Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
7.SP.1 Understand that statistics can be used to gain information about a population by
examining a sample of the population.
population are valid only if the sample is representative of that population. Develop an informal
understanding of bias.
7.SP.2 Broaden statistical reasoning by using the GAISE model: a. Formulate Questions:
Recognize and formulate a statistical
question as one that anticipates variability and can be answered with quantitative data. For
example, “How do the heights of seventh graders compare to the heights of eighth graders?”
(GAISE Model, step 1)
b. Collect Data: Design and use a plan to collect appropriate data to answer a statistical question.
(GAISE Model, step 2)
c. Analyze Data: Select appropriate graphical methods and numerical measures to analyze data
by displaying variability within a group, comparing individual to individual, and comparing
individual to group. (GAISE Model, step 3)
d. Interpret Results: Draw logical conclusions and make generalizations from the data based on
the original question. (GAISE Model, step 4)
a. Summarize quantitative data sets in relation to their context by using mean absolute
deviationG (MAD), interpreting mean as a balance point.
b. Informally assess the degree of visual overlap of two numerical data distributions with
roughly equal variabilities, measuring the difference between the centers by expressing it as a
multiple of a measure of variability. For example, the mean height of players on the basketball
team is 10 cm greater than the mean height of players on the soccer team, about twice the
variability (mean absolute deviation) on either team; on a dot plotG (line plot), the separation
between the two distributions of heights is noticeable.
Learning Goal: Students will be able to calculate and interpret mean, median, and mode and be
able to draw inferences from a data set and be able to compare and contrast populations.
Measurable Objectives:
Students will be able to identify the data set with 80% accuracy or 4/5 trails.
Students will be able to list the steps and be able to implement them to calculate mean
with 80% accuracy or 4/5 trails.
Students will be able to list the steps and be able to implement them to calculate median
with 80% accuracy or 4/5 trails.
Students will be able to list the steps and be able to implement them to calculate mode
with 80% accuracy or 4/5 trails.
Students will be able to list the steps and be able to implement them to calculate mean
absolute deviation with 80% accuracy or 4/5 trails.
Students will be able to interpret the data and its meaning with 80% accuracy or 4/5
trails.
Objectives will be measured using formative and summative assessments. Formative
assessments will be given daily and will consist of classwork, homework, bell work, and exit
tickets.
Summative assessment will consist of a pre and post-assessment in which students will be placed
into highly proficient, proficient, partially proficient, and minimally proficient based on their
score. The scoring range is as follows:
Highly proficient: 23/25
Proficient: 20/25
If you would like feedback on your pre-assessment for alignment prior to administering, copy it
in here.
Pre-Assessment - Copy and paste the pre-assessment you plan to use to assess the
students’ knowledge of the topic prior to implementing the unit lessons. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether the student is Highly Proficient, Proficient,
Partially Proficient, Minimally Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal
and measurable objectives.
The dot plots below show the top ten test scores for each of Mr. LeGros Period A and Period B
math classes. Refer to the dot plot to answer questions 1-5.
1. Find the measures of center - mean, median, and mode - for the Period A data. (3 points)
2. Find the measures of variability - range, median, upper quartile, lower quartile, and interquartile range
- of the Period A data. (5 points)
3. Find the mean absolute deviation of the Period A data. Round to the nearest tenth. (1 point)
4. Find the mean absolute deviation of the Period B data. Round to the nearest tenth. (1 point)
5. What conclusion can you make based on the mean absolute deviations of the Period A and Period B
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Proficient
(80%-89%) 1
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%) 3
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 2
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’
knowledge of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same
as the pre-assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same
concepts. Include the scoring criteria used to determine whether students are Highly Proficient,
Proficient, Partially Proficient, Minimally Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal
and measurable objectives.
1. Find the measures of center - mean, median, and mode - for the 2007 data. (3 points)
2. Find the measures of variability - range, median, upper quartile, lower quartile, and interquartile range -
of the 2007 data. (5 points)
3. Find the mean absolute deviation of the 2007 data. Round to the nearest tenth. (2 points)
5. What conclusion can you make based on the mean absolute deviations of the 2007 and 2011 home run
data? (1 point)
6. A stock had quarterly gains of 9%, 12%, 9%, and 14%. Which measure of center makes the stock look
the most profitable?
7. Which statement explains why it is reasonable to infer which doctor has the greater variability in
weekly patients? (1 point)
8. The double box plot shows student test scores for two classrooms.
Which statement appropriately compares the test scores of the two classrooms? (2 points)
a. In general, the students in Room 240 did better than those in Room 300, and they have more
variability in their scores.
b. In general, the students in Room 240 did better than those in Room 300, and they have less
variability in their scores.
c. In general, the students in Room 300 did better than those in Room 240, and they have more
variability in their scores.
d. In general, the students in Room 300 did better than those in Room 240, and they have less
variability in their scores.
9. Which pair of data sets provide no evidence that the values of Set A are greater than the values of Set
B? (1 point)
Write an inference you can make about the centers and variance of the populations. (6 points)
3. 6.5
4. 2.0
5. The number of home runs hit by major league leaders in 2011 were more closely clustered around the
mean number of home runs hit than they were in 2007.
6. The centers are fairly close but the variability in 2007 is greater than in 2011. This implies that in 2011
the competition between the home run leaders was more competitive than in 2007.
7. mean
8. b
9. d
10. d
11. Members of Team A are likely older, and they have less variability in their ages.
12. Yes
7.SP.2 Broaden 7.SP.2 Broaden 7.SP.2 Broaden 7.SP.2 Broaden 7.SP.2 Broaden
statistical reasoning statistical reasoning statistical reasoning statistical reasoning statistical reasoning
by using the GAISE by using the GAISE by using the GAISE by using the GAISE by using the GAISE
model: a. Formulate model: a. Formulate model: a. Formulate model: a. Formulate model: a. Formulate
Questions: Questions: Questions: Questions: Questions:
Recognize and Recognize and Recognize and Recognize and Recognize and
formulate a formulate a formulate a formulate a formulate a
statistical question as statistical question as statistical question as statistical question as statistical question as
one that anticipates one that anticipates one that anticipates one that anticipates one that anticipates
variability and can variability and can variability and can variability and can variability and can
be answered with be answered with be answered with be answered with be answered with
quantitative data. quantitative data. quantitative data. quantitative data. quantitative data.
For example, “How For example, “How For example, “How For example, “How For example, “How
do the heights of do the heights of do the heights of do the heights of do the heights of
seventh graders seventh graders seventh graders seventh graders seventh graders
compare to the compare to the compare to the compare to the compare to the
heights of eighth heights of eighth heights of eighth heights of eighth heights of eighth
graders?” (GAISE graders?” (GAISE graders?” (GAISE graders?” (GAISE graders?” (GAISE
Model, step 1) Model, step 1) Model, step 1) Model, step 1) Model, step 1)
b. Collect Data: b. Collect Data: b. Collect Data: b. Collect Data: b. Collect Data:
Design and use a Design and use a Design and use a Design and use a Design and use a
plan to collect plan to collect plan to collect plan to collect plan to collect
appropriate data to appropriate data to appropriate data to appropriate data to appropriate data to
c. Analyze Data: c. Analyze Data: c. Analyze Data: c. Analyze Data: c. Analyze Data:
Select appropriate Select appropriate Select appropriate Select appropriate Select appropriate
graphical methods graphical methods graphical methods graphical methods graphical methods
and numerical and numerical and numerical and numerical and numerical
measures to analyze measures to analyze measures to analyze measures to analyze measures to analyze
data by displaying data by displaying data by displaying data by displaying data by displaying
variability within a variability within a variability within a variability within a variability within a
group, comparing group, comparing group, comparing group, comparing group, comparing
individual to individual to individual to individual to individual to
individual, and individual, and individual, and individual, and individual, and
comparing comparing comparing comparing comparing
individual to group. individual to group. individual to group. individual to group. individual to group.
(GAISE Model, step (GAISE Model, step (GAISE Model, step (GAISE Model, step (GAISE Model, step
3) 3) 3) 3) 3)
d. Interpret Results: d. Interpret Results: d. Interpret Results: d. Interpret Results: d. Interpret Results:
Draw logical Draw logical Draw logical Draw logical Draw logical
conclusions and conclusions and conclusions and conclusions and conclusions and
make generalizations make generalizations make generalizations make generalizations make generalizations
from the data based from the data based from the data based from the data based from the data based
on the original on the original on the original on the original on the original
question. (GAISE question. (GAISE question. (GAISE question. (GAISE question. (GAISE
Model, step 4) Model, step 4) Model, step 4) Model, step 4) Model, step 4)
7.SP.3 Describe and 7.SP.3 Describe and 7.SP.3 Describe and 7.SP.3 Describe and 7.SP.3 Describe and
analyze analyze analyze analyze analyze
b. Informally assess b. Informally assess b. Informally assess b. Informally assess b. Informally assess
the degree of visual the degree of visual the degree of visual the degree of visual the degree of visual
overlap of two overlap of two overlap of two overlap of two overlap of two
numerical data numerical data numerical data numerical data numerical data
distributions with distributions with distributions with distributions with distributions with
roughly equal roughly equal roughly equal roughly equal roughly equal
variabilities, variabilities, variabilities, variabilities, variabilities,
measuring the measuring the measuring the measuring the measuring the
difference between difference between difference between difference between difference between
the centers by the centers by the centers by the centers by the centers by
expressing it as a expressing it as a expressing it as a expressing it as a expressing it as a
multiple of a multiple of a multiple of a multiple of a multiple of a
measure of measure of measure of measure of measure of
variability. For variability. For variability. For variability. For variability. For
example, the mean example, the mean example, the mean example, the mean example, the mean
height of players on height of players on height of players on height of players on height of players on
the basketball team the basketball team the basketball team the basketball team the basketball team
is 10 cm greater is 10 cm greater is 10 cm greater is 10 cm greater is 10 cm greater
than the mean than the mean height than the mean height than the mean height than the mean height
height of players on of players on the of players on the of players on the of players on the
the soccer team, soccer team, about soccer team, about soccer team, about soccer team, about
Specific Learning Students will be able Students will be able Students will be able Students will be able Students will be able
Target(s)/Objectives to calculate and to calculate and to calculate and to calculate and to calculate and
Based on state standards, interpret mean, interpret mean, interpret mean, interpret mean, interpret mean,
identify what is intended to be
measured in learning.
median, and mode median, and mode median, and mode median, and mode median, and mode
and be able to draw and be able to draw and be able to draw and be able to draw and be able to draw
inferences from a inferences from a inferences from a inferences from a inferences from a
data set and be able data set and be able data set and be able data set and be able data set and be able
to compare and to compare and to compare and to compare and to compare and
contrast populations. contrast populations. contrast populations. contrast populations. contrast populations.
Academic Language Statistics Mean Statistics Mean Mean
General academic vocabulary Mean Median Mean Median Median
and content-specific Median Mode Mean Absolute Mode Mode
vocabulary included in the Mode Measures of Deviation Interquartile range Measures of
unit. Measures of Center Variability Outlier Variability
Compare Range Range Range
Quartiles Compare Populations Quartiles
Interquartile range Box plot Interquartile range
Outlier Double box plot Outlier
Statistics
Mean Absolute
Deviation
Unit Resources, Guided Notes Guided Notes Guided Notes Guided notes Practice test
Materials, Equipment, White Board White Board White Board White Board Pencils
and Technology Dry Erase Board Dry Erase Board Dry Erase Board Pencils Calculators
List all resources, materials, Pencils Pencils Pencils Paper
equipment, and technology to Paper Paper Paper Calculators
be used in the unit. Calculators Calculators Calculators Sample problems
Depth of Knowledge Level 1: What does a Level 1: What does Level 1: What does the Level 1: How can you Level 1: How do we
Lesson Questions measure of center tell variability mean to mean tell us? use measures of center find mean, median,
What questions can be posed us? you? to compare mode, and range?
throughout the lesson to Level 2: Describe how populations?
assess all levels of student Level 2: Describe how Level 2: Describe how to find the mean Level 2: What
understanding? to find the mean, to find the interquartile absolute deviation. Level 2: What is an inferences can you
Level 1: Recall median, and mode. range. inference you can make about the data?
Level 2: Skill/Concepts Level 3: Find the mean make from a double
Level 3: Strategic
Level 3: Use the Level 3: Use the absolute deviation of box plot? Level 3: How do you
Thinking
following set of data to following chart to the following boys’ calculate the mean
Level 4: Extended
calculate the mean, calculate the and girls’ soccer Level 3: What is the absolute deviation?
Thinking
median, and mode. interquartile range of team’s goals. interquartile range of
the data. the box plot? Level 4: Can you
Level 4: How do Level 4: How does the create your own set of
varying circumstances Level 4: What is mean absolute Level 4: Can you data and find the
determine the most something that you deviation tell us? name an example of interquartile range?
appropriate measure of can interpret from the populations you could
center? interquartile range of compare using a
the data? double box plot?
Anticipatory Set Students will complete Students will complete Students will be given A double box plot will A riddle will be on the
How will students’ prior bell work when they a bell work assignment a white board and be shown on the board board when the
knowledge be activated as enter the classroom. that requires them to asked to find the at the beginning of students enter the
well as gain student interest find the mean of a data measures of center of a class. Students will be class. The riddle is
in the upcoming content? set. data set. I will have the asked what they think meant to engage the
students hold up their the data is showing. student’s math brain.
board so I can see their What is the mean,
Use an online video platform such as Loom, YouTube, or Vimeo to upload your completed video.
Be sure that others can access and view your linked video prior to submitting.
The implementation of the unit was executed in my resource room and went very well.
The first day of the unit we covered measures of center. I recorded the first portion of this lesson
for my video segment. During this lesson the students were engaged in the topic as they had gone
over how to find mean, median, and mode. On the next day we begun a lesson over measures of
variability. This lesson focusses on being able to find the range, median, and interquartile range
when given a data set. During this lesson the students were engaged but struggled to understand
the concept. Being that this lesson is more difficult I really had to slow down to make sure that
my students grasped the concept. Before the students left for the day I had them complete an exit
ticket that I used as a formative assessment. On the third day of the lesson we focused on
calculating the mean absolute deviation when given a set of data. The students did a great job of
finding the initial mean. However, they struggled at first when asked to find the absolute values
between each value and the mean. On the following day we began to use the techniques we had
learned from the previous three days to compare populations. The goal of this lesson was to have
the students compare multiple data sets and infer something about the data. The students were
asked to form small groups and complete sample problems. They did a great job of staying
focused on the topic and asking questions when necessary. On the final day of the lesson, I chose
to use the opportunity to revisit the previous topics of the lesson. During the lesson, I addressed
specific issues I was seeing on the student’s formative assessments. I took this as a chance to
reteach, reinforce, and enrich the previously taught lessons. This seemed to have a large impact on my
student’s ability to grow in their confidence levels. Overall, I feel that the implementation of this
lesson went well, and I look forward to continuing to work and develop lessons to meet the
specific needs of my students.
As I watched over the video, it was eye opening to see things that I thought worked really
well and things that I would have done better. One of the things that I think went really well was
supplying the students with guided notes before the lesson. The guided notes helped the students
stay focused and allowed them to follow along with the lesson. It also allowed them to watch the
lesson and not be so concerned with taking notes that they miss something important. Another
thing that I think went well was each student’s willingness to participate in the lesson. Being that
the lesson was taught in a small group it allowed me to assess each student’s understanding
through guided discussion. I also think that the use of technology helped too, the students were
easily following along with the lesson.
Although there were many good aspects of this lesson there were a few things that I
would change. One of the things I would change would be to have wrote the data set on a part of
the board that I wasn’t standing in front of. This may have made it difficult for some of the
students to follow along. A second thing I would have changed would have been to ask the
students if they had the notes written down and had any questions about finding the mean before
moving on to the mode. By doing so, I would have been able to address any questions right then
so that each student could have more clarity. A third thing I would have done differently would
have been to call a student up to write the answers on the board. I remember when I was a
student, I loved being able to write on the white board and this would have allowed me to further
engage my students in the lesson.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient 0 0
(90%-100%)
Proficient
1 2
(80%-89%)
Partially
Proficient 3 3
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient 2 1
(69% and below)
Post-Test Analysis: Whole Class
After looking at the post-test results in comparison to the pre-test results, I was able to
interoperate that the majority of the students in my class were able to show adequate growth. As
shown in the table above, I had one student grow from partially proficient into the proficient
range. Additionally, I had one student grow from the minimally proficient range into the partially
proficient range. While the remaining students scored in the same percentile, their scores did
improve from the bottom of each category towards the top. For instance, Tom whose pre-test
score was a 55% ended up scoring a 67% on the post test. Even though I would love to see all of
my students test into the highly proficient range, I do feel the growth my students have shown
over the course of this lesson was positive and something to expand upon when moving forward.
Based on the whole class post-test data I feel that I did a pretty good job of meeting each
student’s needs, abilities, and interests. Three of the five students in my class have behavior goals
in their IEP’s. With the majority of those goals focusing on on-task behavior and task-completion.
There were a few times over the course of this unit where one of my students would put his head
down on the desk. He as not disruptive to his classmates during this time but I could tell that
something was off with this student. Once I got through the I DO part of the lesson and into the
This specific group of students frequently demonstrates behaviors that get in the way of them
learning at their full potential. Their behaviors include refusal to work, making noises in class,
putting their heads down, and/or walking out of class. During the unit the students were slightly
less disruptive than normal. Although none of them tested into a higher category all of the
students did score better on the post-test in comparison to the pre-test. There were a few examples
that also led me to that conclusion. On the second day the student who had previously tested in
the minimally proficient category raised his hand and volunteered to come up to the board and
show students how to calculate the mean. This was a very encouraging as it helped show me that
the student was showing growth not only academically but socially and emotionally as well.
Throughout the lesson I felt that I was moderately effective in reaching each students’ needs. I
When comparing the data of this group to that of the subgroup there were some slight differences.
Although, both groups showed growth, the subgroup performed slightly below the remainder of
the class. This could be because of the subgroups willingness to fully participate in the lessons.
Even though they were not disruptive, it was difficult to gauge their engagement in the lesson.
The data shows my instruction did a sufficient job of reaching the students in the remainder of the
class. Two of the students jumped up an entire grade, while the third student jumped up a partial
grade level.
Based on my analysis for the entire class the students did a good job of understanding the
concepts taught in the unit. However, the students need to be provided with additional
opportunities to practice and master the techniques that were taught. To provide them with the
repeated repetitions I will be assigning them ALEK topics that they will need to complete. Each
student will need to reach 80% mastery level on all assigned topics.
Long-Term Goals: Teachers who are dedicated to their profession and to improving the lives of
students will continually look for ways to grow and learn. The best way to ensure that learning is
prioritized is to create a long-term goal. Create one long term goal that is specific and
measurable. Make sure to discuss the following:
Long-Term Goal: Gain a better understanding of Trauma-Informed Care
Rationale: I am currently an ED teacher and
work with numerous students who have
experienced different levels of trauma. By
increasing my knowledge of trauma, I will be
able to better serve my students as I will get
to know different traumas, triggers, and how
to recognize and address these issues.
Resources:
Wooster City School District.
Tri-County Educational Service Center -
http://www.youresc.k12.oh.us