Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Home Blog By.... CONSTITUTION CONTRACT ... Hindu Law Indian Penal Code JURISPRUDENCE
Muslim Law.. Registration Act.. Law of Torts.. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Civil Procedure Cide (CPC)
BLOG ARCHIVE
Indian Penal Code
▼ 2013 (1)
▼ September (1)
INDIAN PENEL CODE Video Lecture Hindi...
LL.B Notes
Part 1---
Part-2
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 1/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 3/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 4/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Case: Kedar Parsad V/s State 1992: It was held by the court that the
first accused was liable U/s 304 and the other U/s 324 for causing hurt
by dangerous weapon & the third U/s 323 for causing simple hurt only.
Case:- Ghanssham V/s State of Maharashtra 1996 : The accused
husband stabbed his wife on chest resulting in her death on her refusal
to have sexual intercourse with him. It was held that the act was done in
sheer frustration and anger and so his liability was based on sec. 299(2)
of IPC.
Case: Sarabjeet Singh V/s St ate 1994. The accused did not have good
relation with complainant on account of sale transaction of piece of land.
He went to the house and assaulted the complainant and his wife. He
also picked up the infant child of the complainant and threw him down
on the ground with force as a result of which the child died some time
later. The accused was held guilty under sec. 304 Part-II. When
culpable homicide amounts to murder : According to sec.300 of IPC
except the exceptions culpable homicide is murder, it the act by which
death is caused:
1. It is done with the intention of causing death or
2. It is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the
offender knows that it is to be likely to cause the death of the person to
whom the harm is caused.
3. If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person
and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient ordinary cause
of nature to cause death
4. If the person committed the act knows that it is so imminently
dangerous that it must in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury
as is like to cause death; and commits such act without any excuse for
incurring death or such injury as said above.
ILLUSTRATION:
A. A shoots Z with intention of killing him, Z dies in consequence, A
commits murder.
B. A knowing that Z is labouring under such disease that a blow is
likely to cause his death, strike him with the intention of causing bodily
injury, Z dies in consequences of blow. A is guilty of murder.
C. A intention gives Z a sword cut sufficient to cause the death of a
man in the ordinary course of nature. Z dies in consequences. Here A is
guilty of murder although he may not have intended to cause Z’s death.
D. ‘ A’ without any excuse fires a loaded cannon in to a crowd of
persons and kills one of them. A is guilty of murder although he may not
have had a pre-meditated design to kill any particular individual.
Cases:-
Sridharan Sathesan V/s State of Keral 1995:-
There was a dispute between the accused and the deceased regarding
the payment of money. The accused who was a driver caused serious
injuries by his mini bus and hit the deceased with great speed in he
middle portion of the body. Tyre marks were also found on the thighs of
the deceased. It was held that it was an intentional killing and Sec.300
(1) was applicable.
Case : State V/s Sadanand 1987 :-
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 6/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 7/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
C. The person doing the act must have exceeded in his right given to
him by law and thereby caused death.
D. The act must be done without premeditation and without any
intention of causing more harm then was necessary for the purpose of
such defence.
ILLUSTRATION:- Z attempts to horsewhip A, not in such a manner as to
cause grievous hurt to A. A draws out a pistol. A believing in good faith
that he can by no other mean, prevent himself from being horsewhipped
shoots Z and kills. A has not committed murder but culpable homicide.
Bahadur Singh v/s State 1993 :The complainant party assaulted the
accused person who were also armed with sharp weapons like Gandasa
by the use of which death caused. It was held they had excluded their
right of private defence in good faith and so exception N’s was available
to them.
3. OFFENCE BY PUBLIC SERVANT OR PERSON AIDING PUBLIC
SERVANT.
Culpable homicide is not murder if the following conditions are there :-
a. Offence must be committed by public servant or by some other
person acting in the aid of a public servant in advancement of public
justice,
b. Public servant or such person must have exceeded the power
given to him by law.
c. Death must be caused by doing an act which he, in good faith,
believes to be lawful & necessary for discharge of his duty.
d. The act must have been done without any malafide intention
towards the person whose death is caused.
Case : Dakhi Singh V/s State 1955.: It was held by the Court that he
was entitled to have the benefit of this exception and so he was liable
only for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
4. Death caused by sudden fight. For the application of this
exception
The following conditions must be ful-filled :-
a. Death must be caused by sudden fight.
b. Fight must be without any pre-meditation.
c. It must be occur in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel.
d. It must be committed without the offender’s having taken undue
advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.
Explanation :- It is immaterial in such cases where party offers the
provocation or commits the first assault.
Case :- State v/s Jodha Singh 1989: A quarrel between accused and the
deceased parties changed in to a sudden fight in which weapon were
used by both parties resulting in injuries on both sides and death of the
deceased. This exception was held to be applicable.
5. Death caused with the consent: Culpable homicide is not murder
when the person whose death is caused being above the age of
eighteen years suffers death or takes the risk of death with his own
consent.
Illustration :- ‘A’ by instigation, voluntarily caused Z, ( a person under l8
years of age) to commit suicide. Here on account of Z’s death (he was
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 8/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Q. No. 4: What do mean by kidnapping? Distinguish between
Kidnapping & Abduction.
Answer :-INTRODUCTION: Kidnapping and abduction are particular
types of offences under the law of crime. Under these offences, a
person is taken away secretly or forcible without his consent or without
the consent of authorised guardian. Under kidnapping a person is
kidnapped from lawful custody. Under section 359 of IPC, there are two
types of kidnapping :-
1. Kidnapping from India.
2. Kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
Section 360 : defines that kidnapping from India and section 361 defines
that kidnapping from lawful guardian ship. The offence of abduction is
defined under section 362 of IPC.
1. KIDNAPPING FROM INDIA:
Section 360 says that whoever conveys any person beyond the limit of
India without the consent of that person or of any person legally
authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that
person from India. Age limit is immaterial. This has two essentials :
(i) Convey any person beyond the limits of India.
(ii) Such conveying must be without the consent of that person or of
the person legally authorised to give consent on behalf of that person.
2. KIDNAPPING FROM LAWFUL GUARDIANSHIP : SEC.361
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 9/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Sec. 361 says that whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen
years of age if a male or under eighteen years of age if a female, or any
person of unsound mind, out of the keeping of the lawful guardianship of
such minor or person of unsound mind, without the consent of such
guardian is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful
guardianship. The word lawful guardian here mans any person lawfully
interested with care or custody of such minor or other person.
3. EXCEPTIONS :- There is one exception of this section, this
section does not extend to the act of any person who in good faith
believes himself to be the father of an illegitimate child, or who in good
faith, believes himself to be entitled the lawful custody of such child
unless such act is committed for an immoral or unlawful purpose.
Take or entice away :- Take away or entice away means to induce a
person for going to another place. The object of this Sec. Is to protect
minor children from being reduced ( to corrupt) for improper purpose.
Guadian consent :- The kidnapping must be without the consent of the
guardian. The consent may be expressed or implied. Thus, to attract
this sec. there must be taking or enticing away any minor or unsound
mind person out of lawful guardianship.
ABDUCTION
Section 362 says that whoever by force compels or by any deceitful
induces any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person.
This section may read with section 364, 365 and 360.
This section contains two essentials for the offence of abduction :-
1. Forcible compulsion or inducement by deceitful means.
2. The object of such compulsion or inducement must be going of a
person from any place. Thus abduction is an offence under sec.362. If
by force a person compels or even by fraudulent means induce any
other person to go from any place taken is called abduction.
PUNISHMENT FOR KIDNAPPING UNDER SEC. 363 :
Whoever kidnaps any person from India or from Lawful guardianship
shall be punished with imprisonment or either description for a term
which may extend to seven years and shall be liable to fine.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KIDNAPPING AND ABDUCTION:
KIDNAPPING ABDUCTION
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 10/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
UNIT IV
Question No. 11:- What is defamation? What defences are available to a
person who is charged with the offence of defamation.? OR
Can a wrongful act of a defamation constitute an offence? What are the
defences available to the alleged wrong-doer? Describe.
Answer : INTRODUCTION:-
Defamation is a crime against the reputation of a person. Defamation is
also a tort. It is one of the most important rights of a person or right of
his reputation. If any person by way of libel i.e. written words or by
salener i.e. spoken words lowers the reputation of a person then it is
called defamation. The reputation must be lowered among the
reasonable person including relation of a person.
DEFINITION OF DEFAMATION :-
Section 499 of IPC says that whoever by words, spoken or written or by
sign or by visible representation, makes or publishes any imputation
concurring any person invading to harm or knowing or having reason to
believe that such imputation will harm the reputation of such person is
said, except in the case of hereinafter accepted, to defamed that person.
This section 499 of IPC contains the following things :-
1. Whoever makes publishes any imputation concurring any person.
2. Such imputation must be made by words, signs or by visible
representation.
3. Such imputation must be made or published with the intention of
harming or with the knowledge or having reason to believe that it will
harm the reputation of such person.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 11/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 12/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Q. No 9:- What do you mean by Kidnapping? Distinguish between
Kidnapping and Abduction.
OR
What are the ingredients of the offence of kidnapping ?
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 13/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 14/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Unit No. 1
Q. No. 12: Explain in detail the concept of Abetment.
Answer :- INTRODUCTION :- A crime may be committed by one or
more persons involved in crime then their liability depends upon the
extent of their participation. Thus this rule of joint liability comes into
existence. But there is an important fact which is that the law has a
knowledge about the abettor, who has given help to another in crime.
This rule is very ancient and was applied in Hindu Law also. In English
Law, criminals are divided in four categories, but in India there is only
one distinction between the doer and his helper who is known as
abettor. The crime of abetment come under section 107 to 120 of the
IPC. Section 107 defines ‘abetment of a things’ and section l08 defines
about the abettor.
SECTION 107 IPC ‘ABETMENT OF THING’:
A person abets the doing of a thing by instigation :-
1. Instigate any person to do that things
2. By conspiracy.
3. By aids.
BY INSTIGATION ANY PERSON TO DO THAT THINGS :- According to
the first clause of section 107 a person abets of thing that instigates any
person to do that thing. A person is said to instigate another when he
incites, urges, encourages, provokes, counsels, procures or command
him to do something.
EXPLANATION :- A person who by wilful misrepresentations or by wilful
concealment of a material fact, which he is bound to disclose, voluntary
causes or procures or attempts to cause or procures a thing to be done,
is said to instigate the doing of that things.
ILLUSTRATION :-
A Police Officer is authorised by a warrant from a court of justice to
apprehend Z. B knowing that fact and also that C is not Z, wilfully
represents to A that C is Z and thereby intentionally causes A to
apprehend C. Here B abets by instigation the apprehension of C.
Case : Gurbachan Singh v/s Sat Pal Singh, AIR- 1990
A newly wedded girl died of burns. The father of deceased had stated in
FIR that the deceased committed suicide because of harassment and
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 15/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
constant taunt for insufficient dowry. It was held by the SC that the
deceased had committed suicide at the instigation of her husband and in
laws and it was not a case of accidental death.
2. ABETMENT BY CONSPIRACY
The second clause of this section states that a person abets the doing of
a thing who engages with one or more other persons in conspiracy for
the doing of that thing. If an act or illegal omission takes place in
pursuance of that conspiracy and in order to doing of that thing then it is
called abetment by conspiracy. If an act or illegal omission takes place in
prurience of that conspiracy.
ILLUSTRATION :-
A concerts with B a plans for poisoning Z. It is agreed that A shall
administer the poison. B then explains the plan to C mentioning that a
third person is to administer the poison, but without mentioning A’s
name. C agrees to procure the poison and deliver it to B for the purpose
explained ‘A’ administers the poison and Z dies. Here A and C have not
conspired together, yet C has therefore committed the offence and is
liable for punishment.
A case : Rup Devi v/s State : 1955.
The deceased & his wife had strained relationship. The wife had illicit
intimacy with the accused. The deceased was scheduled to go to
‘Sadhu” on a particular day. The wife told the accused about this
programme even though she knew that the accused was waiting for the
opportunity to kill her husband and taking the opportunity he killed him.
It was held that the wife was not guilty of abetment by conspiracy, even
though her conduct was open to censure.
3. ABETMENT BY AIDING:
The third clause of the section says that,” A person abets the doing of
thing who intentionally aids by any act in the illegal omission of the doing
of that thing.
EXPLANATION :- Whoever either prior to or at the time of the
commission of an act does anything in order to facilitate the commission
of that act thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the
doing of that act.
ILLUSTRATION :- If the servant keeps the gate open of the master’s
house so that thrives may enter and thieves do not come, he cannot be
held to have abetted the commission of theft.
A case: Ram Kumar v/s State of H.P. 1995. The 19 years old prosecutrix
was taken to the police station by the accused that kept watch over her
husband while she was raped by the co-accused. In this custodial rape
the accused turned deaf ears towards the cries of the prosecutrix and
did nothing to help her. The SC implied abetment of the accused for
abetment of rape.
SECTION 108 OF IPC: ABETTOR :
A person can become an abettor in two ways :-
1. When he abates the commission of an offence : Example : Where
he abets ‘B’ to commit murder of ‘Z’. Here A is an abettor.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 16/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Unit No. iv
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 17/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 18/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Chapter-IV
Question :-14: What is an attempt to commit offences. Discuss in the
light of section 511 of IPC. OR
How far are attempts to commit offences punishable under section 511
of IPC? What must be proved in order to support the conviction of an
attempt under this section.? OR
What are the different stages of the commission of an offence and how
far each of them is punishable? (b) Distinguish between ”preparation to
commit an offence” and “attempt to commit an offence.”
Answer: INTRODUCTION:-
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 19/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 20/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Criminal trespass is dependent not upon the mere nature of the act, but
upon the intention of the offender. As to what intentions constitute
criminal trespass enumerated in the section itself, and beyond these no
other intention will constitute criminal trespass. In other words, not all
intents of the offender will constitute criminal trespass but only those
mentioned in the section.
DEFINITION OF CRIMINAL TRESPASS
Criminal trespass as define in Section 441 of IPC as follows :-
“ Whoever trespass into or upon property in the possession of another
with intent to commit an offence or to insult or annoy any person in
possession of such property or having lawfully entered into or upon such
property, unlawfully remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult
or annoy any such person or with the intent to commit an offence is said
to commit ‘criminal trespass.”
INGREDIENTS OF CRIMINAL TRESPASS
The following are the ingredients of criminal trespass :-
i) Entry into or upon the property of another.
ii) If such entry is lawful, then unlawfully remaining upon such
property.
iii) Such entry as above in Sr.No.(ii) above remaining unlawfully there
must be with the following intentions :-
a) To commit an offence.
b) To insult, annoy or to intimidate any person in possession of the
property.
It should be noted that the use of criminal force is not at all a necessary
ingredient to constitute criminal trespass. The entry upon the property of
another relates to immovable corporeal property and not incorporeal
property such as a right of ferry or fishery. The property must be in the
actual possession of another person. The offence of criminal trespass
can only be committed against the person who is in actual physical
possession of the property. It is not necessary that the owner of the
property be present there. The criminal trespass can be done even in
the absence of owner of property.
In order to establish that the entry on the property was with
the intention to annoy or insult, it is necessary for the court to be
satisfied that causing such annoyance or insult was the aim of entry.
That in deciding the case whether the aim of entry was the causing of
such annoyance or insult, the court has to consider all the relevant
circumstances and to include the probability of something also being the
dominant intention which prompted the entry. as in the case of Mathuri
v/s State of Panjab 1964-65.
In another case of Rash Bihari Chartterjee v/s Fegu Shaw 1979 S.C:- It
was held that the law does not require that the intention must be to
annoy person who is actually present at the time of the trespass.
In order to submit the reasons in support of the problem
given in the question it is submitted as under :-
That in the given case ‘A’ is not guilty of any offence for it could not be
said that he intended to cause annoyance to B within the meaning of
section 441 IPC, referred to case of Abdul Majid 1938 Lahore. This is
inferred from the circumstances that A had taken all precautions not to
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 21/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
let his presence in the house known to any one and also that he was not
forbidden to enter the house. The purpose of carrying on an intrigue
with an unmarried grown up daughter is not illegal nor is it an offence.
However if B had expressly forbidden A from entering his
house, then the position would have become different. A’s entry would
then have been in direct defiance of an express order and an intention
to annoy B could be inferred from it.
HOW THE OWNER HIMSELF BE GUILTY OF CRIMINAL TRESPASS
OF OWN PROPERTY:-
Unit-IV
Question No. 16:-What is the law relating to cruelty by husband or
relatives of the husband of the woman? How is it punishable.?
OR
Are you satisfied with the definition of Section 498-A enshrined in the
IPC? Discuss the relevance and constitutionality of Section 498-A also.
Answer : INTRODUCTION :- Chapter XXA comprising Section 498-A
which punishes cruelty by the husband or relatives of the husband to the
woman has been inserted by the Criminal Law(Second Amendment)Act
1983, in Act No. 46 of 1983 it received the assent of the President on
25th.December,1983 and the same was published in the Gazette of
India Extraordinary, dated 26.12.1983.
The new provision seeks to curb atrocities on women including
those arising out of dowry demands. The extremer reticence of Indian
women to expose the bestiality and cruelty perpetrated on them led the
crusading members to raise the matter in the Parliament which led to
the passing of the Criminal Law (First and Second ) Amendments, 1983
Section 498-A. Therefore envisages that if a husband or the relatives of
the husband of a woman subjects such woman to cruelty, he shall be
liable to punishment for three years and fine.
HUSBAND OR RELATIVE OF HUSBAND OF A WOMAN SUBJECTING
HER TO CRUELTY :-
Whoever being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman
subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for
a term which may extend to three year and shall also be liable for fine.
EXPLANATION IN THIS REGARD:-
To define the word cruelty according to this section :-
(a) Any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the
woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life or
health( whether mental or physical) to the woman.
(b) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to
coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand
for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or
any person related to her to meet such demand.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 22/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Unit-II
Question No.17:-Distinguish between, Hurt and Grievous Hurt.
OR
The accused struck a woman, carrying an infant in her arms violently
over her head and shoulders. One of the blows fell on the child’s head
causing death. Of what offence is the accused guilty.?
OR
The accused demanded one anna from the deceased which the latter
owed him. The deceased promised to pay later and the accused
thereupon kicked him twice on the abdomen and the deceased
collapsed and died. Of what offence is the accused guilty.?
Answer :- INTRODUCTION :-
Hurt generally means injury on the body of a person. It is such an injury
which causes bodily pain or disease or infirmity or fracture or
disfigurement of face etc.
KINDS OF HURT
There are two kinds of Hurt:-
1. Simple Hurt.
2. Grievous Hurt.
1. Simple Hurt :- simple hurt is defined under section 319 of IPC
whereas the grievous hurt has been defined under section 320. Simple
hurt causes simple injury with simple bodily pain, while grievous hurt
causes serious injury and serious pain in the body too.
DEFINITION OF SIMPLE HURT:
Section 319 says that,” whoever causes bodily injury or pain or disease
or infirmity by an act to any other person, such act is called simple hurt.
Section 319 contains the following ingredients:-
a) Bodily Pain:- The words show that there must be some pain in the
body of a person. It means mental paid does not come under bodily
pain. Any such injury which causes pain on any external part of body
comes under simple hurt.
b) Disease : Disease means any illness. By such act which creates
weakness and if a man comes into contract of any disease then it will
come under simple hurt.
c) Infirmity:- Infirmity means by illness. By such act which creates
weakness in the body, comes under simple hurt.
d) To any other Person : The hurt must be caused to any other person
not to himself. In this way, in a simple hurt there is no need of physical
contact. A hurt may be caused by any mean or method. Such hurt must
cause bodily pain or disease or infirmity. Such hurt must be caused to
another person and not to himself.
e) Section 319 does not show that there must be direct physical contact
with another person for committing simple hurt.
2. Grievous Hurt : There are various kinds of grievous hurt which
have been defined in section 320 in IPC. Thus a hurt is more than a
slightly causing harm as defined in section 95 of IPC and less the
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 23/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
culpable homicide. If the hurt results into death land fulfils the
conditions of section 299 then it becomes culpable homicide, otherwise
it grievous hurt.
The grievous hurt can be classified/designated as under :-
a. Emasculation : The destruction of private organ of a human being
is known as emasculation. Any injury which makes a person incapable
for functioning of the private organ, person comes under grievous hurt.
b. Permanent privation of the sight of either eye if there is privation or
separation or destruction either eye of a person, is grievous hurt.
c. Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear. Similarly the
destruction or separation of either ear is grievous hurt. Here the power
of hearing must be affected. The eye and ears are the main functional
organs of a human being. They have is an important role in the life.
d. Privation of any member or joint: Privation of any member or joint
also comes under grievous hurt.
e. Destruction or permanent loss of the power of any member or
joint:- If there is destruction of any member of joint of the body then it is
also a grievous hurt or if any member or joint fails to work properly then
also it will comes under grievous hurt.
f. Permanent disfiguration of the head or face :- Permanent
disfiguration of the head or face means to cause such an injury on the
head or face that they look bad or head becomes crucial.
g. Fracture or dislocation of Bone or tooth:- When any bone or tooth is
dislocated it means they loss their original place. Fracture of any bones
comes under grievous hurt.
h. When there is an such hurt which endangers to life or which
causes paid continuously for a period of 20 days.
Endanger to life mean there must be death from such hurt. If the death
is caused by grievous then it will not be culpable homicide or murder
because there is no intention to cause death. So any hurt to create
danger to life is also called grievous hurt.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 24/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Unit-IV.
Question No.18:-Define Adultery and distinguish it from rape?
OR
Discuss fully the law relating to offence of Adultery. Is the present law
satisfactory or does it need change in the present day context?
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 25/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
ADULTERY RAPE
1. Adultery is an act which requires In case of rape the consent of
woman
The consent of both the parties. Is essential.
2. Woman must be married woman. It can be committed on any
woman,
i.e. the wife of another man. Married woman or widow.
3. Adultery cannot be committed Rape can be committed by a
husband
By a husband with his own wife . if she is below fifteen years
of age.
4 Adultery is an offence relating Rape is an offence against the
person
To marriage. Of the woman.
5 The aggrieved party is the In the rape the woman is
aggrieved p
Husband the wife having party.
Consented to the act.
6 Adultery is not so serious an It is against the will of the
women.
Offence as rape. And rape is a serious offence.
UNIT-III
Question No.19:- Discuss the ingredients of theft with the help of
decided case? Also distinguish between theft and extortion.
Answer :- Theft is an offence in which moveable property of a person is
taken away without his consent. Such property must be taken away
dishonesty. Thus in theft there would be a moveable property. It should
be taken dishonestly and without the consent of the owner. Theft has
been defined in Section 378 of IPC. Simultaneously the punishment for
the commitment of act of theft has also been defined in Section 379 of
IPC.
DEFINITION OF THEFT U/S 378 OF IPC
“ Whoever intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of
the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that
property in order to such taking is said to commit theft.”
INGREDIENTS OF DEFINITION
1. There must be a dishonest intention of a person to take the
property.
2. Removal of movable property.
3. Such movable property must be taken away.
4. The property must be taken away from the possession of a person.
In other words there must be a possession of that property.
5. Such property must be taken away without the consent of such
person.
A. Dishonest Intention:- It is also called as malafied intention which
can be representation in the form of mensrea. This mensrea is the base
of the theft. The petitioner must prove that a thing was taken away with
the dishonest intention.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 26/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 27/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
ILLUSTRATIONS :-
I) ‘A’ threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning Z unless Z
gives him money. He thus induces Z to give him money. ‘A’ has
committed extortion.
II) ‘A’ threatens Z that he will keep Z’s child in wrongful confinement
unless Z will sign and deliver to A a promissory note binding Z to pay
money to ‘A’. Z signs and delivers the note. ‘A’ has committed the
offence of extortion.
PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENCE OF EXTORTION
A has committed the offence of extortion. Punishment for EXTORTION
under section 384 of IPC,” Whoever commits extortion, shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three years, or with fine or with both.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEFT & EXTORTION
THEFT EXTORTION
1. The offender’s intention is to Consent is obtained by putting
the
Take away something without person, in possession of property.
The owner’s consent. In fear of injury to himself or to any
Other person, i.e. there is
wrongful
Obtaining of consent.
2. Theft is limited only to move- Both movable and immovable
Able property. Property may be the subject of the
Offence of extortion.
3. There is no element of force There is the element of force,
for
In theft. Property is obtained by putting a
Person in fear of injury to that
Person, or to any other.
4. The offender takes the Delivery of property as
distinct from
Property without the owner- taking away property is of its
Ship’s consent and hence essence.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 28/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
UNIT-II
Question :20 : Define “wrongful restraint” and “Wrongful confinement”
and distinguish between the two.
Answer :- INTRODUCTION:-
The expression “wrongful restraint” implies keeping a man out of a place
where he wishes and has a right to be.
DEFINITION,”WRONGFUL RESTRAINT”
According to section 339 of Indian Penal Code it lays down that,
”whoever voluntarily obstructs any person so as to prevent that person
from proceeding in any direction in which that person has a right to
proceed is said wrongfully to restraint that person.”
ILLUSTRATION:-
‘A’ obstruct a path along which Z has a right to pass. B not believing in
good faith that he has a right to stop the path, Z is thereby prevented
from passing A wrongfully restrains Z.
Similarly B threatens to set a salvage dog at Z if Z goes
along a path along which Z has a right to go. Z is this prevented from
going along that path. B thus wrongfully restrains Z.
WRONGFUL CONFINEMENT
According to section 340 of Indian Penal code it is lays down that,”
whoever wrongfully restrains any person in such a manner as to prevent
that person from proceeding beyond certain circumscribing limits is
said,” wrongfully to confine” that person.”
ILLUSTRATION NO 1:-
A causes Z to go within a walled space, and locks Z in. Z is thus
prevented from proceeding in any direction beyond the circumscribing
line of the wall. A wrongfully confines Z.
ILLUSTRATION NO.2 :-
Similarly, A places men with firearms at the outlets of a building, and
tells Z that they will fire at Z if Z attempts to leave the building. A
wrongfully confines Z.
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 29/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Q. No. 10: What do you mean by Extortion? When does extortion
amount to Robbery? Discuss.
ANS: INTRODUCTION :- The chief elements of extortion are the
intentional putting of a person in fear of injury to himself or another and
dishonestly inducing the person so put in fear to deliver to any person
any property or valuable security.
DEFINITION OF EXTORTION
Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear or any injury to that
person, or to any other, and thereby dishonesty induces the person so
put in fear to deliver any person any property or valuable security or
anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable
security, commits ‘Extortion’ under section 383 of IPC.
ESSENTIALS OF EXTORTION
According to section 383 of IPC the following are the essentials of
extortion :-
1. There must be a show of force or threat.
2. Such force or threat should be in the form of fear of injury.
3. Such injury may be for the person who is put under the fear or for
any other persons in which the former person has interest.
4. Such force should be shown with a view take a thing or property or
valuable security or sign or seal or a document.
5. There must be a dishonest intention.
Thus if the above elements are present then it is an offence of Extortion
dishonest intention is also an essential element of extortion.
DISHONEST INTENTION IS MEASURED FROM THE
CIRCUMSTANCES AND FACTS OF EACH CASE.
Any thing taken from a person at the point of pistol is an example of
extortion.
a) ILLUSTRATION :- ‘A’ threatens to publish a defamatory libel
concerning Z unless Z gives him money. He thus induces Z to give him
money. A committed Extortion.
b) ‘A’ threatens ‘Z’ that he will keep ‘Z’s child in wrongful confinement
unless Z will sign and deliver to A, a promissory note binding ‘Z’ to pay
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 30/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
money to ‘A’. Z signs and delivers the note to A. A has committed the
offence of extortion.
PUNISHMENT FOR EXTORTION U/S 384 IPC
Whoever commits the offence of extortion, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three
years, or with fine or with both.
28 comments:
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 31/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 32/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Reply
Replies
Reply
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 33/34
10/08/2019 Law Notes (LL.B Notes): Indian Penal Code
Thanks ...
Reply
Publish Preview
Home
kuklawnotes.blogspot.com/p/indian-penal-code.html 34/34