Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture # 8
Turbomachinery for Liquid Rocket Engines
Copyright © 2003 1
Narayanan Komerath
Demands on Rocket Turbomachinery
•Huge propellant flow rates.
F1 (Apollo Saturn II first stage, LOX-RP1) 2600 kg/s
J2 (Apollo Saturn II 2nd & 3rd stages: LOX-LH2: 250 kg/s
SSME: LOX/LH2 468 kg/s
(Compare to 100 kg/s for typical 20,000 lbf thrust fighter engine)
•Huge pressures: 55MPa for SSME LOX pump; 45 MPa for LH2
•Very high Power per unit mass. SSME LH2 pump: 100HP per lb.
Copyright © 2003 2
Narayanan Komerath
Where we need turbopumps
Payload
Ratio Turbopump System
Gas Pressurized
System
∆u
Copyright © 2003 3
Narayanan Komerath
Successful Designs
RocketDyne Mark 3 (2500+ produced) or H-1 pump (below)
Both fuel and LOX pumps on the same shaft. Each has:
- Axial inducer – single centrifugal stage pump on the same
shaft.
history.nasa.gov/ SP-4206/p94.jpg
Copyright © 2003 4
Narayanan Komerath
A cutaway drawing of
the Mark 10
turbopump for the F-1
engine
http://history.nasa.gov/ SP-4206/ch4.htm
Copyright © 2003 5
Narayanan Komerath
SSME Turbopumps
LOX and LH2 inducers separated from respective pumps and driven by different
turbines at very different speeds. One centrifugal stage for LOX (highest
pressure); Three centrifugal stages for LH2. No gear reduction unit.
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net/photos/ssme3.gif
Copyright © 2003 6
Narayanan Komerath
Some Preliminary Design Considerations
Engine thrust requirement generates requirements for mass flow rate and
chamber pressure.
This leads to the requirement for the pump system mass flow rate and
exit pressure.
Centrifugal pumps allow much larger pressure rise per stage than axial pumps.
Also, easier to deal with fluid vaporization / multiphase flows in centrifugal
pumps than in axial pumps.
A centrifugal pump stage takes fluid in near the hub and sends it out near
the tip of the “Impeller”.
D1t D2t
Copyright © 2003 7
Narayanan Komerath
Inducer
At the first stage inlet of a centrifugal impeller, there is suction.
An “Inducer” is a pump which pressurizes fluid whose static pressure is
not much higher than its vapor pressure. This allows the propellant tank
pressure to be kept low, minimizing tank weight.
Without an inducer, the suction at the impeller inlet would boil the liquid
and cause “cavitation”. Cavitation has two terrible effects:
•Extended operation under cavitation (bubble form and burst, with very
large pressure fluctuations) erode and eventually destroy blade surfaces.
This is not a big deal for rocket pumps whose entire operation lifetimes are
measured in a few minutes.
•Formation of vapor blocks the flow passages and cuts down the mass
flow rate. Big problem.
An inducer pressure rise of 10%-20% prevents cavitation
Copyright © 2003 8
Narayanan Komerath
Net Positive Suction Head
How far the inlet pressure is above the vapor pressure. About 10 – 20% is
considered adequate to prevent significant cavitation problems.
Pi − Pvapor
NPSH = = net positive suction head (m, ft)
gρ
(Table B.1 – pp 696 Humble)
Copyright © 2003 9
Narayanan Komerath
Pump efficiencies vary with speed, size, propellant types.
Humble recommends (Pg. 212) 80% for LOX,
hp RP and other dense liquids; 75% for LH2
This power comes from the turbine
turbine gas
Specific Speed
γ −1
1 γ
Pturbine −avail = ηt mtCPTi 1 −
P
t − ratio
=(turbine efficiency) (mass flow through the turbine)(function of turbine
inlet temp. & turbine pressure ratio)
where
Pin
= Pt − ratio
Pout turbine
Copyright © 2003 10
Narayanan Komerath
ηT ≈ 70 % per Humble (varies)
mass flow rate depends on cycle choice, GG vs SC etc.
In balance,
Copyright © 2003 11
Narayanan Komerath
Example:
Fuel side
892lbm/s
H=4790ft
∆ηP = 65.8%
[ 2
32.2 ft / s ]
1kg
32.2lbm
[892lbm / s ][4790 ft ]
Ppump − req =
.658
Copyright © 2003 12
Narayanan Komerath
Turbine
(1BTU/s=1.41455HP )
O
F = .415forLOX / RP
Pi, Ti
γ ≈ 1.124
BTU
CP = .653
lbm − R 0 Pe
Ti = 14000 F = 1860R
ηT = 58.2%
Ptmt = 23.7
. lbm
m = 92
s
Copyright © 2003 13
Narayanan Komerath
BTU
Pturbine − avail = . 582 [92 lbm / s ]. 653 0
[1860 R ]
lbm − R
. 124
1 − 1 1 . 124
23 . 7
BTU 1.415HP
= 19169.2 =
s 1BTU / s
Copyright © 2003 14
Narayanan Komerath
Terminology
Stage specific speed
Nr Q m3 / s m.75
Ns = .75
= pump stage specific speed (units =
=
HP m.75
s1 / 2
n
In SI units, Humble recommends sizing Ns to be ~ 2 for LH2 and 3 for other liquids
as a reasonable compromise between pumping efficiency and high rad/s.
In the case of centrifugal pumps, stage specific speed indicates the ratio of
inlet diameters.
Low value indicates high friction losses in small passages
– low pump efficiency.
At high values (~ 8), it is better to use axial stages. For values between 3 and 5
for most liquids, centrifugal pumps give efficiencies on the order of 80%,
for centrifugal impellers diameters greater than 10 cm.
Copyright © 2003 15
Narayanan Komerath
Suction-specific speed Uss
Copyright © 2003 16
Narayanan Komerath
(Humble eq. 5.63)
= 130 LH2
90 cryogenics other than LH2
70 non-cryogenic liquids
Ω=
(
uss NPSH )
.75
Q
(this limits how fast the pump rotates)
Copyright © 2003 17
Narayanan Komerath
Turbo-machinery design variables
Pumps
Types of pumps
In SI units, Humble recommends sizing Ns to be ~ 2 for LH2 and 3 for other liquids
as a reasonable compromise between pumping efficiency and high rad/s.
Copyright © 2003 19
Narayanan Komerath
30Ω
Alternatively, N= RPM (revolutions per minute)
π
Copyright © 2003 20
Narayanan Komerath
Pump Size
Humble recommends taking the lower allowable Ω from the two expressions
(based on uss or Ns) if there is no boost pump, else just use the first formula (5.61).
Once we have Ω, we can estimate the pump size ( for a typical centrifugal pump
with an inducer) (empirical)
gHP
ut = = impeller tip speed (m/s)
nΨ
pump head coefficient
Ψ=
Use .60 for LH2 D1t D2t
.55 for others
2ut
D2t =
Nr
4
π Q
D1t = 3
(
φ Nr 1 − L2 )
Copyright © 2003 21
Narayanan Komerath
φ = inducer flow coefficient; Use 0.10
L = inducer Dhub ; Use 0.3
Dtip −inducer
.
Recall, required shaft power g mP H (numerator is fluid power)
Preq =
ηP
(pump efficiency ~ 80% - changes with Ns)
Copyright © 2003 22
Narayanan Komerath
Thinking ahead to system weight (empirical relationship)
Copyright © 2003 23
Narayanan Komerath
Compressor Basics
Copyright © 2003 24
Narayanan Komerath
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR
The tuboprop engine shown above uses
two stages of centrifugal compression.
Here the air enters the compressor close
to the hub, and is then impelled outwards
by the blades. It is then passed through an
expanding duct at the periphery before
being led back towards the hub for the
next compression stage. The blades that
push the air towards the periphery and
increase its momentum are the rotor
blades, while the expanding duct is the
stator or diffuser passage.
Copyright © 2003 25
Narayanan Komerath
Features of centrifugal compressors
142.26.194.131/systems1/Engines/ gas_turbine_engines.htm
Copyright © 2003 26
Narayanan Komerath
AXIAL COMPRESSOR
The compressor of the turbofan engine
shown above is axial: the air moves
primarily in a direction parallel to the axis
of the engine.
Each stage of the axial compressor consists of a rotor and a stator. Both
rotor and stator are made up of a large number of individual blades, which
are twisted airfoils, usually with a high degree of camber.
The rotor blades add work to the air, so that the stagnation enthalpy rises,
along with the stagnation temperature and stagnation pressure. This is
usually accompanied by an increase in the velocity.
The stator blade passages straighten out the flow and act as diffusers,
slowing down the flow and thus increasing the static pressure and static
temperature.
Copyright © 2003 27
Narayanan Komerath
The flow through an axial compressor can be considered to
consist of three types of flows:
Cz
2
A2
Cz
1
ρ1 A1cz1 = ρ2 A2cz 2
A1
Copyright © 2003 28
Narayanan Komerath
2. Flow over blade rows (cascades)
ROTOR STATOR
Streamline
Copyright © 2003 29
Narayanan Komerath
3. Secondary flows (recirculating flows, tip vortices, hub vortices,
rotor/stator interactions, etc.)
Stator
Interaction Inboard
Wake
Root Vortex Shock/Boundary layer Centrifugal
Interaction Effects
Copyright © 2003 30
Narayanan Komerath
FLOW THROUGH A SINGLE STAGE
Objectives:
Obtain expressions for
1. Torque and work per stage
2. Stagnation temperature rise
3. Stagnation pressure rise
4. Stage efficiency
5. Limiting pressure ratio per stage,
and relate these to the stage velocity diagrams.
Reference Frames:
The velocity of air at any station,
K measured with respect to the engine
c
walls, is called the "absolute velocity", denoted by G
w
The velocity of air Gmeasured relative to a rotor blade is
K G
Thus, c =U + w
G K
where the blade speed at that radius is U = Ωr ,
2π N
and | Ω |=
60
with N being the shaft speed in revolutions per minute (RPM).
Copyright © 2003 31
Narayanan Komerath
Velocity Diagrams for a Single Axial Stage
Note: Values in
diagram, such as U, change
from section to section
along same blade.
U
If a given streamline stays near
a given radial location, U
remains almost the same going
from rotor inlet through stator exit
- true in axial compressor. c1
c2
Ua
w1
w2
Copyright © 2003 32
Narayanan Komerath
Relation Between Work and Turning Angles
Conservation of Angular Momentum gives:
τ
= ( rcθ )2 − ( rcθ )1
m
Torque per unit mass flow rate = rate of change of angular momentum
Assuming that radial movement of the air is negligible within each stage.
Thus, air entering the stage at radius r will leave at the same radius r.
r1 = r2
U1 = U 2
Work done on the fluid per unit time per unit mass flow rate by the rotor is:
c1
Uτ
= U (cθ 2 − cθ 1 ) c2
r
Ua
w1
w2
Copyright © 2003 33
Narayanan Komerath
Relation Between Stagnation Temperature and
Flow Turning Angle
Work done by the stator is zero, because the stator blades do not move
with respect to the engine walls. Thus, there is no rise in stagnation
enthalpy in the stator.
Assuming
a) uniform stagnation enthalpy per unit mass along the radius of
the blades, and
b) Adiabatic conditions (heat transfer effects are negligible),
h02 − h01 = U (∆cθ ) ∆T0 U ( ∆cθ )
=
from which we get: T01 c pT01
h03 s − h01
η st ≡
h03 − h01
Thus, the pressure stage pressure ratio is related to the stage
temperature rise using the isentropic relations:
γ
P03 ∆T0 γ −1
= 1 + ηst
P01 T01
Copyright © 2003 35
Narayanan Komerath
Limits on Stage Pressure Ratio
1. Compressibility:
As the relative Mach number becomes supersonic, shock losses can
become substantial. In earlier compressors, the blade tip Mach number was
kept below 1.0 to avoid the transonic drag rise. This imposed a severe limit on
compressor shaft rpm, blade radius, and stage pressure ratio. In modern
compressors, the rotor operates in the transonic regime, with shocks present in
the rotor. While this causes some loss in stagnation pressure, much more work
can be done by each rotor stage, and the shock provides a convenient way of
increasing static pressure. As a result, stage pressure ratio is higher, and the
overall weight of the compressor is reduced.
Copyright © 2003 36
Narayanan Komerath
2. Flow Separation:
Usually, this is what limits the stage pressure ratio. Note that
the flow in the compressor stage is moving against an adverse pressure
gradient. Boundary layers thicken, and may separate if the pressure
gradient becomes too large. This can be expressed using the pressure
coefficient
2
w2 The limiting value of the
Cp ≡ 1− for the rotor
pressure coefficient is
w1 usually around 0.6 to avoid
flow separation.
2
c3 for the stator
Cp ≡ 1−
c2
Copyright © 2003 37
Narayanan Komerath
p2
= 1 + 0.5γ C p M 12 rel
p1
This shows why the stage pressure ratio is usually limited to about 1.4
for subsonic rotors. Under extreme conditions, transonic stages can
reach stage pressure ratios as high as 2.2.
log10 (π c )
n≥
log10 (π st )
Copyright © 2003 38
Narayanan Komerath
Efficiency of Multistage Compressors
Usually, axial compressors have several stages. The efficiency of a
compressor depends not only on the design of each stage, but also on the
overall pressure ratio. In other words, given the same level of technology, a
compressor with a higher pressure ratio will have a lower efficiency. This
can be seen by relating the stage efficiency to the overall compressor
efficiency.
Polytropic efficiency:
This is a useful concept to define the level of technology of the
compressor. It is defined as the ratio of the ideal work required for a given
differential pressure change to the actual work required.
dh0 s
ec ≡
dh0
Copyright © 2003 39
Narayanan Komerath
Using this definition, simple thermodynamics can be used to show that the
compressor efficiency and stage efficiency become
γ −1
ηc =
( )
πc γ −1 and ( π st )
γ −1
γ −1
γ −1 ηst = γ −1
( )
π c γ ec −1 (π st ) γ ec −1
n γ −1
where 2 and 3 refer to stations
T03
T02 j =1
( )
= ∏ 1 + η st π cj γ − 1 upstream and downstream of the
compressor
Copyright © 2003 40
Narayanan Komerath
Illustration
Using the above expressions, the stage pressure ratio is 1.22284. The
polytropic efficiency is 0.932, slightly higher than the stage pressure
ratio as expected, and the compressor efficiency is obtained as 0.8965.
Copyright © 2003 41
Narayanan Komerath
Degree of Reaction
Copyright © 2003 42
Narayanan Komerath
Solidity
The solidity of a stage is defined as the ratio of the blade chord to the
blade spacing. If the solidity is low, there is less friction in the flow,
but the blades have to work harder, and thus the pressure gradient is
worse. If the solidity is high, the frictional losses are greater, but the
machine can operate over a wider range of inlet conditions.
Generally, the solidity is around 1.
Copyright © 2003 43
Narayanan Komerath
AXIAL TURBINES
Differences between flow field characteristics of turbines and compressors
Compressor Turbine
Adverse pressure gradient Favorable pressure gradient
Low stage pressure ratio (1.2 to 2) High stage pressure ratio (> 4)
Limited by stall Limited by choking and blade stress
Rotor Blade
Nozzle Exhaust
Rotor Disc
Nozzle Rotor
Streamline
1 2 3
Direction
of Blade Motion Copyright © 2003 45
Narayanan Komerath
Using the same nomenclature as for the axial compressor stage
velocity diagram,
W = U (cθ 2 − cθ 3 )
Copyright © 2003 46
Narayanan Komerath
Impulse Stage
In an impulse turbine stage, the entire pressure drop occurs in the
nozzle. The velocity diagram is shown below:
Nozzle Rotor
c2
Streamline
U
c3
w3
1 2 3
Direction
G G of Blade Motion
| w2 |=| c3 |
G K
| c2 |=| w3 | The velocity triangles become symmetric
Copyright © 2003 48
Narayanan Komerath