Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TERMS OF REFERENCE
NOVOTEL HOTEL
SHARQ, KUWAIT
1.1. General
The investigation involves Wind Engineering Studies to be carried out on the above
noted project. Unless otherwise noted the results of the studies are to be based on
the testing of physical scale models of the building and its surrounding structures in a
wind tunnel laboratory.
1.2. Objectives
o Existing Code Review to review and assess the requirements of various local
codes, and initial estimate of wind loads and accelerations.
o Structural Wind Load Study to determine wind induced forces acting on the
building structure and to predict building movements and accelerations at key
floors.
o Cladding Wind Load Study to obtain surface wind loads for the design and
detailing of the exterior cladding of the building.
o Pedestrian Level Wind Comfort Study to determine the pedestrian wind comfort
levels in key designated areas around the site.
2.1 Brief Description of Lateral Load Resisting System: The lateral load resisting
system for the tower and podium, consists of reinforced concrete shear walls. The
wall thickness, wall length and concrete strength vary to suit the stiffness
requirements and also, of course, the strength demands. Drawings will be provided
giving further details.
2.2 Brief Description of Gravity Load Resisting System: The gravity load resisting
system consists of reinforced concrete slabs, beams and girders supported on
columns and walls. The element dimensions and the concrete strength vary with
stiffness requirements and strength demand. Drawings will be provided giving
further details.
2.3 The preliminary structural characteristics: Primary modes shapes for movements
in X and Y directions and in Torsion, building periods/frequencies for each of the
primary modes, mass and polar mass moment of inertia of each floor, and the
reference coordinate system will be provided by KEO during Design Development
and Final Design Phases. The provision of this information will be coordinated with
the Wind Engineering firm to suit the agreed programme.
3.1.1 During the design phase, it is expected that clarification, interpretation and
consultation between the KEO Design Team and the Wind Engineering Firm
will be required.
3.1.2 The Wind Engineering Firm is required to make available the appropriate
staff to address any questions, requests for clarification and the like.
3.1.3 Prior to the testing of the scale model in the wind tunnel laboratory the
Design Team would like to engage the Wind Engineering Firm in preliminary
discussion to address critical issues such as effects of future neighbouring
developments, the likelihood of acceleration concerns, etc.
3.2.1 The Wind Engineering Firm shall advise on the appropriate wind regime
based on the meteorological data for the area and any applicable codes
and/or regulations. Please identify to the Structural Consultants when
the statistical model of the local wind climate can not be based on
hourly surface wind measurements taken at nearby meteorological
station(s) over a period of greater than 15 years.
3.2.2 The model scale is expected to be between 1:300 and 1:500 but the
advice and/or recommendations from the Wind Engineering firm is
sought with respect to appropriate scales of models.
3.3 Phase 1: Existing Code Review and Preliminary Wind Load Assessment
3.3.4 In conjunction with code review noted above, the consultant is to carry
out a preliminary desk study assessment of the wind loads acting on
the building, for the purpose of preliminary design of the structural and
curtain wall systems. The consultant is required to provide a summary
table and graph outlining the applied forces (shear, moment and
torque) as well as cumulative forces acting at each level.
3.3.6 The information provided at the end of Phase 2 will be used for the
design development of the structural and curtain wall systems.
Wind Engineering Studies - TOR
KEO International Consultants
December 2014
Page 5 of 12
Novotel Hotel-Sharq-Kuwait
3.4.1 The structural wind load study should be conducted using the high-
frequency force balance technique or the high-frequency-pressure-
integration technique, as appropriate. The model construction
(featuring all details that could significantly affect the overall structural
wind loads) and the load measuring techniques are to suit the type of
test conducted.
3.4.2 The study model (including the proximity model) should be tested in a
boundary layer wind tunnel in the presence of the proximity model and
a fully simulated turbulent wind. Measurements of mean, RMS and
peak base loadings / generalised aerodynamic forces and torque shall
be made for a minimum of 36 wind directions at 10 degree intervals.
Power spectra of these aerodynamic loads shall also be evaluated.
3.4.3 Using data supplied by the structural engineer on the building’s mass
distribution and modal deflections, together with the measured spectra
of aerodynamic loadings, the dynamic responses of the structure as a
function of wind speed should be determined. These results should
then be combined with the mathematical model of the local wind
statistics in order to predict full scale base moments, shears and
accelerations as a function of return period.
3.4.4 The wind force and torque distributions as a function of height shall be
provided in the form of floor by floor loads (or equivalent static pressure
distributions) for selected return periods (10, 50 or 100 years). If this
information is provided for only a single return period, provide a formula
allowing conversion to other return periods.
3.4.6 As a separately identified price, allow for the re-analysis of the wind
tunnel test data for an additional or revised set of building structural
properties.
3.5.1 The model of the study building should be constructed to include all surface
details measuring greater than 300 mm at full scale and be of a suitable
construction for such a study. Sufficient pressure taps shall be installed on
the model to accurately define the local peak pressures and suctions acting
on the building’s exterior surfaces, with special attention being given to
possible regions of high wind loads on the facades, roofs, and soffits.
(Indicate proposed number of pressure tops in response to this RFP.)
3.5.2 The study model (including the proximity model) shall be tested in a boundary
layer wind tunnel in the presence of the proximity model and a fully simulated
turbulent wind. The mean, RMS (root-mean-square) and the peak maximum
and minimum pressure coefficients, based on the gradient wind pressure at
each pressure tap should be measured for 36 wind directions in 10 degree
intervals.
3.5.3 The test results should be analyzed with the wind climate model to determine
maximum exterior wind loads for each pressure tap for the 50 and 100 year
return periods. The analytical approach should take into consideration the
directionality of the wind (e.g. with up-crossing or time history approach).
3.5.4 Estimates of the interior pressure should be made and added to the predicted
exterior pressures to determine the net wind loads on the cladding system.
Allowance shall be made for the possibility of there being openings in the
building envelope where appropriate (operable windows, impact of debris in
the lower levels).
3.5.5 At building corners the combinations of wind loads on the two wall faces shall
be measured for the purpose of corner framing design of the cladding
system.
3.6.1 Suitable sensors or probes for measuring the mean, RMS and peak gust
speeds at a full scale height of approximately 1.5m above ground shall be
installed on the model in sidewalks, plaza and other outdoor pedestrian-use
areas.
3.6.2 Allow for approximately 60 wind speed measurement locations, including all
locations specifically identified by the Design Team and other areas where
problems may be anticipated based on a wind professional’s judgment.
Please indicate to the Design Team whether more or less measuring location
may be required
3.6.3 The test model together with the proximity model should be tested in a
boundary layer wind tunnel for a minimum of 36 equally spaced wind
directions. The mean, RMS and gust speeds should be recorded at each
measurement location for each test direction
3.6.4 The wind tunnel data shall be analysed with the long term meteorological
statistics for the area to predict how often selected wind speed ranges will
occur at each location.
3.6.5 The predicted wind speeds should be compared with criteria to determine
both safety and comfort at each location. The criteria for safety and comfort
are to be compared to the recommendations outlined by T.V. Lawson (1973,
“The wind environment of buildings: a logical approach to the establishment
of criteria” University of Bristol, Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering, Report No.
TVL 7321). The advice and/or recommendations from the Wind Tunnel
Engineering Firm is sought with respect to possible alternate criteria
3.6.6 Options and recommendations for potential wind control measures (in the
form of landscaping, wind screens, canopies or minor changes to the
architectural features of the lower portion of the buildings) are to be provided
in areas where undesirable wind conditions are predicted. Allow for two
alternative solutions to be examined for further design development.
4.1.1 The proposal should include relevant experience and list of key staff for the
project along with CV’s.
4.1.2 Proposal should include a cost breakdown, earliest start date and proposed
programme.
4.1.3 Proposals should include a list of information required from the design team
and the latest date this information can be received without affecting the
programme.
4.1.4 It has been assumed that procedure of the study will involve physical testing
of scale models in a wind tunnel. The proposal should clearly indicate where
computer simulations are proposed instead of physical testing in a wind
tunnel.
4.1.5 Submit proposals to the Project Manager, KEO International Consultants in
Kuwait.
4.1.6 Submit invoices to KEO International Consultants at the above address.
4.1.7 Submit the proposal within one week of receipt of this TOR.
4.2.1 Address reports to the Project Manager, KEO International Consultants, and
provide 3 copies of the same.
4.3.1 All work to be carried out in accordance with the applicable local codes, the
ASCE-7 and the International Building Code
Base Study
Consultation (List assumptions)
with Design
Team
Wind Climate (Provide details including scale and proposed
Analysis and construction of the models)
Model
Construction
Structural
Wind Load
Study
Cladding
Wind Load
Study
Wind Comfort
Study
Flow
Visualisation
Study
Total
Optional
Studies
Additional At wind tunnel Laboratory
Meeting At project site (or vicinity)
Additional For alternate set of structural properties (analysis
Structural only)
Wind Load For alternate phasing configuration
Studies For alternate surrounding condition
For specialty structures
Additional For impact on neighbouring structures
Cladding For alternate phasing configuration
Load Studies For alternate surrounding condition
Additional For alternate phasing configuration
Wind Comfort For alternate surrounding condition
Studies For testing development of remedial wind control
measures
Flow For alternate phasing configuration
Visualisation For alternate surrounding condition
Studies For testing development of remedial measures
Further
testing as
recommended
by Wind
Wind Engineering Studies - TOR
KEO International Consultants
December 2014
Page 11 of 12
Novotel Hotel-Sharq-Kuwait
Item Description Cost
Engineering
Firm not listed
above
Total
5.4 Programme
Study Week