Dole V Kentex MFTG

2/19/2020 G.R. No. 233781 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT (DOLE), PETITIONER, v.
KENTEX MANUFACTURING CORPORATION …
Home Law Firm Law Library Laws Jurisprudence
July 2019 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court

Custom Search Jurisprudence
Search
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2019 >
July 2019 Decisions > G.R. No. 233781 - DEPARTMENT
ChanRobles On-Line OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT (DOLE), PETITIONER, v.
Bar Review KENTEX MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AND ONG
KING GUAN, RESPONDENTS.:
G.R. No. 233781 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND

EMPLOYMENT (DOLE), PETITIONER, v. KENTEX
MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AND ONG KING GUAN,
RESPONDENTS.
FIRST DIVISION
G.R. No. 233781, July 08, 2019
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT

(DOLE), PETITIONER, v. KENTEX MANUFACTURING
July-2019
CORPORATION AND ONG KING GUAN,
Jurisprudence
RESPONDENTS.
www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2019julydecisions.php?id=526 1/54
2/19/2020 G.R. No. 233781 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT (DOLE), PETITIONER, v. KENTEX MANUFACTURING CORPORATION …
DECISION
DEL CASTILLO, J.:

G.R. No. 233535 -
PEOPLE OF THE Petitioner Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE)
PHILIPPINES, filed this Rule 45 Petition1 assailing the March 27, 2017
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
Decision2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No.
v. WILLIAM
141606 discharging respondent Ong King Guan (Ong), a
RODRIGUEZ Y
corporate officer of Kentex Manufacturing Corporation
BANTOTO, ACCUSED-
(Kentex), from being personally and solidarily liable with
APPELLANT.
Kentex for the monetary awards specified in the June 26,
2015 Order3 rendered by the DOLE-National Capital

G.R. No. 229509 -
PEOPLE OF THE Region (DOLE-NCR) in NCROO-TSSD-1505-OSHI-001.4
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, The Facts
v. BABYLYN
MANANSALA Y CRUZ, Records show that, on May 13, 2015, a fire broke out in
ACCUSED-APPELLANT. the factory located in Valenzuela City owned by Kentex.

The fire claimed 72 lives and injured a number of
G.R. No. 223434 - workers. As part of its standard procedures, personnel of
SUSAN GALANG AND the DOLE Caloocan, Malabon, Navotas and Valenzuela
BERNADETH ALBINO, (DOLE CAMANAVA) Field Office went to Kentex's
IN REPRESENTATION premises.5 For its part, the DOLE-NCR also assessed6

FOR BRENDA FAGYAN, Kentex's compliance with the occupational health and
EDMUND FAGYAN, safety standards.
MARJORIE
CADAWENG, AND In the course of the investigation, it was discovered that
THEIR SUCCESSORS- Kentex had contracted with CJC Manpower Services
IN-INTEREST: VENUS (CJC) for the deployment of workers. The DOLE-NCR
ALBINO, ERICKSON directed Kentex and CJC to attend the mandatory
GALANG, MICHELLE conference set on May 18 and 20, 2015 at the DOLE-
GALANG, PABLO NCR Office in Malate, Manila. Notably, Kentex, its
PADAWIL, GRACE Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Beato Ang, and the
LILIBETH YANZON, corporation's Chief Finance Officer Ong, were made
JEFFERSON DUPING, parties to this case before the DOLE-NCR.
SPS. JONATHAN
JAVIER AND DOMINGA In the meantime, on May 15, 2015, the DOLE Regional
JAVIER, CELINE Office No. III (DOLE-RO III) conducted its own Joint
WAKAT, DUSTIN Assessment7 of CJC. The DOLE-RO III discovered that
LICNACHAN, MARTHA CJC, which deployed workers to Kentex, was an

PODES, LUCIA unregistered private recruitment and placement agency.
PANGKET, SPS. MARK Moreover, it noted that CJC was non-compliant with the
SIBAYAN AND occupational health and safety standards as well as with
BELINDA SIBAYAN, labor standards, such as underpayment of wages and
SPS. ANTONIO SO HU nonpayment of statutory benefits.8 As a result of these
AND SOLEDAD SO HU, findings, the DOLE RO III issued a June 8, 2015
AND SPS. EDUARDO
Compliance Order9 which effectively declared CJC as a
CALIXTO AND PHOEBE
labor-only contractor with Kentex as its principal.10
CALIXTO,
PETITIONERS, v.
Meanwhile, during the mandatory conference set by the
VERONICA WALLIS,
DOLE-NCR, CJC's representatives admitted that there
NELSON INAGCONG
was no service contract between CJC and Kentex; that
SUMERWE, MANUEL
CJC had deployed 99 workers at the Kentex factory on
KADATAR, FELINO
the day of the unfortunate incident; that there were no
EUGENIO, VICTORIA
employment contracts between CJC and the workers;
S. CERDON, JOANNA
that a CJC representative was sent once a week to
MARIE F. CASANDRA,
Kentex only to check on the workers' daily time records;
APOLINARIO D.
that Kentex remitted to CJC the wage of Php230.00/day
MORENO, SPOUSES
for each of the deployed workers from which amount CJC
LARRY AND MARITES
deducted administrative costs and other statutory
EDADES, EVANGELINE
contributions, leaving each worker a mere wage of
B. CAPPLEMAN, PILAR
Php202.50 a day.
T. QUILACIO, MARLON
SIBAYAN, DAISY MAE
Kentex and its corporate officers, through counsel,
RIVER, ROSITA
refuted CJC's claims. They alleged that CJC's workers
AGASEN, JOAN
were originally engaged by Panday Management and
CIRIACO, FLORABEL
Labor Consultancy which CJC later absorbed; and that
N. FLORDELIS,
the workers' wages ranged from Php250.00 to
SPOUSES THEODORE
Php350.00/day on top of CJC's wage of, more or less,
UY AND JHOANNA UY,
Php202/day. They contended that while the
SPOUSES WILBER
corporate/business and employment records had all been
NGAY-OS AND
gutted by fire, Kentex nevertheless complied with the
CRISTINA NGAY-OS,
labor standards particularly on the minimum wage
AND ALL PERSONS
requirement and with the occupational health and safety
ACTING UNDER THEIR
standards, as evidenced by a Certificate of Compliance
AUTHORITY AND
(COC) signed by the DOLE-NCR Regional Director Alex
DIRECTION, THE
Avila (Avila).
MUNICIPAL
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
OF ITOGON, THE The DOLE-NCR's Orders
PROVINCIAL
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE In a June 26, 2015 Order,11 the DOLE-NCR rejected the
OF BENGUET, AND aforementioned arguments of Kentex. It declared that
DEPARTMENT OF Kentex could not invoke the COC because this only
ENVIRONMENT AND attested to the findings of the compliance officer at the
NATURAL time of the assessment/inspection, even as Kentex was
RESOURCES, duty-bound to observe continuing compliance with the
RESPONDENTS. labor standards as well as the occupational health and
safety standards. Like the June 8, 2015 Compliance
G.R. No. 232678 - Order of the DOLE-RO III, the DOLE-NCR also found that
ESTEBAN DONATO CJC was a mere labor-only contractor considering that it
REYES, PETITIONER, was unregistered with the DOLE Regional Office where it
v. PEOPLE OF THE
operated.12 The DOLE-NCR likewise found that the
PHILIPPINES,
workers were underpaid,13 and computed the monetary
RESPONDENT.
claims due them. It concluded, thus —
G.R. No. 239986 - WHEREFORE, premises considered, Kentex

ROMA FE C. Manufacturing Corporation and/or Beato C.
VILLALON, Ang and/or Ong King Guan is/are hereby
PETITIONER, v. ordered to pay within ten (10) days from
RURAL BANK OF receipt hereof, Louie Andaya and 56 other
AGOO, INC., similarly situated employees an aggregate
RESPONDENT. amount of One Million Four Hundred Forty
Thousand Six Hundred Forty-One Pesos and
A.C. No. 9057 Thirty-Nine Centavos (P1,440,641.39).
(Formerly CBD Case Failure to pay said workers within ten (10)
No. 12-3413) - days from receipt hereof shall cause the
ARLENE O. BAUTISTA, imposition of the penalty of double indemnity
COMPLAINANT, v. pursuant to Republic Act No. 8188 otherwise
ATTY. ZENAIDA M. known as 'An Act Increasing the Penalty and
FERRER, Imposing Double Indemnity for Violation of
RESPONDENT. the Prescribed Increase or Adjustment in the
Wage Rates.'
G.R. No. 231917 -
PEOPLE OF THE SO ORDERED.14
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELEE,
v. ANSARI SARIP Y On July 3, 2015, only Ong moved for reconsideration of

BANTOG, ACCUSED- the foregoing order.15 However, in a letter dated July 7,
APPELLANT.
2015,16 DOLE-NCR Regional Director Avila explained that
Ong's motion for reconsideration was not the proper
G.R. No. 242018 -
remedy. Instead, an appeal to the DOLE Secretary
PEOPLE OF THE
should have been made within 10 days from receipt of
PHILIPPINES,
the Order pursuant to Section 1, Rule 11 of Department
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
Order No. 131, Series of2013. Moreover, since Ong
v. LYNDON CAÑETE* Y
received the June 26, 2015 Order on the same day, he
FERNANDEZ AND
had only until July 6, 2015 within which to appeal to the
PETERLOU PIMENTEL
DOLE Secretary. However, Ong never did; thus, the
Y BENDEBEL,
Compliance Order had attained finality.
ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.
After this, Kentex and Ong filed with the CA a Rule 43
Petition17 assailing the (1) June 8, 2015 Compliance

G.R. No. 225847 -
Order; (2) the June 26, 2015 Order; and (3) the July 7,
DANILO L. PACIO,
2015 letter of the DOLE-NCR Regional Director. Among
PETITIONER, v.
the errors Kentex and Ong assigned was the DOLE-NCR's
DOHLE-PHILMAN
finding that Ong was solidarily liable with Kentex for the
MANNING AGENCY,
monetary awards due the workers.
INC., DOHLE (IOM)
LIMITED, AND/OR
Ruling of the Court of Appeals
MANOLO T. GACUTAN,
RESPONDENTS.
Although the CA ruled on the merits of the case and
upheld the assailed Orders and letter of the DOLE-NCR
G.R. No. 222870 -
Regional Director,18 it observed at the outset that
JESSIE TAGASTASON,
Kentex and Ong resorted to the wrong remedy in filing a
ROGELIO
Rule 43 Petition, when the proper remedy should have
TAGASTASON, JR.,
been a Rule 65 certiorari petition from the
ANNIE BACALA-
decisions/resolutions of the DOLE Secretary. In fact,
TAGASTASON, AND
nothing from the assailed documents indicative of acts of
JERSON
grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of
TAGASTASON,
jurisdiction on the part of the DOLE Secretary was set
PETITIONERS, v.
forth or amply demonstrated. And given the fact that
PEOPLE OF THE
time had irretrievably lapsed without any appeal being
PHILIPPINES, OFFICE
availed of by Kentex and Ong as prescribed by the
OF THE SPECIAL
PROSECUTOR OF procedural rules on labor laws,19 the CA ruled that the
BUTUAN CITY, assailed orders had become final and executory.
SUSANO BACALA,
AND BELINDA Anent the particular issue involving Ong, the CA took the
BACALA, view that, as a company officer, he could not be
RESPONDENTS. personally held liable for the debts of Kentex without a
showing of bad faith or wrongdoing on his part for the
G.R. No. 229675 - corporation's unlawful act.20 The CA opined that nothing
PEOPLE OF THE from the DOLE-NCR's June 26, 2015 Order discussed any
PHILIPPINES, act of Ong that showed his involvement in the
APPELLEE, v. JOHN wrongdoing of Kentex. Thus, the dispositive portion of
ORCULLO Y SUSA, the CA judgment stated:
APPELLANT.
FOR THESE REASONS, the Order, dated June
26, 2015, of the DOLE-National Capital
G.R. No. 230923 -
Region in Case No. NCR00-TSSD-1505-OSHI-
BDO UNIBANK, INC.,
PETITIONER, v. 001, is AFFIRMED with the MODIFICATION
that petitioner Ong King Guan is held not
FRANCISCO PUA,
liable for the monetary awards specified in
RESPONDENT.
the Order. The Order, dated June 8, 2015 of
the DOLE-Regional Office No. III, San
G.R. No. 208920 -
Fernando City, Pampanga, in Case No. R003-
JAIME BILAN
MONTEALEGRE AND JA-2015-05-002-6 and the Order/Letter,
dated July 7, 2015, of DOLE-NCR Regional
CHAMON'TE, INC.,
PETITIONERS, v. Director Alex V. Avila, are AFFIRMED.
SPOUSES ABRAHAM
AND REMEDIOS DE SO ORDERED.21
VERA, RESPONDENTS.
Petitioner filed a Motion for Partial Reconsideration22 to
set aside the release or discharge of Ong from liability to
G.R. No. 213760 -
pay the monetary awards. But the CA denied the motion
REYNALDO
SANTIAGO, JR. Y in its August 22, 2017 Resolution.23 Hence, this Petition.
SANTOS, PETITIONER,
v. PEOPLE OF THE The Arguments
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT. Petitioner contends that the CA erred in releasing or
discharging Ong from liability. It argues that, since the
G.R. No. 213198 - June 26, 2015 DOLE-NCR Order had already become
GENEVIEVE ROSAL final and executory, there being no appeal made or
ARREZA, A.K.A. perfected from said order to the DOLE Secretary, the CA
"GENEVIEVE ARREZA could no longer alter the subject Order.
TOYO," PETITIONER,
v. TETSUSHI TOYO, Respondents Kentex and Ong counter that the CA
LOCAL CIVIL Decision correctly released or discharged Ong from
REGISTRAR OF monetary liability because a corporate officer has a
QUEZON CITY, AND juridical personality entirely separate and distinct from
THE ADMINISTRATOR the corporation. They moreover claim that the DOLE-
AND CIVIL NCR Order was a void judgment because they were
REGISTRAR GENERAL deprived of due process; they assert that they could not
OF THE NATIONAL expect a fair decision if they appealed because the then
STATISTICS OFFICE, DOLE Secretary24 had previously announced that cases
RESPONDENTS. would be filed against Kentex, an announcement that
was clearly designed for media consumption and to gain
G.R No. 231358 - publicity mileage.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Our Ruling
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ERNESTO AVELINO, We agree with petitioner.
JR. Y GRACILLIAN,[*]
ACCUSED-APPELLANT. Both the DOLE-NCR and the CA correctly ruled that the
June 26, 2015 Order had already become final and
G.R. No. 206026 - executory in view of the failure of respondents Kentex
JMA AGRICULTURAL and Ong to appeal therefrom to the Secretary of Labor.
DEVELOPMENT Notice ought to be taken of the fact that, at the time the
CORPORATION, DOLE-NCR rendered its ruling, Department Order No.
PETITIONER, v. LAND
131-13 Series of 201325 was the applicable rule of
BANK OF THE
procedure. The pertinent provision states:
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT. Rule 11, Section 1. Appeal. – The
Compliance Order may be appealed to the
G.R. No. 226556 - Office of the Secretary of Labor and
POWER SECTOR Employment by filing a Memorandum of
ASSETS AND Appeal, furnishing the other party with a copy
LIABILITIES of the same, within ten (10) days from
MANAGEMENT receipt thereof. No further motion for
CORPORATION, extension of time shall be entertained.
PETITIONER, v.
COMMISSIONER OF A mere notice of appeal shall not stop the
INTERNAL REVENUE, running of the period within which to file an
RESPONDENT. appeal.
Here, instead of filing an appeal with the DOLE

G.R. No. 229053 - Secretary, Ong moved for a reconsideration of the
PEOPLE OF THE subject Order; needless to say, this did not halt or stop
PHILIPPINES, the running of the period to elevate the matter to the
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, DOLE Secretary. Indeed, the DOLE-NCR took no action
v. JORDAN at all on Ong's motion for reconsideration; in fact, it
CASACLANG DELA categorically informed Ong that his resort to the filing of
CRUZ, ACCUSED- a motion for reconsideration was procedurally infirm. The
APPELLANT. June 26, 2015 Order having become final, it could no
longer be altered or modified by discharging or releasing
G.R. No. 214163 - Ong from his accountability.
RONALD GERALINO M.
LIM AND THE PEOPLE Anent respondents' allegation regarding the DOLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES, Secretary's partiality, this Court agrees with the CA, that
PETITIONERS, v. —
EDWIN M. LIM,
[Kentex and Ong King Guan's] contention
RESPONDENT.
that the Secretary has already prejudged
their liability in her pronouncements before
G.R. No. 237020 -
the media, such that an appeal to her would
DOMINIC INOCENTES,
be an exercise in futility, is untenable. We
JEFFREY INOCENTES,
have the rules. And, as heretofore stated,
JOSEPH CORNELIO
failure to conform to the rules regarding
AND REYMARK
appeal will render the judgment final and
CATANGUI,
executory. True, litigation is not a game of
PETITIONERS, v. R.
technicalities. It is equally true, however, that
SYJUCO
every case must be presented in accordance
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
with the prescribed procedure to ensure an
(RSCI)/ARCH. RYAN I.
orderly and speedy administration of justice.
SYJUCO,
The failure, therefore, of petitioners to
RESPONDENTS.
comply with the settled procedural rules
justifies the dismissal of the present
G.R. No. 225899 -
JESSIE C. ESTEVA, petition.26
PETITIONER, v. Neither was there merit in respondents' claim that they

WILHELMSEN SMITH had been denied or deprived of due process. The facts
BELL MANNING, INC.
clearly disclose that they had substantially participated in
AND WILHELMSEN the proceedings before the DOLE-NCR from the
SHIP MANAGEMENT mandatory conference up to the filing of a position paper
AND/OR FAUSTO R.
PREYSLER, JR., where their side was sufficiently heard. It is axiomatic

RESPONDENTS. that "[t]he observance of fairness in the conduct of any
investigation is at the very heart of procedural due
G.R. No. 214593 - process. The essence of due process is to be heard, and,
DANA S. SANTOS, as applied to administrative proceedings, this means a
PETITIONER, v. fair and reasonable opportunity to explain one's side, or
LEODEGARIO R. an opportunity to seek a reconsideration of the action or
SANTOS, ruling complained of."27
RESPONDENT.
Thus, it is self-evident that the CA committed serious

A.M. No. P-18-3890 error when it ordered the discharge or release of Ong
(Formerly OCA IPI No. from the obligations of Kentex. The reason is elemental
16-4536-P) - ARLENE in its simplicity: contrary to settled, unrelenting
S. PINEDA, jurisprudence, it unconsciously and egregiously sought to
COMPLAINANT, v. alter and modify, as indeed it altered and modified, an
SHERIFF JAIME N. already final and executory verdict. We have already
SANTOS,
declared in Mocorro, Jr. v. Ramirez28 that:
RESPONDENT.
x x x A definitive final judgment, however
G.R. No. 233697 - erroneous, is no longer subject to change or

PEOPLE OF THE revision.
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, A decision that has acquired finality becomes
v. ARNELLO REFE Y immutable and unalterable. This quality of
GONZALES, immutability precludes the modification of a
ACCUSED-APPELLANT. final judgment, even if the modification is
meant to correct erroneous conclusions of
G.R. No. 228000 - fact and law. And this postulate holds true
PEOPLE OF THE whether the modification is made by the court
PHILIPPINES, that rendered it or by the highest court in the
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, land. The orderly administration of justice
v. RONALD PALEMA Y requires that, at the risk of occasional errors,
VARGAS, RUFEL the judgments/resolutions of a court must
PALMEA Y BAUTISTA, reach a point of finality set by the law. The
LYNDON SALDUA Y noble purpose is to write finis to dispute once
QUEZON, AND VIRGO and for all. This is a fundamental principle in
GRENGIA, ACCUSED- our justice system, without which there would
APPELLANTS. be no end to litigations. Utmost respect and
adherence to this principle must always be
G.R. No. 227899 - maintained by those who exercise the power

PEOPLE OF THE of adjudication. Any act, which violates such
PHILIPPINES, principle, must immediately be struck down.
PETITIONER, v. Indeed, the principle of conclusiveness of
COURT OF APPEALS, prior adjudications is not confined in its
P/SUPT. DIONICIO operation to the judgments of what are
BORROMEO Y ordinarily known as courts, but extends to all
CARBONEL AND SPO1 bodies upon which judicial powers had been
JOEY ABANG Y ARCE, conferred.
RESPONDENTS.
The only exceptions to the rule on the
G.R. No. 229943 - immutability of final judgments are (1) the
PEOPLE OF THE correction of clerical errors, (2) the so-called
PHILIPPINES, nunc pro tunc entries which cause no
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, prejudice to any party, and (3) void
v. EDGAR ROBLES, judgments. x x x29
WILFREDO ROBLES,
ROLANDO ROBLES In the absence of any showing that the CA's modification
or alteration of the subject Order falls within the
ALIAS "BEBOT,"
DANTE ARON exceptions to the rule on the immutability of final
(DECEASED), DANILO judgments, the DOLE-NCR's June 26, 2015 Order must
be upheld and respected.
ROBLES ALIAS
"TOTO," JOSE ROBLES
(DECEASED), WHEREFORE, the Petition is hereby GRANTED. The
Court of Appeals' Decision dated March 27, 2017 insofar
ACCUSED; EDGAR
ROBLES AND as it holds respondent Ong King Guan not liable for the
WILFREDO ROBLES, monetary awards specified in the June 26, 2015 Order is
hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The June 26, 2015
ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS. Order of the Department of Labor and Employment,
National Capital Region, finding respondent Ong King
Guan solidarily liable to pay the employees named in the
G.R No. 237486 -
PHILCO AERO, INC.,* Order the amount ofPhp1,440,641.39 is hereby
PETITIONER, v. REINSTATED.
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION Costs against respondents.
SECRETARY ARTHUR
P. TUGADE, BASES SO ORDERED.
CONVERSION AND
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, Bersamin, C.J., Jardeleza, Gesmundo, and Carandang,

VIVENCIO B. DIZON, JJ., concur.
MEGAWIDE
CONSTRUCTION
CORP., AND GMR
Endnotes:
INFRASTRUCTURE
LTD., DOING
1Rollo, pp. 10-27.
BUSINESS AS JOINT
VENTURERS UNDER
THE NAME AND STYLE 2 Id. at 30-50: penned by Associate Justice
OF MEGAWIDE-GMR, Elihu A. Ybañez and concurred in by Associate
RESPONDENTS. Justices Magdangal M. De Leon and Carmelita
Salandanan Manahan.
G.R. No. 216574 -
FACT-FINDING 3 Id. at 62-102; penned by Regional Director
INVESTIGATION Alex V. Avila.
BUREAU (FFIB) -
OFFICE OF THE 4 In the Matter of the General Labor
DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN
Standards and Occupational Safety and
FOR THE MILITARY
Health Investigation at Kentex Manufacturing
AND OTHER LAW
Corporation located at No. 6159 Tatalon
ENFORCEMENT
Street, Brgy. Ugong, Mapulang Lupa,
OFFICES,
Valenzuela City.
PETITIONER, v.
RENATO P. MIRANDA,
5 While they were not able to interview
RESPONDENT.
Kentex representatives and workers, the
team noted the following:
G.R. No. 223624 -
HEIRS OF LEONARDA
1) two plant ingresses were available; 2) the
NADELA TOMAKIN,
foul smell of burnt rubber materials was still
NAMELY: LUCAS
present in the surrounding area, which was
NADELA, OCTAVIO N.
still cordoned by the police; 3) the whole
TOMAKIN, ROMEO N.
plant structure appeared as a warehouse
TOMAKIN, MA.
outside, where vents are only visible on the
CRISTETA* T.
walls at the upper section of the structure,
PANOPIO, AND
which was considered to be the second floor
CRESCENCIO**
of the whole facility; 4) grilled windows were
TOMAKIN, JR.
at the second floor; and 5) the ground floor
(DECEASED),
REPRESENTED BY HIS where the administrative office was once

HEIRS, BARBARA located was also destroyed. Rollo, pp. 31-32.
JEAN R. TOMAKIN
RAFOLS*** AND 6 No. NCR00-TSSD-1505-OSHI-001.
CRISTINA JEAN R.
TOMAKIN, 7 Case No. R003-JA-2015-05-002-6; id. at
PETITIONERS, v.
32.
HEIRS OF CELESTINO
NAVARES, NAMELY:
8 The following deficiencies are as follows: On
ERMINA N. JACA,
general labor standards: 1) Underpayment of
NORMITA NAVARES,
minimum wage under Wage Order No. NCR-
FELINDA N. BALLENA,
18 and Wage Order No. NCR-19 from date of
RHODORA N.
employment to present; 2) Non-payment of
SINGSON, CRISTINA
COLA under Wage Order No. NCR-18 and
N. CAL ORTIZ,
Wage Order No. NCR-19; 3) Non payment of
ROCELYN N. SENCIO,
13th month pay for the year 2014; 4) Non-
JAIME B. NAVARES,
payment of holiday pay and special holiday
CONCHITA N. BAYOT,
premium; 5) Illegal deduction of cash bond
PROCULO NAVARES,
(Php100.00 per week); 6) Non-membership
LIDUVINA N. VALLE,
of workers and therefore non-remittance of
MA. DIVINA N. ABIS,
premiums to SSS, PhilHealth, and PAGIBIG
VENUSTO B. NAVARES
Fund despite deductions on pay; 7) CJC
AND RACHELA N.
Manpower Services is not registered as
TAHIR,
contractor/subcontractor under Department
RESPONDENTS.
Order (D.O.) No. 18-A in Region III; 8) There
is no written service agreement between KMC
G.R. No. 233850 -
and CJC Manpower Services; and 9) There is
TRADE AND
no employment contract between CJC
INVESTMENT
Manpower Services and workers deployed at
DEVELOPMENT
Kentex. On occupational safety and health
CORPORATION OF
standards: 1) Non-registration under Rule
THE PHILIPPINES
1020; 2) Non-submission of annual work
ALSO KNOWN AS
accident/illness exposure data report; 3)
PHILIPPINE EXPORT-
Non-submission of annual medical report; 4)
IMPORT CREDIT
No company policy and program on anti-
AGENCY, PETITIONER,
sexual harassment, drug-free workplace,
v. PHILIPPINE
tuberculosis, hepatitis 8, and HIV-AIDS; id at
VETERANS BANK,
32-33.
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 231361 - 9 Rollo, pp. 54-56.

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, 10 Both Kentex and CJC were ordered to pay
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
jointly and severally the total monetary
v. RESSURRECCION
deficiencies of Php8,389,655.70 to 99
RESSURRECCION Y
workers; id. at 56.
ROBLES,* JONATHAN
MANUEL Y OTIG,
11Rollo, pp. 62-102.
ANICETO DECENA Y
GONZAGA, JERRY
12 In violation of Section 14 of Department
ROBLES Y UNATO,
Order No. 18-A Series of 2011:
ACCUSED, CAROL
ALCANTARA Y MAPATA
Section 14. Mandatory Registration and
AND JOSELITO CRUZ
Registry of Legitimate Contractors.
Y DE GUZMAN,
Consistent with the authority of the Secretary
ACCUSED-
of Labor and Employment to restrict or
APELLANTS.
prohibit the contracting out of labor to protect
the rights of workers, it shall be mandatory
G.R. No. 228951 -
for all persons or entities, including
THE PEOPLE OF THE
cooperatives, acting as contractors to register
PHILIPPINES
with the Regional Office of the Department of
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
Labor and Employment (DOLE) where it
v. JAY GODOY
principally operates.
MANCAO, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
Failure to register shall give rise to the
presumption that the contractor is engaged in
G.R. Nos. 203076-
labor only contracting.
77 - AZUCENA E.
BAYANI, PETITIONER,
Accordingly, the registration system
v. EDUARDO,
governing contracting arrangements and
LEONORA, VIRGILIO,
implemented by the Regional Offices of the
VILMA, CYNTHIA AND
DOLE is hereby established, with the Bureau
NANCY, ALL
of Working Conditions (BWC) as the central
SURNAMED YU AND
registry.
MR. ALFREDO T.
PALLANAN,
13 The computations were for the
RESPONDENTS. [G.R.
NOS. 206765 and underpayment of basic wages, premium pay
207214] HEIRS OF on rest days, COLA, wages on holidays,

CONCEPCION NON overtime pay, night shift differential, 13th
ANDRES, NAMELY: month, and the unauthorized deduction of the
SERGIO, JR., cash bond.
SOFRONIO AND
GRACELDA, ALL 14Rollo, p. 102.
SURNAMED ANDRES,
PETITIONERS, v.
15 Id. at 103-113.
HEIRS OF MELENCIO
YU AND TALINANAP
16 Id. at 114-115.
MATUALAGA, NAMELY:
EDUARDO, LEONORA,
17 Id. at 116-136.
VIRGILIO, VILMA,
CYNTHIA, IMELDA
18 Id. at 30-50.
AND NANCY, ALL
SURNAMED YU; THE
PROVINCIAL SHERIFF 19 N.B. The CA cited Rule XV, Section 1 of
OF GENERAL SANTOS D.O. No. 131-B, Series of 2016, i.e., the
CITY; MR. ALFREDO T. "Revised Rules on Labor Laws Compliance
PALLANAN, IN HIS System," which echoes the same provision
CAPACITY AS DEPUTY cited by the DOLE Regional Director in his
SHERIFF OF THE July 7, 2015 letter that cited Rule II, Section
REGIONAL TRIAL 1 of D.O. 131-13, Series of 2013.
COURT (BRANCH 36),
GENERAL SANTOS 20 Citing Section 31 of the Corporation Code
CITY; AND HON.
Liability of Directors, Trustees or Officers. -
ISAAC ALVERO V. Directors or trustees who willfully and
MORAN, PRESIDING knowingly vote for or assent to patently
JUDGE OF THE
unlawful acts of the corporation or who are
REGIONAL TRIAL
guilty of gross negligence or bad faith in
COURT (BRANCH 36),
directing the affairs of the corporation x x x
GENERAL SANTOS
shall be liable jointly and severally for all
CITY; YARD URBAN damages resulting therefrom suffered by the
HOMEOWNERS corporation, its stockholders or members and
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
other persons.
HEREIN
REPRESENTED BY ITS 21Rollo, pp. 49-50.
PRESIDENT, ROGELIO
ENERO, 22 Id. at 137-141.

RESPONDENTS.
23 Id. at 52-53.
G.R. No. 237553 -
BDO UNIBANK, INC.,
24 The then DOLE Secretary was Rosalinda
PETITIONER, v.
Baldoz.
ANTONIO CHOA,
RESPONDENT.
25 Entitled "Rules on Labor Laws Compliance
System".
G.R. No. 213009 -
BOOKMEDIA PRESS,
26Rollo, p. 44.
INC. AND BENITO J.
BRIZUELA,
27Vivo v. Philippine Amusement and Gaming
PETITIONERS, v.
LEONARDO* Corporation, 721 Phil. 34, 39 (2013).
SINAJON** AND
YANLY ABENIR, 28 582 Phil. 357 (2008).
RESPONDENTS.
29 Id. at 366-367.
G.R No. 232094 -
PARINA R. JABINAL,
PETITIONER, v. HON.
OVERALL DEPUTY
OMBUDSMAN,
Back to Home | Back to Main
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 233781 -

DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT (DOLE),
PETITIONER, v.
KENTEX
MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION AND
ONG KING GUAN,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 205022 -

CARLITO L. MIRANDO,
JR., PETITIONER, v.
PHILIPPINE CHARITY
AND SWEEPSTAKES
OFFICE AND
MANOLITO MORATO,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 242315 -

RIEL ARANAS Y
DIMAALA,
PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 225007 -

SAN MIGUEL FOODS,
INC. AND JAMES A.
VINOYA,
PETITIONERS, v.
ERNESTO RAOUL V.
MAGTUTO,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 220434 -

SM DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
JOANN HIZON, ATTY.
MENA OJEDA, JR.,
AND ROSALINE QUA,
PETITIONERS, v.
TEODORE GILBERT
ANG, RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 209072 -

ARLENE A.
CUARTOCRUZ,
PETITIONER, v.
ACTIVE WORKS, INC.,
AND MA. ISABEL E.

HERMOSA, BRANCH
MANAGER,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 191902 -

MARINO B. DAANG,
PETITIONER, v.
SKIPPERS UNITED
PACIFIC, INC. AND
COMMERCIAL S.A.,
RESPONDENTS.
A.M. No. RTJ-19-

2562 (Formerly A.M.
No. 18-10-234-RTC) -
OFFICE OF THE
COURT
ADMINISTRATOR,
COMPLAINANT, v.
HON. PHILIP G.
SALVADOR
PRESIDING JUDGE,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT OF LAOAG
CITY, ILOCOS NORTE,
BRANCH 13, AND
ACTING PRESIDING
JUDGE, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT OF
BATAC CITY, ILOCOS
NORTE, BRANCH 17,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 212520 -

COCA-COLA
BOTTLERS
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
PETITIONER, v.
ANTONIO P. MAGNO,
JR. AND MELCHOR L.
OCAMPO, JR.,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 232071 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. BBB, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 216949 -

EDUARDO T. BATAC,
PETITIONER, v.
OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN, TEDDY
C. TUMANG, RAFAEL
P. YABUT, AND
PANTALEON C.
MARTIN,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 238299 -

EMMANUELITO LIMBO
Y PAGUIO,
PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 217529 -

DIGITEL EMPLOYEES
UNION, PETITIONER,
v. DIGITAL TELECOMS
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 235662 -

THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. XXX, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 229836 -

THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. XXXXXXXXXXX,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 192956 -

VENUS BATAYOLA
BAGUIO, JUPITER
BATAYOLA, MANUEL
BATAYOLA, JR.,
ISABELO
BATAYOLA,RAMILO
BATAYOLA, RAUL
BATAYOLA,
LEONARDO
BATAYOLA, MILAGROS
BATAYOLA, JULIETA
BATAYOLA
CANTILLAS,
ENRIQUETA
BATAYOLA
ROSACENA,
FELICIANO
BATAYOLA,
ONESEFERO PACINA,
VERONICA
FERNANDEZ
BATAYOLA, LUCIO
HUBAHIB, VICENTA
REVILLA, PERLA
UMBAO, BRIGILDA
MORADAS, AND THE
REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
VII, PETITIONERS, v.
HEIRS OF RAMON
ABELLO, NAMELY: THE
LATE LOLITA ABELLO
DE SEARES,
REPRESENTED BY HER
HEIRS: ROSARIO A.
JIMENEZ,
CANDELARIA A. CHAN
LIM, RAFAEL ABELLO
AND HEIDE ABELLO
CABALUNA, AND THE
LATE EDUARDO
ABELLO,
REPRESENTED BY HIS
HEIRS SANDRA S.
ABELLO AND IAN
GERARD S. ABELLO,
RESPONDENTS.[G.R.
No. 193032] HEIRS
OF RAMON ABELLO,
NAMELY: THE LATE
LOLITA ABELLO DE
SEARES,
REPRESENTED BY HER
HEIRS: ROSARIO A.
JIMENEZ,
CANDELARIA A. CHAN
LIM, RAFAEL ABELLO
AND HEIDE ABELLO
CABALUNA, AND THE
LATE EDUARDO
ABELLO,
REPRESENTED BY HIS
HEIRS SANDRA S.
ABELLO AND IAN
GERARD S. ABELLO,
PETITIONERS, v.
VENUS BATAYOLA
BAGUIO, JUPITER
BATAYOLA, MANUEL
BATAYOLA, JR.,
ISABELO BATAYOLA,
RAMILO BATAYOLA,
RAUL BATAYOLA,
LEONARDO
BATAYOLA, MILAGROS
BATAYOLA, JULIETA
BATAYOLA
CANTILLAS,
ENRIQUETA
BATAYOLA
ROSACENA,
FELICIANO
BATAYOLA,
ONESEFERO PACINA,
VERONICA
FERNANDEZ
BATAYOLA, LUCIO
HUBAHIB, VICENTA
REVILLA, PERLA
UMBAO, BRIGILDA
MORADAS, AND THE
REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
VII, RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 228828 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ZZZ, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 201576 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANALYN
ADVINCULA Y
PIEDAD, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. Nos. 233853-

54 - CAMILO LOYOLA
SABIO (FORMER
CHAIRMAN),
PETITIONER, v.
SANDIGANBAYAN
(FIRST DIVISION),
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 235799 -

JASPER MONROY Y
MORA, PETITIONER,
v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 232338 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. PROMULGATED:
RAMON QUILLO Y
ESMANI, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R No. 242682 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. NERISSA MORA
A.K.A. NERI BALAGTA
MORA AND MARIA
SALOME POLVORIZA,
ACCUSED, NERISSA
MORA A.K.A. NERI
BALAGTA MORA
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 222939 -

MECO MANNING &
CREWING SERVICES,
INC. AND CAPT.
IGMEDIO G.
SORRERA,
PETITIONERS, v.
CONSTANTINO R.
CUYOS,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 221366 -

CITY OF MANILA,
PETITIONER, v.
ALEJANDRO ROCES
PRIETO, BENITO
ROCES PRIETO,
MERCEDES PRIETO
DELGADO, MONICA
LOPEZ PRIETO,
MARTIN LOPEZ
PRIETO, BEATRIZ
PRIETO DE LEON,
RAFAEL ROCES
PRIETO, BENITO
LEGARDA, INC.,
ALEGAR
CORPORATION,
BENITO LEGARDA,
JR., PECHATEN
CORPORATION,
ESTATE OF ROSARIO
M. LLORA, AND ALL
PERSONS CLAIMING
INTERESTS AGAINST
THEM,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 235468 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DAN DUMANJUG Y
LOREÑA,[*]
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 225339 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. xxxxxxxxxxx
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 234531 -

AGUSAN WOOD
INDUSTRIES, INC.,
PETITIONER, v.
SECRETARY OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL
RESOURCES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R No. 219614 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. PONCIANO ESPINA
Y BALASANTOS ALIAS
"JUN ESPINA AND JR",
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 232669 -

COCA-COLA FEMSA
PHILIPPINES,
PETITIONER, v.
RICARDO S.
MACAPAGAL, ENER A.
MANARANG, REMIGIO
E. MERCADO, DANILO
Z. FABIAN, ALBERT P.
TAN, EDUARDO N.
ABULENCIA, JR.,
REYNALDO G.
PINEDA, ERIC A.
ABAD SANTOS,
WILFREDO C. DELA
CRUZ, MANUEL T.
CAPARAS, EDGARDO
R. NAVARRO, NESTOR
L. RAYO, AND
INOCENCIO M. ARAO,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 207152 -

HEIRS OF PABLITO
ARELLANO, NAMELY,
ELENA ARELLANO,
REYNANTE ARELLANO,
AND RUBY ARELLANO,
PETITIONERS, v.
MARIA TOLENTINO,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 226021 -

REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
REPRESENTED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS,
PETITIONER, v.
GILDA[*] A.
BARCELON, HAROLD
A. BARCELON, AND
HAZEL A. BARCELON,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 227960 -

REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES
[REPRESENTED BY
THE DEPARMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS (DPWH)],
PETITIONER, v.
SPOUSES LORENZANA
JUAN DARLUCIO AND
COSME DARLUCIO,
RESPONDENTS.
A.C. No. 10261 -

RUFINA LUY LIM,
COMPLAINANT, v.
ATTY. MANUEL V.
MENDOZA,
RESPONDENT.
G.R No. 238513 -

SPOUSES BELINDA
LIU AND HSI PIN LIU,

PETITIONERS, v.
MARCELINA
ESPINOSA, MARY ANN
M. ESTRADA, ARCHIE
ASUMBRADO, INESITA
ASUMBRADO, LORETO
TUTOR, ELIAS PENAS,
BENITA ABANTAO,
BASILIZA
MARTIZANO, ARMAN
PARAS, MIGUELITO M.
ANTEGA, JOVENTINO
CAHULOGAN, AND
TITO TUBAC,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 240475 -

JONATHAN DE
GUZMAN Y AGUILAR,
PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
A.M. No. P-19-3985

(Formerly OCA I.P.I.
No. 12-3839-P) -
PRECIOUSA
CASTILLO-
MACAPUSO,
COMPLAINANT, v.
ATTY. NELSON B.
CASTILLEJOS, JR.,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF COURT, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT,
CAUAYAN, ISABELA,
RESPONDENT. [A.M.
No. P-19-3986
No. 13-4199-P)]
ANONYMOUS,
COMPLAINANT, v.
PRECIOUSA C.
MACAPUSO, SOCIAL
WELFARE OFFICER II,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF COURT, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, MAKATI
CITY, RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 239331 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. EDSON BARBAC
RETADA ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 236496 -

F.F. CRUZ & CO.,
INC., PETITIONER, v.
JOSE B. GALANDEZ,
DOMINGO I. SAJUELA,
AND MARLON D.
NAMOC,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 238141 -

WILLIAM CRUZ Y
FERNANDEZ AND
VIRGILIO FERNANDEZ
Y TORRES,
PETITIONERS, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 230645 -

TONDO MEDICAL
CENTER,
REPRESENTED BY DR.
MARIA ISABELITA M.
ESTRELLA,
PETITIONER, v.
ROLANDO RANTE,
DOING BUSINESS
UNDER THE NAME
AND STYLE OF
JADEROCK BUILDERS,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 240621 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PETITIONER, v. THE
HONORABLE
SANDIGANBAYAN
(SEVENTH DIVISION)
AND JAIME KISON
RECIO,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 241261 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ALBERT PEREZ
FLORES, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 192366 -

BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
PETITIONER, v.
GARCIA-LIPANA
COMMODITIES,
INC.** AND TLL
REALTY AND
MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 223036 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, v. MIKE
OMAMOS Y PAJO,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 209735 -

STANFILCO - A
DIVISION OF DOLE
PHILIPPINES, INC.
AND REYNALDO
CASINO,
PETITIONERS, v. JOSE
TEQUILLO AND/OR
NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS
COMMISSION -
EIGHTH DIVISION,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 232675 -

MUNICIPALITY OF
DASMARIÑAS,
PETITIONER, v. DR.
PAULO C. CAMPOS,
SUBSTITUTED BY HIS
CHILDREN JOSE
PAULO CAMPOS,
PAULO CAMPOS, JR.,
AND ENRIQUE
CAMPOS,
RESPONDENTS.[G.R.
No. 233078]
NATIONAL HOUSING
AUTHORITY,
PETITIONER, v. DR.
PAULO C. CAMPOS,
SUBSTITUTED BY HIS
CHILDREN JOSE
PAULO CAMPOS,
PAULO CAMPOS, JR.,
AND ENRIQUE
CAMPOS,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 194403 -

SPOUSES HIPOLITO
DALEN, SR. AND FE G.
DALEN, EVERLISTA
LARIBA AND THE
MINOR BEVERLY T.
LARIBA, MAGDALENA
F. MARPAGA AND THE
MINORS MIKE
ANTHONY AND
THOMIE MAE, BOTH
SURNAMED MARPAGA,
AGNES C. MOLINA
AND THE MINORS
SHEILA, SIMOUN,
STEPHEN JOHN AND
SHARON ANN, ALL
SURNAMED MOLINA,
EMMA C. NAVARRO
AND THE MINORS
RAYMOND, MARAH,
AND RYAN ALL
SURNAMED NAVARRO,
RUTH T. SULAM AND
THE MINOR JEINAR
REECE T. SULAM,
PETITIONERS, v.
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES
DIAMOND CAMELLA,
S.A., RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 230778 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JUAN CREDO Y DE
VERGARA AND
DANIEL CREDO Y DE
VERGARA ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.
G.R. No. 231007 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANTONIO MARTIN Y
ISON, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 229833 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. WILLIAM CEPEDA Y
DULTRA* AND LOREN
DY Y SERO, ACCUSED,
LOREN DY Y SERO,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 234446 -

VICTORIA
MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION
EMPLOYEES UNION,
PETITIONER, v.
VICTORIA
MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 218434 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-
APPELLEE,VS. PILAR
BURDEOS Y OROPA,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R No. 241697 -

CITY OF DAVAO AND
BELLA LINDA N.
TANJILI, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS CITY TREASURER
OF DAVAO CITY,
PETITIONERS, v.
RANDY ALLIED
VENTURES, INC.,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 229037 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ELVIE BALTAZAR Y
CABARUBIAS A.K.A
"KAREN," ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 240254 -

RODESSA QUITEVIS
RODRIGUEZ,
PETITIONER, v.
SINTRON SYSTEMS,
INC. AND/OR
JOSELITO CAPAQUE,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 234429 -

SPOUSES FELIPE
PARINGIT AND
JOSEFA PARINGIT,
PETITIONERS, v.
MARCIANA PARINGIT
BAJIT, ADOLIO
PARINGIT,* AND
ROSARIO PARINGIT
ORDOÑO,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 235739 -

EDWIN DEL ROSARIO,
PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 241254 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ARMIE NARVAS Y
BOLASOC, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
A.M. No. 17-12-02-

SC - RE:
CONSULTANCY
SERVICES OF HELEN
P. MACASAET
G.R. No. 229983 -

FARMER-
BENEFICIARIES
BELONGING TO THE
SAMAHANG
MAGBUBUKID NG
BAGUMBONG,
JALAJALA,[*] RIZAL,
[**] REPRESENTED BY
THEIR PRESIDENT,
TORIBIO M.
MALABANAN,
PETITIONERS, v.
HEIRS OF JULIANA
MARONILLA,
REPRESENTED BY
ATTY. RAMON M.
MARONILLA,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 225789 -

THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ALTANTOR DELA
TORRE Y CABALAR
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 216754 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. HAVIB GALUKEN Y
SAAVEDRA,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 242160 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JAN JAN TAYAN Y
BALVIRAN AND AIZA

SAMPA Y OMAR,
ACCUSED, AIZA
SAMPA Y OMAR,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 228739 -

ROSEMARIE ERIBAL
BOWDEN,
REPRESENTED BY
FLORENCIO C.
ERIBAL, SR.,
PETITIONER, v.
DONALD WILLIAM
ALFRED BOWDEN,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 225190 -

EFREN J. JULLEZA,
PETITIONER, v.
ORIENT LINE
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
ORIENT NAVIGATION
CORPORATION AND
MACARIO DELA
PEÑA,*
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 224651 -

CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION AND
THE OFFICE OF THE
SOLICITOR GENERAL,
PETITIONERS, v.
EDGAR B.
CATACUTAN,
RESPONDENT. [G.R.
No. 224656] EDGAR
B. CATACUTAN,
PETITIONER, v. CIVIL
SERVICE
COMMISSION AND
THE OFFICE OF THE
SOLICITOR GENERAL,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 202097 -

DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION,[1]
PETITIONER, v. RIZAL
TEACHERS KILUSANG
BAYAN FOR CREDIT,
INC., REPRESENTED
BY TOMAS L. ODULLO,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 229339 -

GLOBE ASIATIQUE
REALTY HOLDINGS
CORPORATION,
PETITIONER, v.
UNION BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 232006 -

IN RE: THE WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS FOR
MICHAEL LABRADOR
ABELLANA
(PETITIONER,
DETAINED AT THE
NEW BILIBID
PRISONS,
MUNTINLUPA CITY), v.
HON. MEINRADO P.
PAREDES, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS
PRESIDING JUDGE,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT OF CEBU CITY
BRANCH 13, PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
S/SUPT BENJAMIN
DELOS SANTOS
(RET.), IN HIS
CAPACITY AS CHIEF
OF BUREAU OF
CORRECTIONS,
RESPONDENTS.
A.M. No. P-10-2790

[Formerly A.M. No.
10-3-55-RTC] -
OFFICE OF THE
COURT
ADMINISTRATOR,
COMPLAINANT, v.
PEARL JOY D.
ZORILLA, CASH
CLERK III, OFFICE OF
THE CLERK OF
COURT, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, DIGOS
CITY, DAVAO DEL
SUR, RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 227482 -

JOAQUIN BERBANO,
TRINIDAD BERBANO,
AND MELCHOR
BERBANO,
PETITIONERS, v.
HEIRS OF ROMAN
TAPULAO, NAMELY:
ALBERT D. TAPULAO,*
DANILO D.
TAPULAO,** MARIETA
TAPULAO-REYES,
LINDA TAPULAO-
RAMIREZ, AND
JOSEFINA TAPULAO-
DACANAY,
REPRESENTED BY
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
JOSEFINA TAPULAO-
DACANAY,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 226369 -

ISABELA-I ELECTRIC
COOP., INC.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
GENERAL MANAGER,
ENGR. VIRGILIO L.
MONTANO,
PETITIONER, v.
VICENTE B. DEL
ROSARIO, JR.,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 238334 -

THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ROSELINE KASAN Y
ATILANO AND HENRY
LLACER Y JAO,
ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.
A.C. No. 11830 -

SPOUSES NERIE S.
ASUNCION AND
CRISTITA B.
ASUNCION,
COMPLAINANTS, v.
ATTY. EDILBERTO P.
BASSIG,
RESPONDENT.
G.R No. 196455 -

CENTENNIAL
TRANSMARINE INC.,
EDUARDO R. JABLA,
CENTENNIAL
MARITIME SERVICES
& M/T ACUSHNET,
PETITIONERS, v.
EMERITO E. SALES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. Nos. 220526-

27 - PNOC
DEVELOPMENT AND
MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION
(PDMC) PETITIONER,
v. GLORIA V. GOMEZ,
RESPONDENT.
G.R No. 229928 -

THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DEXTER ASPA
ALBINO @ TOYAY AND
JOHN DOES,
ACCUSED; DEXTER
ASPA ALBINO @
TOYAY, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 228819 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JEFFREY SANTIAGO
Y MAGTULOY,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
A.M. No. P-19-3972

No. 12 3971-P) -
ATTY. LEANIE
GALVEZ-JISON,
COMPLAINANT, v.
MAY N. LASPIÑAS[*]
AND MAE VERCILLE H.
[**] NALLOS,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 231875 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. CORAZON
NAZARENO Y
FERNANDEZ @
"CORA" AND
JEFFERSON
NAZARENO Y
FERNANDEZ @
"TOTO," ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.
G.R. Nos. 191611-

14 - LIBRADO M.
CABRERA AND FE M.
CABRERA,
PETITIONERS, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 226065 -

HEIRS OF SOLEDAD
ALIDO, PETITIONERS,
v. FLORA CAMPANO,
OR HER
REPRESENTATIVES
AND THE REGISTER
OF DEEDS, PROVINCE
OF ILOILO,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 237063 -

FRANCIVIEL* DERAMA
SESTOSO,
PETITIONER, v.
UNITED PHILIPPINE
LINES, INC.,
CARNIVAL CRUISE
LINES, FERNANDINO
T. LISING,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 226907 -

GERARDO A.
ELISCUPIDEZ,
PETITIONER, v.
GLENDA C.
ELISCUPIDEZ,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 223512 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANTONIO
ALMOSARA,*
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 227195 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. FABIAN MABALATO
@ "BOY," JULIO
CARTUCIANO AND
ALLAN CANATOY @
"ALLAN EDWARD,"
ACCUSED, ALLAN
CANATOY @ "ALLAN
EDWARD," ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 239635 -

THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JOSE BENNY
VILLOJAN, JR. Y
BESMONTE ALIAS
"JAY-AR," ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 222916 -

HEIRS OF SPOUSES
GERVACIO A.
RAMIREZ AND
MARTINA CARBONEL,
REPRESENTED BY
CESAR S. RAMIREZ
AND ELMER R.
ADUCA, PETITIONERS,
v. JOEY ABON AND
THE REGISTER OF
DEEDS OF NUEVA
VIZCAYA,
RESPONDENTS.
A.C. No. 9298

[formerly CBD Case
No. 12-3504] -
PRESIDING JUDGE
AIDA ESTRELLA
MACAPAGAL,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT, BR. 195,
PARAÑAQUE CITY,
COMPLAINANT, v.
ATTY. WALTER T.
YOUNG,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 242852 -

CONSOLACION P.
CHAVEZ, CONNIE P.
CHAVEZ, CARLA
HORTENSIA C.
ADELANTAR,
CARMELA P. CHAVEZ,
CRESENTE P. CHAVEZ,
JR., AND CECILIA C.
GIBE, HEREIN
REPRESENTED BY HER
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
CARLA P. CHAVEZ,*
PETITIONERS, v.
MAYBANK
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 205260 -

C/INSP. RUBEN
LIWANAG, SR. Y
SALVADOR,
PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 212938 -

THE HEIRS OF
ALFREDO CULLADO,
[*] NAMELY LOLITA
CULLADO,
DOMINADOR
CULLADO, ROMEO
CULLADO, NOEL
CULLADO, REBECCA
LAMBINICIO, MARY
JANE BAUTISTA AND
JIMMY CULLADO,
PETITIONERS, v.
DOMINIC V.
GUTIERREZ,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 232863 -

GOVERNMENT
SERVICE INSURANCE
SYSTEM, PETITIONER,
v. MUNICIPAL
AGRARIAN REFORM
OFFICER ROMERICO
DATOY,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 212885 -

SPOUSES NOLASCO
FERNANDEZ AND
MARICRIS
FERNANDEZ,
PETITIONERS, v.
SMART
COMMUNICATIONS,
INC., RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 221571 -

LAND BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PETITIONER, v.
ORLANDO R.
BALDOZA AND HEIRS
OF SPOUSES JAIME R.
BALDOZA AND
VIOLETA BALDOZA,
NAMELY: VINCENT
BALDOZA, JUAN
BALDOZA, CATHERINE
BALDOZA, JOAN
BALDOZA* AND
GIRLIE BALDOZA,**
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 241834 -

FERNANDO B.
ARAMBULLO,[*]
PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.
A.C. No. 8911 - IN

RE: ATTY. ROMULO P.
ATENCIA: REFERRAL
BY THE COURT OF
APPEALS OF A
LAWYER'S UNETHICAL
CONDUCT AS
INDICATED IN ITS
DECISION DATED
JANUARY 31, 2011 IN
CA-G.R. CR-HC NO.
03322 (PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES V.
AURORA TATAC, ET
AL.).
A.C. No. 7389 -

VANTAGE LIGHTING
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
JOHN PAUL
FAIRCLOUGH AND MA.
CECILIA G. ROQUE,
COMPLAINANTS, v.
ATTY. JOSE A. DIÑO,
JR., RESPONDENT.
[A.C. No. 10596, July
2, 2019] ATTY. JOSE
A. DIÑO, JR.,
COMPLAINANT, v.
ATTYS. PARIS G. REAL
AND SHERWIN G.
REAL, RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 239727 -

SPS. JULIAN BELVIS,
SR., AND CECILIA
BELVIS, SPS. JULIAN
E. BELVIS, JR., AND
JOCELYN BELVIS,
SPS. JULIAN E.
BELVIS III AND ELSA
BELVIS, AND JOUAN
E. BELVIS,
PETITIONERS, v. SPS.
CONRADO V. EROLA
AND MARILYN EROLA,
AS REPRESENTED BY
MAUREEN* FRIAS,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 213156 -

MARIO C. TAN AND
ERLINDA S. TAN,
PETITIONERS, v.
UNITED COCONUT
PLANTERS BANK,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 211044 -

JACQUES A.
DUPASQUIER AND
CARLOS S. RUFINO
FOR THEMSELVES
AND ON BEHALF OF
THE NET GROUP,
COMPOSED OF 19-1
REALTY
CORPORATION, 18-2
PROPERTY HOLDINGS,
INC., 6-3 PROPERTY
HOLDINGS INC., ADD
LAND, INC.,
REMEDIOS A.
DUPASQUIER, PIERRE
DUPASQUIER, ANNA
MARIE
MORRONGIELLO,
DELRUF REALTY &
DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
VAR BUILDINGS, INC.,
MARILEX REALTY,
ARESAR REALTY,
SUNVAR, INC.,
MACARIO S. RUFINO,
REMIGIO TAN, JR.,
MA. AUXILIO R.
PRIETO, MA. PAZ R.
TANJANCO, RAMON D.
RUFINO, PAOLO R.
PRIETO, VICENTE L.
RUFINO, THERESA P.
VALDES, ALEXANDRA
P. ROMUALDEZ,
TERESA R. TAN,
JAVIER VICENTE
RUFINO, CARLO D.
RUFINO, LUIS CARLO
R. LAUREL, MA.
ASUNCION L.
UICHICO, MA. PAZ
FARAH L. IMPERIAL,
MA. ISABEL L.
BARANDIARAN,
ALFREDO PARUNGAO,
AND ALOYSIUS B.
COLAYCO,
PETITIONERS, v.
ASCENDAS
(PHILIPPINES)
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 223318 -

CESAR V. PURISIMA,
IN HIS CAPACITY AS
SECRETARY OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE AND
EMMANUEL F. DOOC,
IN HIS CAPACITY AS
INSURANCE
COMMISSIONER,
PETITIONERS, v.
SECURITY PACIFIC
ASSURANCE
CORPORATION,
VISAYAN SURETY &
INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
FINMAN GENERAL
ASSURANCE
CORPORATION,
MILESTONE
GUARANTY &
ASSURANCE
CORPORATION, R&B
INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
INDUSTRIAL
INSURANCE COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
PHILIPPINE PHOENIX
SURETY & INSURANCE
INCORPORATED,
MERCANTILE
INSURANCE COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
GREAT DOMESTIC
INSURANCE COMPANY
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
INCORPORATED, AND
INSURANCE OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R No. 239416 -

MELCHOR J.
CHIPOCO, CHRISTY C.
BUGANUTAN,
CERIACO P. SABIJON,
THELMA F. ANTOQUE,
GLENDA G. ESLABON,
AND AIDA P.
VILLAMIL,
PETITIONERS, v. THE
HONORABLE OFFICE
OF THE OMBUDSMAN,
REPRESENTED BY
HONORABLE
CONCHITA CARPIO-
MORALES, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS TANODBAYAN,
HONORABLE
RODOLFO M. ELMAN,
IN HIS OFFICIAL
CAPACITY AS DEPUTY
OMBUDSMAN FOR
MINDANAO,
HONORABLE HILDE C.
DELA CRUZ-LIKIT, IN
HER OFFICIAL
CAPACITIES AS
GRAFT
INVESTIGATION AND
PROSECUTION
OFFICER III AND
OFFICER-IN-CHARGE,
EVALUATION AND
INVESTIGATION
BUREAU-A, OFFICE OF
THE OMBUDSMAN-
MINDANAO, AND
HONORABLE JAY M.
VISTO, IN HIS
OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS GRAFT
INVESTIGATION AND
PROSECUTION
OFFICER II, AND
ROBERTO R. GALON,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 209274 -

THE HONORABLE
OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN,
PETITIONER, v.
ANGELINE A. ROJAS,
RESPONDENT.; G.R.
NOS. 209296-97 -
JOSE PEPITO M.
AMORES, M.D.,
PETITIONER, v.
ANGELINE A. ROJAS
AND ALBILIO C.
CANO,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 237246 -

HAYDEN KHO, SR.,
PETITIONER, v.
DOLORES G.
MAGBANUA, MARILYN
S. MERCADO,
ARCHIMEDES B.
CALUB, MARIA E.
ONGOTAN,
FRANCISCO J. DUQUE,
MERLE G. RIVERA,
DOLORES A. PULIDO,
PAULINO R.
BALANGATAN, JR.,
ANAFEL L.
ESCROPOLO,
PERCIVAL A. DEINLA,
JERRY C. ZABALA,
ROGELIO C.
ONGONION, JR.,
HELEN B. DELA CRUZ,
CENON JARDIN, AND
ROVILLA L. CATALAN,
RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 219772 -

OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN,
PETITIONER, v.
P/SUPT. CRISOSTOMO
P. MENDOZA,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 193136 -

ABS-CBN
BROADCASTING
CORPORATION,
PETITIONER, v.
HONORATO C.
HILARIO,
SUBSTITUTED BY
GLORIA Z. HILARIO,
AND DINDO B.
BANTING,
RESPONDENTS.
A.C. No. 4178 -

PEDRO LUKANG,
COMPLAINANT, v.
ATTY. FRANCISCO R.
LLAMAS,
RESPONDENT.
G.R No. 231839 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. MICHAEL RYAN
ARELLANO Y
NAVARRO, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 241946 -

PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ELEVER JAEN Y
MORANTE, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
Copyright © 1995 - 2020 REDiaz

Dole V Kentex MFTG

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dole V Kentex MFTG

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2/19/2020 G.R. No. 233781 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT (DOLE), PETITIONER, v.

KENTEX MANUFACTURING CORPORATION …

Home Law Firm Law Library Laws Jurisprudence

July 2019 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions

Philippine Supreme Court

G.R. No. 233781 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND

G.R. No. 233781, July 08, 2019

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT

DEL CASTILLO, J.:

2015 Order3 rendered by the DOLE-National Capital

ACCUSED-APPELLANT. the factory located in Valenzuela City owned by Kentex.

G.R. No. 223434 - workers. As part of its standard procedures, personnel of

BERNADETH ALBINO, (DOLE CAMANAVA) Field Office went to Kentex's

IN REPRESENTATION premises.5 For its part, the DOLE-NCR also assessed6

LICNACHAN, MARTHA CJC, which deployed workers to Kentex, was an

G.R. No. 239986 - WHEREFORE, premises considered, Kentex

v. ANSARI SARIP Y On July 3, 2015, only Ong moved for reconsideration of

Petition17 assailing the (1) June 8, 2015 Compliance

BUTUAN CITY, assailed orders had become final and executory.

GENEVIEVE ROSAL final and executory, there being no appeal made or

"GENEVIEVE ARREZA could no longer alter the subject Order.

Here, instead of filing an appeal with the DOLE

PETITIONER, v. Neither was there merit in respondents' claim that they

PREYSLER, JR., where their side was sufficiently heard. It is axiomatic

Thus, it is self-evident that the CA committed serious

G.R. No. 233697 - erroneous, is no longer subject to change or

G.R. No. 227899 - maintained by those who exercise the power

AUTHORITY, Bersamin, C.J., Jardeleza, Gesmundo, and Carandang,

REPRESENTED BY HIS where the administrative office was once

G.R. No. 231361 - 9 Rollo, pp. 54-56.

207214] HEIRS OF on rest days, COLA, wages on holidays,

ENERO, 22 Id. at 137-141.

G.R. No. 233781 -

G.R No. 205022 -

G.R. No. 242315 -

G.R. No. 225007 -

G.R. No. 220434 -

G.R. No. 209072 -

AND MA. ISABEL E.

G.R. No. 191902 -

A.M. No. RTJ-19-

G.R. No. 212520 -

G.R. No. 232071 -

G.R. No. 216949 -

G.R. No. 238299 -

G.R. No. 217529 -

G.R. No. 235662 -

G.R. No. 229836 -

G.R. No. 192956 -

G.R. No. 228828 -

G.R. No. 201576 -

G.R. Nos. 233853-

G.R. No. 235799 -

G.R. No. 232338 -

G.R No. 242682 -

G.R. No. 222939 -

G.R. No. 221366 -

G.R. No. 235468 -

G.R. No. 225339 -

G.R. No. 234531 -

G.R No. 219614 -

G.R. No. 232669 -

G.R No. 207152 -