0% found this document useful (0 votes)
99 views8 pages

Fish Digestion Rate Study: Catfish Analysis

The document describes a study that measured the digestion rate in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) by weighing gastric contents at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after feeding to calculate gastric emptying rates. The results showed varying gastric weights and emptying rates across experimental groups. Factors like fish size, metabolism rate, and food quality were found to influence digestion rates.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
99 views8 pages

Fish Digestion Rate Study: Catfish Analysis

The document describes a study that measured the digestion rate in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) by weighing gastric contents at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after feeding to calculate gastric emptying rates. The results showed varying gastric weights and emptying rates across experimental groups. Factors like fish size, metabolism rate, and food quality were found to influence digestion rates.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DIGESTION RATE ON FISH

Name : Anang Yanuar Ramadhan


Student ID : B1B015015
Entourage :I
Group :4
Assistant : Rosewitha Anggraeni Privieshanti H.

PRACTICAL REPORT OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY II

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE


JENDERAL SOEDIRMAN UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF BIOLOGY
PURWOKERTO
2020
I. INTRODUCTION

A. Background

Digestion rate is time that needed to break food from complex molecules to
simpler molecules (Juansang et al., 2012). Digestion breaks down flour and
protein or biopolymers into monomer units using enzymes (Qiao et al., 2016).
Digestion rate is generally correlated with the rate of fish metabolism. The longer
the time, the stomach contents will be reduced so that the body weight of the fish
is reduced. Gastric emptying time is also influenced by the food consumed by fish
(Diniarti & Astriana, 2019).
The factors that influence the rate of digestion are water temperature because
fish are poikiloterm. Digestion rate or rate of emptying the stomach is not only
influenced by the temperature of the water but also by the food consumed.
Differences in feed quality will cause differences in the constituent components,
and this difference will result in differences in the rate and ability of feed
digestion. Fish food is food that is specially made or produced to be easy and
available to eat. Fish food is very influential on the growth and survival of fish
bodies (Zidni et al., 2018).
Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) are used in this laboratory activity because
catfish have a true stomach so it is easy to observe. Besides that catfish are
classified as eaters of all (omnivorous). Catfish are able to eat all types of food
and are also classified as scavengers. It is naturally nocturnal and catfish it is able
to adapt. The other characteristic or behavior that stands out is when it encounters
a new atmosphere, for example a sudden change of atmosphere from a dark to a
bright place (Fujaya, 2002).

B. Purpose

The objectives of this laboratory activity are


1. The shape of empty gastric and gastric contains feed
2. Obtain a skill of isolating the fish gastric
3. Calculate the rate of gastric emptying
II. MATERIAL AND METHODS

A. Material

The materials that used in this practice are catfish, fish feed (in the form of
pellet).
The tools that used in this practice are analytical scale, aquarium, dissection
kit, and specimen tray.

B. Methods

1. Aquarium is prepared then filled with water as high as 25 cm.


2. Fish is spread in the aquarium.
3. Pellet is inserted into aquarium as much as 2,5 % from the fish weight, and
fish is let to consume the feed for 15-20 minutes.
4. Fish weight is weighted on analytical scale.
5. Fish is dissected to take out the gastric of fish, and do the weighting also.
The obtained gastric weight is stated as 0 minute after eating (Bx).
6. Step 4 and 5 is re-perform after 30 menit (By) and 60 menit (Bz).
III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A. Result

Table 3.1. The Result of Digestion Rate Observation on Catfish (Clarias


gariepinus)
X (0’) Y (30’) Z (60’)
Group
Bx (gr) Bx (%) By (gr) By (%) Bz (gr) Bz (%)
1 2,06 1,61 1,87 1,43 2,07 1,51
2 0,61 0,44 1,75 1,25 1,94 1,37
3 2,26 1,5 2,22 1,55 1,23 0.98
4 1,6 1,36 2,27 1,75 2,26 1,49
5 2,08 1,58 2,11 1,56 1,97 1,56

Calculation of Group 4
Bx 1,6
Bx (%) = x 100% = x 100% = 1,36 %
Bxt 117
By 2,27
By (%) = x 100% = x 100% = 1,75 %
Byt 129
Bz 2,26
Bz (%) = x 100% = x 100% = 1,49 %
Bzt 151

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2 Group 1
Group 2
1
Group 3
0.8 Group 4
Group 5
0.6

0.4

0.2

0
Bx% By% Bz%
Graphic 3.1 The Result of Digestion Rate Observation on Catfish (Clarias
gariepinus)
B. Discussion

Based on data obtained by group 4, Bx fish weight is obtained which is 117


gram, fish gastric weight is 1,6 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,36%. By
fish weight is 129 gram, fish gastric weight is 2,27 gram, and fish gastric weight
percentage is 1,75%. Bz fish weight is 151 gram, fish gastric weight is 2,26 gram,
and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,49%. Based on data obtained from group 1,
Bx fish gastric weight is 2,06 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,61%. By
fish gastric weight is 1,87 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,43%. Bz fish
gastric weight is 2,07 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,51%. Based on
data obtained from group 2, Bx fish gastric weight is 0,61 gram, and fish gastric
weight percentage is 0,44%. By fish gastric weight is 1,75 gram, and fish gastric
weight percentage is 1,25%. Bz fish gastric weight is 1,94 gram, and fish gastric
weight percentage is 1,37%.
Based on data obtained from group 3, Bx fish gastric weight is 2,26 gram,
and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,5%. By fish gastric weight is 2,22 gram, and
fish gastric weight percentage is 1,55%. Bz fish gastric weight is 1,23 gram, and fish
gastric weight percentage is 0,98%. Based on data obtained from group 5, Bx fish
gastric weight is 2,08 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,58%. By fish
gastric weight is 2,11 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,56%. Bz fish
gastric weight is 1,97 gram, and fish gastric weight percentage is 1,56%. An increase
and decrease in the rate of digestion is happened. This is likely to occur because each
group is given different catfish. The rate of digestion is also influenced by the food
consumed, because in the food consumed by fish there are many mineral contents
that will be absorbed by the intestines of fish through the digestive process that takes
place while the fish consume the food (Kimball, 1983).
Based on data obtained from group 4, Bx gram; Bx percentage; By gram; By
percentage; Bz gram and Bz percentage is different from another group because the
differences in gastric weight and fish weight. Digestion rate is generally correlated
with the metabolism rate on fish. Measuring the time during the laboratory activity
for 15 minutes and 30 minutes, so the results obtained during the laboratory activity
most likely do not constitute a digestion process due to the feed given during the
laboratory activity. Usually the more fish activity, it will require a lot of energy so
that the process of metabolism is high and requires food of a much better quality and
more in quantity. Some factors that influence the gastric weight include the size of
the organism that is vary because the less the organism, the less the organism eats
feed. Digestion rate reduction can also be caused by fish not constantly eating the
feed provided (Srichanun, 2012).
IV. CONCLUSION

Based on the result can be concluded that :

1. The fish, fish gastric weight, and fish gastric percentage on each group is
different.
2. Digestion rate on fish is correlated with metabolism rate on fish.

3. The digestion rate on Bx is 1,36%, on By is 1,75% and on Bz is 1,49%.


REFERENCES

Diniarti, N. and Astriana, B.H., 2019. Pengaruh Penambahan Cacing Sutra (Tubifex)
sebagai Kombinasi Pakan Buatan terhadap Efisiensi Pemanfaatan Pakan dan
Pertumbuhan Larva Ikan Lele Sangkuriang (Clarias gariepinus). Jurnal
Perikanan Unram, 9(2), pp. 160-171.
Fujaya, Y., 2002. Fisiologi Ikan. Makasar : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Nasional.
Juansang, J., Puttanlek, C., Rungsardthong, V., Puncha-arnon, S. & Uttapap, D.,
2012. Effect of gelatinisation on slowly digestible starch and resistant starch
of heat-moisture treated and chemically modified canna starches. Food
Chemistry, 131(2), pp. 500-507.
Kimball, J.W. 1983. Biology Fifth Edition.  London : Addison Wesley Publishing
Company Inc.
Qiao, D., Xie, F., Zhang, B., Zou, W., Zhao, S., Niu, M., Lv, R., Cheng, Q., Jiang, F.
& Zhu, J., 2017. A further understanding of the multi-scale supramolecular
structure and digestion rate of waxy starch. Food Hydrocolloids, 65, pp. 24-
34.
Srichanun, M., Tantikitti, C., Vatanakul, V. and Musikarune, P., 2012. Digestive
Enzyme Activity during Ontogenetic Development and Effect of Live Feed in
Green Catfish Larvae (Mystus nemurus Cuv. & Val). Songklanakarin Journal
of Science & Technology, 34(3), pp. 247-254.
Zidni, I., Eddy, A., Izza, M., Heti, H. & Ibnu, B. S., 2018. Laju Pengosongan
Lambung Ikan Mas (Cyprinuscarpio) dan Ikan Nila (Oreochromisniloticus).
Jurnal Perikanan dan Kelautan, 9(2), pp. 147-151.

You might also like