Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANEWEXTERNALAPPROACHTOTHE
PTERYGOMAXILLARY FOSSA AND
PARAPHARYNGEALSPACE
E. L. Attia, MD, FRCS(C),
K.C. Bentley, DDS, MDCM, FICD, FACD,
T. Head, DDS, FRCS(C), and
D. Mulder, MD, MSc, FRCS(C)
CASE REPORT From the Department of Otolaryngology (Dr Attia), the Department o i
Oral Surgery and Dentistry (Drs. Bentley and Head), and the Department
The initial evaluation at Montreal General Hos- of Surgery (Dr. Mulder), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
pital of a 16-year-old boy revealed a history of Address reprint requests to Dr. Attia at Montreal General Hospital, 1650
recurrent epistaxes, a sensation of fullness in the Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4.
face and throat, and difficulty breathing through Accepted for publication March 3, 1983.
the nose. These symptoms had first been noted 4 0148-6403/0604/0884 $04.0010
years earlier, and at that time a nasal lesion, 1984 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
884 A New External Approach HEAD & NECK SURGERY MariApr 1984
FIGURE 2. A computed tomographic scan, basal view, shows
extensive tumor in the pterygopalatine and parapharyngeal
FIGURE 1. Displacement of the palate and uvula by the mass. spaces.
riorly into the maxillary sinus and the nasal 2) to gain adequate exposure and direct access to
fossa, and medially across the midline of the the carotid artery system,
nasopharynx. 3) to preserve mandibular function, dental occlu-
Angiography showed extensive vasculariza- sion, and the vitality of the teeth,
tion of the tumor, mainly from the left external 4) to avoid injury to the facial nerve,
carotid artery system, but with one vessel from 5 ) to preserve sensation over the distribution of
the left internal carotid artery system feeding the the fifth cranial nerve, and
intracranial portion of the tumor (Fig. 3). 6) to achieve acceptable cosmetic results.
It was apparent from the size, location, and
vascularity of the tumor that the conventional ap- Surgical Procedure. Incision (Fig. 4). A curvilinear
proach to the pterygomaxillary fossa would be in- incision was developed from the mastoid process
adequate for complete resection. A multidiscipli- to the midline of the neck, at the level of the hyoid
nary team discussed the problem and decided on bone, about 2 inches below the angle of the man-
the external approach described in this article. dible. From there it was extended anteriorly in
The technique had been perfected by trial on the midline to the level of the mandible, curved
cadavers prior to its clinical use. laterally around the contour of the chin and back
Under controlled hypotensive anesthesia, the to the midline of the lower lip, and then extended
procedure was successfully used to resect the upwards t o transect the lip in the midline.
tumor after preparation by preoperative emboli- Exposure of the carotid artery (Fig. 5 ) . The
zation, operative ligation, and transection of the carotid sheath was identified and split open by
external carotid artery on the left side. The post- dissecting between the sternocleidomastoid mus-
operative course was uneventful. The patient re- cle and the superior portion of the strap muscles
covered with no sensory or motor deficits, and his of the larynx. The carotid artery was exposed at
mandibular function was normal. He has re- its bifurcation, and the internal carotid artery
mained free of recurrence for the 12 months of was traced superiorly to the base of the skull.
follow-up that have elapsed. This was accomplished by dissecting the parotid
In designing this new approach the objectives fascia away from the mastoid tip, as well as the
were: upper portion of the fascia enveloping the ster-
1) to gain adequate exposure and direct access to nomastoid muscle, which was reflected ante-
the pterygomaxillary fossa and the parapha- riorly. The posterior belly of the digastric was
ryngeal space in order to enucleate the tumor, identified and dissected to its insertion into the
\ i
FIGURE 4. The incision splits the lip and curves around the
contour of the chin to the midline in the submental area. It FIGURE 5. The common carotid artery is exposed as is the
extends as a curvilinear transverse neck incision from mid- internal carotid as far as the base of the skull. The external
line to mastoid. carotid artery is transected and ligated.
A New External Approach HEAD & NECK SURGERY MariApr 1984 887
FIGURE 8. (A) Upward reflection of the mandible gives excellent exposure of the pterygomaxillary and parapharyngeal spaces.
The pterygoid muscles are separated to remove the tumor. (B) lntraoperative view shows exposure of the pterygomaxillary and
parapharyngeal spaces. The pterygoid muscles are wrapped around the tumor.
where it attached to the mandible, and the con- The lip was closed in layers. The pterygomas-
tents of the floor of the mouth. The horizontal seteric sling was closed, and the inferior margin
osteotomy of the ascending ramus was then per- of the detached periosteum on the medial aspect
formed through an intraoral approach. From an of the body of the mandible was repositioned and
extraoral approach the remaining attached peri- sutured to the attached periosteum on the inferior
osteum, medial pterygoid muscle, and spheno- border of the mandible. The neck was then closed
mandibular ligament were detached from the me- in layers (Fig. 11).
dial aspect of the ascending ramus. Care was
taken to preserve the neurovascular bundle en-
F O I I O W . ~ ~ .The patient was examined 1year after
tering the mandibular foramen in order not to
the operation, and the surgical scar showed good
create a sensory deficit over the distribution of healing with some keloid formation (Fig. 12). The
the inferior dental and mental nerves.
panorex view showed good bone healing (Fig. 13).
The osteotomized mandible was then reflected
Intraoral examination showed good occlusion and
superiorly to provide access to the lateral pha-
ryngeal region (Fig. 8). After removing the tumor
a normal palate.
(Fig. 9),the mandible was returned to its original
position. Preformed Winter’s arch bars were at- DISCUSSION
tached to the maxillary and mandibular teeth by Tumors of the pterygomaxillary fossa and upper
means of 26-gauge stainless steel wires. A 26- parapharyngeal space present serious problems
gauge stainless steel wire was placed between the in terms of surgical ac~essibility.l-~
proximal and distal fragments of the horizontal The transantral a p p r o a ~ hgives
~ , ~ limited ac-
osteotomy in the ramus at the anterior border cess to the pterygomaxillary fossa, whereas the
and, after closure of the intraoral incision with 4- transpalatine approach7 exposes the nasopharynx
0 Dexon in interrupted fashion, the teeth were but gives very limited access to both the ptery-
placed into a preformed acrylic splint. Intermaxil- gomaxillary and parapharyngeal spaces. A com-
lary fixation was achieved with 24-gauge bination of the transpalatine and transantral ap-
stainless steel wires between the arch bars. A proaches has been advocated for more extensive
24-gauge stainless steel wire was then placed di~ease.~
interosseously at the inferior border of the ante- For extensive disease, the multidisciplinary
rior osteotomy site (Fig. 10). approach has always been a d v o ~ a t e d .However,
~,~
888 A New External Approach HEAD & NECK SURGERY MariApr 1984
i
FIGURE 13. Panorex view shows good bone healing 1 year after the operation.
890 A New External Approach HEAD & NECK SURGERY MariApr 1984
REFERENCES
tems. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, vol I, 1971, pp 402-403.
1 . Conley J J , Clairmont AA: Tumors of the parapharyngeal 6 . Longren RH: Surgery of the pterygomaxillary fossa. Arch
space. South Med J 71:543-550,1978. Otolaryngol 94:516-524, 1971.
2. McCabe BF, Bardach J, Herman G P An alternative ap- 7 . Cocke EW Jr: Transpalatine surgical approach to the
proach to the pterygopalatine fossa by removing the mandi- nasopharynx and the posterior nasal cavity. A m J Surg
ble and immediately replacing it. Otolaryngology 86:725- 108:517-524,1964.
728, 1978. 8. Heeneman H, Maran AGD: Parapharyngeal space tumours.
3. Acuna Rp: Juvenile nasopharyngeal fibroma. Ann Otol Clin Otolaryngol457-66, 1979.
Rhino1 Laryngol90:420-422,1981. 9 . Longacre JJ, Mayfield FH, Lotspeich ES, Kahl JB, Wood
4 . Biller HF, Shugar JMA, Krespi Y P A new technique for RW, Munick LH, Chunkamrai D: Combined transoral,
wide-field exposure of the base of the skull. Arch Otolaryn- transcervical and transosseous approach t o tumours of the
go1 107:698-702, 1981. nasopharynx and pharyngeal region. A m J Surg 110:644-
5 . Montgomery WW: Surgery of the Upper Respiratory Sys- 648,1965.
A New External Approach HEAD & NECK SURGERY MariApr 1984 891