Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/318529080
CITATIONS READS
0 325
3 authors:
Belarmin Xavier
Amal Jyothi College of Engineering
3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Variation of soil amplification with respect to ground water table View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Kiran Somasundar M on 19 July 2017.
Abstract— In the response spectrum analysis, the method MIDAS) have come up with a „Dominant Mode signage‟
prescribed for seismic analysis of multi-storied buildings in IS feature by which, after determining the forces (BM, AF, SF
1893(part-1)2002, like other similar codes, is the method of etc)by SRSSing those from individual modal force sets applies
combining the modal responses, followed by combining them by signs to those values with that of the results obtained from
the SRSS or CQC to obtain the final response forces for design.
analysing for modal loads corresponding to that mode
This method is referred to, by the authors, as the Indirect
method, since it is not the modal loads that are combined, but the dominant in that direction Thus the results for the seismic
modal responses. One drawback often pointed out concerning analysis in X direction are the modal forces from each mode in
this method is that the resulting responses lose their signs in the X direction combined by SRSS and given the sign of the
process of combination by SRSS (or CQC). One method to modal forces of that mode which is dominant in the X
overcome this is known as 'Dominant mode signage', available in direction.
few of the analysis and design packages, like STAAD.Pro and
MIDAS/Gen. In this paper, a new method of analysis is being Here a new approach is being investigated where,
investigated, referred to by the authors, as the Direct method, instead of analysis for the modal loads and SRSSing the
where, instead of combining the modal responses by SRSS, the
results, the load themselves are combined by SRSS and
modal (lateral) loads itself are combined by SRSS before
applying on the building model. applied as a single load on the structure This method, referred
to here is the „Direct method‟, is at present recommended only
Keywords—modes, response spectrum analysis for applying multi modal lateral loads for pushover analysis.
II. METHODOLOGY
I. INTRODUCTION
The codal procedure recommended for Response A. Response Spectrum Analysis
Spectrum Analysis is referred in this report as the „Indirect
Method‟, where the modal loads(ie, the set of lateral loads Response spectrum analysis is performed using multi-
corresponding to each mode)are applied on the structure, one mode responses, where the free vibration modes are computed
at a time and the modal forces(ie, the member forces obtained using Eigen vector analysis.
from the analysis for each modal loads(Bending moment BM,
The modal parameters for a structure come as pairs of Natural
Shear force SF, Axial Force AF, etc )are combined by the
Frequency f (in Hz) and Mode shape ∅ or time period T, which
SRSS(Square Root of Sum of Squares hereafter referred to as
is its reciprocal(in s). The modal parameters for few of the
SRSS) The procedure has the drawback that, in case of lower frequencies are considered for further calculations (7 8 4
columns, in the process of combination of modal forces from 2, IS:1893(Part 1)-2002), based on the following.
individual modes by SRSS, the interaction of AF‟s with its
corresponding BM‟s from within each modal force set is lost, Modes for frequencies > 33 Hz need not be
as AF‟s from all modal forces are combined, and finally the considered
interaction is between the combined AF‟s and combined BM‟s The number of modes considered should be such that
Also in the process of combining by SRSS, the signs of forces the total mass participation factor should be at least
(AF and BM) are lost, ending up with positive signs for all 90%
forces.
As a probable solution to the latter (ie, loss of signs), Missing mass correction for modes having frequency
some of the analysis‟ software packages (eg STAAD Pro and beyond 33Hz
For the modal parameters considered, the following factors are respective Earthquake forces. Then for each of these
determined for each mode earthquake forces, we obtain respective Bending moments.
These Bending moments are SRSSed to obtain a single
• Mode participation factor of each mode Pk Bending moment.
Where,Z-Zone factor
Mode1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Mode 5
I-Importance factor
R-Response reduction coefficient
For each mode we calculate earthquake forces for each
Sa/g-Spectral Acceleration coefficient where the Horizontal level
acceleration Sa/g is determined from the Response spectrum
curve (Fig 2,IS:1893(Part1)-2002)
B. Combination of modes
1)Indirect Method of Analysis: Consider five modes for a Mode1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Mode 5
building. For each of the five modes, we can calculate
For each mode, respective earthquake forces are calculated Table 2 : Time period and Frequency
and combined by SRSSing Perio 0.694 0.222 0.123 0.085 0.065
d (sec)
Freq(Hz) 1.441 4.51 8.098 11.78 15.31
Mode I II III IV V
MODES>
LEVELS V 1 2 3 4 5 Combination of modes is explained earlier to get the final
1 0 0 0 0 0 results.
2 0.151 -0.53 0.824 -1 1
3 0.389 -1 0.861 -0.047 -0.838
4 0.58 -0.98 -0.24 0.999 0.027
5 0.763 -0.41 -1 -0.285 0.813
Period 0.693 0.221 0.123 0.084 0.065
Time period and frequency is also obtained from software
Sa/g 1.441 2.5 2.5 1.1273 1.0979
III. CONCLUSION
The theoretical study of different types of application of
modes gave different results. That is for the same Earthquake
Forces acting on a structure, when applied in two methods
gave different results. The advantage of the new methods (i.e.,
Direct method and Dominant mode method)will preserve the
sign of the Bending moment and gives more accurate values.
For checking the methods in an economical manner, we have
to compare these methods with a time history analysis results
and check which methods gives reinforcement Asc that is
closer in values to the reinforcement required by the time
History analysis.
IV. REFERENCES