Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PBMEO Vs PBM Co Inc Case Digest
PBMEO Vs PBM Co Inc Case Digest
Philippine Blooming
Mills Co., Inc. and Court of Industrial Relations (1973)
Facts – Union officers of the Philippine Blooming Mills Co. Inc. (PBM) were
dismissed for allegedly violating the no strike-no lockout provision of their
collective bargaining agreement (CBA) after staging a mass demonstration at
Malacañang.
But a day before the demonstration, PBM said the rally should not prejudice normal
office operations, thus employees without prior filing of a leave of absence who fail
to report for the first and regular shifts on March 4 shall be dismissed for violating
their CBA.
However, union officers said there was no violation because the demonstration was
against the Pasig police and not the company. They added that the rally was an
exercise of their freedom of speech.
PBMEO filed a motion for reconsideration, which CIR dismissed the motion for
passing two days late from the 10-day deadline the court allowed.
Issue – Whether or not CIR and PBM Co. Inc. violated PBMEO’s freedom of
expression and assembly on the grounds that PBM Co. illegally dismissed its
employees for participating in a mass demonstration.
Held – VIOLATED. The rally was not against the company and therefore there is no
violation of the “no strike-no lockout” provision of their CBA. To charge PBMEO of
bargaining in bad faith extends the jurisdiction of the CBA and inhibits freedom of
speech. The company failed to protect its employees from the Pasig police’s abuse of
power, went to the extent of dismissing their employees, and instead prioritized
material losses. Moreover, CIR could have easily accepted the motion for
reconsideration. Procedural rules do not supersede the Constitution and may be
overruled in a bid to achieve justice, especially in cases of free speech.
Concepts and Terminologies