Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grila de Lectura A Unui Articol de Studiu Terapeutic Toni
Grila de Lectura A Unui Articol de Studiu Terapeutic Toni
2. Metodologia studiului :
- studiu prospectiv:NU
- studiu retrospectiv:NU
"Patients were divided into control group (n=50) and observation group (n=60)
according to different surgical methods. Patients in control group were subjected
to traditional open discectomy, while patients in observation group were treated
with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy."
"One hundred and ten patients with lumbar disc herniation were selected in The
Affiliated People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May 2015 to
May 2016."
1/3
2.3. Populatia studiului corespunde populatiei tratate in mod
obisnuit: DA
“Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
Measurement data were expressed as mean ± SD, and processed using t-test.
Comparisons with groups were performed by t-test. P<0.05 was considered to
indicate a statistically significant difference."
“Results of this study showed that blood loss, incision size and time of bed rest
were better in observation group than in the control group. Compared with
preoperative levels, ODI and VAS scores of the two groups were significantly
decreased, but the decreases in observation group was lower than those in
control group. This finding is consistent with the results of Mroz et al (11),
indicating that treatment of lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous
endoscopic lumbar discectomy can avoid large surgical trauma, reduce blood
2/3
loss, promote postoperative recovery, shorten hospitalization and reduce
economic burden of patients' families. ”
4. Aplicabilitatea clinică
“This study is still limited by the environment, small sample size and time of
clinical observation.Further studies are still needed to investigate the long-term
effects of this method.”
Comentarii: Din punct de vedere metodologic, acest studiu a fost realizat într-
un mod corect, întrucât s-a respectat structura: introducere, obiective, metode,
rezultate, discuţii, concluzii. Obiectivul studiului a fost clar structurat şi susţine
scopul studiului. Populaţia analizată a fost selectată corect, esantionul fiind unul
reprezentativ pentru studiu.
Pacienții selectați după anumite criterii au fost împarțiți în două grupe, un grup
de observare și un grup de control, tehnica operatorie fiind diferită. Postoperator,
grupurile au fost comparate cu ajutorul mai multor scoruri : ODI,VAS,
comparație între factorii serici inflamatorii si factorii serici oxidativi. Rezultatele
au fost bine structurate și interpretate, astfel s-a putut enunța o concluzie clară
asupra acestora.
Aşadar, consider ca acest studiu este valid şi prezintă valabilitate.
Bejușcă-Vieriu Toni
MG,Seria E.grupa 57,An III
3/3