Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric
Phase 1 - Review Presentation and contents of the course

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Faculty of Basic Sciences, Technology and

Academic Unit Engineering
Academic Level Specialization
Academic Field Disciplinary training
Course Name Supply Chain Management and Logistics
Course Code 228001
Course Type Theoretical Can be yes ☒ No ☐
enabled
Number of Credits 3

2. Description of the activity

Number
Type of the
Individual ☒ Collaborative ☐ of 2
activity:
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☒ ☐ Final ☐
evaluation: Intermediate:
Evaluative score of the Delivery Environment of the
activity: 25 activity: Monitoring and evaluation
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
01/February/2020 14/February/2020
Competence to develop:
The student:
Identify the structure and key concepts on which the course is
developed.
Topics to develop:
Unit 1. Initial Activity
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop
Phase 1 Review presentation and contents of the course
Activities to develop
Individuals activities:
• Comprehensive content review in order to acquire knowledge
about the basic concepts of the course, as well as its structure.
Each student must:
• Enter the course, update your profile and your photograph as well
as perform the recognition in each of the virtual environments available
in the course; read its description, know its purpose and understand its
usefulness.
• Enter the general forum of the course and make your personal
presentation.
• See and listen to the presentation of the course.
• Read carefully the guide and evaluation rubric of Phase 1.
• Make a “Time Line” individually that allows identify the most
representative milestones related to logistics and Supply Chain
Management evolution (to make the time line they can use different
software tools of free access, that can be found on the web).
• Feedback or comment on the Time Line made and published in
the collaborative forum by their groupmates.
Environment of collaborative work: Interaction and
socialization –
Forum Unit 1. Phase 1. Presentation and contents of the
course review.
Each student shares their Time Line and makes
Environment comments on the Time Lines of the members of the
for the group
development
Environment evaluation and monitoring: Delivery of
final product
Each student must publish in this environment their
Time Line, according to the dates established in this
guide.
Individual:
A report That contains:
• Cover page
• Introduction
Products to • Objectives of the report (general and specifics)
deliver by • Content (Time Line, image, or depending on the
student tool used, they can place on the report the access link
to view the Time Line)
• Conclusions (minimum two)
• Bibliography (APA) Standards. Minimum three.
Presentation specifications
 The document to be delivered must be in PDF format.
Font: Times New Roman
Font Size: 12
Space between lines: 1.5
Margins: left, right top and bottom 2.56cm
Font Titles: Size 12 and centered

File Name: First name_surname_ groupnumber.

Example: Juan_Perz_228001_12

The size of the file must not exceed 10Mb (when the
size is exceeded, the file can be published in Drive or
Dropbox, and they can upload a word document with a
cover and in the next page the access line to the
Timeline).

Delivery of work:
The file must be placed in the Evaluation and
monitoring environment in the link Phase 1.
Presentation and contents of the course review, before
the due time according to the indicated in the course
agenda.

The presentation that is not uploaded on the date and

space indicated will not be scored.

Student who does not participate in the forum with

significant contribution will have a zero “0” score.

General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of In collaborative groups, each student will take up a

activities for role, he/she will present a thematic and will discuss
the with his/her partners the comprehension and
development identification of the problem as a response in the
of moment of planning.
collaborative
work Based on this, students will design a strategy and
arrange elements needed for the construction of the
final product.

Equally, they will arrange a synchronic encounter

through a web conference to run each activity.

• The product of this moment will be selected and

accepted by the group leader, also the roles that
might be needed. Moreover, sharing the strategy to
be used about the development of suggested work,
this is to create participation, assertive and efficient
discussion by everyone of the participants in the
corresponding collaborative forum to allow the
construction of each one of the proposed products.

While elaborating the strategy and individual and group

activities of the learning process, the student will take
up a role in the collaborative group formed by five
members. Among the roles to be selected by the
collaborative group, the following are recommended:

Moderator or leader: Who organizes and observes

that proposed assignments are kept. He or she is
Roles to
responsible for handing in the product of the team.
perform by
Collaborator: who is in charge of organizing the
the student
contributions in the document to be handed. He or she
in the
revises redaction and orthography.
collaborative
Evaluator: verifies that the final paper meets the
group
criteria established by the rubric. The evaluator must
inform the group about any corrections or adjustments
regarding the quality of the document.
Idea man: checks time, contributes with ideas and
asks questions to motivate others to do it as well.
Investigator: leads consultation of bibliographic
material and proposals of investigation.

Roles and Dear students, through this information I present to

responsibilit you the roles that each one of you must assume with
y for the respect to each activity to develop in units 1 and 2
delivery of present in forums of collaborative work respectively.
products by Allow me to remind you that it is needed each student
students takes on a role in a way that the collaborative work
does not bring inconvenient to the group.
Collector: Articulate the contributions of all the
participants of the collaborative group in order to
consolidate the final paper; including only those who
took part of the whole process.
Reviewer: verifies that the final paper and process
meet all the requirements established by the teacher.
Evaluator: verifies that the final paper meets the
criteria established by the rubric. The evaluator must
inform the group about any corrections or adjustments
regarding the quality of the document
Deliveries: Alerts about delivery times of the products
and sends the document during stablished times, using
destined resources for the delivery and informing
others about the delivery being complete.
The APA style for written works and documents of
investigation: these norms are a combination of
standards created by the American Psychological
Association to unified the way of presenting written
Use of Works in an international level. They are specially
references designed for graduation projects or any other type of
investigation documents. See APA style in environment
of management.

http://normasapa.com/
In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article
99, the mistakes that infringe upon the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) “To
plagiarize is to present as your own work the whole or
Plagiarism
part of a writing, report, task or document of invention
policy
performed by another person. It also implies the use of
cites or lack of references, or includes cites where there
is no coincidence between them and the reference” and
paragraph f)”To reproduce, or copy for profit,
educational resources or results of research products,
 which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University”.

The academic punishments that the student will face

are:
a) In case of academic fraud proved in the academic
work or evaluation, the score achieved will be zero
(0.0) without leading to disciplinary measures.
b) In case of plagiarism proved in the academic
work of any nature, the score achieved will be zero
(0.0), without leading to disciplinary measures.

To know how the documents must be cited, check the

following document:
Centro de Escritura Javeriano ( ) Normas APA. Sexta
edición. Taken from
http://centrodeescritura.javerianacali.edu.co/index.ph
p?option=com_content&view=article&id=138:normas-
apa&catid=45:referencias-bibliograficas&Itemid=

4. Evaluation rubric

Evaluation rubric

Activity Individual Collaborativ

☒ ☐
type: Activity e Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☒ Intermediat ☐ Final ☐
evaluation e:
Assessed Performance levels of the individual activity Scor
Aspects High score Media score Low score e
The overall
appearance of The timeline The timeline
the timeline is is partially is difficult to
pleasant and readable read 5
Readability
easy to read
(up to 5 (up to 3 (up to 2
points) points) points)
 The timeline
contains The
The timeline It contains at
timeline
contains at least least 5
contains at
10 coherent coherent dates
least 8
Content, dates and and images
coherent dates
Milestones images and has and has been
and images 10
and been included included for
and has been
Resources for all some
included for
Milestones Milestones
some
Milestones
(up to 10 (up to 5 (up to 2
points) points) points)
The report
The report The report
contains only
contains the six does not
four (4) of the
(6) points contain the
points
requested, and points
requested, and
Presentatio its presentation requested, and
its presentation 5
n of the is excellent and its presentation
is good but it
Report without spelling is poor and has
has spelling
mistakes spelling errors
errors
(up to 5 (up to 3 (up to 1
points) points) points)
Although it
The handling
presents
of appointments
references,
and references No citations
these are not
Bibliograph is satisfactory or references
articulated 5
ic according to
properly with
references APA
the work
(up to 5 (up to 3 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 25