Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Examine how the American short stories approach and represent gender and class. In
The issues of gender and class have been dominant throughout the development of the
American short story, from its early beginnings up to contemporary works. These stories
represent varying perspectives on the issues of class and gender, partly due to the differing
periods they were written. In this essay I will examine the way in which the issues of gender
and class are approached and represented in The Paradise of Bachelors and the Tartarus of
Maids by Herman Melville, and Are These Actual Miles? by Raymond Carver.
In the first of these stories, The Paradise of Bachelors and the Tartarus of Maids,
Melville examines patriarchal society, and adopts the form of a diptych in order to juxtapose
two very different spheres of life; the “Paradise” that is the luxurious lifestyle of upper class
Bachelors and the “Tartarus” of the exploited working class maids in the industrial age. By
themselves, the two sections of this work are very limited in terms of their scope, but when
combined in the diptych approach, the text takes on far greater meaning. Because of this it is
necessary to deal with the text in its entirety, rather than examining the two sections in
isolation. In this text it is also difficult to separate the issue of class from that of gender as the
Initially what we see in this story is the juxtaposition of the luxurious lives of the
Bachelors of London’s Temple-Bar and the hardship of the lives of young maids working in
terrible conditions in a New England paper mill. The Paradise of Bachelors is laden with
imagery of splendour and luxury. The very area of Temple-Bar is described as “honeycomb
of offices and domicils.” “Like any cheese it is quite perforated ... with the snug cells of
bachelors.”(Melville 73) These comparisons convey the luxury of this lifestyle, and
Andrew O’Tuama Literary Genre (ENG10030) 2
Melville’s later description of the dinner he and his bachelor companions share only further
emphasises this. This is given a stark contrast in the lives of the maids of the paper mill,
whose quarters have a “cheap, blank air”, and who serve the machines “as the slave serves
the Sultan”, becoming merely “cogs to the wheels” (Melville 83). The knowledge the narrator
gains from his experience of the mill allows him, as well as the reader, to truly judge the life
of the bachelors, and realise that it is only through the suffering of the working class maids
that their upper-class luxury can be attained and sustained. This realisation is apparent in his
final exclamation of “Oh! Paradise of Bachelors! and oh! Tartarus of Maids!” (Melville 90)
Yet there are similarities between these two worlds in the way that the values of
patriarchal society isolate both the male and the female. The ‘Old Bach’ tells the narrator that
“we will not have married women; they are apt to be off-and-on too much” (Melville 89). His
employees, the maids, work “twelve hours to the day, day after day, through the three
hundred and sixty-five days, excepting Sundays, Thanksgiving and Fastdays” (Melville 89),
until, like the girl with the “ruled and wrinkled” brow (Melville 83), they grow old enslaved
to the mill, and live in a sterility “enforced by the terms of their employment”. “To marry,
become fertile, and possibly have children would mean losing their jobs” (Weyler 465). This
realisation allows us to contrast this enforced sterility with the self-inflicted sterility of the
Temple-Bar Bachelors. They have disengaged themselves from active life in pursuit of
pleasure. They live vicariously through stories of each other’s past, and their pursuit of
pleasure has resulted only in stagnation and sterility (Weyler 464). Through Melville’s
diptych we see the negative effects of a class based, industrialised society in terms of class
In Raymond Carver’s Are These Actual Miles? a brief glimpse into one night in the
life of a middle-class American couple gives a thorough insight into the ideals and bleak
is almost tragic. This materialism seems to have taken the place of genuine affection in the
relationship of Leo and Toni. This absence of affection is palpable in the couple’s first
interaction. Carver reveals the formality of their relationship through careful use of dialogue.
“‘You have the pink slip?’...‘You’re sure?’ he says. ‘Make sure. You have to
When not discussing matters of wealth or material possessions their conversation moves to
superficial topics, such as when Toni asks Leo to tell him how she looks. Leo’s response
“‘You look fine,’ he says. ‘You look great’” is immediately robbed of any sense of affection
when qualified by adding “I’d buy a car from you any day.” (Carver 583) Their goodbye is a
formal affair: “‘Kiss kiss. Here,’ she says and points to the corner of her mouth. ‘Careful,’ she
says.” (Carver 584) From the outset we can see that their relationship is formal and strained,
and seems to lack emotional depth; an affliction caused by the values of their class.
This middle class focus on wealth and material possession is most forcefully conveyed
by the words of the car dealer. Toni tells Leo “he said personally he’d rather be classified a
robber or a rapist than a bankrupt.” (Carver 588) Within this class system bankruptcy is seen
almost as immoral, something to be looked on in disgust. We see that Toni feels the same way
about Leo’s situation. At the stories beginning she remarks “But you don’t have money...And
you’re credit’s lousy. You’re nothing...Teasing.” (Carver 583) Readers can sense a definite
underlying truth to her “teasing”, one which is enforced towards the end of the story when
Toni arrives home and screams in contempt “Bankrupt! ... You son of a bitch.” (Carver 589)
Toni was right. In the eyes of his class Leo is “nothing”. He understands this himself. He even
“considers whether he should go to the basement, stand on the utility sink, and hang himself
Andrew O’Tuama Literary Genre (ENG10030) 4
with his belt. He understands he is willing to be dead.” (Carver 586) Without his job, without
This also calls into question the issue of gender roles within this society. The role of
the male is a dominant theme in this story. It is fascinating how Leo’s male identity is so
inextricably linked to his professional life. While we see only one moment of his life, after he
has lost his job and been declared bankrupt, we can tell that there has been a reversal of roles
since this change took place. At the end of this story Leo is the picture of a broken man. He
approaches the man who his wife has returned home with at dawn, infidelity at the front of his
mind, and he avoids any confrontation. He scrambles to pull his torn shirt together, to look
respectable in front of the man who he is almost certain has just slept with his wife, and all he
can muster up the spirit to say is “Monday”, when he plans to piece together his life, like his
torn shirt. The loss of his job has left him emasculated and broken, and by appearing
respectable in front of this man he hopes to regain even a shred of his masculinity. Yet we
know that at one point in their relationship this situation was reversed. Leo had been
unfaithful to his wife while she was away with their two children. Although the reasons for
his infidelity are withheld, we can assume that that Leo was not the emasculated wreck that
we see at the time of the story’s events. If anything, these two events of infidelity show the
absence of affection in their relationship, which is based not on love but on each partner
Issues of gender and class have been present in the canon of American short story
since its beginning, despite the vast variation in approach and representation implemented by
different authors. By examining these two texts, Melville’s The Paradise of Bachelors and
the Tartarus of Maids, and Carver’s Are These Actual Miles? readers will hopefully gain an
insight into, and appreciation for these issues and how they are presented in the American
short story.
Andrew O’Tuama Literary Genre (ENG10030) 5
Works Cited:
Carver, Raymond, “Are These Actual Miles?” The Oxford Book of American Short
Stories. Ed. Joyce Carol Oates, New York: Oxford University Press 1992. 583-590
May, Charles E. “'Do You See What I'm Saying?': The Inadequacy of Explanation
and the Uses of Story in the Short Fiction of Raymond Carver” The Yearbook of
Melville, Herman, “The Paradise Of Bachelors and the Tartarus of Maids”, The
Oxford Book of American Short Stories. Ed. Joyce Carol Oates, New York: Oxford
and Metaphor” American Literature, Vol. 41, No. 3, November 1969, 389-405.
Weyler, Karen A. “Melville's ‘The Paradise of Bachelors and the Tartarus of Maids’: