Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A handbook
of strategies
for group activity
in
meetings,
conferences,
workshops,
for
Churches,
community groups
etc.
by Leigh Wilson
INDEX
a) design
b) publicity
c) preparation
d) leadership
e) particular situations
a) forming groups
b) opening discussion of a topic
c) assessing new or existing ideas
d) discussing complex topics
e) concluding a session
4. Follow Up
assessing effectiveness
6. Appendix
a) Problem Solving
b) Planning Strategy
c) Learning Retention Rates
d) Leadership Styles
e) Six Thinking Hats
f) Useful Resources
1. Why “Ideas Flow”?
a) The Need
I've been to many meetings, conferences and workshop sessions, both as a leader and as a participant;
At these gatherings, I've been -
* bored ...because no-one will say anything;
* frustrated ...because the chairperson has made up his/her mind; and
* annoyed ...because a lot has been said, but we didn’t seem to get anywhere.
If that has been your experience, either as a leader or as a participant, then IDEAS FLOW is for you.
as a member of a group,
IDEAS FLOW
* will make it easier for you to have your say.
will help make meetings more interesting.
In business and industry, where efficiency and progress are of paramount importance, methods have been developed
which take full advantage of the ideas and skills of everyone, while making full use of limited time and other resources.
IDEAS FLOW is a handbook of methods which have proved useful in schools, churches, community and business
organisations.
b) The Belief
In any organisation, large or small – decisions are constantly being made.
They may be policy decisions, of great importance
or every-day decisions of how something will be implemented.
Often these decisions are made by the leader (Chairman, Manager, Principal) on the basis of their own considered
opinion, or after consultation with his/her chosen advisors.
These decisions affect people who must carry out what has been decided.
It follows that the more fully the members are involved in the decision-making process, the more enthusiastic
they will be at implementing these decisions.
So how do we -
involve them?
draw them out?
move them on?
Leaders may feel that their members are uninformed, or disinterested, so that they have little to contribute to the process
of decision-making.
And members may feel that the contributions are not wanted, or are not worth making.
c) Involving Members
However in many organisations, there are members who are interested and wish to be involved in the decisions which in
turn shape them.
Everyone - is educated
is informed
has an opinion
They may have participated in a situation similar to one we may be contemplating, and so they can suggest
possibilities and pitfalls we haven’t thought of.
Those who are older, or more experienced, have a larger fund of ideas from which to draw,
while those who are younger or less experienced often contribute fresh, original thoughts to the subject under
discussion.
They have
ideas,
opinions,
experiences,
reactions
which they have gained from the unique experience of life.
Many are experts on one facet of knowledge, not so much by training as by personal interest, developed through -
their hobby
or pastime,
their reading
or research
Usually they only share this information and understanding with other enthusiasts.
Already they are expressing their individual thoughts in the choice they make of their -
occupation
interests
appearance
home and possessions
decor of rooms, home or garden
gift giving
Those who are responsible for decision-making may easily overlook the value of the contribution which ordinary members
can make.
For the sake of speed, or efficiency, or to preserve the status quo, decisions may be made on the basis of a limited
range of opinions and information.
To ignore or under-rate the contribution of ordinary members is to limit the effectiveness of the decision and its
implementation.
Many organisations do invite discussion of topics and decisions by their members. When this is done in open meetings,
the tendency is for only some members to contribute, while many remain silent.
Usually though, informal discussion takes place between members after the meeting. New insights, pressing questions,
etc. are lost, because they were not brought into the formal discussion process.
The assumption is that those who contribute their thoughts are interested, and those who do not are disinterested.
This is an over-simplification.
The most likely to contribute to any discussion are -
The more experienced,
the more dominant,
the more persistent,
the more vocal,
the more prepared,
those who can think quickly,
those who can express themselves best,
those who catch the leaders eye (or attention),
those who are alert.
If it is a serious Intention to encourage everyone to take part in decision-making: settings are needed which will minimise
all obstacles, and encourage all members to participate.
d) The answer
The simplest and most effective method is to divide the gathering into small groups.
This may be done quite simply, whatever the setting.
Advantages
Although small groups take more time, they are more productive, because -
they lead to valid decisions, not spontaneous superficial decisions.
they encourage participation, causing members to feel that their opinions matter.
they allow greater opportunity to clarify subject-matter, and to interpret it to the particular needs,
situations, and experiences of the members of that group.
They help to humanise and personalise the organisation
they create a greater interest
they involve people more, by honouring their knowledge, understanding and contribution.
Disadvantages
small groups take longer to organise
people may share inaccurate or incomplete information
quick thinkers and incessant talkers may dominate the discussion
2. Planning and Preparing for a Meeting or Conference
a) Design
Determine the purpose of the meeting, taking into account the relevance of the occasion for those taking part
a) Is it -
- to gather all existing Ideas together
- to gain as many new ideas as possible
- to assess the value of a range of new, or existing ideas
- to develop a working plan;
- to ascertain support for an established programme.
b) Is there-
- a problem to be solved
- a series of challenges to be considered
- an issue to be discussed
- a topic to be studied
b) Publicity
Prepare advance information for all participants by means of-
a) Simple Announcement, spoken or written;
b) A statement of issues, or problems;
c) A summary of various viewpoints
d) A paragraph, diagram, etc. which describes the problem or issue;
e) an article, extract, or comment which highlights the issue, or aspects of it.
f) A "think board" onto which interested folk may add their comments
g) An explanation of what uses will be made of the information gained
(this is essential to ensure the whole-hearted participation of members)
h) SMS, Facebook or Twitter
c) Preparation
I) Setting Up
Determine the facilities which are available, or which will be required-
a) Size of room, or rooms;
b) Availability of room dividers, or extra rooms
c) Length of session, or sessions;
d) Seating arrangements;
e) wall-boards, or wall space for notices
f) Screen, or light coloured wall
g) Data Projector.
For general discussion of a topic, or discussion towards a needed solution, or consensus of opinion ,
then a prepared leader is necessary.
Take into account any factors which may affect the participation of the members -
a) Will members know each other?
b) Will members come to the session feeling fresh or weary?
c) Will the subject matter generate strong emotional reactions?
e) Particular situations
a) When members of the groups haven’t met before -
Encourage all members to form pairs or foursomes with others whom they don’t know, or don’t know very well
(They may do this by moving around the room or by turning to the person behind or beside them)
Allow 2 - 3 minutes for each person to find out something about each other -
* name
occupation
family
interests
or
* how far they have travelled to the session
* something interesting that has happened to them today
* how they feel right now
Then members of the foursome or pair are to introduce each other (not themselves) to another pair or foursome;
or if the group is not too large, have each member introduce the person next to them to the whole group.
afraid anxious
calm confident
delighted embarrassed
enthusiastic frustrated
hesitant impatient
inferior insecure
nervous repulsed
sensitive suspicious
sympathetic tense
tentative trusting
3. Putting it Into Action
a) Forming Groups
I) ad-hoc - Buzz Groups
Groups may be formed where people are.
With moveable seating, 3 - 6 people may move their seats closer together.
With fixed seating, people may simply lean forward or back to be closer to the others.
When time and circumstances permit, chairs may be arranged around tables or in circles,
or alternate benches or seats may be reversed to form pairs of seats opposite each other.
These arrangements are preferable, as they permit all participants in the group to see each other.
Have everyone define in a sentence the subject / problem / issue in their own words.
Then people gather in 4's or 6's and share their definitions.
Each group to choose the best/clearest/ freshest definition to share with whole group.
Have everyone list all the questions they have about the particular issue
or,
have them list all things they need to know before discussion commences.
Then people gather in groups of 4 - 6 to compile their questions
arrange for leader, resource person, or expert to provide this basic information before further discussion follows
v) Wall Sheets
Each topic, or question, is written on a separate sheet.
Allow a few minutes for people to read them.
Allow 10 - I5 minutes for people to add their comments or questions to the sheets.
Have each group take one sheet and summarise what is known
and what needs to be resolved, about the topic.
Each group may then prepare a revised wall sheet.
Display wall sheets for people to read during the tea break
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
according to appropriate criteria determined before hand by the leader i.e.:
suitability
appeal
practicability.
ii) My response
at the end of a presentation, or printed report, have folk indicate -
e) Concluding a Session
I) SMS
Have each group summarise their discussions in the form of an SMS which may be read to the whole meeting or
displayed on a wall-board
ii) Twitter
iii) I urge
Have each group prepare a statement beginning “I urge..." addressed to the Chairman, Manager, Principal,
in which they set out practical proposals, in point form.
iv) Posters
Have each group compile the main ideas discussed listed in point form on a wall sheet or illustrated in sketch
form, or flow chart.
v) Summing up-
a) Chairman to summarise reactions of members and indicate the appropriate action that will follow
4. Follow Up
or
The session was –
most helpful
of little value
of no value
because _________________________________
I believe in the priesthood of all believers - everyone has an experience of life, of God, of church, and religion. God
shows himself differently to each person. Do leaders see themselves as authorities or guides? Look at the Biblical
examples of leaders interacting with the people -
b) My experience
Our Churches are comprised mainly of middle class well-educated folk, many of whom are able to think clearly
and logically. However, there are those who don't fit this description. Many of these people seem to feel inferior,
as though their experience doesn't count and isn't valued. The lack of opportunity for involvement feeds this
feeling.
Having spent half of my Christian experience in the pulpit and the other half in the pews, I have had ample
opportunity to reflect on why this is so. As I sat in church one Sunday and looked around, I saw 80 to 100
worshippers of mixed ages, many of whom had been Christians for many years. Having an interest in maths, I
calculated the amount of accumulated biblical wisdom in the minds of those worshippers.
How much of that wisdom stayed there, and how much was shared with other people?
And what opportunity is there in normal church life for this accumulated wisdom to be tested, clarified or
amended?
I have often heard gems of wisdom from the least expected sources, both in talking with children and in small
groups, when people are given the opportunity to share their thoughts and experiences.
How much do people take in when they listen? It is estimated that people take in 5 to 20% of what they hear and
a great deal more when their thinking is stimulated by visual means or actually participating in their learning.
(See “Learning Retention Rates”)
How do people absorb information? When they already have a fairly well developed system of knowledge and
beliefs, new understanding and new truths must be assimilated into what they already know. That's why Jesus
used stories and examples from everyday life, connecting eternal truths with everyday situations.
My Contention is that it is well worth the extra time to set up processes that involve people and engage their
minds, so that they feel as though they want to be involved in learning.We will be well rewarded when we develop
methods to encourage the participation of people in their learning.ow to use Ideas Flow in the life of the Church-
i) In worship.
When introducing a new theme, use “Values Voting” to ascertain the level of agreement and understanding of
the members.rather than assuming a certain level of agreement and understanding on their part.
Proclamation assumes effective communication in our world where communication has become a major
industry, yet we maintain the “talk–listen” approach as a major form of communication.
Many voices are competing for people's attention–how well do we capture and hold the attention of our
members? And what do we do to generate a deeper interest in the message?
Various forms of involvement keep people alert, awake, and eager to to learn and contribute.
To encourage folk to pray, use “Buzz Groups”
ii) In Bible study
In smaller settings such as Small Groups, we have many opportunities to open up fresh possibilities of
understanding the Scriptures.
Many of the strategies described in “Putting it into Action” are suitable for use on Small Groups.
Try “Twenty Questions” when looking at a narrative Bible Passage, and be amazed at how much insight comes
to the surface!
ask again –
Specific
Negative factors
c) our resources -
2. CONSIDER
3. PLAN OF ACTION
a) Starting point
c) sequence of events
d) follow-up required
4. EVALUATION
2% through Touch
4% through Smell
the "preacher" - imparts a message, or enthusiasm for an idea, but regards people as things.
the "teacher" - interested to develop the possibilities of the member full of purpose, but impatient
toward unwilling ones.
the "companion" - allowing the member to make their own world, weak in purpose, often exploited,
or not really taken seriously.
The leader must be capable of each of these roles at the right time.
the smooth operator - charming on the outside - insincere praise fools nobody.
(good leadership calls for sincere participation)
the stuffed shirt - knows everything - being formal and solemn won't attract people.
(a good leader is a warm friend)
the big wheel - likes to be in power and pull the strings – gets only half-hearted response or resistance.
(a good leader tries to help people be what they would like to be)
father knows best - demands obedience, discusses nothing, explains nothing, scalds them,
pats them on the head.
makes members helpless, they want to be treated as individuals with high hopes and
dignity.
* helps members feel capable of self-discipline and so develops socially responsible persons.
* sets the tone by paying attention to the contributions of others, perhaps saying,
"Lets see if I understand what you mean...."
i) in Print
ii) on-line
http://tilz.tearfund.org/Publications/Footsteps+51-60/Footsteps+60/
includes the following useful articles -
Facilitation Skills
We are sharing much of the learning Tear Fund has gained about facilitation skills.
Training and support in facilitation skills helps people gain confidence
a) Skills Checklist
Ask yourself these questions each time you lead a small group discussion.
It will help you to assess the development of your skills in facilitation.
b) Useful Energisers
During meetings, workshops or training sessions there may be times when
energy levels fall and people’s attention wanders
c) Using Role Play to Learn Facilitation Skills
c) people are naturally good at facilitation. However, most of us have to work hard
to become good faclitators.
http://www.impactalliance.org/
- offers these useful articles -
b) 100 Ways to Energise Groups: Games to use in workshops, meetings and the
community
This is a compilation of energisers, icebreakers and games that can be used by anyone working
with groups of people, whether in a workshop, meeting or community setting.
Leigh Wilson is a retired Baptist Minister, who has led an interesting and varied life.
He grew up in Melbourne, and studied as a Quantity Surveyor, before being called
into Christian ministry.
He ministered in country Victoria to small congregations, before becoming
a School Chaplain in Shepparton.
He later moved to South Australia, ministering to a mixed congregation in Woomera,
and then became a Chaplain in Industry, in Port Augusta, Adelaide and then Mount
Gambier. During this time he also had responsibility for Staff Development and Training.
He retired from active ministry in 2000, and has kept himself busy with Church and
community activities in his retirement. He enjoys photography,writing and travel.