Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ESweigart - OL539 The Road To Expert Leader - 081119
ESweigart - OL539 The Road To Expert Leader - 081119
Elizabeth A. Sweigart
As Mintzberg (2011) pithily stated, "Leadership is earned, not anointed" (p. 9). In this
regard, both leaders and the leadership they exhibit must grow and develop. Although
circumstances may influence the timing of this growth and development—for instance, high-
pressure situations such as military combat may accelerate substantially the rate at which one
develops as a leader—there is consensus in the literature that acquiring the skills and abilities of
a leader is an ongoing process (Day, Harrison, & Halpin, 2009). Moreover, as Day et al. (2009)
note, as leaders advance within organizations, "technical skills become less important for success
than a systems perspective and the ability to integrate the activities of specialists" (p. 121). In
addition to demonstrating basic management and administrative acumen, other competencies like
emotional intelligence and social intelligence are critical to the success of a leader (Day et al.,
2009). More and more, research is showing that leaders can be grown rather than simply being
created as such (Day et al., 2009). Continuous learning and reflection leads to mastery and
expertise (Day et al., 2009). Thus, the process of becoming an expert leader is complex and takes
Foundational skills
Mintzberg (2011) writes that, "leadership cannot simply delegate management; instead of
distinguishing managers from leaders, we should be seeing managers as leaders, and leadership
as management practiced well" (p. 9, emphasis in original). In this vein, certain basic skills and
abilities—such as "planning, organizing, controlling, and coordinating" (Day et al., 2009, p. 121)
Similarly, there is the expectation that leaders possess technical skills commensurate with
their tenure, representing "domain-specific knowledge…in their respective areas" (Day et al.,
ROAD TO EXPERT LEADER 3
2009, p. 121). Examples of technical skills include knowledge of and experience with applicable
federal, state, and local laws governing real property for a mortgage broker, oil and gas well
control for a drilling manager, and expectations for literacy development milestones for early
learning teachers. However, these abilities alone are insufficient to advance a leader from novice
to expert (Day et al., 2009). Even when a leader has passed from declarative knowledge of a
technical subject (i.e., having learned facts about a task by performing it), to knowledge
compilation (i.e., the acquisition of greater detail enables the individual to perform the task with
less thought), to procedural knowledge (i.e., the individual has practiced the task sufficiently to
have attained mastery)—it is not enough to be deemed expert at leading others (Day et al., 2009).
and the ability to discern other's emotions have been suggested as important leadership skills"
(Day et al., 2009, p. 122). Categorized as emotional intelligence, these skills represent an ability
learned over time that comes from self-awareness on the part of the leader derived from exposure
to multiple scenarios involving conflicting emotions of the leader and others resulting in both
positive and negative outcomes (Day et al., 2009). Similarly, social intelligence—the ability to
productively engage and solve problems interpersonally—is critical to success as a leader (Day
et al., 2009). As with emotional intelligence, social intelligence encompasses a set of learned
When considering the differences between novice and experienced leaders, problem
solving leveraging emotional- and social-intelligence skills provides insight. Broadly speaking,
there are two types of problem-solving scenarios: cued and not cued (Day et al., 2009). As Day et
al. (2009) notes, "Cued scenarios involve choosing among a set of alternatives, whereas uncued
ROAD TO EXPERT LEADER 4
(sic) problem solving involves creating and formulating responses" (p. 123). For a leader without
and emotional self-regulation skills may also be emerging, solving problems without reference
points to consider could be a substantial challenge. Even if the leader was skilled technically,
misreading the interpersonal dynamics of a difficult situation could result in a negative outcome,
possibly harming the personnel, the organization, and the leader's brand. It is true for both
technical and social- and emotional-intelligence skills that "deliberate practice is needed to
develop expertise" (Day et al., 2009, p. 126). Some research suggests that "the highest levels of
human performance across different domains can only be obtained after approximately 10 years
of extended, daily amounts of deliberate practice activities" (Day et al., 2009, p. 124).
Ultimately, as Day et al. (2009) articulate it, the distinction between novice and expert
leadership is observable and quantifiable resulting from the leader's growth through experience
over time. This leadership maturity curve supports the assertion that leader development is an
ongoing, iterative process that takes place across adulthood and because the learning is adult-
centered, adult-driven, and the responsibility of the adult, it fits the method and practice of
androgogy rather than pedagogy (Day et al., 2009). As noted above, the emotional intensity of
events may influence the overall duration of a leader's maturation, but it does not absent them the
failure—are all necessary to achieve mastery and expertise as a leader, inarguably a lifelong
References
Day, D. V., Harrison, M. M., & Halpin, S. M. (2009). An integrative approach to leader
Psychology Press.