 4. Onset of oscillations in active porous media with increas-
ing Pe. The real (dots) and imaginary (circle) wave number k plotted To determine the constants A and B, we apply the boundary
as a function of Peclet number Pe for x0 = 0.05 (a), x0 = 0.25 (b), conditions
and x0 = 0.45 (c). For x0 = 0.25 [panel (b)], the oscillations appear
at Pe 20 where the first nonzero ki is found. Data points were g(0) = 0, g(1) = 0, g(x0 ) = 1, (19)
determined from fits to numerical data (Fig. 3) using Eq. (12). Thick which after substitution become
solid lines show results from the analytical solution in Eq. (21). Thin
dashed lines indicate the low-Pe limit in Eq. (24).
λ + A = 0, (20a)
∗ Pe∗
λePe + e 2 (A cos ζ + B sin ζ ) = 0, (20b)
to the steady state cs (x). However, if the advective transport ∗ Pe∗ x0
is sufficiently strong, advection can push the system into a λePe x0
+e 2 (A cos ζ x0 + B sin ζ x0 ) = 1. (20c)
state in which the concentration gradients become so great
that the concentration c(x0 ) overshoots its equilibrium value By eliminating A and B, we find an eigenvalue equation
as diffusion counteracts advection. The process repeats itself— for the wave number k:
∗
with a progressively smaller amplitude—until the steady state Pe∗ x0 Pe x0 sin ζ x0 Pe∗
λe 2 e 2 − cos ζ x0 + (cos ζ − e ) = 1.
2
is restored. sin ζ
(21)
B. Analytic solution To test the validity of our solution, we compared the
To rationalize the observed onset of oscillations at high predictions from Eq. (21) with numerical data. For a given
Peclet numbers (Figs. 3 and 4) and their dependence on the set of parameters (Pe,x0 ) we thus determined the solution to
system parameters, we proceed to consider the evolution of Eq. (21) with the smallest real part of k, corresponding to the
the perturbed system. Considering a small deviation from the slowest decaying mode. The solutions to Eq. (21) are in good
062608-4
TRANSIENT FLOWS IN ACTIVE POROUS MEDIA PHYSICAL REVIEW E 95, 062608 (2017)
(a) (a)
1 Pe = 1
Pe = 100 0.4
sin(πx)
Re(g)
0.5
x0
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0
x 0 20 40 60 80 100
(b) Pe
1 (b)
0.4
Im(g)
0.5
x0
0
0.2
062608-5
LEFTERIS I. KOSMIDIS AND KAARE H. JENSEN PHYSICAL REVIEW E 95, 062608 (2017)
oscillations in the flow within a channel linking two reservoirs the first half-period should be observable for this choice of
(Fig. 2). The oscillations in solute concentration and liquid parameters. For a slightly lower forcing Pe∗ = 2 (Pe 30), we
flow speed are the result of a coupling between solute find kr ∼ 30 and ki ∼ 10 corresponding to oscillation period
concentration c and the permeability of the channel, controlled Tosc 1300 s and decay time τ 200 s. For water flowing
by the swelling and shrinking of a stimulus-responsive material in a channel of width w = 300 μm and height h = 100 μm,
located at the position x0 in the channel. Damped oscilla- these flows would require pressure differentials of p = 0.077
tions occur when the advective transport ∼vc is sufficiently and 0.023 Pa, respectively [30]. These pressure differentials,
great to overcome diffusive transport ∼Dc/L, i.e., when in the absence of post valves, would generate flow velocities
the Peclet number Pe∗ = vL/D is greater than a critical v0 = PeD/L = 50 μm/s and v0 = 15 μm/s for Pe = 100 and
value, which varies in the range from Pe∗ 2 to Pe∗ 4, 30, respectively. However, due to the reduced conductance
depending on the location of the active porous material x0 imposed by the hydrogel structures, the effective velocity for
(Fig. 6). Pe∗ = 4 is v = 2 μm/s and for Pe∗ = 2 it is v = 1 μm/s,
To observe the damped oscillations in a laboratory setting, in accord with the geometric and flow-speed assumptions
we propose an experiment based on the system in Fig. 2. In a leading to the one-dimensional model in Eq. (2). In summary,
channel of length L = 1 mm, the characteristic diffusive time it does not appear technically unfeasible to experimentally
is td = L2 /D = 2 × 103 s, where we have used the diffusion validate the existence of damped oscillations in active porous
coefficient D = 5 × 10−10 m2 /s of the dye carboxyflourescein media.
[29]. With a stimulus-responsive hydrogel valve located at
x0 = 0.25 mm operated at a moderate Peclet number of
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Pe∗ = 4 (Pe = 100), we find kr ∼ 30 and ki ∼ 20. This
corresponds to an oscillation period of Tosc = 2π ki−1 td This work was supported by a research grant (13166) from
630 s while the decay time is τ = 3td kr−1 200 s. At least VILLUM FONDEN.
[1] M. C. Koetting, J. T. Peters, S. D. Steichen, and N. A. Peppas, [16] Q. Wu, L. Wang, H. Yu, J. Wang, and Z. Chen, Chem. Rev. 111,
Mater. Sci. Eng., R 93, 1 (2015). 7855 (2011).
[2] M. A. Zwieniecki, P. J. Melcher, and N. M. Holbrook, Science [17] P. Bernfeld and J. Wan, Science 142, 678 (1963).
291, 1059 (2001). [18] T. A. Horbett, J. Kost, and B. D. Ratner, Swelling Behavior
[3] D. L. Mullendore, C. W. Windt, H. Van As, and M. Knoblauch, of Glucose Sensitive Membranes, in Polymers as Biomaterials
The Plant Cell 22, 579 (2010). (Springer, Boston, 1984), pp. 193–207.
[4] M. R. Huglin, Brit. Polymer J. 21, 184 (1989). [19] L. A. Klumb and T. A. Horbett, J. Controll. Release 18, 59
[5] P. Gupta, K. Vermani, and S. Garg, Drug Discovery Today 7, (1992).
569 (2002). [20] A. S. Hoffman, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 65, 10 (2013), advanced
[6] L. A. Sharpe, A. M. Daily, S. D. Horava, and N. A. Peppas, Exp. Drug Delivery: Perspectives and Prospects.
Opin. Drug Delivery 11, 901 (2014). [21] Y. Qiu and K. Park, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 53, 321 (2001),
[7] L. A. Sharpe, A. M. Daily, S. D. Horava, and N. A. triggering in Drug Delivery Systems.
Peppas, Eur. J. Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics 50, 27 [22] Q. Wang, L. Wang, M. Detamore, and C. Berkland, Adv. Mater.
(2000). 20, 236 (2008).
[8] H.-Y. Park, I.-H. Song, J.-H. Kim, and W.-S. Kim, Int. J. [23] C. J. Bell, L. M. Carrick, J. Katta, Z. Jin, E. Ingham, A. Aggeli,
Pharmaceutics 175, 231 (1998). N. Boden, T. A. Waigh, and J. Fisher, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A
[9] A. W. Chan, R. A. Whitney, and R. J. Neufeld, 78A, 236 (2006).
Biomacromolecules 9, 2536 (2008). [24] M. Guvendiren, H. D. Lu, and J. A. Burdick, Soft Matter 8, 260
[10] A. W. Chan and R. J. Neufeld, Biomaterials 30, 6119 (2009). (2012).
[11] S. Y. Kim, S. M. Cho, Y. M. Lee, and S. J. Kim, J. Appl. Polym. [25] A. Gutowska, B. Jeong, and M. Jasionowski, Anatom. Rec. 263,
Sci. 78, 1381 (2000). 342 (2001).
[12] X. Qu, A. Wirsan, and A.-C. Albertsson, Polymer 41, 4589 [26] B. Choat, A. R. Cobb, and S. Jansen, New Phytologist 177, 608
(2000). (2008).
[13] D. Schmaljohann, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 58, 1655 (2006), [27] D. J. Beebe, J. S. Moore, J. M. Bauer, Q. Yu, R. H. Liu, C.
Supplementary Non-Thematic Collection. Devadoss, and B.-H. Jo, Nature (London) 404, 588 (2000).
[14] L. Klouda and A. G. Mikos, Eur. J. Pharmaceutics Biopharma- [28] T. Pedley and J. Fischbarg, J. Theor. Biol. 70, 427 (1978).
ceutics 68, 34 (2008), interactive Polymers for Pharmaceutical [29] N. J. Carroll, K. H. Jensen, S. Parsa, N. M. Holbrook, and D. A.
and Biomedical Applications. Weitz, Langmuir 30, 4868 (2014).
[15] S. Purushotham and R. Ramanujan, Acta Biomater. 6, 502 [30] H. Bruus, Theoretical Microfluidics (Oxford University Press,
(2010). Oxford, 2007).
062608-6