Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
[PARTIAL NOTES FROM THE PRIOR MEETING]
Committee review of the proposed actions listed above:
1. Coal tar plume: Yes, we have to do this.
2. TCE plume: Yes.
3. Sandusky Cabinets: Yes.
4. Keller PCBs and asbestos: Dan Kaman said to move this down in priority until we get a
developer.
5. Warren park corridor: Yes.
6. Way station near tennis courts: Sharon Johnson thinks it’s a good spot, but it should
not be anything permanent. Wes Poole thinks we should discuss it.
7. DC Filter assessments: Yes.
8. DC Filter remedial plan: Yes.
9. DC Filter remedial support: Should the City participate in the RLF program? Mark
Harrington thinks it’s a no‐brainer.
10‐13. There were no objections to the rest of the points.
15
16
[PARTIAL NOTES FROM THE PRIOR MEETING]
This is the brownfield plan that this Brownfield Committee made previously. As noted, the
three highlighted activities were built into the City’s $110,000 grant extension request.
17
18
19
[PARTIAL NOTES FROM THE PRIOR MEETING]
Bob Haag noted that we should have plans and then seek grants to go with them, rather
than the other way around. The Brownfield Committee can amend the planned activities
on the list above.
For the TCE plume, we are suggesting that the City buy a $50,000 cleanup system and
operate it with City staff. The concept is to seek local funding to buy the system.
For Sandusky Cabinets, the plan has been to pursue the Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund
(CORF).
PCBs and asbestos in the Keller building were to be cleaned up with money sought from
the Ohio Department of Development (ODOD).
The park‐linking corridor concept development starts with this Brownfield Committee, so it
does not initially need money.
DC Filter might be done with future assessment grants and the RLF.
20
[PARTIAL NOTES FROM THE PRIOR MEETING]
Committee review of the proposed actions listed above:
1. Coal tar plume: Yes, we have to do this.
2. TCE plume: Yes.
3. Sandusky Cabinets: Yes.
4. Keller PCBs and asbestos: Dan Kaman said to move this down in priority until we get a
developer.
5. Warren park corridor: Yes.
6. Way station near tennis courts: Sharon Johnson thinks it’s a good spot, but it should
not be anything permanent. Wes Poole thinks we should discuss it.
7. DC Filter assessments: Yes.
8. DC Filter remedial plan: Yes.
9. DC Filter remedial support: Should the City participate in the RLF program? Mark
Harrington thinks it’s a no‐brainer.
10‐13. There were no objections to the rest of the points.
21