Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Environment monitoring................................. 3
2. Ground-based environment monitoring......... 7
3. Remote sensing for environment monitoring 35
Lithosphere
Biosphere
(Soil,
(Biota)
sediment)
• Soil erosion
• Soil salinization • Biodiversity loss
• Land cover change • Extinction
• Function degradation
• Persistent pollutant
• Solid/hazardous waste
3/18/2019 ED 78.08 Environment Quality Management 4
Environment Monitoring Method
Air concentration
Atmospheric
Emission
process
Deposition/
Natural – geologic, biogenic Transport – local, regional, global precipitation load
Anthropogenic – point, Transform – physical, chemical,
area, volume, mobile, etc. biological
Primary pollutants
• Carbon oxides (CO, CO2)
• Nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, or NOx)
• Sulfur oxides (SO2)
• VOCs
• Particle pollution (PM10 and PM2.5, Pb and other heavy metals)
Secondary pollutants
• Sulfuric acid, nitric acid, ozone, formaldehydes, etc.
• Monitoring networks
mobile >> stationary
manual >> automated
intermittent >> real time
• Modeling and prediction
• Community engagement
Air quality index
Online real time info.
Physical parameters
• Suspended solids, color, temperature, turbidity, conductivity, density, odor
and taste, etc.
Chemical parameters
• BOD, COD, DO, pH, alkalinity and acidity, total organic carbon, hardness,
chloride, pesticides, heavy meatal, nitrogen and phosphorous, etc.
Biological parameters
• Chlorophyll, total coliform bacteria, Fecal coliform bacteria, Ecoli, etc.
Water quality standards serve as the foundation for the water quality based
approach to pollution control and are a fundamental component of water
management
Types of water quality standards:
• Stream/water body quality standards, e.g., surface water quality standard,
ground water quality standard
• Effluent quality standard, e.g., municipal wastewater discharge standard,
industrial effluent standard
• Water supply / drinking water standard
UNEP/GEMS/WATER program
80 countries with more than 3000 stations
Provide annual means of the SDG 6.3.2 core parameters
dissolved oxygen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and pH
in rivers, lakes and reservoirs.
Assess inherent soil quality and susceptibility to Not stated Regional and national Rating procedures with
change (policy) respect to 4 soil functions
USA Soil management assessment framework Evaluate management practices, educate about soil Land managers, advisors, Plot scale Scoring curves, additive
(SMAF) quality general public index
Cornell Soil Health Test Assess soil health, address soil degradation, increase Farmers Plot scale Scoring curves, overall score
productivity
Australia Soil Quality Website Benchmark sites, soil quality monitoring and Farmers National and regional Target values; threshold
education values wherever possible
New Zealand “500 soils project”, soil indicator Assess soil quality for environmental reporting Government; Sindi: 511 sites across New Comparative (compared to
assessment (Sindi) regional council staff, Zealand, x soil types, 10 land database) or according to
landowners uses target ranges
France Observatoire de la Qualité des Sols Assess soil quality for environmental protection, food Not stated 11 sites (OQS) Mainly trend analysis
(OQS), Réseau des mesures de la qualité security and sustainable management practices (policy) 2000 sites (RMQS)
des sols (RMQS)
UK Assess soil function of environmental interaction Policy National Trigger values
Ireland Soil quality assessment research project Assessment of soil functions Farmers Plot (38 farms)
(SQARE)
The National Soil Quality Monitoring Network Assess soil quality and land-use effects Not stated 200 locations Target values
Netherlands (policy)
EU European Soil Monitoring and Provide objective, reliable and comparable Policy
Assessment framework information at European level
ENVASSO, RECARE Assess soil degradation Policy
Source: Bünemann et al., 2018
Systematic sampling
Random sampling
• Arbitrary collection of samples – each sample in the population has the same probability of
being chosen
• Preferred sampling used to select each sampling point independently form of the other
points
• Variable approaches to improve representativeness of random sampling
Simple random sampling Stratified random sampling Restricted random sampling Systematical sampling
- each sampling unit has the same likelihood of being selected, and
- the selection of one sampling unit does not influence the selection of any other sampling unit.
- it does not take into account variability caused by other measurable factors (e.g., aspect, soils, elevation)
- it can yield high variance estimates and make detection of differences difficult if the population being sampled is
not evenly distributed throughout the sample area.
- it can be an inefficient means of sampling because of the time required to visit all of the sample sites by
chance, some areas may be heavily sampled while other areas are not sampled at all
3/18/2019 ED 78.08 Environment Quality Management 29
Random Sampling
Simple random sampling Stratified random sampling Restricted random sampling Systematical sampling
- Stratification is the process of dividing a set of sampling units into one or more subgroups prior to
selection of units for sampling.
- it increases efficiency of sampling over simple random sampling when the variable of interest responds
differently to some clearly definable features.
Simple random sampling Stratified random sampling Restricted random sampling Systematical sampling
- The area to be sampled is divided up into large segments based on the number of sampling units needed to
meet monitoring objectives. Within each segment, a single sampling unit is then selected (i.e., a single
sampling location is selected) at random.
- good dispersion of sampling points across an area
- more efficient sampling than simple random sampling
- Easy to implement with GIS tools
Data acquisition (Laboratory or survey? First hand or second hand? Hard copy or digital? Small
volume or big data? )
Data storage and quality control
Data analysis and interpretation (statistical analysis)
Basic statistical tools (central trends, distribution and dispersion)
Hypothesis testing tools
Correlation and regression tools
Spatial analysis tools
Temporal analysis tools
Other advanced
Visualization
Table
Graph
Map
•Proper technic & • Defined method - • Standard method & • Data 'double
procedure temperature, procedure recorded'
•Proper equipment duration, • Proper equipment • Data double
& calibration contaminant & calibration checking or cross
•Proper record & prevention • Laboratory blanks checking
labeling • Proper record • Replicated analysis
•replicated sampling • Proper record &
•Field blanks labeling
• Environmental monitoring
• Urbanization & Transportation
• Natural resource management
• Agriculture
• Geology
• National security
• Meteorology
• Medical application
• Space science
Spectral bands of remote sensor - limited range of values the sensor is set to
detect along a spectrum
3/18/2019 ED 78.08 Environment Quality Management 43
Spectral Signatures
• Conflict between
spatial resolution and
temporal resolution
due to technical
limitation
• Proper resolution
should be determined
according to
application goal
Geographic
Denotes the concept of spatial location on Earth’s surface
Importance of relative location
Theories and techniques in geography for, the basis of GIS
Information
Systems
Computer systems and programs that help to answer questions about the Earth
Aspatial data – data not tied to a location or the Spatial data – data associated with a location on
earth’s surface (no geographic attribute) earth (with geographic attribute)
1. Data management
• Manage various types of data including vector, raster, images, table, etc.
• Manage large amount of data (global scale with high data resolution)
2. Data analysis
• Spatially aware data
• Arribute with spatial distribution
• Proximity and overlay
• Advanced geo-processing techniques
• Flexible, customization
3. Data visualization
• Map! Map! Map!
The areas of orchard, beet, cotton and wheat reduces 2/3 from 2010 to 2017 Source: Jia et al., 2019