Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary
Pediatric hypertension too often goes undiagnosed and untreated because pediatricians fail
to comply with long-standing but cumbersome guidelines for blood pressure (BP) screening. This
memo explores some causes, contributing factors, and consequences of untreated hypertension, and
evaluates some benefits and options for improving pediatric screening. It concludes with the
recommendation that NC Medicaid require Prepaid Health Plans (PHPs) and providers to comply
with the BP screening guidelines beginning in 2020, and ensure compliance by adding a BP-specific
Untreated childhood hypertension can result in organ damage before adulthood (Tu, Eckert,
DiMeglio, Yu, & Jung, 2011) and has serious, long-term consequences, including a higher risk for
hypertension (Tu et al., 2011), stroke, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease during adulthood
(Lauer & Clarke, 1989). Pediatric hypertension is frequently undiagnosed, especially when mild to
moderate and not associated with an underlying disease (Bijlsma, Blufpand, Kaspers, & Bokenkamp,
2014; Brady, Solomon, Neu, Siberry, & Parekh, 2010; Hansen, Gunn, & Kaelber, 2007).
Blood pressure changes with height as a child grows, so there is not a single standard value
for pediatric BP as there is with adults; classifying pediatric BP is a two-step process using age- and
sex-specific standardized tables (Ogden et al., 2002). The most common reasons for failure to
diagnose elevated pediatric BP are failure to measure BP and height at the same visit, failure to use
the standardized tables to classify BP status, and pediatricians’ inability to define pediatric pre-
hypertension and hypertension (Bijlsma et al., 2014). Pediatricians also fail to diagnose elevated BP
in children when it is less than 120/80 mm Hg (the adult “normal” value); if the patient is of normal
weight for height, older, or male; and if the family history does not include cardiovascular disease
Reference tables must be used to correctly identify pediatric BP status because normal BP
values are incremental for every age and height and there are too many values to memorize. Pediatric
BP is not difficult to figure out: first, the sex-specific percentile of height-for-age is found, and then
the child’s BP reading is compared to normal BP for a child of the same height percentile, age, and
sex. Hypertension is diagnosed when the child’s BP reading is at or above the 95th percentile, and
pre-hypertension is diagnosed when it is at or above the 90th percentile or is below the 95th percentile
but over 120/80 mm Hg (either systolic BP is over 120 mm Hg or diastolic BP is over 80 mm Hg,
or both) (National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood
(Lurbe et al., 2009; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group, 2004), just
25% of pediatricians routinely measure BP in their patients, and only 35% of those who do take
measurements actually use the standardized tables to look up BP status (Bijlsma et al., 2014). This is
consistent with studies which found that 74% to 87% of pediatric hypertension cases were
undiagnosed before adulthood, even when the family history included hypertension (Bijlsma et al.,
The risk of undiagnosed and untreated hypertension is higher for low-income, immigrant,
and minority youth, who typically have both limited preventive health care and more psychosocial
and environmental stressors (Gundersen, Mahatmya, Garasky, & Lohman, 2011; Robl et al., 2013).
hypertension is 2% to 5% (McNiece et al., 2007; Sorof, Lai, Turner, Poffenbarger, & Portman,
2004), but these rates are for all ages, sexes, races and ethnicities, and do not account for differences
in socioeconomic status or other psychosocial risk factors. Specific prevalence rates for low-income
pediatric populations and separate rates for pre-teens and adolescents cannot be estimated with any
degree of confidence, however, some data specific to adolescents in North Carolina is available.
Analysis of nurse-measured height, weight, and BP for 573 adolescents (average age: 15.0
years) from a clinic serving low-income, ethnically diverse families in Guilford County, NC, found
that only 56.9% of adolescents had normal BP, while 25.7% had pre-hypertension and 17.5% had
hypertension. There were significant differences in BP between girls (n = 267) and boys (n = 306):
65.9% of girls had normal BP, 21.7% had pre-hypertension, and 12.3% had hypertension, but
among the boys, only 49.0% had normal BP, while 29.1% had pre-hypertension and 21.9% had
hypertension. Of note, BP status was not driven by weight: based on BMI percentiles, 59.5% of
adolescents were normal weight, 18.3% were overweight, and 22.2% were obese, with virtually
identical percentages of girls and boys in each weight category (Ewald, Bond, & Haldeman, 2017).
Early diagnosis and treatment of pediatric hypertension is both realistic and achievable, and
is particularly timely and relevant as NC transitions to a Medicaid Managed Care format. Early
and other chronic diseases, which would save money by reducing NC Medicaid long-term treatment
costs. Early diagnosis and treatment would be easy to implement and should have economic benefits
for PHPs because reducing pediatric hypertension will help with controlling high blood pressure in
Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18 to 85, which is one of the priority quality performance measures that
will be used to evaluate PHP’s performance and improvement (North Carolina Department of
Health and Human Services, 2018, p. 19). For Medicaid recipients, early diagnosis and treatment
would have both immediate and long-term health benefits, improve their overall quality of life, and
lessen the lifelong financial burden faced by those with chronic diseases.
Option 1: Maintain the Status Quo and Make No Changes to Quality Measures
This option assumes that all Medicaid pediatricians are following the guidelines for pediatric
BP screening at every well-child visit, including using the standardized tables to look up measured
BP values, and therefore does not make any changes to NC Medicaid, PHP, or provider processes,
quality measures, or reporting requirements. While this option is the simplest and does not require
any additional time or effort on the part of NC Medicaid, PHPs, or providers, in light of the finding
that only 13% to 26% of pediatricians follow existing guidance, it is highly unlikely that all Medicaid
pediatricians are fully compliant. Given that none of the 4 existing quality measures that track
pediatric visits specifically measure compliance with pediatric BP screening guidelines (numbers 34,
38, 39, and 40 on pp. 24-25; North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 2018),
there is no incentive to comply, so this option will most likely ensure the status quo: Medicaid
pediatric patients will continue to have undiagnosed and untreated hypertension, greater risk for
chronic diseases and higher medical costs in adulthood, and a lifetime of financial burdens.
Option 2: Gather 3 Years of Data Before Deciding About Changes to Quality Measures
This option asks PHPs and providers, beginning in 2020, to follow existing guidelines for
measuring and documenting pediatric BP at every well-child visit, including using the standardized
tables to look up measured BP values (which is considered standard of care), and to report their
findings for three years to NC Medicaid, but it does not make any immediate changes to PHP or
provider quality measures and does not penalize them for non-compliance. Assuming adequate
voluntary compliance, this option allows NC Medicaid to do two things: establish baseline
prevalence and incidence rates for pediatric hypertension in low-income NC youth, which currently
do not exist, and determine whether rates are high enough that there is a need to include a new
quality measure that would tie financial compensation to compliance with pediatric BP screening,
including documentation of assessment and any needed treatment. If added later, a BP-specific
quality measure would ensure that Medicaid pediatric patients with hypertension continue to get
early diagnosis and treatment, and that PHPs and providers who continue to comply with pediatric
Option 3: Require Pediatric Hypertension Screening and Add a New Quality Measure
This option, which assumes that most Medicaid pediatricians are not following the guidelines
for pediatric BP screening at every well-child visit, requires PHPs and providers to begin following
the guidelines for measuring and documenting BP in 2020 and adds a BP-specific quality measure to
ensure that PHPs and providers receive financial compensation for their time and efforts. Assuming
that prevalence rates for pediatric hypertension are higher in low-income Medicaid patients than the
national rates would suggest, this option requires PHPs and providers to report their findings to NC
Medicaid, and requires NC Medicaid to establish baseline pediatric hypertension prevalence and
incidence rates as well as benchmarks and target rates for future performance. While this option
requires additional time and effort initially on the part of NC Medicaid, PHPs, and providers,
consistently early diagnosis and treatment of pediatric hypertension will generate long-term savings
for NC Medicaid, provide financial compensation to PHPs and providers for achieving quality
measures, and reduce the lifelong health consequences and associated financial burden typically
Recommendation
The third option is the best overall, because it unambiguously supports early diagnosis of
pediatric hypertension, and is the only one that puts the needs of pediatric patients first. Early and
accurate diagnosis and treatment—or the lack thereof—will have the greatest impact on children’s
lives, and therefore must take priority over any short-term inconvenience. For PHPs and providers
who are already in compliance, the only impacts will be the reporting requirement and the quality
measure compensation, and for those not in compliance now, any temporary inconvenience will be
offset by improved metrics for patient care and health outcomes, as well as compensation.
Regular and repeated BP measurement is even more important than BMI screening, because
hypertension can occur with no obvious outer symptoms and BP status cannot be judged simply by
looking at a child. Standardized tables for BP status already exist, and NC Medicaid should put the
tables online and require providers’ use. Use of the BP tables should be a criterion for the new BP
quality measure, just as assessment of BMI percentile is a component of the existing BMI quality
measure (number 3 on p. 15; North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 2018).
Governor Cooper needs to direct the NC Department of Health and Human Services to
make early diagnosis and treatment of pediatric hypertension a priority and to make compliance with
BP screening guidelines mandatory for all NC Medicaid PHPs and providers. The NC Department
of Health and Human Services needs to create a new quality measure to evaluate whether BP status
is assessed and documented by PHPs or providers during the measurement year, and develop the
baseline, benchmark, and target criteria to determine if a PHP or provider is achieving necessary
improvements in patient health outcomes over time. The children most at risk of undiagnosed
pediatric hypertension due to low income are those most likely to be served by the NC Medicaid
program. Early diagnosis and treatment of pediatric hypertension is entirely within the scope of the
new NC Medicaid managed care program, if the political will exists to ensure compliance.
References
Bijlsma, M. W., Blufpand, H. N., Kaspers, G. J., & Bokenkamp, A. (2014). Why pediatricians fail to
Brady, T. M., Solomon, B. S., Neu, A. M., Siberry, G. K., & Parekh, R. S. (2010). Patient-, provider-,
125(6), e1286-e1293.
Ewald, D. R., Bond, S. H., & Haldeman, L. A. (2017). Hypertension in low-income adolescents.
Gundersen, C., Mahatmya, D., Garasky, S., & Lohman, B. (2011). Linking psychosocial stressors and
Hansen, M. L., Gunn, P. W., & Kaelber, D. C. (2007). Underdiagnosis of hypertension in children
Lauer, R. M., & Clarke, W. R. (1989). Childhood risk factors for high adult blood pressure: The
Lurbe, E., Cifkova, R., Cruickshank, J. K., Dillon, M. J., Ferreira, I., Invitti, C., . . . Zanchetti, A.
McNiece, K. L., Poffenbarger, T. S., Turner, J. L., Franco, K. D., Sorof, J. M., & Portman, R. J.
150(6), 640-644.e641.
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in
Children and Adolescents. (2004). The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and
treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 114(2), 555-576.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Medicaid managed care
proposed concept paper: Provider health plan quality performance and accountability (pp. 1-31).
Ogden, C. L., Kuczmarski, R. J., Flegal, K. M., Mei, Z., Guo, S., Wei, R., . . . Johnson, C. L. (2002).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts for the United States:
Improvements to the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics version. Pediatrics, 109(1),
45-60.
Robl, M., de Souza, M., Schiel, R., Gellhaus, I., Zwiauer, K., Holl, R. W., & Wiegand, S. (2013). The
key role of psychosocial risk on therapeutic outcome in obese children and adolescents:
Sorof, J. M., Lai, D., Turner, J., Poffenbarger, T., & Portman, R. J. (2004). Overweight, ethnicity,
Tu, W., Eckert, G. J., DiMeglio, L. A., Yu, Z., & Jung, J. (2011). Intensified effect of adiposity on