Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) consists of a finite list of foods and beverages
with response categories to indicate usual frequency of consumption over the time period
queried. To assess the total diet, the number of foods and beverages queried typically ranges
from 80 to 120. Usual portion size can be asked separately for each food and beverage.
Alternatively, portion size can be combined with frequency information by asking respondents
to translate usual consumption amount to number of specified units. FFQs are usually self-
administered. The purpose of using FFQ is to obtain frequency, portion size information about
food and beverage consumption over a specified period of time, typically the past month or
year. The (FFQ) is one of the most commonly used methods in epidemiological studies to
assess long-term nutritional exposure (Shahar, 2003).
Objective
1. To explore the 3-day dietary recall method and food frequency questionnaire method
in the assessment of dietary intake in a person.
2. To analyze the 3-day food recall and food frequency questionnaire using the food
composition tables and/or diet analysis software.
Materials
Procedure
1. 3-Day Dietary Recall accompanying the instruction was familiarized before beginning
of the recall.
a. One food item per line in the recall form was recalled.
b. Food item eaten, the way it was cooked and the amount that was eaten was
described as specific as possible.
c. The amount in household measurement, for example, ounces, tablespoon, cups,
slices, units, etc was recorded.
d. The normal diet during the period you keep the record was not altered.
2. The subject’s food and beverage intakes for 2 weekdays (Monday through Friday) and
1 weekend day (Saturday or Sunday) was interviewed.
3. The 3-day food recall by food composition tables and/or representative website
(http://www.nutriweb.org.my/) were analyzed. The food composition tables were found
in the Food Atlas book by Shahar et al. (2009) at the UCSI library.
4. Dietary analysis was encompassed with macro and micronutrient determination.
Percentage of energy contributing from macronutrients were specified.
5. The nutrient intake with the Recommended Nutrient Intakes for Malaysians (2017) was
compared.
1. The FFQ accompanying the instruction was familiarized before beginning of the recall.
a. For each food item listed, one column that describes how often you consume that
item was chosen.
b. Each question was completed as accurate as you can.
2. The subject’s food and beverage intakes into the FFQ given was interviewed and
recorded.
3. The FFQ by food composition tables and/or representative website
(http://www.nutriweb.org.my/) was analyzed. The food composition tables were found
in the Food Atlas Book by Shahar et al. (2009) at the UCSI library.
4. The nutrient intake with the Recommended Nutrient Intakes for Malaysians (2005) was
compared.
5. The food consumption frequency score of each food item using the Reaburn formula
was calculated.
Calculations
Tomatoes 2 pieces
Tofu 1 piece
Spinach 1 cup
Date: 6/2/2020
Date: 7/2/2020
Date: 8/2/2020
Milo 1 cup
Spaghetti 1 bowl
Banana 1 serving
Spinach 1 cup
Date: 7/2/2020
Biscuits 3 pieces
Rice 1 bowl
Date: 8/2/2020
Meal Location Foods & Beverages Quantity measurements
Breakfast Home Roti canai with daul 1 piece
Coke 1 cup
Date: 6/2/2020
Date: 8/2/2020
Macronutrients
1283.681+1229.663+1521.617+1435.684+1436.514
Average kilocalories from 4 persons = 5
= 1382.432kcal
Fiber
13.056+13.398+6.184+10.131+ 12.958
Average weight of micronutrients = = 11.145g
5
RNI = 25 g/day
11.145
Average percentage of fiber intake of 5 persons = ×100% = 44.58%
25
Micronutrients
Table: Average percentage of micronutrients intake from 4 persons.
Micronutrients Average intake from 4 persons RNI (mg/daily) Percentage (%)
(mg)
Calcium 535.236+344.115+286.512+476.507+ 1000 499.457
854.917 ×100%
1000
5
= 49.946%
= 499.457
Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) Adapted from MANS Study (Norimah et al., 2008)
(100%𝑥3)
Bacon = = 60%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Luncheon meat = = 60%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(80%𝑥4)
Pork = = 84%
5
(100%𝑥2)
Canned fish = = 40%
5
(40%𝑥3)+(60%𝑥2)
Shellfish = = 48%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Fresh prawn = = 48%
5
(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Fresh cuttlefish = = 48%
5
(20%𝑥3)+(80%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Dried cuttlefish = = 48%
5
(20%𝑥3)+(80%𝑥2)
Crab = = 44%
5
(80%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Salted fish = = 56%
5
(60%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥1)
Fish ball = = 64%
5
(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)+(40%𝑥1)
Fish nugget/keropok lekor = = 36%
5
D. Eggs
(100%𝑥5)
Hen egg = = 100%
5
(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Duck egg = = 48%
5
(100%𝑥1)
Turtle egg = = 20%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥1)
Salted egg = = 56%
5
H. Fruits
(60%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Papaya = = 68%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Guava = = 56%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)
Lime = = 68%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Mango = = 64%
5
(80%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Pineapple = = 56%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)
Banana = = 72%
5
(60%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥2)
Watermelon = = 64%
5
(40%𝑥2)+(60%𝑥1)
Starfruit = = 28%
5
(60%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Jackfruit = = 52%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(80%𝑥3)
Apple = = 68%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(20%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Orange = = 68%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Pear = = 56%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Grape = = 56%
5
(100%𝑥2)
Durian = = 40%
5
(100%𝑥2)
Rambutan = = 40%
5
(20%𝑥3)+(60%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Longan = = 40%
5
(40%𝑥2)+(60%𝑥1)
Lychee = = 28%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Honeydew = = 60%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(80%𝑥1)
Canned fruit = = 32%
5
(40%𝑥3)+(60%𝑥2)
Dried fruit = = 48%
5
I. Beverages
(100%𝑥5)
Filted water = = 100%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(60%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)
Tea = = 80%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥1)
Coffee = = 60%
5
(40%𝑥5)+(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Chocolate drinks = = 58%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥2)
Malted drinks = = 60%
5
(100%𝑥2)
Cordial drinks = = 40%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Fruit juice = 60%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Carbonated drinks = = 56%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥2)
Soybean milk = = 56%
5
(80%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)
Herbal drinks = = 76%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Energy drinks = = 54%
5
J. Alcoholic drinks
(20%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)+(60%𝑥1)
Shandy = = 32%
5
(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)+(40%𝑥1)
Beer = = 36%
5
(20%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)+(60%𝑥1)
Wine = = 32%
5
(20%𝑥2)+(80%𝑥1)
Rectified spirit = = 24%
5
(40%𝑥2)+(60%𝑥1)
Likeur = = 28%
5
K. Confectionery
(40%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)
Traditional Malaysian Kuih = = 52%
5
(60%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)
Plain cake = = 52%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(80%𝑥4)
Biscuits = = 84%
5
(80%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Sweets = = 56%
5
(100%𝑥3)
Ice cream = = 60%
5
(40%𝑥3)+(60%𝑥2)
Air batu campur = = 48%
5
(80%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Jelly = = 36%
5
(20%𝑥5)+(40%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Snacks = = 72%
5
L. Spreads
(20%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Jam = = 48%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)+(40%𝑥2)+(20%𝑥1)
Kaya = = 48%
5
(100%𝑥4)
Butter = = 80%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)
Margarine = = 52%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Peanut butter = = 60%
5
(20%𝑥2)+(80%𝑥1)
Cheese spread = = 24%
5
M. Miscellaneous
(100%𝑥5)
Sugar = = 100%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Honey = = 60%
5
(20%𝑥4)+(60%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥1)
Sambal belacan = = 56%
5
(20%𝑥2)+(80%𝑥1)
Budu = = 24%
5
(100%𝑥3)
Cencalok = = 60%
5
(100%𝑥4)
Dark soy sauce = = 80%
5
(100%𝑥5)
Light soy sauce = = 100%
5
(80%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)
Tomato/Chilli sauce = = 36%
5
(60%𝑥5)+(20%𝑥4)+(20%𝑥3)
Oyster sauce = = 88%
5
(40%𝑥4)+(40%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Fish sauce = = 64%
5
(80%𝑥3)+(20%𝑥2)
Petis/heko/otak udang = = 56%
5
Dietary intake has been linked to important health outcomes, including several of the
leading causes of death (e.g., cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes). To fully administer
dietary intake, many methods have been assessed including food record etc. In this particular
experiment, 24-hours food recall is used to assess dietary intake (To obtain detailed information
about all foods and beverages consumed on a given day.) (George et al., 2016) A 24-hour
dietary recall (24HR) is a structured interview intended to capture detailed information about
all foods and beverages (and possibly, dietary supplements) consumed by the respondent in the
past 24 hours, most commonly, from midnight to midnight the previous day. A key feature of
the 24HR is that, when the time is appropriate, the respondent can be asked for more detailed
information than first reported. For example, a respondent reporting chicken for dinner or a
sandwich for lunch would be asked about the preparation method and type of bread. This open-
ended response structure is designed to prompt respondents to provide a comprehensive and
detailed report of all foods and beverages consumed. In addition to other detailed descriptors,
such as time of day and source of food, portion size of each food and beverage is also captured.
Food models, pictures, and other visual aids may be used to help respondents judge and report
portion size and may improve accuracy. Dietary recalls typically ask about foods and beverages
first, before questions on dietary supplements. A 24HR usually requires 20 to 60 minutes to
complete. The data will then be calculated and used to assess total dietary intake and/or
particular aspects of the diet as it yields detailed information on foods and beverages consumed
on a given day. If these data are linked to a nutrient composition database (in this experiment,
we are using Nutritionist Pro Software), nutrient intake such as macronutrients from foods and
beverages can be determined. Moreover, 24HRs can also be used to describe a population's
intake.
A total of 4 male respondents took part in this specific 24HR which lasted for a whole
3 days. Their data were entered as a form into the Nutritionist Pro Software and nutrient intakes
from those foods and beverages were calculated and tabulated. According to the table above,
it can be seen that the average of kilocalories from 4 persons is 1382.432 kcal, lower than the
calorie intake recommended by the Malaysian Dietary Guidelines. In contrast, the calorie
intake recommendations by the Malaysian Dietary Guidelines 2010 for male adults (aged 18-
59 years) is 2000 kcal per day. 4 male respondents were able to maintain their weight as they
didn’t exceed the calories limit while able to sustain their basic lifestyle with the energy
supplied from their foods.
For macronutrients, the average percentage of calories of carbohydrates obtained from
5 persons is 48.21%, lower than what it states in the Malaysian Dietary Guidelines, counted as
inadequate intake. The Malaysian RNI recommends that total carbohydrate should contribute
55% to 70% of total calorie intake. A deficiency of carbohydrates could lead
to ketosis, excessive breakdown of protein, fatigue and a decreased energy level as well as
reduced fiber intake (Manninen, 2004). Moving on the table, the average percentage of calories
of proteins is 18.92%. Malaysian RNI recommends that protein should contribute to only 10-
15% of total calorie intake. In this case, however, seems that all 4 of us exceeded the limit
when it comes to consuming protein intake. Over intake of protein could cause protein-induced
hypercalciuria which will lead to the formation of calcium kidney stones (Delimaris, 2013). As
for fat, average percentage of calories is 33.64%, more than what the Malaysian RNI
recommends (20-30%), classified as excessive intake of fats. It may be due to the fact that one
of the respondents have been digging in fast foods over the course of the 3 days, causing the
entire average percentage to rise up. An increased risk of obesity and eventually hypertension
is tied with having an over intake of fats in diets. An average weight of fiber is calculated, and
the following results (11.145g) is lower than the RNI amount of 25g, rendering it inadequate
intake. Looking back the 24HR food recall table, it can be seen that the intake of vegetables, a
dominant source of fibers is extremely low, hence the low fiber intake.
For micronutrients, the average calcium intake from 4 persons is 499.457mg.
According to Malaysian RNI 2005, the requirement intake is 800mg/day, hence it’s inadequate
intake. Inadequate calcium intake is a possible risk factor of osteoporosis (Yoon et al., 2016).
The average iron intake from 4 persons is 12.207mg. The amount of iron in food and its
bioavailability in different diets were also taken into consideration. Malaysian RNI
recommends 9-14mg/day on a bioavailability from 10-15%. So according to it, the average
iron intake from 4 person is right well-balanced. For zinc, the average zinc intake from 4
persons is 6.016mg, slightly than the proposed RNI of 6.7mg, inadequate intake it
is. Zinc deficiency often causes hair loss, diarrhea, delayed sexual maturation, impotence,
hypogonadism in males, and eye and skin lesions. The average magnesium intake from 4
persons is 167.337mg, a steep lower than the recommended 400mg/day for a 21 years old adult,
rendering it inadequate intake. Magnesium deficiency is related to factors that promote
headaches, including neurotransmitter release and vasoconstriction (Sun-edelstein & Mauskop
2009). Early signs of magnesium deficiency include loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, fatigue,
and weakness. As magnesium deficiency worsens, numbness, tingling, muscle contractions
and cramps, seizures, personality changes, abnormal heart rhythms, and coronary spasms can
occur (Rude, 2010). The average sodium intake from 4 of us is 2285.405mg, higher than the
recommended intake of 1500mg/day, making it excessive intake. Excess sodium increases
blood pressure because it holds excess fluid in the body, and that creates an added burden on
the heart. Too much sodium will increase your risk of stroke, heart failure, osteoporosis,
stomach cancer and kidney disease. We should always keep our dietary intakes in line with the
recommended nutrient intake (RNI), so that we wouldn’t have to face with risks associated
with excessive or inadequate intakes. For example, we should limit our intake on fast foods as
it contains high amount of fats and sodium which when excessive is not healthy.
However, use of self-reported, 24-hour dietary recalls for estimating dietary intake has
received a great deal of previous attention as it is prone to errors. Among the well-recognized
methodological challenges associated with 24-hour recalls is the issue of reliability. Low
reliability is due to both variations in diet across days as well as inaccuracy in reporting.
Reliability is important for dietary assessment because less-reliable estimates have more error
and are therefore less likely to show effects of interventions or show the influence of key
important predictors.
Food frequency questionnaire is one of the common dietary method to determine the relation
between the diet and health problem. FFQ is suitable for study in large scale of population
because it is easy to operate and low cost. Bias, random and systemic error might occur in FFQ
and cause the food record might not represent the habitual food intake. (Sauvageot et al., 2013)
Based on the result of food consumption frequency score by using the Reaburn formula,
the top 10 highest scored food are the white rice, hen egg, filtered water, sugar, light soy sauce,
white bread, chicken, green leafy vegetable, oyster sauce, instant noodles, fresh milk and
biscuits. The score for white rice, hen egg, filtered water, sugar and light soy sauce are 100%.
The score for white bread, chicken, green leafy vegetable and oyster sauce are 88%. The
number of food is exceed 10 because of instant noodle, fresh milk and biscuits are ranked as
top 10 as their score are the same which is the 84%. The top 10 lowest score food are the turtle
egg, budu, cheese spread, rectified spirit, likeur, lychee, starfruit, sago, tempeh, baby corn,
shandy, wine. The score for the turtle egg is 20% and it is the least food that had been consumed.
The score for the budu, cheese spread and rectified spirit are 24%. The score for likeur, lychee
and starfruit are 28%. The number of food exceed 10 again because of the score for sago,
tempeh, baby corn, shandy and wine are the same which is 32%.
From the score, we can find out that the subjects consume a lot of grains and grain
product including white rice, white bread, instant noodle and biscuit. White rice and white
bread are the food that consume the most because of white rice and white bread are the main
carbohydrate sources for the subjects. Instant noodle and biscuit also obtain a high score may
because of food for the subjects to consume when they are rushing of academic matters as the
subjects are university students. Both instant noodle and biscuit can be purchase and prepared
easily. Four of these foods are made from refined grains. Refined grains only contains small
amount of protein with lots of rapidly digested starch. It is because of the bran and germ which
are contain dietary fiber, vitamins B, vitamins E and trace minerals are removed during the
refining process (Steffen et al., 2003). Refined carbohydrates are high in the glycemic index
and it does not promote long-term of fullness causing the people easily feel hungry after having
their meal. Hence, the risk of obesity and overeating are increased. (Roberts., 2003). Filtered
water is the main water source for the subjects. Filtered water is water that free from
contamination and unwanted smell. Sufficient consumption of filtered water help in hydrating
the skin, maintaining the skin health and detoxification of the body (Drinkfiltered.com, 2020).
Chicken and fresh milk are the common source of protein in Malaysia. Chicken contain lower
saturated fats compared to the red meat such as pork and beef. It is also a great source of
selenium which is an antioxidant that possessed positive effect on inflammatory and
cardiovascular diseases (Marangoni et al., 2015). Fresh milk providing high-quality protein,
calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and vitamin K. These nutrients are all beneficial in
maintaining the bone health and help in preventing osteoporosis. High quality protein also help
in maintaining long-term fullness which preventing overeating and the risk of getting type 2
diabetes. (Thorning et al., 2016). Green leafy vegetables are food can be commonly find either
standalone or combination with other food. Green leafy vegetables are rich in dietary fiber,
lutein, folate and β-carotene. Dietary fiber can help in preventing constipation. Lutein, folate
and β-carotene may have the effects of slowing the declination of cognitive abilities when in
the elderly stages. (Morris et al., 2018). Sugar, light soy sauce and oyster sauces are the
common seasoning ingredient in Chinese cuisine. Light soy sauce and oyster sauces have high
sodium content. High sugar and sodium intake will increase the risk of getting chronic heart
diseases and hypertension.
From the score, all of the subjects do not have any of turtle egg consumption. The reason
is because turtle consumption is banned in Sabah and Sarawak, Malaysia. Malaysia is also
planning to has a complete ban in trade and consumption of turtle eggs in peninsular Malaysia.
Budu is an anchiovies sauce and it is not familiar in Chinese cuisine in Malaysia. Budu is high
in sodium content which will cause the high blood pressure (Mohd Khairi et al., 2014). Cheese
spread is not popular in Asian countries compared to Western countries. Malaysian also does
not have the habit of eating cheese spread. Hence, the score for the cheese spread is low. Cheese
is rich in casein, calcium and zinc. Cheese is also high in fat. Cheese has positive effect on
maintaining the health of teeth. High of fats in cheese may increasing the saturated fat lead to
the chronic cardiovascular diseases (Gouda et al., 2003). Rectified spirit, likeur, shandy and
wine are alcoholic drinks. Since the subjects are students, they does not consume much of the
alcohol contained drinks. Alcoholic drinks contain contaminants such as nitrosamines,
mycotoxins and arsenic compounds which are carcinogenic. Alcoholic drinks especially wine
also contain of the anticarcinogenic and antioxidation compounds such as polyphenols and
flavonoids. Alcoholic drinks is also high in carbohydrates, over consumption may increase the
risk of diabetes (Bandera et al., 2006). Lychee and starfruit are the less common tropical fruit
consumed by Malaysian. Both fruit is rich in vitamin C. Vitamin C is an antioxidant, also help
in absorption of iron and formation of collagen (Peters et al., 2007). Baby corn is less consumed
by the subjects might be the demographic and geographic factors. Baby corn is a good source
of protein, carbohydrates, crude fiber and dietary fiber. High in fiber content help to promote
the health of the intestines (Hooda et al., 2013). Sago is a rare food in the normal university
life. Sago is high in carbohydrate especially in amylose content and almost low in other
nutrients. Amylose with long chain will required longer time to digest, beneficial in controlling
the cholesterol level. Tempeh is the fermented soybean product, which is more popular in
vegetarian. Low score for tempeh may due to the pungent smell of tempeh and the meat
preferable. Tempeh contains proteins and isoflavones which already proved to has positive
effect on the gastrointestinal tracts. (Mani et al., 2017).
Questions
1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the 24 hour diet recall and Food
Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ)?
The advantages using 24 hour diet recall is it can record detailed information on food intake
such as the average energy, macronutrient, micronutrient of the food and it is quick and easy
while the disadvantages of 24 hour diet recall is it does not represent the usual intake of the
individual, it might prone to underestimation due to inaccurate recall of the individual.
The advantages of Food Frequency Questionnaire is inexpensive, more representative of the
usual intake of the individual and easy to use while the disadvantages using FFQ is it required
a long questionnaire, it may not represent the usual portion size chosen by the respondents and
it is highly prone to overestimation due to the intake can be compromised when multiple foods
grouped together (Tucker, 2007).
The cases can be determined by qualitative method and quantitative method. Qualitative
method is using the food pyramid and basic food groups methods. It is used to determine the
number of serving from each group and compare with the minimum requirement. The other
method which is quantitative method is used to estimate the amount of energy and specific
nutrients in each food consumed. It is more expensive and time consuming and it depends on
the honesty of the individual. These two methods can used to observe the nutrients loss during
storage or preparation, the completeness food database and avoiding mistake in coding which
can lead to under reporting of the measurements.
Conclusion
In conclusion, 24 hours dietary recall and Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) are type of dietary
assessment methods to determine dietary intake of the human. Both methods do not fully represent
the dietary intake due to the random errors. The results taken from the 24 hours dietary recall and
food frequency questionnaire is used to predict the relation of the appropriate nutrient intake and
the possibilities of getting disease.
References
Anon, 2020. 24-hour Dietary Recall (24HR) At a Glance | Dietary Assessment Primer. [Online]
Available at: https://dietassessmentprimer.cancer.gov/profiles/recall/ [Accessed 8 Feb.
2020].
Bandera, E. and Kushi, L., 2006. Alcohol and Cancer. Nutritional Oncology, pp.219-272.
Delimaris, I., 2013. Adverse effects associated with protein intake above the recommended
dietary allowance for adults. ISRN nutrition, 2013.
De Keyzer, W., Huybrechts, I., De Vriendt, V., Vandevijvere, S., Slimani, N., Van Oyen, H.
and De Henauw, S., 2011. Repeated 24-hour recalls versus dietary records for
estimating nutrient intakes in a national food consumption survey. Food & nutrition
research, 55(1), p.7307.
Drinkfiltered.com. 2020. The Health Benefits Of Drinking Filtered Water - Drink Filtered.
[online] Available at: https://www.drinkfiltered.com/posts/the-health-benefits-of-
drinking-filtered-water [Accessed 25 Feb. 2020].
George, S.M.S., Van Horn, M.L., Lawman, H.G. and Wilson, D.K., 2016. Reliability of 24-
hour dietary recalls as a measure of diet in African-American youth. Journal of the
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(10), pp.1551-1559.
Gouda, A. and Abou El-Nour, A., 2003. CHEESES | Processed Cheese. Encyclopedia of Food
Sciences and Nutrition, pp.1108-1115.
Hooda, S. and Kawatra, A., 2013. Nutritional evaluation of baby corn (zea mays). Nutrition &
Food Science.
Mani, V. and Ming, L.C., 2017. Tempeh and Other Fermented Soybean Products Rich in
Isoflavones. In Fermented Foods in Health and Disease Prevention (pp. 453-474).
Academic Press.
Marangoni, F., Corsello, G., Cricelli, C., Ferrara, N., Ghiselli, A., Lucchin, L. and Poli, A.,
2015. Role of poultry meat in a balanced diet aimed at maintaining health and wellbeing:
an Italian consensus document. Food & nutrition research, 59(1), p.27606.
Mohd Khairi, I.N.B., Huda, N., Wan Abdullah, W.N. and Al-Kharki, A.F.M., 2014. Protein
quality of fish fermented product: Budu and rusip. Asia Pacific Journal of Sustainable
Agriculture, Food and Energy, 2(2), pp.17-22.
Morris, M.C., Wang, Y., Barnes, L.L., Bennett, D.A., Dawson-Hughes, B. and Booth, S.L.,
2018. Nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables and cognitive decline:
Prospective study. Neurology, 90(3), pp.e214-e222.
Peters, P. and Schaefer, C., 2007. Vitamins, minerals, and trace elements. Drugs During
Pregnancy and Lactation, pp.467-484.
Roberts, S.B., 2003. Glycemic index and satiety. Nutrition in clinical care: an official
publication of Tufts University, 6(1), pp.20-26.
Rude RK, 2010. Magnesium. In: Coates PM, Betz JM, Blackman MR, Cragg GM, Levine M,
Moss J, White JD (eds). Encyclopedia of Dietary Supplements. 2(2), pp. 527-537.
Sauvageot, N., Alkerwi, A., Albert, A. and Guillaume, M., 2013. Use of food frequency
questionnaire to assess relationships between dietary habits and cardiovascular risk
factors in NESCAV study: validation with biomarkers. Nutrition Journal, 12(1).
Shahar, D., Shai, I., Vardi, H., Brener-Azrad, A. and Fraser, D., 2003. Development of a semi-
quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to assess dietary intake of
multiethnic populations. European journal of epidemiology, 18(9), pp.855-861.
Steffen, L.M., Jacobs Jr, D.R., Stevens, J., Shahar, E., Carithers, T. and Folsom, A.R., 2003.
Associations of whole-grain, refined-grain, and fruit and vegetable consumption with
risks of all-cause mortality and incident coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke:
the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. The American journal of
clinical nutrition, 78(3), pp.383-390.
Sun-Edelstein, C. and Mauskop, A., 2009. Foods and supplements in the management of
migraine headaches. The Clinical journal of pain, 25(5), pp.446-452.
Thorning, T.K., Raben, A., Tholstrup, T., Soedamah-Muthu, S.S., Givens, I. and Astrup, A.,
2016. Milk and dairy products: good or bad for human health? An assessment of the
totality of scientific evidence. Food & nutrition research, 60(1), p.32527.
Tucker, K.L., 2007. Assessment of usual dietary intake in population studies of gene–diet
interaction. Nutrition, metabolism and cardiovascular diseases, 17(2), pp.74-81.
Yoon, D.S., Lee, Y.K., Ha, Y.C. and Kim, H.Y., 2016. Inadequate dietary calcium and vitamin
D intake in patients with osteoporotic fracture. Journal of bone metabolism, 23(2),
pp.55-61.