Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
Alef-Shah Zadran
:J
Department of Anthropology
State University of New York at Buffalo
4242 Ridge Lea Road
Amherst, New York 14226
~~ .
"
;t
v,f
~ ,~. .;:
~
~ - .. • -
~I
~ .~ ~ .,
·~ .,
'. .; "
"
. , ~ .\ .,, ~
"
"
,
. . .. ,,
J
.,.,
.
Z>
0'
~
.,
I
I
,
'-.
~ . ..
~ J ;!--
,« .,
" , .
; .:=, , , n,
1
j : , I 1
~
"
~ "0 'i
%
..
?, ~ .
1
.j
1
; I , ., "
.
1 ~
1 V
,
. ..
«
<
"
..~I., .. .. ..
1
, > . "
,
;;
.. "
'"
· . .. . ,
" '
.., '! ! ., ;;
~
;;
" '. .. ~ 0
" ..
.," " ", "'" .-"
~
!!
.. ~ ~ 0 0
~ N
" 2 " " ;0:
~ ;; ., ~
:':1
i 0
.:f n
:
~:
,
\: ~l
u
f
. !·
n
~
"
·· t
-" ,
.+
i
\
I'
......';;'.
l
,-
,~
;
.\, -
~
"..... - - .... \
"'?,\ I
, \
• ,_ .... ;'t ........
I
I
,
,,
"
,
- .. ~
l.
'
;:i
"',: , ........ '
.'
,
~I
•
,- I
.-, , I I
... --' ;.
.. , •
\
... ... ~.",
,~
... , ,.'
• I
,, N, ,
,- I ....
.
~""', \
'.
,\
'.I
I \ ,
( \<~-'--'
• I
I
...
\
I
",'"
j.:ap 1
iii
ABSTRACT
iv
Methods of research included formal and informal
interviews, the use of informants, collection of genealogi-
cal data and the utilization of Arabic, English, Persian
and Pashto sources relevant to the study. The research
works from a framework of traditional ethnography which
presents details of the kinship, descent, marriage and
nomenclature systems of the people of Almara, as well as
their technology, economic, and market systems and their
systems of ideology and values. The study is based upon a
framework of structural-functional analysis and the method
of case studies.
The dissertation is divided into eight chapters ex-
cluding introduction. The introduction spells out the
problems, objectives, methodology and theoretical formula-
tion of the dissertation. It also reviews relevant litera-
ture, and then discusses certain assumptions behind the
research and how these assumptions guided the entire study.
Chapter One deals with geography, climate, flora, fauna,
location and history of the community, Chapter Two presents
an overview of the subsistence technology, and local economy
of the people including systems of agriculture, animal
hu~~andry, forest and land ownership, lumber trading and
intra- and inter-national market networks. Chapter Three
concentrates on kinship and kinship terminology, family
systems, patterns of households, allotments of inheritance
and the organization of lineage. Chapter FOllr discusses
the rules and meaning of marriage, its stages, process and
v
types. Chapter Five focuses on political organization and
political blocs. In addition, the question of fending and
warfare are discussed in terms of trouble cases. The
politics of patrimonialism and the dawra (cycle) system as
they operate at the national and village level are explained.
Chapter Six concentrates on the meaning, structure and
principles of Islam, Shari~ (Islamic law), figh (Islamic
jurisprudence), major Islamic schools of thoughts and
criminal laws are discussed. Chapter Seven presents the
central theme of this dissertation. It deals with the
resolution of conflict within and between political commun-
ities. In this chapter the question of settlement of
trouble-cases through mediation, arbitration, "inter-
mediaries," and ordeal and oaths are discussed in detail~
vi
Lhe applicability and enforcement of the laws at national
level creates problems for the government and jUdiciary
powers. However, it may be more beneficial if the laws are
made in the light of the "customary laws" of the major
ethnic groups in a plural society.
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
viii
I would also like to extend my gratitude and
appreciation to my host family in Almara who accepted me as
a member of their family and provided me with whatever
they could afford. I must thank my informants who taught·
me about their way of life. I also extend my sincere
appreciation to the governor of the Paktya Provinc~ and
general director for the Paktya Developmental Project who
provided me with a comfortable room in a modern buil~lng;
ix
With respect to my theoretical and methodological
background, I benefited immensely from my graduate work in
the Department of Anthropology, State University of New
York at Buffalo. I extend my special gratitude to
Professors Dr. Keith F. Otterbein and Professor Dr. Charles
Frantz for developing and sharpening my interests ~n the
subfield of political anthropology and law, through their
publications, illuminating lectures and their large lists
of bibliographies. Also, I express my special thanks to
Dr. Ann McElroy for her helpful, illuminative and con-
structive comments on my dissertation and also for her
extensive bibliography of the Middle East. Dr. Graham Kerr
and Dr. Russell Stone of the Department of Sociology were
both immensely helpful to me. Both of these Professors
provided me with extensive bibliographic references in
the domain of Sociology and lent me their personal books
for the whole year. Therefore, I express my cordial
respect and gratitude to both of them.
I am particularly in debted to my major advisor and
Chairman of the Supervisory Committee, Dr. Phillips Stevens,
Jr., who in addition to my doctoral dissertation super-
vised my M.A. and Ph.D. programs since my enrollment
in the Department of Anthropology, SUNY at Buffalo. He
read the earlier version of this dissertation in my hand-
writing which was indeed a tedious job and I admire his
tolerance. In whatever measure this dissertation succeeds,
x
without Professor Stevens' constructive and frank
criticisms, valuable suggestions and encouragement, the
study could not have had the form it does now. Therefore,
my gratitude, appreciation and deep respect of him is of
a kind which can ,hardly be expressed adequately in the
form of a simple acknowledgement.
Several persons read the dissertation and made
constructive criticisms and helpful suggestions and to each
of them I extend my gratitude. None of the above but
myself are responsible for any shortcomings displayed in
this dissertation.
Alef-Shah Zadran
July 15, 1977
xi
LIST OF TABLES
xii
LIST OF DIAGRAMS
Diagram No. Page No.
1 Network Market . . .51
2 Zadrans' Genealogy . • .
3 Zadrans' Genealogy .. . 69
4 Zmel-Khel's Genealogy. 70
6 Affinal Terminology . . .. . 81
7 Affinal Terminology . . .. 81
xiii
LIST OF MAPS
2 Ethnic Groups. . • . . . • . . . . • 21
xiv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Abstract . . • . . . . . • . . . . • . • . . iv
Acknowledgement. .. ... . viii
List of Tables . xii
xv
Page No.
Chapter Five: POLITICAL ORGANIZATION
AND POLITICAL BLOCS:
Segmentary Opposition,
Feuding (Dushmani), Warfare
(Luya Jagra), Factionalism
and Blocs, Patrimonialism
and Dawrah (Cycle) • . . • . • 112
xvi
INTRODUCTION
Objectives:
This dissertation is based upon anthropological
fieldwork carried out in the Pashtun village of Almara in
the southern foothills of the Suleiman range in south-
eastern Afghanistan. The village, with a population of
2010 is situated about twenty-five kilometers west of the
Durand Line, the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The villagers are all Muslims of the Sunni sect and all
members of the community speak one language, Pashto.
This study is a "focused ethnography," with the
resolution of conflict as its central theme. The settle-
ment of di.sputes through indigenous systems will be
di&cussed. Extensive legal traditions such as Islamic
sharia and fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and Western laws
which are being currently enforced in the country in
general and within the village in particular, will be
explored and explained. The effects of these external
legal traditions on the native customary laws will be
examined. In essence, this study will provide the reader
in general with an ethnography of one rural area of
Afghanistan and of a people who have never received
anthropological investigation. It is my intention that
1
some generalizations made on the basis of the data from
Almara may concern other rural ~nd peasant communities in
the country.
The study works from a framework of traditional
ethnography which presents details of geography, history,
kinship, descent, marriage and kinship nomenclatur~ of the
people of Almara as well as their technology, economic, and
market systems and their systems of ideology and belief.
Chapter One deals with geography, climate, flora, fauna,
location and history of the community. Chapter Two
discusses the subsistence technology and local economy of
the people including systems of agriculture, animal
husbandry, forest and land ownership, lumber trading and
inter-and intra-national market network. Chapter Three
concentrates on kinship and kinship terminology, family
systems, patterns of households, allotment of inheritance
and the organization of lineage. In Ghapter Four the
rules and meaning of marriage, its stages, process and
types are discussed. Chapter Five focuses on political
organization, and political blocs. In addition, the
question of feuding and warfare are discussed in terms of
trouble cases. The politics of patrimonial ism and the
dawra (cycle) system as they operate at the national and
village level are explained. Chapter Six concentrates on
the meaning, structure and principles of Islam. Sharia
(Islamic law), figh (Islamic jurisprudence) major Islamic
2
schools and criminal laws are discussed. Chapter VII & VIII
constitutes the central point of this dissertation. It
deals with the resolution of conflict within and between
political communities. In this section the question of
settlement of trouble cases through mediation, arbitration,
negotiation, "intermediaries" and ordeal and oaths --are
discussed in detail. All trouble cases are categorized
and for each category its related tsale (code) is
identified and descriptions of trouble case~ are presented.
The rationale for doing a focused ethnography in my
own country is three-fold: (1) Anthropological studies of
the people are lacking. I have to note that even many
native Afghans from the capital city of Kabul and other
provinces in the country have little knowledge of their
own country, and people and their way of life. Due to this
lack of information there are many misconceptions about
them. (2) In the domain of anthropology as well as other
disciplines there seems to be developing a tendency toward
studies of the natives Qy the natives. Upon the end of
their studies scholars and scientists coming from the
third word trained in Eastern or Western highly industri-
alized nations should return to their countries. I
believe that the training of these scholars and scientists
will be most useful if it is incorporated with native
field work experience for the solution of problems in the
social scientists' country. (J) Another current trend in
J
the social sciences holds that social scientists should
study the social problems confronting the people under
investigation. In my opinion the introduction of alien
legal systems and laws and the conflict between them and
traditional legal systems not only fail to resolve
. disp~tes but result in many intense conflicts and hpstility.
I, therefore, feel that this state of affairs jeopardizes
~he relationships between tribes or ethnic groups and
endangers the unity and social order of the country,
Thus, in the last section of this dissertation I offer a
set of suggestions which may be useful for this conflictual
situation.
4
is presumed to have, as its concrete expression, the norms
for social relations and the rules governing the consti-
tution of social groups and their interrelations (Levi-
Strauss in Schneider 1969:26).
Functionalism in anthrop.ology draws on the organic
analogy. The functionalists think of sociocultural., systems
as though they were a kind of "organism" whose parts are
not only related to each other but, at the same time,
contribute to the maintenance, stability, and the very
survival of the "organism." Basic to all functional
explanations, then, is the assumption that all cultural
systems have certain functional requisites or needs
(whether they are social needs in Radcliffe-Brovm's opinion
or biological needs in Malinowski terms) --all of which
must somehow be met if the system is to continue as an
ongoing concern (Kaplan and Manners 1972:56).
I did not ignore the alliance theorists point of
view with regard to social structure. I realized the
importance of their theoretical framework particularly
with reference to the exchange of women among the Pashtuns
especially in instances of resolution of conflicts of
trouble cases. But I am mostly inclined in my theoretical
and methodological point of view toward Radcliffe-Brown
and his followers in this study. I believe that social
structure of Almarawals involves the network of their
actual social relations. There are rules which regulate
the relations between the members of the groups within and
5
between the villages. The community rules and network of
social relations have their own functions which facilitate
the maintenance of the groups and society,
The field work was carried out from September 1975
till September 1976. Being a native bilingual (speaker of
both Pashto and Parian or Dari) facilitated my research in
the village and elsewhere. I took down all of my field
notes in Pashto, the language spoken in the village.
Before going to the village of Almara, I had originally
selected the village of Spai-khel, where I have kinship
ties, as my research community. Because of methodological
reasons relating to research bias, I chose Almara where I
have no kinship ties as the site for carrying out ethno-
graphic field work. The village is one hundred kilometers
away from my home town, Gardez. In the village I lived
with the villagers and ate and slept in one of the men's
house (guest house). In the nearby town of Khost I was
given a room in an apartment (Government's Guest House) by
the governor of the Province where sometimes on Fridays, I
could get a shower and wash my clothes.
The information relevant to this study was collected
through participant observation, interviewing local
informants and lawyers, jurists and professors at Kabul
University. I attended sessions of conflict resolution
through mediation, arbitration and "intermediaries" based
upon the customary laws. I recorded how the marakachian
(members of the council of elders) reached decisions on
6
specific disputes. Scheduled interviews were used to
elicit statements about the structure and functioning of
the indigenous and Islamic' legal systems. At all stages,
informants were asked to illustrate any cited rules or
points of l~w by referring to specific cases heard within
their localities .during the last few decades. A consider-
able "amount of time was spent collecting different types
of trouble cases and I have relied heavily on oral
testimonies and my own observations. Moreover, the cases
were not gathered on any random sampling planj but I had
experienced prolonged immersion in the community as well as
in other parts of Paktya Province. Hence, I saw how
litigations were immersed in daily social life. I also
collected some of the relevant data from governmental
offices. Many documents and books written in Persian.
Pashto and Arabic were utilized for the completion of this
essay.
One of the problems I encountered in the field
involved the collection of recent trouble cases to help
illustrate legal rules elicited from local informants.
The reasons are two-fold: (1) the villagers usually
resolve their conflicts within or between the villages
through local mediators, arbitrators and/or "intermediaries."
Because of fear of the government they hesitate to report
those types of cases to individuals who come from a
different community. (2) The people involved in recent
trouble cases may still be alive and many of the trouble
7
cases such as a homicide, woman abduction or theft could be
very sensitive. Therefore, the informants usually avoid
talking about them. I ove"rcame this problem by maintaining
informants' 'anonymity. In this study I have only been able
to analyze 29 of the 41 cases. The other cases are still
sensitive situations regarding the parties involved.
Other types of problems that I encountered in the
village were related to my room and board and my personal
safety. The location of the village near the border of
Afghanistan and Pakistan, poor relations of the two nations
during my fieldwork, and the location of the village being
close to black market trade routes, (carrying of lumber
and other commodities to Pakistan) forced me to stay inside
a hamlet with one of the families. In one way I was lucky
because I was staying with my host family as one of their
household members, hence, I observed many things which I
could not otherwise see. An attempt to pay for one's stay
is considered a great insult to one's host. For example,
one day I bought a piece of meat (about twelve pounds) and
some fresh fruits from the nearby tovm and I brought them
with me to the village. When one of my hosts saw them,
he carried them home, but he was very upset and told me that
this should not be repeated.
In addition, I had my camera and tape recorder with
me. I could not use the tape recorder at all. I took a
few pictures of the village and of the villagers. In
essence, the villagers did not want their voice to be
recorded and their pictures to be taken for certain
reasons. Perhaps they were afraid that their pictures and
the tapes' will be given to the government for certain
purposes. I sh~uld note that thanks to Allah they were
not sensitive toward my notebook and pen.
Being a member of the society, though in man~ ways
beneficial to doing research, sometimes serves as an
obstacle against the researcher and makes one biased. A
native researcher misses many incidents and takes for
granted many things. I overcame this barrier by trying to
review Keith K. Otterbein's (1972) data sheet, to read
Phillips Steven, Jr. 's "A Check-list for Self-Evaluation
in Field Work," to read Notes and Queries in Anthropology
(1951) recommended to me by Ann McElroy when I was leaving
for Afghanistan in 1975. Another disadvantage of beir.g a
native field worker are the attitudes and expectations of
the people toward him. Some of the people in the
community thought I knew everything about their culture.
When I wanted the details of something they thought that
the question was silly. Although it was not easy to put
up with the situation, I managed.
To mention one further point seems worthwhile. In
this dissertation I have intentionally added some basics
of anthropology. This decision is based upon the assumption
that the essay might be read by some nonprofessional in
Afghanistan.
9
CHAPTER I
GeographY:
The Pashto-speaking peasant-tribal 1 people of
Almara village live in the southeastern region of Paktya
province in southeastern Afghanistan. The villagers
settled the low-lying terraces of rivers and creeks. The
valley is delimited by natural boundaries. The Shamel
River rises among high mountains in the Suleiman chains,
runs just through the southern edge of the village and
flows eastward, after passing the Khost Loy Woluswali,2
crosses the Durand Line of 189J and enters Wazirestan in
west Pakistan. Almara is surrounded by the Dawa Weeshti
Ghar in the north, Keprie and Pekie Kalie (villages) in
the east, Tara Gher J (Black Mountain) and Kikhie Kaiy
(village) in the south, and Dwamenda and Melwie (village)
in the West.
The Mountain system of Hindu KUSh 4 extends in a
west-east direction across the country, dividing it into
northern and southern Afghanistan. It is more natural to
speak of a tripartite division: the plains of northern
Afghanistan, the mountains of the Hindu Kush and the high
plateaus of southern Afghanistan. It is the high plateaus
10
of southern Afghanistan, the southern foothills of the
Suleiman chains, in which the Almara villagers are situated.
P) ,
Climate:
Climate is very much a function of altitude and
seasons. In fact the whole Paktya province has two kinds
of climates: the orographic 5 (the development and relations
of highlands and mountains) and the lower altitude types.
The temperature in higher elevations goes down below zero
degrees centigrade and snow falls during late fall, winter
and early spring. In the lower altitude areas the people
sometimes get rain instead of snow in the winter time. The
village under study although located in what is considered
to be a low-level zone in the Province, gets some snow
in the winter but it does not last for long. The Indian
Ocean Monsoon affects the climate of the village and the
11
villagers get some rain in the summer time. Annual rainfall
is about 269.8 mm subject to local and annual variation
and there are mainly three wet seasons, as fall rain,
winter snow and as spring rain.
In essence the village has four distinct seasons:
Spring, Sur.~mer, Fall and Winter. The duration of them
are about the same and each season lasts about three months.
Principal orographic vegetation of the Suleiman
chain and its foothills include oak, pine. cedar, olive,
fir, larch, yew and others (Dupree 197J:p.20). Within the
village in areas of common property and in front of the
homesteads of households are planted willow, poplar and
many different kinds of fruit trees such as pomegranates,
peach, cherry, pear, apples, grapes and others.
Foothills surrounding the area covered with such
trees provide fertile soil as well as bushes and grass
allowing the herders, nomads and semi-nomadic people such
as the Almara villagers to graze their herds in the
mountain pastures whenever the climate and seasons are
suitable for this purpose. The source of water supply is
the Shamel River and its tributary, the Tangie River.
The Shamel rises from the Tsatta Kandau Ghar (mountain)
and flows southeast toward Almara. The Tangie River
originates from the Tangie Ghar after passing the Tangie
valley joins the Shamel at Dawamenda located about eight
kilometers west of the village. The river maintains the
name Shamel.
12
The following tIDIes indicate the average rainfall
and temperature reports prepared by the forecast station
in Dawamanda about 8 kilometers away from the village.
Tempe~ature in 1969 in 12 Months in Centigrade
Months Minimum Maximum
13
In the areas of higher elevation some snow
accumulates through the winter. The snow starts melting
in the Spring and ~ndures through the Summer time
providing the irrigational and drinking water supply for
the villagers and their animals. The village under study
is situated nineteen kms. away toward the west of the
Khost town and about one-hundred kms. eastward of Gardez
city, the capital of Paktya Province. The unpaved Gardez-
Khost road crosses the northern edge of the village.
The location of the village toward the northern
bank of the Shamel river which floods very often provides
fertile aluvial soil for the Almara peoples' terraced
farms. The land near the bank of the river is very often
endangered when the River floods. Many times the terraces
have been washed away but because of the scarcity of the
land the villagers spend years to rebuild and fix their
eroded land, make dikes and bring the plots agai~ under
CUltivation. Because of the nature of the fertile aluvial
soil of the area the Almarawal generally harvest two
crops per year depending on the type of crop, climate and
degree of rainfall.
History:
The Almara villagers are all Pashtuns who speak
Pashto and with the exception of the Turis in west Pakistan
all Pashtuns are Muslims of the orthodox Suni sect. The
word "Pathan," which is applied to the Afghan 6 in India
14
and Pakistan, is the corrupted form of "Pashtun" or
"Pakh tun. ,,7
Yaghistan, as the Amir Abdur Raman referred to his
country, partic~larly the tribal belt between British India
and Afghanistan, has been variously translated: "the Land
of the Unruly," ~'Land of the Free," "Land of Rebel~_"
Pashtuns' Origin:
The ethnic origin of the Pashtuns (Pakhtun or Afghan)
has not been satisfactorily established. In the past,
most Afghan authors traditionally ascribed a Jewish origin
to their people. According to this tradition, the Pashtuns
were the descendents of the Beni-Israel, who were deported
by Buktanasar (Nebuchadnezzar) to Hazrajat, believed to be
the Arzareth of the Bible. The western writers who
accepted the theory of the Jewish origin of the Pashtuns
have tried to substantiate it by invoking several factors
such as the Afghans legends and geneologies, common
Afghan and - Hebraic nomenclature such as Suleiman, Yusuf
15
and Daoud for Solomon, Joseph and David; physical
resemblances between Afghans and Jews; certain tribal
customs and occurrence of the name Kabul in the Old
Testament. 9
Modern scholars trace the Pashtuns to the Irano -
Afghan and Bakhler - Afghans branch of the Indo-Eurppean
or Aryan peoples. Habibi (1975:24-29) tells us that even
before 4000 B.C., a group of tribal people called the
Aryans were living in a place named Aryana-Vega, simply
meaning the homeland of the Aryans, "noble men." There
are four principle opinions as to the location of Aryana-
Vega:
(1) Baltic Ocean coast
(2) Northern coast of the Black Sea
(J) Northern coast of the Caspian Sea
(4) The Pamir area where the Amu Darya (classical
Oxus) originates.
The impetus for the initial migration has been
attributed to either (a) population increase and consequent
food scarcity; or (b) a climatic change resulting in a
general cooling trend: or combination of these factors.
The migration apparently began around 4000 B.C. and
the people headed toward Bakhdai (U~) or Bakhtria, the
present capital of Balkh Province in northern Afghanistan.
There they developed the Aryan civilization and built up
the very large and famous walled city of Bakhdi, Ommul-Belad
16
meaning the "mother of cities." The arrival of' these
central Aryan people to Ommul-Belad is estimated at 2500
B.C.
Habibi (1975) and many other historians believe that
the Central Aryans conducted another migration around 1400
B.C. and separated into three major groups each following
a sep~rate migratory route.
The first group, Central and Bakhterian Aryans
occupied the northern and southern foothills of the Hidu
Kush. Their homeland is said to be the area between the
Indus, Ouxus and the Khurasans deserts and included
Bakhtria (present day Bulkh), Takharistan, Harat,
Arakusia, Kabul, Kandahar, Sistan and Khorasan. The
southern boundary was delimited by the Arabian Sea.
The second group of immigrants, the Iranian Aryans,
went toward the southwest and occupied the Fars Land,
constituting"present day Iran. Historians hold that this
migration lasted from 1400 B.C. until 800 B.C. The first
state created by them in Iran was called the Medic state.
The third group of Aryans in Bakteria, Indian
Aryans, passed the Hindu Kush range and via the Kabul and
Khaiber passes penetrated the Indus valley to the Ganga
River.
Grostawlabon (in Habibi 1975:24) tells us that before
dispersion and emigration from Aryana-Vega, the Aryans
spoke a specific language called Aric. Sanskrit originated
from this now extinct Aric language.
17
As was mentioned earlier one group of the Aryan
stock, the Sanskrit-speaking Indo Aryans, left Bakhtria
and moved toward India. The second group spoke Old
Persian, the predecessor via Pahlawi to present day
Persian. A third group. of people who remained in Bakhdi
(Balkh), are called Bakht = Pakhal = Pashtun and they must
have had their own distinct language. Since these people
still have kept their historical name and speak Pashto,
their language must have been Pashto (Habibi 1975:24).
The Rig-Veda, another Indo-Aryan religious book,
composed around 1400 B.C., mentions the Pakhat name. By
inference we may associate this central Bakhterian group
with the Pashto language. This view is supported by the
facts that there is no evidence for either a mother
language to Pashto or for a pr~o-Pashto language.
There is historical evidence which indicates that
after 1400 B.C. Bakherian Aryans or the Pakhat tribes
went toward the eastern mountains of Afghanistan and
settled along the Indus River. The Rig-Veda tells about
a battle among ten tribes, one of which is the Pashtuns.
Both the Awesta, another religious book written in Zand,10
and the writings of Herodotus, mention the Pakhat or
Paktwees name and indicates their being on the Indus River
Bank around 520 B.C.
Reviewing all this historical evidence enables us
to conclude that Pashtana (Pashto plural form of Pashtun)
Aryans at the very beginning were living in Bakhteria
18
(Bahhdi) and after their habitat name they were called
Pakht (~. ) or Pakhat ( J ' ) .
~ ~
These people moved out
from their original place from 1400 B.C. to 1000 B.C. and
dispersed over Afghanistan's eastern mountains and reached
the coast of the Indus River. Throughout they kept their
nationality and nation's name Pakht or Pakhet = Pashtun
and their language, Pashto till today (Habibi 1975:22-27).
According to Gregorian (1969:29-30) the earliest
mention of Afghans (Pashtuns) in Muslim sources is to be
found in the work of the Arab chronicler Ibn'l Athir (976)
and in the anonymous Persian geography of Hudud al- Alan
(982). In the Persian work the Afghans are described as
a small population inhabiting the region of the Suleiman
Range. Much later, al-Biruni identified various Afghan
(Pashtun) tribes located along the frontier of western
India (western present Pakistan). Ibn Battuta, who passed
through Kabul in 1333, claimed that he met a tribe called
Afghans who lived in the Suleiman Range, and possessed
considerable strength. Gregorian believes that for the
most part, the expansion of the Afghans (Pashtuns) from
the area of the Suleiman Range between the eleventh and
eighteenth centuries and the nature of early Afghan society
remains unstudied.
19
important. The term "ethnic group" is generally understood
in anthropological literature (Naroll 1964:285) to designate
a population which:
1. is largely biologically self-perpetuating
2. share fundamental cultural values, realized in
cultural forms
J. makes up a field of communication and interaction
4. has a membership which identified itself, and is
identified by other categories of the same order.
The major tribes constituting the Pashtun ethnic group are
the Abdalis or Duranis, the Ghilzis and others. Duranis
are subdivided into seven subtribes: the Popaalzai,10
Barakzai, Alizai, Nurzai, Ishaqzai, Achakzai, and Alikozai,
The Sadozai (an offshot of the Popaalzai subtribe, and the
Muhammedzai clan (an offshot of the Barakzai) are the two
Afghan royal clans; with some brief interruptions, they
have alternated (except for the last five years) on the
throne of Afghanistan for the last two centuries.
The Ghilzais are the second largest Pashtun tribe in
Afghanistan. Suleiman-Khel,11 Hotak, Tokhi, Andar,
Ali-khel, Nassiri and Taraki are the subtribes, or better
called lineages of the Ghilzai tribe.
The other important Pashtun tribes are the Waziziris,
the Khattaks, the Afridis, the Mohmands, the Yusufzais,
the Shinwaris, the Khugianis, the Safis, the Ahmadzais,
the Mangels, the Zazis and the Zadrans.
20
..
c
ell
~
l'C
21
The non-Pashtun ethnic groups are the Tajiks, the
Hazaras, the Turkmans, the Uzbeks, the Qazaqs, the
Naristanis, the Aimaqs and others.
The Pashtuns constitute a large, highly self-aware
ethnic group inhabiting adj"oining areas of Afghanistan
(east, southeast, southern and other parts of Afgh~nistan)
22
outside the range of effective punitive
action. As early as 1877, the British
began their consolidation of a forward
wall or protective outposts by outright
bludgeoning of local Pashtun rulers.
In 1877 they simply informed Amir Sher Ali
that he had no claims on Dir, Swat,
Chitral and Bajaur.
In 1879. the British forced the Amir Yoqub,
son of Sher Ali, to sign the Treaty of ,
Gandamak under which the British will
retain in its own hands control of the
Khaiber Pass and Michni and of all relations
with the independent tribes, territory
directly connected with passes . . Therefore,
the treaty ceded large tracts of land in
the districts of Loralai, Zhob, Pishin,
Quetta, and Nushki, presumably giving legal
justification for as much as the British
could occupy and hold.
Dupree goes on and tells us that because of the
annual incursions by the tribes, the British attempted to
push the Forward Policy once more under Lord Landsdowne and
appreciably increased the size of the British Indian Army.
constructed strategic cantonments at Rawalpindi, Attock and
Quetta and built a railroad to Chaman.
Amir Audur Rahman Khan, son of Mohammad Afzel, Sher
Ali's grandson resented British encroachments in the
Pashtun tribal area. He viewed both Russians and British
people with apprehension and repeatedly in his auto-
biography (1900) states that he never considered any
Pashtun areas as permanently ceded to the 3ritish. In
1892, he attempted to establish direct contact with London.
Because of pressures from London the Amir agreed to
receive a mission under Sir Mortimer Durand in 1893. The
Durand mission went to Kabul in September 1893 in order to
23
delineate once and for all British and Afghan responsi-
bilities in the Pashtun area. During the negotiations
both sides agreed on a boundary from Chitral and Baroghil
Pass up to Peshawer, and thence up to Koh-i-Malik Siyah.
Based upon this agreement Wakhan, Nuristan, came under the
Amir's rule and he renounced his claims for tr·' r[' iJ.way
station of New Chamah, Chagai, the rest of Waziri, Biland
Khel, Kurm, Afridi, Bajaur, Swat, Buner, Dir, Chilas and
Chitral. In this manner the Pashtuns of Afghanistan and
Pashtunistan, although the Amir never seemed to accept
the proposed divisions, were separated by force into two
political entities.
"The Durand line," writes Sir Fraser-Tytler in his
book Afghanistan,
Though perhaps in the circumstances the
best line possible, has few advantages
and many defeats. It is illogical from
the point of view of ethnography, of
strategy and of geography. It cuts
across one of the main basins of Indus
watershed; it splits a nation into two,
and even it divides tribes (in Amin and
Schiz 1976:19).
The line which cuts off about eight millions, the Pashtuns
and Baluchs, from their national government, has been the
primary cause of conflict and frontier troubles between
Afghanistan and Pakistan until present.
Almarwals Origin
---
The origin of the Almara 12 villagers is obscure.
The inhabitants happened to be composed of five different
24
lineages of the Zadran tribe. Their homeland used to be
the valleys of the Suleiman Range of southeastern
Afghanistan. My informants uniformly gave me the following
information about their origins and it seems consistent
with Habibi's (1975), Barth's (1969) and others' state-
ments: "Our first ancestor came to Afghanistan frq~m
25
among all people in Afghanistan, and they have traditionally
served as mediators. People in Almara 13 believe that
after the resettlement of the fifth lineage in the village,
the social atmosphere of the area became friendly, or at
least the number of events considered conflicts was
reduced.
In this chapter we discussed the geography, location,
climate, fauna and flora, history, Pashtuns' origin,
contemporary Pashtuns' ethnic groups, unjust separation
of the Pashtuns and the Almarawal's origin. The following
chapter deals with subsistance technology and local
economy of the Almara villagers.
26
FOOTNOTES FOR CHAPTER I
27
7There is an interesting legend in this connection.
It is related that the Afghan Malik Qais, at the
invitation of Khalid-bin-Walid, historically famous Arab
officer, went to Medina to me~t Prophet Mohammed. The
Prophet gave him the Arabic name Abdur Rashid, on account
of his bravery in the battles against the Qureshs of
Mecca, remarking that the attachment of the Afghans to
Islam would be in strength like that of the "pathan," the
wood upon which the keel is laid while constructing a ship.
On this account Abdur Rashid was given the title of
Pathan.
28
their kizhdy and spent the night over there. The couple
slaughtered a sheep for them, served them good food and
kept them very happy and comfortable. Based upon the
Pashtuns norms, when a relative visits his close agnatic
female relative in her house, the male takes something such
as sweets and clothing, called khwaga, kali and teekry in
Pashto - with him to offer her as a gift. Since these
people also joined their female relative and with a very
warm welcome, in the morning when they were leaving the
tent they offered the woman a gift but it was neither sweet
nor clothing. Since the couple had neither residence nor
a piece of land, the woman's relatives asked what did she
want for teekry? The woman refused to accept any kind of
gift, but her relatives insistingly asked her to consult
her husband and make a decision with him what is their
crucial need and what did they want. The husbann told his
wife to ask her relatives to give her a piece of land where
they could erect their tent. The wife did so. The couple
had an old and thin horse. The woman's relatives simply
asked the husband and the wife to ride on the horse
together and lead it on the land of the Asmael-khel toward
the town of Khost until the horse stops. The couple rode
the horse and started their journey from Dwamenda on
Asmael-khel land face towards the town of Khost. When
they arrived to the Kapry Kaly (village) the horse stopped
and fell down. Thus the area between Dwamenda and Kapry
Kaly was given to the woman and hence after her name it was
called Almara.
29
CHAPTER II
JO
villagers. An occasional villager carries a shotgun on
his shoulder searching for ducks, wild pigeons, sparrows
and partridge. Several people own Afghan hound dogs to
hunt rabbits for their meat and foxes for their fur.
During the Spring time teenage girls in groups of five to
ten, gather fresh young plants (bashkay) which gro~ in the
farms as wild herbs. The villagers also very often
consume fresh clover in early Spring and late fall or
whenever the vegetation is young and fresh. However,
because of their small contribution to the villagers'
everyday dietary system, hunting and gathering can be
excluded from the villagers' sUbsistence technology.
Hunting with nets, traps, shotguns or dogs seem to be
conducted more for sport and leisure, rather than for
sUbsistence.
Lack of the digging stick and hoe, and also the
absence of swidden farming, precludes these people from
being classified as horticulturalists.
Animal Husbandry:
The peasants breed and raise domesticated animals.
The most common are cattle, goats, sheep, camels, donkeys
and dogs; fairly common also are chickens. Of these
animals, cows and goats are most significant, and are
greater in number. There are a few households in the whole
Zadran area that still practice their fathers' and
ancestors' sheep breeding occupation. Goat raising is
31
still very common in -the area and in neighboring
communities such as the Mangels, but goat herds (there)
are small.
I was told several times by the villagers that their
ancestors from their original places, Mergha or Woch
Largia or Birmel, located in Waziristan, west Paki~tan,
32
The goats of the Almarawal (the people of Almara)
are sma'~ and thin. A goat weighs from 30 to 40 kilograms
depending on the sex of the animal and the season, which
determines the availability of grass, herbs, ghania (oak
small branches and leaves) and other types of fodder.
During the spring goats graze in the areas neighboring
,
village on the hillsides or in the farms and very often
eat wild grasses and herbs available. They are not fed
by their owners.
Summer is a harsh time for the animal fodder. Some
of the householders in the village, because of the high
temperature, lack of fodder for their livestock, and
because men must engage in falling trees for the lumber
trade, leave their hamlets and spend the summer in the
mountains in bandas (huts made of stones, mud and
branches).
Fall is a pleasant season for the people and their
animals. It is called was, harvest time. Young boy
shepherds between 15 and 25 bring their animals immediately
behind the harvesters to graze on the stubble, as in the
rest of the country and elsewhere in the Middle East all
harvested land becomes public grazing areas where any
shepherd may graze his goat-herds, sheep-flocks and other
animals.
Winter also is harsh, and a time of scarcity of
fodder, particularly for the goats. Only oak twigs and
leaves (ghania), corn stems and collected fruit tree leaves
33
are available for goats. The wheat and rice hay and dried
clover and alfalfa are given to cows, oxen, donkeys and
camels. Most of such forms of fodder are brought to the
village from other parts of the country such as Gardez,
Kandahar and elsewhere.
Cows are the sec~nd most important animal, for
,
dairy products and meat. An average cow weighs from 72 to
94 kgs. Each cow is milked five times in twenty-four
hours during the first two to three months after giving
birth to a calf. Later on the number of milking times is
reduced until the cow is in its seventh or eighth month
of pregnancy. During the first days of milking each cow
gives about one Kg. of milk five times in twenty-four
hours. Most households in the village own one to three
cows and three to seven goats. Women, in addition to
conducting the family affairs as housewives, are also
responsible for milking and feeding the goats during the
winter. Other animals such as cows and oxen while kept at
home at all times are also taken care of by women. When
the householders and their animals are in the village,
their cows stay in barns (sturga) inside the hamlet (kala),
particularly during the winter. In summer both types of
animals while they are in the village stay in shelters
called seyuria (shadow) made of twigs and leaves.
Moreover, each family owns an ox or two for plowing
and two or three donkeys for milling, transportation of
animal fertilizer and manure to the farms, and transportation
34
of firewood from the mountains. Some families ovm one or
two camels, depending on the number.of adult males in the
household. Camels are used for heavy transportation,
commerce and lumber trading within Afghanistan and Pakistan.
For each herd of goats and sheep, averaging from
eighty to two-hundred animals, the people think it .,is
sufficient to ke0p from three to four stud males. Breeding
is controlled for ~oats and sheep as well as cows, to the
extend that impregnation is prevented in the summer time
to avoid lambing and calfing during the winter, when the
risk of loss is greatest. For goats and sheep, breeding
is prevented by a piece of cloth tied under the belly of
the woz (goat stud) and mug (sheep stud), covering
the genitals. In the case of cows, the skhwender~ (bulls)
are kept away to avoid impregnating the females. Very
few families keep bulls and these families are reluctant
to have their animals mate with the cows because they
believe that by doing so, when thl-; animal becomes an ox
it will not be a strong one.
The best time for lambing and calfing is the first
month of the spring season (April). At this time snowfall
stops; the temperature does not fall below zero Centigrade,
the herbs and grasses revive, and the risk of loss for
animals is lessened.
Shearing of sheep and goats is generally done in
the middle of spring and fall if the herders are leaving
for Pakistan to spend the winter there. If the herders do
35
not move the herds to Pakistan in the winter time, the
animals are not sheared in autumn so that they are
protected in the slightly colder winter of Almara.
The shearing is done by both men and women. The
wool is transported to Kabul, the capital city of the
country to be exported officially, or the ovmers themselves
export it on camelback to Pakistan where they can sell it
for a higher price. A part of the wool is utilized in
the household to make leamtsia and tagher, special types
of carpets or rugs.
Milking of goats, sheep and cows is women's
responsibility. Even if the herd is large and the herders
must move to mountains when the climate permits, or when
they go to Pakistan, a part of the family including some
adult females also move with the herd and do the milking
and butter churning.
The most expensive dairy product is butter. After
milking, the product is boiled up and poured into separate
pots of about two to four gallons each. When the milk
relatively cools off, the housewife adds some yogurt, as
yeast. After 10 to 15 hours the milk becomes yogurt, and
is ready to be served or churned.
In the area under study and some other regions in
Afghanistan the people often use a goat skin (Zhay) to
churn butter. Still in some other parts of the country
the people use a ceramic jug (zagai).
The zhay and/or zagai, filled with yogurt and water,
is set on a cushion and the squatting women move the
containers back and forth for two to three hours.
Occasionally more water is added. When the butter is
separated from the remaining part of the yogurt, which is
called terway, (or shrombay in Pashto) the butter is
, kept
in a separate pot and shrobay is served by members of the
family.
With about 20 to 30 kgs. of butter (eoch) the house-
wife melts the butter and makes ghee (ghwari), or
clarified butter from it. Ghee is expensive and if there
is more ~han what the family needs, it is sold in cities
like Khost, Gardez and Kabul, bringing in substantial
extra cash. Ghee is served to the household woman when
she gives birth to a child. At this time women believe
other types of oil are harmful.
In reality, although the people may not be conscious
of the fact, intake of ghee during labor, when the woman
needs more calories and comfort, provides her at least
with the minimal amount of calories required.
The skin of cows, oxen, sheep, goats and camels are
also a good source of income for the villagers. Skins are
collected by traders or by the villagers themselves and
are taken to Kabul or are transported to Pakistan and sold
there for higher prices. The following chart indicates
prices for the skins of different animals in Afghanistan:
37
Animal Price 12er skin in Afs.
(55 Afs.· = $1 )
Camel 500-700
Ox 400-600
Cow 300-500
Sheep 70-90
-.
Goat 60-80 Table 3
Each family has from 10 to 25 chickens, raised for
their eggs and meat. A hen lays from 220 to 270 eggs per
year. Hens lay few eggs during the winter, due to
temperature and scarcity of food. One of the main reasons
for raising chickens in the village is to keep ready the
ingredients of a meal for visitors. Particularly in the
rural areas, visitors do not notify their hosts in advance,
as they generally are sure those persons will be at home.
So when a guest comes, a hen or a rooster will be
slaughtered and some rice and beans will be cooked and
dundakia (rice with ghee or soup) will be served.
The following table shows a comparison of prices of
animals in forty years:
Table 4 1935 1975
1. goat 10-15 Afs. 1200-2000 Afs.
2. sheep 20-25 )000-5COO
3. cow 40-50 2000-8000
4. ox 60-100 3000-10000
5. donkey 5-6 1500-2000
6. camel 160-250 25000-35000
7. hen ·50 70-80
)8
The following chart shows a comparison of the grain
and ghee prices in 40 years in sares (1 sare = 7.66 Kgs.)
39
firewood to the major centers by camels or trucks,
particularly in the cold winter. Other parts of the
branches, bark and roots are burned in the mountains to
make charcoal (skara) to be sold in the cities.
In recent years one camel load called waria of
lumber costs about 20,000 to 30,000 Afs. ($1 = 55 Afs.)
",
40
still the second major means of transportation in the
Zadran area and some other provinces in the country.
Agriculture:
Theform of cUltivation practiced among the Almara
-..;
villagers is intensive tilling. The major agricultural
"-
tools are the nail-plow (yew in Pashto and aspar in Persian);
zhagh or jagh (yoke), an implement which is set on the
necks of the draft animals with a plow fastened to it;
and mala (.J 1.0 ), a flat piece of wood about one to two
square meters broad and three to five centimeters thick.
After the land is plowed the cultivator levels the land
tract with mala by riding on it upright, leading the draft
animals. In Almara, oxen are driven back and forth on
the field until the furrows become leveled, the big pieces
of earth softened and the seed covered. Various kinds of
sickles, shovels and pickaxes are other important
agricultural instruments.
Among all these implements the plow is the basic and
most important one used by the peasants in Almara. It is
made by the peasant himself out of wood gathered in the
mountain forests or trees planted in areas near the village,
while the plowshare is made by a blacksmith in another
Zadran locality, or purchased in cities or tovms.
The Afghan nail-plow cuts the surface soil about
fifteen to twenty centimeters deep and mostly does not
turn it up. Its performance is very slow, and hence
41
plowing is a tedious job for the cultivator and his draft
animals, but it does a job as thorough as that
accomplished by a combination of modern machines.
The tracts of land are permanent, owned by the
native families and are kept fertilized with animal manure.
In very recent years chemical fertilizer was introd~ced
42
Considering the time spent at the various jobs, men
play the dominant role in sUbsistence pursuits, both in
agricultural and animal husbandry.
Men are mostly engaged in agricultural tasks such as
plowing, the harvest, making new fields, raising animals
and cutting trees, while women are responsible for.Fearing
children, conducting the house affairs, and occasionally
accompanying the men at the harvest time. Boys serve as
young shepherds, take food to the farms to their fathers
and brothers, and help them in harvesting and threshing
the rice and wheat crops, while girls help at home by
taking care of their brothers and sisters while the
mothers are busy, and carry water from the waterhole, the
stream and the river. Except for the educated portion of
the population (ten persons, officials and students) the
division of labor, the allocation of tasks, is based upon
age and sex.
Privately owned land is held by men and inherited in
the male line. Land is not sold to or purchased from
anyone except close agnates and close members of the lineage.
Because of the scarcity of cultivatible land, the arable
fields are considered by the Afghans in general and the
Almara people in particular as one of "the three Zs":
zan (woman) I zer (precious items such as silver and gold),
and zameen, meaning land. Unless the needy person cannot
find any other alternative and must sell it, the owner
43
seldom sells his land. Selling the land inherited from
one's father is generally considered to be shameful.
Almara villagers mainly cultivate cereals, of which
wheat, corn and rice are the most important and common.
The community bases its agriculture on a natural water
supply from rain, and the snow, accumulated throug~ the
winter, begins melting during the spring and continues
through summer. The people in the village do not cUltivate
dry land though this is common in other provinces in
Afghanistan. Originally the whole village's agriculture
was based upon one stream or ditch constructed along the
road, (linking Gardez, the capital city for the Paktya
Province, to Khost town,) which crosses the northern edge
of the village. The villagers built up a dike at the
Shamel River near Dwamedah about eight Krns. from the
community. The stream provides drinking water for the
people and their animals as well as for their irrigation
system.
Wheat is planted twice a year: in fall and spring.
The fall wheat CUltivation begins in early Meezan (September)
and ends in late Agrab (October). Wheat is planted where
corn, beans, clover were cultivated before. The
cultivator irrigates the farm and leaves it for three to
four days so that the surface water evaporates and the
plot becomes softer (~eter) for plowing. The oxen,
necessary implements such as plow, mala, () t.), jegh (yoke)
and the needed amount of seed are taken to the farm.
44
First, the seed is broadcast by hand. Then the land is
plowed over in close furrows from fifteen to twenty
centimeters deep and about five ~o ten centimeters apart.
Finally the furrows are leveled with mala. Very often the
land is plowed once. If the field is hard the villager
plows twice to make it softer. The fall wheat watani
'-
tukhm is cultivated in September and October, and
harvested in June. An improved variety (maksipak) planted
in spring is also harvested in June.
Rice, corn and beans are tilled in late June and
early July and harvested in September and October. Barley
is cultivated with spring wheat in March and harvested one
. month earlier than wheat.
The approximate yields per jarib and the cost of each
crop per sare in Afs. 1 Jarib = 2000 m2
1 Sare = 7.66 Kg. $1 = 55 Afs.
45
in storage (cold places) to be served in the winter. Some
people dry grapes and mulberries and eat them in the winter.
This is a common custom in Perwan and Kandahar provinces,
but not in Almara.
46
to Pakistan to buy bullocks for the spring planting. Also,
during the summer time or fall these villagers go to Kabul,
Kandahar or Gardez to buy sheep to be slaughtered in the
fall and dried (landy) for winter when meat is not
available in sufficient quantity. Baluchi and Arabic camels,
very efficient for wood, lumber, and other heavy transpor-
.....
Timber Industry:
The main sources of income in the village are wood
transportation (by camel or trucks) and wood products in
themselves. As it was noted before, the people of Almara
village own common mountain forests. These trees grow tall
and big and are commonly used in buildings, furniture and
truck body building industries within Afghanistan and
Pakistan. These trees are felled with steel axes and cut
into pieces. Lumber is hewed from the trunks. The
partially finished lumber, branches and other parts of the
trees are pulled down hills by hand and gathered in special
areas called hada where they are loaded on trucks or
camels for transport to internal or external markets.
A great number of oak, pine and spruce trees and
large amounts of tre remains from hewing are burned in huge
piles in order to make charcoal. To make charcoal, the
47
villagers gather a big pile of wood for burning. Dirt is
put on the fire to put it out. A few days later the pile
is dug up and the charcoal is loaded onto trucks or into
big sacks and tied on camels and transported to the
capital city, Kabul, and other major cities to be consumed
as fuel for cooking and heating. Charcoal making is
, very
destructive to the forest because there is no effective
reforestation program. However, it is a very common task
among these people. Some of the villagers conduct it as a
full time job by holding charcoal shops in Kabul and other
major cities.
In addition to the sources already discussed (lumber,
charcoal, other wood products and transportation) the
trading of almonds, pistachio nuts, tires and higher
quality clothing to Pakistan are also important. The
people involved in trading with Pakistan set up caravans
of from 20 to 400 camels that illegallyl export lumber
from Afghanistan. The Afghan government prohibits lumber
export to control deforestation, permit consumption of
wood within the country and control the water shed. More-
over, they load the animals with Pakistani products and
goods such as wheat, flour, cane sugar (gura), clothing,
shoes, plastic articles, fresh fruits such as different
kinds of oranges particularly during the winter. AlsQ,
a different variety of vegetables from Pakistan.
For many years the governments in Afghanistan have
not been able to stop this illegal flow of goods between
48
Afghanistan and Pakistan. The reasons for this state of
affairs are: (1) the proximity of these people to the
border which facilitates the transportation of goods; (2)
the openness of the border almost to the face of everyone;
(3) the poorness of the people due to the lack of land,
making other sources of income necessarYi and finally (4)
the lack of effective government programs providing
additional sources of income. The Pakistani products such
as footware, clothing, medicine, pots and pans, cloths
and others, having a very low quality, are sold in all
parts of the country.
Exchange Relationships:
To put the Almara villagers' exchange relationships
in a general context the data from the community indicates
that their economic system is similar to the fourth type
of the peasantry exchange relationship proposed by Wolf
(1966:37-48). The first type is the simplest one in
which a peasant household produces most of the agricultural
and craft services for itself, with only minimal ties
outside. The second type of peasantry exchange relation-
ship division of labor is defined. Villagers frequently
form corporations in which tillable land is held by a
group of cultivators.
The third type 2 of the peasant interchange is termed
sectional markets. This type of exchange relationship
involves periodic encounters in a market place. In this
system a market links a set of communities which are
scattered around it in radial fashion and each of these
communities may have its own economic specialty.
The fourth type of peasant exchange relationship
does not depend upon the traditional interchange of
customary monopolies in a closed regional system. We
borrow the network market term from John A. Barnes, who
has applied it to the social relationships observed among
a Norwegian fishing community, for this system which I
believe is also present among the Almara villagers. In
this form of social relationship, in addition to having a
different set of kinsmen, each individual has a different
set of friends and neighbors. Barnes (1954:39-58; and
1972:3-6) speaks of each person as being related to other
persons in a network. The network:
is a set of points some of which are
joined by lines. The points of image
are people, or sometimes groups, and
lines indicate whi~h people interact
with each other .... A network of this
kind has no external boundary, nor
has it any clear-cut internal divisions,
for each person sees himself at the
center of a collection of friends. (See
diagram number 1.)
Our interest in this case does not lie so much with
kin group, friends and neighbors, but with producers,
consumers and middlemen linked in ties of economic inter-
actions. I must note that the ties of kinship, friendship
and neighborhood represent relatively enduring ties among
the Almara villagers and elsewhere. The economic ties we
50
Diap;rwn II 1
Network Market
@ lterrese!1ts [rOUr
51
speak of may be purely temporary or may not last as long
as the other categories. Also, the exchange ties represented
by our model of the network market are a great deal more
shifting than those formed by a network of kinship or
friendship. In a kinship network ties are between two
particular persons and are relatively exclusive. B~t in
network market system ties are inherently subject to the
entry of third parties such as other producers, middlemen,
or consumers and these kinds of relationships are complex.
An Almara villager who sells charcoal in the winter
time in Kabul may have some special shopkeeper friends in
that city from whom he buys clothing. tea and other necessary
goods to take them back home:. He may kr!ow some other shop-
keepers in Gardez where he purchases wheat, flour and corn.
He may have ties with a butcher in the city of Khost where
he buys meat and vegetables and other goods. The same
individual may sell his lumber to specific individuals in
Pakistan through a middleman who was introduced to him by
a friend. He may also purchase specific goods such as
cane sugar, flour, corn, wheat, plastic items, footware
from individuals in Pakistan and on many occasions he may
accommodate these Pakistani individuals in his house when
they come to Afghanistan to buy almonds, pistachio nuts,
fine clothing, silk and other fine threads, tires and
other items which are 'scarce and expensive in Pakistan.
One may observe, for example, some members of family
A helping the members of family B in harvesting and
52
threshing the rice crop, while on another occasion some
members of family B may take the opportunity to help
family A when they construct a men'sJ house (mahman-khana,)
in front of their hamlet (generalized reciprocity). Or
on another occasion one family may give a certain amount
of wheat to another family·when it is needed and the
, latter
may return the debt in cash or in kind within a limited
time period (balanced reciprocity). But I believe that
the network market system is the integrative principle of
exchange for the entire culture in the area.
In short, this chapter has dealt with Almara villagers'
subsistence technologies and their economy. Agriculture
and some animal husbandry are the major subsistence
pursuits. As long as the elements of time contribution,
and difficult plantation and herding tasks are considered,
males play the predominant role in their sUbsistence
technologies. Lack of sufficient arable land compels
people to trade wood and conduct other tasks such as
involvement in transportation affairs, and internal and
external commerce. The industry of wood and the trading
relations of the Almara villagers weld these people with
people and markets within and outside the country. These
interlocking trading and exchange relationships can be
characterized as a network market.
In the following chapter we discuss the systems of
kinship, family and kinship terminology within the frame-
53
work of the technological and economic systems and their
functions among the Almara villagers.
54
FOOTNOTES TO CHAPTER II
55
CHAPTER III
56
and real behavior of the people by study or
kinship practices.
3. Kinship study is u~eful for r~storical
reconstructions.
4. Understanding of kinship behavior is invaluable
for the anthropologist in the field. AmoQg many
peoples kinship is the basis for most behavior
and the anthropologist quickly makes sense of
why people interact in the way they do once he
understands their kinship systems.
5. Analysis of the meaning of kinship terms has led
to new understanding of how people view the
world or at least how they make classifications of
parts of it.
6. Kinship systems are relatively easy to identify
and lend themselves to fairly simple analyses.
7. Finally many other aspects of the nature of
society had been examined at some length by other
social theorists before anthropology became a
well-formulated social science - thus,
anthropologists concentrated in the area which
was neglected before.
Descent:
Descent among the Almara villagers is reckoned
strictly in the male line. An individual traces his (her)
biological and jural descent patrilineally. Based upon
57
the principles of this ~escent pattern, a mother has no
rights which she could transfer to her children, either in
her marital or her natal homei nor does she control any
productive resources. Although Pashtun wives play
important roles in domestic, cultural and animal husbandry
affairs, they are still dependent on their husbands, ~
58
children in the whole village. A divorced man cannot
live in the community. The word zantalag (one who has
divorced his wife) is a great insult to a pashtun.
Attempting such deeds will not only damage a husband's or
his father's reputation and status in the community, but
would cause great shame and dishonor for his (pred~~essors)
59
In connection to the unilineal descent system in
Swat, Barth has written that:
A unilineal descent system is based on
the recognition, for culturally defined
purposes, of unilineal succession and the
equivalence of siblings. These two elements
are present among Swat Pathans in the
form of an ideology of respect for one's
father and father's father and solidarity ~.
between brothers . . . (1959a:23)
The elements of unilineal succession and the equivalence
of siblings are present among the Almara villages as well.
Regard for one's father, grandfather and other close elderly
agnates is characterized by name avoidance. It is shameful
to mention the personal names of one's own close agnatic
ascendants: to do so would be disrespectful to them. An
individual avoids mentioning the personal name of someone's
father who is present. Moreover, respect for one's father
and close agnatic ascendants and kin who are alive is
indicated by (1) walking behind them: (2) avoiding smoking
and being bare headed in their presence: (3) standing up
when they enter a room and (4) by abiding by their order.
An individual not doing so would be disrespectful to them
and he would be called behaya (impolite). A father's
authority is recognized throughout his life; relation between
father and son are usually formal and a strong tie of
affection and loyalty is assumed. Relations with one's
father's father are more light-hearted and intimate.
Mutual trust between brothers is expected. There is
some recognition of primogeniture particularly in the succession
60
of formal and informal offices such as headmanship in
the family and in the community and distinction between
masher (senior) and kasher (junior) brothers. Each man
does not establish a separate domestic unit upon marriage
and the inheritance is not divided between brothers after
the death of the father.
Allocation of Inheritance
The meerath (inheritance) is used very often in
Pashto. Theoretically, and based on Islamic laws, wives,
husbands, daughters, mothers, fathers, sons, sisters and
others inherit a certain portion of the estate left after
the death of their relatives. In practice the Pashtuns
in rural Afghanistan, in general, and the Almara villagers,
in particular distribute the property left after the death
of their close relatives only among the deceased's close
male waratha (heirs). Asking for one's wife's inheritance
share, for example, after her father's death is regarded as
socially unacceptable in Almara. This is why some members
of other ethnic groups in Afghanistan profess, at least
half-jokingly, to believe that the Pashtuns accepted one
half of the Quran.
Before discussing the allotment of taraka (inheritance)
in more detail four important points need to be mentioned.
1. Rights related to the estate left by the deceased
are:
(a) hag ayni, the right which relates to the estate
itself. For example, if a murthen (person who mortgages)
61
mortgages an estate he has priority before all other burial
ceremony expenses, bequests and heirs.
(b) Takfeen and tadfeen which includes all
expenses incurred, related to the deceased from the time of
death till his burial.
(c) Payment of the deceased's debts must ....be paid
after the payment of hag ayni, takfeen and tadfeen if anything
is left from the deceased's property.
(d) After the payment of a, b, and c, the
special bequests have to be paid. Each person has the right
to bequeath one-third of his (her) estate to special
individuals even for non-he·irs. To bequeath more than
one-third of the estate an individual needs the permission
of his (her) heirs.
(e) If after the payment of a, b, c and d,
anything is left from the deceased's property, the heirs
are entitled to inherit and divide the estate based upon
Islamic rules.
2. Merath 2 agarib or relatives'''shares'': there are
three categories:
(a) ashab foroz which includes the individuals who
according to Quranic verses inherit one-third and one-sixth
of what the deceased leaves. Foroz is the plural form of
Arabic farz meaning being determined and described. Since
the "share" of thes e relatives are determined and cEscribed
precisely one-third and one-sixth in the Quran, these
relatives are called Ashab el foroz. Ashab el foroz
62
includes father, mother, daughter, son's daughter, sister
(~ini khur, Pashtun; khwaher ~ini, Persian), father's
sisters (trur, Pashto; ~ma, Persian), mother's sisters
(trur, Pashto; Khala, Persian), father's father, mother's
father, and mother's brother.
(b) Father's relatives are persons who a~~ related
through a male line to the deceased and are not separated
by a female from the deceased in the descent line. Women
included in this category are sisters (khwaharan ~~ni),
sisters related through a father, daughters, son's daughters
and son's son's daughters.
(c) Relatives with the common origin are father's
sisters, mother's sisters and brothers, brothers' daughters,
and father's brothers' daughters.
3. Islamic law identifies two factors which result
in disinheritance: murder and nationality.
(a) Based on one hadith ("traditions" of the
Prophet Muhammad) all of the jurists are agreed no persons
can inherit from another whom he has slain, either by design
or by accident.
(b) Most of the Islamic jurists believe that a
Muslim cannot inherit from a non-Muslim deceased's estate
and vice versa. The apostasy of an heir excludes him from
any legacy, and so also would the fact of his being an
unbeliever. Bastardy excludes from inheritance from the
father but not from the mother.
63
4. A testator may, by established custom based
upon tradition, make bequests to the extent of not more
than one-third of his or her property remaining after
payment of all debts.
Inheritance Allotment
Islamic laws identify the following rules relating
to the succession of property to the waratha left after the
death of an individual:
Offsprings' "shares"
Allah (God) instructs you concerning your children:
for a male the same amount as for two females and if among
the waratha (heirs) there are more than two persons
(i.e. daughters), they are entitled to have two-thirds of
what the deceased leaves. When waratha is one female, then
let her have half of the taraka (inheritance). Where the law
is regarded, there is no recognition of primogeniture among
the Afghans. According to the Islamic law, all sons inherit
equal portions of their father's estate. A deceased person's
son, however young, takes precedence over a grandson. In
practice the eldest son has the advantage that he gets more
respect and therefore, may be given more of the estate left
from his fa theL Levy (1971) tells us that "daughters
are amongst the individuals who are specially mentioned by
the Quran as entitled to 'shares.' ~Vhere there are no sons,
an only daughter receives one-half of the estate after the
necessary deductions have been made for debts, burial
64
ceremonies and others, and two or more daughters receive
(among them) two-thirds. Where there is no other legal
heir, some codes assign the remainder of the estate also
to the daughter, or daughters, though others deny their
title to it . . . " (1971:145-6)
Dari (1968) explains the dec eased's parents I .~'shares"
65
one-half of the estates left by his deceased wives. If
there are children whether from a husband under consideration
or other husbands, after payment of the bequests, their
debts and their burial ceremony expenses, the later
husband is entitled to receive one-fourth of the estate
left by his wives.
Children's "shares related through mother
When the deceased is a kalala 3 (a man with deceased
father and having no sons) or a woman with siblings related
only through the mother4 , the heir inherits one-sixth of
the property left. If there is to be more than one heir,
they inherit one-third of the taraka ("share") altogether.
The "share" is allotted among them after payment of the
bequest and debt bequeathed by the marai (Pashto), mayit
(Arabic) .
Sisters' "shares"
When a deceased is a kalala, his sister inherits half
of his estate. In situations where the deceased is a
sister with no children the brother is her heir. When the
heirs are two sisters, they inherit two-thirds of the
deceased's estate. Where the heirs are brothers and sisters,
the males receive the double the amount of the females. 5
Lineages
The moral norms and jural rights discussed above
supply the basic ideology necessary for the maintenance of
agnatic descent groups. Radcliffe-Brown in his paper on
66
patrilineal and matrilineal succession (1936:32-48)
indicates that corporate unilineal descent groups only
emerge in relation to joint estates, that is to say, when
the members of the descent unit have a common stake in
something. To a great extent it is also true with Almara
villages. The land being very few ';arebs (1 Jareb.:: 2000 m2 )
is not owned by the members of lineage; ownership of land
is by nuclear or extended family. The only estate owned by
the members of the lineage is the mountains. Very often
several lineages own one mountain or a part of it jointly.
The common word for a patrilineal descent group in
Pashto language is -khel (lineage). Murdock (1940:46)
defines a lineage as "a consanguineal kin group. . . when
it includes only persons who can actually trace their
common relationship through a specific series of remembered
genealogical links. " Almost all men whatever their
khel's social and political status are able to name a khel
to which they claim to belong. Many of the adults can
trace their descent through their common ancestors if the
lineage is not very large and does not include many
generations. Thus a lineage is a group of people who not
only think of themselves as descended in one line from a
common ancestor, but who also claim to know what the
genealogical links between them are.
The word khel very often attaches itself as a suffix
to a name such as Zmel, Namet, Sedi, etc. and makes them
Zmel-khel, Namet-khel, Sedi-khel and Khoydad-khel
67
I'~spectively. The villagers have two views about their
ancestor, Zadran and brother(s) and they trace their
genealogies as shown in the ~ams number 2 and ).
The first view believes that Zadran's father was called
Tsarabring (Tserben) who lived in Birmel, Woch Largy or
Mergha in Wasiristand, West Pakistan. According to, this
view Zadran had two brothers: Mangel and ~ardok6 as
indicated in diagram number 2. The second view believes
that Zadran's father named Berhem the son of Kateran and
they lived their lives in Birmel in Waziristan.
The purposes of these diagrams are first to trace
the common ancestors of the Almara. Second, to demonstrate
the links among the lineages. Third, to indicate the
appropriate time these people and their ancestors spent 1n
the village, and fourth, to display the number of generations
following the founder, Zadran.
It should be mentioned that these lineages are not
exclusively indigenous and are very often localized.
Several men were reported to this researcher whose wives
were from other communities and even other clans and ethnic
groups. Membership in the lineage in the case of men is by
birth. Women who come from other lineages and ethnic
groups become a member of their husband's khel (lineage)
at the time of marriage and follow their husband's lineage
norms and customs. Members of a khel are obliged to assist
each other in times of disaster, mourning ceremonies, during
weddings and particularly in times of confrontations with
68
Kateran
l,-iardak Berham
---l
6 Beba-Khel
--_._--, 6.
Zadran
6.
~ardaK
Diar:ram II 3
Dari-lihel 6. Yahya-Khel
;;nsi..-
6. Khel
Zr..el-Khel
Jamek 6
I Jliwol
Diaeram II 2
Peerdad-Khel 6. 6 Ali-khel
Sapy-
Khel
Eisa[i
1- 1 Zareof
- -I 1
Serdarei Nurrudin
Shanek 6 Gulze~
I
6
I
6
6
I I
6
69
zm~l-khel
Khw&ja- Khel
A!eelll- tt)1el
Azmet Hazrati
NOWTOZ I i Mir
GIll Mir
Nasrull a O!man
Shukur
Dia~aJII # 4
70
other lineages and clans. I will discuss the last point
in more details in Chapter V.
Household Type
While we discuss the question of Family, the distinction
between household and family must be made. Surprisingly
"
Household
By household is meant a group of people living together
and forming a functioning domestic unit (Bohannan, 196):86;
Otterbein, 1972:45). In cases of Almara villagers usually
the group occupies a physical structure with walls and roofs
which are houses within a Kalai (hamlet) owned by several
householders or a kalai if the group is larger in number of
people. The people occupying the house or kali cooperate
in the domestic and subsistence affairs of the house.
Although not necessarily, the householders in the
village are usually kin groups. Occasionally some house-
holders hire a laborer or a shepherd, who is considered a
member of the household, for the agricultural tasks or for
the purposes of animal husbandry affairs. The members of
the group very often cook, eat, sleep and work jointly.
In eating, the villagers practice commonality. The food is
71
prepared by the women in the common hearth, and then is
divided in two parts. One part is taken to the men's
house (hujra or guest house) by the teenage boys and is eaten
together by all male members in the household and their
guests, if any. The other portion is eaten within the house
by the female members of the household and female g~ests,
if any.
All the inhabitants of rural Afghanistan in general
and the Almara villagers in particular usually sit on the
floor and it is considered normative and polite to be
squatted especially when one serves his or her meal or
sitting in the presence of his or her elderly relatives.
Before the meal is brought to the men's house a youngster
is expected to bring some warm water in a pitcher (Kuza)
and a basin (chalamchi). He begins from the very holy man,
if present, or from the most elderly men or from the highest
level official present. Then the tablecloth (dester-khwan),
mostly made of wool from one to three square meters or a
piece of cloth is brought in which the Afghan bread (marai,
dodi, pastai, Pashto) is wrapped. Finally, the main meal
is carried to the room while depending on the number of the
people present they will sit in one circle or several circles.
Since the Almara people very often serve rice and soup
(chicken or beef or lamb) called dandakai or soup and
bread called shoorwa (Pashto and Persian) in the evenings
and they use a talber (a big bowl) very often from two to
eight persons sit around one talber, food container, and
72
serve their meal. This researcher on many occasions witnessed
standing teenagers holding a drinking water pitcher in their
hand till everybody was satisfied. While the meal is being
served, boys. girls and women wait to serve the men. After
serving the elders and the guests. boys depart and eat.
Girls also then serve their meal with their mothers. ",.
This
signifies respect and hospitality in the case of the owner
of the house.
In short. the households in Almara are charged
Family
In distinction. the family in Almara is a kinship
group which maintains kinship relationships and the members
mayor may not live in one physical structure at one time
together. The common type of the Kurany (family) is the
extended family. Of 136 families resident in the community.
41 included 10 ur iliOn:: members and 129 of them are extended
families. By extended family in reference to the Almara
villagers. I mean a kinship group consisting of three or
more successive generations of related individuals which
73
may include one or more marital groups in each of two
adjacent generations. The members of the group if present
in the village live together. Some of the members of the
family may live in another province and even out of the
country but are still considered as members of the family
in the village. Any kind of income and benefit coming
.....
74
tolerance for extended families among agriculturalists is
probably related to their ownership of property, especially
land:
If division results in many small pieces,
each member of the family owning and working
his own piece, the system becomes relatively
unproductive. There is a disposition under
the circumstances to hold the family's lan~
intact and to add to it if possible.
(196o:220)
Extended families as Pasternak (1976:91) believes
are also quite advantageous in pastoral societies where
benefits can often be obtained from cooperation in the herding
of animals. In brief, then, although we cannot predict family
type simply on the basis of the nature of their technology,
it is clear that some types of families are more likely to
occur and be more functional in certain technological contexts
than in others. In the following section we discuss
another important anthropological issue which concerns
kinship terminology system and its significance in reference
to the familial and kin relationships.
Kinship Terminology
Anthropologists for sometime have been interested in
the way people refer to their relatives because the terms
they use can provide information about other aspects of
culture, social behavior and social organization. For these
same reasons, the study of nomenclature systems can also
be of practical value to those interested in problems of
cultural change or ethnohistorical reconstructions. In this
75
section, we will examine the nomenclatural systems that
the Almara villagers and other Pashtuns of Afghanistan employ
and discuss a few of the things that one may learn from them.
76
just as he may sometimes address nonsiblings as "Yi1:..Q1:"
77
applied in an extended sense, usually in a classificatory
manner.
In the ascending generation, the grandparents, FaFa
(Nika) and MoFa (Nika) and are not differentiated and are
referred by one term nika. On the same token, there is one
classificatory term for FaMo and 000000, nya. .....
78
term mamazoy is implied for MoBrSo and the term mamalur for
his daughter.
Barth (1959:110) was not able to understand this
point. According to his diagram (1959a:llO) he believes
that the Pashtuns apply the terms wror (Br) and Khor (Si)
equally to paternal and maternal aunts' sons and daughters
respectively, which is wrong. The terms Wrara for BrSo,
Wrera for BrDa; khorye for SiSo and khorza for SiDa are
applied. SoSo and DaSo are both referred by the same term
nmase or Lmase; SoDa and DaDa are also referred by nmasei
or Imasei terms. Barth (1959:110) again gives us the wrong
terms which are the combination of Persian and Pashto words
for these two categories of kins. The term nawasa is a
Persian kinship term referring to grandchild of both sexes
and it is not grammatically correct in Pashto to add Pashto
suffixes to a Persian word to make it a Pashto kinship term.
Terms for further descending generations--(somewhat hypo-
thetical and not widely known) are karvl8.se (1S'J/) for girl
and karwas ei ( (y.Jf) for boy.
Members of the maternal lineage are collectively
called mamakhel and by lineal extension, all such males may
be addressed as~. There is no collective term in Pashto
for paternal lineage, but when a person is asked who he is.
he identifies himself with his present khel. if the question
is very specific. he would identify himself with his
sublineage (korane or plargane).
79
ghornik rornik
mam-~TL-
.shaze ma!na
tror
mor U::;=6 p1ar trOJ L:.T Cdrendartror.
-L
T(ZO"'O)
mar.i~lur
m~zoo r-:Jei
tcrl trQz:ro~
zome
L l l.
-
J.l
-l.
'6
lr
70e
enc:ur
enc:ur
==0
==0 wrar terla 0
I
1
terbur
I
-[
II
0
co
II
r-4 II P-
on P-
ili
~
1 i L~ .:; °rl
....
1
Ul-.t::
c... ~
I -<
C to
oc
0 6
I lc..se
u /:::.--,-,
v 0 6=== L
~
II
't:I o~ n 'rl 0
-.->·rl
d+'
rlQ
1 ~ f!QlH
Imase: lmasei/ lmase
lm::J
lmnse 1111:15ei It". r-4
"
I!
104
<30 II
~ II
•
+>
II 11 Q)
u., +' t::l
~ '"~ P-
II Q) III t: c
rl °rl 0 °rl
I
Q)
b
r-I III HOr-l
~
°rl
..c: HUl.D
~ ~ :.-<0
]mrwasei
~ o
kurwase 6
~urW'ase~
°
kurwase
II
....A g "c: orl
III C)°rl
<= 'tj :n
t.> .Ill
Affinal Terminology
The affinal terminologies illustrated by diagrams 6
Diagra # 6
khwkhe ekher
or khwnahe
r
•
=0
wret EGO
_ ' ') sh ze " \
-:>-- (kh ze)
( mandana)
....
khwai5hine
(khiTle) 1
ukhehe
(ukha)
r
Diagr.... i; 7
EGO
- lIIara o
ndor
I
I
1=1
hWu" ,.Ur
81
referred to as ndror. Referential terms for husband's brother
and his wife are lewar and yur respectively. The term for
MaBr, mama, is also very often used vocatively to senior men
with ~hom an individual wishes to emphasize intimacy,
though never to a senior agnate. Aba, ada, aya, kaka and
others are used for this purpose for one's agnates .
.....
82
Radcliffe-Brown (1952:29) has summed this up in his phrase
"the merging of generations." In Afghanistan like many
other people of the world it is said that grandparents spoil
their granchildren. They can afford to do so, for they
do not have the responsibility as the children parents have,
of disciplining them and bringing them up in accordance
with approved social norms. Also, members of the grand-
parents' generation, unlike those of the parental one, do
not feel their status to be threatened by the growing
generation of grandchildren. They are already, as it were,
"out of the race," for they have already been replaced by
their own children. For these reasons the relationship
between grandparents and grandchildren is usually free
and easy.
One specific point about the negative meanings implied
by some of the kin terms deserves a further note. The
terms ben for HW and torbur for FaBrSo imply hostility and
animosity. The reasons are obvious: Ego's ben is an
individual who "shares" a husband with her. No one would
like the idea. FaBr in the absence of son is the closest
heir, by the same token his sons are the potential heirs.
In Pashtun culture, no one likes to be without sons and
does not approve of his property left after death being
distributed, except for his sons, among his other heirs.
Since FaBrSos are potential heirs for one's father's estate,
a feeling of antagonism prevails among them about this
particular issue.
8)
To which type of terminological system the Pashtun
nomenclature belongs is another question to be discussed.
As noted in diagram 5 on page 80 all cousins, except for
the offspring of MoSi and FaSi, are referred to by different
kin terms; and also these terms are different from those
by which one's brothers and sisters are referred to.....
MoSiSo and FaSiSo are called trurzei; MoSiDa and FaSiSo
are called trurze and both of these terms are, however,
different from what an individual calls his Br and Si.
Therefore, I categorize the Pashtuns terminological system
under Sudanese type.
To summarize, this chapter has dealt with the
Almarawals kinship, descent, family and nomemclature systems.
Their system of descent is parilineal and the system of
patrilineage prevails among them. The system of extended
family is very common in the area. I classified their
kinship terminological system as Sudanese type. I briefly
discussed how the villagers categorize their kinsmen and
kin terms and more important how they think about them.
I did not deal with the social communities only as systems
of action. I vas concerned with them also and essentially
as involving systems of ideas and meanings. In the coming
84
FOOTNOTES FOR CHAPTER III
85
CHAPTER IV
86
(1971:151) and others have given definition(s) of marriage
and have discussed it in full 1 but when the same term
"marriage" is used cross-culturally the field of meaning
must be vastly reduced. The marriage of an Iranian Prince
is not quite the same thing as the marriage .of a man in
Almara village. The reasons for this difference l~~ in
the fact that there are a good number of different customs
associated in these two societies.
All these indicate how difficult it is to arrive at
a definition of marriage that will satisfy all situations
and be acceptable to all social scientists. It is better
to avoid becoming obsessed with the task of formulating a
definition without exceptions or objections. The best
definition for marriage is the one which complies with and
embraces the majority of the ethnographic cases.
Gough's (1968) observations among the Nayars have
prompted her to suggest another definition of marriage
which seems to be wider in scope:
Marriage is a relationship established between
a woman and one or more other persons,
which provides that a child born to the
woman under circumstances not prohibited by
the rules of the relationship, is accorded
full birth-status rights common to normal
members of his society or social stratum
(1968:68).
Gough's definition has helped to dispel the notion
of nuclear family universality. She insists that marriage
occurs in most if not all societies, including the Nayars
of Malabar. It is unlikely that the matter has been
87
resolved with Gough's definition (Harris 1971:173-175).
I believe it is not really vital that we establish that
all people have marriage. It is far more important that
we adopt a clear and explicit definition that will embrace
most ethnographic cases and that we concentrate our efforts
rather on relating "marriage" so defined to other c.!lltural
phenomena. Gough's definition serves us quite well.
In order to understand the Almara villagers customs
relating to marriage we must realize that a marriage is
in essence a rearrangement of soci~l structure. 2 By a
marriage in the village of Almara and elsewhere in the
world certain existing relationships particularly those of
the bride to her family are changed. New social relations
between the husband and the wife, and between the husband
and wife's relatives and between wife and husband's
relatives on the one side and between the husband and
those of wife's relatives who are interested in the process
on the other side are created. To put this in another
way, a marriage in the village of Almara is not simply a
union of a man and a woman. Essentially, as the alliance
theorists believe, social groups are separated and equal
and all exogamous groups from the nuclear family to a
moiety, are functionally dependent on another wife-giving
and wife-taking group. The bonds that integrate them into
the larger society are those of organic solidarity, and
those bonds are expressed in the exchange of women
(Graburn 1971-213). Later we will examine the functions of
88
exchange of women which result in groups and societal
solidarity and alliance not only in normal situations, but
also in the incident of conflicts and feuds.
Two kinds of marriages are observed among the Pashtuns
of Afghanistan. I label them as "normal" and "abnormal"
marriages. The normal marriage is a natural procesp and
it usually occurs when boys' and girls' parents understand
that their offsprings are mature adults now and need to
be married. The abnormal marriage happens, though in
recent years very rarely, whenever there is a bloodshed and
the litigants want the dispute to be resolved peacefully.
The slayer pays the nake (bloodprice). The bloodprice for
a slain individual in addition to a payment of 60,000 Afs.
and two sheep is a unmarried girl.
The normal marriage may proceed by stages as follows:
(1) search for a bride; (2) betrothal; (3) Pasharat; and
(4) marriage ceremony.
89
girl, who may be a prospective husband and wife, cannot have
any type of sexual relationship. Even they are not
socially permlited to talk to each other before their
marriage. If a girl and a boy start to establish a
relationship before their engagement and it is knovm to
the girl's parents and brothers and the villagers, ~er
father or brothers will kill both the girl and the boy.
The marriage is arranged by the parents in the
village. Therefore, the initiative may begin with the
sending of a go-between and then commence by a visit from
the mother or aunt of the boy to the house of the girl's
parents. There are also what I prefer to call professional
matchmakers, very often old women and widows, who have
easy access to women folk and also have enough information
about the prospective bride's character and skills. After
two or three trips to the bride's parents' house and
watching the girl working or walking in the house or in
many cases talking, and serving food with her present,
the boy's mother will discuss the matter with her mother
and her other female relatives in the family. The girl's
mother reports the case to her husband and his brothers.
If the agreement is arrived at, the prospective bride's
and groom's fathers and other close relatives such as
brothers and uncles meet to discuss the final terms of
marriage. Then a formal deputation (roybar) is sent to
ask the girl's hand in marriage. The amount of welwer
90
(bridewealth) is settled with the girl's father or her
guardian (wali) and a day for formal kozda (Pashto) or
namzadi (Persian), meaning betrothal or engagement is
fixed.
Betrothal:
The betrothal ceremony is a khwara (big feast-)
prepared in the bride's father's house and most of the
eXpenS(3S are paid by the bridegroom's father. The expenses
for that night could be listed as one or two sheep, seven
to fourteen kilograms margarine or ghee, forty to seventy
kilograms of rice, sweets, tea and sugar. The number of
males and females invited for the feast and the amount of
gift exchange are determined by the two parties in advance.
The relatives and friends invited by the groom's father or
brother get together in the groom's father's house. Early
in the evening the groom's party including the groom,
leave for the bride's father's house. In the procession
the musicians and drummers play their musical instruments
and the dancers dance the Afghan national dance; by
turning around, jumping up and down and to the right and
the left and shaking their long hair they indicate their
happiness. The people carrying their rifles, shotguns and
pistols on their shoulders in the procession show their
happiness by firing into the air.
When they arrive at the,bride's father's house the
group is welcomed by a group of respected and elderly
91
people and the guests are led to the place which is well
furnished with Afghan rugs (ghalai, tagher), pillows
(balisht) and tushaka. All of the guests are served a good
meal and tea.
After the meal is served many jokes are exchanged
between the elderly men of the two groups. A typic~l
example is "The meal has been served and we cannot see any
reason why you are not leaving." The groom's group members
will respond by saying that they have a purpose for
sitting there and that is to offer "our son as your son,"
meaning as son-in-law. After joking some more one of the
experienced members of the bride's relatives on behalf of
his group will show their happiness and willingness about
the marriage. He then asks the imam present to read a few
verses from the Quran. The imam recites some verses and
then asks all the people present to pray for the happiness
and good luck of the parties involved and for a life-time
of good relations between the bride and the groom. Now,
the boy and the girl are formally engaged.
Bride wealth:
The groom's father, uncle or brother sits near to
one of the bride~ relatives and gives him one third or half
of the bride wealth in cash. The amount of bride wealth
is defined among the Almara villagers precisely and it is
16,000 Afs. ($1 = 50 Afs.) plus about 280 kgs. long grain
rice, 28 kgs. margarine, some lamb and ground beef to be
92
prepared for the guests from both sides on the marriage
cermony day (wada ~).
93
round and full face with a high and thin nose. Her fingers
should be long and her eyes should be wide and large. Her
skin must be tender and she should have a small mouth and
white teeth.
According to the Islamic principles after the
engagement night (cozda shpa) the groom is allowed-xo visit
his wife (shaz) in her father's house. Some people approve
of the idea of groom and bride visiting (choghelbazi) in
the bride's house before the marriage ceremony. When this
is not the case, the groom will not be able to see his
"wife" probably for one more year until the marriage
ceremony is ended and the bride is tranferred to the
groom's father's house. Even if the groom was permitted to
go to his father-in-Iaw's house and visit his "wife," it
is socially forbidden to have intercourse with her.
Virgini ty:
Virginity is highly esteemed on the part of girls in
Afghanistan. The groom's mother in particular is responsible
for testing her daughter-in-Iaw's virginity. The procedure
involves putting a piece of white cloth in her son's and
daughter-in-Iaw's bed during the first night (nekah shpa,
Pashto, shab zafaf, Persian) when the couple go to bed in
the groom's father's house. If the evidence of blood is
found on the cloth, it signifies the virginity.
I believe the first reason for this rigid custom is
to be obedient to what Islam says. Based upon Islamic law
premarital sexual relationship is zana (adultery) and it is
extremely prohibited. Second, it has two functions: (a)
the presence of virginity indicates that the girl has not
had any premarital sexual relationship. It is considered
good manners and it is the norm among the Pashtuns. I
believe this is the manifest function of virginity~ (b)
The essence of this strict custom lies in its latent
function. Among the people who are mostly uneducated and
are not aware of the means and methods of birth control,
this type of custom is developed in order to control the
population growth in a meager habitat which cannot support
dense population. This practice also helps to prevent
promiscuous behavior and the possibility of venereal
disease especially among the young.
95
provided with a fine handmade decorated handkerchief, made
by the bride, with a gold needle attached to it. This
piece of cloth is fixed to the turban of one of the groom's
male relatives signifying once again an official engage-
.
ment of the girl and the boy. As soon as the groom's
relatives leave tlB bride's father's house the grouRproceeds
to the edge of the hamlet and fires guns in the air to show
its happiness. In this way the engagement of the boy and
the girl is announced to the public.
One or two months after this event, the groom's father
invites his daughter-in-Iaw's relatives and prepares for
them a melmustia (a big dinner) and this time the groom
and his relatives present their new male and female close
relatives with turbans and clothing for females dresses
respectively as gifts. I believe the exchange of the gifts
between the two allied groups serve at least two functions.
First, it intensifies the ties of relatedness and intimacy
between the two groups (manifest functions), and secondly,
it serves to distribute wealth among the villagers Uatent
function).
Marriage Ceremony:
The fourth stage of the marriage process is the
marriage ceremony. Very often if the bride and the groom
both are of the proper marriage age usually between 20 to
30, the marriage ceremony will occur after a lapse of one
or one and a half years from the betrothal day. During the
marriage ceremony which lasts at least three days. all of
the relatives and friends of the husband and wife are
invited. In this ceremony again a great amount of rice.
margarine or ghee, beef and lamb, tea. sugar and sweets
are consumed. Once again certain amounts of gifts in the
form of cash or clothing are exchanged.
Among the Pashtuns, except for the bride wealth, the
amount of gifts being exchanged are approximately equal.
If for instance, 20 silk turbans and about 100 meters of
clothing of good quality for women dress and about 180
handkerchiefs are given from the bride's father's side
about the same amount will be given from the groom's
father's side. From this data we can see that many people
are involved in the marriage processes and ties.
In the present,many people in Afghanistan and other
Middle Eastern nations think of the bride wealth institution
as a characteristic of a transaction of purchase and sale.
This is particularly true among the educated people of the
area. as among the laymen in Western societies it is
considered a bad manner and a "negative" custom. It is true
that payment of 50,000 to 100,000 Afs. in cash for bride
wealth and about 50.000 Afs. in kind for other marriage
Axpenses and exchange of gifts is a great amount of money
for a 20 year old boy &nd his father. But we have to
consider the status of women if we discard this custom.
Evans-Pritchard (1952:115) warns us about the lowering of
the woman's status. In addition, the population explosion
97
is another possible consequence of abandoning this
institution. I cannot predict anything about the negative
effects of the elimination of bride wealth on the status
of women at present.
The idea of exchange of gifts and the institution 01'
98
leave for the bride's father's house in order to transfer
the bride (~) to the 'groom's father's house.
Near to the bride's father's house the group of
people called worabani (male relatives and close friends)
very often faces resistance and sometimes teenager boys
throw stones toward them and do not allow them to approach
the bride's house. Some other young relatives of the
bride go to the big group of the invited people (~ora)
99
bride at her marriage from her father's house to her
husband's house, that is to say, the practice of
patrilocality, produces a temporary disequilibrium. The
bride's removal is a loss for her small and close-knit
family group and disturbs the situation. The intrusion of
a stranger into a group of kin is similarly a dist~~bance.
100
sent to the bride, who is with the female members of the
new family and some women from her father's group, to be
asked who her pader wakeel (the person who could negotiate
with her husband about her maher) is. Maher is the amount
of money (10 Arabic Derhem minimum and no maximum limit;
5 Derhem = $1), which according to the Islamic law-goes
directly to the bride. The bride is customarily supposed
to resist for awhile, and keep quiet until the two
witnesses have come to her several times. Finally, she
chooses one of the groom's close relatives as her pader
wakeel (guardian) and the two witnesses report the case
to the imam and then the imam negotiates the maher with
him. After the pader wakeel becomes satisfied with the
amount of maher, the imam asks the guardian three times if
he has given and if he is going to give his "daughter" to
the groom for the maher determined. Pader-wakeel must
confess three times that he was and he is going to give his
"daughter" to the groom for the amount of maher determined.
The imam asks the groom if he accepts the bride for the
maher which was determined. After a positive response
from the groom, the imam reads a few verses from ~uran in
the presence of the individuals gathered. At this moment
the groom holds a big knife in his hands, symbolizing a
warning to anyone who has the intention to harm him, and
''makes him idle" (impotent) by magic. 6 It is believed that
when the imam reads verses (Khotba), from the Quran and
someone knots a piece of thread or rope and keeps it knotted
101
or throws it somewhere the groom may become impotent. Thus
when the imam reads the khotba, the groom withdraws and
reinserts the knife from its cover to destroy the magic,
if there is any. After the khotba was read the couple is
legally married and their offspring are considered their
legitimate children.
The bride's and the groom's parents will wait
impatiently until they hear that the bride is pregnant.
The couple and their parents will become very happy if the
first child is a boy and it is, I believe, due to the
prevalence of the system of patrilineality which favors
boys over girls. If a boy is born to the new couple, again
there will be exchanges of gifts in cash and in kind between
the bride's and the groom's relatives. Much food will be
served and sweets will be distributed.
On the third day after the child's birth the imam
is asked to come to the house and announce Islam to the
child by conducting the Azan,7 the Hananfi call to prayer:
Allah 0 Akbar (four times) (God is most great)
Ashhadu AlIa ilaha illallah (twice) (I testify that
there is no God but Allah)
Ashhadu anna Muhammadur Rasulellah (twice) (I testify
that Muhammad is the messenger of God)
Hyya ella s-salah (twice) (revive for prayer or come
to prayer)
Hayya ella 'l-falah (twice) (come to prosperity)
102
Allah u Akber (twice) (God is most great)
La illaha illallah (There is no God but Allah)
After conducting this religious rite which I may
call it a rite of passage, the child is considered as a
Muslim individual. People believe that the child, although
as yet immature, becomes conscious of his (her) faith.
The important impediments to Muslim marriage are
given in the Quran. Chapter 4, verse 2), of the Holy Book
stipulates the kinship, affinal and foster prohibitions
as follows:
Forbidden to you are your mothers, your
daughters, and your sisters, and your
father's sister, and your mother's
sister, and your brother's daughters,
and your sister's daughters, and your
foster-mothers, and your foster
sisters, and your mother-in-law, and
your stepdaU$hters who are under your
protection Lborn7 of your women to
whom you have gone in-but if you have
not gone into them, then it is no sin
for you ~o marry their daughter~ -
and the wives of your sons who /spring7
from your ovm loins. And litis -
forbidden to yo~ that you should have
two sisters together, except what hath
already happened LOf that nature,? in
the past. Look! Allah is ever
Forgiving, Merciful (Pickthal 1957:95).
Intercourse among all men and women except for the
wives and husbands is considered ~ (big sin). Having
coitus even with one's own wife while she is having haiz
(menstrual cycle) or nafas (time between child birth and
regaining the menstrual cycle) is forbidden religiously.
Related to Islamic principles is a prohibition of having
sexual intercourse on the part of both husband and wife.
10)
After the child is born, at least, until after the woman's
lochia has stopped and her wounds healed and she regains·
her regular menstrual cycle, the husband and the wife
cannot have communion. The post-partum sex taboo 8 (narawa
or haran) is a rule among the Almara villagers and all
other Muslims which lasts for forty days. After tQe forty
days after the birth there are no religious and/or social
negative sanctions with regard to sexual relationships
between husband and wives. The wives resist having coitus
with their husbands for at least one year after the birth
of a child. The people under study believe that a pregnant
woman should not nurse her child because her milk is not
healthy.
Polyganous Marriage:
In principle (the Almara villagers not being an
exceptional case) all Afghan ethnic groups are polyganous.
Islamic laws permit a man four wives. In practice usually
people cannot afford it and it seems to me that the
institution may diminish in the near future. The factors
are many fold: (1) high amount of bride wealth payments.
(2) Great amount of expenditure for gift exchange. (J)
104
Although it is difficult to trace the origin of the
institution the history of Islam enlightens us that at the
dawn of Islam, when many of the Arabs and other Muslims
fighting (ghazawat) to extend Islam, many men were killed
(shaheed) for their faith. Consequently, many women were
widowed. Mohammed being aware of the situation, permitted
"-
and even encouraged the Sohaba 9 (Mohammad's Companions)
to have more than one wife.
This point supports Linton's (1968:86) view that
there were more females than males in many primitive
societies, probably because men engaged in more dangerous
occupations and because of higher infant mortality rates
among males. Mckusick has reported the cause of higher
infact mortality among human beings as follows:
The ratio of males to females observed at
birth is called the secondary sex ratio
and is about 1.06 in whites in the United
States. The primary sex ratio, that of the
zygotes, is considerably higher, perhaps
1.;0. The reason that Y-bearing sperm have
an advantage over the X-bearing sperm in
fertilization is unknown. Whatever the
explanation, sex chromatin studies of early
embryos show an excess of males in a ratio
of about i.; to females. What accounts for
the decline in the ratio between conception
and birth? One possibility is that a
proportion of male zygotes succumb to X-
linked recessive lethals, but there is
little direct evidence to support this
plausible explanation. Another possibility
is that the female with two X chromosomes
enjoys heterotic vigor. Certainly the
female has a greater survival throughout
the span of life, both intra- and extra-
uterine. The two sexes become numerically
equal in middle life and in the older age
groups women are more numerous than men
(Mckusick 1964:81).
105
Ember (1974a) also found that polygynous societies
were significantly more likely to have an unbalanced sex-
ratio in favor of females than those which were monoganous.
I believe the system of patrilineality is the factor
most responsible for the practice of polygyny. The
importance of the male, trac ing one's genealogy and.
identity through the male line plus the question of
inheritance forced the people to develop the system of
polygyny not only in the village of Almara but among all
the Pashtuns of Afghanistan. Thus, when polygyny occurs
it is usually because the first wife has no male children.
In any case, polygyny is dying out and the investigator in
the village of 136 households witnessed the occurrence of
only six incidents of polygynous marriages.
Three cases of levirate and one case of sororate was
reported to this researcher. In the case of Almara
villagers the two brothers' widows were married to the
younger brothers who were not married. The third one was
married to the second brother and only brother left who
already had another wife. The sororate case happened when
an individual died because of tuberculosis. The widower
did not want to break his ties with his in-laws and he
married his sister-in-law (khena) after his wife's death.
106
fundamentally egalitarian nature of the Pashtun society,
no distinctions are made among clan members; all are
considered equally descended from a common ancestor.
Moreover, due to the meager physical environment and lack
of land a distinctive class structure is not observable
in the village. Therefore, the people practice exogamy;
however, several cases of exogamous marriage between
different ethnic groups were reported to and observed by
this researcher.
Because of the absence of a caste system (in the
sense of the Indian caste system) and the absence of
different and distinct class, both hypergamy and hypogamy
are absent. Hypergamy is a rule that states that one's
wife's group is of lower status than one's own. Equally,
that one's husband's group is of higher status than one's
own. Hypogamy is a rule that states that one's wife's
group is of higher status than one's own. It is the
opposite of hypergamy. I prefer to label the Almara
villagers' marriage relationships as homogamy. It is the
cultural practice of marrying someone like yourself: from
your own group, class or caste.
I must note that it is not the case in the whole
country. Wherever the class structure is distinctive and
the gap between the poor and the rich is great, the
principle of hypergamy is the rule or at least homogamy
prevails. The question of purity, as it relates to the
caste system in India and other societies, is not relevant
107
in this respect. All Afghans are considered equal as
regards the issues of purity and marriageable pairs.
Considering the entire country, there is one exception
to this rule. In practice the parents do not approve of the
idea of marrying their daughters to poor individuals.
Several reasons were given to me. First, the parents do
not want their daughter to face economic problems after her
marriage. Second, poor people cannot afford the marriage
expenses. Third, hypergamy (from class A to class Band/or
from lower to higher class) indicates mobility from lower
status to higher status on the part of the girl, therefore,
it is favored.
Divorce:
Although Islamic principles and sharia permit
spouses' separation, in practice, expelling a wife from
the family is socially strongly sanctioned against among
the Pashtuns of Afghanistan. In Almara the investigator
was not able to find even a single case of divorce. A
divorced man cannot live in his natal community. Attempting
such conduct will not only damage a husband's and a wife's
status, but will bring shame lor their ancestors and
successors as well as for their whole lineage. In a
society in which more than 90 per cent of the population
are illiterate this rigid social norm concerning divorce
is likely to be functional.
108
In this chapter, I discussed the meaning of marriage
and I gave different definitions to it. Then stages of the
institution followed by the villagers were described.
Further, the concepts of bride wealth and virginity and
their manifest and latent functions were explained.
Finally, I considered the rules of endogamy vs. exogamy
and the hypergamy, hypogamy and homogamy. In the following
chapter in the light of what has been said so far, I
discuss the political organization and political blocs in
Almara.
109
FOOTNOTES FOR CHAPTER IV
111
CHAPTER V
112
definition proves not to be useful for our purpose in this
study. In any case, we do not want to limit our perspective
to one definition in this particular respect. Because the
cultures are so different and the political organizations
are so varied, it is not easy to find such a definition to
include much of the ethnographic data.
Current in political anthropology are three related
emphases: process, decision-making and the universality
of politics (Salzman 1971 :433). It is the purpose of this
chapter to examine how the Almara villagers and their
neighboring communities interact and what are the norms and
rules which sustain social order. In other words what is
the range and scope of these rules and how are they
enforced? Who holds the power and authority in the
communities? Who are allies and who are enemies? There is
not much point in distinguishing too precisely between the
fields of political organization and law, because they are
very interrelated. Therefore, even some issues related to
the anthropology of law will also be discussed in this
chapter.
The centrality of the process in political anthro-
pology is implied by Swartz, Turner and Tuden (1966:7-8)
in their definition of the study of politics as ", ,.the
study of the process involved in determining and imple-
menting public goals and in differential achievement and
use of power by the members of the group concerned with
these goals, and achieving settlements are the prime foci
113
of interest." All these factors can be analytically
organized into "patterned sequences of phases" which
provide diachronic explanations.
Bailey (1969:ix and viii) outlines several universal
political processes: competition over resources, con-
frontation-subversion-encounter, brokerage, collusi8n and
umpiring. In Strategems and Spoils (1969) he draws
examples from the Swat Pashtuns, an Indian village, the
fourth and fifth French Republics, and the British Cabinet.
In a somewhat similar direction, Barth (1966) argues that
social forms or structures can be best explained by the
construction of generative models which specify the
individual decision making and consequent social process
from which the forms and structures emerge. Methodologically,
these studies entailed extended case study analysis. In
any investigation and analysis in this chapter, I pursue
almost a similar path.
Segmentary Opposition:
In order to understand the Pashtuns political
organization we should consider the functioning of their
lineage system. As I pointed out in chapter III, the
system of patrilineality prevails among the Pashtuns. They
practice a lineage system which follows the principle of
segmentary opposition. Therefore, many of the political
and legal affairs of these people are controlled by the
rule of segmental opposition.
114
The principle is a simple one and it is illustrated
by diagram No. 8 below:
A B
nn
1 ..2
,......~
J 4
.--....
1 m n p
a b c de f e h i j k 0
115
of lal, the confrontation could involve segments III and
IIII, and an attack perpetrated by another political
community would unite the entire lineage.
In this system the descent group is segmented
symmetrically in the sense that there is a balancing of
units in each generation. An ancestor without a brother
,
cannot constitute the focus of a lineage segments since
there can be no opposite. According to Fortes "the guiding
ideas in the analysis of African lineage organization have
come mainly from Radcliffe-Brown's formulation (Fortes
1953:25)" of the structural principles found in all kinship
systems. Among these, two principles are outstanding:
Unilineal descent and the principle of equivalence of
siblings. The principle of unilineal descent resolves a
problem of identification through one's parents. In
patrilineal descent sons are precisely identified with
fathers. The principle of equivalance of siblings defines
the bond of merging of the social personalities of siblings.
Weare concerned here with political organization for the
purposes of the maintenance of order and defense rights in
situations of conflict among the Pashtuns. 1
Tensions and minor conflicts among the collaterals in
Almara arise, but not so far as to become difficult for the
relatives to control. (See Footnote 1) Evidence from
Almara and other Pashtun tribes in Afghanistan indicate
that there are many checks and balances to reduce the degree
of conflict intensity among the close relatives. Historical
116
records of the Almara village witnessed many incidents of
endemic warfare between the people of Almara and the
eastern neighboring tribe, Asmayel-khel. The descendents
of Muhammed, named Sayeds, are respected throughout the
Islamic world. The Yahyakhel, one of the five lineages in
the community, was the last lineage to move into th~ area
and they settled between the two hostile groups. My
informants reported that if the Sayeds had not moved into
kooze (low) Almara, the two neighboring political communiti$
could not have lived near each other, and they would have
been attacking one another's territory continually till
present.
Dupree (1973:425) describes the Pashtuns social con-
dition in the historical perspective as follows:
The British in India, happy at creating
a no-man's-land between themselves and
Tsarist ambitions, faced other problems.
The Pashtun tribes, almost genetically
expert at guerrilla warfare after
centuries of resisting all comers and
fighting among themselves when no comers
were available, plagued attempts to
extend Pax Britannica into their mountain
homeland. Manv raids into the Indus
Valley originated outside the range of
effective punitive action •..
Under these conflicting circumstances the likelihood
of fission of the close collaterals and the fusing of these
small units with other similar but unrelated (if related
they are very far collaterals), seems to be hazardous for
the survival of the penple, because they live in one
community and share mountain forests and irrigation system.
117
It is also against a very well known sociological rule.
Coser (1956:94) has said that:
Groups in any sort of war situations are
not tolerant. They cannot afford individual
deviations from the unity of the coordinating
principle beyond a definitely limited degree.
Also, Coser (1956:104); and Levine and Campbell (1972:J2)
maintain that outside conflict increases group cohesion:
Lthe conflicting7 groups may actually
attract enemies~in order to help maintain
and increase group cohesion. Continued
conflict being a condition of survival
for LConflictin~ groups, they must per-
petuatelly provoke it (Coser 1956:104).
Gluckman in his book Custom and Conflict in Africa
(1969) notes that:
men quarrel in terms of certain of their
customary allegiances but are restrained
from violence through other conflicting
allegiances also imposed by custom - those
who are made enemies in one set of relation-
ships, are made allies by other relationships,
and so the social order is reserved through
a series of checks and balances (1969:2-26).
The conflicting relationship between the collaterals
in Almara are minor ones and does not exceed certain
limits. These kinds of conflicts are called kuranei
khafgan (familial conflicts). If a minor problem arises
between collaterals, the elderly men of the two groups
mediate and resolve the conflict just by asking one of the
individuals, very often the younger one, to go to the elder
individual's house and apologize for the misconduct. Based
upon my observations and my lifetime experiences, I believe
that alliances are not sought with small, distant collateral
118
groups against one's close collaterals, and that such
allies support each other against the prospective rivals
of partners, both in the debates of the councils and in
warfare. In addition, neither historical evidence nor
recent incidents of warfare in the area support Barth's
factionalism theory. Several of my informants recollected
their observations as follows:
Feuding~ (dushmani):
119
the area very often go to the Pakistani doctors).
However, the injured man died near the border and the
body was carried back to his home at midnight when nobody
was around. His two brothers secretly went armed to the
murderer's hamlet. The brothers waited in ambush in front of
the man's hamlet until dawn when the man, without any
,
pre-
cautions, came out of his hamlet. After he made his ritual
abolution and before his trip to the mosque, for the dawn
prayer, he was shot to death. The two brothers ran toward
their own community. When the people from the village of
Ismaelkhel heard the gun shots and they received the news of
their relative's death, all men took their rifles, following
the two brothers, and started running toward Almara. The
second deceased was Nayeb-Salar's (son of Barak kharl, a ftmDus
man, who lived between the two communities) servant and having
no information about the death of the man from Almara, he got
very angry and wanted revenge. The experienced elderly peqple
from Almara informed Nayeb-Salar about the death of their son.
Then Nayeb-Salar, as a wise and experienced man, took the holy
Quran on his head signalizing mediation and the pursuit of
peace as a mediator. He visited the people of bothcarununnies
as soon as he could and informed them that revenge was an
equal in kind and asked that both sides while all men were
armed for the warfare, to return to their villages and take
care of the deceased burial rites. Everybody was satisfied
with the decision and the parties involved returned to their
villages and the incident was over.
120
The case proves the opposite of what Barth believes
is prevalent among the Swat Pakhtuns. The collaterals do
not make factions (dala) against their own collaterals but
they join them as members of one dala (bloc) against their
common enemy in times of feuding, revenge and warfare.
According to Gluckman (1956:24) "the feud is ..a
lasting state of hostility." Otterbein (1972:85-89) has
defined feuding as "a type of armed combat within a
political community in which if a homicide occurs, the kin
of the deceased takes revenge by killing the offender or a
close relative of his." I should note that feuding is
present among the people under study. Revenge is sought
through killing the murderer and no.t his close relatives.
Very often the dead man's brothers, sons or his father, if
he is not very old, are responsible for seeking the revenge.
A man might kill his enemy where and when he could - in a
chance encounter, in a meeting deliberately sought or in
a carefully laid ambush. Avengers who were not "strong"
enough to revenge received help from close collaterals. If
the enemy fell to the rifle of a relative or injured by his
sataw (knife), the shot or the injury was always credited
to the avenger, who was expected to assume responsibility
for it. The dead man's close kin accepts the kill as a
revenge in the feud, and either make peace or continue the
feud. When revenge is accomplished and the victim's
relatives do not know about it, the word has to be sent to
the victim's family. The Pashtun customs do not allow the
121
the revenger to rob his victim; he is supposed to murder
him only to defend his honor and fulfill his social and
religious obligations and not to enrich himself. After
the victim's death, the deceased's body must be put in a
place safe from carnivores and climatic factors. The
victim's eyes and mouth should be closed by the mur.aerer
as it is done in normal and natural death. The victim's
property such as his rifle, pistol, knife, watch, money and
other important items should be. kept and returned to the
family of the deceased. The incident must be reported to
the victim's relatives as soon as possible so that the
deceased's body will not be destroyed by climatic factors
or animals.
My field observations suggest a definition of feuding
which is slightly wider in scope yet complementary to that
which Otterbein (1972) has suggested. As case number 1
shows the feud occurs between the political communities
(Almarawal and Ismaelkhel) as well. Several other examples
such as murder of (8) from Mondozai and the killing of (p)
from Zani khel, two neighboring communities to Almara also
supported the existence of feuding between the political
communities.
122
of field, (P) appeared and asked the men to stop the work.
The mazdoran (laborers) stopped plowing and went to their
badar's (client) house and reported the case to him. (S)
was a leader of his tribe, and a powerful man. In the
morning again he asked the laborers to go to the field and
finish the tilling. This time carrying a rifle {S~
12.3
guards sitting with him in the jeep to take retaliatory
action. (PiS) family returned to their abandoned home about
124
upon the aggressor and/or victim's economic situation and
degree of power. If the murderer's family is rich and has
more men, then the avenging family may leave the community.
If the victim's family is wealthy and powerful, the
murderer's family may leave the village. In some cases the
antagonistic parties involved, because of threats qnd/or
inability to take revenge, cannot tolerate to live in the
same community with their rivals where the interaction is
face-to-face. Feuding parties within one political
community often share the same water channel system, common
forest and a common mosque where they pray five times in
24 hours. Therefore, at least, one side is forced to leave
and go where they can make their living within the country
or even sometimes in Pakistan or India.
Feuding by my own definition is present among all
Pashtuns of the area. There are two ways of coping with
this problem: (1) through taking revenge by killing the
offender or, rarely, a close relative of his. This custom
of killing of murderer's relative has been changed
recently. Revenge is sought from the murderer. This is
an effect of Isla.m: the gatel (killer) is responsible for
his own actions. I must note here that a Pashtun will
never murder a woman for revenge because according to the
people (a) she is not strong enough to defend herself:
murdering a "weak" person for the sake of revenge for a
"strong," a man, does not bring credit c '1'or the avenging
group. {b) If she is married, the avenging group gets
125
involved with two different enemy groups, the agnates of
the murdered and her-in-laws. Another way o£ dealing with
feuding is (2) through compensation. When murder occurs,
planned or unplanned, the o£fender group very often in-
dicates their willingness for peace, negotiations and
dispute settlement. They offer the offended group ,a tra-
ditional blood price which amounts to 60,000 Afs., 2 sheep
and 1 unmarried girl.
126
The government received the message and many soldiers
and policemen were sent to the area. They could not stop
the war because the government did not want to get directly
involved. Therefore, the governor of the Province invited
several experienced and learned men from the council of
elders from the capital of the Province to go to the
, battle
field to mediate and stop the warfare. The council members
accepted ~he invitation and suggested to the governor that
in order to make the mediation more effective he should
invite the holy man, Muqtada of Waziristan,to join the
mediators. Muqtada pir (holy man) was invited and after
one day he arrived at the capital of the Province. One
day later the mediators went to the Mangel and Zazis battle-
field. When the two conflicting groups received the
message that the mediator including Muqtada pir had arrived
in their villages, both sides sent their representatives to
the mediators in order to understand what they wanted. The
mediators advised both sides to stop shooting and killing.
Both sides accepted their advice and the war was stopped
and peace was accomplished.
Let us return to the question of factionalism and
political structure. I split the question in two parts:
(1) factions and blocs at the village and tribal level,
and (2) political structure of patrimonial ism and dawrah
systems at the state level.
127
Factionalism and Blocs:
Factionalism and dalabazi (blocs) at lineage and
tribal levels follow the principle of segmentary opposition.
I have to note that many people from Almara or other
Pashtun villages have businesses and even marriage ties
outside their own lineage or tribes or within a dif£erent
ethnic group or province. But when the questions of nomoos
(honor related to the individual, family, lineage or tribe),
ghairat (bravery), sharm (shame) and "Pashto" (the Pashtuns
way of living, their laws and keeping their honor and
dignity) come in, no one can go further than the limits
established by the Pashtuns codes and ideologies. For
instance, a villager cannot sell his land to other than his
own relatives and villagers. A man without the consensus
of other villagers cannot give asylum to an individual who
murdered or abducted a woman from another community. An
individual cannot make any kind of deal with a disrespectful
person such as a ghal (thief), gamarbaz (gambler) zani
(adulterer), loti (homosexual) and gatel (murderer) or
others.
The villagers"' economic, social, political and legal
affairs are controlled by the kalei jirgah (the council of
elders). Members of the council are not elected. Barth
(1959b:9) has said that a jirgah among the Swat Pashtuns
includes all men in the community. A jirgah, and maraka
in Pashtun communities in Afghanistan depending on the
importance of the case may include all men or representatives
128
of each lineage or in some cases representatives from each
family in the community. Often members of the council of
elders are the local politicians and informal judges who
make the judgment about the trouble cases and enforce their
decisions through the Pashtun codes. These individuals
may also serve as mediators and arbitrators within,and
outside the community when they are in need. We will
discuss the mediation and arbitration procedure further in
chapter 7.
The Pashtuns do not take their quarrels, injuries,
murders and other trouble cases outside the village by
bringing suits against one another in the government courts.
Even the trouble cases such as feuding, warfare, conflict
over land, mountain forests, water right, and other trouble
cases between the political communities are mostly resolved
through the jirgah or maraka. In every case all members
of the council have a right to speak in the council meeting.
There were not scheduled meetings of the council. Meetings
are called whenever a conflict, a trouble-case or confront-
ation within the political community or between the
political communities arise.
There is no official messenger to notify members of
the council of scheduled meetings and to be paid for his
service. The members may inform each other in the mosque.
In many cases a young man will be asked by an elderly
member of the council to take the message to the jirgah or
maraka members.
129
Sometimes the village barbers are sent to take the
message and notify the council members about the content,
time and place of the meeting. If the village barber is
utilized as a messenger, in addition to other services
such as hair cutting, he gets paid a portion of each
village household's yields during the harvest time ......
Some of the council members, in addition to mediating
and arbitrating within and between the political communities,
quite often play the middleman role between the villagers
and the government officials. It is here that some of
these smarter middlemen climb the ladder and get into
official politics. Some of them may become officials in
government, and some may run for representative in Wolosi
Jirgah (Lower House) and/or Meshrano Jirgah (Upper House).
1JO
believe that it would be premature to discuss and make a
judgment about the new Republic established by the popularly
supported coup de tat (July 17, 1973) under the leadership
of General Mohammad Daoud, the first elected president of
the country. I leave this assessment and judgment for the
future because change in the social and political structure
of a traditional society under any kind of political regime
requires a sufficient amount of time.
The German sociologist Max Weber in his classification
of the traditional political systems includes two types
which are termed patriarchal and patrimonial (in Bill, 197~.
1~
result the ruler's resolution with the subjects tends to
be filtered through a network of bureaucratic personalities.
Due to this intricate and differentiated administrative
machinery the fear of magical evil becomes milder. In
essence there is not a great difference between these two
systems. Actually the patrimonial type represents~little
1)2
In the patrimonial Persian system the Shah (king - it
was the same with King Zahir of Afghanistan) is located at
the center of the political system. Here he is surrounded
by advisors, ministers, military officers, secretaries and
confidants (see Diagram No.9). The inner circle members
share personal loyalty to the leader. Although these
,
133
o pc.trimonial 1~8uer
• euhorrlina.tf! ll"alil!r
~ local 1~.0~r
A political co~munity
~.
( )
"""-'
ui a.r ra;; ~' 9
1 J':';'
built-in rivalry that makes interpersonal, intergroup,
and interclass relations. For the leader who wants to
"divide and rule" the social system, the Middle East is a
perfect place for it with its unique social structure which
encourages personal rivalry even among siblings. Hammed
Ammar (1966:110) in a study in an Egyptian village .....found
that intense sibling rivalry is considered essential to a
child's growth. It is done in many different ways including
through the naming system. Ammar discovered that in one
Egyptian family, for example, the older brother was called
"Ahmaq" (stupid) while the younger brother was nicknamed
"Musta :d" (clever). The famous Arab proverb serves the
purpose of summarizing the question of rivalry. It says
"I against my brother, my brother and I against my cousin,
my cousin and I against the stranger."
The same pattern prevails at the national level, when
monarchs and rulers play their advisors and subordinates
off against one another. For example, factions, cliques,
ad hoc collectives and blocs of all sorts are the kinds of
group formation that count in Iran and Afghanistan. James
Bill, who is an authority on the Middle East, particularly
on Iran, in his famous article entitled "The Plasticity of
Informal Politics" in the rlliddle East Journal (Vol. 27,
1973) describes this pervasive network of personal cliques
or dawrahs (dawrah is a singular Persian word meaning cycle).
According to Bill (1973):
135
a dawrah 4 is an informal group of
individu~ls who always meet periodically,
usually rotating the meeting place among
the membership. The basic organizing
principle about which individuals cluster
in particular dawrahs may be professional,
familial, religious, recreational,
intellectual, political or economic.
Dawrah membership helps to build and re-
inforce personal ties. These ties com-
prise the backing of the social and
political fabric of Iran fand AfghanistaQ7'
(Bill, 1973:132).
The dawrah system in Iran and Afghanistan and other
Middle Eastern countries, is an overlapping system. In
each one, individuals are in contact with different cliques
of individuals. Communication flows thus from one dawrah
to another with information constantly passing through the
society by the members.
As was mentioned before, rivalry and conflict mark
all levels and systems in Afghan and Iranian societies.
Evidence shows that there are conflicts in the Royal Family
as well as between villagers, tribesmen, servants and
merchants. This tension has been system-preserving as it
acts as an integrating force. The reason for this unusual
function of conflicts has been a shifting and fluctuating
balance .that tilts back and forth making the weaker stronger
and the stronger weaker. Those individuals who are at a
disadvantage view their position as temporary and con-
stantly maneuver to shift the balance in their favor.
Afghan and Iranians distrust the possession of power.
Bill (1973) gives us a historical example, "Once Dr.
Mussadiq grasped the power, he slowly lost the confidence
136
and backing of the people. This analysis keenly recognizes
the fact that the more powerful x becomes, the more power-
ful and numerous become the forces that oppose x" (Bill
1973:143-144). The balance of tension must be maintained.
Historical evidence from Afghanistan also support this
theory. When King Amannulah seized power, he quickly lost
popularity among the people which resulted in his
abdication and exile. Prime Minister Maiwandwal of Afghan-
istan is another example. Dupree has said that:
A distinguished diplomat (ambassador to
Washington and Karachi), administrator
(Minister of Information and Culture in
Dr. M. Yusuf's first cabinet; Prime
Minister for two years), and intellectual
(he had written a masterful analysis of
Afghanistan's ills in Musawat, and proposed
a.socialist program to remedy them) ...•
ihe] also in 1969 had stood for the Wolosi
Jirgah (Lower House), and had been
defeated because of the open involvement
of the government at the Pools. . • . He
had been virtually forced to resign as
prime minister (1976:8).
While it is debatable whether Mussadiq posed a threat
to this balance. it is less a distrust of the possession of
power than a recognition of the necessity to react to its
concentration. Personal survival and system preservation
have long been based upon this dynamically delicate
balance of tension (Bill 1973:143-144),
The shifting and fluctuating of power and position
results in the insecurity of the power holder. Dr. Nasir,
a prominent psychologist who analyzed this tendency in
Iran notes from his study. liMy various occupations have
137
been all bound together like the links of a chain. For
the sake of succeeding in one and to eliminate the
obstacles to my progress, I was compelled to obtain another
position. Again, in order to protect that I.accepted a
third job" (1965:4J in Bill, 197J:148). This tendency
toward insecurity tends to be one of the reasons whjch
force the Iranians or the Afghans to join several dawrahs.
To increase family ties, it contributes to the system
maintenance in many ways. It reduces the degree of tension
between the individuals who are members of the same dawrah.
It also helps one to avoid losing all of his position and
power. It can be concluded that the characteristics of
tension, personalism, informality and insecurity which
have marked power relationships in Afghanistan and Iran are
all interrelated and reinforce and maintain the system of
patrimonialism.
To summarize, in this chapter I discussed the politi-
cal organization and political blocs among the people of
Almara. In the light of data from the village the principle
of segmentary opposition and its function among the people
were described. I also indicated that Barth's factionalism
theory does not hold among the Pashtuns of Afghanistan.
Further, based upon my observations I defined feuding as a
state of recurring hostilities between families or groups
within or between political communities motivated by a
desire to avenge an offense - whether insult, injury,
deprivation or death. I indicated that feuding by my own
1J8
definition is present among the Pashtuns. Warfare also
occurs between political communities and tribes. The
causes of warfare could be listed as invasion of a communit~
139
FOOTNOTES FOR CHAPTER V
140
•.. Pakhtuns hold land as individual property,
but they do not own particular fields, and
their Llan17 tenure is subjected to a system
of periodic reallotment, known as the wesh
(division) system ... Similarly the common
estate of a descent unit is divided into an
absolute number of equal shares. A Pakhtun
through inheritance receives a specified
fraction of the tribal estate in the form
of a specified number of such shares, but no
particular plot. He is alloted fields of ~
irrigated and dry land ... corresponding to the
size of his share. But as no two pieces of
land are equal, the equivalence in value of
each share is assured only through making
this allotment temporary, and periodically
redistributing the estate between the share-
holders. Every fourth, fifth, or tenth year
each man is allotted new fields, so through
a long cycle the holders of each share
exercise rights over all fields an equal
length of time .•• (1959b:10).
According to Barth this pattern of land tenure, with
the exception of river-bank land, where continued reallot-
ment reduces the individual hazards of erosion and under-
cutting by shifting river courses, has been changing in the
area during the last generation. He believes that the
procedure for redistribution follows the segmentary charter
of the tribal genealogy within tribal units. Barth has
said that:
As these reallotments take place every ten
years, the borders of each sub-area of the
joint estate are well known to all, their
equivalence in value has been established,
and no great opposition of interests arises
between the major descent segments in the
reallotment system. The real problems arise
on the lower levels of reallotment, where
individuals have their eyes on particular
fields, and especially where deaths and trans-
fers change the distribution of shares from
one time of allotment to the next ... Tensions
and conflicts do arise during the division of
141
their joint estate, since the fields granted
to one segment are in fact within practical
reach of members of the other segment; they
are in order of one or two miles away, and
could be worked or controlled by them. But
the most intense conflicts develop in the
last stage of allotment, when the /men of
one lineage (khel)/ are competing for the
actual, individual fields. There is no tra-
ditional subdivision of the village lands
into the! particular configuration of shares__
represented at that particular time; the men
must meet in a council of their small segment
and devise a pattern of allotment through
negotiation and compromise or force. This is
a type of issue uniquely suited to generate
intense factionalism between collaterals;
there is an overriding opposition of interests
between such groups competing for slightly
better fields. Thus at every periodic re-
allotment, the opposition of close agnatic
collaterals is dramatized and made acute, while
the opposition between segments of higher
levels is routinized and involves no particular
conflicts (1959b:11).
In order to prove his theory, Barth has observed that:
This persisting opposition between col-
laterals agnates prevents their interests
from fusing even vis-a-vis outsiders. A
Pakhtun's political activities are
directed at gaining an advantage over his
agnatic rivals, as only through their
defeat can he achieve his own aggrandize-
ment. He is not limited, as in many
lineage systems, to them as his potential
supporters - his clients constitute the
main body of his supporters. Any loss by
his collaterals means a gain for him - he
wrests control of the councils from him,
he encroaches on their field, and he
inherits their shares in land if they are
exterminated. His political strength
vis-a-vis his paternal cousins he assures
by political alliances... Alliances
!Qal~ are sought with small, distant
collateral groups against one's close col-
laterals, while the latter reciprocate by
allying themselves with the rivals of
one's allies. Such alliances involve
mutual support against the respective
142
rivals of the partners, both in the
debates of the councils, and in the
case of warfare (1959b:11-12).
Barth constructs his factionalism theory on the basis
of the reallotment of the fields. My research shows that
Barth's theory does not hold among the people of Almara,
because the Almarawals do not leave their land and ~hey do
not have the custom of the reallotment of their fields.
14)
CHAPTER VI
,
ISLAM, SHARIA AND CRIMINAL LAW
Islam:
According to the World Muslim Congress (1962), Islam
has approximately 650 million followers. To the Muslim,
only Allah, t'the God," is divine. Muslims attribute no
divinity to Muhammad; he is simply a prophet. Like all
organized religions Islam has a codified system of ritual
(commonly called the Five Pillars of Islam) for initiation
and permanent identification. Muhammad, the Prophet,
(Shahab: 1966:1) said that:
Boni il Islamo alIa khamsa. Shahhadaten
anna la ilaha ilIa llahu, wa anna
Muhammadan rasulu-llah. Wa eqama salate.
Wa ieta azzakate. Wa hajj. Wa sawma
ramadanen.
144
Translation: Islam is founded on five principles:
(1) given witness that there is no God but Allah and
Muhammad is the messenger of Allah; (2) salat (prayer);
() zakat (almsgiving); (4)hajj (pilgrimage); and (5)
sawm (fasting).l Regarding the importance of these five
principles; .§§!!!!! (fasting) comes fourth and hajj is- the
fifth in order. Here I followed the order of the above
mentioned hadith, but many jurisprudence books put hajj
last.
A devout Almara villager after wodhoh (ritual
ablutions) prays, facing Mecca, five times each day. The
daily occassi<1Yls for prayer are gayiz (dawn), maspasheen 2
(early afternoon) till mid-afternoon, mazdiger (dusk),
masham (early evening) and makhustan) (at night). In
addition, the offering of Friday prayer is also fard
(essential duties) for each MUGlim in nearby larger mosque
in the village or in the nearby town or city. Two other
prayers such as the prayer of Id-il-Ramadan, said at the
end of the month of Ramadan (fasting), and the prayer of
Id-il-Uduha, said on the tenth of the month of Dhul Hijja
(the ninth and the twelfth month in the Muslim lunar
calendar respectively), are also wajib (essential duties)
for all Muslims in the tovm or city mosques. Al thcugh not
forbidden by Islam, women do not pray with men in the
mosque because the system of perdah 4 (veil) is still
prevalent in the area; since women are segregated and thus
145
pray at home, the mosque remains a place for men to pray.
Zakat (almsgiving) is considered a purifying act.
All Muslims should annually give a certain percentage of
his/her wealth (money, crops, animals) to the neighbors
and the poor directly. Every Muslim is required to pay
4 percent of his/her money, 10 percent of his/her '
agricultural yields and 2 1/2 percent of his/her animals
annually to the ·poor. In order to avoid humiliation and
embarrassment zakat is very often paid directly to
whomever may deserve it but not in the presence of another
individual. ?a~at has three important functions: (1) to
avoid accumulation of wealth and to see that it is dis-
tributed among all peoples; (2) to help the poor; ()) to
enrich the Bayt at-Mal (State Treasury). The custom of
zakat also partly justifies the lack of taxation for the
purpose of social welfare in Afghanistan and in certain
other Muslim nations.
The ritual fasting (rujah, Pashto) is the fourth
essential duty in Islam. It occurs for one lunar month
in the ninth month of the Muslim calendar. The fasting
individual is obliged to avoid eating, drinking, smoking
and having sexual relations from sunrise (theoretically
when white thread can be distinguished from black thread)
to sundown (when the white and black threads are indis-
tinguishable). Fasting (rojah or rozha) is a hard task to
be fulfilled by the devout especially when it falls in
summer when the days become longer and the temperature
146
rises. It creates greater hardships for the peasants who
are working in their £ields under the sun.
Pregnant and suckling mothers, travelers, soldiers in
the battle field, sick individuals, women during their
menstruation period and the ruler are exempt from the fast.
According to the Islam however, all must make up lost days
at other times of the year.
Although fasting creates great hardships for the
devout ~~ ~upports very valuable humanistic, democratic,
and beneficiary health philosophies: (1) it is a test of
self-control; (2) it creates an awareness about the poor
and the pain of their hunger; (3) it is applied as a rule
to every Muslim except for those exempt; (4) it is
healthy: people who gain weight know its ef£ects best.
All Muslims who can meet their family's needs for at
least one year and can afford the expenses of the journey
are required to perform the obligatory hajj (pilgrimage)
to the sanctuary of Allah in the city of Mecca in Saudi
Arabia. In 1970, 1,500 pilgrims (hajji, singular) made the
trip in buses, and 5,000 went by air.
The major festival during the Hajj is the ritual
slaying of sheep, goats and cows on the tenth day of Dhul
Hijah, Id al-kabir or Id al Udoha, Arabic or Loy Akter in
Pashto. Every hajji in Mecca is supposed to slaughter a
sheep or a goat alone or share a cow or an ox with six
other individuals. Muslims at home are also obligated to
make gurbani (animal sacrifice) if they are not in debt to
147
others and they have a certain amount of wealth which
could meet the family needs for at least one year. One
sheep or one goat is considered to be sufficient for
meeting one individual's requirement and a cow or an ox
could meet seven persons' religious obligations. The
slaughtered animals should be split in three equal ~arts:
148
accumulation of wealth. A hajji not only pays for his
travel, he is supposed to buy many gifts for his family,
relatives, and friends; upon his arrival home he distributes
the gifts. Moreover, at his arrival at home all his
relatives and friends come to his house for greeting and
he is expected to serve good food to his guests. (~)
149
as a result has only served to exacerbate the conditions
the hajj was intended to alleviate.
150
the usages, customs, and norms of the people, opinions and
experiences of the learned men and scholars, plus the
historical background of those societies. A part of these
laws are the residues of the divine legal systems, which,
in the long run, people had gotten accustomed to. Without
questioning the origin of these laws, they had beco~e an
inseparable part of their lives.
The second type of laws are characterized as divine
laws. These laws comprise a system of "oughts," "ought-
nots," guidelines, exhortations and rules that are laid
down by God and are sent to societies and nations through
a messenger who is one of the people. Based upon the
themes of these divine laws the Prophet invites the people
to abide by God's rules promising the fruits of their
deeds: paradise. The Prophet also discourages his
followers from unlawful acts which lead to Hell. According
to Atooh (1971:2) the divine law in Islam is the Islamic
Sharia.
Sharia:
,
.{ ,. .
Sharla or Shar lS an Arablc word
(
also very commonly
used in Pashto and Persian) which means literally the
right "path" or "road" and hence the law of Islam leading
Muslims to heaven (Levy 1971:150), According to Serat
(1971:3) all imperatives and rules determined by God and
revealed to Mohammed and taught to Muslims through the
Quran or Sunna are called sharii. To many Muslim scholars,
151
the shari~ is not simply a body of law, but also includes
faith, ethics and action. The sharii consists of three
sets of imperatives and rules:
1. Tenet imperatives: Those rules related to the
nature and attributes of the God: belief in God, his
messengers (Prophets), angels, the divine books (TQrah,
Psalms, Bible and Quran) and Resurrection.
2. Ethical imperatives: Maxims and virtues by which
human conduct should be characterized such as truth,
honesty, trusteeship, loyalty to promise, sacrifice,
generosity, bravery, avoidence of meanness, rascality,
mischievousness' such as telling lies, breaking promises,
timidity, gossip and other forms of conduct harmful to
the ethics of individuals and society.
3. Active imperatives: Imperatives related to the
believers' conduct regarding, for example, worship, trading,
crime, individual affairs and international relationships
among Muslim nations during peace and war time, and other
rules treated by figh (jurisprudence).
In this way shari~ is not only a body of law, but
also includes belief and action. As Yusuf (1976:33) points
out "It /Sharia'/ is a total way of life, a moral code and
a body of law all lumped together. It concerns itself
with every Rspect bf the life of the believer •.. ," Fazlur
Rahman (1966:1)6-37) observes that "The shari! itself is
defined as comprising both the acts of the heart as well
152
as overt acts. It is indeed the assembly of Divine impera-
tives to man, imperatives which are frankly admitted to be
primarily of a moral character. "The sharict is thus not
an actual formal code of particular and specific enactments
but is conterminous with the • good I."
Based upon what has been said so far about shari~ and
figh (jurisprudence), we have learned that the domain of
sharii is wider than that of fiqh. However, scholars in many
Islamic nations traditionally refer to sharii as fiqh.
Logically this type of useage is considered correct and is
commonly used. Indeed it is a reference to a whole by
one of its parts.
153
as sacrifice of animals by the individuals who can afford
it during the Id-il-Uduha and prayer of the Id-il-Ramadan
and Id-il-Uduha. Fard occurs more frequently than Wajib.
Fard is usually obligatory to every believer but Wajib in
many occasions is related to the economic status of the
individual.
3. Sunna (recommended): rules recommended to be
fulfilled. Failure to accomplish them is considered sin.
Praying together with other villagers in the mosque while
the imam conducts the prayer and the others follow, is an
example.
4. Mustaheb (optional): accomplishment of this rule
brings credit to the actor and the act is desired. Non-
accomplishment is not considered to be a sin. The use of
tasbeh (rosary) very commonly used in the Middle East, for
the purpose of prayer, is an example.
5. Mubah (permitted): an act which is permitted: it
is an indifferent act such as sleeping, eating and walking.
6. Makruh (disapproved): acts which are disapproved
of and considered reprehensible: such as eating of the
horse meat because of the horse's importance in war.
7. Haram (forbidden): those acts which are prohibited
by shari~ (Islamic law) such as theft and adultery.
Sorn o ~uthoriiies such as Ibn Khaldun (Levy 1971:150)
and Khaddury and Liebesny (1955:108) do not differentiate
between fard and wajib and also between sunna and mustaheb
and consequently provide us with a list of five items.
154
·
The knowledge of sharia and fiQh is acquired from
Quran, the Sunna and such arguments as the legists (those
skilled in law) may adduce for the necessary comprehension
of the laws contained in them. It is the body of rules
derived by these legal arguments that is called fiqh.
Quran:
The QUran is the direct injunction and kalam aI-Allah
(Words of God). It is the most consummate and final
revelation of God to man. The Quran itself contains the
objectivity and the verbal character of the Revelation
155
brought down to Mohammed by Gabriel, the Trusted Spirit
(Fazlur Rahman, 1966:26). According to the predominant
view in Islam the book was regarded by the Prophet as
containing a series of revelations made to him at irregular
intervals as necessity demanded and as dictated from an
original code, Umm al-Kitab (the Mother of the book(s),
which is preserved in Heaven. ) (Levy 1971:150)
The Book contains a series of 114 suras, chapters,
very unequal in length. It was verbally revealed and
delivered to Mohammed at uneven intervals and under specific
circumstances in Mecca and" Medina. According to Fazlur Rahman
(1966:25), "the early Meccan SUras are among the shortest;
as time goes on, they become longer. The Ayat (verses)
in the early Suras are charged with an extraordinarily deep
and powerful psychological moment; they have the character
of brief but violent volcanic eruptions."
Levy (1971:53) tells us that "the early Suras--those
delivered at Mecca--and also the earlier Medina chapters,
are filled with impassioned harangues to encourage belief,
with fiery denunciations of enemies, and with vivid
descriptions of Hell, Heaven and the judgement of the Last
Day (Yawm al Qayama) to point out Mohammed's remarks."
Most of the Ayat (verses) revealed to Mohammed in
Mecca did not include fighi (jurisprudencial) rules but very
often were heavily loaded with rules and discussions of
beliefs and tenet. The Meccese verses were invitations to
Islam, make the Muslims to promote belief in God and fulfill
156
what was obligatory and recommended and avoid what was
reprehensible and forbidden by Islam. Therefore, the
verses are short, concise, meaningful and charged with
powerfulness and psychological elements such as fear and
promises.
Fazlur Rahman (1966:25) and Musa (1973:3) both believe
that the Medinese verses became longer, more fluent and
easy stylistically. This is certainly not to say that
either the voice had been stilled or even that its intensive
quality had changed. I believe it was a rational and
logical policy. As Muhammad emigrated 7 from Mecca to
Medina because of pressure from his enemies he and his
companions established the Islamic nascent community-state
in the city of Medina. As a result of it the legal content
increases for the detailed organization and direction of the
new community-state. Moreover, there was an obvious need
for laws and regulations in order to control individual as
well as national relations. This change did not happen at
once. It was a gradual process so that the new believers
could adjust to their new tenet gradually and discard their
previous traditions and beliefs.
Sunna:
All these rules came to Muhammad through revelation
in short and abstract statements. Therefore, there was
a need for the interpretation of the Kalam aI-Allah (words
of God) and Sunna met the need.
157
Sunna includes Muhammad's gawli (spoken), fJli
(actional), taqriri (agreemental) behaviors. According to
Fazlur Rahman (1966:45) It ••• Sunna literally means the
'trodden path and /the wor~l was used by the pre-Islamic
Arabs to denote the model behavior established by the
forefathers of their tribe. The concept in this context
,
has, therefore, two constituents, (a) an (alleged)
historical fact of conduct and (b) its normativeness for
the succeeding generations. It
In the QUran the word
is also applied in the same sense. The Sunna which embodies
the personal actions, sayings, agreements with others and
facts of life of the Prophet are contained in hadiths
(tradition from the Prophet). The hadith in essence, is the
report of the Prophet's Sunna or courses of conduct, doings
and sayings (Subki 1850:11:83).
The words, action, and sayings do not need illustration.
The word tagriri refers to a situation in which in the
presence of Muhammad an individual acted or said something
and the Prophet kept quiet (indicating agreement), or
the Prophet considered it beneficial, or in which he was
told about a deed done by someone and did not reject it.
The difference bet#een the hadith and the Sunna is that
whereas the former is a mere report and something
theoretical the latter is a report with a normative quality
and thus a practical principle for the Muslim.
Each hadith consists first, of the isnad (the chain
of authorities who have transmitted the report) and second,
158
the matn (the text or substance of the report). A
typical chain of transmitters runs like this: A (the
last narrator) says he heard it from B on the authority
of C who said this on the authority of D that the Prophet
of God said . . . etc. (Dupree 1973:100; and Fazlur Rahman
1966:57-63) .
The most reliable ahadith (plural of hadith) comes
from the ashab companions of Muhammad. A total of 144,000
ashab are estimated by Hughes (Hughes 1885:29). Those
hadiths recorded immediately after the rahlat (death) of
Muhammad are the most reliable ones particularly if they
are written by the first grade companions. A great
number of Muslims recognize a certain number of individuals
as having been in a position to report the Sunna of the
messenger Muhammad. The most famous of these persons are
Abdullah ibn Abas, the Prophet's uncle and one of his
"companions," ibn Umer (Son of the second Caliph, Umer),
Aisha, Muhammed's widow and daughter of Abu Bakr (Muhammad's
successor), and Abu Hurayra, a friend of the Prophet's.
Islam was divided into two major sects shortly after
the death of the Prophet Muhammad. The chief reason for
this split was political rather than religious. As
Dupree (1973:101) has described this development:
Islam . . . is divided into two major
sects, born primarily because of
disputes over political succession,
rather than religious differences.
The problem of succession to leader-
ship of the Muslim community arose after
the death of Prophet Muhammad in 632.
159
One group thought the leader
(Khalifa or Caliph) should be
elected from the Quraish tribe of
the Prophet; another thought Ali
should succeed his father-in-law
(Mohammad left no male heirs) . . .
Very roughly speaking the Muslims who accept the
Surma as transmitted by those mentioned above are called
Sunni (Sunnites) while those who do not are the shi1
(Shiites). According to the Shiites the community of
Muslims has no power to elect its head, who is an imam
always divinely appointed from descendents of Muhammad's
immediate kin. They believed Ali was alone entitled to
succeed him; and the three Chaliphs as well as all other
&
Chaliphs were usurpers and impostors. Shiis also believe
that since ibn Abbas, Aisha, Ibu Haryra and others con-
sistently refused to report those hadiths which would
prove Ali to have been appointed to the leadership of
Islam by the Prophet himself, the Shiites rejected the
whole body of hadiths originating from these sources. They
accepted only the ahadith for which Ali himself is the
authority and he reported them. Therefore, the Sunnite
hadith is not one of the roots of fiqh recognized by the
Shiites.
Where the Quran was not clear on a particular
question resort was very often made to the Sunna.
Consequently, the Sunna has gradually acquired an
authority only slightly less than that of the Quran and
in this way has become the second major source of Islamic law.
160
Qiyas (Analogical Reasoning):
161
common essential feature called the reason
(i'ila). . .
The following example throws more light on the
principle of giyas (analogy). Quran and Sunna both for-
bade drinking of all kinds of intoxicating beverages.
Taking of certain amounts of alcohol results in intoxi-
cation, therefore, its drinking is haram (forbidderi1 by
Islamic jurists.
Ijmi (Consensus):
Ijm~ literally means gathering and consensus (Haim
1963:19). Islamic jurists define the term as the consensus
of all contemporary mujtahadin (pious religious jurists)
over a particular point of law. Some of the Islamic
jurists are of the opinion that the gathering of all Muslim
fogaha (jurists) was and is a very difficult task.
Because, first, they are scattered allover the Islamic
world and therefore, their recognition is not an easy job.
Second, bringing all these scholars and jurists together
in one spot and to ascertain their opinions is very
difficult work particularly in the past when the systems
of transportation and communication were not as practical
as they are today.
However, too much reliance on legal and dogmatic
opinion on details resulted, to a great degree, in a
difference between legal scholars themselves and between
scholars and their disciples. For instance, Abu Hanifa's8
162
on the path of ray (opinion), and qiyas (analogy)
(Fazlur Rahman, 1966:80-84; Levy, 1971:166-69: and
Yusuf, 1976:35). Therefore, the principle known as ijm1,
which defines the force and validity of any law obtained
by giyas, was adopted as the fourth principal root of
Islamic law, after the Quran, Sunna and qiyas. ImRerative
text of Quran, and hadith and terse or succinct of ijm~
is called nass (text). A nass is different from the
principle of giyas. For example, it is said that usage
can overcome on qiyas (analogy) but it cannot dominate
ijml (consensus). Apparently the principle of qayas
(analogy) is older than ijmi (concensus) in its history
but its validity is less.
163
wisdom of the mufti 9 (judge or jurist) reasonable and
acceptable by Islam. The verdict in a specific case
might be a new one and a deviation from the general rule.
There are many examples of the application of this rule
in the figh (jurisprudence) books. For instance, based
upon the principle of qiyas (analogy) purchase of an
.... item
is not permitted in its absence. Because, first, whether
or not the item could be available in the future is a
question of probability. Second, there is a fear of
conflict over the quality of the item whenever it becomes
available. Based upon the principle of Istihsan (regarding
as better) Islamic shari' permits the purchase of a good
even if it is not present. The follo~'lers of imam
Abu Hanifa apply this principle more often than the
followers of any other of the three orthodox schools
of Islamic law.
164
In the view of the prominent jurists Islamic
shari~ should not limit itself only with what nass rules,
because people and their culture evolve and change.
Therefore, Islamic shari~ has to be adjusted with new
situations and new developments, otherwise it will not be
able to cope with new problems and the society may ~ose.
165
J. The jurists allowed the justice rulers to
collect some tax from the rich so that the ammunition
could be bought and the military systems could be improved.
4. Although Islam rules the private business
industry through halal (lawful) activity and means for
the sake of the well-being of the majority of the p'~ople,
166
another not only on the principles but even on major
details (Fazlur Rahman, 1966:92).
There are four major schools which are still
inexistence, all named after their founders:
Abu Hanifa, Malik ibn Anas, Muhammad ibn Idris al
Shafii and Ahmad ibn Hambal. These rites cover the_Sunni
world and to one or another of them every Sunni belongs.
In Iraq, the rite centered around Abu Hanifa
(d. 150) (767) and was called madhhab al-Hanafi (Hanaf
School). The school is the earliest of all four major
madhhabs. lmam Abu Hanifa's disciples, Abu Yusuf (d. 188)
(971) and Muhammad al-Shaybani (d. 189) (805) in
particular, elaborated on and systematized the school of
thought. This legal practice was favored by the Abbasid's
empire whose capital was Baghdad. The adherents of the
Hanafi School live predominantly in Afghanistan, India,
Iran,ll Pakistan and Turkey. Numerically, about half of
the sunnite sect of the Muslim population adhere to the
Hanafi rite. The major characteristic of the school was
the exercise of ray (free opinion).
Malik ibn Anas founded the Maliki madhhab (d. 179)
(795) which originated in Medina. He was a native of
the city. The school closely follows the Hanafi rite in
terms of historical sequence. Malikite madhab overcame
the Syrian school of al-Awazi (d. 157) (779), whose
reliance on the "living tradition" was greater than on
legal hadith in contrast to Sufyan al-Thawri. Imam Malik
167
placed his reliance on the "living tradition" of Medina
but was equally anxious to vindicate this tradition
through hadith. He was a systematic ~igih (jurist).
Malik collected a body of legal traditions and, testing
them in the light of the living practice of Medina,
constructed a system of juridical opinions into a _~
168
opinions and decisions which those competent to do so
in Islam had formulated and agreed upon. To sum them up,
there Were three roots of jurisprudence of Shafiis,
the Quran, the Sunna and the ijmi (consensus). In
Imam Shafii's view they were not sUfficient for all the
requirements of the law, and he established a fourth root
in qiyas (analogy), which he used when the other sources
failed. He frowned upon the unrestricted liberty of ray
(free opinion) and its offshoot Istihsan (regarding as
better) (Levy 1971:177-179). The followers of the Shafite
rite today are found chiefly in Cairo, Lower Egypt, and
parts of Yemen and Aden.
A famous doctor and arch-traditionalist, Ahmad ibn
Hambal (d. 241) (1855), a pupil of Imam Shafii, founded
a new school called madhhab al-Hanbali (hambalite Rite).
He carried the logic of al-Shafii's insistence on the
hadith in law to extremes and eventually became one of
the bitterest critics of his ustaz (teacher), Imam al-Shafii,
and his madhhab (rite). Ibn Hanbal accepted the Rationalist
interpretation of the Quran and hadith (tradition) and
he with those of like mind refused to recognize the
"unlawful" bide! (innovation) of the ijmi (consensus).
Ibn Hanbal was not primarily concerned with juris-
prudence and its relation to sources of hadith. He was
mainly interested in juridical aspects of jurisprudence.
His major work, The Musnad, collected a body of traditions.
Therefore, he is considered a traditionalist. On the
169
whole, the Hambali school is the most reactionary of the
three schools described thus far. At present the
Hanbalite rite is predominant mainly in Saudi Arabia, and
in parts of Muslim population of India and Pakistan.
The above four madhhabs (schools) appear to have
evolved as a result of social, economic and political
changes among the Muslim nations. When Islam expanded,
many different problems arose. In order to accommodate
170
marriage, homicide, ritual of fasting, ritual ablution,
slavery, food tabu (haram) and so on (Levy, 1971:
176-186; Fazlur Rahman, 1966:92-95; and Khaddri and
Liebesny, 1952:97-140).
Criminal Law:
In Islamic law the term jurm and janavat are very
often used synonymously and to mean "crime" or "felony."
In Islamic shari~ crimes are those actions, the fulfill-
ment of which are forbidden or those acts whose discharge
is prohibited by Allah and are liable to hudud (penalties
specified by the Sharii) or tazirat (discretionary
penalties) (Awdah, 1969:56). According to the Egyptian
Criminal Law, the concept of crime is different from
what is considered a crime by the Islamic sharia.
Egyptian Criminal Law considers that type of action as a
crime whose penalty is execution, temporary or lifetime
imprisonment with servitude or stoning. If the penalty
for an action is more than one week imprisonment or a
fine of 100 Egyptian Pounds ($2 =1 Egyptian Pound) the
act is called jonha (torts). The act for which there is
a penalty less than that is named mukhalafat (oppositions).
Islamic sharia considers all of them as crimes.
To take the severity of the penalty into account
the Islamic sharii divided the punishment for the jurms
(crimes) into three categories:
171
A. Hudud: divine rights and rules specifying penalties
for certain crimes determined by a nasus (texts).
Neither the qadi (judge) nor the ruler has the right to
increase or decrease the amount of penalty nor can the
offender be forgiven by an individual or society. In
Islamic law these penalties are thought to be hggg .ulla
(divine right) the establishment of which is believed to
be beneficial for the common salah (good). Their aim is
to bring about peace in the society and protect it from
corruption, deterioration, and defect. The number of
hudud (Arabic, pl. of hud) is seven:
1. Hudul Zana: specified penalty for adultery.
The Quran says:
"And c orne not near to adultery. It is
an a bomina tion and evil way" (Pickthall,
1957:284). Also Quran reads, "Scourge
adulterer and adulteress with one hundred
stripes"12 (Quran, Surat Nur, Aya 2).
Prophet Muhammad has said that "in case of adultery (g!1§:J
for a non-married (ghair,muhsan) man and woman, there
are 100 jeld (stripes) and one year exile" (in Awdah,
1969:470). The exile should be within the Islamic
world. Another hadith also reads that "the penalty for
an adulterer and an adulteress is 100 strokes and
stoning t 0 death." The interpreters of the law divide
offenders into two classes: muhsan (married) and ghairt
muhsan (non-married). The penalty for the former category
is 100 strokes and one year in exile. The penalty for
the latter category is stoning to death.
172
2. Hudul Qazaf (accusation): the text of Quran
reads "those who cast imputations on [Of adultery on the
chaste, i.e., free, of full age and sound ~ind, pro-
fessinglslam and abstaining from fornication7 on
women and then do not bring four witnesses scourge them
with 80 strokes and never accept their witness, they are
lewd people (Suratu Nur, aya 4). According to this aya
(verse), gazaf (accusation) is being considered a crime,
the primary penalty 80 strokes and the secondary penalty
for it is deprivation from acceptance of his witness.
3. Hudul Surb (penalty for drinking intoxicating
beverages: the text of the Quran reads: "drinking
alcoholic beverages is an evil act I therefore, avoid it"
(Quran, Suratu Maa, aya 9). A hadith also reads:
"drinking any of the intoxicating beverages is haram
(prohibited)" (Awdah, 1969:97). The penalty for consum-
ing intoxicating drinks is not precisely determined by a
nass (verse of Quran or hadith). During the reign of Orner,
the second Caliph, based upon the Companion ijma'
(consensus) and the principle of ~ (analogy) to the
hud (penalty) gazaf the rule was established that the
drinker has to be penalized by scourging him (her)
with 80 ,jelds (strokes). The basis of this gayas, I
believe is laid on the assumption that when an individual
becomes drunk he may say obscene things and falsely
accuse people of improper acts.
173
4. Hudul Serqa (specific penalty for theft):
the Quran contains provision for the punishment of theft--
secretly taking the possessions of another. The code
specifies harsh punishments for theft, usually mutilations
such as amputation of a hand for the first crime and
a foot for the second. The text reads, "amputate man
and woman thieves' hands" (Quran, Surat ah Maeda, aya 38).
It is believed that the hand must be cut from the wrist
and the alternate foot from the ankle.
5. Hudul Haraba (penalty for highway robbery):
Allah tells us that "without any doubt the penalty for
those individuals who, accuse the lovers and believers
of Allah and Prophet Muhammad, and create corruptions
on the earth, is death, hanging and amputation of right
hand and left foot and exile to a remote place"
(Quran Suratu Maada, aya 33). Highway r.obbery is
considered unlawful in Islam and the penalty for it is
death, hanging, amputation or exile.
6. Huda Rada (penalty for apostasy): the text
read: "those individuals among you who leave their
faith L1s1a~ and they die while they are still
unfaithful to Islam, their deeds are worthless in the
world and in the Future Life" (Quran Sura Baqer §:.Y.'! 217).
Hadith reads: "mu!"dering a Muslim is unlawful except for
(a) the adulterous matron (non-virgin), (b) murderer,
and (c) those who have withdrawn from their faith and
have been separated from the Muslim community. Another
174
hadith also reads: "kill the individual who leaves his
faith" (Atooh, 1969:98).
7. Hudu Baghya (specified penalty for revolt):
revolt is last of the seven crimes. The penalty for
hudu baghya has been specified by aya (verse of Quran)
and the hadith. The Quran reads: "if members of two
Muslim tribes fight against each other and kill each other,
mediate between them and resolve the dispute. If anyone
of them does not accept the resolution and still offends
the other side, fight against that group till they accept
the settlement and obey Allah's impera ti ves" (Sura
Hajarat, aya 9). Muhammad says that: "anyone who brings
about separation in the Islamic community; cut them with
sword Lkill theITIl whoever they are" (in Awda, 1969: 99).
B. Qasas (inflecting an equitable death or injury)
and diva (blood-money): the law of the gasas or talio
(equitable death or equitable injury) was applied equally
for mutilations as for murder. The Quran reads: "it
was obligatory . . . to take a life for a life, an eye
for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a
tooth for a tooth and also to inflict an equivalent
amount of injury to the offender. If the outlaw is
forgiven by the plaintiff or the slain's wali (guardian)
the culprit is free" (Suratu Maada, aya 45). Also, Allah
says: "if an individual offended you, offend him
equally, if someone harms you give him equal injury."
175
The laws of qasas (equitable death or injury)
and diva (blood price) are different from those of hudud
(specified penalties) in that they are considered as
the individuals' rights and not divine right. According
to Islamic law an individual's right can be forgiven
by himself or can be paid for in installments if the
offended wishes. Pre-meditated murder and/or injury
comes under the law of qasas or talio on the basis of
which the murder's wali (guardian) can take the murderer's
life or else, they can ask for the diva (blood price)
which is 100 camels. An injured individual also has the
right to exact the equitable injury to the offender or
ask for diva (compensation) for the injury.
C. Tizir (discretionary penalty):is the punishment for
those types of crimes for which the Islamic shri~ has
t:
not specified hudud for. Tazir comprises the various
kinds of admonitions by which the gadhi (judge)
reprimands the offender. Its meaning has been broadened
to include the right of the judge to impose whatever
penalty he deems appropriate, provided that it does not
exceed the legal limit. The severity of this punishment
varies according to age, sex, and social standing of the
criminal and the seriousness of the offense. Under the
category of t~zir, the jurists have included various
punishments, such as warning, imprisonment, flogging and
even fines were imposed under this heading.
176
General practice has recognized the imposition of
punishments of the tdzir category on persons who neglect
religious obligations (such as prayer, fasting, zakat
(almsgiving), stealing less than 10 dinar (1 dinar = $2.50),
attempted theft, intercourse with one's own wife while she
is menstruating, zahar1J (a special type of divorce),
, fraud
in weights and measures, taking false oath, eating pro-
hibited food such as pork and blood and others.
In this secticn we have dealt with different types
of penalties based upon the Islamic shari~ and they are
categorized as follows~
1. Physical penaltibs
a. punishment by death i.e., hanging, beheading,
stoning, slaughtering, rifle squad, blowing
up with cannon
b. amputation of hand and foot
c. flogging (geld)
2. Restrictions of freedom, i.e., imprisonment or
exile.
J. Monetary fines.
It should be noted that many of the above mentioned
physical penalties are not applied in the Islam world any
more except for the Saudi Arabia.
I believe, therefore, one can generalize that in
essence Islam has five major and very important principal
objectives:
177
1. to ensure (hafz) order in human organization
2. to ensure individual and group property
J. to ensure individual and group life
4. to ensure human reason and wisdom
5. to ensure the propagation of mankind.
In the next section I will discuss the punish~ent
178
FOOTNOTES FOR CHAPTER VI
179
lOOmer was the second ckali£a, very powerful
politically and with a vast knowledge. Based upon some of
his argrument, many suras were revealed to Muhammad (
supporting his points and his ideas. Muhammad never roju
(asked) God to help him in converting non-Muslims to Islam
but he requested help in the case o£ Orner before he became
a Muslim.
1&>
CHAPTER VII
181
drives; rules which protect the rights of one citizen
against the offense of the other; rules which pertain to
sex, property and safety." (Malinowski in Redfield, 1967:J),
These rules are found everywhere and in this sense law
exists even among the most primitive society. Malinowski
notes that primitive people, like other people, ar~ kept
from doing what their neighbors do not want them to do
chiefly not because of courts and policemen, but for many
other personal and social reasons. These personal and
social reasons are norms of conduct and ways of social
control.
A third view, taking a middle road, stands by itself
but also overlaps with the others and is the widest of all
(1967:4). According to Sally Falk Moor (1969:25J) there
are essentially three different types of classification of
legal systems: (1) a dichotomy founded on the basic
differences in social organization between technologically
simple and technologically advanced societies; (2) an
evolutionary scheme focusing on legal systems developing
from non-centralized to centralized political systems; (J)
a type which contrasts dispute resolution by force or bargmn
between the parties and arbitration of a third party.
The first type is called the Maine-Durkheim-Gluckman
tradition. This type classifies societies into categories
and looks for the development of law among them. Maine
divided societies based on kinship and territory. Durkheim
recognized societies based upon mechanical or organic
182
solidarity. Gluckman (1955b, 1965c) distinguished a
division between tribal societies and complex societies.
Gluckman argued that tribal and differentiated societies
are different from each other in legal procedures as well
as in basic legal concepts.
The second kind of classification is exemplified by
Diamond (1965) and Hoebel (1954). The former as an
orthodox follower of L. H. Morgan (Moore 1969) attempts to
identify what he considers to be the legal concommitants of
each stage from savagery through barbarism to civilization.
According to Diamond, courts, for example, appear at the
first agricultural stage. However, it is not yet known to
anthropologists in what kind of settings courts are found.
Hoebel believes that the social series is both morphological
and historical and consists of a sequence from simple to
complex, from non-centralized to centralized, from private
law to public law. According to Hoebel the greatest
historical change in legal systems is the shift from systems
of self-help to systems of law enforcement by government
officials.
The third kind of classification (dispute resolution)
divides the legal system into two types: "political" and
"judicial. " In the first type there is no judge and
trouble cases are settled by a mutual testing of the two
parties' social strength and social norms are not signifi-
cant to the extent to determine the outcome. In the
judicial type there is a judge who has authority to make
183
judgments and to hand down a decision. Bohannan (1967=53)
has made a similar division. He divides power systems into
unicentric and mUlticentric types. Among the unicentric
power systems there is a central institution of legal
authority, which resolves trouble cases through the exercise
of force. Multicentric power systems, which inclu4~ the
law of stateless societies and international law, are
characterized by the absence of any subordinate authority.
Moore (1969) tells us that all these typologies narrow the
focus to certain differences in the conflict resolution
process, rather than creating the wider field considered by
Maine, Durkheim and Gluckman.
Definitions of Law:
If it is defined in terms of procedure, law is "social
control through the systematic application of the (physical)
force of a politically organized society." (Radcliffe-Brown,
1933:202). If the definition of law includes the attribute
of physical force applied by an organized state then not
all societies could be said to have law, as exemplified by
the Nuer, the Andamanese and the Kapauku, to mention only a
few. If, however, we define law in the broad sense as
"most processes of social control," as Malinowski did, then
all societies may be said to have law. In political theory,
one group identifies the law of a society as the minimal
rules of conduct acknowledged by the members of that societ~
184
as the formal commands of the governing authority of that
society. As cited in Moore (1960) Lenin argues that law
does not exist in society without a developed government,
while Marx and Engels, influenced by Morgan, admit that
law prevails among primitive societies (Nader, 1965b:4).
According to Schapera (1938:38), "any rule of conduct
likely to be enforced by the courts," is law. To Gluckman
law is "the whole reservoir of rules ... on which the judges
draw their decisions" (Moore, 1969:258). Bohannan sees
law as "doubly institutionalized," as "that body of binding
obligations •.. which has been reinstitutionalized within
the legal system (1967:47). For Bohannan the difference
between legal and other rules is that legal rules are given
double legitimacy: they exist as rules in social institu-
tions, but become law only when they are enforced by legal
institutions (Bohannan, 1967:47). Pospisil (1958) defines
law as "rules or modes of conduct made obligatory by some
sanction which is imposed and enforced for their violation
by controlling authority." Bohannan, then, emphasizes
legal institutions, and Pospisil the potential sanctions
emanating from a controlling authority. Both of these
authors do take into account the element of force, but they
put emphasis on the institutional context in which conflict
resolution and law enforcement take place (Moore, 1969:256-
260) .
Upon reviewing all of these definitions one can come
to the conclusion that definitions of law have shifted from
185
the broad and somewhat vague Malinowskian type that speaks
of the mutual rights and obligations of individuals, and of
the sanctions and incentives residing in ordinary social
relationships, to relatively recent specialized definitions
that emphasize not only force, but also the institutional
and organizational contexts of legal obligation. T~is is
an important change because it also reflects the direction
in which a good deal of research work has gone.
Laura Nader (1965b:6) tells us that anthropologist
are no longer attempting to prove the presence or absence
of law in primitive societies by reference to any single
definition of law. Rather, they want to understand how the
law is best conceived of for research purposes.
Treatment of Universals:
Some nineteenth century evolutionists postulated
theories of stages of legal development. For example, Maine
believed that law passed through three stages of development
such as: law by themistes, customary law, and the code of
law. But, since Maine, the treatment of universals in the
realm of law remained in the background until Malinowski
and more recently Hoebel, Gluckman and Pospisil expressed
their thoughts. Their treatments of universals are, however,
quite different from one another, and all differ from Maine.
Malinowski (1926) refers to law as one of the derived or
instrumental needs that in all societies have to be satis-
fied as urgently as biological requirements if man is to
186
survive. Or, as he states, there must be in all societies
a class of rules too practical to be backed up by religious
sanctions, too burdensome to be left to mere goodwill, too
personally vital to individuals to be enforced by any
abstract agency. This is the domain of legal rules (Nader,
1965b:7). Hoebel takes a different route as regards the
question of universals. He assumes that certain legal
relations are universally present and thus may be used as
categories in cross-cultural comparisons. These are a few
examples:
Homicide within the society is under
one set or conditions or another,
legally prohibited everywhere •.. virtually
every society assumes the relative social
inferiority of women ... thus it appears to
be universal on the primitive level (and
general on the civilized level) that the
husband may kill the adulterous wife caught
in flagrante delicto. For the wife to
enjoy such a privilege-right is more rare
..• law universally supports the principle
of relative exclusiveness of marital
rights.
Adultery seems always to be punishable under
the law, although just what constitutes
adultery will be variable as marriage and
kinship forms vary .. . AII legal system,
primitive and civilized, assume the impor-
tance of the kinship group, and all support
it as a medium of inheritance of property
rights ..• All legal systems give cognizance
to the existence of rights to private
property (1954:286-287).
Pospisil (1967:25-38 and 1972:15-25) by means of cross-
cultural studies, derived four universal attributes of law:
authority, intention of universal application, obligatoi,
and sanction. An authority is an individual or a subgroup
187
who possesses an influence which causes the majority of the
members of the group to conform to his decisions. Many
ethnographers have declared the absence of authority in
certain cultures. Pospisil quotes from Gusinde (1937) on
the Yaghans, who tells us that there is never a shortage
of men who, because of their old age, spotless char,acter,
long experience, and mental superiority gain such an extent
of moral influences that is equal to peculiar domination.
The second attribute of law is called the attribute
of intention of universal application. This attribute,
found to be present in all legal decisions, if applicable
as a criterion of law, demands that authority in making a
decision intends it to be applie~ to all similar situations
in the future.
Nader (1956b:7) and Lowy (1974:954) confuse obligatoi
with obligation. Obligatoi is different from obligation in
that the latter only includes duty. The former includes
duty of the one party and obligation of the other. Obligatoi
is a social relation between the privileged party possessing
the right and the obligated party who fulfills his duty
toward the former. Sanction is an important aspect of the
law, and a few authors even equate it with law. This,
however, is an extreme and erroneous position. Pospisil
(1972:23) maintains that sanctions alone are incapable of
defining phenomena as laws because there are many nonlegal
(e.g. political) decisions which carry sanctions. Political
188
decisions are not legal, because they lack the attribute of
the intention of universal application.
As regards the legal sanction, it has been usually
conceived of as having a physical nature. In this latter
work, Hoebel (1954:28) defines sanction as the following:
itA social norm is legal if its neglect or infraction
, is
regularly met, in threat or in fact, by the application of
physical force by an individual or group possessing the
socially recognized privilege of so acting." Pospisil
(1972:25) is of the opinion that sanction need not be of
physical nature only. The effectiveness of socio-psych~~
189
landmarks in the anthropology of law was a careful and
thorough report on legal rules, Schapera's Handbook of
Tswana Law and Custom (19)8). Sally F. Moore (1969:261)
tells us that the book sets an unprecedented standard for
the detailed reporting of· rules, and does so without the
slightest nod in the direction of theoretical quest~ons.
190
skill of the profession. The authors found this very skill
in the Cheyenne's resolution of disputes, and in their ways
of dealing with rule breaking. They were also fascinated
by the effective policing and order keeping techniques in
the tribe when it assembled as a whole each summer.
The Law of Primitive Man (1954) by E. A. Adamson
Hoebel once again enlightens us about the author's interests
in the legitimate application of force. In this book,
which consists of three major chapters - the Study of
Primitive Law, Primitive Law-Ways and Law and Society - the
author sketched the society, culture and law of a handful of
peoples ranging in organizational complexity from the
Eskimo to the Ashanti. All descriptions are partially
cultural and partially organizational. Each description is
accompanied by a list of what Hoebel considers to be the
basic jural postulates on which the legal system of each
people is founded. Hoebel does not indicate the criteria
he used to decide what should be indicated; nor does he
specifically cite his sources, though he indicates that he
drew his postulates from an examination of cases. There
are also several general essays included in the book in which
the nature and development of law are discussed. Hoebel
asserts that the most significant change in the historical
development of law is the shift from what he considers
private law (enforcement by kinsmen and associates) to
public law (enforcement by government), from personal re-
taliation recoupment to impersonal justice. Despite his
191
interest in enforcement, Hoebel conceives of law as dealing
with the enforceable side of a pattern of values.
The publication of The JUdicial Process Among the
Barotse by Max Gluckman in 1955 brought about new ideas in
the domain of the anthropology of law. This is the first
book to describe the proceedings before a tribunal .jn a
technologically simple society from the point of view of an
anthropologist who had actually seen them. These were not
cases recalled by informants like those in The Cheyenne Way,
but cases observed as they were argued over, thrashed out,
and ruled on. The book is a study of the techniques of the
judges in dealing with the disputes put before them.
In 1957 a casebook of dispute settlement entitled
Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv by Paul Bohannan was
published. In this book the political structure of the Tiv
was described. The author makes a distinction among the
Tiv view of the law, "the folk system," and the anthropolo-
gist's analysis of it, which he calls "the analytic system."
Bohannan's technique of describing the folk concepts of Tiv
law is to take Tiv terms and explain them at the same time
that he gets on with an illustration of a court case. He
tells us that the Tiv have "laws" but not "Law." Bohannan
thus argues that the idea of a body of rules does not exist
in the folk concepts of the Tiv. The Tiv, according to him,
do not think either of law or customs as organized in a boqy,
but rather conceive them merely one by one, as applied in
the specific social situations in which they come up.
192
Based upon this book, Bohannan's contribution to the
methodology of description lies in his formulation of the
folk versus the analytical system. This was an argument
between Bohannan and Gluckman (Nader, 1965b:11, Moort· in
Nader, 1969:343-348, and Gluckman, 1969:51-355). Bohannan
raised for inspection statements made by Hoebel (1~59:46)
193
folk systems, but both are in disagreement with him about
the use of many folk terms which make it hard for the
reader in English to understand dozens of folk terms in one
page.
During my field work I neither fully followed Hoebel
who collected his data from elderly informants (mem~ry
194
own categories. Therefore, in this study, I first intro-
duce and define a native term and then whenever the term
appears, I give equivalent English translation or gloss.
Dispute Settlement:
The central theme of this dissertation includes the
ways and means by which Pashtuns resolve their conflicts.
The concept of social conflict was discussed for the first
time in the newly organized American Sociological Society
in 1907. The central paper was read by the Social Darwinist
Thomas N. Carver. Carver (1907 as cited in Coser 1956) said
that "there may be many cases where there is a complete
harmony of interests, but these give rise to no problems
and therefore we do not need to concern ourselves about
them." Carver (1907) maintained that only where disharmony
and antagonism prevailed could one speak at all of a moral
and of a scientific problem (Coser 1956:15).
Social conflict was once again the main topic of
discussion in 1930. Howard W. Odum, at the twenty-sixth
annual meeting of the American Sociological Society in his
presidential address, stated that social conflict is socio-
logically an unexplored field. The sociology of conflict
had yet to be written. A generation later, Jessie Bernard
has once again asked, "Where is the modern sociology of
conflict? Even a cursory examination of the contemporary
work of sociologists clearly indicates that conflict has
been neglected indeed as a field of investigation." (Coser"
1956:15-16).
195
In exploring conflict theory one encounters a number
of terminological problems. Conflict is used colloquially
in anthropological and sociological literature to refer to
fighting, confrontation, tension and to incompatibility.
The two usages are related - incompatibility of aims leads
to fighting. Fighting is bad, and conflict too becomes a
value - laden ter~ Conflict ought to be resolved. According
to Lloyd (1968:29) incompatibility is a more neutral word.
It is in the fighting or confrontation sense than I use the
term conflict in this essay as in fact it is used by many
other anthropologists. Sociologists generally use the term
conflict in the sense of incompatibility and tension.
To Westerners in general and perhaps to other nations
of the world conflict is "a bad thing." According to
Bohannan (1967:xi) Westerners as a category of people do
not like to think about or talk about cancer, or hate or
death - or conflict. Bohannan tells us that it "is a
tactical error, because conflict is just as basic an
element as sex in the mammalian and cultural nature of man"
(1967:xi). Coser (1956:20) and Dahrendort (1957:135)
believe that conflict of some sort is the life of society.
According to Coser (1956:20) progress emerges from a
struggle in which individual, class, or institution seeks
to realize its own idea of good. Weber insisted that
"conflict cannot be excluded from social life ... Peace is
nothing more than a change in the form of conflict, or in
the antagonists, or in the objects of the conflict" (1956: 21).
To Marx and his followers the history of mankind is often
presented in the form of a record of wars between nations
and the exploits of individual monarchs, generals or states-
men (Burns 1966:10).
Conflict has been with human beings since their
beginnings. It is a part of our life and it is not..... always
bad and dysfunctional. A certain degree of conflict is an
essential element in group formation and the persistence of
group life. Bohannan tells that:
We shall never banish conflict ... Rather,
conflict must be controlled and must be
utilized profitably in order to create
more and better cultural means of living
and working together... Conflict is use-
ful. In fact, society is impossible with-
out conflict. But society is worse than
impossible without control of conflict.
The analogy of sex is relevant [her~:
society is impossible without regulated
sexuality: the degree of regulation
differs among societies. But total re-
pression leads to extinction; total lack
of repression also leads to extinction.
Total repression of conflict leads to
anarchy just as surely as does total con-
flict (1967:xi-xii).
The central theme of this study also revolves around
the concept of conflict. It has been emphatically indicated
in this Chapter VII that conflict persists among the Pashtun
villagers. Yet in this chapter data has been presented
which indicate that there is a limit to the conflict situa-
tion. There are checks and balances, and there are norms
and rules which do not allow conflict to exceed its limit.
There are special people who apply.these norms and rules in
order to control conflict. In this manner in my theoretical
197
point of view of conflict theory I am more inclined toward
Gluckman (1969) and Bohannan (1967 and 1969) rather than to
Parsons whose view of conflict is that of having primarily
discruptive, dissociative and dysfunctional consequences.
Parsons considers conflict primarily a "disease." He
attempts to establish a parallel between a medical man
trea.ting a sick patient and a propaganda specialist treating
a sick society (Coser 1956:22).
Case studies:
As has been mentioned before, it was not until the
pUblication of Llewellyn and Hoebel's The Cheyenne Way
(1941) that anthropology produced a book focused on legal
cases. The argument that the case study is the best field
technique for the investigation of dispute settlement, :legal
rules, and legal concepts is presented in a recent article
by A. L. Epstein in "The Case Method and the Field of Law"
(1967). In this paper the universal characteristics of
law as legal systems are described. Epstein starts with
rules, concepts and categories and then proposes the use of
the case technique rather than informants to discover what
they are. Then he talks about dispute and considers it as
a universal phenomenon among human societies. Epstein
finally suggests that the sequence of events be called a
case, although it may be isolated for certain analytical
purposes, must be considered in its social matrix if one is
to fully understand its place in the social process.
198
In his Introduction to The Craft of Social Anthro-
pology (1967) Gluckman hails the extended case method as a
new tool in social anthropology. According to Gluckman,
"This new kind of analysis treats each case as a stage in
an ongoing process of social relation between specific
persons and groups in a social system and culture. ':" (1967 :
xv) .
Richard T. Antoun's Arab Village (1972), Schuler
Jones' Men of Influence in Nuristan, Afghanistan, (1974) and
Laura Nader's "Style of Court Procedure: To Make a Balance"
(1969) are important case studies. Antoun's and Jones'
studies are best examples of the applicability of method
and practice in the same culture area where this study has
been conducted. Nader's study is important because it is
an example of case analysis. Antoun studied an Arab village
called Kufr al-Ma situated in the eastern foothills of the
Jordan Valley. All through his fieldwork he himself ob-
served nine different trouble cases from their starting
point until their ending. Some of these cases involved
marriages, others property damage, and some were rape cases.
Out of all these nine cases only two, an injury case and
one rape case, were brought to the court. The remaining trouble
cases were all settled through the council of elders or
through the village mukhtar (village semi-official leader,
like a village mayor elected from the people of the village1
Jones' in Men of Influence in Nuristan makes a survey
of the Nuristani people in Afghanistan. He discusses their
199
political organization in the absence of rulers. The
author identifies the politically significant individuals
and defines their roles in the affairs of the valley, where
they seek to control political events by influence rather
than authority. Several detailed case studies of actual
disputes are presented and the ways in which socia~ equi-
librium is maintained or restored are described. The very
last chapter of Men of Influence, "Asel Din Khan v. s. Wakil
Azim Khan" is a very exciting case study. Each of these
individuals were le~ders of two opposing factions. One
leader was in favor of constructing a road to the village
while the other was opposed to it. This struggle lasted
for years while there were shifts of power from one faction
to the other, but finally Asel Din killed Wakil AzimKhan.
After one year of lapse, two of Azim's agnates killerl Asel Din.
Jones says that feuding is not present, but the case shows
it ~ present and stlllgoing on between the parties involved.
Laura Nader's "Style of Court Procedure: To Make the
Balance" looks at a Mexican Zapotec court of law. She has
used materials taken from the film "To Make the Balance"
(1967). There are five cases in the film. The case
studies show that a compromise arrived at is by adjudication
or, in some cases, adjudication based on compromise. The
particular settlement to a given dispute may be a fine, jail,
ridicule, or acquittal of the principals in the case, but
the aim is to rectify the situation by achieving or rein-
stating a balance between the parties involved in a dispute,
200
a word that is synonymous with imbalance among the Zapotec.
Whatever factors enter into the decision-making process,
the restoration of equilibrium determines the final settle-
ment and is the goal of this system of dispute settlement.
The main body of the paper is divided into three sections:
the socio-cultural setting, the case materials, an4 a
discussion and comparison. This technique is useful and is
potentially promising. In fact, each case has a spatial
and temporal dimension. The investigators can observe what
is happening and why, when and where the case started, who
are involved in tne trouble cases and why, who is the
decision-maker and why, and how the dispute is settled.
From a very short case study we might be able to answer
many questions, and we can use one case for different kinds
of analyses even in different areas of anthropology.
In my analysis of trouble-cases I followed Epstein
(1967). Incidents and episodes observed by the anthro-
pologist and recorded in his notebook are the material
which he builds up his account of the social system. The
cases collected for this study are trouble-cases. By
trouble-case, I mean a conflicting incident which disturbs
peaceful and balanced social relationships between the
parties involved. Theft, injury, adultery and homicide are
examples of trouble-cases. Case method, is the study of
particulars cases from which we make generalizations.
According to Epstein (1967:215) there are three aspects to
the problem: the inquiry into guilt or responsibility for
201
a particular event; the process of adjudication between the
conflicting claims; and the modes of redress and enforcement
where a breach of entitlement has been established or
assumed. The case method has the further advantage that,
in delineating aspects of law, we are also able to map out
a number of problem areas and suggest topics for further
,
research even outside the domain of anthropology.
It should be pointed out that the case method does
have disadvantages. One may have to sit through many long
disputes before a case comes up involving some novel or
critical point on which one is anxious to have information
and, indeed, the whole period of fieldwork may pass without
such issues coming up for juridical discussion. I overcame
this problem through asking my informants about the cases
that happened in the past.
For the purpose of the analysis, I will categorize the
trouble-cases under the subheadings of theft, land, mounta~
202
missionaries, soldiers and the like. During the 1950's a
series of important anthropological monographs on the law
or particular non-western societies was produced. The
1960's was the time during which anthropologists began to
recognize their thinking on law in terms of a choice of
problem, and methodological approach. Since then the
,
anthropology of law has improved considerably in theory
and method. The scholars in this area have placed more
emphasis on the development of cases and on the development
of legal rules, and procedural practices through time.
This is partly because of the analytic problem thrust on
anthropology by a rapidly changing world. Anthropologists
have realized that in our rapidly changing world the struc-
tural-functionalists synchronic approach was no longer
profitable and productive. It is also partly because it is
the obvious next step after the kind of ethnographic work
that has already been done. Future law studies in anthro-
pology are most likely to follow this trend. Moore (1969)
tells us that generalizations about law, and about the
rules, ideas and procedures of the resolution of conflict
have often been derived from the case studies from the
past. Cases will be considered in the future in greater
detail, as microcosms of dynamic interaction, and also as
a part of both short- and long-term processes of instituti~
20J
each case as an isolated incident before a court; but he
now considered that the next step must be the intensive
study of processes of social control in limited areas of
social life viewed over a period of time. This emphasis
on detailed, temporally extended case studies also implies
a focus on processes of change. According to Moor~ (1969)
the anthropology of law is likely to see more historical
investigations of institutional change over periods of
varying length. Except for Schapera (1941) anthropologists
have given little attention to legislation. This will be
another potential area for legal anthropological investiga-
tions.
Just as the dimension of time increases the number of
analytical problems preceived, so does the collection of
detailed cases. For instance, it is significant to under-
stand not only what the rules are concerning the transfer
of land, but also how often it is actually transferred. In
the past the number of cases of particular kinds came to
the courts or other dispute resolving bodies, but why some
kinds of matters are more often in dispute than others has
not been gone into at all; nor do we know between what sort
of people and in what sorts of situations these disputes are
likely to arise. On the other hand, we do not know what
kinds of situations do not produce disputes.
Laura Nader (1974), in addition to isolating conceptual
boundaries, maintains that case studies may also be useful
as tools to study the choice of dispute settlement mecha~
204
that consistently result in differential treatment of
certain persons. This, in fact, leads the ethnographer to
a more extended investigation of the relationship between
persons and sanctioning groups. Moore (1969:294) notes
that there is a new emphasis on sequence of events - on
legal transactions, disputes and rules seen in the,dimensian
of time. Case studies of this sort bring the minutiae of
social interaction into focus and thereby reveal certain
general processes in detail, whereas historical studies
illustrate large-scale continuities and changes. In the
future law and legal institutions are likely to be analyzed
simul taneously fron. a long-term historical perspective, and
from the perspective of individual-centered, short-term,
choice-making, instrumental action and interaction.
The inhabitants of Almara have developed a special
way of maintaining their social order utilizing mechar.isms
of social control and dispute settlement. This response
is noteworthy considering the social, historical, ecological
and geographical constraints placed upon them. In this
chapter we will discuss the procedures and processes of
Almara conflict resolutions at four levels. Toward this
end we will define and compare the concepts of mediation,
arbitration, "intermediary," oath and ordeal(s). A series
of "trouble-cases" will be analyzed cases.
Pashtuns are people who live by a body of tsali
(codes) known in the literature as "tribal laws," "tra-
ditional laws" or "customary laws." These tsali (plural
205
of tsale, Pashto) are thought of as common and distinctive
to all Pashtuns particularly in Paktya Province in Southern
Afghanistan. The Pashto language may be included under
this heading as it is a necessary and distinctive feature,
but in itself it is not sufficient; we are not dealing
simply with a linguistic group. Pashtuns have an e~plicit
saying, "We are Pashtuns who do "pashto, " not merely who
speak Pashto;" and "doing Pashto" in this sense means
living by enacting the code or Pashtuns' shari~, in terms
of which some people who speak Pashto consistently fall
short.
According to Barth (1969:119) these tsali (codes) are
imagined by the actors to be consistent with, and comple-
mentary to, Islam. The tsali originated from the Pashtunf
,
customary or traditional laws, and are interpreted by a
particular category of people called marakachiah (traditional
tribal judges, lawyers, mediators and arbitrators). The
notion of Pashtun tsali (codes), mediation and/or arbitration
is expanded below.
A tsale is a trail or a pathway, demarcated by
pillars, in order to lead pedestrians and passengers to
the right goal or target. As mentioned in Chapter VI, the
Muslim Community developed shari~ to lead them to the right
way in their lives, the Pashtuns have developed their own
way of dealing with their social, economic, political and
legal systems to maintain peace and harmony in their own
small social field in the Afghan social system. Moore
206
(1973:721) has observed that " •.. It is well established
that between the body politic and the individual, there
are interposed various smaller organized social fields to
which the individual belongs. These social fields have
their own customs and rules and the means of coercing or
inducing compliance." ....
Beyond those general similarities the Pashtuns'tsali
or "Pashto" (also called Leyar) in many aspects deviate
from the Islamic sharia' (Quran and hadi th) • An informant
told me the following in this particular respect: "We
inherited the Islamic sharia' from the Prophet Muhammad.
What we call tsale is left to us from Abu Jahl." Abu Jahl
was Muhammad's uncle who was a very strong opponent of his
nephew and Islam and did not himself profess Islam until
the end of his life. As we continue the discussion and
explain several tsali (codes) and penalties the difference
between the two will be made clear.
207
utilized in different contexts and have different
meanings.
208
of confrontation with another community very often all
men villagers may come to the meeting. If there is to be
an election of three or four individuals for guarding the
forests and irrigation channel system or building a new
mosque in the village only some of the elderly individuals
may participate. '
Maraka and tukhum (both Pashto terms) refer to the
meetings of the village councilor council of elders. They
differ in terms of their symbolic meaning, function and
the number of people involved. Before discussing their
differences I would like to point out some of the features
they hold in common. Maraka and tukhum are both meetings
of men, called by one or several of those present (or those
who are not present, the litigants) so as to arrive at a
joint decision on a matter of common concern. The matter
of common concern may be a resolution of conflict between
the parties present or a settlement of dispute between a
group not present. It might be a resolution of conflict
over a piece of land or a settlement of a homicide, injury
or theft. The relationship between members of the maraka
and the tukhum is one of surface equality with no speaker,
leader or chairman. Equality is emphasized by circular
seating on the ground and the equal right of all to speak.
The body does not arrive at final decisions through voting;
discussions and negotiations continue until the decision
is unopposed and it is thereby unanimous and binding as an
individual decision on each participant.
209
However, I have to note that in a group some
individuals may be more experienced, wise and ambitious
than others. Those individuals wield considerable
influence and power. Although they discuss the matters
with council members and occasionally offering their
opinions at the meeting, they often leave the othe~ members
to talk and suggest what they think is appropriate. After
the body discusses an issue for days or even months, and
tire of discussion, the experienced persons knowing the
tendency of the members, make their suggestions. These·
suggestions are very often accepted because the decision
might be a combination of suggestions made by all members.
A faction or an individual who will not accept a
decision can only avoid commitment by leaving the circle
in protest. The maraka or the tukhum then discusses the
issue further and reviews the points raised by the protester.
Because one or more of the members of the council have
left the assembly in protest, they may adjourn the meeting
temporarily for a day or so, so that the protestors can
reconsider their position and accept the satisfied council's
view and join the group again. Often one or two members
of the council may go to the protestor(s) and ask him to
return to the meeting, so that a unanimous decision can be
reached.
The maraka and tukhum are thus both forums for acting
out important Pashtun virtues, such as courage, virility,
judgment, justice, independence and morality. A man's
210
influence and the respect shown him is made apparent for
when he talks, silence prevails in the meetings. On the
more fundamental level, these organizations confirm the
basic integrity and autonomy of men, and the basically
voluntary nature of the social contract among the Pashtuns.
They allow groups of men to arrive at joint decisions
without any participants' independence; they produce binding
corporate decisions about concerted action. This is done
without dissembling the structure of egalitarian balanced
segments through the introduction of anyone's right to
give commands. The following discussion will provide the
distinction between maraka and tukhum.
Maraka:
Maraka consists of two to ten or more individuals,
depending on the case's importance. If the conflict is
between two individuals, two families or between lineages
and the dispute is over a matter of unimportant injury
(such as a small injury on the head), or when the conflict
concerns a small amount of money (100 to 1,000 Afs.,
50 Afs. = $1.00) or in situations where the dispute is
based upon a small plot of land, (one-fourth or one-eighth
of an acre), or a house, the maraka will be called upon to
resolve the trouble. I call these types of cases minor
trouble-cases.
211
Tukhum (Pashtun Supreme Court):
212
The local Pashtun legal system is similarly organized.
When a dispute arises between two individuals or two
political groups the maraka will be called upon. This
meeting is called awel maraka (Primary Council of Elders).
The attendance of the first maraka depends on the
importance of the case and the amount of property apd/or
damage involved. When a dispute occurs between two
families of the same lineage over, for instance, 1,000 Afs.
two elderly wise men of the village may be invited by the
parties involved to go to the scene and gather facts about
the case. They go and see the two parties involved and
after collecting sufficient information, they adjudicate
the trouble case. Now the litigants have the freedom
whether or not to accept the resolution proposed. If
either side does not accept the decision made by the first
maraka they have the right to reject the settlement. The
dissatisfied party calls the adjudication kazhah (deviated
or bent). They claim the Pashtun tsale has been mis-
interpreted. Now, they can call upon two other members
of the village council to judge the decision made by the
first maraka. These two individuals together with the first
two persons make a secondary maraka. The two new individuals
have the right to ask the first maraka the reason for their
decision and the pertinent tsale (code). Sometimes the
members of the first maraka themselves may feel incompetent
to resolve the case or they realize that the case is
getting more serious so they themselves ask for the equiva-
21)
lent number of the marakachian (members of the council)
and willingly make the second maraka.
On many occasions even the second maraka (Secondary
Court) may not be able to settle the dispute. In many
incidents because of competition between the parties even
a minor trouble case may pass through all three stages of
adjudication. If the second maraka decision is not
accepted by any of the parties involved or when the members
of the council themselves feel that the case is becoming
more serious and they are incapable of resolving it, one
or the other may call upon the tukhum. Tukhum is a type of
village council in which the members of different Zadran
lineages (khels) and other tribes are involved. Sometimes
the tukhum includes the members of both Pashtun moieties,
the Kerraor Keryani 4 (or Durani) and the Ghelja or Ghezai.
The term Kerra in Pashto means the inhabitants of the
mountains. The Ker~a moiety consists of Sabari, Manduzai,
Tani, Mangel, Zadran and Gurbuz tribes. Ghelja includes
Ahmadzai, Tuta-khel, Suleiman-khel, Ander, Kuchis (nomadic
tribes). Many other members of these two moieties live
in other provinces such as Kandahar. The Ker~a moiety
belongs to what is called Spean Gund (White ~loc) and the
Ghelja belongs to Tor Gund (Black Bloc).
214
of the Pashto speaking people in the area are divided into
2 large blocs called Spean Gund (White Bloc) and Tor Gund
(Black Bloc). The split is not based upon the concept of
race or skin color. The origin of the dichotomy is explained
in myth: several centuries ago a big jirgah (council of
elders) representing many Pashtun tribes was held in one
of the villages in Paktya Province. The members of the
jirgah were discussing a tribal trouble-case. Suddenly,
the argument arose as to whether there were more white
feathers or black feathers on a mockingbird. The members
of the council who favored the former position that there
were more white feathers - were classified as Spean Gund
(White Bloc) and the members who favored the latter
position - that, there were more black feathers - were called
Tor Gund (Black Bloc).
A second view attributes the origin of this dualism
to the British rulers. Several of my informants told me
that "This nonsense idea was brought to the scene by
Engrazan (the British People) in order to create conflicts
and tensions between the people and, therefore, based upon
their famous formula of "divide and rule" makes it easier
to run their colonies without many difficulties."
Despite the fact, in a decision made by Tukhum which
includes a great number of individuals possibly from both
Blocs (Tor and Spean Gunds)the Spean Gund decision is more
reliable and the presence of Spean Gund members is more
215
important (see cases 11, 14 and 15). This investigator
believes that since most of the member tribes of the Spean
Gund category live in the mountainous and marginal areas
and have not had as much contact with urban centers as the
Tor Gund category have had, they have kept their way of
life relatively unchanged and their traditional and,
customary laws untouched. They also are probably more
traditional than the other bloc.
According to my informants an ideal tukhum (Pashtun
local Supreme Court) may include eight or more individuals.
They are usually invited from the following important
Zadran lineages (khels) by the parties in conflict. One
person from Yahya-khel, the second from Dari-khel, the
third from Mazi, the fourth from Ziawo Din (from Tangi)
the fifth from Malek Din (also from Tangi),the sixth from
Zani-khel, and the seventh and eighth individuals both come
from the village of Almara. Each member represents a large
lineage.
216
1. When there is no £ighting going on, but the threat
o£ con£rontation is felt and/or the contestants themselves
want a resolution to the conflict, they send a messenger
or a carrier (lerana) to the members of a maraka to come
and settle the trouble-case.
2. When there is a serious confrontation re~ulting
217
prevent them. Most often people do not want to get involved
or take responsibility in such cases, because when an
animal is killed in front of someone's hamlet the owner of
the settlement is morally and customarily obligated to help
the "poor" plaintiff in whatever manners and measures he
can.
After killing the animal the offended informs the
owner of the hamlet of the details of the trouble-case and
tells him what kind of help he needs. In the morning the
animal is cooked and the powerful man invites his kinsmen
and other villagers to eat the animal and share the respons~
218
interrogate litigants. They ask members of the village
for evidence. They examine the injured person if it is an
injury case. They go to the scene if it is a trouble case
involving land or a division of a mountain forest. After
collecting the information they return to the village to
make a decision. If the trouble was not serious and the
damage was minor, they adjudicate the case through mediation.
In this case there is no need to ask for a baramta
(guarantee) from the parties so that they might be forced
to accept the decision made by the marakchian. When the
trouble is serious and the damage great, arbitration and
intermediary procedures are llsed to resolve the conflict.
Swartz, Turner and Tuden (1966:J6) have defined the three
processes as follows:
If the decision of the third party
~araka and tukhum~ must be accepted,
we may speak of 'arbitration,' with
the implication that the decision of
arbitrator(s) is underwritten either
by strong legal or strong religious
sanction. If negotiations are conditioned
on voluntary acceptance by both con-
testants of the settlement proposed by
the third party, we may speak of'rrediation:
Mediation involves the sustained inter-
vention of the mediator{s), who must be
concerned with more than the legal issues
at stake and must utilize a variety of
pragmatic techniques - ranging from
friendly advice and pressure to formula-
tions of new terms - to bring about a
reconciliation of the interests of the
opposed parties .•.
In other situations we may speak of
'intermediaries' rather than mediators -
when neither party will accept the third
parties claim to be impartial. In such
219
an instance the possibility of an
outbreak of overt hostility is so
strong that negotiation has to proceed
between intermediaries who represent
each party, since a face-to-face con-
frontation of the faction leaders is
not possible or practical.
Mediation:
When the trouble case is unimportant, damage'and
property involved are minor, the marakachian (mediators)
without asking the contestants for a baramta (guarantee)
adjudicate the case. A baramta could include a piece of
property which could be worth from 20,000 to 100,000 Afs.
or more depending on how important and serious the case
is. A baramta (guarantee) could be made in cash or in kind
such as some pieces of furniture, an Afghan rug, rifle and
pistols. The baramta is held so that when the marakachian
(arbitrators) make their decision it will be carried out.
The mediators are very often elderly members of the
village council, and may include imam of the mosque and
one or two holy men from within the village or neighboring
villages. Mediators utilize a variety of pragmatic
techni~ues such as friendly advice, asking for a spirit of
forgiveness and tolerance. The presence of holy men is
intended to encourage the plaintiff to forgive the offender.
Arbitration:
Another type of adjudication of disputes is arbitra-
tion. Whenever the maraka or tukhum is convened for an
important trouble case the arbitrators ask both sides for a
220
baramta (a guarantee) in order to put pressure on the
contestants to accept the decision made by the council.
Before the council members make their decision they collect
the baramta (guarantee) and ask for a wak5 0r authority.
A wak is a right and authority given from the litigants
to the marakachian (members of the village council~ to
adjudicate the trouble case in whatever manner they see
fit. After the ~~ was granted the decision was made by
the members of the councili if the party refuses to accept
the decision, he loses the baramta (guarantee).
221
Hospitality:
A peculiar and important element of Pashtun culture
is their hospitality. According to Muhammad Ali, "Pashtuns
are considered to be the most hospitable people in the
world." (1965:23). A Pashtun, however, poor, feels himself
delighted and honored to receive a guest. All persons,
irrespective of rank, religion or nationality, are entitled
to benefit from this practice.
Hospitality involves a set of conventions whereby
the person who is on horne ground has an obligation toward
the outsider to incorporate him into the local group
temporarily and to be responsible for his security, and
provide for his needs. The obligation is brought into play
by the visitors presenting himself in the alien setting.
Accordingly, a stranger on the road who passes close to
someone who is having a meal will be offered food, someone
corning to a village will be greeted and helped by residents,
a friend making his appearance will promptly be made
welcome. In return, the guest is obligated to recognize
the authority and sovereignty of the host over property and
persons present. In this host-guest relation, any single
encounter is temporary and the status thereby reversible
and reciprocal and hospitality is thus easily an idiom of
equality and alliance between parties. A consistently
unilateral host-guest relationship. on the other hand,
entails dependence and political submission by the guest.
222
Barth, in relation to the Swat Pathan system of
hospitality tells us that:
In the traditional pattern of organization
in Swat, chiefs maintain positions of
leadership through hospitality in their
men's house, expending wealth in rice, etc.,
in return for political prestations of
submission from followers, who consume the
rice. The followers thus obtained are used
to protect, and preferably expand the trans-
port and sale of rice in the grain markets
of Peshawar, one hundred miles distant.
This kind of transaction of perishable for
imperishable wealth presents the individual
chief with a dilemma of choice, demanding
over-arching principles of evaluation of
hospitality, might and wealth relative to
each other. Simultaneously, the native
ruler offers some degree of security of
title to land for a chief in return for a
reduction in his autonomy (Barth 1966:16).
A few chiefs started deviating from the old pattern
as early as the late 1930's; they gained greatly in wealth
but lost their political following by discontinuing their
men's house feasting. They lost their autonomy through
having to rely on the ruler and his power for the protection
of their estate; however, they tended the estate of the
chief, from which the wealth in rice derives, in a circle
of conversion. The values and strategic circumstances
underlying this institutional complex have been described
in this way. A high value on autonomy, might, wealth and
hospitality in a situation of anarchic rivalry between
chiefs who compete for clients will generate this and a
number of other characteristic patterns of choice. Barth
has said that:
223
In a situation without alternative market
outlets for rice, there was indeed no
alternative course whereby any separate
one or several of these values could be
effectively maximized. Since the initial
pacification of the lower Swat Valley in
1895, and particularly since the emergence
of a centralized native state in the rest
of the valley, and the construction of a
road network in the 1930's, a real alterna-
tive has been present, to use chiefs in ,
delegated positions of administrative
prominence, so few suffered a visible loss
in might (Barth 1966:16).
Barth's analysis and discovery of the Pathan system
hospitality and its functions with regard to the Swat
Pathans' political and economic system seems logical and
well argued. It is unfortunate, however, that his hypothesis
seems applicable only among Swat Pathans, and does not
hold among Pushtun ethnic groups in Afghanistan. First of
all Pushtuns in Afghanistan do not cultivate enough rice
to cause marketing problems. Second, Barth's whole theory
of hospitality among Swat Pathan circles around political
submission and economic transactions. He disregards social,
psychological, geographical and historical elements. In
a region such as Western Pakistan, the present Pushtunistan,
and East and Southern Afghanistan, which for the most part
are mountainous areas. Travel is difficult between villages
and towns, particularly during the harsh and snowy winter.
Few roads and little transportation were available even
thirty or forty years ago. Moreover, looking back at the
history of Afghanistan, the capital of the country and the
major cities were distant from the area. It would
224
occasionally become necessary to go to those major centers.
If the Pushtuns had not developed that kind of system of
hospitality, their lives would have been largely in danger.
To sum up the main point, the Pashtuns have developed
their system of hospitality not only because of its
economic function in their political system, but also as
a means of adaptation to their ecological, social,
historical and physical environment. They have developed
this system for their survival: for fear of dying from
cold, snow, hunger and danger from brigands and predators.
Let us return to the question of providing room and
board for visiting arbitrators. The responsibility of
providing food and accommodation for the arbitrators is
decided on the first day by pacha achawel (game of chance).
In the lottery the parties involved ask an impartial
individual to write down the names of two persons, each on
a single piece of paper. One name from party A, one from
party B, The papers are then folded and put in a hat and
shaken. Still another impartial individual is asked to
pick a paper from the hat, The writer reads the name, If
the name reads A, B loses ani thus he has to host the aroitrators,
If no literate person is present at the time, the
parties use an alternate method of chosing a "host," This
time both sides ask an impartial individual to take 2
clumps of mud and place a different object inside of each,
perhaps a leaf or twig. Each mudball is molded identically.
225
The mudballs are then placed in a sack. Next the parties
are asked who wants which one - leaf or twig. Then a last
impartial individual is asked to pick out one ball from
the sack. If the chosen ball has a leaf and belongs to
A, then B looses-
The party who loses the game will be responsible for
the first turn. This particular type of food provision for
the council members is known as katow 6 (food preparation).
When members of the village council adjudicate the
trouble case through mediation, the contestants provide
inexpensive food. They may slaughter four or five chickens
and may cook about sixteen or twenty pounds of rice together
with five or six pounds of green beans. This type of dish
is called dendaki and it is very common among the tribesmen
of southern Afghanistan. Sometimes about ten pounds of
beef is cooked instead and a special soup is made and served
with rice.
Whenever the second maraka is convened or the tukhum
is invited the case is seen to be very important. The
serious and important trouble cases are homicide and inter-
tribal-warfare, or a dispute over the division of mountain
forests and common land. In these situations many people
are involved and the competition between the contestants is
great. Therefore, the parties may begin with slaughtering
goats and sheep at the beginning of the settlement process
and might end in slaughtering cows and oxen as the process
proceeds. An informant who was involved in the process of
226
arbitration told me that the parties who were involved
first began to slaughter one or two sheep for the council
members and finally the competition increased to the point
that contestants were slaughtering several oxen upon their
turns. As a result the whole village was fed for several
weeks. In addition, a lot of meat was fed to the dDgS.
All this was done because one contestant might defeat the
other by showing himself more hospitable.
The nature of the role of the arbitrators and
mediators and their popularity in society necessitates
their impartiality. When members of a maraka make their
decision they announce it to both parties. If it happens
that one of the parties is not satisfied with the settle-
ment, thus losing the baramta to the other party, they
have two alternatives: (1) they can ask for the second
level maraka which includes the first maraka, or (2) they
can ask for an oath by the members of the first maraka to
swear to God that they were honest in their judgments and
decision. With the first alternative, the same number of
new arbitrators is chosen. In the second alternative, the
number of persons who might be asked for an oath varies
from two to ten. It has been the custom among the Pashtuns
that when a member of the maraka is asked to take the oath,
the party is obliged to pay 1,000 Afs. ($1 = 50 Afs.) to
each individual who v:qS a~ xed to swear.
When the arbitrators filake their decision and it is
accepted by the litigants the baramta (guarantee) is
227
returned to the owners. With the return of the baramta
(guarantee) the trouble case is settled and the contestant
groups are no longer enemies and, academically the case
becomes closed.
Khalat:
Before the case becomes officially closed the parties
involved are traditionally required to give some money to
each arbitrator. This money is called khalat. On many
occasions when the parties are pleased with the arbitrators'
adjudication the contestants provides the members of the
council of elders with expensive turbans which signifies
good manners and respect on the part of litigants.
Imams of the mosques and other religious people who
have read the figh (jurisprudence) and know Islamic shari~
believe that the amount of money given by the parties to
arbitrators as khalat constitutes bribery and/or selling
of their efforts in the process of adjudication and there-
fore. forbidden by Islam. My research indicates that the
process of adjudication of many trouble cases has continued
for as long as a year. The same arbitrators usually stay
with a case from beginning to end. This can involve
considerable sacrifice of time and income when trouble
c'ases last long: and in some cases frequent traveling betv.een
cities can involve considerable expense. In addition, of
course, they are prevented from working their own farms.
To help defray these expenses the khalat is given. Payment
228
can be somewhat unpredictable because the arbitrator is
not supposed to ask for the khalat but must wait for the
contestants to initiate payment. I believe a danger exists
in the event that they do not receive the khalat. If the
arbitrators continue their arbitration without having anyother
sources of income they may become susceptible to br,ibery.
Intermediary:
The use of "intermediary" is the third type of dispute
settlement. Whenever the trouble case is serious and when
either the hostile situation does not permit the litigants
face-to-face negotiations or the two sides cannot agree on
the impartiality of the mediator and arbitrator each side
chooses their own representatives from the members of the
council of elders. In this case each party tries to select
honest, popular and wise intermediaries. While each group
of intermediaries represents one side and each group tries
to win the game, both groups are still constrained by
Pashtun customary laws and codes. As with mediation and
arbitration, intermediaries begin by asking for baramta
(guarantee) from both sides. After a thorough appraisal of
the overall case they come to a decision. Anyone who does
not accept the decision loses their baramta (guarantee)
and according to "pashto" or Pashtuns' nerkh (literally
means customs or norms) the aberrant side would be called
kabergen (arogant or offender) and labeled as one who does
not abide the norms and the laws of their own society. The
229
kabergen party also may lose the support of marakachian
(council). In such cases the maraka is adjourned and the
baramta goes to the opposite side.
This procedure for the adjudication of trouble cases
is similar to that of hiring a lawyer for a case which is
referred to a state court in Afghanistan or in Western
societies where the opponents do not want to resolve the
case through face-to-face negotiations. Two differences
should be pointed out however: (1) there is no pre-
determined fee for the intermediaries although at the very
end of the dispute settlement they may receive some khalat
and (2) adjudication is done by intermediaries and not in
a court by a judge.
The following trouble case from the outset seemed to
be unimportant but became a very serious trouble case. The
case passed three stages of the Pashtun courts: the awel
maraka (primary court), the dwawom maraka (secondary court),
and the tukhum (supreme court).
230
grain.
One day when the owner o£ the horse saw the hen once
again start to scatter the hay and eat the grain, the man
caught the hen. He did not kill the hen but pulled its
£eathers off and then returned it to his neighbor. There
were no men in the house at the time but a few women were
sitting near the main gate of the hamlet. When the women
looked at the naked hen with surpise, the women asked why
he did not kill the hen. The man answered with anger that
their husbands will face the same fate. The object of
defeathering the hen was to insult the owners.
When the men o£ the household came horne and saw the
hen, they asked the women what had happened to it. The
women did not hide anything and told the whole story. The
men wanted to retaliate in kind. A quarrel ensued and the
parties involved were advised to call upon a maraka to
adjudicate the dispute.
Both sides agreed that the case should be heard and
adjudicated by the council members of Almara. They named
two ~arakachian7 (council members) and send them a lerana
(messenger). The two men carne to Mandozai. Then these
marakachian asked for a baramta. The baramta was two rifles
for each side. After the baramta was collected the opponents
took turns to provide food and service for the council
members while they were discussing the issue. Both sid~s
231
realized they would be unable to resolve the disputants
differences so they asked that a second maraka be called
upon. The disputants agreed and sent a lerana (messenger)
again to Almara to ask for two more council members.
With more guests the competition between the disputants
became very tense. Each time the members of council were
invited to one of the parties' house a sheep would be
slaughtered. After several weeks the maraka could not find
a solution to the trouble case to satisfy both sides, there-
fore, disputants were asked to call upon the tukhum.
Messengers were sent to invite the tukhum (eight
persons). Now not only were two families involved in the
trouble case, but two lineages were in competition with the
arrival of the tukhum each side forced to slaughter oxen at
each turn. A part of the meat was served to the guests
and families, the remainder being destroyed. The tukhum
could not propose such a resolution to the case to please
both sides.
At this time an unknown person reported the case to
the government because of the fear that the two groups
would fight. Consequently, many people were jailed from
both sides. The case was referred to the state secondary
court (Mahkama Movaf! ) with no success. The judge invited
the local famous fogaha (jurists) to look into the case.
The fogaha (jurists) could not suggest a satisfactory
resolution either because none of these adjudicators could
find such a case in figh or in Pashtuns"j codes.
232
When the jailed disputants heard that neither the
tribal councils nor the judges and famous local jurists
could settle the dispute, having spent so much on enter-
tainment and frivolities, reported to the government that
they solved the problem through negotiation among themselves.
When the governor got the message he ordered the release of
all those involved in the trouble case.
233
There are several types of theft such as that from an
individual's house, garden, or the mountain forest. The
most serious form of theft is from someone's house and is
considered an offense to one's own house and honor. An
offended group that cannot defend their house and keep it
safe from thieves is regarded as weak and timid. When a
family succumbs to such threats they lose face in the
community.
A thief generally steals at night or in the absence
of people, therefore, according to Pashtun tsale (code) a
witness is not necessary. A thief could be freed if he
takes an oath that he has not stolen anything. When a
thief confesses that he has stolen, he is obligated by the
Pashtun tsale (code) to return the stolen good(s) to the
owner as well as to pay double the cost of the article(s)
stolen, either in kind or in cash. The additional amount
is known as pour (indemnity for wrongdoing) in Pashto. The
thief is also obliged to pay the sharm (shame) which is one
sheep and 500 Afs. ($1 = 50 Afs.). The amount of pour
paid is based on the severity of the offense as an atonement.
The sharm is paid so that the victim's reputation (face)
could be saved. The victim slaughters the sheep and invites
the villagers to share in a meal with them. The thief,
together with his close relatives, the members of the village
council, and the village imam also accept the invitation
and the thief offers a public apology for his offense and
wrongdoing.
When a thief confesses but later disagrees with the
owner as to the amount stolen, the owner can receive an
amount greater than the worth of the goods stolen. For
example, if someone was robbed of his rifle, radio and
1,000 Afs. and the thief when captured only confesses to
theft of the rifle and money, the owner could clai~ a
rifle, a radio, two rugs and 5,000 Afs. The robber is
obligated to pay for the goods because he is a confessed
thief. When a thief is killed in the act of theft, no pour
(indemnity for wrongdoing and revenge) or sharm (shame)
is required from the killer. According to Pushtun tsale
or Layar (customary law) it is self-defense and so is
permitted.
When something is stolen by a thief not known to the
victim, the victim may make it known to the villagers that
he will pay a reward, for instance, (1,000 Afs.) to the
individual who identifies the thief. This money is called
za~ (reward) in Pashto. The person who knows the thief's
identity in secret may go to the victim's house and identifY
him. The person who reports the thief to the victim also
tells the owner of the stolen articles that if the thief
took an oath that he had not had stolen anything, then he
will return his reward money. The victim must look into
the case carefully for a motive to the crime. He looks
into his own deeds and sees if he offended the accused in
any manner before. Did he steal anything from him? He
235
asks whether or not the accused was in the village on the
same day that the articles were stolen. If based upon
these assessments the victim thinks that the suspect is
truly guilty and that the reporter is right in his accusa-
tion, he informs the tour (accused) via an intermediary to
return his property with its pour (indemnity for wr~ngdoing)
236
Oath:
An oath is the act of calling upon a deity to bear
witness to the truth of what one says. The most valid and
solemn oath that may be taken by a Muslim in courts is upon
the name of Allah. (Ember and Ember 1977:356, Levy 1971:
258; Roberts 1969:169). But many people in Afghanistan
~
237
2. his/her opinions and saying become ineffective.
3. the color of his/her face and body becomes pale
and ugly.
4. his/her land loses its productivity.
5. his/her livestock loses its productivity and does
not grow naturally.
6. his/her small children die very often.
The act of swearing should not take place either
within the village or in the katsa (farm). The villagers
believe that if a false oath is taken within the village it
may cause a collective illness in the village. Also, when
an oath is being taken in the katsa (farm) it is believed
to reduce the productivity of all the householders' land in
the community. The swearer takes the oath in the legad
(dry river bed) between lower and upper Almara.
Tawda (ordeal):
238
(ordeals) in common use among the Pashtuns: the Zadrans'
and the Tanis.
Zadrans' Tawda:
coin weighs one dollar coin and its area is almost the
same as one dollar coin. The iron piece is called kyar in
Pashto.
2. Seven lines are marked on the earth. The distance
between each line should be about two-thirds meter and each
line should be marked by a pillar for seven steps. Seven
is a symbolic number in Pashtun cosmology.
3. The kyar (iron) should be put in the forge until
it becomes red.
4. Seven pieces of paper sheets equal to the area
of the kyar (iron) should be cut and should be put over the
accused person's right hand.
5. Then the accused is asked to walk seven steps on
the lines marked while holding the kyar (iron) in his hand.
When he takes his seventh step he is permitted to throw the
piece of iron away. Before the accused submits to this
test he takes an oath of innocence. The accused is not
allowed to carry any amulet or sacred artifact from Mecca,
because the people believe that if an individual carries
such things with him, he will not burn and he will become
fire-proof. His hand is bandaged and he is led off to spend
239
the night under guard. In the morning his hand is un-
covered and examined. If there are blisters, he is guilty.
If the individual succeeds in proving his innocence by
showing an unblistered hand, he is entitled to receive a
pour (indemnity) for wrongdoing of 500 Afs. and a sharm
(shame) of one sheep. In addition the accuser is ~equired
Tanis' Tawda:
240
The members of the council either designates a fire-
place or build one. within a room or walled area to avoid
the wind. A fire is set with the specific amount of wood
mentioned above. When the wood burns completely they ask
the accused who was sworn in before to pick up the three
stones from the boiling water. His hand should be ,bandaged
after which he is led off to spend the night under guard.
In the morning his hand is unbandaged and examined. If no
blisters are found on his hand he proves his innocence. In
such cases the accused is entitled to receive a pour
(indemnity) of 500 Afs. and a sharm (shame) of one sheep
from the accuser. The accuser is also obligated to go to
the innocent's house and offer an apology for his
accusation.
Several informants have reported that both tests were
very common among the Mangel, the Tani and the Zadran
tribes until very recently. But they believed increased
education has brought about a drastic change among these
tribes in that ordeals are no longer practiced.
241
asked to submit to tawda (ordeal) to prove their innocence.
The Tani tawda was ordered and one of the council members
supervised the arrangement of the tawda. An informant who
is now a member of the village council told me that all of
the 13 individuals were burned when they picked up the
rocks while four were in fact innocent. The villag~rs
242
and oath taking. After his ordeal several blisters were
found on the accused's hand. When the suspect's hand was
inspected he himself also acknowledged that he was the
thief.
This custom of taking an oath and submission to an
ordeal is dying. Until very recently the villager~
believed that only the criminal burns when the tawda (orderu)
is carried out. The theft case (Case No.5) in Tani and
many other such exceptions to the tawda (ordeal) proved that
it was not a valid test. Therefore, the test has been
losing its popularity as a means of adjudication. The
higher the level of public education the more they were
convinced that anyone who touches something hot will burn.
This custom is taking another form now. The person
who is "accused" of a crime is called tor (charged of a
crime) and an "innocent" individual is called spean. When
an individual becomes accused of a crime such as theft, the
accuser, based upon the Pashtun customary laws, has the
right to ask a close relative, a spean (an innocent) of
the tor (accused) to take an oath testifying to the
accused's innocence and that he has no knowledge of the
item that was to have been stolen. The accused is supposed
to swear that he is not guilty.
I believe that another important reason for this
change in the form of oath taking is due to the influence
of Islam. Islam and the Pashtun tradition both put a great
deal of importance on taking an oath.
243
Case No.7: Missing Merchandize
Place: Paktia Province
Date: 1964
A man (A) put some of his commercial goods in another
man's (B's) truck while he himself was with the driver on
the way toward his home. A did not inform the driver
... (B)
about the goods in the truck because he was selling them
illegally and did not want to pay the tax. The truck
arrived at A's house near town and A took his baggage and
stuff and went to his home. After several months A came
to the driver who happened to be the owner of the truck and
told him that a portion of his commercial stuff worth
30,000 Afs. was missing. The "poor" truck owner became
outraged and told A that first of all he diu not inform him
about the goods in the truck and did not pay anything for
carrying it so how could he say that the merchandise was
stolen and that B is responsible for it. One day while the
truck driver was on the road, A and his brother threatened
the driver with their rifles and forced him to stop the
truck. The driver was taken to A's village. When the
driver's brother got the message, he came to A's village.
As a guest he was well cared for with warmth and was respect-
fully served a good meal. The village jirgah (council) was
convened and they discussed the trouble case with the driver's
brother. The driver's brother told the jirgah that he did
not know anything about the loss of the merchandise. A asked
244
him that he but not the driver shoUhl swear that they did
not take the goods or else pay the value of it which was
)0,000 Afs. A knew that the driver's brother, because of
his prestige in the community, would not take the oath.
The driver's brother reacted as expected, but told the
jirgah (council of elders) that he did not know anything
~
Land:
Whenever a dispute occurs over a piece of land the
maraka (village council) will get together on their ovm
volition or they will be informed by a messenger sent by
one or both of the disputing parties. The maraka questions
the parties about the nature and the reason for the con-
£rontation. At this moment both sides would claim that the
land is theirs and that they have inherited it from their
fathers. In order to £ind out to which party the land
really belongs, the council of elders begin their inquiry.
The maraka may search for in£ormation as to who received
the last tspora (yields). They ask the people within the
village and those o£ the adajacent communities. Even i£
most people questioned for instance, say group A had the
last tspora (yields), the members o£ group B may still
declare their rights and claim at least a part of the land
or the whole field. In such a case if group B claims the
right of ownership over the whole land or a part of it and
assuming group A denies their claim, based upon the Pashtun
land tsali (codes) members of tribe B are obligated to take
an oath in the presence of the council members and other
villagers. The number o£ the people who may be asked to
take an oath depends upon the value and area of the land.
There are two types of oath taking in cases involving
land: (1) in a situation where two parties (tribes A and
B) claim the right of ownership over a small part of an
arable and ferti~plot of land, such as a claim covering
one fourth of 20 jaribs arable land, an old and higher
status member of the claimant party is required by Pashtun
tsali (codes) to take the holy QUran under his arm and walk
246
across the portion of the land they claim is theirs. In
Pashto this type of an oath taking is called bread (carrying
holy Quran under the arm). In situations like this the
oath taker is not obligated to swear to God's name that
their claim to the land is just. The individual merely
carries the Quran under his arm and crosses the po~tion of
land which is claimed. The Pashtuns, however, consider
this to be an act of ser prykawol (cutting of someone's
head off by the opposing party).
In a situation where one party claims a big part of
another party's land, for instance, one-half of 100 jaribs,
or the whole farm due to its value, then seven persons from
the claimant group are required to take an oath by the
maraka (council of elders). After the oath is taken the
land belongs to the swearers.
If the land is nonarable and no evidence is available
to indicate who harvested the last yield, equal numbers of
elderly individuals with similar social prestige from both
sides are obligated to swear to God's name that their claim
to the land is just. Upon the oath, the maraka will divide
the land into two equal parts. This reflects strongly the
PashtlJ.n belief in compromise which is embodied in the
expression sulha P.Q. nimayi, which literally means "peace
is in dividing a given property in half."
Very often in less important trouble cases, such as
a minor damage to a rice field or cutting down an apple
247
tree, witnesses help in conflict resolution. The maraka
may ask the witnesses about the incident and then, based
upon their information, make a decision.
248
A man (A) owned a piece of land adjacent to and
including a forested hill. A agreed to sell the land to B
who assumed that the hill was included in the deal.
Because of this false assumption a dispute arose and
initially A denied his deal with B. Later he acknowledged
the sale of the land, but not the hill. ,
The maraka was called upon. B brought up a legal
point that anyone who claimed that the land belonged to
him was his son. According to the Pashtun customary law,
arable land is basic and mountain land and forest are
secondary phenomena attached to it. Two ideas were implied
in B's statement: (1) as A, himself acknowledged, B had
the right of ownership over the land; it means that he had
the right of ownership over the primary phenomenon which
was the land; (2) B claimed that the right of ownership
over the primary phenomenon (land) and declared that the
secondary phenomenon (mountain forest) was attached to it.
therefcre, belong to him also. Moreover, he claimed that
the only person who could claim the mountain would be his
son. According to the Pashtun custom while the father is
alive the son cannot have the right of ownership over any
part of his father's property. When the maraka heard his
legal point, they decided that the land and the mountain
forest should go to B. In this way A lost the case.
In this connection, I must mention two points: First
in many incidents a logical, legal and legitimate point
may become a good reason to win the case without taking an
oath or leaving the arena to continue the fight. Second,
when an individual wants to sell his land he is required
by the Pashtun customary laws to inform his close relatives
about the case although in some cases his relatives might
not be his shaf (having land near to another person's land).
",
Mountain:
The disputes over mountain sides and their related
forests most often occur between or among tribes. The
procedures for getting together the members of a maraka
(village council) are almost the same as in other disputes.
When the maraka convenes the members inquire about the
nature of the case by asking why. for example, group A or
B claims the right of ownership over the mountain or forest
and what their basis of argumentation is. Either of the
two groups who present the following reasons for ownership
may be considered as the owner of whole or part of the
mountain or forest.
1. According to the Pashtun tsali (customary laws)
when water comes from a portion of a mountain and goes to
an individual's (or group's) land or passes through the
land, that portion of the mountain belongs to the owner of
the land.
250
2. The banda is a single hut Inade of stones, mud,
wood and branches in the mountain where the lumbermen or
herders and some or all members of their families live
during the summer time. It can also validate ownership of
the mountain. Lumbermen and herders (sing. shpoon) move
during the summer into the mountains and make banda
(summer huts in the mountain). When the marakachian
(council members) look for the evidence and they go to the
mountain and find one or several bandas, they ask who owns
them. The people who own the bandas (huts), according to
the Pashtun tsali (codes), have the right of ownership over
the mountain and forest as well.
3. Very often springs in the mountains are surrounded
with small plots of cultivable land. Based upon the Pashtun
tsali (laws), the people who own the spring and the
surrounding arable land own the mountain and forest.
4. Names of mountains are also very important in
this respect. Most often mountains are called by the names
of their inhabitants and ovmers such as a tribal name.
All the above mentioned items indicate ownership.
When tribe A presents one or several of the above mentioned
reasons for the ownership and tribe B also claims ownership,
but fails to give evidence as such, tribe A may have the
mountain at the price of an oath taking. The number of
people who must take the oath depends on the value and
importance of the mountain. For example, since almost all
251
PLEASE NOTE:
This page not included in
material received from the
Graduate School. Filmed
as received.
UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS
mountain and forest. Consequently, they decided that the
area holding the head waters that fed Tanis' village and
passed through their fields should go to the Tanis and the
head waters which feed the Zadrans' village and farms
should go to the Zadrans. Moreover, they decided that the
top of the mountain range should constitute the border
between the opposing tribes. The decision seemed logical
and the opposing parties were satisfied and accepted it
and thus, peace was accomplished and the prisoners were
released.
253
several bandas or tsapari (huts) in the mountains. They
found out the huts belong to the Ali Mohammad Khels. The
tukhum took this point as reliable evidence and made their
decision. They asked for 50 persons from Ali Mohammad-Khel
to take an oath that their claim to the mountain and forest
was just. Fifty persons were sworn in by the members of
.~
Division of Mountain:
The question of the division of mountains is also
problematical for the owners and on some occasions leads to
a confrontation among the sub-branches and lineages.
254
Division of a mountain can be based on these principles as
follow:
1. The number of individuals in the subtribes and
lineages.
2. The number of households in the subtribes and
lineages.
~
255
lineage or sublineage) owns. All of the branches consider
themselves shaf (neighbor) to the land and all claim the
same right and equal portion of the land. It is the custom
that when the father dies, his land is divided among his
sons equally. When a neighboring plot of land is purchased
or sold all brothers have an equal right in its purchase
and/or division.
Second, the foothills adjacent to the arable foothills
should be divided based upon the logi (hearth or household).
This is the part of the mountain over which there has not
been a previous dispute. It is the rule among the Pashtuns
that if any kind of dispute occurs over this type of land,
the householders in the village are responsible for the
expenses. Therefore, when the time comes to divide it, it
is done by the number of logi (households).
Third, the part of the mountain which is situated on
the borders, adjacent to other tribes is very often in danger
of invasion. Because individuals defend their territory the
border land is divided on an individual basis.
256
with him. In a situation in which the borrower agrees upon
this method of settlement and if there are at least two
witnesses and both of them acknowledge and swear in favor
of A, then B is obligated by the Pashtun customary law to
pay A the amount the witnesses say, either in cash or in
kind. When the lender sends an intermediary to th~ debtor
asking him to resolve the dispute peacefully and the
borrower does not want to settle the dispute, then according
to Pashtun traditional law the lender is permitted to offend
the borrower in any manner he wants to, except kill him.
For instance, he can kidnap the debtor or one of.his close
male relatives until his relatives come and pay the money
and settle the dispute. He can likewise capture the
borrower's camel or an ox and bring it to his village or he
can damage his farm or garden. But if the lender, prior to
informing the borrower via an intermediary, offends the
debtor, the lender must pay sharm (shame) to the borrower
upon the resolution of their dispute.
257
value of a human being each major portion of the body is
worth 15,000 Afs.
Eyes:
When an individual injures another's eyes and the
person becomes blind, Ute offender is required to pay a pour
(indemnity) of 15,000 Afs. Also, he has to make a 'com-
pensation of what is called topaki or medical expenses.
There is a limit to the topaki (medical expenses) that
may be claimed by the plaintiff. If the amount claimed by
the plaintiff is )0,000 Afs. or less, he is entitled to
have the money without swearing. If the money claimed by
the injured is more than )0,000 Afs. he must take an oath.
In the latter case, the culprit customarily would take the
amount of money claimed and put it on the open Quran and
would ask the injured to collect the money. This is con-
sidered a type of swearing.
In addition, offender and his close relatives together
with the marakachian (members of the council of elders) and
one or two religious persons such as the imam and sayeds
have to go to the injured person's house and ask for for-
giveness. This is called nanawat (taking asylum). The
offender is also obligated by the Pashtun tsali (laws) to
take a goat or sheep as sharm (shame) to the plaintiff's
house. The plaintiff slaughters and cooks the animal and
invites the important and high status individuals of the
community to let them know that the parties have resolved
the dispute and the honor of the offended was not damaged.
258
When an individual blinds another individual in one
eye, he is obliged to pay a pour of 7,500 Afs., topaki
(medical expenses) and sharm and perform nanawat. Although
a person can work with one eye and it may not affect one's
sight drastically it is worth one-eighth of the whole body
of a human being because it blemishes the face.
Nose:
Amputation of an individual's nose or a serious injury
on a person's nose is considered a great offense by the
Pashtuns. There are historical, physical and social reasons
for this seriousness. According to my informants in ancient
times, when a Pashtun woman committed adultery and it was
known to her relatives and husband, the woman's father,
brother or husband would cut off her nose and ears and would
break her legs and shave her head. They would do the same
to the adulterer but were not allowed to kill either the
man or the woman. In situations like this the killing of
the adulterer or adulteress is now the common practice among
the people. However, they no longer break the legs and cut
off the nose and ears. I believe the change from amputation
to killing is attributable to the law of Islam which
requires that adulterer and adulteress both should be killed.
This traditional method of dealing with adultery is
illustrated in an expression still common among the villagers.
When a mother gets angry at her daughter, she threatens her
with "May your nose and ears be cut!" Similarly, when a
259
father gets angry at his son, he says, "I will break your
legs if you repeat this action."
The position of the nose as a central and prominent
part of the face is self evident. This is the main reason
why Pashtun tsali (customary laws) give more importance to
the nose. Even at the present time when a mother goes out
'-
to hunt for a beautiful bride for her son, she discusses
with him upon return the quality of the nose's prominence
and height in addition to the eyes and the hair. A woman
who lacks the attributes of a prominent and high nose,
black eyes and long hair lacks beauty and consequently does
not attract the attention of the man. Thus, by the punish~
260
Teeth:
Pashtun tsali (customary laws) define special punish-
ments for tooth injury. According to these laws each tooth
or group of teeth have different values depending on the
positions and functions they have. The Middle dari
(incisors) from the upper and lower ~ (jaws) are, the
most important because lack of them makes the mouth ugly
and affects the speech apparatus as well as mastication.
For each one of these four teeth, the Pashtun customary law
requires a "fine" of 5,000 Afs. Each of the remaining four
other incisors are worth 2,500 Afs. For breaking or ex-
tracting any of the four canines, the defendant is "fined"
2,000 Afs. Since all of the premolars and molars are not
visible and do not affect speech each one costs 1,000 Afs.
Hands:
Both hands are considered to be worth one-fourth the
value of a human being. Being right-handed is regarded as
respectful among the Pashtuns. Since the right hand is
more useful and considered important, if an individual's
right hand is broken or injured seriously,it is worth
10,000 Afs. The left hand is worth 5,000 Afs. but if a
person is left-handed, it costs 10,000 Afs. and the right
hand 5,000 Afs.
Since right-handedness is encouraged from childhood
the number of left-handed individuals is very small in the
country in general and among the Pashtuns in particular.
261
Very often being left-handed is considered bad manners and
it is discouraged.
Payment for damage incurred to the fingers, is
interesting anthropologically. Obviously in the process
of human and culture evolution the role of thumb is very
important. The Pashtuns have realized the function..... and
importance of this digit and they have given great value
to the thumb in their traditional laws. Accordingly, a
thumb is regarded as one-half of the value of one hand.
Therefore, it is worth J,750 Afs. The finger next to the
thumb, shahadata 6 (index finger) based upon its function
and position is worth 2,500 Afs. The third, fourth and
fifth fingers, because of their functions and their positions
as well as their cosmetic value, have different values
ranging from 2,000, 1,500 and 1,000 Afs. respectively.
Feet:
Both feet are also considered one of the four major
categories of the body. Together they value 15,000 Afs.
There are three categories of leg injuries (goudawol):
(1) tound goud, (2) wouch goud and (J) ~ goud. When an
individual's one leg is injured or broken to the extent
that the person still has partial use of it and his physical
appearance is not deformed, it is called tound goud (alive
lame). This kind of injury in addition to paying topaki
(medical expenses), sharm (shame) and going nanawat to the
injured horne for asking an apology, costs the wrongdoer
one-eighth of the value of a man's pour. If an individual's
leg is injured to the extent that he or she cannot use it
but the person's physical appearance was not drastically
deformed, it is called wouch goud (dead lame). When an
individual amputates a foot it is called Q!~ goud
(amputated lame). This type is the most serious of all.
"
For the last two types of injury, one leg costs the offender
one-eighth of the human value. Several of my informants
told me that if a person becomes wouch goud (dead lame) or
~ gQud (amputated lame), in addition to the other social
and economic obligations such as the payment o£ topaki
(medication); sharm (shame) and going nanawat the amputee
demands one-hal£ of a human being value, which is )0,000
A£s. Evidel1ce indicates that very often when an individual
becomes wouch goud (dead lame) or ~ houd (amputated lame),
his or her relatives may seek revenge. To the Pashtuns
breaking someone's bone is considered a very serious offense
and the offended party may not become satisfied unless
revenge is sought.
The reasons for considering the foot trouble cases
to be very serious seem to lie in geographical, ecological
and social factors. For people who live in the mountains,
chop trees, make lumber and walk with their caravans from
one city to another, or from one country to another, feet
are very important organs for survival. Therefore, lameness
is regarded as a major debilitating defect to the Pashtuns.
Consequently, according to some of the Pashtun tribes,
making a person completely lame costs the offender one-half
of the value of a human being .
264
of land which was estimated to be less than one jarib
(1 jarib = 2,000 m2 ) occurred between them. Each side was
claiming the right of ownership over the disputed land.
One side (A) attempted to cultivate wheat on the farm before
settling the dispute while the two (A) brothers were plowing
the land. Their cousin (B) with his two adult sons carne to
the scene and asked the two brothers to stop plowing. They
did not stop and a fight ensued. Bls wife hit a man from
(A) with a shovel. The man's leg was broken and his hip
was dislocated and as a result he was wouch goud (dead lame).
Several marakas (council of elders) discussed the trouble
case but to date, the injured party has not been satisfied
and has not accepted any resolution because of the severity
of the injury. Very often when an injury is a broken bone,
no matter which bone it may be, the offended party may seek
revenge as they do in case of homicide. After the first
fight, they fought two more times, once when I was in the
field. Each time A's brother and their sons tried to break
someone's leg from the opposite side, but they have been
unsuccessful. They are still seeking revenge.
In the case of other injuries, the amount of pour
(indemnity), topaki (medical expenses) sharm (shame) and
nanawat (taking asylum to the offended party's house) depend
upon the nature, size and position of the injury on the
body of the injured. The length, width and depth of the
injury is measured by the marakachian {members of the
council of elders) with the nail of the shahadata9 (index)
finger. If the area of the injury is equal to the area of
the shahadata finger and if its depth is also like the
finger nail and it is an overt or manifested injury, it
costs the wrongdoer 150 Afs. If the injury can be covered
or veiled with cloths and/or it is hidden, for each nail
size injury the offender may pay 100 Afs. For the covered
and uncovered injuries the assailant, in addition to paying
pour (indemnity), is required to compensate for the
medication expenses.
When an individual takes his peashkawza or statawah
(knife) out of its cover, opens it and threatens another
individual but does not injure him, he is obligated to pay
a pour (fine) of 1,000 Afs. When a person takes his rifle,
loads it and threatens another person but does not shoot
there is nothing required to be paid. But if he takes his
rifle and shoots, even if he misses the individual, he is
obliged to pay a pour of 1,000 Afs. and one sheep sharm
(shame). It should be pointed out that this type of action
very rarely happens among the Pashtuns. A Pashtun most
often carries a rifle on his shoulder, a pistol around his
neck and a stawah (knife) in his waist because weapons are
considered ornamental for men. But very rarely does he
shoot or injure another individual. When a man takes his
rifle from his shoulder to load it, or when he takes his
knife out of its cover, he must use them or else lose face
and be called a coward.
266
Tsali for Resolving Farm and Animal Damages:
($1 = 50 Afs.)
268
ment of the girl's parents in the past, and if the parents
did not want to reconciliate, the man's death was the
solution for the trouble case because he offended the
girl's father and family's honor. Moreover, in this case
the girl was called ghazh wahalai (the one who was engaged
forcefully) and nobody wanted to marry her. Presently
"
homicide is not allowed in these cases. However, the girl's
parents certainly may marry their daughter tc another
person, most often to one of her father's kinsmen or in a
different political community or tribe far away from their
own and the offender's villages so that the girl should be
out of their daily sight. In addition, the wrongdoer is
obliged to pay an indemnity of 500 Afs., called da bad
Las pour (indemnity for wrongdoing) and one sheep sharm
(shame) and go nanawat (taking asylum) to the home of the
girl's parents with several of his relatives, marakachian
(members of the council of elders) and the imam to ask an
apology for his wrongdoing. In addition, the man should
deny his claim in the presence of all these people.
In situations where the parties want reconciliation',
the man who wants to marry the girl and his relatives may
marry two of their sisters or daughter to the girl's close
relatives, very often her brothers, as an exchange marriage.
One of these two girls should be "married." The term
"married" in this respect is different from the actual
marriage. The boy's father, for instance, may declare
publicly that he marry one of his daughters to a cousin and
then marry the same girl to the other party's close
relative. This "married" girl is equal to the girl whom
the man wants to marry and the second girl is a payment of
pour (indemnity for wrongdoing) for offending the girl's
father and his relatives' honor.
27.0
The girl's brothers left the village and the girl is
still unmarried. No one knows what will happen in the
future with regard to this particular case.
A Woman Homicide:
When a woman is murdered and the reason is adultery,
~
271
Adultery, Rape and Abduction:
Due to the very strict rules among the Pashtuns,
adultery, rape and abduction trouble cases are very rare.
However, there are tsali (customary laws) for resolving
those cases. When a girl is forcefully abducted by a man
from her parents' house and she does not complain o~ refuse,
her father and brothers are responsible for killing the
man and the woman. If she is abducted from her husband's'
home, the husband will murder his wife and the man. In
situations where the abductor happens to be murdered and
the abductee still lives in her lover's horne, she will be
married to her lover's brother. In this case, Pashtuns
tsali (customary laws) allow only the adulterer to be slain.
If the woman's father, brother or husband kills the second
man (woman's lover's brother), the woman will marry the
third brother or his kinsman. Since there does not seem
to be an end to the trouble case, it may result in a feud
or warfare, as the tribal customary laws regarded permissible
only the killing of the woman and her first lover with
whom she escaped.
When a man and a woman are caught in one bed (if it
is not rape and a forceful act), both are to be murdered
on the spot. If only one person is slain, the killer is
regarded as a murderer because, in essence, according to
the Islamic shari~, (laws) and Pashtuns tsali (customary
laws) both individuals were outlawed and guilty and
accordingly liable to be killed. Leaving one alive confuses
272
the situation and results in suspicion as to the real
motive of the slaying. In a situation where a man asks a
woman to go to bed with him and she refuses, or if she is
raped, the man is liable to be slain.
Among Pashtuns and other Afghans adultery, abduction,
and rape are considered major offenses and sins. Thus, in
order to make the offenses hard and impractical, the
Pashtuns tsali (rules and laws) permit killing of up to
seven men from the offender's side. When a man abducts a
woman and both parties want reconciliation, the pour
(indemnity for the wrongdoing) for this action, in addition
to two sheep as sharm (shame) and nanawat, is two
women. One of these women should be marosha or konishkale
("married").
273
In situations where a person slays another person and
he and his relatives want reconciliation and resolution to
the trouble case and/or the opposite party is ~Jor and
does not have the power for revenge, the marakachian (council
of elders) may convene to resolve the trouble case peace-
fully. When the maraka (council of elders) make a decision
satisfactory to the both sides a nake or a khoon (blood
price) of 60,000 Afs. should be paid by the slayer's party.
Moreover, the murderer in addition to "Pashto" sharm
(shame ), two sheep and going nanawat (taking asylum
to the slain's horne), must provide the other party with an
unmarried girl.
Upon the resolution of a homicide case, if the
opposed parties want further reconciliation after the
decision made of the maraka (council of elders) the council
members construct a set of stone tsali (pillars) equal to
the number of slain individuals from both sides. If there
were only one murder case they make only one pillar. Then
one person from each party is asked to destroy the pillars
one by one alternately. Finally, one pillar remains extra
representing one more individual from the opposing party.
After the payment of the nake (blood price), one relative
of the victim customarily may approach the pillar and
destroy it. This act signifies that the dispute is over,
the trouble case is resolved and the parties do not want
further revenge.
274
The roles of marriage in these cases are very signi-
ficant. On some occasions the marakachian (the members
of the council of elders) may advise both sides (or the
opposing parties themselves may decide) to exchange
daughters or sisters. Although a homicide case may be
involved and it is very hard for the slain man's p~rty to
tolerate the situation without revenge, the marriage ties
may bring the two inimical parties together and- make them
close relatives and afines rather than enemies.
275
six members from other subtribes of the Zadran stock, two
men were invited from the village of Almara. Hundreds of
people were waiting to hear what they had decided. It was
an important case because based upon the decision of that
tukhum (Pashtun supreme court) the custom of zhagh could
be prohibited. An elderly member of the tukhum wa~ asked
by the council members to announce their decision to the
parties involved as well as to the public. The experienced
elderly man raised his cane and pointed it toward the
public and said, "My dear fellow villagers do you know who
is responsible for the murder? The individual pays for the
negative consequences who slays other people on behalf of
his relative," he repeated himself twice. In this manner
the trouble case was partially resolved and the slain man's
relatives understood that the cousin was responsible for
the death.
This trouble case and the maraka (meeting of the
council of elders) is very well-known historically. It is
important because first an ancient rule was abolished and
a new one was introduced. Traditionally a relatively distant
kinsman could take revenge even though the victim's father
or brothers were alive. The new rule says only close
relatives can take revenge. Second, the custom of zhagh
was abolished. It was a very common practice among the
Pashtuns that if an individual for some reason was not able
to take revenge he could pay another individual to take
revenge f~~ him. I was told that in recent years several
276
individuals who were rich and thirsty for power would give
money to other persons and ask them to slay their opponents
for them. Because of this practice, innocent persons were
occasionally slain.. After the man was slain the rich would
make thezhagh (announcement) that he was responsible for
the slaughter.
Since these customs were very disruptive, the decision
made by the above mentioned maraka was accepted as a rule.
Presently no one except the slain individual's close
relative or wali (guardian) can take revenge. Also, no one
can murder another individual on behalf of the guilty
person. This rule also conforms with Islamic law.
Generally speaking two opposing types of resolution
of conflicts have been discussed in this essay: violent
resolution and peaceful resolution. Under the former
category the question of feuding and warfare, their scopes
and causes were explained. I define feuding as a state of
recurring hostilities between families or groups of kinsmen
or families in two different political communities, usually
motivated by a desire to avenge an offense-whether insult,
injury, deprivation or death - against a member of the
group. The most characteristic feature of the feud among
the Pashtuns is that responsibility for revenge is carried
out by the close members of the kin group. Warfare is
defined as armed combat between the political communities.
It is usually premeditated and organized by the leaders.
277
It is a large-scale confrontation where a short-term use
of force is enacted in order to achieve a limited objective
such as the acquisition of goods, animals or other forms
of wealth, land, forest belonging very often to a neighbor-
ing community. Warfare differs from feuding in that it
can more readily be terminated, temporarily or permanently,
by recognized methods, such as truce or negotiated settle-
ment.
Under the latter category I described the settlement
of conflict through mediation, arbitration, intermediaries,
negotiation and taking oaths. I have to note that I
discovered two very important and efficient ways of conflict
resolution among the Pashtuns of southern Afghanistan; (1)
Marakachian (village council) resolves the trouble cases
through arbitration. They do not control the department
of police in the village and do not have courts at the
tribal level. They developed their own way of using force
which is taking baramta (money or other form of wealth) to
encourage the parties involved to accept the decision made
by the maraka (council of elders). (2) Oaths and ordeals
278
one says or to witness that one sincerely intends to do
what one says. The Pashtuns believe that a false oath
ruins one's descendants' honor, causes bad luck, and
illness among the members of the family. reduces human
reproduction as well as farm yields. An ordeal was defined
as a "primitive" means of determining guilt or innocence
""
279
FOOTNOTES TO CHAPTER VII
1
In recent years an important controversy has
arisen concerning the extent to which different lexemic
categories and grammatical. rules produce habituall~ incom-
patible modes of thought among peoples who belong to
different language communities. At the center of this
controversy is the comparison made by the anthropological
linguist Bengamin Lee Whorf (1956) between American
Indian languages and the Indo-European family of languages
to which English belongs. According to Whorf, when two
language systems have radically different lexemic and
grammatical structures, their respective speakers live
in wholly different thought-worlds. Even such fundamental
categories as space and time are experienced differently
as a result of the linguistic "molds" which constrain our
cognitive process. Whorf has written that:
The forms of a person's thought are
controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of
which he is unconscious. These patterns
are the unperceived intricate systematizations
of his own language--shown really enough
by candid comparison and contrast with
other languages, especially those of a
different linguistic family. His
thinking itself is in a language--in
English, in Sanskrit, Lin Pashto, in
Persia~, in Chinese. And every language
culturally oriented the forms and
categories by which the personality not
only communicates, but also analyzes
nature, notices or neglects types of
relationship and phenomena, channels
280
his reasoning, and builds the house of
his consciousness (1956:252).
281
11 Although one Afghani is the basic monetary unit in
the country, when the marakachian (arbitrators) talk about
the payment of a pour (indemnity for wrongdoing) for an
offense the smallest unit of money they use is twenty (shffi)
Afs. I believe that the reasons for this relies on the
fact that one Afgh~ni (Af.) has very little value. This
formula is also applied with Reyal in Iran. Iranians very
often talk in terms of Tomons (20) and not in terms of
Reyal.
282
CHAPTER VIII
28;
comply with the decision made 'by the council of elders
may lose his baramta (guarantee paid to the council
members) .
The peasants and the tribal peoples that are found
in the southern foothills of the Sulaman range do not
retain their tribal institutions through ignorance,._ but
as a stable and successful adaptation to the natural and
social environment in which they find themselves. The
Pushtuns' live in village clusters, and their face-to-face
communication, their common mosque, their common dikes
and water channel systems (which are behind the power of
an individual or a family to establish and manage them
and requires group actions), their system of sUbsistence
economy (cutting forests and agriculture, which require
fellow villagers' help), their lumber trade with Pakistan
(which due to the presence of brigands on their way
necessitated a large caravan of camels and movement of a
great number of people as a group with their caravan)
have enabled them to develop their own way of controlling
their society's affairs and of developing a way of living
adaptable to their every day life. Moreover, they have
their own political, administrative and historical back-
ground as well as their own communication and transportation
systems. The lack of good means of transportation, good
roads, Afghanistan's cold and severe winters, the great
distance between the capital and other major cities where
the judiciary, administrative and main police departments
284
were situated from the Pushtuns' communities, the strictness
of absolute monarchs, the bad conditions of the prisons,
the cruelty and tyranny of prison guards, the lack of
sufficient financial support to live in the major cities
and of hiring professional lawyers for litigation, and
some other ecological requirements have enabled th~
285
suggested to King Mohummad Zaher Shah (disposed by a coup
d'etat on July 17, 1973 led by General Mohammad Daud)
that the time was ripe for democracy. The now desposed
king accepted the proposal but because of the fear of
his cousin's popularity among the people, he asked him
to resign. Prime Minister Mohummad Daud resigned l .~nd
was replaced by a commoner, Dr. Mohummad Yousuf. The
Afghan government then planned to establish a new
political system entitled the "Afghan New Democracy"
with a distinct separation of legislative, executive and
judicial powers.
In fact, the introduction of the "Afghan New
Democracy" was the adoption of a Western political system
with most of its characteristics. The executive, judicial
and legislative powers were separated. A national election
system was set up and all of the representatives for the
Common House were elected by the people, as is the custom
in many of the Western countries. Western lawyers were
the advisors for the Afghan Constitutional Committee.
Most of the Western countries' laws were translated into
Pushto and Dari and were incorporated into Afghan law.
Meanwhile, newly-organized police departments, courts and
prosecutors' offices were established throughout the country.
When reviewing the anthropological as well as the
sociological literature regarding social and political
change, without any doubt one may find many examples of
negative instances. In general, there seems to be a
286
tendency for more such examples of negative instances.
Evidently, social scientists do not usually become aware
of inflUencing factors except when they act as barriers
to acceptance or influence the situations in a negative
way. Also, the most frequent role of social scientists
is that of problem-solvers. They consequently very
....
often look for significant barriers and negative results.
The cases such as "In the Wake of a Wheel: Introduction
of the Wagon t a the Papago Indians of Southern Aris ana, "
by Wesley L. Bliss (1961: 2J- JJ), "Steel Axes for Stone
Age Australians" by Lauriston Sharp (1961:69-90), and
"The Wells that Failed: .An Attempt to Establish a
Stable Water Supply in Viru Valley, Peru" by Allan R. Holmberg
(1961:11J-12J) are good examples of this sort.
In contrast it must be pointed out that in spite
of its corruption, many difficiencies and negative effects,
the introduction of the "Afghan New Democracy" and the
endorsement of the new Constitution by King Zahir Shah
on October 1, 1964, had many positive aspects. The new
Constitution allowed the freedom of speech and the press,
called for a two-house parliament and an independent
judiciary, and barred members of the royal family from
serving as Prime Minister, cabinet members, the chief
justice, or parliament members. The king appointed the
Prime Minister who had command of the armed forces
(Yousefzai 1974:167-18)).
287
On the other hand, to look at the negative side of
the "Afghan New Democracy" and the adapt ion of Western
Nations' laws and political models, we can find many
conflicts between the Western models and the Afghan
social values and traditional tribal laws and codes.
It seems to me that the Westerners' (even the Turks' " and
Indians') laws, from which Afghans' new alws stemmed,
have developed under different social, historical,
ecological, technological and ideological circumstances.
Being not fit for the Afghans affairs, the Western political
model and laws resulted in many conflicts. According to
the new Constitution the people are forced to resolve
their disputes and trouble cases based upon the new laws.
The police departments are involved in disputes. The
people are obliged to go to the courts when they are
mandated by the law. They are supposed to hire lawyers
for their defense. Outlaws are sentenced to jail and are
put in prison. According to the new constitution every
Afghan has the right to go to the polls to vote and
elect his or her representatives. All these events are
new to the nation as a whole. Out of 29 cases analyzed
in this dissertation 22 (75.86% of the total sample) were
referred to the jirgah, maraka or tukhum. Only one case,
of the total cases referred to the council of elders,
was not resolved. The reason for this was a broken bone
(leg) and the injured man and his relatives wanted revenge.
Five (17.24%) of the 41 cases were first referred to the
288
Table 9 Key: R = Resolved
U = Unresolved
Coh = Cohesion
Cf = Conflict
R U R U Coh Cf Coh Cf
9 Disputed Land
Sale x x
10 Confrontation
Over the Tsate x x x
(Table 9 continued) Key: R = Resolved
U = Unresolved
Coh = Cohesion
Cf :=: Conflict
Case Trouble Case Maraka Reported to Resolution of Resolution of
No. Convened the Government Conflict Through Conflict Through
Maraka the Government
R U R U Coh Cf Coh Cf
R U R U Coh Cf Coh Cf
20 POlygany and
N
Conflict Between
\() the First Wife
t--"
and the Husband x x
21 Conflict Over Land x x
22 Conflict over Up-
rooted Trees x x
23 Prisoner Death in
the Prison and
Seeking Revenge x x
24 Conflict Over the
Wood Price x x
25 A Fight Over Bus
Fare x x
I
26 A Death by an
Accident x x
27 Confrontation
Over Marriage x x
(Table 9 continued) Key: R = Resolved
U = Unresolved
Coh = Cohesion
Cf = Conflict
Case Trouble Case Maraka Reported to Resolution of Resolution of
No. Convened the Government Conflict Through Conflict Through
Maraka the Government
R U R U Coh Cf Coh Cf
28 Conflict Over
Buying Land From
N x
a Sick Man x
'"
N
29 Homosexuality and
Feud x
government but were not resolved there. Then the same
cases were resolved by the council of elders.
To a Pushtun, the involvement of the police, and the
judges or the reporting on a trouble case to the pOlice
and going to court on the part of the plaintiff and the
defendant, indicates that the individual was weak, ,timid.
Moreover, when the wrongdoer goes to jail, and is being
penalized and fined by the court, it does not resolve
the dispute but rather intensifies the opposition and
enmity between the parties involved. The data from the
village indicate, the greater the utilization of external
legal tradition in rural communities the more intensive
is internal conflict (see Table 9). One of the reasons
that could account for this is putting the offender in
prison. In the case of an offender who is the head of
the family, or the major source of income for the family
and is sentenced to jail, this situation affects the
whole family's economy, thus increasing the sense of
hostility between the families. Before 1964 among the
Pushtun the custom of electing their representatives for
the two-house parliament was an established pattern, that
is to say, each elective region consisting of two or
more tribes took turns and sent their representative to
the parliament. For example, if an elective region involved
four tribes (A, B, C, and D), the first tribe A in its
tUrn would assign their representative, secondly tribe B,
thirdly tribe C and finally D (as among people of Gardez,
293
the capital of Puktya). After the new Constitution became
effective on October 1, 1964, the traditional PQshtun
pattern of taking turns regarding the electing of
representatives was abolished and formal elections were
established. Members of each tribe tried to win the
blection and send their own representative whenever- they
could win the election. This situation brought about
many hostilities, and conflicts among the tribes ensued.
Based on this reason even affines who are members of the
different tribes situated in the same elective region
do not like each other, and so broke off their very
intimate relations. Just as in decades before, the
problems of language and ethnicity were once again stirred
up (see cases #17, 18 and 19).
Afghanistan is a nation with many different ethnic
groups and at least two major languages both of them
defined by the Constitution of 1977 as national and
official languages. The questions of ethnicity and
language unfortunately have been serious problems for
the country and national integration for decades. The
recent conflict situation of external and internal laws
has intensified the situation. The primary reason for
these conflicts between linguistic groups and ethnic
groups are not ethnicity and language. The fundamental
reason seems to be demand for scarce resources such as,
official governmental, judiciary and parliamentary positions.
Collier has said that:
294
Researchers interested in political
Land lega~ processes have postulated
that competition and conflict are
endemic in social life because culturally
defined prizes are such that there is
never enough to go around. Several
researchers have noted how rivals for
power and prestige may break rules or
invoke the legal system to achieve a
particular advantage or to ruin a
c ompeti tor (19'75: 124-125) .
My data support Collier's and others' views in
this particular respect. A group of elites who generally
belonging to the middle or upper classes and who have
come from the rural areas in order to maintain or achieve
higher statues often stirs issues about language and
ethnicity. These are some Kabul University graduates
and other individuals with foreign training. These
persons are relatively well educated and have achieved
middle class positions in the State system but want
upward mobility. To achieve their goals these men
create new issues concerning ethnicity and language.
Hence, they gather around those individuals and amateurs
who favor their ideas and ln this manner identify themselves
to the government as leaders of the different ethnic
groups with much power. Many such quasi-political
individuals had been granted high official positions in
previous regimes. Some of these people or their fathers
and grandfathers, because of their state jobs, left their
villages and came to the capital or other larger cities
(see diagram #9). Because of the unstable situation of
the previous governments their positions were insecure.
295
Therefore, they wanted. first to maintain their ties with
their relatives and other members of their ethnic group
so that in the event that they lost their tenious positions
they would have a place where they would be accepted
socially. Second, they maintained their lingistic and
ethnic ties with their related groups so that they can
identify themselves and display their power to the
governments as leaders and powerful representatives of
their own people, and thus maintain their positions.
This problem would be alleviated if Afghans would
develop a plan for distribution of these scarce resources
on the basis of the principles of equality and democracy.
Each ethnic or linguistic group should be given
representative seats in all three organs of the State
based upon the ratio of the number of its population.
Certain criteria should be established for the individuals
who achieve the position. For instance, a person,
regardless of ethnic or linguistic affiliation who wants
to become a representative in the National Jirgah (Mali
Jirgah), a minister, or a member of the Supreme Court,
should read, write and speak both languages. This
has been the rule among Swiss, for example. Abilii¥ and l~l
296
tribal level. These events at the present time, since
they are very new, 'seem to the people superficial but
in essence they are very iMportant.
The breaking off of relations. whether they are
inter-tribal or intra-tribal, at the familial, lineage
or tribal level, not only separates these levels b~t
297
emigrate elsewhere within the country. Moreover, they
might change or even quit their pattern of lumber trading
to West Pakistan. For this purpose tne Pushtuns have
developed their own modes of transportation, which involve
hundreds of camels, and men, the owners of the caravans.
If there is a lack of intimacy and cooperation betw.~en
298
the revenge might be. Social scientists may tell us
about it in the future. Moreover, the competition between
people has already reached the level of antagonism, as
was illustrated in the case of election procedures. I
do not know whether the problem will be solved in the
near future or whether it will continue; that is another
problem for further investigation.
299
FOOTNOTE TO CHAPTER VIII
300
APPENDIX A
301
(primary court) of the village was called upon. The
maraka was unable to reach an agreeable solution to the
trouble-case. Both sides decided to call upon the dwahum
maraka (secondary village court). The parties involved
also decided to ask for two marakachian (members of the
village council) from Almara to join the first maraka. A
messenger was sent to them. Because of the distance between
Almara and the dead man's village, the village council
members were provided horses to go there. On the way to
the dead man's village, the two men in addition to their
previous information received sufficient first hand data
from the messenger to make their decision before they
arrived at the village. When the two marakachi and the
messenger got near the village they saw a group of people
awaiting them. The two men decided to stop there and
announce their decision through an act rather than by
speaking. The two marakachi had a chalem (smoking pipe)
with them. One marakachi took the smoking pipe, emptied it,
then poured fresh water into it from the nearby stream. The
other prepared the tobacco while they were observed by the
villagers waiting for them in front of the hamlet. The two
men from Almara took the pipe and both smoked the tobacco.
When they were finished smoking, they walked to the village
and they were greeted by the villagers. The first maraka
and the parties involved understood what they wanted to
imply by their smoking.
)02
The marakachian ~rom Almara wanted to indicate this:
When a person wants to smoke he should re~resh the smoking
pipe and put in it his own tobacco or, at least, should
oversee another's preparation o~ the smoking pipe for him.
Also, the marakachian showed the people that nothing happened
to them when they smoked. Therefore, the death of '(A) was
just an accident and no one was responsible for it. When
the two men joined the villager's group, their demonstration
and decision was accepted as a just and satisfactory
settlement for the trouble-case; the dead man's relatives
did not want to ask for compensation.
and live on the other side of the Durand Line among the
Wazirs in West Pakistan. When the truck arrived at the
river, where the highway robber was waiting, the truck driver
30]
was stopped by the rifle-wielding robber. The driver
stopped the truck and the robber took all of his money and
fled. By coincidence~ a jeep on its way to Khost with
several policemen passengersand Woluswal (subgoverner)
arrived in several minutes at the site of the crime. When
the driver saw the Woluswal and the policemen, he ran
after the robber empty handed. The robber was not far away
and he warned the driver not to follow him. The driver
continued running after him. The robber turned around and
shot the driver and then fled leaving behind his dead
victim. The Woluswal and the policemen, watching the scene
closely, could not do anything.
The victim's body was carried to his native village
and was buried. After several months the dead man's
brother and his relatives went to Khost. The case was
reported to the government. A thorough investigation of
the case was conducted. The driver's brother accused the
Tani villagers of helping and accommodating the highway
robber and his brothers in their village. The judge could
not put anybody into jail. He advised the parties involved
to resolve the trouble-case through the traditional way of
conflict settlement. The first maraka was convened.
According to their decision, 20 men from Tani were asked
to take an oath that they had neither helped the murderer
nor had they accommodated him in their village. The Tani
villagers took the oath and the trouble-case was resolved.
)04
Case No. 17= Competition and Confrontation over Election
Place: Paktya
Date: 1964
During the election 1964, two groups of people in
one of the election zones in Packtya Province got involved
in an intense competition. There are 14 tribes in .....the
election zone. Almost half of the people speak Pashto a~~
their money and their energy to feed people and br~ng them
in trucks and buses to the polling booths.
Before the proclamation of the New Afghanistan
Constitution in 1964, these people took turns sending
representatives to the Low and High Houses. Upon the en-
forcement of the Constitution in 1964, they began to have
a direct, secret and independent vote and election system.
Because of the competition between the two linguistic groups,
each bloc wanted to win the election. When election days
arrived, groups of people were transported in trucks and
buses and led by their leaders to the polling booths. The
Pashto-speaking bloc violated the law and the candidate
invited people other than the people of the electoral zone
to come to the election zone and vote illegally for him.
Some officials received the message and, while understanding
the situation, either could not control the people because
these people do not have tazkera (identification card) or
they had received bribes from the candidates to allow the
situation to contime. When the candidate of the Persian-
305
speaking bloc saw what was happening, he submitted a
complaint to the governor of the province. The governor
also either did not want to get involved, or could not
control the situation. The latter bloc, upset about the
unlawful behavior of the former bloc, asked their candidate
to resign from the candidacy and they had not gone ~o vote
signifying deep hatred and antagonism toward the government
and the other bloc. The Pashto-speaking bloc candidate won
the election. Relationships between the two blocs before
the proclamation of the constitution was of a friendly
nature and many of them were affines to each other. Since
the enforcement of the new laws, relationships between
the people have changed. They are not as friendly as they
were before.
306
rifles, came to the Woloswali (second degree administrative
unit after province). The people were shooting rifles in
the air, shouting and singing. The candidates provided
the people with a great amount of rice and meat. Some people
were even given bribes to collect votes for the candidates.
Some voters had an argument over an unimportant iss~e that
turned into a fight and two persons were killed.
Before the declaration of the New Constitution in
1964, the people under study did not have the voting system.
They took turns sending their representatives to Wolosi
Jirgah (Low House) and Meshrano Jirgah (High House).
Nobody could recall this type of conflict with respect to
sending representatives to the houses.
Since many people were involved in the incident and
the danger of confrontation was great, the government
intervened and nobody was elected from the area. The case
has remained unsolved to date.
307
the problem among themselves. This time they did not meet
and even the educated members of the two blocs did not
want to meet and discuss a solution for the trouble-case.
Moreover, this time the two candidates spent a great
amount of energy and money; the competition became so
intense that the Persian-speaking candidate was warned by
his relatives and friends to withdraw his candidacy because
of the fear of a confrontation and war between the two
blocs. Once again, the Pashto-speaking group invited
people from other electoral areas to come to the capital
of the province and vote for this candidate. The govern-
ment again did not or could not control the illegal voting.
The Persian-speaking candidate and his supporters boycotted
the election signifying hatred toward the government and
the opposing bloc. The Pashto-speaking bloc again sent
their representative to the Low House. The relationship
between the two blocs is worse than ever.
J08
a fertile piece of land with a Sultani Karaze (underground
irrigational system). The land has been irrigated by the
irrigational system for many years. Recently an individual
has been coaming off water from the land and irrigating a
piece of dry land with it. I want you people to advise
this person to stop this injustice.
After listening to the woman's complaint, the maraka
asked her husband what his side was. The husband said:
she is right. There is a piece of fertile land and a
Sultani Karaze has been passing through the land for many
years. Because of many rain and snowfalls this year, the
Sultani Karaze flooded. The irrigation system has
sufficient water for the both irrigated and dry land. Do
you think it is unjust if irrigation system water irrigated
both parcels of land?
The maraka discussed the case among then:selves. They
decided that the first wife's land (the irrigated fields)
had priority over the second wife's land and that the
husband should spend more time with her. But, if the Sultruri
Karaze has sufficient water, the husband is allowed to
divert water to the dry land. In other words, if a husband
is strong enough, he can have a second wife. The decision
was satisfactory to both wife and the husband.
In this case two things deserve attention: first,
the people express themselves indirectly and yet very
politely. Second, this case shows a change in attitude on
the part of a wife toward her husband. Until very recent
)09
years a woman was not able to express complaints against
her husband in his presence and before the council of
elders.
310
Finally, the village council was called on. The
maraka discussed the trouble-case. They decided that the
land should go to the lender, but they asked him to help
the borrower and give him 10,000 Afs. Since the lender
did not want to give back the land because it would have
had damaged his honor in the village, he accepted ~he
311
not respond. When the young villagers went home that
evening, they told their fathers and uncles what had
happened. Several days later the young men's fatherS
informed the village about the case. One day, most of the
villagers went to where the trees had been replanted.
The owner of the trees was also informed to go to the
place. The situation was tense and there was a fear of
confrontation. The owner of the trees, realizing the
situation, asked his brothers and his other close kin to
arm themselves and go and hide in ambush in a garden near
the canal. When the villagers came to the scene, the two
young men's fathers and uncles were very angry at the owner
of the trees. They complained to the villagers about what
had happened three days before. Some other viliagers
favoring their views also got mad at the tree-owner. At
that moment, one tree owner's relatives, noting the danger
of a confrontation, asked an elderly man from the opposing
party to go and unroot the trees not planted in the right
place. The elderly man took off his shoes, walked into
the water and unrooted the trees. The incident was over
and the trouble-case was resolved.
)12
rifle and fled to his native village. The case was
referred to the police department and to the court because
the thief came from a powerful tribe and they did not want to
resolve the trouble case through maraka. The thief was
sentenced to prison for three years.
The thief died in the prison because of an illness.
The deceased's body was carried to his native village and
buried there. The dead man's relatives have been seeking
revenge because, according to them, the death of their
relative was caused ·by the imprisonment. The case is still
not resolved. The dead man's relatives want recompense.
313
nephew went out of the tea shop, the wood seller asked the
man to follow him. Since he was threatened by rifle and
was empty handed, he had no other alternative. The wood
seller teek him to his own village and kept him there for
several days. The wood seller also sent a messenger to
the truck owner to return his money. The truck owner's
sons went to the capital city of Kabul and found a close
relative of the wood seller, captured him and brought him
to their own village. They then infermed the weod seller
that they had a relative of his.
Both sides decided to settle the dispute through the
maraka. Four persons were chosen, two by .one side and twe
by the ether. The maraka convened and the case was discusse~
.314
The villagers forcefully got onto the top of the bus where
the traveler's luggage was placed. The driver stopped the
bus near these people's village and asked for their fare.
They refused to pay the fare. A fight ensued and the
driver was hit with an axe. The injured driver was carried
to the nearby hospital. After he recovered and we~t home,
the opposite side sent a messenger to the driver's father
and brothers expressing their willingness to resolve the
dispute based on the Pashtun's tsale (code). A maraka was
called upon and the decj.&ion made b~r them was announced to
the involved parties. The maraka asked the wrongdoers to
pay the topake (medical expenses) and a sharm (shame) of
one cow. The wrongdoers bought a cow and together with
several of their elderly relatives came to the driver's
father's house. They also offered the driver the topaki.
Since the driver's father is a rich man he returned the
money back and only accepted the cow to save his honor.
The cow was slaughtered and the villagers were invited to
share the meal with the driver's family and relatives as
well as with the wrongdoers and their elderly relatives.
After serving their meal the wrongdoers apologized for
their wrongdoing in the presence of the villagers. The
trouble-case was resolved.
315
A man climbed a mulberry tree to collect leaves and
twigs for his camel. At the moment, a passenger whom he
knew also came to the place. After exchanging greetings,
the passenger wanted to leave. The man on the tree asked
him to spend the night with him. The passenger sat under
the shadow of the tree and leaned his loaded rifle ,against
the tree trunk. While the camel was eating leaves and
twigs, a small branch of the tree touched the rifle and
the rifle went off. The man in the tree was hit with the
bullet, fell from the tree and died. The dead man's body
was buried. Several days later the dead man's relatives
sent a messenger to the passenger and accused him of causing
the death of his relative since he was shot with the
passenger's rifle. The passenger denied the accusation and
the maraka (village council) was called. The maraka met
and asked the parties involved what their complaints were.
The dead man's relative told the maraka that the passenger
was responsible for the death of his relative because he
was shot with his rifle and the dead man's relative wanted
compensation.
While the maraka members were watching and listening
to the accused's answer, he took his rifle, loaded with
bullets, and leaned it against the wall. He left the rifle
for several minutes; nothing happened. In essence, the
owner of the rifle was indicating that a loaded rifle would
not go off unless someone touches it and fires it. While
the passenger demonstrated all this, he did not talk at all.
316
The members of the council of elders turned their
faces toward the dead man's relative to understand his
point. The dead man's relative took the same rifle, un-
loaded it and then pulled the chamber but the rifle did
not go off. In this manner, without speaking, the dead
man's relative showed that if the rifle had not be~p loaded,
it would not have gone off. After the maraka heard both
sides, they asked the parties involved to leave while they'
make their decision. The maraka said that both the camel
and the rifle had caused the man's death. The camel
belonged to one side and the rifle to the other side.
Therefore, the dead man's nake or khoon (blood-price) should
bs paid by both sides. Since the nake for a man was 60,000
Afs., they divided the amount in half. The owner of the
rifle was asked to pay )0,000 Afs. The decision was
accepted by the parties and the trouble-case was resolved.
)17
mother brought some khone (sweet) and gave it to the boy's
mother. This type of sweet-giving signifies a primary
agreement of the marriage. It is an informal agreement
between the women of the parties involved.
After a few days another individual (B) sent his wife
,
to the girl's parents house to ask if they would gLve their
daughter to her son. The woman promised her daughter to
B's son also. The girl's and the boy's fathers both were
informed by their wives. Both sides agreed upon the
marriage of the girl to the boy. The father of the boy
and his close relatives went to the girl's father's house
and decided upon the marriage of the girl to his son and
they were given sweet and a sten (a handkerchief with a
needle made by the girl herself). The exchange of sweet
between two parties and sten given to the boy's party
signifies an official engagement among the Pashtuns.
After several days (A) reported the case to the
government and four persons were put in jail from the second
party (B). The official advised both sides to resolve the
trouble-case through customary law. Parties involved
agreed and four marakachi (member of village council) from
Almara were invited to resolve the case. The maraka
convened and told (A) until the prisoners were released
from jail. they did not want to discuss the trouble-case.
(A) went to the police department and court and asked for
the prisoners release. Since his wish signified a solution
of the problem, the government released the prisoners from ~
318
The maraka aSked the parties to present their legal
points. (A) said that khone (exchange of sweet) is the
same as if a person takes a moshtake (small amount of grain)
to a mill in order to be first on the line. Among the
Pashtuns the person who takes his moshtake first is ahead
of everybody. According to (A) a gift of sweets iQ the case
of engagement was analogous to this rule. Therefore, (A)
wanted the girl for his son.
(B) said "A is rich and powerful and he overrides my
rights." He claimed that marrying a girl to someone's son
is like buying cloth from a shopkeeper: after the cloth is
cut, the purchaser owns it. According to B, after the
ceremony of sweet exchange and giving a s~en to the boy's
father, the engagement is official. To markachian
the statement made by B seemed logical and in accordance
with Pashtun marriage code. Therefore, A lost the case
and the trouble-case was settled.
)19
To make the deal official the lender went to the court and
talked to the judge about the case. The judge told him to
take two men with him as witnesses and that the sick man
should acknowledge in the presence of the witnesses that
he wanted to sell his land to the lender. The lender and
two other men from the same village went together ~o the
sick man's house. The sick man told the witness to report
to the judge that he, indeed, wanted to sell his land to
the lender. The witnesses reported back to the judge and
the judge signed the necessary papers. Now the land was
officially sold to the lender.
The sick man's relatives knew nothing about the case.
After the sick man died and was buried, the dead man's
relatives learned of' the transaction. They sent a messenger
to the money lender and informed him that they not only did
not want to sell him the land, but, also, they wanted
compensation for their honor since they felt their relativ~
)20
Case No. 29: Homosexuality and Feuding
Place: Khost
Date: 1975
A group of homosexuals kidnapped a handsome student
guest from a wedding reception while he was watching the
dancers and listening to the musicians. The student
, was
threatened with a pistol and knife and warned to follow the
kidnappers and stay with the leader of the group in his
house overnight. The boy was taken there and released after
two days. The case was reported to the government by the
school officials. The leader of the kidnappers was sentenced
to jail for four years.
When the boy went home he told his father and uncle
about what had happened to him. A few weeks later, the
prisoner, guarded by two soldiers, was walking in the town.
The student, his father and his uncle saw the prisoner
talking to his brother and his friends. The boy's father,
armed with a rifle together with his son and brother, walked
close to the prisoner and shot several bullets at him. The
prisoner was seriously injured. The injured shouted at his
brother and told him that he was seriously injured. He told
his brother to kill the student's father. His brother
withdrew his setaw (knife) from his pocket and tore open
the abdomen of the student's father and inflicted several
other injuries to him. The injured father died on the spot.
The prisoner was taken to the hospital and there he died
of his injuries.
321
After the death of the two individuals, the situation
became more tense and the student's relatives wanted
revenge, but as yet no further retaliation occurred.
322
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abu, Zahra, N.
1970 "On the Modesty of Women in Arab Muslim
Yillages: A Reply," American Anthropologist,
72:1079:87.
1974 "Material Power, Honor, Friendship and the
Etiquette of Yisiting," Anthropological
Quarterly, 47:120-138.
Afghan Demographic Studies, Central Statistics Office,
1975 Prime Ministry
A Provisional Gazetteer of Afghanistan,
Vol. I, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Ali, Mohammad
1965 The Afghans, Kabul: Kabul University Press,
printed at the Punjab Educational Press,
Pakistan.
Amin, Hamidullah and Schilz, Gordon B.
1976 A GeographY of Afghanistan, Omaha, Nebraska:
Center for Afghanistan Studies.
Antoun, Richard T.
1968 "On the Modesty or' Women in Arab Muslim
Villages: A Study in the Accommodation of
Traditions," American Anthropologist,
70:671-97.
1972 Arab Yillage, Indiana University Press.
Antoun, R. T., Harik, 1., (eds.)
1972 Rural Politics and Social Change in the
Middle East, Bloomington: Indiana University
Press.
Aryubi, M. Hakim
1958 "Customary Law of the Paktya Region," Hogug"
·Yol. 7, pp. 31-40.
Asad, T.
1972 "Market model, class structure and consent:
a reconsideration of Swat political
organization," Man, Yolo 7 :74-94.
1973 "Two European Images of Non-European Rule," in
Anthropology and the Colonial ~ncounter, edt
T. Asad, London: Ithaca, 103-120.
323
Atooh, Abdul Aal
1971 The Role of Islamic JErisprudence in Present
Legi;?lation (Translated by A. S. Serat from
Arabic to Persian,) Kabul: Kabul University
Press.
Awda, A. Qader
1969 Islamic Criminal and Civil Laws, (Trans-
lated" from -Arablc to Pashto), Abdul Qader
Hadayet (translator) Vol. I, Kabul: State
Press.
Ayoub, Victor F.
1965 "Conflict Resolution and Social Reorganizatkn
in a Lebanese Village," Human Organization,
Vol. 24, pp. 11-17.
Bailey, Frederick G.
1969 Strategems and Spoils: A Social Anthro-
pology of Politics, New York: Schochen
Books.
Balandier, George
1970 Political Anthropology, New York: Pantheon
Books.
Barnes, John A.
1954 "Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island
Parish, " Human Relations, Vol. VII, No. I,
pp. 39-58.
1972 "Social Network," An Addison Module in
Anthropology, Module 26, pp. 1-29.
Barth, Fredrik
1959a Political Leadership among The Swat Pathans,
London: London School of Economics.
Monographs on Social Anthropology, No. 19.
1959b "Segmentary Opposition and The Theory of
Garnes: A Study of Pathan Organization,"
Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute,
Vol. 89 :5-21.
1960 "The System of Social Stratification in Swat,
North Pakistan," in Aspects of Caste in South
India, Ceylon and North-West Pakistan (ed.)
E. R. Leach, Cambridge University Press.
Modules of Social Organization, Royal Anthro-
pological Institute, Occasional Papers No. 23.
Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, New York:
Little, Brown.
324
Be~hhoefer, Sandra
1975 "Education and the Advancement of Women
in Afghanistan," Unpublished M.A. Thesis,
University of Maryland.
Bendix, Reinhard
1962 Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, Garden
City, New York: Doubleday and Company.
Bill, James A.
1973 "The Plasticity of Informal Politics.: The
Case of Iran," The Middle East Journal,
Vol. 27:131-151.
Bill, James A. and Carl Leiden
1974 The Middle East: Politic and Power, Boston:
Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Bohannan, Paul J.
1957 Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, London:
Oxford University Press for the International
African Institute.
Social Anthropology, New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
"The Differing Realms of the Law," The
Ethnography of Law, Laura Nader eds.,
American Anthropologist, Vol. 67, No.6,
Part two, pp. 33-42.
(Ed.) Law and Warfare: Studies in Anthro-
pology of Conflict. Garden City, New York:
The Natural History Press.
"Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthro-
pology" Law in Culture and Society, Laura
Nader ed., Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company,
pp. 401-441.
Burns, Emile
1971 An Introduction to Marxism. New York:
International Publishers.
Canfield, R.
1973b "The Ecology of Rural Ethnic Groups and the
Spatial Dimensions of I'i:),,~'er," American
Anthropologist, Vol. 75 (5) :1511-1528.
Caroe, Olaf
1965 The Pathans, New York: St. Martin's Press.
Centliveres, P. M.
1971 "A Muslim Shaman of Afghan-Turkistan, "
Ethnology, Vol. 10 (2):160-171.
325
Collier, Jane F.
1975 "Legal Processes," Annual Review of
Anthropology, edt Bernard J. Siegel,
California: Annual Review Inc. pp. 121-144.
Colson, E.
1953 "Social Control and Vengeance in Plateau
Tonga Society," Africa, VoL 2J: 199-211.
Constitution of the Republic of Afghanistan
1977 Afghanistan Council Newsletter, Speqial
Issue, February 1977, New York: Asia
Society, pp. 3-14.
Coon, C.
1951b Caravan, New York.
Coser, Lewis
1956 The Function of Social Conflict, New York:
The Free Press.
Dahrendorf, Ralf
1957 Class and Class Conflict in Industrial
Society. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Dari, G. M.
1968 The Organization of the Inheritance, Supreme
Court Publication, Kabul: Ministry of
Education Press.
Domont, Louis
1968 "Marriage Alliance," International
Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, New York:
Macmillan, and Free Press, Vol. 10:19-23.
Dupree, Louis
1973 Afghanistan, Princeton University Press.
1974 '~fghanistan: Problem of a Peasant-Tribal
Society," L. Dupree and L. Albert eds.,
Afghanistan in 1970s, New York: Praeger
Publishers, pp. 1-12.
1974d "A Note on Afghanistan," AUFS Reports,
South Asia Series, Vol. XVII, No. 8.
1976 "On Two Views of the Swat Pushtun," Current
Anthropology, Vol. 18, No. ):514-518.
1976 "The New Republic of Afghanistan: The
First Twenty-One Months," Special Paper,
Afghanistan Council of the Asia Society
(New York).
326
Dupree, Louis and L. Albert (eds.)
1974 Afghanistan in the 1970s, New York:
Praeger Publishers.
Ember, Carol R. and Ember Melvin
1977 Cultural Anthropology, New Jersey: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Epstein, Arnold L.
1967 "The Case Method in the Field of Law,"
The Craft of Social Anthropology, A.... L.
Epstein ed., London: Tavistock.
Evans-Pritchard, 'E. E.
1963 Comparative Method in Social Anthropology,
The Athlone Press.
1964 Social Anthropology and Other Essays, New
York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
1970 "Sexual Inversion among the Azande,"
American Anthropologist, Vol. 72:1428-1434.
Fazlur Rahman
1966 Islam, New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.
Ford, Clellan, S.
1967 Cross-Cultural Approaches: Readings in
Comparative Research, New Haven: HRAF Press.
Fortes, M.
1953 "The Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups,"
American Anthropologist, Vol. 55:17-41.
Freser-Tytler
1967 Afghanistan (Jrd ed., revised by M. Gillett),
London.
Gluckman, Max
1956 Custom and Conflict in Africa, New York:
Barnes and Noble.
1962 "African Jurisprudence," The Advancement of
Science, Vol. 72:439-454.
1965b The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, New
Haven: Yale University Press.
1965c Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society,
Chicago, Aldine.
1967 "The Judicial Process among the Barotse,"
Law and Warfare, ed., Paul Bohannan, New York:
the Free Press, pp. 59-91.
"Introduction," A. L. Epstein, ed., The
Craft of Social Anthropology, pp. xi-xx.
"Concepts in Comparative Study of Tribal
Law," Law in Culture and Society, Laura Nader
ed., Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company
327
Goodenough, Ward H.
1967 "Compotential Analysis," Science, Vol.
156:120)-1209.
1970 Description and Comparison in Cultural
Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine Publishing
Company.
Graburn, Nelson
1971 Readings in Kinship and Social Structure.
New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc.
Gregorian, V.
1969 The Emergence of Modern Afghanistan, Stan-
ford: Stanford University Press.
Habibi, A.
1975 History of the Pashto Literature, Vol. I,
Kabul: Kabul University Press.
Haim, S.
196) The Shorter Persian-English Dictionary,
Tehran: Y. Beroukhim and Sons, Booksellers.
Hakimi, Abdul Karim
1977 Country Report (Afghanistan), Fifth
Population Census Conference, January )1 -
February 5, 1977, Honolulu, Hawaii, United
States of America.
Harris, Marvin
1971 Man, Culture and Nature: An Introduction
to General Anthropology, New York:
Thomasy, Crowell Company.
Hoebel, E. A.
1954 The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in
Comparative Legal Dynamics, Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
1968 "Law and Anthropology" in Readings in
Anthropology, Morton H. Fried, ed., New
York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, pp. 447-
461.
Hughes, T.
1885 Dictionary of Islam, London.
Irons, William
194a. "Variation in Political Stratification
among the Yomut Turkmen," Anthropological
Quarterly, Vol. 44:):14)-156.
)28
Jones, Schuler
1974 Men of Influence in Nuristan: A Study of
Social Control and Dispute Settlement in
Waigal Valley, New York: Seminar Press.
Kaplan, D. and Manners, R. A.
1972 Culture Theory, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,
Inc.
Khadduri, Majid and Liebensy, Herbert J. (ed.)
1958 I~w in the Middle East (translated by
Zainul Abudin Rahnuma), Tahran: eqbal.
Kroeber, A.
1909 "Classificatory Systems of Relationships,"
Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute, Vol. 39:77-84.
Levine, Robert A. and Cambell, Donald T.
1972 Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic
Attitudes and Group Behavior. New York:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Levy, Reuben
1971 The Social Structure of Islam. London:
Cambridge University Press.
Linton, Ralph
1964 The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-
Century-Crofts, Originally published in
1936.
Llewellyn, K. N., and Hoebel, E. A.
1941 The Cheyenne Way, Norman, Oklahoma: Univer-
sity of Oklahoma Press.
Lloyd, C.
1968 "Conflict Theory and Yoraba Kindoms,"
History and Social Anthro;,~,.1Qgy, ed. I. M.
Lewis, London: Tavistock Publications,
pp. 25-61.
Lowie, Robert
1937 The History of Ethnological Theory, New
York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lowy, Michael J.
1973 "A Review of Anthropology of Law: A
Comparative Theory," Leopold Pospisil
New York and London: Harper and Row, 1971.
American Anthropologist, Vol. 75, No.4,
pp. 953-957.
329
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1926 Crime and Custom in Savage Society, London:
Kegan Paul, Trench, and Trubner.
Mckusick, Victor A.
1964 Human Genetics, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Moore, Sally Falk
1960 "Marxian Law in Primitive Society," Culture
in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin,
Stanley Diamond, ed., New York: Columbia
Press, pp. 642-662.
"Law and Anthropology," Biennial RE:view 0:[
Anthropology, Bernard J. Siegel ed.,
California: Stanford University Press,
pp. 253-300.
1973 "Law and Social Change: the Semi-Autonomous
Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of
Study," Law and Society Review, Vol. '1,
No.4, pp. 719-746.
Murdock, P. G.
1949 Social Structure, New York: The Macmillan
Company.
Musa, Yusif
1973 Islamic Jurisprudence and Western Laws
(Translated from Arabic to Persian)
Namattulah Sharani, Kabul: Kabul University
Press.
Nader, Laura
1965b "The Anthropological Study of Law," in "The
Ethnography of Law," Laura Nader, ed.,
American Anthropologist, Vol. 67, No.6,
Part 2, pp. 3-32.
"An Analysis of Zapotec Law Cases," Law and
Warfare, ed., Paul Bohannan, New York: The
Free Press, pp. 117-138.
Law in Culture and Society, Chicago: Aldine
Publishing Company.
Nader, Laura and Yngresson, Barbara
1973 "On Studying the Ethnography of Law and its
Consequences," Handbook of Social and
Cultural Anthropology, John J. Honigman ed. ,
Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, pp. 883-
921.
Naroll, Raoul
1964 "On Ethnic Unit Classification," Current
Anthropology, Vol. 5:283-312.
330
Newell, Richard S.
1972 The Politics of Afghanistan, New York: .
Cornell University Press.
Nimkoff, M. F. and Middleton, R.
1960 "Types of Family and Types of Economy,"
American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 66:215-
225.
Otterbein, Keith F.
1970a The Evolution of War: A Cross-Cultural
Study, New Haven: Human Relations Area
Files Press.
1972 Comparative Cultural Analysis: An Intro-
duction to Anthropology, New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
Pasternak, Burton
1976 Introduction to Kinship al~ Social
Organization, New Jersey: Prentice-Ha.ll~Inc.
Perhson, Robert N.
1966 The Social Organization of the Marri Baluch.
Compiled and Analyzed from His Notes by
Fredrik Barth. Viking Fund Publication in
Anthropology, 43, Chicago.
Pickthall, Mohammad Marmaduke
1954 The M 8.ning of the Glorious Koran, New York:
C
331
Redfield, Robert
1967 "Primitive Law," Law and Warfare: Studies
in the Anthropology of Conflict, Paul
Bohannan ed., New York: The Natural History
Press, pp. 2-24.
Roberts, John lVI.
1969 "Oaths, Autonomic Ordeal and Power," in
Cross-Cultural Approaches, Clellan S. Ford
ed., New Haven: HRAF Press, pp. 169-195.
Salzman, P. C.
1971 "Adaptation and Political Organization in
Iranian Baluchistan," Ethnology, VoL X,
No.4, pp. 433-444.
1973 "Continuity and Change in Baluchi Tribal
Leadership," International Journal of
Middle East Studies, Vol. IV, No. 4, pp.
428-439.
1974 "Tribal Chiefs as Middlemen: The Politics
of Encapsulation in the Middle East,"
Anthropological Quarterly, 41:203-11.
Schapera, Isaac
1938 A Handbook of Tsawana Law and Custom. London:
Oxford University Press.
1956 Government and Politics in Tribal Society,
New York: Humanities Press.
Schneider, David M.
1969 "Some Muddles in the Models: Or How the
System Really Works," The Relevance of
Models for Social Anthropology, ed.,
Michael Banton, New York: Tavistock
Publications, pp. 25-85.
Schusky, Ernest L.
1965 Manual for Kinship Analysis. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Seligman, B. Z.
1951 Notes and Queries in Anthropology, (6th ed.)
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Serat, A. Satar (translator)
1971 The Role of Islamic Juris rudence in Present
~eg~§l~tion in Persian Kabul: Kabul
University Press.
Service, Elman R.
1971 Profiles in Ethnology (Revised), New York:
Harper and Row.
332
Stenz, E.
1974 "The Climate of Afghanistan: its Aridity,
Dryness and Divisions," Geography Review.
Vol. 37, Paris.
Subki, I.
1850 Jamal-Jawami Fi I-Usul, Vol. II. Cairo:
Bulaq.
Swartz, Marc J., et al
1966 PoIItICal Anthropology, Marc J. Swa~tz,
et al eds., New York: Atherton.
Sweet, L. E.
1969 "A Survey of Recent Middle Eastern
Ethnology," The Middle East Journal,
Vol. 23:221-32.
~ COIEEa"~~Edi ti.~!!"""~! ".!h~" Oxf~X~ Engli~l:l
DJqt.AOl:U:!-!:Y, 1971,
Vol. I., London: Oxford University Press.
Webster
Webster's third new international dictionary
or:tne"Eiiglish-~a~g~u-age; -" Sp"rIng"field ,-Mass. ,
Grand C. Merrian Company.
Whorf, Benjamin L.
1956 Language, Thought and Reality, New York:
Wiley, Wills, Christopher.
Wilber, Donald N.
1962 Afghanistan, 2nd ed., New Haven: Human
Relations Area Files Press.
1952 "The Structure of Islam in Afghanistan,"
The Middle East Journal, Vol. 6 (1):41-48.
Winder, Ewin A.
"Political Anthropology," Biennial Review
of Anthropology, B. J. Siegel ed.,
California: Stanford University Press,
pp. 301-375.
Yousefzai, A. Baqui
1974 "Kabul University Student: A Potential
Political Force?" L. Albert and L. DUDree
eds., Afghanistan in the 19708, New York:
Praeger Publishers, pp. 167-182.
333
Yus uf, Ahmed Beita
1976 '~egal Pluralism in.the Northern State of
Nigeria: Conflict of Laws in a Multi-
Ethnic Environment," An Unpublished Ph. D.
Dissertation, Department of Anthropology,
State University of New York at Buffalo.
Zadran, Alef-Shah
·1974 "Dispute Resolution among the Pashtuns of
the Suleiman Foothills of Afghanistan,"
An Unpublished Masters Thesis, Department
of Anthropology, State University of New
York at Buffalo.
Zarif, Mohammad
1976 "A Look at.Paktya Province Geography,"
Wazhma, Vol. 20, No.1, pp. 131-147.
Additional Bibliography
Bliss, Wesley L.
1961 "In the Wafe of the Wheel; Introduction
of the Wagon to the Papago Indians of
Southern Arizona," Human Problems in
Technologica.l Change ed. E. H. Spicer,
New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Holmberg, Allan R.
1961 "The Wells that Failed: An Attempt to
Establish a Stable Water Supply in Viru
Valley, Peru," Human Problems in
Technological Change, E. H. Spicer ed.
New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Sharp, Lauriston
1961 "Steel Axes for Stone Age Australians,"
Human Problems in Technological Change,
Edward H. Spicer ed., New York: Russel
Sage Foundation.
334