Director v.

bayot kasal marriage license practice not a

Bayot advertisement trade
Ledesma v. climacounsel de oficio electrion registrar; privillege
Climaco withdraw as counsel de burdened with
oficio conditions
Cui v. Cui cuidad, care, hospicio de san titulo de abogado; definition of
jose means lawyer, not lawyer; llb has
holder of llb little to do with
admission;
power of court
Villegas v. villegaslator congress prohibited definition of
Valentino from appearing as appearance;
counsel; here, only in reason of
non-appellate courts prohibition re
legislators
Alawi v. Alauya alauyan title member of sharia bar sharia bar
not fully fledged passer not fully
member of regular bar; fledged
cant use atty title attorney; title
reserved for
those
authorized
Pangan v. Panganlan (Pedro DD can't use name in law do no
Ramos Ramos) practice other than the falsehood;
one stated in rollo; else, means
deception consistent with
truth and honor
In Re Medado meedad na nung nag sign forgot to sign rollo; 30 canon 9;
yrs; signing allowed but unauthorized
deferred 1 yr practice of law
Cayetano v. lawyer-economist; definition of
Monsod lawyer-manager, etc. practice of law
practice of law.
Soriano v. sori nag overtake kasi homicide, or any crime, GMC
Dizon may or may not involve continuing
moral turpitude, requirement
depending on
circumstances. Here,
IMT kasi mayabang
yung lawyer
Wellington gaaman, nang eextort for extortion, NBI delay no man
Reyes v. Gaa estafa entrapment, delay no
man for money or
malice, disbarred
Ting-Dumali v. torres title issuance tungkol sa mana, lawyer's oath
Torres concealed fact in not mere
affidavit he notarized; ceremony;
advised falsification of canon1, 1.02;
public document; canon 7; canon
10, 10.01
 offered false testimony.
Disbarred

People v. tuanda, tinda alahas agent to sell jewelry, bp 22 may

Tuanda didn’t return unsold, involve MT; not
issued checks. related to office
Bounced. Acquitted of but relates to
estafa but convicted of GMC
charges of bp 22.
suspended by CA.
involves moral turpitude,
not related to office but
speaks of moral
character.
In Re Abad in another case, he two essential
didn't take the oath but requisites to be
signed rollo. He admitted;
practiced law without LO+signing
taking oath. In this case,
he denied having
practiced law under oath
(perjury). Fined again,
and still unauthorized to
practice law.
Aguirre v. Rana Rana nag oath muna passed bar, but even two essential
before oath taking and requisites to be
signing of rollo, he admitted;
appeared as counsel for LO+signing
vice mayor and mayor
candidate in masbate.
Day before oath taking,
case was filed.
Unauthorized practice of
law, denied admission.
In Re Edillon doesn’t want to pay IBP justification of
membership fees lol IBP; police
power; practice
of law privilege
vested w public
interest; rule
making power
SC
In Re Lanuevo OBC mere
custodian
cannot re-
evaluate
booklets;
serious
misconduct
(lanuevo); need
to state any
charge even if
not IMT; failure
is fraudulent
People v. villaguna city prosec city prosec allowed by characteristics
Villanueva SOJ and JP court to act of practice of
as private prosecutor for law
his relative. Defense
counsel moved to
inhibit. Allowed; private
practice of law is not
isolated appearance but
characterized by
habituality and
compensation.
Dia-Anonuevo bercaso tumanggap yung mtj judge ex-officio definition of
v. Bercacio judge notary public notarized private practice
DOAS which was co-
owned by complainant.
Latter went to him and
judge gave advice to
redeem, asked for
redemption
price+incidental fees
(3500+100). Ayaw
isauli. Engaged in
private practice--gave
advise, accepted
compensation, dealt
with complainant,
appeared at pre-trial.
In Re Abad
Bacarro v. pintacanak sweethearts, promised importance of
Pintacan marriage, nabuntis, good moral
asked to abort, ayaw ng character
babae, abandoned.
Even denied under oath
that child was his. Court
ordered to acknowledge
in public document the
filiation as sign of good
faith, but complainant
 commented that he be
disallowed from
admission. 1979 yung
huling activity. 8 years
later, allowed to take
oath. good moral
character now present,
turned over new leaf.

In Re Argosino camaligan neophyte good moral

hazing, convicted of character reqt
reckless imprudence, purposes;
petitioned to take oath. weed out and
Father kinda forgave, prevent
left it to court to allow.
Court allowed. Good
moral character
requirement not only
continuing reqt to weed
out, but prevent misfits
from joining.
Collantes v. RD refused to register lawyer's oath
Renomeron instruments, 15 years, source of
sinabi na ng LRA na obligation,
iregister, ayaw pa rin. delay no man;
Removed from govt applies to pub
service. Can he be officers
disbarred for grave
misconduct as public
official? Yes.
Montecillo and del mar's client filed oral s20(b)r138;
Del Mar v. Gica defamation. Cfi ruled in criminal
their favor. CA reversed. contempt
SC upheld. Meanwhile, meaning
veiled threats to CA and
even to SC. Mayabang,
ayaw patinag.
Suspended indefinitely.
Criminal contempt
In Re Diosdado attorney mayor conviction of
Gutierrez convicted of murder. He CIMT; absolute
was granted a v conditional
conditional pardon, pardon
remitting the rest of his
sentence upon the
condition that he shall
not violate any penal
laws. Still disbarred. For
"conviction of CIMT" as
ground for disbarment to
 be wiped, pardon has to
be absolute.

De Ysasi III v. father and son, C1.04;

NLRC administrator-employee s20(g)r138
and owner of hacienda
respectively, got into a
family quabble which
ended in the former's
employment being
terminated without
cause. Court
admonished lawyers
that they should seek
extrajudicial
compromise instead of
helping them litigate.
Pajares v. Abad creditor sued debtor for c1.03
Santos collection of sum of
money, but latter moved
for bill of particulars.
Judge denied, 65, also
denied; petitioner and
counsel admonished for
unnecessarily delaying
proceedings for 7 years,
clogging court dockets
with unnecessary and
frivolous appeal.
People v. atty estacio was counsel profession, not
Rosqueta for accused-appellants, a trade or
and failed file brief on business; c2
time. He was ordered to
show cause why he
failed to file brief on
time, and apparently he
did but left it with the
father of the appellants
but nasunog daw bahay
nung tatay.
Magwwithdraw na rin
daw ng appeal yung
mga accused. Still,
admonished that even if
can't secure fees from
clients to file appeal, the
better practice is to be
 appointed as counsel de
oficio.

De Roy and burned down firewall c5

Ramos v. CA and fell on neighbor,
killing daughter too. Aug
17, 1987, last day of
filing notice of appeal,
petitioner's counsel filed
motex; denied per
Habaluyas ruling in
1986. No GOAD; that
the SC decision was not
published in OG does
not prevent the same
from acquiring binding
force, lawyers must
keep abreast with latest
jurisprudence.
People v. Judge 3 accused were charged c6.01
Pineda with multiple counts of
murder and frustrated
murder. The judge,
upon insistence of
accused, ordered
prosec to merge
informations to just one,
because complex crime
daw. Also, there was an
affidavit during PI that
robbery daw yung
nacommit. No. Prosec
cannot be forced to file
information when he
thinks evidence will not
support it.
People v. solgen recommended c6.01
Madera acquittal of two guys
with madera; proper
kasi no evidence of
conspiracy. True
objective of fiscal is not
 to convict but see that
justice is done.

Tan v. Judge MNT and motion to c6.01

Gallardo disqualify judge from
conducting trial,
because judge
convicted accused and
there were contested
allegations of bribery.
SolGen recommended
that MNT be granted.
Private prosecs
opposed. SolGen
represents the state in
these crim proceedings.
SolGen assists State in
governing, and
governing impartially.
Thus, his job is not
primarily to convict but
to bring about justice.
People v.
Sendaydiego
Misamin v. San police captain appeared
Juan as counsel for fil-chi
employers; charged with
protecting alien interests
and coercing
complainant from
desisting. Investigated
by solgen but counsel
for complainant did not
appear. Still, court
admonished that
lawyers should refrain
from appearances of
impropriety.