Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Contemporary readers, especially youngsters, may find Shakespeare’s portrait of the oppression of
women shocking when compared to today’s values. At the time Shakespeare wrote his plays, women
were submissive and subordinate to men: they were not allowed to attend school and were absolutely
dependent on males, and this meant that marriages were usually arranged denying them the opportunity
of choosing a husband of their like.
And to make it worse, Shakespeare set this play in Athens, in ancient Greece, where equality was an
admired state, but only among free men. Women and slaves were accepted as having lower status. In
addition, the social class to which a person belonged largely dictated the amount of autonomy an
individual had. Authority of men with a higher status was absolute. The relationships, social norms,
gender roles and inequality were very strict for disobedient women; for at that time, there was a law
which was typical of a patriarchal society, this law decreed that a father had the right to marry his
daughter to the man of his choice or condemn her to death.
Nevertheless, after the initial shock we get at the very beginning of the play, where we can read how
Theseus, Duke of Athens, tells Hermia not to go against her father’s wishes, saying, ‘To you, your
father should be as a god;’ (1.1.47) and how Egeus asks for full penalty of law to fall on her, i.e. living
as a nun, abjuring forever the society of men, or being executed.
We will discover that Shakespeare used this conflict between father and daughter as the springboard to
deepen on the struggle of men to dominate women and, even though many scholars and critics are of the
opinion that he was a misogynist, female characters in this play are quite subversive and rebellious and
they fight to find themselves in order to be free of authoritative and sexual conflicts.
Do XXth and XXIst century adaptations and appropriations of the play reflect these strong-minded,
rebellious and fighting-for-their-right women? How have all the female characters been portrayed in
current productions?
Let’s see and study how Hippolyta, Hermia, Helena and Titania have been depicted in three different
modern adaptations of this play:
1. One film: Michael Hoffman's 1999 film version of A Midsummer Night's Dream
2. The novel Love in Idleness by Amanda Craig, 2003
3. The graphic novel The Sandman Vol 2. 19 written by Neil Gaiman and published by DC
Comics, 1990
4
Gaiman, Neil. Dream Country: A Midsummer Night’s Dream (The Sandman #19). D C Vertigo. 1990. P.13
5
Ídem. P.16
6
Íbidem. P.24
7
Íbidem. P.24
harmful.
Concluding remarks
The late twentieth and early twenty-first century have seen adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays to
different media and formats. Four hundred years after his death women have attained many rights they
did not have in Shakespeare’s days. So, we expect, in those adaptations see and watch powerful women
who are and fight to become the masters of their own destinies, just as great as they can be found in the
original text.
Nevertheless, we feel absolutely disappointed with Hoffman´s portrayal of women in his film and even
more with Amanda Craig´s one in her book. Neither of them has kept the sense of powerful, strong-
minded and no ordinary women Shakespeare characterized in his original play.
Against all odds, the only adaptation which is not faithfully focused on the story and which has been
written in a format which has always been regarded as the kind of work that attracts male teenagers
mostly is the one that best keeps the spirit of the relevance of women. Illustrator’s images in “The
Sandman” cooperate with Gaiman to bring his message across; we meet a lovely and queenly Titania,
who is the supplier of the attention children need. She is the one who takes Hamnet for herself, giving
him the attention that Shakespeare neglects.
This novel is a complex adaptation in which different layers of reality make readers reflect on our own
desires.
It comes as little surprise that this story won the World Fantasy Award for best short story in 1991
which was the first time ever for a comic to win a prize in the category of prose fiction.