To support the written paper, the project requirements specify that students also submit the

entire annual reports for both companies being analyzed, that the papers contain page references to

the relevant portions of the financial statements, and that the relevant portions be highlighted. These
Global Perspectives on Accounting Education Misch and Galantine 85
87
89
91
93
95
96
A
84Financial Statement
86
88
90
92
94
requirements Analysisthe
greatly facilitate Project for Introductory
grading Financial
process, as they make itAccounting
easy for faculty to verify the data
Volume 6, 2009, 83-96
4. team
!presentation
of The relative
effect
The
Analyze
interactions
otherofisperformance
your
major
determined
professorbase
(#13),
acquisitions
company’s
with
announces
of
by the most
the
PROJECTor
two
importance
of
investing
divestitures
group
companies’
INTRODUCTIONtheOVERVIEW
REFERENCES
APPENDIX others
assignments
andof43on
2 rating
the
financing
equity
revenues,
items
the
near
shares
project
activities
discussed,
the
expenses,
on end asthe for
“neutral”
ofthe
stock
aor
theclass
professionalism
netmost
market;
in
session,
income.
these
recent categories.
thenyear of
allows
asthe
included in the paper, if they so choose. TABLE
Both of 1the facultycurrentlyemploying the project do verify
!groups
Accounting
Project Thehis relative
ten paperminutes
RequirementsEducation
rankings
presents to discuss
Change
ofa thefinancial companies
their
FINDING Commission.
statement
industry
GRADING ANNUAL onpreferences
customer
1990.
analysis
RUBRIC REPORTS Objectives
project
satisfaction
and tothat write
of surveys
Education
has theirbeen preferences
and used
for
in market
Accountants:
for more onshare; anthan index a
Common
team’s
The As
students may
analyses
identified
presentation, be
wereinmore seenincluded
theand in the
statement
neutral in
assignment
the
the responsiveness
TEAM with balance
ofEVALUATION
regard sheet
cash flows, sheet included
toofthe section
team
specifically
project’s
FORM in
membersinclude
Appendix
influence
identifying discussion
1,
to questions. the
onthe theirproject
of:
two requires
communication
largest investing studentsskills
all
The
Please
You ofwritten
the data included instability
athe written paper, and have found that the grading 2)process generally

T
!card. The are
Position
The submit
decaderequired
relative projects
professor aquality
Statement
FINANCIALin 2ato page turn
are
university’s
then and review
worth
Number
selects
STATEMENT copy of
90(by the
introductory
One.
the points
of
#
of both
process
of
industry
Issues
ANALYSIScompany and
studentscompanies’
will
that
financial
infrom be
Accountingyour
management;
PROJECT among graded
responding) annual
team
accounting those
SURVEY in
followed
Educationreports
two
andrequested
courses.
RESULTS phases: with
in completing
(Vol. The5,your
(based
No. group
primary the
on307-312. project.
project
suitability)
goal of the Thefor
and
by
!to The
(#11 A FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
requiring
obtain
andlevel annual
activities
#12), students
andwhich percentage
reports
and themay to:
two analyze
forreflect
two
changes
largest key
companies
the
financing aspects
inteam-based
cash,inactivities. of
inventory,
a given a company’s
nature industry-one
working
Discuss of the financial
capital,
whether to serve
project, youfixeddisclosures;
as
asagree assets,
the the or“base
students evaluate
and company”
disagree debt;
with with a
the
!5.
American
requires
this
best
!e-mails
Albrecht, First, Identify
class.
way
Theproject the Accounting
importance
students projects
approximately
to
Your obtain
W.S.isand 2 (two)
review of
R.listJ. will
annual Association,
items
45
should
toadevelopstudents’technical,
determining
of
Sack. be not
minutes
reports
allowable reviewed
include
2000.whether included
Committee
per
is a
Accountingto
companies. for
project.in
description
request compliance
(or
an investor on
Thederived
them the
of:
analytical,critical
Education:
Groups 1) Future
verificationwith
from)
directly
the
is looking
thenChartingway the
Structure,
the
process
from
e-mail that
thinking
forthe basic
financial
the
short-term
their Course requirements
teamContent,
could
company.
and choices statements
be
was
communication
through
returns and
undertaken
organized
You
to the or and
Scope
that
may
a Perilous
long-term
instructor, for
you
find
(wasof
skills a
by
company’s
!and
strongest The one trend
the financial
tocommunication
serve
in theascurrent,
investing decisions;
the
and aciddiscuss
“comparison
financing
skills test,
may strategies
have RESULTS
non-financial
debt-to-assets,
company.” taken that Then, items
and
responsibility
your students
company thatforaffect
debt-to-equity are
appears a company’s
required
preparing ratios;
to be
the finalability
toemploying.
analyze drafts keyto be
trends
of the
Along with emphasizing the importance of accounting disclosures ingroups
decision-making, the
!teaching
there
company’s
with PROJECT FOR INTRODUCTORY
The relationship
In
At
a “team
Future.
growth.
each
This
the
the
AccountingEducation
composition.
think past,
assistant,
group beginning
would
contact Any
leader,”
(Sarasota,
paper
a between
third
be
which
beingFl:
has
projects professor
of
important
(The
information
were
assigned would
American
presented
the
changes
there Bedford most
submitted chose
to
significantly
regular
a unique on its
Accounting
a
in recent
receivables
CONCLUSION
someone the
Committee).
without
team
company,
group-based
industry
semester
reduce
website considering
the
meetings?);
Association).
andor
1986.
the for
inventory
entire
(usually
financial
completed,
the
Future
amount
first 2) class,
annual
whether
the
responders
statement
and
of allowed
Accounting
in contribution the
reports changes
faculty
an SEC to professors
beinginvest
for
analysis
in
Education:
time both
Filings inrevenues;
to in choose
companies
your
required.
that preference.
given each each
or Investor
project
Preparing
company.
member
that
of
a base
beingthe
Once
was
of
successful;
!in the
papers Thebase and/or compare
relationship
company’spreparing one
between company
incomethe cash statement to another
and investments,
presentations. and in the
balance
Overall, same
cashsheet and industry;
thecurrent
accounts, and
surveyliabilities, make
to discuss and
and defend
the
investments investment
base company’s and
project
!company
introductoryfinancial The meets
relationship
from the
a list calls
between
(flipping
accountingfrom increases
a bothcoin
classes academics
in
to fixed
gave
determine assets andboth
students and practitioners
which a survey
a company’s
group to inresults
determine
would various
desire
and
receiveto how
the
business
expandamany
comments
company fields
operations;
of them
in
withfor the
had
the
Relations/Information
each group has been assigned a company, for
discussed,
teamthe
Discuss
In Expanding
addition
(including without
your to reasons
Profession.
appropriate
faculty
yourself)
tab). You for
evaluations
made Issues
believing
should page
to in
the
Marilyn the references
of
request Accounting
that
the
project these
papers to Education
two
the relevant
items (Spring)
groups are allowed to select a second company to
two
B. Misch (did
copies, and
everyone presentations,
and exchangeaboutportions
contribute the
168-195.
the of
studentscompany
second
equally,the annual
are
with
did would
required
the reports,
someone groupbe for
!incorporated
recommendations. The potential
The university
into implications
a In in which
preparer-based
addition, of having
the
when project large
introductory
used as has
cash
a groupbeen
balances,
financial employed
assignment, in terms
accounting is of
the aproject
small,
acquiring
course, private,
alsobut other
theliberal
develops companies
project artseasily
students’
major
team
undergraduate
6.
Company
Bloom,
Introductory
multiple
seen
Baker,
reflect
make
using
comparison;
debt;
andan FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
sources
and
Once
Compare
without
an
Completing
B.S., instructor
important
H.K.
on
your the
the
Website
annual ed.
requests),
and
and
1956.
Discussion
appropriate
exceptional
company
thus,
the
your
report
A.
processes in
uses
programs
groups
no
Example:
and
L.
project: making
of
evaluations
Taxonomy
baseprior
Phillips.
funding,
assignedto
arecompany’s
formed
highlighting
that
contribution,
for
more an
develop
finding
to 2000.
their
comparison.
than Business
of
enrolling
to
indicate
and
investment
two did
discuss
educational
ateams anfinancial
common
Knowledge,
of
that
students’
the
annual
in the
non-financial
the
industry
financial
followed
someone
Annual
Administration
groups company
decision.
students
communication
statements
report
objectives:
relevant
analyze Skills,
reports
fail and
isaccounting.
to
the
decided,
for
for
(Hint:
and
to
Division
statement
view
Kroger:
The
with
comparison.
portions
the
Attributes
evaluate
contribute,
are
same you
also
theskills
classification
those
pair Based
of
might
the
available
etc?);
of
items
project
professors
the onandthat
ofperformance
the
Needed
want
3)
companies.
that
second
of
annual
any
on to
would
asstudents’
a success.
hand
educational
survey,
to
out
company
reports,
consider
conflicts
the Succeed
of the
SEC
be
copies
fewer
that
important
abilitiesgoals
without
items
ofthe
inthan
inarose
members
website,
to
the
university,
could
understanding or being
be adapted which
an of acquisition
has to
group approximately
other target.
dynamics settings, by750 or accounting,
to
requiring address students business,
additional totoreflect andon
issues. international
Because
the group the business
projectto
processes majors,
does
followed not
to
!Common
Collier, consider
Second, B. before
responses
andthe M.J.
papers investing
Wilson.
included
will be inreviewed
1994. in a the
company
What statement
Does
for in
content
athe industry,
Graduate
of cash
and flows
will
Need?: be compare
section
graded
Evidence the
include
using base
from company
discussion
the thefollowing
Careers of: another
rubric
and
understand,
assignment (Handbook
of_______ sheet,
analyze,
industry. grading
I: citations
cognitive and evaluate
Iftheyou rubric,
domain). were financial
teammaking
(New evaluation
disclosures
York: ain decision form,
Longman). (Demong
and suggestion
et al., 1979; sheet Americanfor obtainingAccounting annual
of Type
20%
with
http://sec.gov/, Financial
theiryour
Kroger.com
the
appropriate
discussed
teams.teamstudents
Management:
This
and
and
into
had
in evaluation
other
how
through ever
for
business
the
web
Evidencelooked
material
is
conflicts
the
browser
classes.)
undertaken
university
Pepperdineat
from
taken
were an address
USAannual
Entry-Level
from
resolved
library order
University
bar to to
report
sources
website
(if and
give
they
invest
0prior
outside
Mid-Level
students
using
were toin one
1 entering
the
either
resolved);
12 of the
the the
annual
Practitioners.
insight 67
into
S&P
4)
two thecompanies,
class,
reports,
how Market
28 and
Financial
groupand/or
effective only
Insight process
you 25%
with
or
all
require 1. of5: both
whom
Assisted The
knowledge are teammate
financial required
me inofand todid
nonfinancial
understanding
journal take much the
entries, more
the measures
introductory
it than
importance
could his/her
be in the
course of
incorporatedshare.
in financial into accounting.
user-based The
accountingcourse is most
courses
in
company
Demong, completing in of
R.F., the thesame
L.C. assignment.
Pettit, industry,
and B.J. and to make an investment recommendation. Thus, the project
!!reports
Association,
could The
Opinions
" 81-90
Click appropriateness
(Appendices
which
the
give points:
1986;
link
even CFOs.
companySEC
one The
Geary Financial
1,
Filings of
2,paper
and
would
detailed increasing
3, and
towardsyou isCampsey.
Practice
Rooney,
answer well
4).choose?
the
Carolyn fixed
Then,written,
when &
1993;bottom1979.
Education
assets
the
A. free
Collier
Why?
asked
Finance
in
professors
of
Galantine oforder
and
(Note:
the
about (Vol. Curriculum
grammatical
4,
Wilson,
your
screen to
show
financialNo.
expand;
answer 2)
1994;
students
items
for
59-65.
and the
other
inAlbrecht
this
that an Future:writing
annual
section
would and Perceptions
errors,
Sack,
be report
must 2000;
include
important and ato
from
as
believe
Lexis-Nexis Practice
excessivecomposition
well as
that to& Education,
reduce
databases.
your team was the (Vol.
errors
“free-rider” 10,
insomewhat will
No.
completing have 2)
problem
Malibu, 189-200.
tothe be resubmitted.
which
project
California often
and 5) Any
occurs papers
with requiringresubmissionfor
group
anything that you believe would have work. A copy of the
students’
and/or 4:
2. analysis
Required
coursesThe
first of teammate
orinme corporate
secondto analyze
accounting did performance
course or trends in business
finance more
in corporate
targeted than
and toward his/her
generally share.
0 is taken
non-business 2 during 6 students’
majors. 59If a written 41freshman project oris
develops
Note:
SEC
!company of
The For
Website students’
many
Practitioners
appropriateness
well Example:
organized. years, business
versus business
finding
Theof knowledge
Academicians.
divestitures
report a leaders
10-Kaddresses ofby
have
report requiring
Journal been
for
businesses
each Kroger:
of of the
emphasizing
Financial
the
in students the
Education
underperforming
issues to
specified need understandthe
for
(Vol.
in
areas; universities
the8) 45-48.
requirements, drivers
to of
enhance success
uses
Baker Click and
some inPhillips,
onDespiteonea different
financial
ofisthe 2000). industry,
issues,
links Manyto but
open
Businesscommercially-available
andyour spend
a aPDF answer approximately
document need not
or financial ten
befrom minutes
limited statement to90. discussing
analysis
a discussion an
projects
of itemfinancial on
are the
investors.
1. the
team
added 3:
above
evaluation
to
You your
must
The
reasons
team’s the
submit
teammate
included students’
will be
effectiveness.
the
did
in docked
entire initial
Appendix
approximately InAdministration
annual lack
minimum
addition, of may
3.report
As familiarity
his/her
ofbe
please
for 27.5Division
each
share.
seen with
points
include
company financial
out
thebeing
any of disclosures,
evaluation
suggestions discussed. that90%
form, youof
students have theare for
sophomore
not performance
desired,
Increased years.
the Approximately250
questions
myacquiring
understanding posed by students
ofFilingsthe project are enrolled
could be in the
used course
to each
stimulate year,class in sections
discussions of 25of
!in
!students’
Geary, aTheparticular
Click reasons
the
W. T.link industryand
technical,
and for
Search communication,
J. for
C.statement Rooney. to treasury
evaluate
Company 1993. afinancial
stock
andparticular
Designing and
critical
under statement
the company’s
appropriateness
thinking
Filings
Accounting performance
skills,
&“agreed”
Forms Education to of
(EDGAR) such
ensure with
to acquisitions;
regard
that
Achieve tofacts
graduates keyissues.
Balanced can
!!company’s
inteams,
required
The
books
Click appropriateness
appropriate
As exceeding
issues.)
the income
Table
intotheir Contact
detail
1 examples
100
indicates,
final US
themust work
of
link
reports, investing
pages, the
for to
that
performed
illustrate
and
large
contact might
demonstrated in securities
primarily
be
majority
Pepperdine concepts
important
USA
information of rather
require discussed,
students
University
moderate for than
students
investors
or in and
better core to integrates
to productive
obtain
or consider,
2 understanding
“strongly the assets;
descriptive annual
discussing
agreed”
of31 key report
one
that about
ofdata
the
financial the
2.
improving 3.
2: Your the
The analysisproject
teammate in didfuture
include somewhat pageby
classes. each
references
Finally,
less than
member
evaluate
to relevant
his/her
of0each
share.
the team
portions
member and10ofof to
the rate
65
your annual the
team, contribution
reports,
including and of
to
financial
Note:
McWilliams, 30 students.
topics.
disclosures
The
With “default”
regard
V.B. The
If and project
individual
rating
to C.C.
student should is
Pantalene. currently
assignments
perceptions
be a “3.”
1994. employed
are
Giving
of preferred,
Structuring
the every to
project, strengthen
the
memberthe project
over Financeof
90% the
the is of investor-orientation
sufficiently
Curriculum:
team the astudents
“5” compact
willA Survey.
be
commented
viewed as(user)
tothe
!The
effectively
!project The
Click appropriateness
project
Improved
the
Intellectual
The risks
with develops
handle
link
and
the my
for
Development. ability
unstructured
Full
appropriateness
narrative. of to
students’
Text paying
Search
The Issuestechnical
evaluate report
of or
problems,
on
in increasing
the knowledge
corporate
Accounting
ABSTRACT
obtaining focuses to
left-handfinancing
on dividends,
by
financial
improve side
Education requiring
important students’
of
through and
the
(Vol. thatthe
screen
items,8,
debt abilities
No. trade-off
students
or 1) to
60-70.
demonstrates
equity; makebetween
accurately and
a paying
report
defend
thorough
companies
company’s
disclosures, increased
This and
investing
paper
the industries
their
describes
relationshipsor understanding
financing
(many a of
financial
among activities,
which
Malibu, of will
statement
accounts, both and
not financial
California
andapply
discussing
analysis
the to accounting
a particular
a
project
drivers non-financial
useful
of success companybeinganalyzed)
(#14) in and
both item
forshould the that
preparer-
the must importance
industries would be
and
being of
!each
yourself, Themember
negative
the relevant
using on aspects
the scaleof
a following
portions ofdecreasing
0ofscale:
to the 5. annual
Students dividends.
reportsare told must that be the “default”
highlighted. rating
Your report be aalso 3 (thatcontain the
dimension 1: individual The
of teammate
courses did much less than his/her share.
make
Classroom
favorably
!identically
changes
!recommendations,
Kimmel, 4. Click
Financialon
dividends
Click theP. onto
that
decisions Search
Practice
link
1995. giving
the
andhavecompletion
Implementation
for Aproject&that
every
reinvesting
andtaken
Advanced
Framework to
are
Education
inmember
place
improve theprimarily
feasible.
Approaches
in
Search team
the
for (Vol.
in of If the
4,
company;
a
students’
on
preparer-based,
an international
evaluation
No.team
particular
Incorporating the 1)and 37-46.
aCritical
understanding
right-hand “3.”
forms
company’s
but
dimension
Teammates
in
side0when
the
the
of
Thinking
project
most
offinancial
the the
is
whose
broader
4accounting.
screen
Into 12
does
desired,
recent
accounts,
not
ratings
business
Accounting
therequire
semester,
58
project
average
understand
environment
knowledge
andcould
34performance
Education. 1 point
in the be
the
and
to
important
understanding
Common
reviewed. The
" Improved
appropriateness
understanding
calculate
based
67.5-71.5
Currently,
Infor
ratios.
responses and
a
addition, my
both
company
Such
points:
this ability
of
user-based
included
duringof
financial the
project
The early
projectsto
in relationships
paper discuss
the
the and
inis retirements
introductory
are
industry.
the
oral
being
does non-financial
nonfinancial
open
non-financial
presentations
not to
used among
haveof
During
the debt;
courses
by financial
measures
common this
excessive
two
items
at in
the professors
section
end statement
introduction,
financial
criticisms
grammatical
of evaluating
the
include
infaced
the
term, adata, and
professors
by corporate
accounting
preparer-based
or
discussion
students
other Theis cohesive.
project
emphasize
writingerrors.
addressed
of: andfinancialfinance
the the
The vast
teammate contributed
appropriate quotation his or her marks share),for and that
quoted all other
material and scores
appropriate requirecitations justification. for Students
material takenare
of
modified
3. 0:
journal Your The
entries
toof teammate
analysis
require and easily
comparison
is limited did not
couldto 6of contribute
be
(six) incorporated
companiespages, to and the
from mustproject
intodifferent
begiven at
user-based
typed, all.
countries. principles of accounting courses
S&P
university-mandated
above
underlying
the
!(#1).
Market
that
drivers
Journal
Go to the of
of
Insight
causes
In the
corporate
Accounting
Form team ofExample:
anonymous
the
Type will
success.have
changes,
Education
pull-down
finding their
Projectsandascores
teacher
(Vol.
menu
10-K understand
such
13,
report
evaluations
raised
No.
and as 3)the
click
for
by the Kroger:
5%.
one
299-318.
on Teammates
relationships
10-K described atdouble-spaced,
the in whose
end paper
among
this ofratingsand have
class
financial
help are
each lessat term,
statement
students
least
thanto
programs
variety
accounting
!also "
The A statement
72-80.5
requires
of
similar
of
comments
importance
report focusing
course issues
points:
majority
students
addresses The
that
too
environment.
ofoutside that
customer
thepaper
“agreed”
tomuch
one would
analyze
issues might
attention
or be
generally trends important
“strongly
make.
APPENDIX is
on inwell
For
rule
corporate
agreed”to
written
example,
application
1 but
that may
performance,
a the
professor
and have
project minor
highly-structured
to
might
required
evaluate grammatical
comment them
corporate
problem to
that or other
analyze
solving,
a a10%
majority advised
from of the that
sourcesitems giving presented everyone theservice Both
above specified
a “5”
financial professors
inand the customer
in the
“examples
isstatements.
viewed introduce
requirements,
satisfaction;
identically the to
of appropriate project but during
giving demonstrates
responses”
everyone the sixth only
week
discussion.
a “3” and moderate
ofthat
Also,16-
!as
approximately
1 5.
6. "
well.
Type 63-66.5
Improved
a
Click above
point 10-point
the ticker points.
linkproject my font.
symbol
for Company
one-third
the teamThe
ability
FINANCIAL paper
in to
ofaveragethe
the compare does
ACCOUNTING
box
atstudents’
the
class and and
top nottwo
typically of
at have
clickthe
least Goexcessive
companies TEAM
screen
identifies
2.41a will PROJECTgrammatical
1
0
thereceiveproject 4
3 the
as beingor20 other
grade“the 63
51 writing
on the best
the 20
34 errors.
paper
aspect The
that
of the is
accounts.
!develop The
these desired develops
abilities, and give critical
students reasoning richer skills by
understanding requiring that
of studentsimportance identify
and
increase
trends
4.
!because
week
Typefailing
Click
The in
Thethe
potential
writing
financial
thein
semester
relative
company
to errors
corporate
sales
assignment
link
understanding,
students investors
develop
decisions,to
could
for
standing
(shortly EDGAR
understand
name
or
performance islack
represent
what
and/or
of due
after on
the
in the
smooth
discuss
Bloom’s
on
the
the
lacks (#2),
an
company
from the appropriate
first transitions.
improvement
non-financialstatementissues
increased
date
left-hand Taxonomy
integration.
the specified
examination),
in
beginning side
customer
box
theirThe
ofin(1956)
that in
the report
understanding
some
so the refers
screen
satisfaction
team that cases addresses
syllabus. (such
students
members to that
of
rankings the
asfinancial
asthe
would
are
will when
be issues
higher-order
and be
familiarstatement
sales
in
required specified
important
for
market
with to the disclosures
skills
the
give industry
share; of of
indetailed
the
basic
individual project grades will be adjusted upward for teammates who make exceptional contributions
REQUIRED: report WRITTEN
addresses PROJECTthe issues specified inwhose
the requirements, butbetween demonstrates only minimal
class.”
determined
issues
accounting 7. within Improved
In
whichaddition,
byan industry
the
would
information myat ability
grading
the
be and end to make
rubric.
particularly
the ofusefulness
the investment
Teammates
mostimportant recent
of decisions
accountingtoterm, scores
an
investors 0anonymous
disclosuresaverage
in 4the in 11
survey
industry,
the 64was
1.5assess
decision-making and 29
administered
2.4 will
company have
process. to
!only
1.
analysis,
(#3),
!descriptions
financial The
"
Click
The 54-62.5
impact
Obtain
requirements,
increase
increased
to synthesis,
Because
the potential
importance icon
accounting the
of
points.
5%, thechanges
ofmost
theiror and demonstrates
The
investors,
when
project
the
ofteam recent
abilities in
paper
evaluation
document
process
marketing general
related
asks annual
to
to
at the is
compareacceptable
understanding,
evaluate economic
report
(Accounting
costs
open-ended
to
campaigns change only two for
corporateafter
conditions;
two
increase
companies
Education
questions,
the format and
initially
companies focuses
financial
3%), it
(Word, requiring
Change
within
isa inmainly
the
deterioration
decisions
considered an
HTML, resubmission
_______
Commission, on
industry, important
(#4) in
preferable
etc) industry.
other
and 1990;todue items,
The
increased
cases
to make to
Geary
use reports
failure
but
(such
a and does
their
holistic as
or downward of for eachteammates member’s
who failtimecontribution
to contribute thetoproject maintaining
and is introduced.
to
appropriately. rateand theincreasing As a first
contributions
Teammates market step, share;
numerically
whose Much the professors
ratings (and
average that
!Grading
REQUIRED: The quality
should
Techniques
EXAMPLES
TEAM
understanding and
contain stabilityat APPROPRIATE
PRESENTATION
OFof least
one of or senior
threemore years
management;
of of income
RESPONSES
the issues. andstatement
BY REQUIREMENT data and two years ofthan balance sheet
directly
their more
!performance
Rooney,
when
grading
abilities 8.Theproject
sales
seek student
Improved
company’s
to
not comply
investment
to
Each fully
rubric
1993;
Improved make
for
grade
inthe regard
my
synthesize
McWilliams
rather
professor
lowered
investment
my
perceptions
technical
emphasis
with
recommendations.
past than
uses
to
the
several
analytical the
aand
to
by
those
on
decisions
10%.
skills
basic social
material
specify
years
different
skills
of
areas,
Pantalene,
the
Teammates
haveThe
(#7).
project.
and
responsibility
requirements,
being
particular
approach project’s
increased
While
1994: make
in
The
discussed,
whose results
and
and
excessive
manystudents
responses
Albrecht
requirements
15%),
selecting
scores
defend
2or
ethical
and/or
of the
and
that
average
15
stability
the Sack,
survey
investment
business
composition
does
“agreed”
are
must
industry not 44
completely
in
2000).
be
between
are summarized
practices.
integrate
others
that
and errors,
included
Thethe
(such
0.5 and
recommendations.
41 the
detailed
companies or
project
project
in 6annual
asboth
24 failure
the
when
on
1.49
below
improved
in
for paper
this
will
to or
report
sales
analysis.
inIn
!the
organize
1 Click
Theratings
point above the
importance link
students
have for
a the
into
of
potential
that of presentation 10-K
proper
groups
the team havefor report
geographic
impact of No four under
on
their to
grades), Annual
five
selection
scores people,
free Filings
and balancing
riding
raised by 5%.the political Fair
appears stability;
the
Teammates togroupsbe less
whose basedof his/her
an on issue
ratingsproject. than academic
are lessEach might
than
Prepare
Lexis a 15Team
While
data.
Example: minute
responses
finding do Contribution
a 10-K varyreport with the
for the class
Kroger: summarizing
industry, common results ofincluded
analyses your team’s in the income
Table Individual
10. Improved myMember critical thinking skills Share 6
!have
addition,
Common
!!their
paper,
One
have
presentationThe
Click
their
1.level
Analyze
professor
technical
been
aon
project
the
responses
Business
demonstrate
datasingle
the and
with project
increasing
in at
other
takesat
the
skills
page,
order
grade
percentage
least in
the
(#8),
hand, 3the
industry
and
to10%
lowered
develops
top(three)
understanding
narrative.obtain
the
41% comparison
isofchanges
for muchthe
project
suggestions
of the
a
by 20%.
students’
items ofisof
screen
students
particular
more
past on
twoand
totalTeammates
communication
the
applicableor
several
in
from
ratedrecommendation
grade.revenues,
income
more
keeping the
the
years
to of
Indeed,
class
whose
statement
the
project the
companies
withfor (with
the
1both
scores
skills
components
aissues
major
asthesectionby
for
recommendations
“neutral”
in
the
average
requiring
your
required
restriction
any
advantage include
company of
base
industry.
20in to
this
below
that
of
students
revenues,
be company
discussion
and
58 area.
The
theof
there
0.5cost
discussed.
the
project
case
authors
This
will
toof:
that of
industry).
be
receive
prepare
isresult would
sales,
sufficient
thatsuch there
isAas
major
otherwise
1 9.point
Click
The andthe
impact
above be link
performance
of for
expected
the Archives
government
team in
in athe
average to
group classaccess
regulations;
and to
project.
at older
date least 10-K
2.41 reports
(includingperformance
receive (back
the grade to 5 1994)
onon homework
the paper Share
and
that the
22
was first exam),
determined
member
2. 11.
!statement Go to Improved
ofsection
the the
Left-hand my
team written
include MUST
sidediscussion
of the0screen
communication
participate of:inand the 1click
skills the2link for
presentation, and 310after
SEC Filings the4 presentation 5 you will be
a
!concise zero on the
written project.
reports and to amake
The
major0be
relative
" “optimal” expenses,
important
points. sizes
The of
operating
to
paper the
an two
investor,
fails to income,
companies
meet andoral thenet presentations
discuss
being
income,
basic whether
analyzedor
requirements, detailing
earnings
yourand and
company’s
the
has per impact defending
share
excessive performance
of
over size their
the
composition analyses
differences
periodrelated being
errors, on and
to
Kimmel
companies
professor
is
somewhat
as no
well requires
as (1995),
might
to so
surprising
that
answer
achieve only
who
comment
no call
limited
more
given
to
diversity.for
the
that
than
using
introduction
the
questions
The two
company
strong
cases
groupgroups being
which
ratings
in
with
format will
theasked—appropriate
large
do
have
classroom,
regarding
isandnot
usedinvestments
tohave analyze
to is
unique
theeasily
encourage theproject’s
inresponses
property
same
solutions
adaptable
studentspair
influence
and
will
of
and to
companies),
tovary
equipment
which
reflect
learn onbased students’
require
from on
but
writes
eachthe
few
!by
The
!expected
the
The
Typeoral grading
trend
two presentations
to
either companies’
in rubric.
the
entertain
the ticker
In
relationshiptrends
are addition,
questions worth
symbol in between
for
or
all
revenues,
10 the5-10 students
points, revenues
company costs,
with
minutes whose
operating
5namepoints
from ratings
cost 2
allocated
both
into of
income,
the
fall
sales,
the within
revenues
classnet
to
appropriate the22 the
income,
and “fair
importance
theand
box56 share”
earnings
operating
professor. 16 and or
per above
relevance
income,
share,
Key words:Financial
12. Improved statement 0 analysis, 1financial2decision 3making,introductoryaccounting 4 5 26
conclusions. Analyze
analyzed;
company
these items atmy
Finally,
stability least oral3 communication
when
appeared
and (three) used
flexibility;
to be items
as a
improving, on skills
group the deteriorating,
balance
assignment, sheetor for
the
12
your
project
remaining basestable.
also company develops
Justify thatyour would
students’
answer. be
project,
students
the
dividends
companies
understanding
other, to accounting
and/or
suggestions
instructor
to might
and
motivate fails
formulateof
industries
on
be case
to
preferences,
financial
the
seeking
students demonstrate
recommendations
board,beinganalyzed.
accounting
to
to and
and
expand,
consider may understanding
asksbe and
students
or on used
Appendix
that
financial
theabasis
alternative as
company
toeither
voteof
statement
2of two
includes
incomplete
viewpoints,for
an or
involved
their more
individual
adisclosures,
copy
totop of
information.
intwo
develop of the issues
aorhighly-competitive
the
choices.
a group
and
gradingrubric
students’may
The required
assignment.
Then, reflect
projecta second currently
understanding to vote
aindustry
lack be
included
of
!range
!of The
the
or
and
Click causes
are
revenues
matters given
dividends;
on Search of changes
the
discussed;
and “benefit
net in
income
3 the
of
points components
the
over doubt”
allocatedthe if
period to of
theirtheincome
beingfinal statement
grade
professionalism
analyzed; in the
2 accounts;
of class
the is on
presentation; the border and between
2 points
! Go to the Sources pull-down menu and click on SEC Form 2 10-K 44 36 6
3.
understanding
(In important
13.LexisNexis,
Increased aof to
my group
single an investor,
understanding
10-Kdynamics is often and0 by of discuss
split team
requiringinto 1several
whether
interactions
students 2 tocompany’s
your
records, reflect3 6beoncareful)
so the 4 group processes
performance 5related
38 to these
followed
here
is
might
being
!of The
group discussed
clarityinherent
taken has
employed.
be
This
twofromgreatly
onlypaper
dynamics, among
six
companies’in after
affected
As
the
includes
and a
requirements,
isthe
general
notedfirst
top
by the
strategies
to limit resubmission.
the
in
two
termcomplete
the
popularity
the which
original
in“technical
Appendix,
amount
terms are
project
suggestions,
of
of completely
ofskills.”
its
the
levelsrequirement
timeadvertising
rubric
A
and substantial
with
required detailed
allocates
areas a campaigns.
majority
sheet,
ofof themajority
on
90 a
expansion;points
a grading
projectvote
single
Next,
of determining
to
forthe
page.
rubric,
the students
both professors
written
Yet,
a team
students the
while
“agreed”
paperindustry
review
andtheand the
!two effect
grades.
allocated ofability
toTeammates “one-time” whose gains scores or lossesaverage on net income
between 1.5 and and 2.4onhave theof calculation
their project of
grade trends lowered into
! The
Select relative
the the
date team’s
you of want the
responsiveness
two
(the companies
default istoallquestions.
to
dates) meet theirEvery
4
obligations
member as
53 Justify
the
evidenced team is
33 your answer.
byrequired
working
in
14. items appeared
completing
Increased the my assignment. to be improving,
understanding 0of ofimproved deteriorating,
financial 1for accounting 2or to remaining 3professor stable. 4are 5statement
requirements
to
the
10
or “strongly
points
be
facultygrading
analyzed.
evaluation
who to agreed”
process,
theprovideoral
Finally,
form, that
presentation.
emphasizing
a examples
systematic
groups
the project have the
The
framework
items
need
one
grade week
that
for their
for
students
students
the
tocompletion,
ability
send
written might
the
to focus
discuss
paper they
be on is
expected
also
non-financial
items
determined
an that
open-ended,
email
to would
address
primarily
proposingbeinimportant
inducing
byitems
two
four
by earnings;
10%.
participate
capital, inmust
Teammates
acid and
the testgrade whose
presentation.
ratios, it. current
scores average ratios, and 83debt-to-asset
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
between 0.5 and ratios; 1.49 have their project grade lowered
students
companies
to
factors:
important
investors.
answering
thetototoFinally,
create
level
investors
analyze, theof analyses
the questions
understanding
with
(#5),
professors
first
improved
tailored
responders
posed, discuss to
demonstrated;
their
comments
thethe being
ability
particular 1results 23the 52
by 20%. Finally, teammates whose0scores average 1various given
below
to
onmethods
compare
2the
thecircumstances
preference,
relevance
0.5 receive 3of
companies
obtaining
ofsoemploying
a zero
ofthat
encountered
4 on no
within
annual
items
more the
the project.
an5reports.
than
project,
discussed;
byindustry
the
two Inspecific
Last year,
groups
total,
(#6),the

companies
analyze
the
cohesiveness
increased
entire
and
thetheir
introductory
additional
and
same
of
analytical
specific
the
pair.arguments
suggestions
process
industries
and critical
generally
presented;
being
for
thinking
implementation.
analyzed
takes
skills
and
approximately
at
(#9
the
aand
particular
quality
0#10),twenty
of
and
point
the
increased
minutes
in
writing.
8 time.60
their
ofThe
class
understanding
grade
time.for the