Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/279191334
Article in Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering · June 2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2181196
CITATION READS
1 760
4 authors, including:
V. S. Bagnato
University of São Paulo
709 PUBLICATIONS 9,069 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Discoloration of root canal by photosensitizers curcumin and methylene blue View project
All content following this page was uploaded by R.F.Z. Lizarelli on 13 October 2015.
ABSTRACT
Blue led system irradiation shows many important properties on skin as: bacterial decontamination, degradation of
endogenous skin chromophores and biostimulation. In this clinical study we prove that the blue light improves the skin
hydration. In the literature none authors reports this biological property on skin. Then this study aims to discuss the role
of blue light in the skin hydration. Twenty patients were selected to this study with age between 25-35 years old and
phototype I, II and III. A defined area from forearm was pre determined (A = 4.0 cm2). The study was randomized in two
treatment groups using one blue light device (power of 5.3mW and irradiance of 10.8mW/cm²). The first treatment group
was irradiated with 3J/cm2 (277 seconds) and the second with 6J/cm2 (555 seconds). The skin hydration evaluations were
done using a corneometer. The measurements were collected in 7, 14, 21 and 30 days, during the treatment. Statistical test
of ANOVA, Tukey and T-Student were applied considering 5% of significance. In conclusion, both doses were able to
improve the skin hydration; however, 6J/cm2 has kept this hydration for 30 days.
1. INTRODUCTION
In facial and body aesthetic treatments, phototherapy application, using lasers and LEDs in low and medium intensity, has
been usually applied. The main is to improve the metabolic activity in the treatment of skin disorders that occurs in aging
process. Its becomes greater in the photoaging process such as: lines and wrinkles, spots, puffy eyes and dark circles,
breakdown of collagen and elastin decreasing the elasticity and strength as well as disorders as stretch marks, cellulite,
acne and alopecia. Another important effect, reported in the literature, has been associated to its action in the postoperative
care, in the skin healing processes, analgesic and in the lymphatic drainage. [1]. Another clinical application that have been
showed great results is acne and rosettes skin [2-4].
The absorption and penetration of light in the biological tissue are dependent on the wavelength of the chromophore on
the tissue. Longer wavelengths present lower energy and higher penetration on the tissue. On the other hand small
wavelengths show higher energy and lower skin penetration. In this context the blue light shows a superficial skin action
[5-6].
The treatment of acne with phototherapy is already established, where the principle of phototherapy is based on interaction
of light with the porphyrin present inside the bacteria P. acnes at skin where by photochemical reactions the
microorganisms are induced to death by necrosis and apoptosis mechanism [2,7]. The acne treatment using blue light
(LEDs in 450 ± 20nm) after some sessions (sessions 6 to 10) has great results at skin in the oil control since that shows a
decreasing in the oil at skin surface although showing a homogeneous and illuminated aspect. But in this case due to
increasing of water content that improves the normal circulation decreasing the opacity of skin. The excess of oil at skin
by physical properties (reflection of light) increases the bright and consequently the fine lines and wrinkles perception.
The reduction of oil decrease the possibility to appears infectious (pustules, papules, nodules) and inflammatory (open and
Biophotonics South America, edited by Cristina Kurachi, Katarina Svanberg, Bruce J. Tromberg,
Vanderlie Salvador Bagnato, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9531, 95311W · © 2015 SPIE
CCC code: 1605-7422/15/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.2181196
The protocol used in this study followed the procedures establish by Human Research Ethics Committee of Brazil. Written
informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ten man patients, with age between 25-35 years old, with a clinical
diagnosis of normal skin were recruited for this clinical study. To be considered eligible, a patient had to be free of skin
disorders on both arms. All patients had Fitzpatrick skin types II (50%) or III (50%). Patients with lesions in the target area
were excluded. Additional exclusion criteria included female volunteers and volunteers that have habit to apply cosmetic
at skin.
The study was randomized in two treatment groups. The first treatment group (GI) was performed using blue light
irradiation at forearm skin (forearm) with light dose of 3J/cm2 and the second treatment group (GII) using light dose of
6J/cm2. The control group (CG), was performed on the additional arm from volunteer. Comparisons were made for each
treatment group and between both treatments in 7, 14, 21 and 30 days. The treatment was performed twice a week during
30 days. The region irradiated can be visualized in figure 1.
Firstly, the volunteer’s skin was cleaned using physiological solutions and were maintained in a controlled environment
(humidity and temperature) to avoid interferences in the hydration evaluations. The temperature monitored between 18°C
2.4 Statistics
Statistical test of ANOVA, Tukey and T-Student were applied considering significance level of 5%.
3. RESULTS
In the table 1 is possible to observe the hydration data and its standard deviation to both treatment groups (I and II). In
each group we found an internal control.
In the Figure 3 we can observe the skin hydration curve as a function of treatment days for both treatment groups irradiated
using blue LED device with fluence of 3 and 6J/cm2.
28
Hydratation (%)
26
24
22
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)
Figure 3: Skin Hydration evaluation for both treatment groups using blue LED device in the fluency of 3 and 6J/cm2.
According to Figure 3, the increased of hydration occurred after 15 days of treatment with blue light, during the treatment.
Using the fluence of 3J/cm2 the hydration increased after 20 days of blue light treatment, however the difference between
skin control and treated area with blue light decreases around 30 days. On the other hand using fluence of 6J/cm2 the
hydration increased after 15 days and remains greater than control group during the 30 days.
4. DISCUSSION
The epidermis, a homeostatic and self-renewing tissue, requires a balanced level of hydration for the ideal proliferation,
differentiation, and physiological integrity of the epithelial cells of which it is composed. Water is vital for the proper
physiological functioning and maintenance of the epidermis, and for the outward appearance of healthy skin [14].
Therapy with light sources using equipments based on laser or LED, as a research area as well as therapeutic applications,
is widely used in the medical, dental and physiotherapy, as well as aesthetics procedures. It is important note that the LEDs
devices are more affordable light emitting sources of economic point of view and have a greater emitting area of light
compared to laser [15]. Furthermore, therapeutic effects on biological tissues appear to be more related to wavelength and
the applied dose, and less related to the light emitting source [16].
Phototherapy with wavelengths in the blue (400 to 500nm) has recently presented a broad range of applications. This is a
spectral range that can accelerate and direct chemical reactions, including cellular metabolism. It is absorbed by
Flavoproteins [10], in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, by hemoglobin, porphyrins and by the reduced cytochrome c
[17] in biological tissues and most of biomaterials due to its spectral range.
In this study, the hypothesis that another successful application for phototherapy with blue LED could be the cutaneous
hydration seems to confirm the clinical findings.
Equally or more important than the electromagnetic spectrum used here, it seems that the energy density that varied
depending on the irradiation time, and therefore the amount of deposited energy and the irradiation time in the tissue
affected the results. According to the results suggests up when the light dose was 6 J/cm2 for irradiation time of 9 minutes,
5. CONCLUSIONS
In a deal with the results the application of blue light improves the skin hydration avoiding the transepidermal water loss
(TEWL). The fluence of 6J/cm2 increases the hydration in 15 days and remains during 30 days. This data suggest that blue
light can be a good alternative to all aesthetic procedures in facial skin care. Then, it is possible to conclude that the blue
light improves the skin water content that is directly correlated to the skin aging process decreases as in other skin
dysfunctions either.
REFERENCES
[1] Hode, L. and Tunér, J., [Laser phototherapy - clinical practice and scientific background], Prima Books
(Grangesberg), 2014.
[2] Papageorgiou, P., Katsambas, A. and Chu, A., "Phototherapy with blue (415 nm) and red (660 nm) light in the
treatment of acne vulgaris", Br J Dermatol. 142, 973-978 (2000).
[3] Paolillo, F. R., Borghi-Silva, A., Parizotto, N. A., Kurachi, C. and Bagnato, V. S., "New Treatment of Cellulite
with Infrared-Led Illumination Applied During High-Intensity Treadmill Training." Journal of Cosmetic and Laser
Therapy 13(4), 166-171 (2011).
[4] Uebelhoer, N.S. and Dover, J.S., "Photodynamic therapy for cosmetic applications." Dermatol Ther. 18 242-252
(2005).
[5] Vladimirov, Y.A., Osipov, A. N. and G.I. Klebanov, [Photobiological Principles of Therapeutic Applications of
Laser Radiation], Biochemistry (Moscow), 2004.
[6] Whelan, H.T., Smits Jr., R. L. and Buchman, E. V., "Effect of NASA Light-Emitting Diode Irradiation on Wound
Healing." Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery 19, 305-314 (2001).
[7] Hönigsmann, H. "History of phototherapy in dermatology." Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 12, 16-21 (2013).
[8] Dai, T. et al. "Blue light for infectious diseases: Propionibacterium acnes, Helicobacter pylori, and beyond?" Drug
Resist Updat. 15(4), 223–236 (2012).
[9] Hellmann, J, Ramirez, C. A., "Evaluation of Self-Treatment of Acne Using Silk’n Blue Phototherapy System." Journal
of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications 4, 179-184 (2014).
[10] Karu, T. I. [Ten lectures on basic science of laser phototherapy.] Prima Books (Grangesberg), 2008.
[11] Selmina, F., et al. "Regenerated keratin membrane to match the in vitro drug diffusion through human epidermis."
Results in Pharma Sciences 2, 72-78 (2012).
[12] Nielsen, K.P., ZHAO, L., Stamnes, J. J. et al. The optics of human skin: Aspects important for human health. In:
[Solar Radiation and Human Health] Espen Bjertness (Oslo) 2008.
[13] Liebmann, J., Born, M. and V. Kolb-Bachofen, "Blue-Light Irradiation Regulates Proliferation and
Differentiation in Human Skin Cells." Journal of Investigative Dermatology 130, 259–269 (2010).
[14] High, W.; Del Rosso, J.; Levin, J., "Skin structure and function: translation of research to patient care." The Journal
of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology 5(7), 53-56 (2012).
DownloadedViewFrom:
publicationhttp://spiedigitallibrary.org/
stats on 06/25/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms