Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answer - Lito Languibo
Answer - Lito Languibo
ANSWER
2
10. That Paragraph 10 is admitted as to the filing of qualified
theft against the Plaintiff; it is denied as to the validity of the
Relocation Survey done by Engr. Alan Paglinawan; from where did
he based his survey; was it from Engineer’s Pinero’s Survey; it must
be noted that the land has no title and the Survey of Engr. Pinero did
not even cited any reference from where he based his survey; During
the Relocation Survey, it was Cesar Mabayao who pointed where the
bounderies are; defendant reacted, but Engr. Paglinawan said that
nothing can change the result of the survey; moreover, the result is
very questionable; Lito Lanquibo encroached about 11,745 square
meters and Raul Fujicawa 6, 262 sq. meters ; this totaled to 18,007
square meters; this situation implied that the plaintiff had never
occupied nor planted anything on the whole area he claimed;
3
16. That paragraph 16 is denied; defendant had no sufficient
knowledge as to the truthfulness and falsity thereof
PRAYER
LITO P. LANGUIBO
Defendant
I.D. No.
Assisted by:
LITO P. LANQUIBO
Affiant
I.D. No.
Doc No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series Of
5
6