Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DISINFECTION IN
PROSTHODONTICS
Presented by:
Dr. Jehan Dordi
I year MDS
1
Contents
• Introduction
• Terminologies
• Need for Sterilization and Disinfection
• Difference between Sterilization and Disinfection
• Sterilization
• Methods of Sterilization
• Recent Advances
• Test for sterilization
• Disinfectants
• Methods of disinfection
• Levels of disinfection
• Spaulding's Classification
• Unit Dose Concept
2
• Sterilization in Prosthodontic practice
• Disinfectants in Prosthodontic practice
• Management of Infectious Patient
• Management of Implant room/Operation Theatres.
• Review of literature
• References
3
INTRODUCTION
4
Terminologies
• Sterilization: It is defined as a process by which article, surface or medium is freed of all living
micro-organisms either in vegetative or spore state.
5
• Antiseptics: They are agents that can be safely applied on the skin or mucous membrane to
prevent infection by inhibiting the growth of bacteria.
• Bactericidal agent/ germicides: They are substances that can kill bacteria.
• Bacteriostatic agents: They prevent the multiplication of bacteria which may, however, remain
alive.
• They are found in the surroundings, on inanimate objects and on the surface of the human body.
• Since they cause contamination, infection and decay, it becomes necessary to remove or destroy
them.
7
• All hospitals need to sterilize their equipment and supplies. Even the smallest private clinic
requires sterile surgical instruments for minor procedures, and sterile dressing materials.
• If a hospital has a full surgical unit, the sterilization of surgical instruments and linen, together
with dressing materials for the wards and operating theatre, plays a key role in infection control.
8
Disinfection Sterilization
This technique minimizes the number of This technique is the elimination of all the
microorganisms but does not eliminate them microorganisms.
completely.
This method does not eliminate bacterial spores This method kills bacteria as well as vegetative
spores
It is not an absolute condition It is an absolute condition
Disinfectants are commonly used in daily life Sterilization is used in surgical operations and
various labs where sterile conditions are pre-
requisite. 9
Disinfection Sterilization
Disinfection process do not require a strict The sterilization process are well laid down and
guidelines to be followed follow a strict protocol to completely kill the
pathogens.
Disinfected objects have less number of micro- No viable organisms present on sterilized items
organism
10
STERILIZATION
11
Methods of Sterilization
Chemical agents
Physical agents
1. Alcohols: ethyl, isopropyl, trichlorobutanol
1. Sunlight
2. Aldehydes: formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde
2. Drying
Orthophthalaldehyde
3. Dry heat: By flaming, incineration
3. Peracetic acid,
or using hot air
4. Hydrogen peroxide
4. Moist heat: By boiling, steam at
atmospheric pressure, steam above 5. Hypochlorous acid
atmospheric pressure 6. Dyes
5. Filtration: Using candles, asbestos 7. Halogens
pads, membranes
8. Phenols
6. Radiation
9. Surface-active agents
7. Ultrasonic and sonic vibrators
10. Metallic salts
11. Gases: ethylene oxide, formaldehyde, beta
12
propiolactone
PHYSICAL AGENTS
• Sunlight: Active germicidal effect due to combined effect of Ultraviolet rays and heat rays.
• Drying: 4/5th of weight of bacterial cell consist of water and hence drying has a deleterious
effect on many bacteria.
• Heat: The killing effect of heat is due to protein denaturation, damage by oxidising molecules,
destroying cell constituents and the toxic effect of elevated levels of electrolyte.
14
• Hot air oven: This is the most widely used method of sterilization by dry heat. Sterilization is
achieved by conduction.
• The heat is absorbed by the surface of the item to be sterilized, which then penetrates to the
centre, until the entire item reaches the desired temperature.
• A holding period of 160 degree for 2 hours is necessary to sterilise glassware, forceps, scissors,
scalpels, all glass syringe, swabs.
16
Sterilisation control for hot air oven:
Physical:
Chemical:
18
Moist heat
20
Temperature at 100°C
21
Steam at atmospheric pressure (100°):
22
Tyndallisation or Intermittent Sterilisation:
Principle:
• The large reduction in volume sucks in more steam and the process continues till the
temperature of that surface equalizes with that of steam. Condensed water ensures moist heat for
killing the microbes present on the material.
25
Types of autoclaves
26
• Gravity displacement autoclaves are small,
automatic bench-top autoclaves. They work
on the principle of downward displacement
of air as a consequence of steam entering at
the top of the chamber.
• Type N: air removal in type N sterilizers is achieved by passive displacement with steam. They
are non-vacuum sterilizers designed for non-wrapped solid instruments.
• Type B (vacuum): these sterilizers incorporate a vacuum stage and are designed to reprocess
load types such as hollow, air-retentive and packaged loads. A number of different cycles may
be provided.
• Each cycle should be fully validated and used in accordance with instructions provided by both
the sterilizer manufacturer and the instrument manufacturer(s).
28
The sterilization cycle
• The sterilization cycle can be divided into three periods: the heating-up period, the holding
period and the cooling period.
• For the N-type non-vacuum bench-top autoclave (routinely used in dentistry), this entails:
• 1. Removal of air by a vacuum pump or downward displacement of air by incoming steam while
the chamber is heated to the selected temperature.
• 2. Holding the load, which is sterilized, for the appropriate period at the selected temperature
and pressure.
29
• 3. Drying the load to its original condition by a partial vacuum (this is assisted by the heat from
the jacket)
• Sterilization control is similar to that of dry heat sterilization as described earlier except for the
use of Geobacillus stearothermophilus, which is used as the test organism for checking
sterilization by steam under pressure.
• This is a thermophilic organism with an optimum growth temperature of 55- 60°C and its spores
require an exposure of 12 minutes at 121 °C to be killed.
• Biological indicators are the only process indicators that directly monitor the lethality of a given
sterilization process.
31
Test for Sterilization
• If the process has been satisfactory, the strip will change its color completely.
32
Filtration
Types of filters
34
Membrane filters
2. Ionizing.
• Infrared and ultraviolet rays are of the non-ionizing, low-energy type, while gamma rays and
high-energy electrons are the ionizing, high energy type.
36
Non-ionizing radiation:
37
Ionizing radiation:
• Flash sterilization is considered acceptable for processing cleaned patient-care items that cannot
be packaged, sterilized, and stored before use.
• It also is used when there is insufficient time to sterilize an item by the preferred package
method.
41
Effects of sterilization on periodontal instruments, JOP, vol 53, no:7, 2011.
DISINFECTANTS
42
CHEMICAL AGENTS
6. Be stable
43
Mode of action of chemical agents:
1. By protein coagulation
3. By removal of free sulfhydryl groups essential for the functioning of the enzymes
44
Alcohols
• Ethyl alcohol (ethanol) and isopropyl alcohol are the
most frequently used. They are used mainly as skin
antiseptics at a concentration of 60- 90% in water.
48
• Peracetic acid has a good sterilization effect on
bacteria, particularly common antibiotic-resistant
bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and
Clostridium difficile.
51
Halogens
• Iodine in an aqueous and alcoholic solution
has been widely used as a skin disinfectant.
It is bactericidal, with moderate action
against spores. It is active against the
tubercle bacteria and viruses.
52
• Chlorine and its compound hypochlorite
have been used as disinfectants over time.
They are markedly bactericidal and virucidal.
53
Phenols
• These compounds are obtained by distillation of
coal tar between temperatures of 170°C and 270°C.
54
• Phenols is widely used as disinfectants in hospital.
Commonly used compounds are Lysol and cresol
They are not readily inactivated by the presence of
organic matter; hence, they are good general
disinfectants
55
Commonly used disinfectants & their concentrations
56
Gases
• Ethylene oxide: This is a colorless liquid with a
boiling point of 10.7C and highly penetrating at
normal temperature and pressure.
57
• It acts by alkylating the amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl and sulfhydryl groups in protein molecules
within the microbes and spores. It also reacts with DNA and RNA (rendering them virucidal). It
is potentially toxic to human beings, causing mutagenicity and carcinogenicity.
• It diffuses through many types of porous materials and readily penetrates some plastics.
• It has a wide application within and outside the hospital. It is unsuitable for fumigating rooms
because of its explosive property.
58
Formaldehyde gas:
59
• Betapropiolactone: This is a condensation
product of ketane and formaldehyde. It is no
longer used for fumigation as it is
carcinogenic.
60
Surface-active agents
61
Mechanism:
• These act on the phosphate groups of the cell membrane and also enter the cell. The membrane
loses its semi-permeability and the cell proteins are denatured. They act on bacteria, but have no
action on spores, tubercle bacilli and most viruses.
62
Metallic salts
63
• Thimerosal, phenyl mercury nitrate and mercurochrome are less toxic and are used as mild
antiseptics and have marked bacteriostatic but weak bactericidal and limited fungicidal action.
64
LEVELS OF DISINFECTION
65
• High-level disinfectant: This is a chemical that kills all microbial pathogens except large
numbers of spores. It may have some activity against a smaller number of spores if the contact
time is increased.
• Uses: They are active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, spores and M.
tuberculosis
66
• Intermediate-level disinfectant: A chemical that kills all microbial pathogens including
mycobacteria and non-enveloped viruses except spores.
67
• Low-level disinfectant: A chemical that kills only vegetative bacteria, fungi and lipid-
enveloped viruses.
• Uses: Kill most bacteria and most fungi, but not M. tuberculosis or spores
68
INSTRUMENT CLASSIFICATION BASED
ON POTENTIAL TO SPREAD INFECTION
(Spaulding's classification)
69
• In 1968, Dr. E. H. Spaulding classified medical/surgical instruments as
• Critical,
• Semi-critical and
• Non-critical based on their potential to spread infections.
• The classification helps to decide how to proceed with the instruments.
70
Critical items
• Unit dose concept was introduced with purpose- to minimize cross contamination.
74
STERILIZATION IN PROSTHODONTIC
PRACTICE
75
Sterilization of Diagnostic Instruments (Mouth mirror, Probe, Explorer)
• Dry the diagnostic instrument with help of wipes. Only absolutely dry instruments must be
placed in the sterilizer, in order to avoid calciferous deposits and/or water spots. Instruments are
autoclaved at 121° C.
• In order to prevent staining and corrosion, the steam must be free of particles. When several
instruments are sterilized, the maximum capacity of the sterilizer must not be exceeded.
• After sterilization instruments must be stored and transported in the rooms and containers
designated by the practice. The instruments should be processed as soon as possible after use.
76
Sterilization of Impression Trays
• After the impression has been removed from the metallic impression trays the trays are washed
with running water and are made free from the particles adhering to it.
• The trays are the properly dried and placed in autoclave for sterilization at 121° C.
77
Sterilization of Handpiece
• Several ways to control the spread of contaminating matter between two patients have been
recommended.
• The most common methods of asepsis control are as follows: Protection from any contact with
the fluids present within the oral environment, Chemical disinfection, Thermal sterilization
Disinfection using microwaves, Disinfection via irrigation, Single use hand-pieces.
• Among the above techniques, moist heat using saturated water vapor's (autoclave) offers the
best results as regards the sterilization of handpieces in the short time.
78
• Step 1. After the end of the dental procedure the handpiece must be operated for 5-10 seconds
over the wash basin or a similar container while ejecting water and air.
• Step 2. Then, after being detached from the tubing's and connections with the unit, it must be
meticulously washed and brushed under running water.
• Step 4. After external cleaning, the handpiece is reconnected to the tubing's and operated for 3-5
seconds only with air so that any water residues are removed from the interior of the tubing.
79
• Step 5. Then, the handpiece is lubricated with the lubricant recommended by the manufacturer
and operated again for 10-20 seconds only with air so that the lubricant is properly distributed
throughout the sensitive areas of the head of the handpiece.
• Step 6. After the end of this procedure, the handpiece along with the bur extractor are enclosed
in a special pouch which is made airtight with either a self-adhesive tape or a thermosealer.
• Step 7. The handpiece and the bur extractors are placed in the autoclave, taking care not to
over-pack the pouches and ensuring that the air can pass unhampered.
80
• Depending on the manufacturer's indications, the autoclave is programmed to operate at 121C
for 20 minutes or at 134 C for 13 minutes.
• After these cycles have finished, the handpieces and the bur extractors are sterilized and are
ready to be used.
• Step 8. Just before re-use, some handpieces must be lubricated again with an appropriate
lubricant.
81
82
83
84
Sterilization of Burs
• Burs should be sterilized independently of their type or the area of the mouth in which they have
been used.
• Step 1. A necessary step prior to sterilizing a bur is meticulous cleaning to remove tooth debris,
residues of dental materials, blood clots or a paste-like mixture with saliva of all the above.
• The most widely accepted cleaning method for burs and other micro instruments are ultrasonic
devices (baths) using suitable solutions and with the addition of enzymes with a proteolytic
action.
85
• In these baths using suitable solutions at a temperature of about 60°C, burs vibrate at a
frequency of 60-80 kHz for at least 15 minutes. After the end of this procedure, burs are free
from foreign matter as well as oxides which are very often deposited on their shank.
• Step 2. After removal from the ultrasonic bath, burs must be dried using absorbent paper and hot
air.
• Step 3. They must then be placed in an appropriate device for sterilization, depending on the
material they are made of.
• More specifically:
1) Burs made of common carbon steel should not be placed in the autoclave because they will
undergo oxidation.
86
3) Dry heat ovens, ovens for chemical vapor sterilization and ethylene oxide ovens are suitable for
sterilizing all types of burs. However, dry heat ovens, due to prolonged heating involved, may
seriously damage the cutting edge of the burs.
4) Using various aldehydes and phenols for at least 30 minutes offers adequate sterilization while
after 10 hours chemical sterilization is achieved. Nevertheless, they may damage the integrity of
rotating cutting instruments.
87
88
89
Sterilization of Facebows & Bite forks
• Parts of facebow which are made of metal can be sterilized in autoclave.
• Before facebow and bite fork is kept in autoclave it is necessary to wipe it with dry cloth.
90
Sterilization of Dental Implants.
• Transfers, Analogs, Drivers, Overdenture, Abutments, Transfer screws, Drill Extension, Parallel
Pin, Transfer Screws and plastic handle.
• It is recommended to sterilize the components and instruments prior to placing in oral cavity.
• If modification has been made to the components and instruments clean prior to sterilization.
91
Steps in Pre-cleaning of components:
• Remove the debris in lukewarm water (<40 C) and immerse devices in cleaning solution
93
Scrub the component with nylon brush
until visible soil and all debris are
removed.
94
Components are loaded in a instrument tray before
placing in washer/ disinfector.
95
Sterilization of implant components
• Inspection: Before sterilization visual inspection for cleanliness should be performed with
magnifying glasses.
• Sterilization: Steam sterilize the device in a sterilization pouch for 4 mins at 132 C. Dry the
device for 20 mins
96
DISINFECTION IN PROSTHODONTIC
PRACTICE
97
Methods Of Disinfecting Impressions
1. Spraying
2. Immersion
98
Different Impressions
Beyerle, M.P., Hensley, D.M., Bradley Jr, D.V., Schwartz, R.S. and Hilton, T.J., . Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part I: Microbiology.
99 Int J
Prosthodont.2014, 7(3),234-8
• Agar- Reversible Hydrocolloid: Found to be stable when immersed in 1:10 dilution sodium
hypochlorite or 1:2 iodophor.
100
Giblin, J., Podesta, R. and White, J., Dimensional stability of impression materials immersed in an iodophor disinfectant. Int J Prosthodont. 2010, 3(1). 72-7
Zinc Oxide Eugenol Immersion
Olsson, S., Bergman, B. and Bergman,M., Zinc oxide-eugenol impression materials. Dimensional stability and surface detail sharpness following treatment with disinfection solutions
101 Swed
Dent J.2012, 6(4),177.
Impression Compound
• Immersion in 1:10 dilution
sodium hypochlorite or
iodophor for specified time
period has been found to
be useful for disinfecting
impression compound
impressions.
102
Bhat, V.S., Shetty, M.S. and Shenoy, K.K., Infection control in the prosthodontic laboratory. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2007, 7(2),62.
Elastomeric Impression Materials
103
Thouati, A., Deveaux, E., Iost, A. and Behin, P., Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants. J Prosthet Dent. 2016, 76(1),8-14.
Polyether:
• Spraying in iodophor, 0.5% Sodium
hypochlorite should be used.
Drennon, D.G. and Johnson, G.H., The effect of immersion disinfection of elastomeric impressions on the surface detail reproduction of improved104
gypsum
casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2012, 63(2),233-241.
Disinfection Of Wax Bites & Wax Rims
• Wax rims and wax bites should be disinfected by the
spray wipe spray method using an iodophor. Rinse &
spray may be more appropriate for wax bites.
105
Disinfection Of Bite Registrations
• Bite registrations made of various materials or compound can
be handled in the same manner as impressions of the same
materials.
107
Disinfection Of Custom acrylic resin impression trays
108
Dental Prosthesis and Appliances
109
• Damage of heat cured denture base resin has been shown to occur after only 10 minutes of
immersion in a glutaraldehyde with phenol buffer, although immersion in 2% alkaline
glutaraldehyde did not damage the acrylic surfaces.
• Given the tissue toxicity of glutaraldehyde's and phenolic, however iodophors or chlorine
compounds are preferred for disinfection of acrylic appliances.
• Prostheses never should be stored in a disinfectant before insertion. After disinfection and
thorough rinsing, acrylic items can be stored in diluted mouthwash until inserted.
110
• Cast partial dentures are disinfected
using iodophors solution or 2%
glutaraldehyde solution for 10
minutes.
111
• Fixed metal/porcelain prosthesis may be disinfected by
immersion in glutaraldehyde's for the time
recommended for tuberculocidal inactivation by the
disinfectant manufacturer.
112
• The higher the content of noble metal, the less the likelihood of adverse effects on the metal
core should be taken to minimize the exposure times of metals to potentially corrosive
chemicals.
• Unglazed porcelain should not be exposed to any disinfectant and (porcelain firing/ glazing will
suffice), fixed metal prostheses can be sterilized with ethylene oxide or even by autoclaving if
desired.
• Any device that has been immersed in a disinfectant should be rinsed thoroughly before
delivery to the patient.
113
• Prostheses or appliances that have been worn by patients should be cleaned thoroughly before
disinfection by scrubbing with a brush and an antiseptic hand wash or by cleaning in an
ultrasonic unit.
• Dentures or other acrylic appliances that have been worn by patients and require repair should
be disinfected, after cleaning and before handling should be handled (i.e. with gloves) as
contaminated even after disinfection.
• The porous nature of acrylic makes such devices difficult to disinfect adequately.
114
• Robert J. Boylan et al used UV light with a wavelength of 254nm as a mode of sterilizing
complete dentures, partial dentures and a rubber base impression contaminated with fine known
species of microorganisms.
• The results showed that killing of microorganisms with greater than 98% within 15 seconds and
99% either 30 seconds and 100% in 2 minutes.
• They also concluded that UV light cannot be used as a sole means of disinfecting the
impressions because of shadowing effect that allows the survival of microorganisms unexposed
to UV light.
115
Disinfection of Dentures with Soft liners
116
Protective eye wear:
• It may be in the form of glasses and / or a facemask. It
should prevent trauma to the eye tissue from flying
droplets / aerosols.
• Cleaning involves an initial presoaking with detergent solution containing disinfectants to soften
organic debris and begin microbial kill. After cleaning the instruments should be dried.
• Surfaces like unit handles, light handle, light switch, chair controls, head rest knob, trolley
handle, trolley and 3-way syringes cannot be disconnected and sterilized and therefore need to
be treated with disinfectants covered with a protective barrier.
118
• However instruments which enter oral cavity and are connected to some of the equipment e.g.
air rotor and surgical handpiece, ultrasonic inserts / tips, airwater syringe tips and light cure
probes / tips should be disconnected, sterilized and rinsed.
• Disinfection of surfaces involves the cleaning of surfaces, after every patient and application of
a disinfectant chemical. These chemicals include alcohol (spirit), iodophor products, synthetic
phenols, glutaraldehyde, chlorines etc.
• The advantages of barriers include ease and speed of insertion, standard sizes and the protection
of equipment from damage by chemicals, blood and fluids.
119
• Spittoons should be flushed with water,
scrubbed and disinfected.
120
Dental Unit Waterlines: Disinfection and management
• The main risk to dental staff and patient health from DUWL
contamination comes from opportunistic and respiratory
pathogens such as Legionella, non-tuberculous mycobacteria
(NTM) and Pseudomonas.
• The DUWL should be flushed for 20–30 s between patients to reduce temporarily the microbial
count, as well as to clean the waterline of materials that may have entered from the patient’s
mouth. This includes handpieces, ultrasonic scalers and air/water syringes.
• All DUWLs should be fitted with non-retractable devices, to prevent suck-back (backflow/back-
siphon age) of material into the municipal water supply.
123
• Water from DUWL should never be used as an irrigant in procedures involving breaches of the
mucosa and bone exposure.
124
Laboratory Asepsis
• Dental practitioners regularly send clinical material to the laboratory: impression material,
dentures sent to the technology laboratory or pathological samples such as pus or biopsy
specimens referred to pathology laboratories.
• The dentist is obliged to deliver all such items in a manner that obviates infectious hazards,
whether during transport or within the laboratory.
• Blood and saliva must be carefully cleaned from the impressions and denture work by washing
under running water and disinfection, and, if appropriate, placed in plastic bags before transport
to the laboratory.
• Proprietary disinfectant soaking solutions are preferred to sprays for decontaminating the
microbes retained on impression surfaces.
125
• The dental laboratory itself should be regarded as a clean (not contaminated) area, and
appropriate protocols for disinfection of surfaces and material, as well as regular and timely
renewal of disinfectant solutions, should be established. Smoking and eating should be
prohibited.
• Biopsy specimens should be put in a sturdy container with a secure lid to prevent leakage during
transport. 126
• Care should be taken when collecting specimens to avoid contamination of the external surface
of the container.
127
Maintenance of Wooden handle spatulas, Blow-torches, Rubber bowls & Shade- guides
128
• Items such as shade guides should be cleaned and disinfected to avoid cross contamination.
• If iodophors are used on shade guides, they should be wiped with water or alcohol after the
exposure time to remove any residual.
129
Management of Infectious Patients
130
Transmission of Infectious Pathogens like HIV, HBV etc.
131
Modes of Occupational Exposure
• Patient to DHCP (Dental Health Care Personnel), including dentists, hygienists and assistants.
132
Prevention Strategies (Universal Protection Protocol)
2. Cubicle preparation
6. Double gloves
133
Barriers for Preventing Cross- Contamination of Infection
Gloves:
135
• Handling of sharp instruments and needles:
If a patient requires multiple injection over
time then the needle should be recapped
between each use to avoid needle stick
injury.
• Palm to palm
• Right palm over left dorsum and left palm over right dorsum
• Rotational rubbing of right thumb clasped over left and vice versa
138
Hand Washing Techniques
139
Frequently and less frequently missed areas during hand washing
140
141
Bio-medical Waste Segregation
142
143
144
145
Disposal Of Infected Clinical Waste
• All waste from HIV seropositive and AIDS patients must be treated as infected waste.
• Disposable plastic aprons and gloves must be worn when handling infected material.
• Wash hands.
147
Disposal of Contaminated Linen
• All linen from HIV seropositive and AIDS patients
must be treated as infected linen.
• The infected/contaminated linen should not be handled by laundry staff it is kept into the
washing machine with very high temperature 71°C for 25 minutes.
• After placing the linen in the appropriate bags remove the protective clothing and dispose off as
clinical waste.
149
Disposal, Disinfection & Sterilization Of Contaminated Equipment
150
Contaminated Instruments (Stainless steel & polypropylene instruments, bowels,
kidney dishes etc.)
• Clean the instruments with running water and dry.
• Place the instruments in surgical plate. Apply some amount of alcohol over the instruments and
burn it.
151
STERILIZATION OF IMPLANT ROOM/
OPERATION THEATRE
152
Fumigation of Operation Theatre/ Implant room
• To sterilize the operation theatre formaldehyde
gas (bactericidal & sporicidal, virucidal) is
widely employed as it is cheaper for sterilization
of huge areas like operation theatres.
2. Next the fumigant is released into the space to be fumigated; then, the space is held for a set
period while the fumigant gas percolates through the space and acts on and kills any
infestation in the product.
3. Next the space is ventilated so that the poisonous gases are allowed to escape from the space,
and render it safe for humans to enter.
154
Procedure of Fumigation
• Adequate care must be taken by wearing cap, mask, foot cover, spectacle.
• Formaldehyde is irritant to eye & nose; and it has been recognized as a potential carcinogen.
• So the fumigating employee must be provided with the personal protective equipment's.
156
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
157
Rai R, Anand V, Loushambam P. Disinfection Of Alginate Impression Materials Using Uv
Lights Coated With Candida Albicans. Global Journal For Research Analysis. 2018
Oct30;7(10).
• Rai et al conducted a study to evaluatethe efficacy of ultra-violet light in decreasing the colony
counts of Candida albicans after coating the irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with
Candida albicans colonies.
158
• Three different tubes were used in ultra-violet light unit corresponding to 8watts, 16watts, and
24watts.
• The times of exposure were 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 seconds. The results were tabulated and
statistically analysed.
• It was found that ultra-violet light exposure more efficiently decreases the colony counts of
Candida albicans on samples.
159
Sreekumar S, Varghese K, Abraham JP, Jaysa JJ. An in vitro evaluation of the
efficiency of various disinfection and sterilization methods to decontaminate
dental handpieces. J Dent Res Rev 2018;5:50-3.
• Sreekumar et al did a study to evaluate the efficiency of various disinfection and sterilization
methods to decontaminate dental handpieces.
• For the study sixty contaminated handpieces were selected and divided into four groups of 15
handpieces.
• They were then contaminated using a mixture of Streptococcus salivarius, Escherichia coli, and
Candida albicans.
160
• The handpieces were then subjected to manual scrubbing followed by bacteriological culture.
• The study revealed that moist autoclave is the best way to decontaminate the dental handpieces.
• Further, it was shown that proper cleaning of the instrument prior to autoclave, as recommended
by the American Dental Association’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is
required for 100% efficiency.
• Statistically significant presence of S. salivarius and E. coli was found in samples disinfected
with Decident™ and 70% isopropyl alcohol, respectively.
• The study revealed that moist autoclave, following the procedures recommended by the CDC,
still remains as the gold standard of sterilization of dental handpieces.
161
Farrugia C, Cassar G, Valdramidis V, Camilleri J. Effect Of Sterilization Techniques Prior
To Antimicrobial Testing On Physical Properties Of Dental Restorative Materials. Journal
Of Dentistry. 2015 Jun 1;43(6):703-14.
• Farrugia et al did a study to evaluate Effect Of Sterilization Techniques Prior To Antimicrobial
Testing On Physical Properties Of Dental Restorative Materials.
• The aim of this study was to investigate any changes to the microstructure and surface
properties of selected dental materials after sterilization carried out prior to subjecting them to
antimicrobial testing. Initial microbial contamination on the material, as well as other possible
sources of contamination were also assessed.
• The test materials were sterilized using alcohol, steam, ultraviolet light (UV) and ethylene oxide
and any changes to these materials were then assessed by SEM, microhardness testing and
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. 162
• Material microbial levels before treatments were assessed by plate counting technique and
turbidity tests. Possible contamination through dispensers was assessed by analyzing the
CFU/sample.
• Ethylene oxide affected the microstructure of the Chemfil, Ionoseal and Dyract, resulting in
flattening of the Si–O stretching vibrations and deposition of chlorine and calcium respectively
in Chemfil and Dyract.
• It was concluded that the different sterilization techniques affected the microstructure of the
materials under investigation. Samples of materials produced in sterile conditions could also be
contaminated with bacteria, either from the material itself or through the dispensing apparatus.
163
• Clinical significance: Results of antimicrobial studies cannot be extrapolated
clinically as the material sterilization treatment results in changes to material
chemistry and microstructure, which could in turn affect the materials’
antimicrobial activity.
164
Basso MF, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Pavarina AC, Machado AL, Jorge JH. Occlusal
pressure analysis of complete dentures after microwave disinfection: a clinical study.
Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017 Oct;26(7):606-10.
• Basso et al did a study to evaluat the effect of microwave disinfection protocols on the occlusal
pressure pattern of dentures after microwave disinfection.
• Occlusal contacts were recorded on five occasions: 30 days after denture insertion and before
first disinfection (baseline or control group); 1 week after disinfection; 2 weeks after
disinfection; 3 weeks after disinfection; 4 weeks after disinfection.
165
• Occlusal contacts were analyzed by T-Scan III. Intergroup analysis was performed using the
Mann-Whitney test and intragroup analysis using the Friedman test with significance of 5%.
• The results showed no significant difference between groups during the periods.
• The data on parameters loss of denture adaptation or complaints showed that patients used their
dentures regularly for eating and expressed comfort and satisfaction in all experimental periods.
• The evaluation of functional occlusion revealed that the distribution of the occlusal contacts
remained unaltered after disinfection.
• Microwave disinfection protocols as studied in this report did not influence occlusal contacts of
the complete dentures.
166
References
• Ananthanarayan And Panikers. Textbook Of Microbiology. 10th Edition. India: Universal Press;
2016.
• Lakshman Samarannayake. Essential Microbiology For Dentistry. 5th Edition. Poland: Elsevier;
2018.
• Baveja C.P. Textbook Of Microbiology. 11th Edition. India; ACP Publishers; 2011.
• Brandt R, Coffey J, Baker Ps. Infection Control In A Prosthodontic Residency Program. Journal
Of Prosthodontics. 2013 Mar;2(1):51-5.
• Bhat Vs, Shetty M, Shenoy K. Infection Control In The Prosthodontic Laboratory. The Journal
Of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2017 Apr 1;7(2):62.
• Sreekumar S, Varghese K, Abraham JP, Jaysa JJ. An in vitro evaluation of the efficiency of
various disinfection and sterilization methods to decontaminate dental handpieces. J Dent Res
Rev 2018;5:50-3.
• Boylan RJ, Goldstein GR, Schulman A. Evaluation of an ultraviolet disinfection unit. Journal of
Prosthetic Dentistry. 1987 Nov 1;58(5):650-4.
168
• Pavan S, Arioli Filho JN, Dos Santos PH, Nogueira SS, Batista AU. Effect of
disinfection treatments on the hardness of soft denture liner materials. Journal of
prosthodontics. 2007 Mar;16(2):101-6.
169
THANK YOU
170