Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U13769257
MH611 A1 Feo
In Garth Paine’s “Acoustic Ecology 2.0,” he argues for the need for both resurgence and
cohesiveness in the field of acoustic ecology. Whereas R. Murray Schafer strives for awareness
of the sonic environment through focused attention to particular sound events, Paine stresses a
shift in focus towards the interaction between sounds through time. Paine also notes that Schafer
aims to recede to past times, in which the sonic environment is dominated by biophony and
geophony instead of anthropophony. Paine suggests a need to rework this line of thinking and
instead of outright reducing sounds of anthropophony, he calls for an increase in urban planning
with greater acoustic considerations. This viewpoint differs from Schafer’s by acknowledging
that human made sounds are equally important, but needs to have a rebalanced role in the
environment. In order to implement the societal framework to affect this change, he proposes
“The Listenn Project” in which there is a community of listeners that observe how the sonic
environments in national park areas changes over time. This project is intended to increase
community engagement while also generating further research to inform acoustic design to
With the fundamental values of acoustic ecology being laid out by the pioneer of the
field, R. Murray Schafer, Paine argues for a need to rethink and revitalize aspects of Schafer’s
ideas in order to create a strong sense of societal change. One thing of interest in his arguments is
how Paine has absorbed and expanded Schafer’s ideas to address the core values of the term
“acoustic ecology” in itself. The term ecology is defined by the interaction between the
environment and the inhabitants of the environment. Paine stresses the importance of not just the
sound event, but how different sound events interact with each other amongst the environment.
Jonathan Yeoh
U13769257
MH611 A1 Feo
When Schafer discusses the relationship between sounds, it is more about the growing
prominence of anthropocentric sonic events overpowering the natural world, whereas Paine
discusses a more nuanced approach in how the physical presence of different organisms in the
environment affect the degree of acoustic reverberation in the environment. When Schafer first
brought up the concerns about the changing sonic environment, climate change was not nearly as
prominent of an issue as it is in today’s societal psyche. Now with many areas feeling the effects
of climate change, we can begin to see how it has also affected the respective soundscapes. The
sonic environment shifts towards more sound reverberation as opposed to sound absorption due
to the diminishing biodiversity. This creates a more lo-fi sonic environment according to Schafer
and would diminish our ability to distinguish different sounds, further emphasizing Paine’s
opinion that focus must be shifted on the interactions within the sonic environment. This applies
One key aspect that is central to any field of environmentalism is the need for societal
awareness of these issues, which is certainly an avenue that is explored thoroughly by Schafer
and Paine. In order to achieve this, they both propose a multitude of ways that focus on
individual engagement leading to societal engagement. While Schafer does this through his
research, compositional works, and educational ideas, Paine attempts to restructure these ideas to
focus more on personal experience to build an intrinsic desire for environmental stewardship. By
doing this, his research holds greater potential to create a strong sense of engagement. He talks
about the impact of experiential listening, and how this creates a deeper understanding of the
sonic environment. However, the primary caveat of his proposed “Listenn Project” is that it
already requires the volunteer to have a strong connection or interest with the sonic environment
Jonathan Yeoh
U13769257
MH611 A1 Feo
and ultimately could be further reaching. I believe that in order to affect greater social change we
must emphasize the value of the sonic world through educational systems, in which Schafer has
written extensively about. This would foster the awareness needed for the sonic environment.
One merit about the Listenn Project is how the extensive database that stems from community
contributions can be used to help greater inform urban planning with acoustic considerations
through the sheer volume of recordings that can be referred to, ultimately increasing quality of
life.
It is important to note that Schafer’s contributions to the field of acoustic ecology can not
be understated; but can certainly be revitalized and reapplied in a variety of ways to expand its
societal impact upon the community. Through Paine’s proposed projects, he ultimately aims to
deepen the individual connection and awareness to the sonic environment, but can still aim for a