GGN DD 033 - D0 PDF

DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 121+255 1
December 2018
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31 D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur - Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
DETAILED ENGINEERING IN CONNECTION WITH REHABILITATION AND

UP-GRADATION TO FOUR LANING OF NH-31 D FROM KM. 113+200 TO KM.
154+854 (PACKAGE-2-A) OF GHOSHPUKUR - SALSALABARI SECTION IN
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL ON EPC MODE
CLIENT: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI)
CONTRACTOR: SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 121+255
Document Title Design Report – Major Bridge 121+255

Project no. 4800197
Document No. 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Version No. D0
Date of submission 17.12.2018
Designer Vishal
Checker Siddhartha
SUMMARY OF REVISIONS
Approved By
Description of
Rev Date
modification/revision
Name/Position Signature
Design of Substructure & D. Ray

D0 17.12.2018
Foundation for Review Design Director
NMDC–RLIANCE–RIZZANI JV 2
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31 D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur - Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………4
1.1 SCOPE
1.2 GEOMETRIC DESCRIPTION
2. DESIGN OF FIXED ABUTMENT (A1)…………………………………………5-73
3. DESIGN OF FREE ABUTMENT (A2)…………………………………………74-145
4. DESIGN OF ABUTMENT PILE CAP………………………………………….146-161
5. DESIGN OF PIER P1 & P2…………………………………………………….162-217
6. DESIGN OF PIER PILE CAP………………………………………………….218-235
7. DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESTRAINERS & PEDASTAL……………………..236-245
8. DESIGN OF TEST PILE………………………………………………………..246-251
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to
Four Laning of NH-31 D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of
Ghoshpukur - Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
1 INTRODUCTION
The project scope is to widening of NH-31D from km 113.200 near Ghoshpukur to chainage
of 154.854 near Salsalabari. The project is an upgradation of existing two lane highway to
four lane highway. This report summarizes the design calculation of Major Bridge at
chainage 121+255
.
1.1 Scope
The present document constitutes the structural design for Palasbari Bridge at Chainage
121+255. The report is based on available data presented in geotechnical report submitted
on 31st October 2018 by Geotech consultants and SIMPLEX. Any changes in the basic data
may needs further revision of this report.
1.2 Geometric description
This bridge has been designed as 3 span simply supported bridge of center to center
expansion joint span length 24.3m (skew 25 degree). The superstructure is constitutes of
five numbers of precast RCC I – girder with cast in situ RCC deck slab. As per geotechnical
investigation report pile foundation has been adopted for designing substructure for this
bridge. The pile cap top level has been kept at 0.5m below the existing ground level. The
vertical clearance available from the soffit of the superstructure to the HFL is 0.9m. (Refer
GAD)
The deck width of the superstructure is 16.0m wide, which supports three lane carriageway
with a divided footpath on one side. However, considering future expansion provision the
superstructure has been designed considering four lane carriageway without footpath. RCC
cantilever type abutment with return wall and median wall has been proposed for the bridge.
Wall type pier with open foundation has been proposed as intermediate support. Provision
of two number of pin bearing with five numbers of Pot cum PTFE bearing is provided in the
superstructure to restrict the horizontal forces during seismic. Seismic stopper has been
provided in all pier cap and abutment cap as an additional protective measure for prevention
of dislodgement. (Refer GAD)
The detailed report of design calculation of individual element of bridges has been attached
in the following sections. The design of pile cap is on hold and it shall be issued following
the comments of the proof checker on pile and pile reactions.
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and
Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of
West Bengal
Abutment(Fx) for Bridge at chainage 121+255
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 5
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Job No. 4800197
DD-033
Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854
(Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Designed By: Checked By: Date
Bengal
Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018
1. General
This design note pertains to the design of abutment . Superstructure consists of
precast PSC girder,supported on POT PTFE bearing.
The substructure consists of RCC wall type abutment on open foundation.
Following components of substructure and foundation are designed

1 Abutmeftnt Shaft
2 Abutment cap
3 Dirt wall
4 Footing / pile cap / pile
5 Return wall
2. Codes and Specifications

Following codes have been used in the design
Sl.No. Code Year of Publication
1 IRC : 6 2017
2 IRC : 112 2011
3 IRC : 78 2014
3. Loads
1 Dead load (Due to self weight of superstructure, substructure, foundation and backfill weight)
2 Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) excluding wearing course due to crash barrier, footpath and railing
(if present)
3 Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) due to wearing course
4 Carriageway live load Future widening keeping in mind
Max P case
Max Mt case
5 Footpath Live Load (FPLL) (if footpath is present)
6 Earth pressure due to backfill
7 Buoyancy in HFL case
Wind load is not considered as it is not governing
4. Load Combinations for Limit State

Following Limit States are considered
A Ultimate Limit State (For verification of Equilibrium)

A-1 Basic Combination
B Ultimate Limit State (For verification of structural strength)

B-1 Basic Combination
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 6
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
DD-033
Bengal
C Serviceability Limit State

C-1 Rare Combination (For checking stress limits)
C-2 Quasi-permanent Combination (For checking crack width in RCC structures)
D Combination for Design of Foundation

D-1 Combination 1
D-2 Combination 2
Accidental combination is not considered for abutment
5. Design Philosophy
Design is done using limit state method
i. Base Pressure Check

Base pressure check is performed from load combinations of unfactored loads as mentioned in Cl. No. 706.1.
of IRC:78-2014. As mentioned in Note no.9 under Table 3.4 of IRC:6-2017, IRC:78 shall be used
for checking base pressure
ii. Design of Abutment shaft

Abutment shaft is designed as rectangular column subjected to axial load and biaxial bending
ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked using Fagus software
Basic combination is used for checking ULS strength. Rare combination is used for checking
stress. Quasi-permanent combination is used for checking crack width.
iii. Design of Footing

ULS design is done using Combination 1 while stress is checked using Combination 2.
Crack width is controlled by adjusting bar diameter and spacing.
iv. Design of Abutment Cap

The Abutment cap is reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel distributed equally at both faces
and in both directions. Cantilever/corbel action is checked in longitudinal direction for eccentricity of bearings
with repect to abutment centerline.
vi. Design of Dirt Wall

ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked
vii. Design of End Return Wall

A1_Fx-121+255_skew 7
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-
31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of
Designed By: Checked By: Date
West Bengal
1 Basic Design Data

1.1 Span and Cross section Data
C/C of expansion gap = 22.02 m (Sq.)
C/C of bearing = 19.49 m (Sq.)
Distance of bearing to expansion gap = 1.27 m (Sq.)
Expansion Gap = 0.03 m (Sq.)
C/C of expansion gap = 24.30 m (Sk.)
C/C of bearing = 21.50 m (Sk.)
Distance of bearing to expansion gap = 1.40 m (Sk.)
Expansion Gap = 0.03 m (Sk.)
Carriageway width = 16.00 m
Carriageway width considered for design = 16.00 m
Total width = 15.00 m
Footpath Width (Left side) = 0.00 m
Footpath Width (Left side) considered for design = 0.00 m
Footpath Width (Right side) = 0.00 m
Crash Barrier Width (Left side) = 0.50 m
Crash Barrier Width (Right side) = 0.50 m
Handrail Width (Left side) = 0.00 m
Handrail Width (Left side) considered for design = 0.00 m
Handrail Width (Right side) = 0.00 m
o
Skew Angle = 25.00 0.436 radians
cos q = 0.906307787
1.2 Superstructure Details
Type of Structure = Girder
Depth of Girder = 2.00 m
Depth of Deck Slab = 0.20 m
Depth of superstructure = 2.200 m
Spacing of girders = 3.000 m
No. of Girders = 5.00
Thickness of diaphragm = 0.600 m
Thickness of wearing coat = 0.100 m
Cross-slope = 0.030
Thickness of bearing = 0.200 m
Thickness of pedestal (minimum) = 0.150 m
Minimum thickness of wedge = 0.415 m
Thickness of nearest bearing+pedestal = 0.350 m
1.3 Material Data

Grade of concrete fck = M35
Design strength of concrete fcd = 15.63 MPa
Grade of steel fyk = Fe550
Design strength of steel fyd = 478.3 MPa
Density of concrete = 2.50 t/m3
Density of wearing course = 2.20 t/m3
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of concrete = 1.20E-05 /oC (Cl.215.4, IRC 6 2017)
Shrinkage strain = 2.0E-04 (Cl.217.3, IRC 6 2017)
Modulus of Elasticity of steel Es = 2.0E+05 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of concrete Ec = 3.2E+04 MPa
Mean axial tensile strength of concrete fctm = 2.8 MPa
Grade of concrete for pedestals/stoppers = 50 MPa
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 8
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
1.4 Typical Levels

Formation Level "FRL" = 63.850 m
Dirt wall level = 63.850 m
Bearing level = 61.170 m
Max. Abutment cap level "CTL" = 60.820 m
Stem top level = 59.970 m
Front Ground level "GL" = 59.500 m
Rock top Level = 57.200 m Put Rock top level below
Scour level considered for design = 56.040 m founding level for sandy soil
Footing top level = 59.000 m
Minimum Founding level = 57.200 m
Founding level (design) "FL" = 57.200 m
Highest flood level "HFL" = 59.350 m
Lowest Water level "LWL" = 57.200 m
1.5 Soil Parameters

Angle of Shear resistance"f" = 30 o
Density of Dry Backfill "gd" = 1.80 t/m3
3
Density of Submerged Backfill "gsub" = 1.00 t/m
Net Safe Bearing Capacity = 20.00 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (LWL) = 22.30 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (HFL) = 18.84 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (LWL) seismic case = 27.30 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (HFL) seismic case = 27.30 t/m2
Live load surcharge = 1.20 m
Type of soil = Medium Soil
Coefficient of friction between = 0.50
(Soil/Rock and concrete)
1.6 Abutment Dimensions (Square)

Length of abutment cap in L-L direction at top = 2.28 m
Length of abutment cap in L-L direction at bottom = 2.28 m
Width of abutment (sqr) ** Refer below sketch for dimension = 16.00 m 17.65 (skew)
Length of footing (sqr) convention in row 128 = 16.00 m 17.65 (skew)
Width of footing( SQr) = 4.76 m 5.255 (skew)
Width of heel(sqr) = 1.98 m 2.18468828 (skew)
Minimum footing thickness = 1.80 m
Heel thickness at root = 1.80 m
Toe thickness at root = 1.80 m
Stem top thickness(straight) = 0.80 m
Stem bottom thickness(straight) = 0.80 m
Dirtwall thickness = 0.30 m
Depth of abutment cap (Constant portion) = 0.85 m
Depth of abutment cap (Varying portion) = 0.00 m
Return Wall Thickness at top = 0.40 m
Return Wall Thickness at bottom = 0.40 m
Return Wall thickness at HFL = 0.40 m
Height of Uniform portion of return wall = 0.00 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg. upto HFL) = 0.40 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg. below HFL) = 0.40 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg. ) = 0.40 m
No. of return wall = 2
Horizontal eccentricity of return wall in transverse dirn. = 7.80 m
Horizontal eccentricity of backfill in transverse dirn. = 0.00 m
Horizontal distance of abutment shaft bottom from vertical face = 0.40 m
Horizontal distance of CG of abutment shaft from vertical face = 0.40 m
Transverse ecc. of CG of abut from foundation c.g. = 0.00 m
Provision of weep holes in abutment wall = Yes
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 9
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
For Piles
5.26
Dia of piles 1.20 m y
no. of piles 10 Yes
Pile cap in Long direction 4.76 m 0.88

x
Pile cap in Trans direction 16.00 m 16.00
Depth of pile cap 1.80 m 1.5 times of pile dia 3.6
orthgonal axis for pile co-ordinate in skew 3.972161
Dimension input format for skew abutment

0.30 1.30
FRL
63.850m
3.03
61.170m Bearing Lvl
CTL
2.28 0.85 60.820m
0.00
0.80
1.18 0.3
6.650 HFL 59.350m
GL 59.500m
0.80 FTL 59.000m
1.80 1.80 FL 57.200m
1.98 1.98 MSL 56.040m

4.76
Distance between bearing c/l and mid of shaft sec at bottom in long. dirn. = 0.01 m
C/l of bearing is to the right of c/l of shaft
Eccentricity Shaft c/l to fdn c/l = 0.01227091 m
1.7 Partial Safety Factors
Partial safety factor for relevant loads are presented here
(As per Annex B of IRC:6-2017)
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 10
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal

For Loads
Ultimate Limit State (For Verification of Equilibrium) (Table 3.1, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)
Basic Comb Seismic Comb
Load Overturnin Overturning or
Resisting Resisting
g or Sliding Sliding
Dead Load 1.05 0.95 1.05 1.0

SIDL (except surfacing) 1.05 0.95 1.05 1.0
SIDL (surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35 1.0
Live load and associated loads
1.5 0 - -
(Leading)
Live load and associated loads 1.15 0 0.2 0
(Accompanying)
Water Current - 0 1.0 -
Buoyancy 1.0 - 1.0 -
Earth Pressure 1.5 - 1.0 -
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 0 - -
Thermal Load (Leading) 1.5 0 - -
Thermal Load (Accompanying) 0.9 0 0.5 -
Seismic Effect (During service) - - 1.5 -
- - 0.75 -
Seismic Effect (During construction)
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 11
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
For Loads Unfactored load combinatins for verification of equilibrium as per IRC:78-2014
(For Verification of Equilibrium)
Resisting Resisting
Dead Load 1 1 1.00 1.0
SIDL (except surfacing) 1 1 1.00 1.0
SIDL (surfacing) 1 1 1.00 1.0
1 0 - -
(Leading)
1 0 1 0
(Accompanying)
Earth Pressure 1 - 1.0 -
Live Load Surcharge 1 0 1 -
Thermal Load (Leading) 1 0 1 -
Thermal Load (Accompanying) 1 0 1 -
- - 1 -
Ultimate Limit State (For

Verification of Structural Serviceability Limit State
(Table 3.2, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)
Strength)
Quasi-
Basic Seismic
Load Rare Comb permanent
Comb Comb
Comb
Dead Load 1.35 1.35 1 1
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1.35 1 1
SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1.75 1.2 1.2
Live load and associated loads 1.5 0 1 0

(Leading)
1.15 0.2 0.75 0
(Accompanying)
Water Current 1 1 1.0 1.0
Buoyancy 0.15 1 0.8 0
Earth Pressure 1.5 1 1 -
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 0.2 0.15 0.15
Seismic Effect (During service) - 1.5 1.0 -
- 0.75 0.6 0.5

A1_Fx-121+255_skew 12
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
Combination for Design of Foundation (Table 3.4, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)

Load Comb 1 Comb 2 Seismic Comb Quasi comb Rare Comb
Dead Load 1.35 1 1.35 1 1
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35 1 1
SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1 1.75 1.2 1.2
Live load and associated loads 1.5 1.3 0.2 0 1

(Leading)
1.5 1 0.2 0 0.75
(Accompanying)
1.5 1 1.35 1 1
Backfill (adding effect)
1.35 1 1.35 1 1
Backfill (relieving effect)
Water Current 1 1 1 0 1
Buoyancy (Base Pressure) 1 1 1 -
Buoyancy (Structural Design) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Earth Pressure 1.5 1.3 1 1 1

Live Load Surcharge 1.2 1 0.2 0 0.8
Thermal load 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6
Seismic Effect (During service) - - 1.5 0 0
- - 0.75 0 0
Unfactored Loads as per Cl. 706.1 of IRC:78-2014 has been considered for base pressure check
For Materials
Basic Seismic
Material
Comb Comb
Concrete 1.5 1.5
Reinforcing steel 1.15 1.15
1.8 Load Data

Dead Load
Total weight of superstructure = 559.0 t
Transverse eccentricity of DL from c/l of foundation = 0.00 m
SIDL
Excluding wearing course
Self weight of crash barrier = 1.0 t/m
Self weight of railing = 0 t/m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier (with footpath case) = 0.00 m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier (without footpath case) = 0.00 m
Transverse eccentricity of railing = 0.00 m
Total weight of footpath/services 0.00 t
Transverse eccentricity of footpath/services = 0.00 m
Wearing course 0.22 t/m2

Load intensity due to wearing course = 2.2 t/m2
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course (with footpath case) = 0.00 m
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 13
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
1.9 Bearing Data

Type of bearing = POT-PTFE
Ignore data of elastomeric bearing Not Applicable
=
Length (along traffic dirn.) l 250 mm
Width (perpendicular to traffic dirn.) b = 250 mm
Height of elastomeric bearing h0 = 80 mm
Thickness of steel plate ts = 4 mm
Clear Cover to Steel Plate (horozontal) c = 6 mm
Clear Cover to Steel Plate (vertical) he = 6 mm
No. Of steel plates n = 8 mm
Effective thickness of the elastomeric bearing heff = 36 mm
Shear Modulus G = 1 Mpa
No. of Bearing over abutment on support line n = 5
1.10 Clear Cover

Dirt Wall = 50 mm
Abutment Cap = 50 mm
Abutment Stem = 75 mm
Footing = 75 mm
1.11 Seismic Zone Factor

Seismic Zone = V
Importance Factor = 1.2
Response Reduction Factor = 3 Cl. 219.5, NOTE, IRC:6-2017)
Temperature variation = 30 oC
Condition of exposure = Moderate
Factor by which seismic force is increased for design of foundation in long = 1.35 (Cl.219.8, IRC 6 2017)
Factor by which seismic force is increased for design of foundation in Trans = 1
1.12 Sign Convention
Resisting moment (about toe) Positive
Overturning moment (about toe) Negative
Horizontal forces away from earth side Positive

Horizontal forces towards earth side Negative
Downward force Positive

Upward force/uplift Negative
In the transverse direction

Eccentricity towards footpath side Positive
Eccentricity away from footpath side Negative
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 14
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four- 033
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-
Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
2 Load Calculation from Superstructure
2.1 Dead Load of Superstructure

Reaction = 279.5 t
Total reaction on abutment = 279.5 t

Longitudinal moment = 3.8 t-m

Transverse Moment = 0.00 t-m
2.2 SIDL (crash barrier, railing, footpath) - excluding wearing course

With Footpath Case
Crash barrier weight = 48.6 t
Railing weight = 0 t
Footpath/services weight = 0.00 t
Total reaction on abutment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 24.3 t
Longitudinal moment (crash barrier) = 0.3303492 t-m

Longitudinal moment (railing) = 0 t-m
Longitudinal moment (footpath/services) = 0 t-m
Total Longitudinal Moment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0.3303492 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier = 0.00 m

Transverse Moment (crash barrier) = 0 t-m

Transverse Moment (railing) = 0.00 t-m

Transverse Moment (footpath/services) = 0 t-m
Total transverse moment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0.00 t-m
Without Footpath Case





A1_Fx-121+255_skew 15
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
2.3 SIDL (wearing course)
With Footpath Case
DL of wearing course = 80.19 t
Longitudinal moment (wearing course) = 0.5450762 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course = 0.0 m

Transverse Moment (wearing course) = 0 t-m

Transverse eccentricity of wearing course = 0m

Transverse Moment (wearing course) = 0.00 t-m
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 16
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
2.4 Summary of Loads from Superstructure

With Footpath Case
At Bearing Level
P ML MT HL HT
Load Item
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 279.5 3.8 0.0 0 0
SIDL (excluding w/c)
24.3 0.3303492 0 0 0
(with footpath case)
SIDL (w/c) (with
40.095 0.5450762 0 0 0
foothpath case
24.3 0.3303492 0.00 0 0
(without footpath case)
SIDL (w/c) (without
33.91585 0.461073 0.00 0 0
foothpath case
At Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

P ML MT HL HT
Load Item
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 279.5 3.8 0.0 0 0
24.3 0.3 0.0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (with
40.1 0.5 0.0 0 0
foothpath case
24.3 0.3 0.0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (without
33.9 0.5 0.0 0 0
foothpath case
At Foundation Bottom Level

ML (about MT(about
P HL HT
Load Item toe) footing c/l)
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 279.5 662.2 0.0 0 0 with respect to toe
24.3 57.6 0.0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (with
40.1 95.0 0.0 0 0
foothpath case
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 17
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by
Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-
3 Seismic Coefficient Calculation
T = Fundamental Time Period = 2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
D = Appropriate Dead Load of the Superstructure = 6877.90 KN

and percentage of Live Load in KN
F = Horizontal Force in KN required to be applied at the centre of the mass of the

superstructure for 1mm horizontal deflection at the top of the pier along the
considered direction of horizontal Force
Horizontal Force in Longitudinal Direction applied = 10 KN
L = Height of the Abutment above fixity Level including = 2.170 m

abutment cap
G = Grade of Concrete for Abutment = M35
E = Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete = 32000.0 Mpa
= 3.20E+06 t/m^2
b = width of abutment = 0.800 m

Cracked MOI factor = 1.000
I -L = Moment of Inertia of the Pier in long diretion = 0.753 m4
Shear Rating is zero
Deflection at the top of the abut in long. dir.
d1 = Deflection due to shear rating of bearing = 0.000 mm
d2 = FL3/3EI = 0.0014 mm
d = Total deflection of pier at top = 0.001 mm
F = Horizontal Force in KN reqd. for 1 mm = 7074.85 KN

deflection
T = Fundamental Time Period = 0.062 sec

2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient = 2.50 2.5

(depending upon fundamental time period T) Refer 219.5: Note of IRC 6:2017
Deflection at the top of the abut in trans dir.

I -T = Moment of Inertia of the Pier in trans diretion = 366.810 m4
d2 = FL3/3EI = mm

deflection

2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient = 1.04 #N/A

The project stretch is in seismic zone V

Longitudinal direction:
Type of Soil Medium Soil
Z = Zone factor = 0.36
I = Importance factor = 1.2
R = Response reduction factor = 3

Refer 219.5: Note of IRC 6:2017
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
18
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Transverse direction:

Ah = Horizontal Seismic Coefficient in long. dir. = 0.1800

(Z/2)*(S a /g)/(R/I) say 0.1800
Ah = Horizontal Seismic Coefficient in trans. dir. = 0.2252

(Z/2)*(S a /g)/(R/I) say 0.2252
A v = Vertical Seismic Coefficient (Clause 222.3 of latest amendments) = 0.1200

2/3 * A h say 0.1200
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
19
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from 033
KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
4.0 Calculation of Earth Pressure Co-efficient & Dynamic increament : (As per IRC-6:2017)
LWL Case:
Input : gsat = 2.0 t/m3
3
Density of Earth g dry = 1.8 t/m
gsub = 1.0 t/m3
Angle of internal friction of soil f = 30 deg = 0.524 radians
Angle of friction between wall and earthfill d = 20 deg = 0.349 radians
Angle which earth face makes with the vrtical a = 0 deg = 0.000 radians
Slope of earthfill b = 0 deg = 0 radians
Live Load surcharge = 1.20 m
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient ah = 0.18
Vertical seismic coefficient av = 0.12
Slope of earthfill i = 0 deg = 0 radians
Angle of earthface of wall with vertical a' = 0 deg = 0 radians
Width of abutment in dir. normal to traffic direction = 16.0 m
Skew angle = 25 deg = 0.436 radians
Calculation of earth pressure for normal case

63.850 ( Top of deck slab)
F1
F2 4.850 6.650 m
59.000 (Top of heel)
1.800 57.200 (Bottom of Foundation)/LWL

p2 p1
Ka = cos2(f-a) = 0.297
cos2a*cos(d+a)*[1+sqrt(sin(f+d)*sin(f-b)/cos(a-b)*cos(d+a)]2
Horizontal coefficient Kh=Kacos d = 0.279

Vertical coefficient Kv=Kasin d = 0.102
Kp = cos2(f+a) = 6.105
cos a*cos(d-a)*[1-sqrt(sin(f+d)*sin(f+b)/cos(a-b)*cos(d-a)]
2 2

For Abt Base
2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.279 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.603 t/m 0.603
Earth pressure p2 = 0.279 * 1.8 * 6.65 = 3.340 t/m2 2.436
Calculation of forces and moments at Bottom of foundation due to live load surcharge and
earth pressure
Force in the direction normal to the abutment Fl

Force in the direction parallel to the abutment Ft = F*sin 0
Moment about transverse axis of abutment Ml
Moment in the direction parallel to the abutment Mt = Ft*Lever arm
Abutment Base:
Sno. Item Pressure Width Height Force Fl Lever arm Ml Fv
2
(t/m ) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 4.850 51.630 51.630 2.425 125.203 0.5H
2 F2 2.436 17.65 4.850 104.288 104.288 2.037 212.435 0.42H 38.127
155.918 337.637 38.127
Foundation Bottom:
2
(t/m ) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 6.650 70.792 70.792 3.325 235.383 0.5H
2 F2 3.340 17.65 6.650 196.057 196.057 2.793 547.587 0.42H 71.677
266.849 782.971 71.677
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
20
Calculation of active earth pressure for dynamic increment
tan-1(ah/1+av) l = 0.159 radians

Ca = 0.467
tan-1(ah/1-av) l = 0.202 radians
Ca = 0.404
Governing value of Ca is greater of the two calculated above = 0.467
Horizontal coefficient Ch=Cacos d = 0.439

Vertical coefficient Cv=Casin d = 0.160
Dynamic increase in the horizontal direction =Ch-Kh = 0.160

Dynamic increase in the vertical direction =Cv-Kv = 0.058
Calculation of earth pressure for seismic case

63.850 (Top of deck slab)
F1 6.650 m
F2 4.850
57.200 (Bottom of foundation)

p2 p1
For Abt Base

2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.16 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.346 t/m 0.346
Calculation of forces and moments at Bottom of foundation due to dynamic increment

on live load surcharge and earth pressure
Force in the direction normal to the abutment Fl = F*cos 0

Moment in the direction parallel to the abutment Ml = Fl*Lever arm
Abutment Base:
Sno. Item Pressure Width Height Force F Fl Lever arm Ml Fv
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 4.850 51.630 51.630 2.425 125.203 H/2 0.000
2 F2 2.436 17.654 4.850 104.288 104.288 1.601 166.913 H/3 38.127
Dynamic increamnet component
1 F1 0.346 17.654 4.850 29.625 29.625 3.201 94.830 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 1.397 17.654 4.850 59.807 59.807 2.425 145.032 H/2 21.680
245.35 245.35 531.98 59.81
Foundation Bottom:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 6.650 70.792 70.792 3.325 235.383 H/2 0.000
2 F2 3.340 17.654 6.650 196.057 196.057 2.195 430.247 H/3 71.677
1 F1 0.346 17.654 6.650 40.620 40.620 4.389 178.281 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 1.915 17.654 6.650 112.410 112.410 3.325 373.763 H/2 40.749
419.88 419.88 1217.67 112.43
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
21
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from
5.0 Calculation of Earth Pressure Co-efficient & Dynamic increament : (As per IRC-6:2017))
HFL Case:

F1
F3 4.850 6.650 m
p3 p1 59.350 (HFL)
p4 p2
F2 0.350 2.150
F4
F5
p4 1.800 57.200 (Bottom of Foundation)/LWL
p5 p2
Ka = cos2(f-a) = 0.308
Above HFL
Horizontal coefficient Kh=Kacos d = 0.303 0.279
Vertical coefficient Kv=Kasin d = 0.053 0.102
Kp = cos2(f+a) = 4.143 6.105

cos2a*cos(d-a)*[1-sqrt(sin(f+d)*sin(f+b)/cos(a-b)*cos(d-a)]2

For Abt Base
2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.279 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.603 t/m 0.603
p2 = 0.303 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.654 t/m2 0.654
p4 = 0.303 * 1.8 * 4.5 = 2.454 t/m2 2.454
p5 = 0.303 * 1 * 2.15 = 0.651 t/m2 0.106
earth pressure

Abutment Base:
2
(t/m ) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 4.500 47.904 47.904 2.600 124.550 0.5H 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.65 0.350 4.041 4.041 0.175 0.707 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.260 17.65 4.500 89.771 89.771 2.240 201.087 0.42H 32.820
4 F4 2.454 17.65 0.350 15.163 15.163 0.175 2.654 0.5H 5.543
5 F5 0.106 17.65 0.350 0.327 0.327 0.116 0.038 0.33H 0.057
157.206 5.306 329.036 38.420
Foundation Bottom:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 4.500 47.904 47.904 4.400 210.778 0.5H 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.65 2.150 24.823 24.823 1.075 26.685 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.260 17.65 4.500 89.771 89.771 4.040 362.675 0.42H 32.820
4 F4 2.454 17.65 2.150 93.145 93.145 1.075 100.131 0.5H 34.053
5 F5 0.651 17.65 2.150 12.355 12.355 0.710 8.766 0.33H 2.161
267.998 11.300 709.034 69.034

(Ws / Ws-1) = 2
tan-1 ((ah/1+av)*(Ws / Ws-1)) l = 0.311 radians 17.81888891
Ca = 0.656
tan-1 ((ah/1-av)*(Ws / Ws-1)) l = 0.388 radians
Ca = 0.633
Above HFL
Governing value of Ca is greater of the two calculated above = 0.656 0.467
Horizontal coefficient Ch=Cacos d = 0.646 0.439

Vertical coefficient Cv=Casin d = 0.114 0.16
Dynamic increase in the horizontal direction =C h-Kh = 0.343 0.160
Dynamic increase in the vertical direction =Cv-Kv = 0.061 0.058
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
22
p1
F3
F1 6.650 m
p3 4.850 59.350 (HFL)
p4 F2 p2
F4
F5
p4 57.200 (Bottom of foundation)
p5 p2
For Abt Base

2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.16 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.346 t/m 0.346
p2 = 0.343 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.741 t/m2 0.741
p4 = 0.343 * 1.8 * 4.5 = 2.778 t/m2 2.778
p5 = 0.343 * 1 * 2.15 = 0.737 t/m2 0.12


Abutment Base:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 4.500 47.904 47.904 2.600 124.550 H/2 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.654 0.350 4.041 4.041 0.175 0.707 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.260 17.654 4.500 89.771 89.771 1.835 164.730 H/3 32.820
4 F4 2.454 17.654 0.350 15.163 15.163 0.175 2.654 0.5H 5.543
5 F5 0.106 17.654 0.350 0.327 0.327 0.116 0.038 0.33H 0.057

1 F1 0.346 17.654 4.500 27.487 27.487 3.320 91.257 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 0.741 17.654 0.350 4.579 4.579 0.231 1.058 0.66H 0.000
3 F3 1.296 17.654 4.500 51.479 51.479 2.600 133.845 H/2 18.661
4 F4 2.778 17.654 0.350 17.165 17.165 0.175 3.004 H/2 6.222
5 F5 0.120 17.654 0.350 0.371 0.371 0.175 0.065 H/2 0.134
258.29 258.29 521.91 63.44
Foundation Bottom:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 4.500 47.904 47.904 4.400 210.778 H/2 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.654 2.150 24.823 24.823 1.075 26.685 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.260 17.654 4.500 89.771 89.771 3.635 326.318 H/3 32.820
4 F4 2.454 17.654 2.150 93.145 93.145 1.075 100.131 0.5H 34.053
5 F5 0.651 17.654 2.150 12.355 12.355 0.710 8.766 0.33H 2.161

1 F1 0.346 17.654 4.500 27.487 27.487 5.120 140.733 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 0.741 17.654 2.150 28.121 28.121 1.419 39.904 0.66H 0.000
3 F3 1.296 17.654 4.500 51.479 51.479 4.400 226.508 H/2 18.661
4 F4 2.778 17.654 2.150 105.442 105.442 1.075 113.350 H/2 38.223
5 F5 0.737 17.654 2.150 13.987 13.987 1.075 15.036 H/2 2.487
494.51 494.51 1208.21 128.40
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
23
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Job No. 4800197 DD-033
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the Designed By: Checked By: Date
state of West Bengal
6 LIVE LOAD CALCULATION (NORMAL CASE)
Live Load Calculation
Following live load cases are considered

1 1 lane 70R-Wheeled
2 1 Lane Class A
3 3 Lane Class A
4 1 lane 70R-Wheeled + 1 Lane Class A
Reaction due to DL of superstructure = 279.5 t

Reaction due to SIDL exl w/c = 24.3 t
Reaction due to SIDL due to w/c = 40.10 t
Live Load
Max Reaction Case i/c Lane deduction factor/congetion factor Without Impact
P = 136.5 t eL 0.9
ML = 126 t-m
MT = 23 t-m
HT = 0
Max MT Case
P = 98 t eL 0.918367347
ML = 90 t-m
MT = 412.8
HT = 0
Max Reaction Case

Class A 55.4 t Class A 100 t
Bearing type is POT-PTFE Lane Deduction factor 0.8
u (Rg) 17.19475 t For Seismic deuction 0.2

u (Rq) 6.825 t
Fh 25 t
Normal Case
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) 0.98025 t
Long force 36.5 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 36.51975 t
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 24
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Seismic Case
u (Rq) 1.365 t
Fh 5t
Trans Seismic Long Seismic
u(Rq+Rg) = 21.05975 t
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) -13.5598 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 21.05975 t
Long force 21.05975 t
Max Moment Case


u (Rq) 4.9 t
Fh 22.77 t
Normal Case
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) 0.67525 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 33.4798 t
Seismic Case
u (Rq) 0.98 t
Fh 22.77 t Remember to remove lane deduction from here
u(Rq+Rg) = 29.55975 t
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) 4.59525 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 29.5598 t
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 25
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the
7 Seismic Forces at Bearing Level from Superstructure
Following live load cases are considered ang_seis

1 1 lane 70R-Wheeled 0
2 1 Lane Class A
3 3 Lane Class A
Reaction due to self weight of superstructure = 279.5 t

Total SIDL reaction ( Excluding wc) = 24.3 t
Total SIDL reaction ( wc) = 40.095
Horizontal seismic coefficient (long.) ahl = 0.180
Horizontal seismic coefficient (trans.) aht = 0.225
Seismic force on DL + SIDL , long. Dirn. = 61.9 t
Seismic force on DL + SIDL , trans. Dirn.-Max P = 77.4 t
Seismic force on DL + SIDL , vert. Dirn. = 41.3 t
r1 = Full seismic force in longitudinal direction = ahl*(DL+SIDL)

r2 = Full seismic force in transverse direction = aht*(DL+SIDL+Appropriate LL)
r3 = Full seismic force in vertical direction = av*(DL+SIDL+Appropriate LL)
3 Max MT case
Live Load Reaction on abutment = 19.60 t Max MT Case Reaction
Full Design Seismic Forces

r1 = 61.9 t
r2 = 81.8 t
r3 = 43.6 t
Longitudinal Seismic Case

Seismic force at bearing level (Longitudinal) = 2*r1 = 123.8 t
Seismic force at bearing level (Transverse) = 0.3r2 = 24.6 t
HL Seismic = 123.80 t
HT Seismic = 24.55 t
Transverse Seismic Case

Seismic force at bearing level (Longitudinal) = 2*0.3r1 = 37.1 t
Seismic force at bearing level (Transverse) = r2 = 81.8 t
Vertical Seismic force at bearing level = 0.3*r3 = 13.1 t
Vertical Seismic Case

Vertical Seismic force at bearing level = r3 = 43.6 t
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 26
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
4 Max Rxn case
Live Load Reaction on abutment = 27.30 t Max P Case Reaction

r1 = 61.9 t
r2 = 83.6 t
r3 = 44.5 t



Summary of Seismic Forces at Bearing Level From Superstructure
Longitudinal Seismic
Pmax Pmin ML MT HL Seismic HT Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
3 lane Class A 13.09 -13.09 0.18 51.37 123.80 24.55 Max MT
1 lane 70R-W + 1 lane Class A 13.36 -13.36 0.18 53.38 123.80 25.07 Max P
Transverse Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
Vertical Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 27
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
At Bearing Level SL1 Max P Case

Longitudinal Seismic SL2 Max MT Case
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.18 53.38 123.80 25.07
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.18 51.37 123.80 24.55
Transverse Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.18 177.94 37.14 83.58
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.18 171.22 37.14 81.84
Vertical Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 44.54 -44.54 0.61 53.38 37.14 25.07
SL2 43.62 -43.62 0.59 51.37 37.14 24.55

Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 268.9 107.8 123.80 25.07
SL2 13.09 -13.09 268.9 104.6 123.80 24.55
Transverse Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 80.8 359.3 37.14 83.58
SL2 13.09 -13.09 80.8 348.8 37.14 81.84
Vertical Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 44.54 -44.54 81.2 107.8 37.14 25.07
SL2 43.62 -43.62 81.2 104.6 37.14 24.55

ML due ML due
to HL to P MT (about ML (about HL HT
Pmax Pmin
Load Case (about (about footing c/l) footing c/l) Seismic Seismic
toe) toe)
t t t-m t-m t-m t t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 -491.5 -31.7 152.9 491.5 123.80 25.07
SL2 13.09 -13.09 -491.5 -31.0 148.8 491.5 123.80 24.55
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 28
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
Transverse Seismic
ML due ML due
ML (about
to HL to P MT (about HL HT
Pmax Pmin footing c/l)
Load Case (about (about footing c/l) Seismic Seismic
due to HL
toe) toe)
SL1 13.36 -13.36 -147.5 -31.7 509.8 147.5 37.14 83.58
SL2 13.09 -13.09 -147.5 -31.0 499.2 147.5 37.14 81.84
Vertical Seismic
ML due ML due
Pmax Pmin
toe) toe)
SL1 44.54 -44.54 -147.5 -105.5 152.9 147.5 37.14 25.07
SL2 43.62 -43.62 -147.5 -103.3 149.8 147.5 37.14 24.55
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 29
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
(Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal
SUMMARY:
Earth Pressure: Live Load Surcharge:
At Abutment Base: At Abutment Base:

Dimension of Toe+Abutment Stem = -2.95
Normal Case Normal Case
ML due ML due
ML due to to P ML due to P
P HL P HL
HL about to HL about
toe toe
t t t-m t-m t t t-m t-m
LWL 38.1 104.3 212.4 -112.5 LWL 0.0 51.6 125.2 0.0
HFL 38.4 105.3 203.8 -113.3 HFL 0.0 51.9 125.3 0.0
Seismic Case Seismic Case

ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 59.8 164.1 311.9 -176.4 LWL 0.0 81.3 220.0 0.0
HFL 63.4 174.3 304.3 -187.1 HFL 0.0 84.0 217.6 0.0
At Foundation Bottom: At Foundation Bottom:

ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 71.7 196.1 547.6 -211.4 LWL 0.0 70.8 235.4 0.0
HFL 69.0 195.3 471.6 -203.6 HFL 0.0 72.7 237.5 0.0

ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 112.4 308.5 804.0 -331.7 LWL 0.0 111.4 413.7 0.0
HFL 128.4 366.2 790.1 -378.8 HFL 0.0 128.3 418.1 0.0
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 30
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM
113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterje 14-12-2018
10 Calculation of Forces on Abutment and Foundation
Abutment dimensions (square) are shown below
0.3 1.30
0.4 3.03
2.28 0.85 4.5
c 0.80 0.00
1.18
a HFL
0.97
0.35
0.80
0.00 d
0.00 1.80
1.80
1.98 1.98
4.76
C.G. Cl of Fdn
Width of abutment b = 16.00 m Width of pilecap = 16.00 m
Return Wall is on 2 side b/cos q = 17.6540467 m b/cos q = 17.654047 m
Normal Case
Moments about c/l of foundation
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
31
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
"e" fro mC/L
Horizontal Lever Arm Hor.Lever Arm ML about ML about ML about
Component Weight ML of
from shaft at bottom c/l from toe toe C/L C/L
foundation
t m t-m m t-m m t-m t-m
Standard Dirt Wall Bracket 5.96 1.566 9.3 3.95 23.5 -1.85 -11.0 0.0
Dirt Wall 40.12 1.432 57.5 3.82 153.0 -1.43 -57.5 0.0
Abutment Cap
94.19 0.441 41.6 2.82 266.0 -0.44 -41.7 0.0
(uniform)
Abutment Cap
0.00 0.000 0.0 2.82 0.0 -0.04 0.0 0.0
(varying)
Abutment Shaft 34.26 0.000 0.0 2.38 81.6 0.00 0.0 0.0
Total 174.5 108.3 524.2 -110.3 0.0
Hor. eccentricity of weight of substructure from c/l of bearing = 0.62 m
Width of abutment shaft at HFL = 0.8 m

3
Voume of abutment shaft submerged in water = 4.5 m
Buoyancy on abutment shaft = -4.48 t
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy about toe = -10.7 t-m
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy about C/l of foundation = 0.0 t-m
Seismic Case
Weight Full Design Seismic Forces
Component
t r1 r2 r3
Dirt Wall Bracket 6.0 1.1 1.3 0.7
Dirt Wall 40.1 7.2 9.0 4.8
Abutment Cap
94.2 17.0 21.2 11.3
(uniform)
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(varying)
Abutment Shaft 34.3 6.2 7.7 4.1
Foundation 378.4 68.1 85.2 45.4
θ is skew angle Put % of Exposed pile cap where seismic force to be considered 1
Longitudinal Seismic C/L of abutment shaft C/L of foundation

Horizontal
HL Horizontal Lever Vert. Lever
ML due to Lever Arm Vert. Lever Arm from ML due to ML due to
(r1*cosθ+0.3r HT (r1*sinθ+0.3r2*cosθ) V (0.3r3) Arm from shaft Arm from ML due to V MT MT
Component HL from shaft shaft bottom HL V
2*sinθ) c/l shaft bottom
c/l
t t t m m t-m t-m t-m m m t-m t-m t-m
Dirt Wall Bracket 1.1 0.4 0.2 1.57 4.6 5.0 0.3 1.9 -2 6.42 7 0 3 Match Line
Dirt Wall 7.2 2.7 1.4 1.43 3.3 24.1 2.1 9.0 -1 5.14 37 -2 14
Abutment Cap
17.0 6.4 3.4 0.44 1.4 23.7 1.5 8.9 20
(uniform) 0 3.20 54 -2
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
(varying) 0 2.77 0 0
Abutment Shaft 6.2 2.3 1.2 0.00 0.5 3.0 0.0 1.1 0 2.29 14 0 5
Foundation 68.1 25.6 13.6 0 0.90 61 0 23
Total at shaft 31.4 11.8 6.3 55.7 3.9 20.9 174 -4 65
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
32
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Vert. Lever
Hor.Lever Arm from Arm from
ML due to HL (about toe) ML due to V (about toe) MT
toe foundation
bottom
m m t-m t-m t-m
3.95 6.4 6.9 0.8 2.6
3.82 5.1 37.1 5.5 13.9
2.82 3.2 54.2 9.6 20.3
2.38 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.38 2.3 14.1 2.9 5.3
112.2 18.9 42.1
Transverse Seismic C/L of foundation

Horizontal
(0.3r1*cosθ+r HT (0.3r1*sinθ+r2*cosθ) V (0.3r3) Arm from shaft Arm from ML due to V MT MT
c/l
Dirt Wall Bracket 0.3 1.3 0.2 1.57 4.6 1.5 0.3 6.2 -1.85 6.42 2.0645304 -0.396908 8.608161719
Match Line
Dirt Wall 2.2 9.0 1.4 1.43 3.3 7.2 2.1 30.1 -1.43 5.14 11.124082 -2.0706088 46.38241018
Abutment Cap
5.1 21.2 3.4 0.44 1.4 7.1 1.5 29.6 67.75958291
(uniform) -0.44 3.20 16.251056 -1.5005279
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
(varying) -0.04 2.77 0 0
Abutment Shaft 1.8 7.7 1.2 0.00 0.5 0.9 0.0 3.7 0.00 2.29 4.2269164 -0.0016324 17.62433682
Foundation 20.4 85.2 13.6 0.00 0.90 18.388296 0 76.67090969
Total at shaft 29.9 39.3 6.3 16.7 3.9 69.6 52 -4 217
Vert. Lever
Hor.Lever Arm from
Arm from ML due to HL ML due to V MT
bearing c/l
shaft bottom
m m t-m t-m t-m
3.95 6.4 2.1 0.8 8.6
3.82 5.1 11.1 5.5 46.4
2.82 3.2 16.3 9.6 67.8
2.38 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.38 2.3 4.2 2.9 17.6
33.7 18.9 140.4
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
33
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Vertical Seismic C/L of foundation

Horizontal
HT ML due to Lever Arm Vert. Lever Arm from ML due to ML due to
(0.3r1*cosθ+0 V (r3) Arm from shaft Arm from ML due to V MT MT
Component (0.3r1*sinθ+0.3r2*cosθ) HL from shaft shaft bottom HL V
.3r2*sinθ) c/l shaft bottom
c/l
Match Line
Dirt Wall 2.2 2.7 4.8 1.43 3.3 7.2 6.9 9.0 -1.43 5.14 11.124082 -6.9020294 13.91472305
Abutment Cap
5.1 6.4 11.3 0.44 1.4 7.1 5.0 8.9 20.32787487
(uniform) -0.44 3.20 16.251056 -5.0017596
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
(varying) -0.04 2.77 0 0
Abutment Shaft 1.8 2.3 4.1 0.00 0.5 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.00 2.29 4.2269164 -0.0054413 5.287301046
Foundation 20.4 25.6 45.4 0.0 0.90 18.388296 0 23.00127291
Total at shaft 9.4 11.8 20.9 16.7 13.0 20.9 52 -13 65
Vert. Lever
Hor.Lever Arm from
bearing c/l
shaft bottom
m m t-m t-m t-m
3.95 6.4 2.1 2.8 2.6
3.82 5.1 11.1 18.4 13.9
2.82 3.2 16.3 31.9 20.3
2.82 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.38 2.3 4.2 9.8 5.3
33.7 62.9 42.1
Summary of Forces at Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

Normal Case
LWL
Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0 0 0
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0 0 0
Buoyancy -4.48 -4.48 0 0 0 0
Seismic Case
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 51.8 20.9 31.4 11.8
Substr.
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
34
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 51.8 20.9 31.4 11.8
Substr.
Transverse Seismic
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 12.8 69.6 29.9 39.3
Substr.
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 12.8 69.6 29.9 39.3
Substr.
Vertical Seismic
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.9 -20.9 3.7 20.9 9.4 11.8
Substr.
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 108.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.9 -20.9 3.7 20.9 9.4 11.8
Substr.
End of Summary of Forces at Abutment Shaft Bottom Level
Calculation of Weight of foundation

Rectangular Part
Volume = 151.344 m3
Weight = 378.36 t
Trapezoidal Part
Volume = 0.0 m3
Weight = 0t
3
Total Volume of foundation = 151.3 m
Total Weight of foundation = 378.36 t
Buoyancy force on foundation = -151.344 t
Lever arm from toe = 2.38 m

Moment due to wt. Of foundation about toe = 901.0 t-m
Moment due to buoyancy force on foundation about toe ML = -360.4 t-m
Moment about c/l of foundation = 0.0 t-m
Moment due to buyoyancy about c/l of foundation = 0.0 t-m
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
35
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Calculation for Return Wall
ML about
Hor.Lever Arm from toe
Weight ML about toe e about c/l of C/L of
Portion in L-L dirn.
foundation foundation
t m t-m m t-m
a 8.5 4.36 37.3 -2.0 -16.9 -1.7560952
b 2.5 3.37 8.5 -1.0 -2.5
c 0.0 3.57 0.0 -1.2 0.0
d 0.0 4.10 0.0 -1.7 0.0
Total 11.1 45.8 -19.4
Horizontal eccentricity of CG of return wall from toe in longitudinal direction = 4.1 m

Transverse Moment due to wt. of return wall MT = 86.3 t-m
Submerged height of return wall in HFL case upto foundation top level = 0.35 m
Submerged volume of return wall = 0.61 m3
Buoyancy force on return wall = -0.61 t
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy force on return wall about toe = -2.5 t-m
Transverse moment due to buoyancy about centerline of footing = -4.7713592 t-m
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy force on return wall about C/L of foundation = 1 t-m
Calculation for Backfill Weight

Width of backfill in transverse direction (Skew) = 16.8 m
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
36
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
LWL
ML about
t m t-m m t-m
a 116.8 4.36 509.6 -2.0 -231.5
b 34.6 3.37 116.8 -1.0 -34.4
c 0.00 3.57 0.0 -1.2 0.0
d 0.00 4.10 0.0 -1.7 0.0
Total 151.4 626.4 -265.9
HFL
ML about
t m t-m m t-m
a 112.1 4.36 489.2 -2.0 -222.2
b 29.1 3.37 98.1 -1.0 -28.9
c 0.00 3.57 0.0 -1.2 0.0
d 0.00 4.10 0.0 -1.7 0.0
Total 141.2 587.3 -251.1
Summary of Forces at Foundation Bottom Level
Normal Case
LWL C/L of foundation
ML due to P
Pmax Pmin ML due to HL (about toe) MT HL HT
Component (about toe) Pmax Pmin HL HT ML Mt
t t t-m t-m t-m t t t t t t t-m t-m
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0 0 -110.3 0.0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.36 378.36 0 0 0.0 0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0 0 -19.4 0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 151.4 151.4 0 0 -265.9 0
HFL C/L of foundation

ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Buoyancy on substr. -4.48 -4.48 0.0 -10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 -4.48 -4.48 0 0 0.0 0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.36 378.36 0 0 0 0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0.0 -360.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 -151.344 -151.344 0 0 0.0 0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0 1.1
wall. -0.61 -0.61 0 0 0
Backfill Wt. 141.2 141.2 0.0 587.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.2 141.2 0 0 -251.1 0
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
37
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Seismic Case
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 -112.2 -18.9 42.1 31.4 11.8 19.9 -19.9 99.5 37.3 170 65
Substr.
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 151.4 151.4 0.0 0.0 -265.9 0.0

ML due to P
Component (about toe) P Pmin HL HT ML Mt
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 -112.2 -18.9 42.1 31.4 11.8
Substr. 19.9 -19.9 99.5 37.3 170 65
Buoyancy on substr. -4.5 -4.5 0.0 -10.67 0.0 0.0 0.0 -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0 -360.4 0 0 0 -151.3 -151.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0
wall. -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.2 141.2 0.0 0.0 -251.1 0.0
Transverse Seismic
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 -33.7 -18.9 42.1 29.9 39.3
Substr. 19.9 -19.9 29.9 124.5 48 217
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 151.4 151.4 0.0 0.0 -265.9 0.0
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
38
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.3 -6.3 -33.7 -18.9 42.1 29.9 39.3
Substr. 19.9 -19.9 29.9 124.5 48.1 217.0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0 -360.40 0 0 0 -151.3 -151.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0
wall. -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.2 141.2 0.0 0.0 -251.1 0.0
Vertical Seismic
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.9 -20.9 -33.7 -62.9 42.1 9.4 11.8
Substr. 66.3 -66.3 29.9 37.3 39 65
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 151.4 151.4 0.0 0.0 -265.9 0.0

ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 174.5 174.5 0.0 524.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.5 174.5 0.0 0.0 -110.3 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.9 -20.9 -33.7 -62.9 42.1 9.4 11.8
Substr. 66.3 -66.3 29.9 37.3 38.8 65.1
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0.00 -360.40 0 0 0 -151.3 -151.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 11.1 11.1 0.0 45.8 86.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 -19.4 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0
wall. -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Backfill Wt. 151.4 151.4 0.0 626.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 141.2 141.2 0.0 0.0 -251.1 0.0
End of Summary of Forces at Foundation Bottom Level
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
39
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D
from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
12 DESIGN OF ABUTMENT SHAFT
T-T
As'
ML
L-L
0.8
MT
As
17.65m sk
Provision of Reinforcement
T direction
2
Compression Face 140 No. 12 mm dia bar AsL' = 15833.6 mm
2
Tension Face 140 No. 20 mm dia bar AsL = 43982.3 mm
0 No. 20 mm
Spacing in Tansverse direction = 126 mm < 200.0 OK
L direction
2
2
Dia of Distribution Reinforcement = 12 mm

Effective Cover d' = 97 mm
Percentage of vertical reinforcement in shaft = 0.48% > 0.30% Ok Cl. 710.3.2,IRC:78-2014
P ML MT eL = ML/P eT = MT/P (eT/h )/(e (eT/he

eq
Check for P q)/(eL Check
t t-m t-m m m L/beq)
/beq)
Max P Case 909.8 929.4 34.5 1.02 0.04 0.81 1.23 Check interaction eqn.
P can be ignored
Min P Case 215.4 453.4 15.7 2.10 0.07 0.76 1.32 Check interaction eqn.
P can be ignored
Max ML
761.8 1030.6 197.6 1.35 0.26 4.19 0.24 Check interaction eqn.
Case P can be ignored
Min ML
234.9 451.9 0.0 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 No further check reqd
ULS and SLS Checks of Abutment Section
ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked using AdSec 8.2 (FAGUS software).
The output summary is attached in Appendix 1.
Under ULS, moment capacity of the section is checked.
Under SLS, stress and crack width are checked.
Load case 1 to 4 are for ULS

Load case 5 to 8 are for SLS stress check from Rare combination
Load case 9 to 12 are for SLS stress check from Quasi-permanent combination
ULS CASE FOR Fagus
P MT=MY ML=MZ HL HT max

LOAD CASE
kN kN-m kN-m
1 Max P Case 0.0 345.0 9294.3
2 Min P Case 0.0 156.7 4533.8 4312.050991
3 Max ML Case 0.0 1976.3 10306.1 4198.648991
4 Min ML Case 0.0 0.0 4519.4
Maximum M/MU( As per Fagus CHECK) = 0.83

Shear
Dia of links 10 mm
No. 90
Spacing 200 mm
total area mm^2/m 35342.91735
For Shear ( as per Fagus check = 0.40
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
40
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
033
Summary of Critical Load Cases from Rare Combination
Permissible Stress for Concrete = 0.48fck = 16.8 MPa

Permissible Stress for Steel = 0.6fyk = -330 MPa
P ML MT
t t-m t-m
Max P Case 655.5 630.9 23.0
Min P Case 173.8 312.1 0.0

Min ML
173.8 312.1 0.0
Case
Max ML
655.5 630.9 23.0
Case
SLS CASE FOR Fagus_STRESS_CHECK

P MT=MY ML=MZ
LOAD CASE
kN kN-m kN-m
5 Max P Case 6555.2 230.0 6308.8

6 Min P Case 1738.5 0.0 3121.3
7 Min ML Case 1738.5 0.0 3121.3
8 Max ML Case 6555.2 230.0 6308.8
Maximum compressive stress in concrete = 2.9 Mpa

Minimum tensile stress in steel = -35 Mpa
Summary of Critical Load Cases from Quasi-permanent Combination (for crack width check)
Condition of exposure Moderate

Limiting Crack Width = 0.3 mm Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011
P ML MT
t t-m t-m
Max P Case 526.4 325.6 0.0
Min P Case 173.8 312.1 0.0

Min ML
173.8 312.1 0.0
Case
Max ML
526.4 325.6 0.0
Case
SLS CASE FOR OASYS_CRACK WIDTH_CHECK

P MT=MY ML=MZ
LOAD CASE
kN kN-m kN-m
9 Max P Case 5264.3 0.0 3255.7
10 Min P Case 1738.5 0.0 3121.3
11 Min ML Case 1738.5 0.0 3121.3
12 Max ML Case 5264.3 0.0 3255.7
Maximum crackwidth coming out from Fagus CHECK= 0.02 mm
Distribution Reinforcement
Distribution reinforcement = 0.25 % of gross area Cl. 710.3.4, IRC:78-2014
Distribution reinforcement per meter height = 2000 mm2/m
2
Distribution reinforcement per meter height on each face = 1000 mm /m
Provide 12 mm dia bars @90 mm c/c on each face
2
Ast,provided per meter height = 1256.6 mm /m OK
Minimum area of horizontal reinf. per meter = 25 % of Area of vertical reinf. or 0.001Ac whichever is greater
2
= 800.00 mm /m Cl. 16.3.2, IRC:112-2011
2
Total area of horizontal reinf. provided per meter = 2513.3 mm /m OK
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
41
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
033
Dia. Of bar = max(1/4*dia of vertical bar, 8mm)

= 8 mm Cl. 16.3.2, IRC:112-2011
> 12 mm OK
Maximum spacing = 200 mm 12 times the minimum diameter of
= 144 mm vertical bar
= 800 mm Least dimension of the column
> 90 mm OK
DUCTILE DETAILING FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE

AS PER SECTION 17 OF IRC:112-2011
Dimensions of abutment = 17.7m sk X 0.8
Maximum Axial force in seismic condition, NED = 8925.4 kN

Normalised Axial force = NED
Acfck
= 0.02
< 0.08
Confinement of compression zone not required
Grade of Steel = 550 MPa
Grade of Concrete = 35 MPa
fyd = 478.3 MPa
fcd = 15.6 MPa
Long. Reinf. Provided in abutment
140 No. bars 12 mm dia

Total Asl = 59815.92412 mm2
Ac = 14123237.36 mm2
Reinforcement ratio of long. Reinf.
ρL = 0.004
2
Area of confined core ACC = 11377630.4 mm
ωw,req = 0.0083
For rectangular sections
Minimum confining reinforcement
ωwd.c ≥ max(ωw,req ; 0.12)
ωwd.c ≥ 0.12
Provide dia of confining reinf. = 12 mm
Spacing of confining reinforcement, SL (Cl. 17.2.1.3 of IRC:112-2011)
SL1 = 5*Dia of smallest longitudinal bar = 100 mm

SL2 = 1/5th of dia of core upto hoop c/l = 130 mm
Minimum spacing of confining reinforcement = 100 mm
Provide spacing SL = 100 mm

OK
For rectangular section in one direction
Volumetric ratio of hoop reinforcement relative to concrete core
2
Area of hoop bar Asp = 7916.8 mm
ρw = Asw
SL.b
= 0.004
Confining reinforcement provided

ωwd = ρwfyd/fcd
= 0.137 OK
No. of links = 70 No.
Spacing in transverse direction = 126 mm
Provide 12 mm dia hoops at spacing @100 mm c/c
Minimum Spacing in transverse direction = 225 mm 1/3 of the least domension of

= 200 mm concrete core or 200mm
OK
Depth of section = 800 mm
Distance from the point of maximum design moment to the
point where design moment is 80% of the max moment = 434.04 mm
Design length of potential plastic hinge Lh = 800.00 mm
Therefore confining reinforcement will be provided over a length of = 800.00 mm above founding top level
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
42
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. LOUIS BERGER DD-033
West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
Abutment design
FAGUS
SECTION PROPERTIES
RESULTS
43
UR :
For Moment: 0.84 OK

For Shear: 0.40 OK governed by concrete
STRESS RESULTS
Stress in concrete -5.7

Stress in steel 202 Mpa
CRACK CHECK
44
LOUIS BERGER Document No.
Detailed Engineering in connection with Rehabiliation and Upgradation to

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-2A) of
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal on EPC Mode Designed by: Checked by Date
12.0 Design of Stem
Length of stem 17.65 m
Thickness of stem bottom 0.8 m
Maximum Vertical axial force at stem bottom 1 T
Gross area of stem at bottom 14.12 m2
Axial stress in wall 0.00 mpa
Grade of concrete M 35
Axial stress is less than 0.1fck 3.5
Hence design as cantilever slab no need to check slanderness ratio
Height of the wall 5.076
Effective length factor with elastomeric bearing in top 1.3
Thickness of wall 0.8
Slanderness ratio 8.25
Design as slender column
Design compressive strength 15.61
Design force summary
Case ULS 1 ULS 2 SLS Rare 1 SLS QP 1 SLS Rare 2 SLS QP 2 Seismic 1 Seismic 2
P (T) 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
ML (T-M) 1030 0 631 326 1 1 1 1
MT (T-M) 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
V (T) 431 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Material property
Grade of reinforcement = 550
fyk = 550 Mpa
Modulus of elasticity Es = 200000 Mpa
Grade of concrete = M35
fck = 35
fcm = 45
Ecm = 32308 Mpa
Fyd = 440 Mpa
Clear cover = 75 mm
Ecm for short tem loading = 32308 Mpa
Ecm for long term loading = 16154 Mpa
fcteff = 2.77 Mpa
fcd = 15.61 Mpa
Creep factor φ = 1
εcu2 = 0.0035 mm
Permissible compressive stress in concrete

SLS rare = 16.8 Mpa
SLS QP = 12.6 Mpa
Permissible tensile stress in reinforcement

SLS rare = 330 Mpa
SLS QP = 330 Mpa
Permissible crack width = 0.3 mm
A1_Fx-121+255_skew_repaired 45

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
800
1000
ULS Capacity check
Section Sec 1 Sec 2
MED (T-M) 58 0.1
b (mm) 1000 1000
D (mm) 800 800
d (mm) 715 717
φ1 (mm) 20 16
s1 (mm) 125 125
φ2 (mm) 0 0
s2 (mm) 150 150
Ast (mm2) 2513 1608
Xumax (mm) 317 318
Xu (mm) Xu = (0.87*fyk*Ast)/(0.36*fck) 95 61
Check 1 OK OK
Astcal (mm2) Astcal =M/0.87*fyk*(d'-0.416 Xu) 1806 2
Check 2 OK OK
Ast min As per cl 16.5.1.1 IRC-112 937 939
Check 3 Ok Ok
ΔFd (T) 12.21 0.00
MED/Z + ΔFd 98.6 0.1
MRD (T-M) MRD = 0.87*fyk*Ast*(d-0.416 Xu) 81.21 53.23
Check 4 OK OK
MRD/Z 120 77
Check 5 Ok Ok 0.82011
Distribution reinforcement 0.2*Ast = 502.7
Provided distibution reinforcement
12 φ 100 C/C 1131.0 mm2
Ok
Secondary transverse reinforcement 503 mm2
12 φ 100 C/C 1131 mm2
Ok

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Check for shear Check for maximum shear capacity
Section section 1 Section 2 Section Section 1 Section 2
VED 24 0 VED 24 0
β 1 1 b 1000 1000
βVED 24 0 deff 715 717
deff 715 717 z 643.5 645.3
b 1000 1000 αcw 1.00 1
k k=min(1+sqrt(200/d),2) 1.53 1.53 ν1 0.53 0.53
VRDmax
ρ=min((Ast/b/deff),0.0
=αcw*b*z*
2)
ρ 0.0035 0.0022 VRDmax v1*fcd/2 267 268
νmin=0.031k^(3/2)*fck
νmin 0.347 0.346 Check 7 Ok Ok
σcp 0.00 0 θactual 2.62 0.00
VRDC VRDC=(max(((0.12*k*( 27.91 24.84 θadopted 45° 45°
ΔFd (T) =
0.5*Ved*co
Check 6 Ok Ok ΔFd (T) tθ 12.2 0.0
SLS Stress check

sec 1 sec 2 Section 1 Section 2
Load comb Rare QP Rare QP Creep coefficient φ 1 1
MED (T-M) 36 18 0 0 Mst = Mrare-MQP 17 0
b (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 Eceff =Ecm*(Mrare)/Mst+(1+φ)*MQP21303 16154
D (mm) 800 800 800 800 mqp = Es/ Ecm 6.2 6.2
d (mm) 715 715 717 717 mrare =Es/Eceff 9.4 12.4
Ast (mm2) 2513 2513 1608 1608
m 9 6 12 6
N. A.(x) 162 134 150 110
INA 8.63E+09 6.05E+09 7.53E+09 4.11E+09
Comp stress 6.69 4.10 0.01 0.02
Comp Perm. 16.80 12.60 16.80 12.60
Check 1 OK Ok Ok Ok
Tensile stress 215 110 1 1
Tensile Perm. 330 330 330 330
Check 2 OK Ok Ok Ok h k
0 1
Crack Width Check 0.3 1
For minimum Ast requirement for crak control 0.8 0.65
Section Sec 1 Sec 2 3 0.65
b 1000 1000
h 800 800
d 715 717 Srequired 200
Acteff Acteff =min(h/2,(h-N.A) 212500.0 207500.0 Check Ok
σst 160 160 Check for maximum
fcteff 2.9 2.9 spacing b/w bars
k 0.65 0.65 Load comb
kc 0.4 0.4 φ 20
As, min As,min=k*kc*fcteff/σst 1001 978 C 75
As provided 2513 1608 Sprovided 150
Check Ok Ok

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Check for crack width
Load comb
heff heff=min(2.5(h-d),(h- 212.5 207.5
b 1000 1000
Aceff Aceff = heff*b 212500 207500
Asprovided 2513 1608
ρpeff ρpeff =As/Aceff 0.012 0.008
k1 0.800 0.800
k2 0.500 0.500
Srmax Srmax=3.4c+0.17Φ/ρpeff 542.5 605.9
σsc 110 1
N.A 134 110
kt 0.5 0.5
αe εm =max(((σsc- 6 6
εm (kt*(fcteff/ρpeff)*(1+α 0.00033 0.00000
Wk 0.178 0.001
Check Ok Ok
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to 033
KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
13 Design of Pile Foundation
13.1 Design of Pile Foundation - Base Pressure
No. of piles = 10 A ML
Eccentricity between
Column and C.G of Pile = 0.00 m
4.8
Minimum Thickness of
Pile cap = 1.80 m
Thickness of pile cap = 1.8 m OK
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m -1.631, 8.71
Pile diameter = 1.20 m 1.631, 7.18
Area of pile = 1.131 m2
-1.631, 4.73 MT
16 1.631, 3.21
3
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m B B
-1.631, 0.76
Self weight of Pile cap = 378 t
1.631, -0.76
Total Length L1+Lf = 9 m
Length of pile = 17.0 m -1.631, -
Reduction factor for pile B.M= 0.86 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5) 3.21 1.631, -4.73
-1.631, -
Loads on Pile 7.18 1.631, -8.71
Normal Seismic A
Maximum Pile Load = 157 t. OK 216 OK Max. horizontal load on pile = 30.45 T OK
Minimum Pile Load = 49 t. OK -28 OK
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 49
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination
ML x 1.6 ML ML = Moment along longitudinal direction

Load due to ML = =
1 x 26.6 16.3 MT = Moment along transverse direction
MT x 7.2 MT (REFER ANNEXURE VI)
Load due to MT = =
1 x 321.3 44.7 Normal Seismic
Type of Load case Sr no Pile capacity from soil investigation report = 530 t 662.5
Normal Load case 1 to 3 Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 100 t 125
Wind Load case 4 to 6 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation report = 40 t
Seismic Transverse 7 to 12
Seismic Longitudinal 13 to 18
Seismic Vertical 19 to 24 ( self wt of pile excluded)
Vertical Load due Load due BM for pile

Load Max. load Min. load
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 Resultant H (T) =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
Comb 1
1
1196 23 538 303 0 120 33 1 153 86 30 112
L
W 2
L 1157 413 526 300 0 116 32 9 157 74 30 111
H 3
F 1029 23 480 305 0 103 29 1 133 73 30 112
L
4
991 413 468 301 0 99 29 9 137 61 30 111
SD-LWL 5
715 0 152 196 0 72 9 0 80.85 62 20 72
SD-HFL 6
549 0 92 195 0 55 6 0 60.50 49 20 72
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 50
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Seismic
7
1035 223 1748 729 62 104 107 5 216 -9 73 269
LWL - L
8
1028 297 1746 728 62 103 107 7 216 -11 73 269
9 1035 731 1120 518 208 104 69 16 189 19 56 205
LWL - T
10 1028 799 1117 517 206 103 69 18 189 16 56 205
11 931 223 1108 518 62 93 68 5 166 20 52 192
LWL - V
12 924 297 1106 517 62 92 68 7 167 18 52 192
13 869 223 1755 803 62 87 108 5 199 -26 81 297
HFL - L
14 861 297 1752 803 62 86 107 7 200 -28 81 296
15 869 731 1126 592 208 87 69 16 172.28 1 63 231
HFL - T
16 861 799 1124 592 206 86 69 18 172.90 -1 63 231
17 764 223 1114 592 62 76 68 5 149.70 3 60 219
HFL - V
18
758 297 1112 592 62 76 68 7 150.58 1 59 219
SD-LWL-L 19
688 65 637 443 37 69 39 1 109.38 28 44 164
SD-LWL-T 20 688 217 473 349 124 69 29 5 102.72 35 37 136
SD-LWL-V 21 626 65 461 349 37 63 28 1 92.29 33 35 129
SD-HFL-L 22 522 65 639 501 37 52 39 1 92.83 12 50 185
SD-HFL-T 23 522 217 475 406 124 52 29 5 86.17 18 43 157
SD-HFL-V 24 459 65 463 406 37 46 28 1 75.74 16 41 150
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 51
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197

Design of Pile Foundation -ULS CASE
4.8
Pile cap = 1.80 m
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m -1.631,
Pile diameter = 1.20 m 8.705 1.631, 7.18
-1.631,
16.0 MT
4.732 1.631, 3.21
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m3 B -1.631, B

Self weight of Pile cap = 378 t 0.76 0, 0
1.631, -
Total Length L1+Lf = 9 m 0.76
Length of pile = 17.0 m -1.631, -
Reduction factor for pile B.M= 0.85 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5) 3.211 1.631, -
4.73
-1.631, - 1.631, -
7.18 8.71
Loads on Pile
Normal Seismic A
Maximum Pile Load = 220 t. 256 Max. horizontal load on pile = 86.07 T
Minimum Pile Load = 79 t. 17 .
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 52
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197

Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
1 x 321.3 44.7
Type of Load case Sr no Pile capacity from soil investigation report =
Normal Load case 1 to 3 Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile =
Wind Load case 4 to 6 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation report =

Load Max. load Min. load Resultant H
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/
no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
Comb 1
L
1 1607 35 796 434 0 161 49 1 210 111 43 158
W
L 2 1582 619 777 429 0 158 48 14 220 97 43 156
H 3 1603 35 704 435 0 160 43 1 204 116 43 158
F
L 4 1545 619 685 430 0 154 42 14 210 99 43 157
SD-LWL 5 966 0 287 294 0 97 18 0 114.19 79 29 107
SD-HFL 6 928 0 193 293 0 93 12 0 104.70 81 29 107
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 53
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Comb 2
L
1 1206 30 746 373 0 121 46 1 167 74 37 136
W
L 2 1180 537 730 369 0 118 45 12 175 61 37 134
H 3 1197 30 665 374 0 120 41 1 161 78 37 136
F
L 4 1147 537 648 370 0 115 40 12 166 63 37 135
SD-LWL 5 715 0 316 255 0 72 19 0 90.93 52 25 93
SD-HFL 6 682 0 232 254 0 68 14 0 82.41 54 25 92
Seismic
7 1395 446 1727 790 126 140 106 10 255 24 80 291

LWL - L
8 1388 516 1724 790 125 139 106 12 256 22 80 291
9 1395 1476 784 474 421 140 48 33 221 58 63 231
LWL - T
10 1388 1533 782 473 418 139 48 34 221 57 63 230
11 1238 446 766 474 126 124 47 10 181 67 49 178
LWL - V
12 1232 518 764 473 125 123 47 12 182 65 49 178
13 1358 446 1734 851 126 136 106 10 252 20 86 313
HFL - L
14 1351 516 1732 851 125 135 106 12 253 17 86 313
15 1358 1476 791 535 421 136 49 33 217 54 68 248
HFL - T
16 1351 1533 789 534 418 135 48 34 218 52 68 247
17 1201 446 773 535 126 120 47 10 177 63 55 200
HFL - V
18 1195 518 771 534 125 119 47 12 178 61 55 200
SD-LWL-L 19 946 66 442 409 38 95 27 1 123 66 41 150
SD-LWL-T 20 946 220 319 339 126 95 20 5 119 70 36 132
SD-LWL-V 21 899 66 309 339 38 90 19 1 110 69 34 124
SD-HFL-L 22 908 66 448 467 38 91 27 1 120 62 47 170
SD-HFL-T 23 908 220 325 396 126 91 20 5 116 66 42 151
SD-HFL-V 24 861 66 316 396 38 86 19 1 107 65 40 145
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 54
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Note:
1 The Load combination presented above is calculated in accordance with Table 3.4 of notification No. 78-Amendment to IRC 6:2017 with unfactored loads. For load
combination no. 7 - 24 (Seismic Loads combination) is taken as 1.35 times the force transmitted to it by substrucure as per clause 219.8 of IRC 6:2017.
For Deflection calculation,as per Clause No:709.3.5.2 of Amendment to IRC:78-2014, Combination -I is only considered for checking of deflections and not
2
considered in other load combinations.
3 For load combination no. 7 - 24 (Seismic Loads combination) pile capacity is increased by 35% .
13.2.1 Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile
The depth of fixity and bending moments in the pile have been worked out as per
IS 2911 Part 1/ sec2 Appendix C (clause 5.5.2). The pile is considered to be in submerged soil of medium sand type
as per the soil report. Fixed head condition of piles is applicable because of pile cap at the top.
dia = Diameter of the pile = 1.200 m

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm2 = 320000 kg/cm2
I 4
= Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm= 1.02E+07 cm4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1 = 0.475 kg/cm3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - = 43.5 t
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - = 86.1 t
T = (321100 * 24850489 / 0.525) ^ 0.2 ) = 369.1 cm
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 116.0 cm

= 1.2 m
L1 / T = 116.0 / 369.1 = 0.3
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2.005
Lf = = 740.12 cm
= 7.402 m
3
= Q * (L1 + Lf) / (12[pile
Y * E head
* I) deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.70 cm
7.0 mm
MF = Q * (L1 + Lf) / 2 [Fixed end moment of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile ]
M = m * MF [actual maximum moment]

where
m = reduction factor [for fixed head pile] 0.85
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 55
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
13 14 Design of Pile Foundation
1 14.0 Design of Pile Foundation - SLS COMBINATIONS
6.3
Pile cap = 1.80 m
Pile diameter = 1.20 m 8.705 1.631, 7.18
-1.631,
6.3 MT
4.732 1.631, 3.21
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m3 B -1.631, 0.76 B
Self weight of Pile cap = 378 t 0, 0
1.631, -0.76
Length of pile = 17.0 m -1.631, -
-1.631, -
7.18 1.631, -8.71
Loads on Pile
Normal A
Maximum Pile Load = 154 t. Max. horizontal load on pile = 29.00 T
Minimum Pile Load = 62 t. .

Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
1 x 321.3 44.7
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
56
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033

no. (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
Rare
1
1172 23 491 289 0 117 30 1 148 87 29 105
L
W 2
L 1158 413 479 286 0 116 29 9 154 77 29 104
R
a H 3
F 1163 23 432 290 0 116 26 1 143 89 29 106
r
L
e 4
1124 413 419 287 0 112 26 9 147 77 29 104
SD-LWL 5
715 0 152 196 0 72 9 0 80.85 62 20 71
SD-HFL 6
682 0 91 195 0 68 6 0 73.74 63 20 71
QP
1
Q 1036 0 156 196 0 104 10 0 113 94 20 71
L
u
W
a 2
L 1060 0 156 196 0 106 10 0 116 96 20 71
s
i 3
H
1026 0 95 195 0 103 6 0 108 97 20 71
F
_
L 4
P 1026 0 95 195 0 103 6 0 108 97 20 71
e
r SD-LWL 5
m 715 0 152 196 0 72 9 0 80.85 62 20 71
a
SD-HFL 6
n 682 0 91 195 0 68 6 0 73.74 63 20 71

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
57
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm=4 1.02E+07 cm4
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - NORMAL = 29.0 t
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - SEISMIC = 19.6 t
T = (321100 * 24850489 / 0.525) ^ 0.2 ) = 369.4 cm

= 1.2 m
L1 / T = 116.0 / 369.4 = 0.3
Lf = 2.55 * 432.9 = 740.63 cm

= 7.407 m
3
= Q * (L1 + Lf) / (12[pile
Y * E head
= 0.46 cm
4.6 mm

where
A1_Fx-121+255_skew
58
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Design forces for Pile - ULS Case
Sno Case P ML MT HL HT
1 -1112 1579 0 434 0
2 -968 1562 0 429 0
3 -1163 1583 0 435 0
4 -986 1566 0 430 0
5 -790 1070 0 294 0
6 -810 1066 0 293 0
7 -742 1358 0 373 0
8 -613 1343 0 369 0
9 -783 1361 0 374 0
10 -629 1347 0 370 0
11 -521 927 0 255 0
12 -539 924 0 254 0
13 -237 2912 0 800 0
14 -215 2909 0 800 0
15 -584 2307 0 634 0
ULS
16 -566 2297 0 631 0
17 -669 1784 0 490 0
18 -648 1781 0 489 0
19 -195 3132 0 861 0
20 -174 3129 0 860 0
21 -543 2477 0 681 0
22 -524 2468 0 678 0
23 -627 2000 0 550 0
24 -607 1997 0 549 0
25 -660 1495 0 411 0
26 -701 1315 0 361 0
27 -694 1240 0 341 0
28 -619 1705 0 468 0
29 -660 1514 0 416 0
30 -653 1449 0 398 0
Pile dia 1.20 m Pile dia 1.20 m Stirrups

Dia of Bar 25 mm Dia of Bar 25 mm Dia 16
No. of bars 22 No. of bars 22 Spacing 150 mm
Total Ast 21598.45 mm^2
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 59
FAGUS:
Section properties
Reinforcement Details
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 60
Results:
UR
Moment Capacity 0.92 ok
Shear 0.86 ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 61
Design forces for Pile - SLS Case
Rare combination
1 -866 1053 0 289 0
2 -772 1042 0 286 0
3 -893 1056 0 290 0
Rare
4 -775 1045 0 287 0
5 -622 714 0 196 0
6 -626 711 0 195 0
Stress
Concrete 7.1 Mpa ok
Steel 113 Mpa ok
Stress Check critical results
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 62
Quasi Permanent combination
1 -940 714 0 196 0
2 -964 714 0 196 0
3 -968 711 0 195 0
QP
4 -968 711 0 195 0
5 -622 714 0 196 0
6 -626 711 0 195 0
Crack width critical case
crack width 0.05 mm ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 63

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
(Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West
Designed by: Checked by Date
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
STRUCTURE: Design of dirt wall 14-12-2018
15. DESIGN OF DIRTWALL
In the design of dirtwall the total height cosidered has been calculated taking into account a
slope of 2.5% provided in the carriageway.
For Backfill Soil :
0.30 Ka = 0.279
3.030 g = 1.80 t/m3
2 1
Eq. Height of surcharge = 1.2 m
1.522 t/m2 0.603 t/m2
Earth Pressure diagram
Height of dirtwall = 3.030 m
2
1 Earth Pressure due to surcharge = 0.603 t/m
2
2 Earth Pressure due to backfill of earth Rare = 1.522 t/m
ULS factor for earth pressure 1.5 SLS factor for earth pressure 1.3
ULS factor for live load surcharge 1.2 SLS factor for live load surcharge 1.0
ULS factor for live load 1.5 SLS factor for live load 1.3
QP
SLS factor for earth pressure 1
SLS factor for live load surcharge 0.8
SLS factor for live load 0
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to surcharge (1) = 2.77 t-m/m
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (2) = 2.93 t-m/m
Shear at the base of dirtwall due to surcharge (1) = 1.83 t/m

Shear at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (2) = 2.31 t/m
Calculation of force and moment due to the effect of braking :(cosidering 40t -Boggie loading)
1.7
10.0t 10.0t
3.03 2.79m
1.700 2.79 3.030
Effective width = 7.52 m

Braking force, 0.2*10*2 = 4 t
Braking force per metre width = 0.53 t/m
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to effect of braking = 1.61 t-m/m
SLS QP Bending moment = 5.15 t-m/m

SLS Rare Bending moment = 8.67 t-m/m
ULS bending moment = 10.14 t-m/m
ULS shear force at d effective = 6.45 t/m
Material property
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 64

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Grade of reinforcement = Fe 550
fyk = 550 Mpa
fck = 35
fcm = 45
Ecm = 32308 Mpa
Fyd = 440 Mpa
Clear cover = 50 mm
Ecm for short tem loading = 32308.2497 Mpa
Ecm for long term loading = 16154.1249 Mpa
fcteff = 2.77 Mpa
fcd = 15.61 Mpa
Creep factor φ = 1.5
εcu2 = 0.0035 mm

SLS rare = 16.8 Mpa
SLS QP = 12.6 Mpa

SLS rare = 330 Mpa
SLS QP = 330 Mpa
300
1000
ULS Capacity check
Section
MED (T-M) 10.14
b (mm) 1000
D (mm) 300
d (mm) 242
φ (mm) 16
s (mm) 125
Ast (mm2) 1608
Xumax (mm) 107
Xu (mm) Xu = (0.87*fyk*Ast)/(0.36*fck*b) 61
Check 1 OK
Astcal (mm2) Astcal =M/0.87*fyk*(d'-0.416 Xu) 978
Check 2 OK
Ast min As per cl 16.5.1.1 IRC-112 317
Check 3 Ok
ΔFd (T) 3.2
MED/Z + ΔFd 50.0
Check 4 OK
MRD/Z 77
Check 5 Ok
2
10 φ 200 C/C 393 mm
Ok
2
Secondary transverse reinforcement 322 mm
2
10 φ 200 C/C 393 mm
Ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 65

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Section Section
VED 6 VED 6
β 1 b 1000
βVED 6 deff 242
deff 242 z 217.8
b 1000 αcw 1
k k=min(1+sqrt(200/d),2) 1.91 ν1 0.53
VRDmax
ρ=min((Ast/b/deff),0.02) =αcw*b*z*v1*
ρ 0.0066 VRDmax fcd/2 90
νmin νmin=0.031k^(3/2)*fck 0.484 Check 7 Ok
σcp 0 θactual 2.04
VRDC 14.55 + 0.15*σcp),(vmin+0.15*σcp)))*b*deff/10^4
VRDC=(max(((0.12*k*(80*ρ*fck)^0.33) θadopted 45°
ΔFd (T) =
Check 6 Ok ΔFd (T) 0.5*Ved*cotθ 3.2
SLS Stress check
sec 1 Section 1
Load comb Rare QP Creep coefficient φ 1.5
MED (T-M) 8.67 5.15 Mst = Mrare-MQP 4
b (mm) 1000 1000 Eceff =Ecm*(Mrare)/Mst+(1+φ)*MQP 17095
D (mm) 300 300 mqp = Es/ Ecm 6.2
d (mm) 242 242 mrare =Es/Eceff 11.7
φ (mm) 16 16
s (mm) 125 125
Ast (mm2) 1608 1608 h k
m 12 6 0 1
N. A.(x) 78 60 0.3 1
INA 6.64E+08 4.02E+08 0.8 0.65
Comp stress 10.24 7.71 3 0.65
Comp Perm. 16.80 12.60
Check 1 OK Ok
Tensile stress 250 144
Tensile Perm. 330 330
Check 2 OK Ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 66

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Crack Width Check
For minimum Ast requirement for crak control
Section
d 242 Srequired 250
Acteff Acteff =min(h/2,(h-N.A) /3, 79941.91 Check Ok
σst 2.5*(h-d))*b 160
fcteff 2.9
k 0.65
kc 0.4
As, min As,min=k*kc*fcteff/σst 377
As provided 1608
Check Ok
Load comb heff=min(2.5(h-d),(h-
heff x/3),h/2) 79.94 Check for maximum
b 1000 spacing b/w bars
Aceff Aceff = heff*b 79942 Load comb
Asprovided 1608 φ 16
ρpeff ρpeff =As/Aceff 0.020 C 50
k1 0.800 Sprovided 125
k2 0.500
Srmax Srmax=3.4c+0.17Φ/ρpeff 305.2
σsc 144
N.A 60
kt 0.5
αe εm =max(((σsc- 6
εm (kt*(fcteff/ρpeff)*(1+αe*ρpe 0.00043
Wk 0.132
Check Ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 67
Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state
of West Bengal Designed by: Checked by Date
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment cap Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018
16.0 Design of Abutment Cap
The center line of the support lies within the abument wall width
Bearing pressure under the bearing is checked for satisfying the cube root formula :-
2
fcd = 15.61 N/mm for M35 grade,
Temporary bearing cenetricity 300 mm

Bearing size on elevation 350x 350 mm
dispersion angle of inclination 30 ° 700
radian 0.52
Loaded face edge distance from edge support
475 mm
Depth required to provide parallel r/f 823 mm
2
Uniform distribution of loadd area 122500 mm 850
2
Transferred bearing area 1102500 mm 1182.426
Frdu 573.67 Ton 300

Total load during construction 100 Ton
Ok
Depth of cap provided 850 mm
Ok 800
Therefore abutment cap has been designed as per Clause 716.2.1 , IRC :78- 2014
The abutment cap shall be reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel
Length of abutment cap 16.00 m

Width of abutment cap 2.282426 m
Depth of abutment cap for calculating minimum reinforcement 0.225 m
Reinforcement in the direction of length of abutment cap
2 2
Total Area of steel required (mm ) = 0.25 % in one direction 1283.9 mm
Steel provided at each face i.e top face and bottom face 12 nos. 12 dia
Area of steel provided (mm2) = 1357 mm

2
O.K.
Reinfocement in the direction at right angles to length of abutment cap
2 2
Area of steel required (mm )/m @ 0.25% 562.5 mm /m
Considering corbel detailing

ac 300 mm
Hc 850 mm
Follw detail 1
2
Minimum Aslink 339 mm /m
2
Provided 10 dia 6 leg stirrups 250 c/c 1885 mm
O.K.
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 68
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package- Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Designed by: Checked by Date
STRUCTURE: Design of Return wall Vishal S.Chatterjee 08-06-2018
17.0 DESIGN OF END RETURN WALL
1 Angle of Repose of Soil, f (in degrees) f= 30.0
2 Cohesion, C (in t/m2) C= 0.0
a = 5.600 3 Angle of Wall friction d= 20.0
gsub =
3
4 Density of Soil (submerged) , gsub (in t/m ) 1.00
5 Batter of wall with horizontal, a (in degrees) a= 90.00
6 Inclination of Backfill with horizontal, b (in degrees) b= 0.00
7 Equiv. Ht. of backfill earth for Live load surcharge (m) heb 1.2
For Coulomb's Theory Ka = 0.297
2 2 2
Ka = Sin (a+f)/ [Sin a sin (a-d) {1+ sqrt ((Sin(f+d).Sin (f-b))/(Sin (a-d).Sin(a+b)))} ]
For Rankine's Theory Ka = 0.333
'
Ka =
b = 5.700
8 Active Earth pressure Coefficient 0.297
ka = 0.279 KaH = 0.279
g = 1.80 KaV = 0.102
ULS factor for earth pressure 1.5 SLS factor for earth pressure 1
Grade of Concrete M 35 QP
Grade of steel 550 SLS factor for earth pressure 1
SLS factor for live load surcharge 0
Q2=ka*g*h
Q1=ka*g*SHt
The end return wall has been designed as a plate fixed on its two faces i.e. at the base and on one of its vertical sides.
( Refer Table 26 of Formula of Stress & Strain by Roark & Young ).
Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate

Height of Length of g1 g2
S.NO. return wall (m) return wall "a/b" (at x=a & z=0) Mb1 (t-
2
Q1 (t/m ) b1 b2 (at x=0 & z=b) Ma1 (t-m/m)
"b" (m) "a" m/m)
1 5.7 5.60 0.98 0.603 1.732 1.728 1.179 1.158 -5.65 -5.64
"a/b" Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

Q2 (t/m2) b1 b2 (at x=a & z=0) Mb2 (t-
g1 g2 (at x=0 & z=0.6b) Ma2 (t-m/m)
m/m)
0.98 2.863 0.684 0.389 0.558 0.195 -10.60 -6.02
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 69
Design of end return wall

Ultimate
Moment in
Moment in ulltimate moment of moment of
thk. of end thk. of end Deff thk. of return at horizontal
vertical resistance in vertical N A depth resistance in
return wall N A depth Deff provided return wall at provided 0.6H direction(Mh)
direction(Mv) dir. (Mu) tm horizontal dir.
at top bottom ULS
ULS -' ™ (Mu) tm
400 108 315 400 -22.69 37 69 317 400 -15.80 25
lever arm z 269.45 OK OK

Lever arm at 0.6Z 287.85
Vertical reinforcement Horizontal reinforcement

Earth face Outer face Earth face Outer face
spacing
bar dia spacing bar dia
provided
20 f @ 100 c/c 12 f @ 100 c/c 16 f @ 100 c/c 12 f @ 100 c/c
Ast provided (vertical) = 3141.59 mm2 Ast provided (horizontal) = 2010.62 mm2 1130.97 mm2
CHECK FOR SHEAR
For "a/b" (at x=a & z=0) R1

b1 b2 g1 g2
2
Q1 (t/m ) (at x=0 & z=0.8b) R2 (t-m/m2)
(t/m)
0.982 0.603 1.732 1.728 1.179 1.158 3.827 3.758
Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

b1 b2 g1 g2
2
Q2 (t/m ) (at x=0 & z=0.6b) R4 (t-m/m2)
(t/m)
0.982 2.704 0.684 0.389 0.558 0.195 8.132 2.835
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 70
At x = a & z = 0 At x = a & z At x = 0 & z

=0 = 0.6*b
D 400 400 mm
Grade of Concrete M 35 M 35
Deff 315 315 mm
Design Shear Force V 16.79 9.04 (t/m)
Check for Check for shear Check for maximum shear capacity
Check for shear maximum Load Comb 0.6H Load Comb At 0.6H
Load Comb Load Comb At base VED 9.04 VED 9.0
VED 16.79 VED 16.79 β 1 b 1000
β 1 b 1000 βVED 9.04 deff 315
βVED 16.79 deff 315 deff 315 z 283.5
deff 315 z 283.5 b 1000 αcw 1
b 1000 αcw 1 k 1.80 ν1 0.53
VRDmax
=αcw*b*z*v1
k k=min(1+sqrt(200/d),2) 1.80 ν1 0.53 ρ 0.0064 VRDmax *fcd/2 118
VRDmax
ρ=min((Ast/b/deff),0.02) =αcw*b*z*v1*f
ρ 0.0100 VRDmax cd/2 118 νmin 0.442 Check 7 Ok
νmin νmin=0.031k^(3/2)*fck 0.442 Check 7 Ok σcp 0 θactual 2.20
σcp 0 θactual 4.10 VRDC 17.59 θadopted 45
VRDC=(max(((0.12*k*(80*ρ
*fck)^0.33) + ΔFd (T) =
VRDC 0.15*σcp),(vmin+0.15*σcp) 20.38 θadopted 45 Check OK ΔFd (T) 0.5*Ved*cotθ 4.52
ΔFd (T) =
Check OK ΔFd (T) 0.5*Ved*cotθ 8.395
Shear R/f not required
Dia of shear r/f 10
Spacing 250 SLS Moment of return wall
No of legs 8 At bottom section At 0.6H section
fywd 400 SLS rare moment in SLS Qp Moment in SLS rare moment in SLS Qp Moment in
VRds 29 vertical dir. (Mu) tm vertical direction horizontal dir. (Mu) tm horizontal direction(Mh)
VRd 29
Check OK 15.1 10.6 10.5 6.0
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 71
Creep coefficient φ 1 1
SLS Stress check Bottom section Horizontal Cover 75.00mm Mst = Mrare-MQP 5 5
Load comb Rare QP Rare QP ES 200000 Eceff =Ecm*(Mrare)/Mst+(1+φ)*MQP 18994 20556
MED (T-M) 15 11 11 6 Fcm M 45 mqp = Es/ Ecm 6.2 6.2
b (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 Ecm 32308 mrare =Es/Eceff 10.5 9.73
D (mm) 400 400 400 400
d (mm) 315 315 317 317
φ (mm) 20 20 16 16
s (mm) 100 100 100 100
Ast (mm2) 3142 3142 2011 2011
m 11 6 10 6
N. A.(x) 115 93 94 77
INA 1.83E+09 1.23E+09 1.25E+09 8.69E+08
Comp stress 9.50 8.03 7.88 5.35
Comp Perm. 16.80 12.60 16.80 12.60
Check 1 Ok Ok Ok Ok h k
Tensile stress 174 119 183 103 0 1
Tensile Perm. 300 300 300 300 0.3 1
Check 2 Ok Ok Ok Ok 0.8 0.65
3 0.65
Crack Width Check
Load comb Base 0.6H
b 1000 1000
h 400 400
d 315 317
Acteff =min(h/2,(h-N.A) /3,
Acteff 2.5*(h-d))*b 102354.5 107582.4 From Table 12.2 IRC112
σst 160 160
fcteff 2.9 2.9 cl 12.3.3 IRC-112
k 0.65 0.65 Eq 12.2 IRC-112
kc 0.4 0.4
As, min As,min=k*kc*fcteff/σst 482 507
As provided 3142 2011
Check Ok Ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 72
Srequired 200
Check for crack width Check Ok
Load comb
heff=min(2.5(h-d),(h- Check for maximum spacing
heff x/3),h/2) 102.354 107.582 b/w bars
b 1000 1000 Load comb
Aceff Aceff = heff*b 102354 107582 φ 20
Asprovided 3142 2011 C 75
ρpeff ρpeff =As/Aceff 0.031 0.019 Sprovided 100
k1 0.800 0.800
k2 0.500 0.500
σsc 119 103
N.A 93 77
kt 0.5 0.5
αe 6 6
εm =max(((σsc-
εm (kt*(fcteff/ρpeff)*(1+αe*ρ 0.00036 0.00031
Wk 0.130 0.124
Check Ok Ok
A1_Fx-121+255_skew 73
West Bengal
Abutment(Fr) for Bridge at chainage 121+255
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 74
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
DD-033
Bengal
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) - MNB at
Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
Ch:121+255
1. General
This design note pertains to the design of abutment . Superstructure consists of
precast PSC girder,supported on POT PTFE bearing.
The substructure consists of RCC wall type abutment on open foundation.
Following components of substructure and foundation are designed

1 Abutmeftnt Shaft
2 Abutment cap
3 Dirt wall
4 Footing / pile cap / pile
5 Return wall
2. Codes and Specifications

Following codes have been used in the design
Sl.No. Code Year of Publication
1 IRC : 6 2017
2 IRC : 112 2011
3 IRC : 78 2014
3. Loads
1 Dead load (Due to self weight of superstructure, substructure, foundation and backfill weight)
2 Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) excluding wearing course due to crash barrier, footpath and railing
(if present)
3 Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) due to wearing course
4 Carriageway live load Future widening keeping in mind
Max P case
Max Mt case
5 Footpath Live Load (FPLL) (if footpath is present)
6 Earth pressure due to backfill
7 Buoyancy in HFL case
Wind load is not considered as it is not governing
4. Load Combinations for Limit State

Following Limit States are considered
A Ultimate Limit State (For verification of Equilibrium)

A-1 Basic Combination
B Ultimate Limit State (For verification of structural strength)

B-1 Basic Combination
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 75
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
DD-033
Bengal
Ch:121+255
C Serviceability Limit State

C-1 Rare Combination (For checking stress limits)
C-2 Quasi-permanent Combination (For checking crack width in RCC structures)
D Combination for Design of Foundation

D-1 Combination 1
D-2 Combination 2
Accidental combination is not considered for abutment
5. Design Philosophy
Design is done using limit state method
i. Base Pressure Check

Base pressure check is performed from load combinations of unfactored loads as mentioned in Cl. No. 706.1.
of IRC:78-2014. As mentioned in Note no.9 under Table 3.4 of IRC:6-2017, IRC:78 shall be used
for checking base pressure
ii. Design of Abutment shaft

Abutment shaft is designed as rectangular column subjected to axial load and biaxial bending
ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked using Fagus software
Basic combination is used for checking ULS strength. Rare combination is used for checking
stress. Quasi-permanent combination is used for checking crack width.
iii. Design of Footing

ULS design is done using Combination 1 while stress is checked using Combination 2.
Crack width is controlled by adjusting bar diameter and spacing.
iv. Design of Abutment Cap

The Abutment cap is reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel distributed equally at both faces
and in both directions. Cantilever/corbel action is checked in longitudinal direction for eccentricity of bearings
with repect to abutment centerline.
vi. Design of Dirt Wall

vii. Design of End Return Wall

A2_Fr-121+255_skew 76
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
1 Basic Design Data

1.1 Span and Cross section Data
C/C of expansion gap = 22.02 m (Sq.)
C/C of bearing = 19.49 m (Sq.)
Distance of bearing to expansion gap = 1.27 m (Sq.)
Expansion Gap = 0.02 m (Sq.)
C/C of expansion gap = 24.30 m (Sk.)
C/C of bearing = 21.50 m (Sk.)
Distance of bearing to expansion gap = 1.40 m (Sk.)
Expansion Gap = 0.02 m (Sk.)
Carriageway width = 16.00 m
Carriageway width considered for design = 16.00 m
Total width = 15.00 m
Footpath Width (Left side) = 0.00 m
Footpath Width (Left side) considered for design = 0.00 m
Footpath Width (Right side) = 0.00 m
Crash Barrier Width (Left side) = 0.50 m
Crash Barrier Width (Right side) = 0.50 m
Handrail Width (Left side) = 0.00 m
Handrail Width (Left side) considered for design = 0.00 m
Handrail Width (Right side) = 0.00 m
o
Skew Angle = 25.00 0.436 radians
cos q = 0.906307787
1.2 Superstructure Details
Type of Structure = Girder
Depth of Girder = 2.00 m
Depth of Deck Slab = 0.20 m
Depth of superstructure = 2.200 m
Spacing of girders = 3.000 m
No. of Girders = 5.00
Thickness of diaphragm = 0.600 m
Thickness of wearing coat = 0.100 m
Cross-slope = 2.963
Thickness of bearing = 0.200 m
Thickness of pedestal (minimum) = 0.150 m
Minimum thickness of wedge = 0.415 m
Thickness of nearest bearing+pedestal = 0.350 m
1.3 Material Data

Grade of concrete fck = M35
Design strength of concrete fcd = 15.63 MPa
Grade of steel fyk = Fe550
Design strength of steel fyd = 478.3 MPa
Density of wearing course = 2.20 t/m3
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of concrete = 1.20E-05 /oC (Cl.215.4, IRC 6 2017)
Shrinkage strain = 2.0E-04 (Cl.217.3, IRC 6 2017)
Modulus of Elasticity of steel Es = 2.0E+05 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of concrete Ec = 3.2E+04 MPa
Mean axial tensile strength of concrete fctm = 2.8 MPa
Grade of concrete for pedestals/stoppers = 50 MPa
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 77
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
1.4 Typical Levels

Formation Level "FRL" = 63.810 m
Dirt wall level = 63.810 m
Bearing level = 61.096 m
Max. Abutment cap level "CTL" = 60.746 m
Stem top level = 59.896 m
Front Ground level "GL" = 59.500 m
Rock top Level = 57.200 m Put Rock top level below
Scour level considered for design = 53.990 m founding level for sandy soil
Footing top level = 59.000 m
Minimum Founding level = 57.200 m
Founding level (design) "FL" = 57.200 m
Highest flood level "HFL" = 59.350 m
Lowest Water level "LWL" = 57.200 m
1.5 Soil Parameters

Angle of Shear resistance"f" = 30 o
Density of Dry Backfill "gd" = 1.80 t/m3
3
Density of Submerged Backfill "gsub" = 1.00 t/m
Net Safe Bearing Capacity = 20.00 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (LWL) = 22.30 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (HFL) = 16.79 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (LWL) seismic case = 27.30 t/m2
Gross Safe Bearing Capacity (HFL) seismic case = 27.30 t/m2
Live load surcharge = 1.20 m
Type of soil = Medium Soil
Coefficient of friction between = 0.50
(Soil/Rock and concrete)
1.6 Abutment Dimensions (Square)

Length of abutment cap in L-L direction at top = 2.28 m
Length of abutment cap in L-L direction at bottom = 2.28 m
Width of abutment (sqr) ** Refer below sketch for dimension = 16.00 m 17.65 (skew)
Length of footing (sqr) convention in row 128 = 16.00 m 17.65 (skew)
Width of footing( SQr) = 4.76 m 5.255 (skew)
Width of heel(sqr) = 1.98 m 2.186148832 (skew)
Minimum footing thickness = 1.80 m
Heel thickness at root = 1.80 m
Toe thickness at root = 1.80 m
Stem top thickness(straight) = 0.80 m
Stem bottom thickness(straight) = 0.80 m
Dirtwall thickness = 0.30 m
Depth of abutment cap (Constant portion) = 0.85 m
Depth of abutment cap (Varying portion) = 0.00 m
Return Wall Thickness at top = 0.40 m
Return Wall Thickness at bottom = 0.40 m
Return Wall thickness at HFL = 0.40 m
Height of Uniform portion of return wall = 0.00 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg. upto HFL) = 0.40 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg. below HFL) = 0.40 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg. ) = 0.40 m
No. of return wall = 2
Transverse ecc. of CG of abut from foundation c.g. = 0.00 m
Provision of weep holes in abutment wall = Yes
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 78
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
For Piles
Dia of piles 1.20 m 5.26 y
no. of piles 10
Pile cap in Long direction 4.76 m 0.88

x
Pile cap in Trans direction 16.00 m 16.00
Depth of pile cap 1.80 m 1.5 times of pile dia 3.6
orthgonal axis for pile co-ordinate in skew 3.972161
Dimension input format for skew abutment

0.30 1.29
FRL
63.810m
3.06
61.096m Bearing Lvl
CTL
2.28 0.85 60.746m
0.00
0.80
1.18 0.3
6.610 HFL 59.350m
GL 59.500m
0.80 FTL 59.000m
1.80 1.80 FL 57.200m
1.98 1.98 MSL 53.990m

4.76
Distance between bearing c/l and mid of shaft sec at bottom in long. dirn. = 0.01 m
C/l of bearing is to the right of c/l of shaft
Eccentricity Shaft c/l to fdn c/l = 0.00906308 m
1.7 Partial Safety Factors
Partial safety factor for relevant loads are presented here
(As per Annex B of IRC:6-2017)
For Loads
Ultimate Limit State (For Verification of Equilibrium) (Table 3.1, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)
Resisting Resisting
Dead Load 1.05 0.95 1.05 1.0

SIDL (except surfacing) 1.05 0.95 1.05 1.0
SIDL (surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35 1.0
1.5 0 - -
(Leading)
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 79
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
Live load and associated loads 1.15 0 0.2 0

(Accompanying)
Earth Pressure 1.5 - 1.0 -
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 0 - -
Thermal Load (Leading) 1.5 0 - -
Thermal Load (Accompanying) 0.9 0 0.5 -
- - 0.75 -
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 80
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
For Loads Unfactored load combinatins for verification of equilibrium as per IRC:78-2014
(For Verification of Equilibrium)
Resisting Resisting
Dead Load 1 1 1.00 1.0
SIDL (except surfacing) 1 1 1.00 1.0
SIDL (surfacing) 1 1 1.00 1.0
1 0 - -
(Leading)
1 0 1 0
(Accompanying)
Earth Pressure 1 - 1.0 -
Live Load Surcharge 1 0 1 -
Thermal Load (Leading) 1 0 1 -
Thermal Load (Accompanying) 1 0 1 -
- - 1 -
Ultimate Limit State (For

Verification of Structural Serviceability Limit State
(Table 3.2, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)
Strength)
Quasi-
Basic Seismic
Load Rare Comb permanent
Comb Comb
Comb
Dead Load 1.35 1.35 1 1
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1.35 1 1
SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1.75 1.2 1.2
Live load and associated loads 1.5 0 1 0

(Leading)
1.15 0.2 0.75 0
(Accompanying)
Water Current 1 1 1.0 1.0
Buoyancy 0.15 1 0.8 0
Earth Pressure 1.5 1 1 -
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 0.2 0.15 0.15
Seismic Effect (During service) - 1.5 1.0 -
- 0.75 0.6 0.5

A2_Fr-121+255_skew 81
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
Combination for Design of Foundation (Table 3.4, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)

Load Comb 1 Comb 2 Seismic Comb Quasi comb Rare Comb
Dead Load 1.35 1 1.35 1 1
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35 1 1
SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1 1.75 1.2 1.2
Live load and associated loads 1.5 1.3 0.2 0 1

(Leading)
1.5 1 0.2 0 0.75
(Accompanying)
1.5 1 1.35 1 1
Backfill (adding effect)
1.35 1 1.35 1 1
Backfill (relieving effect)
Water Current 1 1 1 0 1
Buoyancy (Base Pressure) 1 1 1 -
Buoyancy (Structural Design) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Earth Pressure 1.5 1.3 1 1 1

Live Load Surcharge 1.2 1 0.2 0 0.8
Thermal load 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6
Seismic Effect (During service) - - 1.5 0 0
- - 0.75 0 0
Unfactored Loads as per Cl. 706.1 of IRC:78-2014 has been considered for base pressure check
For Materials
Basic Seismic
Material
Comb Comb
Concrete 1.5 1.5
Reinforcing steel 1.15 1.15
1.8 Load Data

Dead Load
SIDL
Excluding wearing course
Self weight of crash barrier = 1.0 t/m
Self weight of railing = 0 t/m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier (with footpath case) = 0.00 m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier (without footpath case) = 0.00 m
Total weight of footpath/services 0.00 t
Wearing course 0.22 t/m2

Transverse eccentricity of wearing course (with footpath case) = 0.00 m
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 82
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal
1.9 Bearing Data

Ignore data of elastomeric bearing Not Applicable
=
Length (along traffic dirn.) l 250 mm
Width (perpendicular to traffic dirn.) b = 250 mm
Height of elastomeric bearing h0 = 80 mm
Thickness of steel plate ts = 4 mm
Clear Cover to Steel Plate (horozontal) c = 6 mm
Clear Cover to Steel Plate (vertical) he = 6 mm
No. Of steel plates n = 8 mm
Effective thickness of the elastomeric bearing heff = 36 mm
Shear Modulus G = 1 Mpa
No. of Bearing over abutment on support line n = 5
1.10 Clear Cover

Dirt Wall = 50 mm
Abutment Cap = 50 mm
Abutment Stem = 50 mm
Footing = 75 mm
1.11 Seismic Zone Factor

Seismic Zone = V
Importance Factor = 1.2
Response Reduction Factor = 1 Cl. 219.5, NOTE, IRC:6-2017)
Temperature variation = 30 oC
Condition of exposure = Moderate
Factor by which seismic force is increased for design of foundation in long = 1.35 (Cl.219.8, IRC 6 2017)
Factor by which seismic force is increased for design of foundation in Trans = 1
1.12 Sign Convention
Resisting moment (about toe) Positive
Overturning moment (about toe) Negative
Horizontal forces away from earth side Positive

Horizontal forces towards earth side Negative
Downward force Positive

Upward force/uplift Negative
In the transverse direction

Eccentricity towards footpath side Positive
Eccentricity away from footpath side Negative
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 83
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
2 Load Calculation from Superstructure
2.1 Dead Load of Superstructure

Reaction = 279.5 t
Total reaction on abutment = 279.5 t

Longitudinal moment = 2.5 t-m

Transverse Moment = 0.00 t-m
2.2 SIDL (crash barrier, railing, footpath) - excluding wearing course

With Footpath Case









A2_Fr-121+255_skew 84
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
2.3 SIDL (wearing course)
With Footpath Case
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course = 0.0 m

Transverse Moment (wearing course) = 0 t-m

Transverse eccentricity of wearing course = 0m

Transverse Moment (wearing course) = 0.00 t-m
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 85
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
2.4 Summary of Loads from Superstructure

With Footpath Case
At Bearing Level
P ML MT HL HT
Load Item
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 279.5 2.5 0.0 0 0
24.3 0.2202328 0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (with
40.095 0.3633841 0 0 0
foothpath case
24.3 0.2202328 0.00 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (without
33.91585 0.307382 0.00 0 0
foothpath case

P ML MT HL HT
Load Item
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 279.5 2.5 0.0 0 0
24.3 0.2 0.0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (with
40.1 0.4 0.0 0 0
foothpath case
24.3 0.2 0.0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (without
33.9 0.3 0.0 0 0
foothpath case

ML (about MT(about
P HL HT
Load Item toe) footing c/l)
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 279.5 663.0 0.0 0 0 with respect to toe
24.3 57.6 0.0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) (with
40.1 95.1 0.0 0 0
foothpath case
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 86
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
3 Seismic Coefficient Calculation
T = Fundamental Time Period = 2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
D = Appropriate Dead Load of the Superstructure = 6877.90 KN

and percentage of Live Load in KN
F = Horizontal Force in KN required to be applied at the centre of the mass of the

superstructure for 1mm horizontal deflection at the top of the pier along the
considered direction of horizontal Force
Horizontal Force in Longitudinal Direction applied = 10 KN
L = Height of the Abutment above fixity Level including = 2.096 m

abutment cap
G = Grade of Concrete for Abutment = M35
E = Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete = 32000.0 Mpa
= 3.20E+06 t/m^2
b = width of abutment = 0.800 m

Cracked MOI factor = 1.000
I -L = Moment of Inertia of the Pier in long diretion = 0.753 m4
Shear Rating is zero
Deflection at the top of the abut in long. dir.
d1 = Deflection due to shear rating of bearing = 0.000 mm
d2 = FL3/3EI = 0.0013 mm

deflection

2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient = 2.50 2.5

Deflection at the top of the abut in trans dir.

I -T = Moment of Inertia of the Pier in trans diretion = 366.810 m4
d2 = FL3/3EI = mm

deflection

2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient = 1.04 #N/A

The project stretch is in seismic zone V

Longitudinal direction:
Type of Soil Medium Soil

A2_Fr-121+255_skew
87
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Transverse direction:

Ah = Horizontal Seismic Coefficient in long. dir. = 0.1800

(Z/2)*(S a /g)/(R/I) say 0.1800
Ah = Horizontal Seismic Coefficient in trans. dir. = 0.2247

(Z/2)*(S a /g)/(R/I) say 0.2247
A v = Vertical Seismic Coefficient (Clause 222.3 of latest amendments) = 0.1200

2/3 * A h say 0.1200
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
88
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from 033
4.0 Calculation of Earth Pressure Co-efficient & Dynamic increament : (As per IRC-6:2017)
LWL Case:
Input : gsat = 2.0 t/m3
3
Density of Earth g dry = 1.8 t/m
gsub = 1.0 t/m3
Angle of internal friction of soil f = 30 deg = 0.524 radians
Angle of friction between wall and earthfill d = 20 deg = 0.349 radians
Angle which earth face makes with the vrtical a = 0 deg = 0.000 radians
Slope of earthfill b = 0 deg = 0 radians
Live Load surcharge = 1.20 m
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient ah = 0.18
Slope of earthfill i = 0 deg = 0 radians
Angle of earthface of wall with vertical a' = 0 deg = 0 radians
Width of abutment in dir. normal to traffic direction = 16.0 m
Skew angle = 25 deg = 0.436 radians

F1
F2 4.810 6.610 m
1.800 57.200 (Bottom of Foundation)/LWL

p2 p1
Ka = cos2(f-a) = 0.297

Kp = cos2(f+a) = 6.105
cos a*cos(d-a)*[1-sqrt(sin(f+d)*sin(f+b)/cos(a-b)*cos(d-a)]
2 2

For Abt Base
2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.279 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.603 t/m 0.603
earth pressure

Abutment Base:
2
(t/m ) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 4.810 51.209 51.209 2.405 123.169 0.5H
2 F2 2.416 17.65 4.810 102.588 102.588 2.020 207.268 0.42H 37.505
153.797 330.437 37.505
Foundation Bottom:
2
(t/m ) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 6.610 70.371 70.371 3.305 232.592 0.5H
2 F2 3.320 17.65 6.610 193.724 193.724 2.776 537.853 0.42H 70.824
264.095 770.445 70.824
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
89
tan-1(ah/1+av) l = 0.159 radians

Ca = 0.467
tan-1(ah/1-av) l = 0.202 radians
Ca = 0.404
Governing value of Ca is greater of the two calculated above = 0.467
Horizontal coefficient Ch=Cacos d = 0.439

Vertical coefficient Cv=Casin d = 0.160
Dynamic increase in the horizontal direction =Ch-Kh = 0.160

Dynamic increase in the vertical direction =Cv-Kv = 0.058

F1 6.610 m
F2 4.810
57.200 (Bottom of foundation)

p2 p1
For Abt Base

2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.16 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.346 t/m 0.346


Abutment Base:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 4.810 51.209 51.209 2.405 123.169 H/2 0.000
2 F2 2.416 17.654 4.810 102.588 102.588 1.587 162.853 H/3 37.505
1 F1 0.346 17.654 4.810 29.384 29.384 3.175 93.294 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 1.385 17.654 4.810 58.810 58.810 2.405 141.438 H/2 21.319
241.99 241.99 520.75 58.82
Foundation Bottom:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 6.610 70.371 70.371 3.305 232.592 H/2 0.000
2 F2 3.320 17.654 6.610 193.724 193.724 2.181 422.599 H/3 70.824
1 F1 0.346 17.654 6.610 40.379 40.379 4.363 176.174 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 1.904 17.654 6.610 111.100 111.100 3.305 367.186 H/2 40.274
415.57 415.57 1198.55 111.10
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
90
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from
5.0 Calculation of Earth Pressure Co-efficient & Dynamic increament : (As per IRC-6:2017))
HFL Case:

F1
F3 4.810 6.610 m
p3 p1 59.350 (HFL)
p4 p2
F2 0.350 2.150
F4
F5
p4 1.800 57.200 (Bottom of Foundation)/LWL
p5 p2
Ka = cos2(f-a) = 0.308
Above HFL
Kp = cos2(f+a) = 4.143 6.105

cos2a*cos(d-a)*[1-sqrt(sin(f+d)*sin(f+b)/cos(a-b)*cos(d-a)]2

For Abt Base
2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.279 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.603 t/m 0.603
p2 = 0.303 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.654 t/m2 0.654
p4 = 0.303 * 1.8 * 4.46 = 2.433 t/m2 2.433
p5 = 0.303 * 1 * 2.15 = 0.651 t/m2 0.106
earth pressure

Abutment Base:
2
(t/m ) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 4.460 47.483 47.483 2.580 122.517 0.5H 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.65 0.350 4.041 4.041 0.175 0.707 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.240 17.65 4.460 88.194 88.194 2.223 196.090 0.42H 32.243
4 F4 2.433 17.65 0.350 15.033 15.033 0.175 2.631 0.5H 5.496
5 F5 0.106 17.65 0.350 0.327 0.327 0.116 0.038 0.33H 0.057
155.078 5.269 321.982 37.796
Foundation Bottom:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
1 F1 0.603 17.65 4.460 47.483 47.483 4.380 207.986 0.5H 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.65 2.150 24.823 24.823 1.075 26.685 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.240 17.65 4.460 88.194 88.194 4.023 354.839 0.42H 32.243
4 F4 2.433 17.65 2.150 92.347 92.347 1.075 99.273 0.5H 33.761
5 F5 0.651 17.65 2.150 12.355 12.355 0.710 8.766 0.33H 2.161
265.202 11.263 697.549 68.165

(Ws / Ws-1) = 2
tan-1 ((ah/1+av)*(Ws / Ws-1)) l = 0.311 radians 17.81888891
Ca = 0.656
tan-1 ((ah/1-av)*(Ws / Ws-1)) l = 0.388 radians
Ca = 0.633
Above HFL
Governing value of Ca is greater of the two calculated above = 0.656 0.467
Horizontal coefficient Ch=Cacos d = 0.646 0.439

Vertical coefficient Cv=Casin d = 0.114 0.16
Dynamic increase in the horizontal direction =C h-Kh = 0.343 0.160
Dynamic increase in the vertical direction =Cv-Kv = 0.061 0.058
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
91
p1
F3
F1 6.610 m
p3 4.810 59.350 (HFL)
p4 F2 p2
F4
F5
p4 57.200 (Bottom of foundation)
p5 p2
For Abt Base

2
LL surcharge p1 = 0.16 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.346 t/m 0.346
p2 = 0.343 * 1.8 * 1.2 = 0.741 t/m2 0.741
p4 = 0.343 * 1.8 * 4.46 = 2.754 t/m2 2.754
p5 = 0.343 * 1 * 2.15 = 0.737 t/m2 0.12


Abutment Base:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 4.460 47.483 47.483 2.580 122.517 H/2 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.654 0.350 4.041 4.041 0.175 0.707 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.240 17.654 4.460 88.194 88.194 1.822 160.685 H/3 32.243
4 F4 2.433 17.654 0.350 15.033 15.033 0.175 2.631 0.5H 5.496
5 F5 0.106 17.654 0.350 0.327 0.327 0.116 0.038 0.33H 0.057

1 F1 0.346 17.654 4.460 27.246 27.246 3.294 89.746 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 0.741 17.654 0.350 4.579 4.579 0.231 1.058 0.66H 0.000
3 F3 1.285 17.654 4.460 50.594 50.594 2.580 130.544 H/2 18.340
4 F4 2.754 17.654 0.350 17.017 17.017 0.175 2.978 H/2 6.169
5 F5 0.120 17.654 0.350 0.371 0.371 0.175 0.065 H/2 0.134
254.89 254.89 510.97 62.44
Foundation Bottom:
(t/m2) (m) (m) (T) (T) (m) (Tm) (T)
Static component
1 F1 0.603 17.654 4.460 47.483 47.483 4.380 207.986 H/2 0.000
2 F2 0.654 17.654 2.150 24.823 24.823 1.075 26.685 0.5H 0.000
3 F3 2.240 17.654 4.460 88.194 88.194 3.622 319.434 H/3 32.243
4 F4 2.433 17.654 2.150 92.347 92.347 1.075 99.273 0.5H 33.761
5 F5 0.651 17.654 2.150 12.355 12.355 0.710 8.766 0.33H 2.161

1 F1 0.346 17.654 4.460 27.246 27.246 5.094 138.788 0.66H 0.000
2 F2 0.741 17.654 2.150 28.121 28.121 1.419 39.904 0.66H 0.000
3 F3 1.285 17.654 4.460 50.594 50.594 4.380 221.613 H/2 18.340
4 F4 2.754 17.654 2.150 104.531 104.531 1.075 112.371 H/2 37.892
5 F5 0.737 17.654 2.150 13.987 13.987 1.075 15.036 H/2 2.487
489.68 489.68 1189.86 126.89
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
92
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) - Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
6 LIVE LOAD CALCULATION (NORMAL CASE)
Live Load Calculation
Following live load cases are considered

1 1 lane 70R-Wheeled
2 1 Lane Class A
3 3 Lane Class A
Reaction due to DL of superstructure = 279.5 t

Reaction due to SIDL exl w/c = 24.3 t
Reaction due to SIDL due to w/c = 40.10 t
Live Load
Max Reaction Case i/c Lane deduction factor/congetion factor Without Impact
P = 136 t eL 0.782
ML = 126 t-m
MT = 22.8 t-m
HT = 0
Max MT Case
P = 98.4 t eL 0.924796748
ML = 91 t-m
MT = 413
HT = 0
Max Reaction Case


u (Rq) 6.8 t
Fh 0t
Normal Case
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) -23.9948 t
Long force 24.0 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 23.99475 t
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 93
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) - Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
Seismic Case
u (Rq) 1.36 t
Fh 0t
u(Rq+Rg) = 18.55475 t
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) -18.5548 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 18.55475 t
Max Moment Case


u (Rq) 4.92 t
Fh 0t
Normal Case
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) -22.1148 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 22.1148 t
Seismic Case
u (Rq) 0.984 t
Fh 0t Remember to remove lane deduction from here
u(Rq+Rg) = 18.17875 t
Fh-u(Rq+Rg) -18.1788 t
Fh/2+u(Rq+Rg) 18.1788 t
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 94
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) -
MNB at Ch:121+255
7 Seismic Forces at Bearing Level from Superstructure
Following live load cases are considered ang_seis

1 1 lane 70R-Wheeled 0
2 1 Lane Class A
3 3 Lane Class A
Reaction due to self weight of superstructure = 279.5 t

Total SIDL reaction ( Excluding wc) = 24.3 t
Total SIDL reaction ( wc) = 40.095
Horizontal seismic coefficient (long.) ahl = 0.180
Horizontal seismic coefficient (trans.) aht = 0.225
Seismic force on DL + SIDL , long. Dirn. = 61.9 t
Seismic force on DL + SIDL , trans. Dirn.-Max P = 77.3 t
Seismic force on DL + SIDL , vert. Dirn. = 41.3 t
r1 = Full seismic force in longitudinal direction = ahl*(DL+SIDL)

r2 = Full seismic force in transverse direction = aht*(DL+SIDL+Appropriate LL)
r3 = Full seismic force in vertical direction = av*(DL+SIDL+Appropriate LL)
3 Max MT case
Live Load Reaction on abutment = 19.68 t Max MT Case Reaction

r1 = 61.9 t
r2 = 81.7 t
r3 = 43.6 t

HL Seismic = 0.00 t

HL Seismic = 0.00 t

HL Seismic = 0.00 t
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 95
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
MNB at Ch:121+255
4 Max Rxn case
Live Load Reaction on abutment = 27.20 t Max P Case Reaction

r1 = 61.9 t
r2 = 83.4 t
r3 = 44.5 t

HL Seismic = 0.00 t

HL Seismic = 0.00 t

HL Seismic = 0.00 t
Summary of Seismic Forces at Bearing Level From Superstructure
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
Transverse Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
Vertical Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 96
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
MNB at Ch:121+255
At Bearing Level SL1 Max P Case

Longitudinal Seismic SL2 Max MT Case
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.12 54.12 0.00 25.01
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.12 52.14 0.00 24.51
Transverse Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.12 180.40 0.00 83.38
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.12 173.79 0.00 81.69
Vertical Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 44.53 -44.53 0.40 54.12 0.00 25.01
SL2 43.63 -43.63 0.40 52.14 0.00 24.51

Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.1 106.5 0.00 25.01
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.1 103.5 0.00 24.51
Transverse Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.1 355.1 0.00 83.38
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.1 345.0 0.00 81.69
Vertical Seismic
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
SL1 44.53 -44.53 0.4 106.5 0.00 25.01
SL2 43.63 -43.63 0.4 103.5 0.00 24.51

ML due ML due
Pmax Pmin
toe) toe)
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.0 -31.7 151.6 0.0 0.00 25.01
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.0 -31.0 147.6 0.0 0.00 24.51
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 97
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197 033
MNB at Ch:121+255
Transverse Seismic
ML due ML due
ML (about
to HL to P MT (about HL HT
Pmax Pmin footing c/l)
Load Case (about (about footing c/l) Seismic Seismic
due to HL
toe) toe)
SL1 13.36 -13.36 0.0 -31.7 505.2 0.0 0.00 83.38
SL2 13.09 -13.09 0.0 -31.0 495.0 0.0 0.00 81.69
Vertical Seismic
ML due ML due
Pmax Pmin
toe) toe)
SL1 44.53 -44.53 0.0 -105.6 151.6 0.0 0.00 25.01
SL2 43.63 -43.63 0.0 -103.5 148.5 0.0 0.00 24.51
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 98
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) - MNB at Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
SUMMARY:
Earth Pressure: Live Load Surcharge:
At Abutment Base: At Abutment Base:

Dimension of Toe+Abutment Stem = -3.1
ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 37.5 102.6 207.3 -116.3 LWL 0.0 51.2 123.2 0.0
HFL 37.8 103.6 198.8 -117.2 HFL 0.0 51.5 123.2 0.0

ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 58.8 161.4 304.3 -182.4 LWL 0.0 80.6 216.5 0.0
HFL 62.4 171.5 296.9 -193.6 HFL 0.0 83.3 214.0 0.0
At Foundation Bottom: At Foundation Bottom:

ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 70.8 193.7 537.9 -219.6 LWL 0.0 70.4 232.6 0.0
HFL 68.2 192.9 462.9 -211.3 HFL 0.0 72.3 234.7 0.0

ML due ML due
P HL P HL
toe toe
LWL 111.1 304.8 789.8 -344.4 LWL 0.0 110.8 408.8 0.0
HFL 126.9 362.0 776.5 -393.3 HFL 0.0 127.7 413.4 0.0
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 103
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment & foundation for A2 (Free) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterje 17-12-2018
10 Calculation of Forces on Abutment and Foundation
Abutment dimensions (square) are shown below
0.3 1.29
0.4 3.06
2.28 0.85 4.46045
c 0.80 0.00
1.18
a HFL
0.90
0.35
0.80
0.00 d
0.00 1.80
1.80
1.98 1.98
4.76
C.G. Cl of Fdn
Width of abutment b = 16.00 m Width of pilecap = 16.00 m
Return Wall is on 2 side b/cos q = 17.6540467 m b/cos q = 17.65 m
Normal Case
Moments about c/l of foundation
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
104
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
"e" fro mC/L
Horizontal Lever Arm Hor.Lever Arm ML about ML about ML about
Component Weight ML of
from shaft at bottom c/l from toe toe C/L C/L
foundation
t m t-m m t-m m t-m t-m
Standard Dirt Wall Bracket 5.96 1.561 9.3 3.94 23.5 -1.84 -11.0 0.0
Dirt Wall 40.58 1.428 57.9 3.81 154.6 -1.43 -57.9 0.0
Abutment Cap
94.00 0.439 41.3 2.82 265.1 -0.44 -41.3 0.0
(uniform)
Abutment Cap
0.00 0.000 0.0 2.82 0.0 -0.04 0.0 0.0
(varying)
Abutment Shaft 31.62 0.000 0.0 2.38 75.3 0.00 0.0 0.0
Total 172.2 108.5 518.5 -110.2 0.0
Hor. eccentricity of weight of substructure from c/l of bearing = 0.63 m
Width of abutment shaft at HFL = 0.8 m

3
Voume of abutment shaft submerged in water = 4.5 m
Buoyancy on abutment shaft = -4.48 t
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy about toe = -10.7 t-m
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy about C/l of foundation = 0.0 t-m
Seismic Case
Weight Full Design Seismic Forces
Component
t r1 r2 r3
Dirt Wall Bracket 6.0 1.1 1.3 0.7
Dirt Wall 40.6 7.3 9.1 4.9
Abutment Cap
94.0 16.9 21.1 11.3
(uniform)
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(varying)
Abutment Shaft 31.6 5.7 7.1 3.8
Foundation 378.4 68.1 85.0 45.4
θ is skew angle Put % of Exposed pile cap where seismic force to be considered 1
Longitudinal Seismic C/L of abutment shaft C/L of foundation

Horizontal
(r1*cosθ+0.3r HT (r1*sinθ+0.3r2*cosθ) V (0.3r3) Arm from shaft Arm from ML due to V MT MT
c/l
Dirt Wall Bracket 1.1 0.4 0.2 1.56 4.6 4.9 0.3 1.8 -2 6.38 7 0 3 Match Line
Dirt Wall 7.3 2.7 1.5 1.43 3.3 23.9 2.1 9.0 -1 5.08 37 -2 14
Abutment Cap
16.9 6.3 3.4 0.44 1.3 22.3 1.5 8.4 20
(uniform) 0 3.12 53 -1
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
(varying) 0 2.70 0 0
Abutment Shaft 5.7 2.1 1.1 0.00 0.4 2.5 0.0 1.0 0 2.25 13 0 5
Foundation 68.1 25.5 13.6 0 0.90 61 0 23
Total at shaft 31.0 11.6 6.2 53.7 3.9 20.1 171 -4 64
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
105
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Vert. Lever
Hor.Lever Arm from Arm from
ML due to HL (about toe) ML due to V (about toe) MT
toe foundation
bottom
m m t-m t-m t-m
3.94 6.4 6.8 0.8 2.6
3.81 5.1 37.1 5.6 13.9
2.82 3.1 52.8 9.5 19.8
2.38 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.38 2.2 12.8 2.7 4.8
109.5 18.7 41.0
Transverse Seismic C/L of foundation

Horizontal
(0.3r1*cosθ+r HT (0.3r1*sinθ+r2*cosθ) V (0.3r3) Arm from shaft Arm from ML due to V MT MT
c/l
Match Line
Dirt Wall 2.2 9.1 1.5 1.43 3.3 7.2 2.1 29.9 -1.43 5.08 11.127521 -2.0859608 46.30039675
Abutment Cap
5.1 21.1 3.4 0.44 1.3 6.7 1.5 27.9 65.91048788
(uniform) -0.44 3.12 15.840476 -1.4854019
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
(varying) -0.04 2.70 0 0
Abutment Shaft 1.7 7.1 1.1 0.00 0.4 0.8 0.0 3.2 0.00 2.25 3.8385646 0 15.9718477
Foundation 20.4 85.0 13.6 0.00 0.90 18.388296 0 76.51168959
Total at shaft 29.7 38.7 6.2 16.1 3.9 67.1 51 -4 213
Vert. Lever
Hor.Lever Arm from
bearing c/l
shaft bottom
m m t-m t-m t-m
3.94 6.4 2.1 0.8 8.5
3.81 5.1 11.1 5.6 46.3
2.82 3.1 15.8 9.5 65.9
2.38 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.38 2.2 3.8 2.7 16.0
32.9 18.7 136.7
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
106
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Vertical Seismic C/L of foundation

Horizontal
HT ML due to Lever Arm Vert. Lever Arm from ML due to ML due to
(0.3r1*cosθ+0 V (r3) Arm from shaft Arm from ML due to V MT MT
Component (0.3r1*sinθ+0.3r2*cosθ) HL from shaft shaft bottom HL V
.3r2*sinθ) c/l shaft bottom
c/l
Match Line
Dirt Wall 2.2 2.7 4.9 1.43 3.3 7.2 7.0 9.0 -1.43 5.08 11.127521 -6.9532026 13.89011903
Abutment Cap
5.1 6.3 11.3 0.44 1.3 6.7 5.0 8.4 19.77314637
(uniform) -0.44 3.12 15.840476 -4.9513396
Abutment Cap
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
(varying) -0.04 2.70 0 0
Abutment Shaft 1.7 2.1 3.8 0.00 0.4 0.8 0.0 1.0 0.00 2.25 3.8385646 0 4.791554311
Foundation 20.4 25.5 45.4 0.0 0.90 18.388296 0 22.95350688
Total at shaft 9.3 11.6 20.7 16.1 13.0 20.1 51 -13 64
Vert. Lever
Hor.Lever Arm from
bearing c/l
shaft bottom
m m t-m t-m t-m
3.94 6.4 2.1 2.8 2.6
3.81 5.1 11.1 18.5 13.9
2.82 3.1 15.8 31.8 19.8
2.82 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.38 2.2 3.8 9.0 4.8
32.9 62.2 41.0
Summary of Forces at Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

Normal Case
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0 0 0
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0 0 0
Buoyancy -4.48 -4.48 0 0 0 0
Seismic Case
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 49.8 20.1 31.0 11.6
Substr.
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
107
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 49.8 20.1 31.0 11.6
Substr.
Transverse Seismic
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 12.2 67.1 29.7 38.7
Substr.
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 12.2 67.1 29.7 38.7
Substr.
Vertical Seismic
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.7 -20.7 3.1 20.1 9.3 11.6
Substr.
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 108.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -4.5 -4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.7 -20.7 3.1 20.1 9.3 11.6
Substr.
End of Summary of Forces at Abutment Shaft Bottom Level
Calculation of Weight of foundation

Rectangular Part
Volume = 151.344 m3
Weight = 378.36 t
Trapezoidal Part
Volume = 0.0 m3
Weight = 0t
3
Total Volume of foundation = 151.3 m
Total Weight of foundation = 378.36 t
Buoyancy force on foundation = -151.344 t
Lever arm from toe = 2.38 m

Moment due to wt. Of foundation about toe = 901.0 t-m
Moment due to buoyancy force on foundation about toe ML = -360.4 t-m
Moment about c/l of foundation = 0.0 t-m
Moment due to buyoyancy about c/l of foundation = 0.0 t-m
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
108
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Calculation for Return Wall
ML about
t m t-m m t-m
a 8.5 4.36 37.2 -2.0 -16.9 -1.76717728
b 2.3 3.37 7.8 -1.0 -2.3
c 0.0 3.57 0.0 -1.2 0.0
d 0.0 4.10 0.0 -1.7 0.0
Total 10.9 45.0 -19.2
Horizontal eccentricity of CG of return wall from toe in longitudinal direction = 4.1 m

Transverse Moment due to wt. of return wall MT = 84.7 t-m
Submerged height of return wall in HFL case upto foundation top level = 0.35 m
Submerged volume of return wall = 0.61 m3
Buoyancy force on return wall = -0.61 t
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy force on return wall about toe = -2.5 t-m
Transverse moment due to buoyancy about centerline of footing = -4.774549 t-m
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy force on return wall about C/L of foundation = 1 t-m
Calculation for Backfill Weight

Width of backfill in transverse direction (Skew) = 16.8 m
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
109
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
LWL
ML about
t m t-m m t-m
a 116.7 4.36 508.8 -2.0 -231.0
b 31.8 3.37 107.3 -1.0 -31.5
c 0.00 3.57 0.0 -1.2 0.0
d 0.00 4.10 0.0 -1.7 0.0
Total 148.5 616.1 -262.5
HFL
ML about
t m t-m m t-m
a 112.0 4.36 488.2 -2.0 -221.6
b 26.3 3.37 88.7 -1.0 -26.0
c 0.00 3.57 0.0 -1.2 0.0
d 0.00 4.10 0.0 -1.7 0.0
Total 138.3 576.9 -247.7
Summary of Forces at Foundation Bottom Level
Normal Case
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0 0 -110.2 0.0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.36 378.36 0 0 0.0 0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0 0 -19.2 0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 148.5 148.5 0 0 -262.5 0

ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Buoyancy on substr. -4.48 -4.48 0.0 -10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 -4.48 -4.48 0 0 0.0 0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.36 378.36 0 0 0 0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0.0 -360.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 -151.344 -151.344 0 0 0.0 0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0 1.1
wall. -0.61 -0.61 0 0 0
Backfill Wt. 138.3 138.3 0.0 576.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 138.3 138.3 0 0 -247.7 0
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
110
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
Seismic Case
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 -109.5 -18.7 41.0 31.0 11.6 19.8 -19.8 99.1 37.1 167 64
Substr.
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 148.5 148.5 0.0 0.0 -262.5 0.0

ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 -109.5 -18.7 41.0 31.0 11.6
Substr. 19.8 -19.8 99.1 37.1 167 64
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0 -360.4 0 0 0 -151.3 -151.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0
wall. -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 138.3 138.3 0.0 0.0 -247.7 0.0
Transverse Seismic
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 -32.9 -18.7 41.0 29.7 38.7
Substr. 19.8 -19.8 29.7 123.7 47 213
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 148.5 148.5 0.0 0.0 -262.5 0.0
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
111
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Seismic Force on
6.2 -6.2 -32.9 -18.7 41.0 29.7 38.7
Substr. 19.8 -19.8 29.7 123.7 47.3 213.2
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0 -360.40 0 0 0 -151.3 -151.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0
wall. -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 138.3 138.3 0.0 0.0 -247.7 0.0
Vertical Seismic
ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.7 -20.7 -32.9 -62.2 41.0 9.3 11.6
Substr. 66.1 -66.1 29.7 37.1 38 64
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 148.5 148.5 0.0 0.0 -262.5 0.0

ML due to P
Weight of Substr. 172.2 172.2 0.0 518.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.2 172.2 0.0 0.0 -110.2 0.0
Seismic Force on
20.7 -20.7 -32.9 -62.2 41.0 9.3 11.6
Substr. 66.1 -66.1 29.7 37.1 38.0 64.0
Weight of fdn 378.4 378.4 0.0 901.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 378.4 378.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -151.34 -151.34 0.00 -360.40 0 0 0 -151.3 -151.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return Wall Wt. 10.9 10.9 0.0 45.0 84.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 -19.2 0.0
Buoyancy on Return
-0.6 -0.6 0.0 -2.5 -4.8 0.0 0.0
wall. -0.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
Backfill Wt. 148.5 148.5 0.0 616.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 138.3 138.3 0.0 0.0 -247.7 0.0
End of Summary of Forces at Foundation Bottom Level
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
112
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
033
12 DESIGN OF ABUTMENT SHAFT
T-T
As'
ML
L-L
0.8
MT
As
17.65m sk
Provision of Reinforcement
T direction
2
2
0 No. 20 mm
Spacing in Tansverse direction = 100 mm < 200.0 OK
L direction
2
2
Dia of Distribution Reinforcement = 12 mm

Effective Cover d' = 70 mm
Percentage of vertical reinforcement in shaft = 0.45% > 0.30% Ok Cl. 710.3.2,IRC:78-2014
P ML MT eL = ML/P eT = MT/P (eT/h )/(e (eT/he

eq
Check for P q)/(eL Check
t t-m t-m m m L/beq)
/beq)
Max P Case 905.9 873.9 34.2 0.96 0.04 0.85 1.17 Check interaction eqn.
P can be ignored
Min P Case 212.4 445.8 15.1 2.10 0.07 0.74 1.35 Check interaction eqn.
P can be ignored
Max ML
905.9 873.9 34.2 0.96 0.04 0.85 1.17 Check interaction eqn.
Min ML
231.7 444.6 0.0 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 No further check reqd
ULS and SLS Checks of Abutment Section
ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked using AdSec 8.2 (FAGUS software).
The output summary is attached in Appendix 1.
Under ULS, moment capacity of the section is checked.
Under SLS, stress and crack width are checked.
Load case 1 to 4 are for ULS

Load case 5 to 8 are for SLS stress check from Rare combination
Load case 9 to 12 are for SLS stress check from Quasi-permanent combination
ULS CASE FOR Fagus
P MT=MY ML=MZ HL HT max

LOAD CASE
kN kN-m kN-m
1 Max P Case 0.0 342.0 8738.7
2 Min P Case 0.0 151.0 4457.5 2531.51925
3 Max ML Case 0.0 342.0 8738.7 2284.232523
4 Min ML Case 0.0 0.0 4446.2
Maximum M/MU( As per Fagus CHECK) = 0.84 free cantilever design

Shear
Dia of links 10 mm
No. 90
Spacing 200 mm
total area mm^2/m 35342.91735
For Shear ( as per Fagus check = 0.56 governed by concrete
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
113
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
033
Summary of Critical Load Cases from Rare Combination
Permissible Stress for Concrete = 0.48fck = 16.8 MPa

Permissible Stress for Steel = 0.6fyk = -330 MPa
P ML MT
t t-m t-m
Max P Case 652.7 593.7 22.8
Min P Case 171.5 307.3 0.0

Min ML
171.5 307.3 0.0
Case
Max ML
652.7 593.7 22.8
Case
SLS CASE FOR Fagus_STRESS_CHECK

P MT=MY ML=MZ
LOAD CASE
kN kN-m kN-m
5 Max P Case 6526.6 228.0 5937.2

6 Min P Case 1714.9 0.0 3072.6
7 Min ML Case 1714.9 0.0 3072.6
8 Max ML Case 6526.6 228.0 5937.2
Maximum compressive stress in concrete = 5.8 Mpa

Minimum tensile stress in steel = -237 Mpa
Summary of Critical Load Cases from Quasi-permanent Combination (for crack width check)
Condition of exposure Moderate

Limiting Crack Width = 0.3 mm Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011
P ML MT
t t-m t-m
Max P Case 524.1 319.0 0.0
Min P Case 171.5 307.3 0.0

Min ML
171.5 307.3 0.0
Case
Max ML
524.1 319.0 0.0
Case
SLS CASE FOR OASYS_CRACK WIDTH_CHECK

P MT=MY ML=MZ
LOAD CASE
kN kN-m kN-m
9 Max P Case 5240.8 0.0 3189.6
10 Min P Case 1714.9 0.0 3072.6
11 Min ML Case 1714.9 0.0 3072.6
12 Max ML Case 5240.8 0.0 3189.6
Maximum crackwidth coming out from Fagus CHECK= 0.02 mm
Distribution Reinforcement
Distribution reinforcement = 0.25 % of gross area Cl. 710.3.4, IRC:78-2014
Distribution reinforcement per meter height = 2000 mm2/m
2
Distribution reinforcement per meter height on each face = 1000 mm /m
Provide 12 mm dia bars @90 mm c/c on each face
2
Ast,provided per meter height = 1256.6 mm /m OK
Minimum area of horizontal reinf. per meter = 25 % of Area of vertical reinf. or 0.001Ac whichever is greater
2
= 800.00 mm /m Cl. 16.3.2, IRC:112-2011
2
Total area of horizontal reinf. provided per meter = 2513.3 mm /m OK
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
114
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
033
Dia. Of bar = max(1/4*dia of vertical bar, 8mm)

= 8 mm Cl. 16.3.2, IRC:112-2011
> 12 mm OK
Maximum spacing = 200 mm 12 times the minimum diameter of
= 144 mm vertical bar
= 800 mm Least dimension of the column
> 90 mm OK
DUCTILE DETAILING FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE

AS PER SECTION 17 OF IRC:112-2011
Dimensions of abutment = 17.7m sk X 0.8
Maximum Axial force in seismic condition, NED = 8886.9 kN

Normalised Axial force = NED
Acfck
= 0.02
< 0.08
Confinement of compression zone not required
Grade of Steel = 550 MPa
Grade of Concrete = 35 MPa
fyd = 478.3 MPa
fcd = 15.6 MPa
Long. Reinf. Provided in abutment

Total Asl = 55292.0307 mm2
Ac = 14123237.36 mm2
Reinforcement ratio of long. Reinf.
ρL = 0.004
2
Area of confined core ACC = 11377630.4 mm
ωw,req = 0.0083
For rectangular sections
Minimum confining reinforcement
ωwd.c ≥ max(ωw,req ; 0.12)
ωwd.c ≥ 0.12
Provide dia of confining reinf. = 10 mm
Spacing of confining reinforcement, SL (Cl. 17.2.1.3 of IRC:112-2011)
SL1 = 5*Dia of smallest longitudinal bar = 80 mm

SL2 = 1/5th of dia of core upto hoop c/l = 130 mm
Minimum spacing of confining reinforcement = 80 mm
Provide spacing SL = 80 mm
OK
For rectangular section in one direction
Volumetric ratio of hoop reinforcement relative to concrete core
2
Area of hoop bar Asp = 6911.5 mm
ρw = Asw
SL.b
= 0.005
Confining reinforcement provided

ωwd = ρwfyd/fcd
= 0.150 OK
No. of links = 88 No.
Spacing in transverse direction = 100 mm
Provide 10 mm dia hoops at spacing @80 mm c/c
Minimum Spacing in transverse direction = 225 mm 1/3 of the least domension of

= 200 mm concrete core or 200mm
OK
Depth of section = 800 mm
Distance from the point of maximum design moment to the
point where design moment is 80% of the max moment = 419.13 mm
Design length of potential plastic hinge Lh = 800.00 mm
Therefore confining reinforcement will be provided over a length of = 800.00 mm above founding top level
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
115
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-033
West Bengal Designed By: Checked By: Date
Abutment design
FAGUS
SECTION PROPERTIES
RESULTS
116
UR :
For Moment: 0.84 OK

For Shear: 0.27 OK governed by concrete
STRESS RESULTS
Stress in concrete -5.7

Stress in steel 237 Mpa
CRACK CHECK
117

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Ch:121+255
12.0 Design of Stem
Length of stem 17.65 m
Thickness of stem bottom 0.8 m
Maximum Vertical axial force at stem bottom 1 T
Gross area of stem at bottom 14.12 m2
Axial stress in wall 0.00 mpa
Grade of concrete M 35
Axial stress is less than 0.1fck 3.5
Hence design as cantilever slab no need to check slanderness ratio
Height of the wall 5.076
Effective length factor with elastomeric bearing in top 1.3
Thickness of wall 0.8
Slanderness ratio 8.25
Design as slender column
Design compressive strength 15.61
Design force summary
Case ULS 1 ULS 2 SLS Rare 1 SLS QP 1 SLS Rare 2 SLS QP 2 Seismic 1 Seismic 2
P (T) 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
ML (T-M) 870 0 591 317 1 1 1 1
MT (T-M) 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
V (T) 253 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Material property
Grade of reinforcement = 550
fyk = 550 Mpa
fck = 35
fcm = 45
Ecm = 32308 Mpa
Fyd = 440 Mpa
Clear cover = 75 mm
Ecm for short tem loading = 32308 Mpa
Ecm for long term loading = 16154 Mpa
fcteff = 2.77 Mpa
fcd = 15.61 Mpa
Creep factor φ = 1
εcu2 = 0.0035 mm

SLS rare = 16.8 Mpa
SLS QP = 12.6 Mpa

SLS rare = 330 Mpa
SLS QP = 330 Mpa
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 118

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Ch:121+255
800
1000
ULS Capacity check
Section Sec 1 Sec 2
MED (T-M) 49 0.1
b (mm) 1000 1000
D (mm) 800 800
d (mm) 717 719
φ1 (mm) 16 12
s1 (mm) 100 100
φ2 (mm) 0 0
s2 (mm) 150 150
Ast (mm2) 2011 1131
Xumax (mm) 318 319
Xu (mm) Xu = (0.87*fyk*Ast)/(0.36*fck) 76 43
Check 1 OK OK
Astcal (mm2) Astcal =M/0.87*fyk*(d'-0.416 Xu) 1503 2
Check 2 OK OK
Ast min As per cl 16.5.1.1 IRC-112 939 942
Check 3 Ok Ok
ΔFd (T) 7.17 0.00
MED/Z + ΔFd 79.1 0.1
MRD (T-M) MRD = 0.87*fyk*Ast*(d-0.416 Xu) 65.93 37.94
Check 4 OK OK
MRD/Z 96 54
Check 5 Ok Ok 0.822188
12 φ 100 C/C 1131.0 mm2
Ok
Secondary transverse reinforcement 402 mm2
12 φ 100 C/C 1131 mm2
Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 119

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Ch:121+255
Section section 1 Section 2 Section Section 1 Section 2
VED 14 0 VED 14 0
β 1 1 b 1000 1000
βVED 14 0 deff 717 719
deff 717 719 z 645.3 647.1
b 1000 1000 αcw 1.00 1
k k=min(1+sqrt(200/d),2) 1.53 1.53 ν1 0.53 0.53
VRDmax
ρ=min((Ast/b/deff),0.0
=αcw*b*z*
2)
ρ 0.0028 0.0016 VRDmax v1*fcd/2 268 269
νmin=0.031k^(3/2)*fck
νmin 0.346 0.346 Check 7 Ok Ok
σcp 0.00 0 θactual 1.53 0.00
VRDC VRDC=(max(((0.12*k*( 25.96 24.89 θadopted 45° 45°
ΔFd (T) =
0.5*Ved*co
Check 6 Ok Ok ΔFd (T) tθ 7.2 0.0
SLS Stress check

sec 1 sec 2 Section 1 Section 2
Load comb Rare QP Rare QP Creep coefficient φ 1 1
MED (T-M) 33 18 0 0 Mst = Mrare-MQP 16 0
b (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 Eceff =Ecm*(Mrare)/Mst+(1+φ)*MQP21029 16154
D (mm) 800 800 800 800 mqp = Es/ Ecm 6.2 6.2
d (mm) 717 717 719 719 mrare =Es/Eceff 9.5 12.4
Ast (mm2) 2011 2011 1131 1131
m 10 6 12 6
N. A.(x) 148 122 129 94
INA 7.27E+09 5.01E+09 5.59E+09 3.01E+09
Comp stress 6.80 4.36 0.01 0.02
Comp Perm. 16.80 12.60 16.80 12.60
Check 1 OK Ok Ok Ok
Tensile stress 249 132 1 1
Tensile Perm. 330 330 330 330
Check 2 OK Ok Ok Ok h k
0 1
Crack Width Check 0.3 1
For minimum Ast requirement for crak control 0.8 0.65
Section Sec 1 Sec 2 3 0.65
b 1000 1000
h 800 800
d 717 719 Srequired 200
Acteff Acteff =min(h/2,(h-N.A) 207500.0 202500.0 Check Ok
σst 160 160 Check for maximum
fcteff 2.9 2.9 spacing b/w bars
k 0.65 0.65 Load comb
kc 0.4 0.4 φ 16
As, min As,min=k*kc*fcteff/σst 978 954 C 75
As provided 2011 1131 Sprovided 150
Check Ok Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 120

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Ch:121+255
Load comb
heff heff=min(2.5(h-d),(h- 207.5 202.5
b 1000 1000
Aceff Aceff = heff*b 207500 202500
Asprovided 2011 1131
ρpeff ρpeff =As/Aceff 0.010 0.006
k1 0.800 0.800
k2 0.500 0.500
σsc 132 1
N.A 122 94
kt 0.5 0.5
αe εm =max(((σsc- 6 6
εm (kt*(fcteff/ρpeff)*(1+α 0.00040 0.00000
Wk 0.212 0.001
Check Ok Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 121
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
13.1 Design of Pile Foundation - Base Pressure
4.8
Pile cap = 1.80 m
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m -1.631, 8.71
Pile diameter = 1.20 m 1.631, 7.18
-1.631, 4.73 MT
16 1.631, 3.21
3
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m B B
-1.631, 0.76
Self weight of Pile cap = 378 t
1.631, -0.76
Length of pile = 17.0 m -1.631, -
-1.631, -
Loads on Pile 7.18 1.631, -8.71
Normal Seismic A
Maximum Pile Load = 153 t. OK 175 OK Max. horizontal load on pile = 28.92 T OK
Minimum Pile Load = 49 t. OK 12 OK
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 122
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197

Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
Type of Load case Sr no Pile capacity from soil investigation report = 530 t 662.5
Normal Load case 1 to 3 Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 100 t 125

no. (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
Comb 1
1
1190 23 476 288 0 119 29 1 149 89 29 134
L
W 2
L 1152 413 469 286 0 115 29 9 153 77 29 134
H 3
F 1023 23 419 289 0 102 26 1 129 76 29 135
L
4
986 413 412 287 0 99 25 9 133 64 29 134
SD-LWL 5
710 0 146 194 0 71 9 0 79.94 62 19 90
SD-HFL 6
543 0 87 193 0 54 5 0 59.65 49 19 90
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 123
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Seismic
7
1030 220 1054 554 62 103 65 5 173 33 56 260
LWL - L
8
1023 294 1053 554 62 102 65 7 173 31 56 260
9 1030 723 893 461 207 103 55 16 174 32 50 236
LWL - T
10 1023 791 891 460 205 102 55 18 175 30 50 235
11 926 220 881 461 62 93 54 5 151 34 46 217
LWL - V
12 919 295 879 460 62 92 54 7 152 31 46 217
13 863 220 1061 628 62 86 65 5 156 16 63 295
HFL - L
14 856 294 1060 628 62 86 65 7 157 14 63 295
15 863 723 900 535 207 86 55 16 157.67 15 57 268
HFL - T
16 856 791 898 534 205 86 55 18 158.38 13 57 267
17 759 220 888 535 62 76 54 5 135.24 17 54 251
HFL - V
18
753 295 886 534 62 75 54 7 136.20 14 54 251
SD-LWL-L 19
683 64 623 439 37 68 38 1 107.95 29 44 205
SD-LWL-T 20 683 213 462 345 124 68 28 5 101.39 35 37 171
SD-LWL-V 21 621 64 449 345 37 62 28 1 91.05 33 35 162
SD-HFL-L 22 516 64 626 496 37 52 38 1 91.44 12 50 232
SD-HFL-T 23 516 213 464 402 124 52 28 5 84.88 18 42 196
SD-HFL-V 24 454 64 452 402 37 45 28 1 74.54 16 40 189
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 124
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197

Design of Pile Foundation -ULS CASE
4.8
Pile cap = 1.80 m
Pile diameter = 1.20 m 8.705 1.631, 7.18
-1.631,
16.0 MT
4.732 1.631, 3.21
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m3 B -1.631, B

Self weight of Pile cap = 378 t 0.76 1.631, -
Total Length L1+Lf = 11 m 0.76
Length of pile = 17.0 m -1.631, -
Reduction factor for pile B.M= 0.87 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5) 3.211 1.631, -
4.73
-1.631, - 1.631, -
7.18 8.71
Loads on Pile
Normal Seismic A
Maximum Pile Load = 214 t. 200 Max. horizontal load on pile = 61.70 T
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 125
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197

Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
1 x 321.3 44.7

load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/
no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) 2 (T-m)
Comb 1
L
1 1599 34 703 411 0 160 43 1 204 116 41 192
W
L 2 1575 620 692 408 0 158 42 14 214 101 41 191
H 3 1595 34 613 412 0 159 38 1 198 121 41 192
F
L 4 1538 620 602 409 0 154 37 14 205 103 41 191
SD-LWL 5 958 0 278 291 0 96 17 0 112.87 79 29 136
SD-HFL 6 921 0 185 289 0 92 11 0 103.48 81 29 135
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 126
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Comb 2
L
1 1200 30 666 353 0 120 41 1 162 79 35 165
W
L 2 1176 537 656 351 0 118 40 12 170 65 35 164
H 3 1191 30 586 354 0 119 36 1 156 82 35 165
F
L 4 1142 537 576 352 0 114 35 12 161 67 35 164
SD-LWL 5 710 0 307 252 0 71 19 0 89.84 52 25 118
SD-HFL 6 676 0 225 251 0 68 14 0 81.41 54 25 117
Seismic
7 1388 441 704 532 126 139 43 10 192 86 55 255

LWL - L
8 1381 511 702 532 125 138 43 11 193 84 55 255
9 1388 1459 462 392 419 139 28 33 200 78 57 268
LWL - T
10 1381 1517 460 392 416 138 28 34 200 76 57 267
11 1231 441 444 392 126 123 27 10 160 86 41 192
LWL - V
12 1225 513 442 392 125 123 27 11 161 84 41 192
13 1351 441 712 593 126 135 44 10 189 82 61 283
HFL - L
14 1344 511 710 593 125 134 44 11 189 79 61 283
15 1351 1459 470 453 419 135 29 33 196 74 62 288
HFL - T
16 1344 1517 468 452 416 134 29 34 197 72 61 287
17 1194 441 451 453 126 119 28 10 157 82 47 219
HFL - V
18 1188 513 450 452 125 119 28 11 158 80 47 219
SD-LWL-L 19 938 65 430 405 38 94 26 1 122 66 41 190
SD-LWL-T 20 938 216 309 335 125 94 19 5 118 70 36 167
SD-LWL-V 21 891 65 299 335 38 89 18 1 109 69 34 157
SD-HFL-L 22 901 65 437 462 38 90 27 1 118 62 46 217
SD-HFL-T 23 901 216 316 392 125 90 19 5 114 66 41 192
SD-HFL-V 24 854 65 306 392 38 85 19 1 106 65 39 184
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 127
Document
LOUIS BERGER No.
4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No. 4800197
Note:
1 The Load combination presented above is calculated in accordance with Table 3.4 of notification No. 78-Amendment to IRC 6:2017 with unfactored loads. For load
combination no. 7 - 24 (Seismic Loads combination) is taken as 1.35 times the force transmitted to it by substrucure as per clause 219.8 of IRC 6:2017.
For Deflection calculation,as per Clause No:709.3.5.2 of Amendment to IRC:78-2014, Combination -I is only considered for checking of deflections and not
2
considered in other load combinations.
3 For load combination no. 7 - 24 (Seismic Loads combination) pile capacity is increased by 35% .

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
I 4
= Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm= 1.02E+07 cm4
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - = 41.2 t
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - = 61.7 t
T = (321100 * 24850489 / 0.525) ^ 0.2 ) = 366.8 cm

= 3.2 m
L1 / T = 321.0 / 366.8 = 0.9
Lf = = 752.04 cm
= 7.521 m
3
= Q * (L1 + Lf) / (12[pile
Y * E head
= 1.30 cm
13.0 mm

where
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 128
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
13 14 Design of Pile Foundation
1 14.0 Design of Pile Foundation - SLS COMBINATIONS
6.3
Pile cap = 1.80 m
Pile diameter = 1.20 m 8.705 1.631, 7.18
-1.631,
6.3 MT
4.732 1.631, 3.21
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m 3 B -1.631, 0.76 B
Self weight of Pile cap = 378 t 1.631, -0.76
Length of pile = 17.0 m -1.631, -
Reduction factor for pile B.M = 0.82 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5) 3.211 1.631, -4.73
-1.631, -
7.18 1.631, -8.71
Loads on Pile
Normal Seismic A
Maximum Pile Load = 150 t. 0 Max. horizontal load on pile = 27.47 T OK

Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
1 x 321.3 44.7
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
129
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033

no. (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
Rare
1
1166 23 430 274 0 117 26 1 143 90 27 121
L
W 2
L 1153 413 422 272 0 115 26 9 150 80 27 120
R
a H 3
F 1157 23 372 275 0 116 23 1 139 92 27 121
r
L
e 4
1119 413 364 273 0 112 22 9 143 80 27 120
SD-LWL 5
710 0 146 194 0 71 9 0 79.94 62 19 85
SD-HFL 6
676 0 86 193 0 68 5 0 72.89 62 19 85
QP
Q 1
L 1030 0 149 194 0 103 9 0 112 94 19 85
u
a W
2
s L 1054 0 149 194 0 105 9 0 115 96 19 85
i
H 3
1021 0 89 193 0 102 5 0 108 97 19 85
F
_
L 4
P
1021 0 89 193 0 102 5 0 108 97 19 85
e
r SD-LWL 5
m 710 0 146 194 0 71 9 0 79.94 62 19 85
a
SD-HFL 6
n 676 0 86 193 0 68 5 0 72.89 62 19 85

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm 2 = 321100 kg/cm 2
I 4
= Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm = 1.02E+07 cm 4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1 = 0.49 kg/cm 3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - NORMAL = 27.5 t
T = (321100 * 24850489 / 0.525) ^ 0.2 ) = 367.1 cm

= 3.2 m
L1 / T = 321.0 / 367.1 = 0.9
Lf = 2.55 * 432.9 = 752.55 cm

= 7.526 m
Y = Q * (L1 + Lf)3 / (12[pile head
* E * I) deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.87 cm
8.7 mm

where
A2_Fr-121+255_skew
130
Document No.
LOUIS BERGER
Job No. 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Ch:121+255
Design forces for Pile - ULS Case
1 -1160 1919 0 411 0
2 -1013 1905 0 408 0
3 -1211 1924 0 412 0
4 -1031 1911 0 409 0
5 -788 1356 0 291 0
6 -807 1351 0 289 0
7 -785 1650 0 353 0
8 -653 1638 0 351 0
9 -825 1654 0 354 0
10 -669 1642 0 352 0
11 -521 1176 0 252 0
12 -538 1171 0 251 0
13 -858 2554 0 547 0
14 -836 2551 0 546 0
15 -779 2679 0 574 0
ULS
16 -760 2667 0 571 0
17 -861 1922 0 412 0
18 -840 1919 0 411 0
19 -816 2830 0 606 0
20 -794 2827 0 606 0
21 -737 2880 0 617 0
22 -718 2868 0 614 0
23 -819 2193 0 470 0
24 -798 2190 0 469 0
25 -660 1899 0 407 0
26 -701 1669 0 358 0
27 -694 1573 0 337 0
28 -619 2165 0 464 0
29 -659 1921 0 412 0
30 -652 1839 0 394 0
Pile dia 1.20 m

1st layer 2nd layer
Dia of Bar 25 mm Dia of Bar 25 mm
No. of bars 21 No. of bars 21
Total Ast 20616.70 mm^2
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 131
FAGUS:
Section properties
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 132
Results:
UR
Moment Capacity 0.9 ok
Shear 0.85 ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 133
Rare combination
1 -897 1206 0 274 0
2 -802 1198 0 272 0
3 -924 1209 0 275 0
Rare
4 -804 1201 0 273 0
5 -620 853 0 194 0
6 -623 849 0 193 0
Stress
Concrete 8.3 Mpa ok
Steel 158 Mpa ok
Stress Check critical results
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 134
Quasi Permanent combination
1 -939 853 0 194 0
2 -963 853 0 194 0
3 -966 849 0 193 0
QP
4 -966 849 0 193 0
5 -620 853 0 194 0
6 -623 849 0 193 0
Crack width critical case
crack width 0.14 mm ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 135

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
15. DESIGN OF DIRTWALL
In the design of dirtwall the total height cosidered has been calculated taking into account a
slope of 2.5% provided in the carriageway.
For Backfill Soil :
0.30 Ka = 0.279
3.065 g = 1.80 t/m3
2 1
Eq. Height of surcharge = 1.2 m
1.539 t/m2 0.603 t/m2
Earth Pressure diagram
Height of dirtwall = 3.065 m
2
1 Earth Pressure due to surcharge = 0.603 t/m
2
2 Earth Pressure due to backfill of earth Rare = 1.539 t/m
ULS factor for earth pressure 1.5 SLS factor for earth pressure 1.3
ULS factor for live load 1.5 SLS factor for live load 1.3
QP
SLS factor for earth pressure 1
SLS factor for live load surcharge 0.8
SLS factor for live load 0
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to surcharge (1) = 2.83 t-m/m
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (2) = 3.04 t-m/m
Shear at the base of dirtwall due to surcharge (1) = 1.85 t/m

Shear at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (2) = 2.36 t/m
Calculation of force and moment due to the effect of braking :(cosidering 40t -Boggie loading)
1.7
10.0t 10.0t
3.06 2.79m
1.700 2.79 3.065
Effective width = 7.55 m

Braking force, 0.2*10*2 = 4 t
Braking force per metre width = 0.53 t/m
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to effect of braking = 1.62 t-m/m
SLS QP Bending moment = 5.30 t-m/m

SLS Rare Bending moment = 8.89 t-m/m
ULS bending moment = 10.38 t-m/m
ULS shear force at d effective = 6.55 t/m
Material property
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 136

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Grade of reinforcement = Fe 550
fyk = 550 Mpa
fck = 35
fcm = 45
Ecm = 32308 Mpa
Fyd = 440 Mpa
Clear cover = 50 mm
Ecm for short tem loading = 32308.2497 Mpa
Ecm for long term loading = 16154.1249 Mpa
fcteff = 2.77 Mpa
fcd = 15.61 Mpa
Creep factor φ = 1.5
εcu2 = 0.0035 mm

SLS rare = 16.8 Mpa
SLS QP = 12.6 Mpa

SLS rare = 330 Mpa
SLS QP = 330 Mpa
300
1000
ULS Capacity check
Section
MED (T-M) 10.38
b (mm) 1000
D (mm) 300
d (mm) 242
φ (mm) 16
s (mm) 125
Ast (mm2) 1608
Xumax (mm) 107
Xu (mm) Xu = (0.87*fyk*Ast)/(0.36*fck*b) 61
Check 1 OK
Astcal (mm2) Astcal =M/0.87*fyk*(d'-0.416 Xu) 1002
Check 2 OK
Ast min As per cl 16.5.1.1 IRC-112 317
Check 3 Ok
ΔFd (T) 3.3
MED/Z + ΔFd 51.2
Check 4 OK
MRD/Z 77
Check 5 Ok
2
10 φ 100 C/C 785 mm
Ok
2
Secondary transverse reinforcement 322 mm
2
10 φ 100 C/C 785 mm
Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 137

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Section Section
VED 7 VED 7
β 1 b 1000
βVED 7 deff 242
deff 242 z 217.8
b 1000 αcw 1
k k=min(1+sqrt(200/d),2) 1.91 ν1 0.53
VRDmax
ρ=min((Ast/b/deff),0.02) =αcw*b*z*v1*
ρ 0.0066 VRDmax fcd/2 90
νmin νmin=0.031k^(3/2)*fck 0.484 Check 7 Ok
σcp 0 θactual 2.08
VRDC 14.55 + 0.15*σcp),(vmin+0.15*σcp)))*b*deff/10^4
VRDC=(max(((0.12*k*(80*ρ*fck)^0.33) θadopted 45°
ΔFd (T) =
Check 6 Ok ΔFd (T) 0.5*Ved*cotθ 3.3
SLS Stress check
sec 1 Section 1
Load comb Rare QP Creep coefficient φ 1.5
MED (T-M) 8.89 5.30 Mst = Mrare-MQP 4
b (mm) 1000 1000 Eceff =Ecm*(Mrare)/Mst+(1+φ)*MQP 17052
D (mm) 300 300 mqp = Es/ Ecm 6.2
d (mm) 242 242 mrare =Es/Eceff 11.7
φ (mm) 16 16
s (mm) 125 125
Ast (mm2) 1608 1608 h k
m 12 6 0 1
N. A.(x) 79 60 0.3 1
INA 6.66E+08 4.02E+08 0.8 0.65
Comp stress 10.49 7.94 3 0.65
Comp Perm. 16.80 12.60
Check 1 OK Ok
Tensile stress 256 148
Tensile Perm. 330 330
Check 2 OK Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 138

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Bengal
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Crack Width Check
Section
d 242 Srequired 250
Acteff Acteff =min(h/2,(h-N.A) /3, 79941.91 Check Ok
σst 2.5*(h-d))*b 160
fcteff 2.9
k 0.65
kc 0.4
As, min As,min=k*kc*fcteff/σst 377
As provided 1608
Check Ok
Load comb heff=min(2.5(h-d),(h-
heff x/3),h/2) 79.94 Check for maximum
b 1000 spacing b/w bars
Aceff Aceff = heff*b 79942 Load comb
Asprovided 1608 φ 16
ρpeff ρpeff =As/Aceff 0.020 C 50
k1 0.800 Sprovided 125
k2 0.500
Srmax Srmax=3.4c+0.17Φ/ρpeff 305.2
σsc 148
N.A 60
kt 0.5
αe εm =max(((σsc- 6
εm (kt*(fcteff/ρpeff)*(1+αe*ρpe 0.00045
Wk 0.136
Check Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 139
Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state
of West Bengal Designed by: Checked by Date
STRUCTURE: Design of abutment cap Vishal S.Chatterjee 17-12-2018
16.0 Design of Abutment Cap
The center line of the support lies within the abument wall width
Bearing pressure under the bearing is checked for satisfying the cube root formula :-
2
fcd = 15.61 N/mm for M35 grade,
Temporary bearing cenetricity 300 mm

Bearing size on elevation 350x 350 mm
dispersion angle of inclination 30 ° 700
radian 0.52
Loaded face edge distance from edge support
475 mm
Depth required to provide parallel r/f 823 mm
2
Uniform distribution of loadd area 122500 mm 850
2
Transferred bearing area 1102500 mm 1177.894
Frdu 573.67 Ton 300

Total load during construction 100 Ton
Ok
Depth of cap provided 850 mm
Ok 800
Therefore abutment cap has been designed as per Clause 716.2.1 , IRC :78- 2014
The abutment cap shall be reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel
Length of abutment cap 16.00 m

Width of abutment cap 2.277894 m
Depth of abutment cap for calculating minimum reinforcement 0.225 m
Reinforcement in the direction of length of abutment cap
2 2
Total Area of steel required (mm ) = 0.25 % in one direction 1281.3 mm
Steel provided at each face i.e top face and bottom face 12 nos. 12 dia
Area of steel provided (mm2) = 1357 mm

2
O.K.
Reinfocement in the direction at right angles to length of abutment cap
2 2
Area of steel required (mm )/m @ 0.25% 562.5 mm /m
Considering corbel detailing

ac 300 mm
Hc 850 mm
Follw detail 1
2
Minimum Aslink 339 mm /m
2
Provided 10 dia 6 leg stirrups 200 c/c 2356 mm
O.K.
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 140
17.0 DESIGN OF END RETURN WALL
1 Angle of Repose of Soil, f (in degrees) f= 30.0
2 Cohesion, C (in t/m2) C= 0.0
a = 5.600 3 Angle of Wall friction d= 20.0
gsub =
3
4 Density of Soil (submerged) , gsub (in t/m ) 1.00
5 Batter of wall with horizontal, a (in degrees) a= 90.00
6 Inclination of Backfill with horizontal, b (in degrees) b= 0.00
7 Equiv. Ht. of backfill earth for Live load surcharge (m) heb 1.2
For Coulomb's Theory Ka = 0.297
2 2 2
Ka = Sin (a+f)/ [Sin a sin (a-d) {1+ sqrt ((Sin(f+d).Sin (f-b))/(Sin (a-d).Sin(a+b)))} ]
For Rankine's Theory Ka = 0.333
'
Ka =
b = 5.700
8 Active Earth pressure Coefficient 0.297
ka = 0.279 KaH = 0.279
g = 1.80 KaV = 0.102
ULS factor for earth pressure 1.5 SLS factor for earth pressure 1
Grade of Concrete M 35 QP
Grade of steel 550 SLS factor for earth pressure 1
SLS factor for live load surcharge 0
Q2=ka*g*h
Q1=ka*g*SHt
The end return wall has been designed as a plate fixed on its two faces i.e. at the base and on one of its vertical sides.
( Refer Table 26 of Formula of Stress & Strain by Roark & Young ).

Height of Length of g1 g2
S.NO. return wall (m) return wall "a/b" (at x=a & z=0) Mb1 (t-
2
Q1 (t/m ) b1 b2 (at x=0 & z=b) Ma1 (t-m/m)
"b" (m) "a" m/m)
1 5.7 5.60 0.98 0.603 1.732 1.728 1.179 1.158 -5.65 -5.64
"a/b" Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

Q2 (t/m2) b1 b2 (at x=a & z=0) Mb2 (t-
g1 g2 (at x=0 & z=0.6b) Ma2 (t-m/m)
m/m)
0.98 2.863 0.684 0.389 0.558 0.195 -10.60 -6.02
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 141
Design of end return wall

Ultimate
Moment in
Moment in ulltimate moment of moment of
thk. of end thk. of end Deff thk. of return at horizontal
vertical resistance in vertical N A depth resistance in
return wall N A depth Deff provided return wall at provided 0.6H direction(Mh)
direction(Mv) dir. (Mu) tm horizontal dir.
at top bottom ULS
ULS -' ™ (Mu) tm
400 119 315 400 -22.69 40 76 317 400 -15.80 27
lever arm z 264.89 OK OK

Lever arm at 0.6Z 284.93
Vertical reinforcement Horizontal reinforcement

Earth face Outer face Earth face Outer face
spacing
bar dia spacing bar dia
provided
20 f @ 100 c/c 12 f @ 100 c/c 16 f @ 100 c/c 12 f @ 100 c/c
Ast provided (vertical) = 3141.59 mm2 Ast provided (horizontal) = 2010.62 mm2 1130.97 mm2
CHECK FOR SHEAR

b1 b2 g1 g2
2
Q1 (t/m ) (at x=0 & z=0.8b) R2 (t-m/m2)
(t/m)
0.982 0.603 1.732 1.728 1.179 1.158 3.827 3.758
Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

b1 b2 g1 g2
2
Q2 (t/m ) (at x=0 & z=0.6b) R4 (t-m/m2)
(t/m)
0.982 2.704 0.684 0.389 0.558 0.195 8.132 2.835
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 142
At x = a & z = 0 At x = a & z At x = 0 & z

=0 = 0.6*b
D 400 400 mm
Grade of Concrete M 35 M 35
Deff 315 315 mm
Design Shear Force V 16.79 9.04 (t/m)
Check for Check for shear Check for maximum shear capacity
Check for shear maximum Load Comb 0.6H Load Comb At 0.6H
Load Comb Load Comb At base VED 9.04 VED 9.0
VED 16.79 VED 16.79 β 1 b 1000
β 1 b 1000 βVED 9.04 deff 315
βVED 16.79 deff 315 deff 315 z 283.5
deff 315 z 283.5 b 1000 αcw 1
b 1000 αcw 1 k 1.80 ν1 0.53
VRDmax
=αcw*b*z*v1
k k=min(1+sqrt(200/d),2) 1.80 ν1 0.53 ρ 0.0064 VRDmax *fcd/2 118
VRDmax
ρ=min((Ast/b/deff),0.02) =αcw*b*z*v1*f
ρ 0.0100 VRDmax cd/2 118 νmin 0.442 Check 7 Ok
νmin νmin=0.031k^(3/2)*fck 0.442 Check 7 Ok σcp 0 θactual 2.20
σcp 0 θactual 4.10 VRDC 17.59 θadopted 45
VRDC=(max(((0.12*k*(80*ρ
*fck)^0.33) + ΔFd (T) =
VRDC 0.15*σcp),(vmin+0.15*σcp) 20.38 θadopted 45 Check OK ΔFd (T) 0.5*Ved*cotθ 4.52
ΔFd (T) =
Check OK ΔFd (T) 0.5*Ved*cotθ 8.395
Shear R/f not required
Dia of shear r/f 10
Spacing 250 SLS Moment of return wall
No of legs 8 At bottom section At 0.6H section
fywd 440 SLS rare moment in SLS Qp Moment in SLS rare moment in SLS Qp Moment in
VRds 31 vertical dir. (Mu) tm vertical direction horizontal dir. (Mu) tm horizontal direction(Mh)
VRd 31
Check OK 15.1 10.6 10.5 6.0
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 143
Creep coefficient φ 1 1
SLS Stress check Bottom section Horizontal Cover 75.00mm Mst = Mrare-MQP 5 5
Load comb Rare QP Rare QP ES 200000 Eceff =Ecm*(Mrare)/Mst+(1+φ)*MQP 18994 20556
MED (T-M) 15 11 11 6 Fcm M 45 mqp = Es/ Ecm 6.2 6.2
b (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 Ecm 32308 mrare =Es/Eceff 10.5 9.73
D (mm) 400 400 400 400
d (mm) 315 315 317 317
φ (mm) 20 20 16 16
s (mm) 100 100 100 100
Ast (mm2) 3142 3142 2011 2011
m 11 6 10 6
N. A.(x) 115 93 94 77
INA 1.83E+09 1.23E+09 1.25E+09 8.69E+08
Comp stress 9.50 8.03 7.88 5.35
Comp Perm. 16.80 12.60 16.80 12.60
Check 1 Ok Ok Ok Ok h k
Tensile stress 174 119 183 103 0 1
Tensile Perm. 300 300 300 300 0.3 1
Check 2 Ok Ok Ok Ok 0.8 0.65
3 0.65
Crack Width Check
Load comb Base 0.6H
b 1000 1000
h 400 400
d 315 317
Acteff =min(h/2,(h-N.A) /3,
Acteff 2.5*(h-d))*b 102354.5 107582.4 From Table 12.2 IRC112
σst 160 160
fcteff 2.9 2.9 cl 12.3.3 IRC-112
k 0.65 0.65 Eq 12.2 IRC-112
kc 0.4 0.4
As, min As,min=k*kc*fcteff/σst 482 507
As provided 3142 2011
Check Ok Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 144
Srequired 200
Check for crack width Check Ok
Load comb
heff=min(2.5(h-d),(h- Check for maximum spacing
heff x/3),h/2) 102.354 107.582 b/w bars
b 1000 1000 Load comb
Aceff Aceff = heff*b 102354 107582 φ 20
Asprovided 3142 2011 C 75
ρpeff ρpeff =As/Aceff 0.031 0.019 Sprovided 100
k1 0.800 0.800
k2 0.500 0.500
σsc 119 103
N.A 93 77
kt 0.5 0.5
αe 6 6
εm =max(((σsc-
εm (kt*(fcteff/ρpeff)*(1+αe*ρ 0.00036 0.00031
Wk 0.130 0.124
Check Ok Ok
A2_Fr-121+255_skew 145
DESIGN OF PILE CAP ABUTMENT
146
INPUT AND
LOAD CALCULATIONS
147
LOUIS BERGER Document no.
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up- Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km.
154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in
the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pile Cap for A1 fix at Ch: 121+255 14-12-2018
area 3.63 m^2
6998 mm
perimeter
Layout of Pile cap
148
154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the
State of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal Siddhartha
ULS CONDITION
SUMMARY OF PILE LOADS

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-xxx for Fix abutment A1, ULS design summary)
LOAD CASE V (T) MT (T-m) ML (T-m)

1604.64 34.50 796.29
Combination-1 (LWL CASE)
1579.70 619.20 777.61
1600.17 34.50 704.90
Combination-1 (HFL CASE)
1542.42 619.20 686.08
Combination-1 (SD LWL CASE) 963.21 0.00 288.07
Combination-1 (SD HFL CASE) 925.93 0.00 194.18
1204.36 29.90 747.01
1178.61 536.64 730.79
1194.96 29.90 665.23
1144.91 536.64 648.92
Combination-2 (SD LWL CASE) 713.49 0.00 316.82
Combination-2 (SD HFL CASE) 679.79 0.00 232.96
1392.91 444.69 1723.85
Seismic Long. (LWL CASE)
1385.77 514.38 1721.47
1392.91 1471.57 783.86
Seismic Trans. (LWL CASE)
1385.77 1528.11 781.47
1236.37 444.69 766.29
Seismic Vert. (LWL CASE)
1230.54 516.23 763.89
1355.63 444.69 1730.97
Seismic Long. (HFL CASE)
1348.49 514.38 1728.58
1355.63 1471.57 790.97
Seismic Trans. (HFL CASE)
1348.49 1528.11 788.59
1199.08 444.69 773.41
Seismic Vert. (HFL CASE)
1193.25 516.23 771.01
Seismic Long. (SD LWL CASE) 943.20 65.21 440.54
Seismic Trans. (SD LWL CASE) 943.20 217.35 318.90
Seismic Vert. (SD LWL CASE) 896.50 65.21 309.73
Seismic Long. (SD HFL CASE) 905.92 65.21 446.77
Seismic Trans. (SD HFL CASE) 905.92 217.35 325.13
Seismic Vert. (SD HFL CASE) 859.22 65.21 315.96
No. of piles = 10
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3 4 5
ZT 44.7 100.1 1.00E+09 100.1 44.7
ZL 16.31 16.31 16.31 16.31 16.31
149
Vishal Siddhartha
SUMMARY OF FORCES FOR DESIGN OF PILE CAP IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION:
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL

210 210 209 209 209 1046
219 212 206 199 192 1028
204 204 203 203 202 1016
210 202 196 190 182 982
Combination-1 (SD LWL CASE) 114 114 114 114 114 570
Combination-1 (SD HFL CASE) 104 104 104 104 104 522
167 167 166 166 166 831
175 168 163 157 151 813
161 161 160 160 160 801
166 160 154 149 142 771
Combination-2 (SD LWL CASE) 91 91 91 91 91 454
Combination-2 (SD HFL CASE) 82 82 82 82 82 411
255 249 245 241 235 1225
Seismic Long. (LWL CASE)
256 249 244 239 233 1221
220 202 187 173 154 937
Seismic Trans. (LWL CASE)
221 202 186 171 152 932
181 175 171 166 161 853
Seismic Vert. (LWL CASE)
181 175 170 165 158 849
252 246 242 237 232 1208
Seismic Long. (HFL CASE)
252 246 241 236 229 1204
217 199 184 169 151 920
Seismic Trans. (HFL CASE)
217 198 183 168 149 916
177 172 167 163 157 837
Seismic Vert. (HFL CASE)
178 172 167 161 155 833
Seismic Long. (SD LWL CASE) 123 122 121 121 120 607
Seismic Trans. (SD LWL CASE) 119 116 114 112 109 569
Seismic Vert. (SD LWL CASE) 110 109 109 108 107 543
Seismic Long. (SD HFL CASE) 119 119 118 117 117 590
Seismic Trans. (SD HFL CASE) 115 113 111 108 106 553
Seismic Vert. (SD HFL CASE) 107 106 105 105 104 526
150
Vishal Siddhartha
MAXIMUM SHEAR = 1224.92 t

LEVER ARM = 1.35 m
MOMENT = 1653.64 tm
Density of soil = 1.8 t/m3
Depth of pile cap = 1.80 m
Depth of cushion = 0.00 m
Downward Weight due to pile cap = 223.89 t
Lever arm = 1.13 m
Moment due to S.W. & Cushion = 251.88 tm
Net moment = 1401.76 tm
Shear check at face of pile
Maximum shear at face of pile = 1224.92 t

Net shear = 1077.30 t
av = 1.4 m
deff = 1.72 m
0.5deff = 0.858 m
2deff = 3.430 m
β = av/2d
= 0.40
Reduced shear = 431.86 t
Transverse direction:-
Since there is no bending in trasnverse direction so there will be minimum reinforcement in trasnverse direction
151
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033

Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200
to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal Siddhartha
SLS CONDITION

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-014 for fix abutment A1, SLS design summary)

1170.19 23.00 491.74
RARE - LWL CASE
1155.99 412.80 479.29
1160.79 23.00 432.35
RARE - HFL CASE
1122.29 412.80 419.80
RARE - SD LWL CASE 713.49 0.00 152.55
RARE - SD HFL CASE 679.79 0.00 91.48
1033.69 0.00 156.77
QPC - LWL CASE
1057.99 0.00 156.86
1024.29 0.00 95.71
QPC - HFL CASE
1024.29 0.00 95.71
QPC - SD LWL CASE 713.49 0.00 152.55
QPC - SD HFL CASE 679.79 0.00 91.48
No. of piles = 10
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3 4 5
ZT 44.7466 100.087 1E+09 100.087 44.7466
ZL 16.31 16.31 16.31 16.31 16.31
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL

148 147 147 147 147 736
RARE - LWL CASE
154 149 145 141 136 725
143 143 143 142 142 713
RARE - HFL CASE
147 142 138 134 129 690
RARE - SD LWL CASE 81 81 81 81 81 404
RARE - SD HFL CASE 74 74 74 74 74 368

LEVER ARM = 1.35 m
MOMENT = 993.39 tm
3
Density of concrete = 2.50 t/m
3
Density of soil = 1.8 t/m
Downward Weight due to pile cap and cushion = 165.85 t
Lever arm = 1.13 m
CRACK WIDTH
V = 1058 t
Max Load on a Pile= 115 t
Lever arm = 1.13 m
Moment due to S.W. & Cushion = 187 tm
Net B.M = 592 t-m
152
ULS CHECK
153
Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033

Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four
Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-
Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal Siddhartha
beff for cantiliver slab = 1.2a+b1

a = 1.4 m
b1 = 1.2 m
beff = 2.8284 m
Hence it overlaps =
beff modified = 2.31 m
Max. Shear = 255.62 t
Load/m
= 110.46 t/m
ULS Moment = 149.89 tm/m
Material Specification:
Concrete grade M35

Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete, fck Mpa 35
Concrete material factor (Уm) 1.50
Design Compressive strength of Concrete, fcd Mpa 15.63
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm Mpa 2.80
Strain at reaching Characteistic Strength, ec2 0.0020
Ultimate Strain, ecu2 0.0035
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ecm ) Gpa 32
Steel Grade Fe550

Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk Mpa 550.00
Partial factor for steel (Уs) 1.15
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd Mpa 478.261
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) Gpa 200
Dry weight of Concrete KN/m³ 25
Permissible Crack Width mm 0.300
Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination fck 0.48
N/mm² 16.80
Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination fyk 0.6
N/mm² 330.00
STRENGTH CHECK
Sl No. Parameters Units Pile cap
1 MOMENT KN-M 1470

2 SHEAR FORCE KN 1084
MATERIAL DATA
3 Grade of Steel 550
4 Characteristic strength of reinf. (fyk) Mpa 550
5 Partial factor for steel (Уs) 1.15
6 Design value for tensile strength (fyd = fyk/Уs) Mpa 478.26
7 Modulus of Elasticity of Steel (Es) Gpa 200
8 Grade of Concrete 35
9 Charecterstic comp. strength (fck) Mpa 35
10 α 0.67
11 Concrete material factor (Уm) 1.50
12 Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd = αfck/Уm) Mpa 15.63
Design of Pier Cap

154
Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033

Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four
Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-
Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
Vishal Siddhartha
Geometric Data
13 Width of slab(b) mm 1000
14 depth of Member mm 1800
15 Clear Cover mm 75
16 Dia of reinforcement mm 20
17 Spacing of bars mm 110
20 Area of reinforcement mm² 2855
21 Reinforcement (Ast/bd) 0.0017
22 Hence Pt= (100*Ast/bd) % 0.17
23 Dia of Shear Reinforcement links mm 0
24 Spacing of reinforcement in other direction mm 220
25 number of legs Nos. 4 (links per meter)
26 Reinforcement(%)
As per Clause 16.5.1.1 of IRC:112-2014, Min. & Max Main Reinforcement.
27 Min. Main Reinforcement mm² 2244

28 Status O.K.
29 Max. Main Reinforcement mm² 45000
30 Status O.K.
Strength of section
31 Eff. depth of section (d = D-c-φ/2) mm 1695
32 Depth of NA from comp. flange (x) mm 109
33 λ 0.80
34 η 1.00
35 Depth of stress Block (λx) mm 87
36 Stress on stress Block (η fcd) MPa 15.63
37 Total comp. force (Fc = λxηfcdb) KN 1365
38 Total tension Force (Fs = fyd At) KN 1365
39 Diff (Fc-Fs) KN 0
40 Depth of Lever arm (z) = d-λx/2 mm 1651
41 Moment of resistance (Fc*z) KN-m 2254
42 UR for pure bending 0.65
43 Status O.K.
Shear Resistance
56 Shear reduction factor, β = αv/2d
57 0.5d = mm 848
58 2d = mm 3390
59 αv = m 1.357
60 β= 0.401
61 Design Shear force,Ved = kN 434
62 K = 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.344
63 σcp MPa 0.000
64 ρ1=At/(bd)<=0.02 0.002
65 Vmin = 0.031*k^(3/2).fck^(1/2) KN 0.286
66 Concrete Shear Capacity Vrd.c =
KN 456
67 [0.12.K(80p1fck)^0.33+(0.15σcp)]bwd
68 Min. Concrete Shear Capacity Vrd.cmin =
KN 484
69 [Vmin+(0.15σcp)]bwd
70 Status (if 0 = reinf. Not reqd;or 1 = reinf reqd) 0
*Surface Reinforcement (Cl. 16.5.4 (4)-IRC:112-2011)

Minimum Surface Reinforcement (1% of Act,ext) mm2 375
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) in long. Direction mm 12
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or in longitiudinal dir. mm 140
Reinforcement Provided in long. Direction mm2/m 808
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) in trans. Direction mm 12
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or in Trans dir. mm 220
Reinforcement Provided in Trans. Direction mm2/m 514
Status O.K
Secondary Reinforcement
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) mm 12
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or mm 140
Reinforcement Provided mm2 807.43
Status O.K
Design of Pier Cap

155
PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK
156
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of 4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No 4800197
033
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
Vishal Siddhartha 14-12-2018
Design of Pile Cap for A1 fix at Ch: 121+255
DESIGN FOR PUNCHING SHEAR IN PILE CAP AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
3
Density of concrete 25 KN/m
3
Density of soil 18 KN/m
Characteristic Strength, fck 35 Mpa
Design Strength of concrete, fcd 15.63 Mpa
Net Applied Force, Ved 2508 KN
Net downward force within the control perimeter, DVEd 263.9 KN
Overall depth of pile cap 1800 mm
Effective Depth of Pile Cap, d 1699.0 mm
Reinforcement Ratio, rl 0.0007
Distance between the edge of pile to the edge of pier 648 < 2d
VEd,red = VEd - DVEd 2243.72 KN
n = 0.6 x [1-fck/310] 0.532
Maximum Punching Shear Resistance , nRd.max = 0.5 x n x fcd 4.16 Mpa
0.5
K = 1 + (200/d) 1.34 ≤2
1.5 0.5
nmin = 0.031 x K x (fck) 0.285 Mpa
Distance of control perimeter from column periphery, a 648.0 mm
2xd/a 5.24
Perimeter along control line, p 7000.00 mm
2
Area enclosed by control line 3.62 m
nEd,red = VEd,red /(bd) 0.189 MPa
nmin x 2d/a 1.497 MPa
0.333
nRd = 0.12 x K x (80.r1.fck) x (2d/a) 1.497 MPa
HENCE, OK
157
SLS CHECK
158
4800197-GGN-DD-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation Job No 4800197 033
to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-
A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC
mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal Siddhartha
DESIGN OF foundation (SLS)
S.no. Refrence Unit Long Dir
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 7915
Material Data
2 Grade of Steel Fe 550
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) 500
4 Partial factor for steel (γs) Cl 6.2.2,IRC 112 1.15
5 Design value for tensile strength (fyd=fyk/γs) Cl 6.2.2,IRC 112 MPa 434.78
6 Modulus of Elasticity of Steel (ES) Cl 6.2.2,IRC 112 GPa 200
7 Grade of Concrete M35
8 Charecterstic compressive strength (fck) Table 6.5,IRC 112 MPa 35
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67
10 Concrete material factor (γm) Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 1.50
Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd=
11 αfck/γm) Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63
12 Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Ecm) Table 6.5,IRC 112 GPa 32
Geometric Data
13 Width of Slab/Beam (b) mm 16200
14 Total depth of Slab/Beam (D) mm 1800
15 Cover to Reinforcement mm 75
16 Dia of Reinforcement (φ) in first layer mm 20
18 Effective depth of beam/Slab (d) mm 1715
19 Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or mm 110
20 Number of Bar (n) Nos 147
21 Area of Reinforcement (At) mm2 46181
22 Reinforcement (%) 0.158
Stress Check
23 Concrete Cross Sectional Area (AC) mm2 29160000
24 Perimeter in contact with atmosphere (u) mm 36000
25 Notional Size (=2AC/u) mm 1620
26 Final Creep Co-efficient (φ) Table 6.9 ,IRC 112 1.50
27 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112MPa 12800
28 Modular ratio (m) 1.56
29 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 300
30 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 16.80
31 Position of nuetral axis from comp. face (x) mm 119.2
32 MOA of Compression area mm2 1.15E+08
2
33 MOA of Tension area mm 1.15E+08
2
34 Diff. mm 0
4
35 MOI of cracked section mm 1.93E+11
36 Stress in tension reinf. MPa 102.304
UR 0.34
37 Status O.K.
38 Stress in concrete MPa 4.892
UR 0.29
39 Status O.K.
159
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up- Job No 4800197 DD-033
154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State
of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal Siddhartha
CRACK WIDTH CHECK
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 5812
Material Data
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) Table 18.1,IRC 112 MPa 500
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67
11 Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd= αfck/γm)
Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63
Geometric Data
Stress Check
25 Age at Loading days 28
26 Relative humidity Table 6.9 , IRC %
112 12800
28 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112
MPa 12487.8
30 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 400.0
31 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 12.60
34 MOA of Tension area mm2 1.01E+09
35 Diff. mm2 0.000
36 MOI of cracked section mm4 1.61E+12
160
4800197-GGN-
Vishal Siddhartha
37 Stress in tension reinf. ssc MPa 78.787

38 Status O.K.
40 Status O.K.
CALCULATION FOR CRACK WIDTH FOR BENDING As per 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011
41 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)
42 ae = Es/Ecm 6.25
43 depth hc,eff mm 212.5
44 Eff area of conc in tension surrounding reinf Ac,eff mm2 3442500
45 Rr,eff 0.0134
46 fctm Mpa 2.800
47 fct,eff Mpa 2.800
48 kt 1.500
49 (esm-ecm)= {ssc - kt(fct,eff/Rr,eff)(1+aeRr,eff)}/Es -0.0013
50 0.6*ssc/Ec 0.0002
51 (esm-ecm) 0.0002
52 K1 0.80
53 K2 0.50
54 Minimum clear cover c 75.00
55 Srmax = 3.4c+0.425k1k2f/Rreff 508
56 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm) 0.120
Allowable crack width 0.300
UR 0.40
Status O.K.
161
West Bengal
Pier for Bridge at chainage 121+255
Pier_ModSkew_121+255 162
Content
1 Input, Load Calculations, Design forces
2 Pier Section Design
3 Pile Base Pressure Check
4 Pile SLS check
5 Pile ULS Check
6 Pile Structural Desgin
Annex _I Confinement RF
Pier_ModSkew_121+255 163
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Designed by: Checked by
Design of Pier P1 for MJB at Ch: 121+255 14-12-2018
Vishal Siddhartha
1 Inputs:
16.00 Traffic
Direction
FRL 0.00%
+63.410
24.3m span 24.3 m span
2.20 3m
Top of pier 0.85

+60.760
cap
5.80
4.267
GL 56.14
55.64
2.30
1.80
53.84
= 25.00 deg
Skew Angle
Finished Road Level (FRL) at the centre of Pier = 63.41 m
Pile cap bottom level / Founding level = 53.84 m

Max depth of scour For Pier from FSL (Ref: ANNEXURE-I)
= 5.16 m
Super Structure
Overall Length Span 1 = 24.30 m
Overall Length Span 2 = 24.30 m

Width of Deck Slab - Span 1 = 16.00 m
Width of Deck Slab - Span 2 = 16.00 m
Super structure Depth = 2.20 m
Crash barrier Height = 1.10 m
Wearing Coat thickness = 0.1 m
Effective Length of span 1 = 21.50 m
Effective Length of span 2 = 21.50 m

Sub Structure
Depth of Bearing + Pedestal = 0.35 m
Pier Cap Top Level = +60.760 m =+63.410-0.1-2.20-0.35 - cross slope
Pier cap - Length along the Traffic = sq dim 3.7 m
Pier cap - Length across the Traffic = sq dim 13.2 m
Pier cap - Overall Depth = 0.85 m
Centre to centre of bearing (Transverse) = 3.00 m
Centre to centre of bearing (Longitudinal) = 2.80 m
Height of sloping portion of piercap = 0.95 m
Existing GL = 56.14 m
Height of Pier from top of Pile Cap = 5.12 m =+60.760-55.643
Height of Pier below GL = 0.50 m
Pier_ModSkew_121+255
164
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Design height of pier = 5.20 m
Dimension of Pier along traffic = sq dim 1.80 m
Dimension of Pier across traffic = Square Dim = Skw 6.4* cos q 5.80 m LWL (RL) = +56.14
Scour level HFL = +54.19 m Scour level HFL-S = 54.71
HFL (RL) = +59.35 m Scour level LWL-S = 55.22
Max depth of scour = 5.16 m from HFL
Foundation
Pile - Diameter = 1.2 m
No of Pile = 6.0 Nos
Pile cap/Footing -Along Traffic Direction = 5.1 m
Pile cap /Footing -Across Traffic Direction = 8.7 m
Pile cap - Depth = 1.8 m
Min Thickness of soil above pile cap = 0.5 m
Materials
Unit weight of PSC = 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of RCC = 25 kN/m3
Unit weight of Wearing course = 22 kN/m3
Unit weight of Soil fill = 18 kN/m3
Grade of Concrete for Pier = 35 N/mm²
Grade of Concrete for Piles (or Open Foundation) = 35 N/mm²
Grade of Steel used = 500 N/mm²
Load Calculation
1.1 Dead Load
1.1.1 SuperStructure
Load from Span 1
Total Weight = (360.2)×25.0 DL Extra Factor 1
Reaction on Bearing(Outer bearing) = 2795 kN
Load from Span 2

Total Weight = =(360.2)×25.0
Reaction on Bearing(Inner bearing) = 2795 kN
Total reaction on pier from two spans 5590 kN

=
ML due to different spans 0 kN-m
=
Transverse moment = 0 kN-m
Total SIDL
Reaction (Outer Bearing) = 644 kN
Reaction (Inner Bearing) = 644 kN
Total reaction = 1288 kN
Fixed SIDL ( crash barrier+services)

Reaction ( outer bearing ) = 243.0 kN
Reaction (Inner bearing) = 243.0 kN
Total reaction = 486 kN
Long. Moment due to diff. Spans = 0.0 kN-m
Transverse Moment = 0.0 kN-m
Variable SIDL(Wearing coat+future overlay)

Reaction (Outer bearing) = 401.0 kN
Reaction (Inner Bearing ) = 401.0 kN
Total reaction due to SIDL(Wearing coat) = 802 kN
Long. Moment due to diff. Spans = 0.0 kN-m
Transverse Moment = 0.0 kN-m
165
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.2 Live Load
1.2.1 Governing Load cases for Live Load
Case 1 (Maximum Axial Force case) Without any reduction factor

Axial force = 2118 kN
Longitudinal Moment = 178 kNm
Transverse Moment = 2185 kNm
Case 2 (Maximum Longitudinal Moment case)-

Transverse Moment = 285 kNm
Case 3 (Maximum Transverse Moment case)

Transverse Moment = 5635 kNm MT Input should be increased for skew effect
1.3 Longitudinal Forces (Braking Force & Friction Force)
1.3.1 70R
Braking Force
No.of vehicles on span = 1 nos.

Total Live load of 1L 70R = 1000 kN 1L Class A 554 kN
For Contribution of B.F = 20% of First Train + 10% of Second train
Contribution of B.F (Fh) (In Normal case) = 255 kN Contribution of B.F (Fh) (In Trans Seis case)
Contribution of B.F (Fh) (Max Possible in Long Seis case) = 0 kN 41 kN
Friction Force
Left side Right side
P1 P2 P3 P4
S.No Description \ Type of Pier
Fx Free
1 DL Rxn on free end (input value) 2795 2795 0
2 SIDL on free end (input value) 644 644 0
Coefficient of Friction 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Frictional force due to DL + SIDL 172 172 0 0
3 LL Reaction Without any reduction factor 2118 2118 0 0

Frictional force due to LL 106 106 0 0
Live Load Lane reduction factor to be
taken = 0.8 LL factor on Seismic = 0.2
Normal Case Trans Seismic Case
Fixed Bearing max of:
Fh-u(Rg+Rq) -1 kN -148 kN
Fh/2+u(Rg+Rq) 384 kN 209.326 kN
Free bearing
u(Rg+Rq) 257 kN 189
Total Horizontal force normal 641 kN
Design Longitudinal Force

= 641 kN 398 kN
(B.F & F.F) - Service
Design Longitudinal Force - seismic = 0 kN DesignTransverse Force - seismic
Design Longitudinal Force - seismic
166
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.4 Seismic force
Calculation of Seismic coefficients
 Z   Sa 
   
 2   g 
Ah 
 R 
 
 I 
Importance factor , I = 1.20
Zone Factor, Z (for Zone v) = 0.36
Response reduction factor, R Long- direction = 3.00
Response reduction factor, R Trans - direction = 3.00
Fundamental natural period
D
T 2 (Annexure D , IRC:6-2017)
1000 F
D= Appropriate dead load of the superstructure and live load in kN
F = Horizontal force in kN required to be applied at the centre of mass of the superstructure for one mm
horizontal deflection at the top of the pier for the earthquake in the transverse direction
and the force to be applied at the top of the bearings for the earthquake in the longitudinal direction
1.4.1 Calculation of Stiffness
Pier
Dimension of Pier - Longitudinal direction = 1.80 m
Dimension of Pier - Transverse direction = 6.40 m
Pier - design height = 5.20 m
Height of the C.G of Superstructure from soffit (DL+SIDL) (h) = 1.61 m
Grade of concrete = M 35
4
M.I in longitudinal direction IL (0.75 Cracked MOI) = 2.333 m =(6.40×1.80^3)/12
M.I in transverse direction IT (0.75 Cracked MOI) 4
= 29.491 m =(1.80×6.40^3)/12
Modulus of elasticity of concrete E = 32000 N/mm2 (IRC:112-2011 Table 6.5)
Stiffness in trans direction K1T = 3EI/H
3
=6×32000×1000×29.491/((5.55^2)×((3×(1.61))+(2
= 7713023 kN/m
×5.55)))
3
Stiffness - Longitudinal (3EIL/L ) K1L = 1309995 kN/m =3×32000×1000×2.333/(5.55)^3
Height taken for the calculation (H) upto bearing top = 5.55 m
(H of shortest pier in the group)
Piles
Pile - Diameter = 1.20 m
Pile - Length ( L1+Lf) = 7.4 m

Number of pile per pier location "n" = 6 Nos.
4
Moment of inertia of one pile (I) = 0.1018 m =(3.142×(1.20)^4)/64
Grade of concrete = M 35
Young's modulus of elasticity of concrete E
(IRC:112-2011 Table 6.5)
= 32000 N/mm2
96469 kN/m
3
Stiffness of one pile k= 12EI / L = =(12×32000×1000×0.1018/(7.40)^3)
Stiffness of pile group = nk = 578813 kN/m =6×96469
Stiffness in trans direction K2T = 578813 kN/m
Stiffness in Long direction K2L = 578813 kN/m
Total Stiffness
Stiffness " k " = 1/(1/k1+1/k2)
Stiffness in Longitudinal direction "KL" = =1/(1/1309995+1/578813)
= 401440 kN/m
= 401.44 kN/mm 1309.995459
Stiffness in transverse direction "KT" = 1/(1/7713023+1/578813)
= 538409 kN/m
= 538.41 kN/mm 7713.022718
167
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.4.2 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Longitudinal direction
S.No Description DL SIDL

1 Left bearing 2795 644
2 Right Bearing 2795 644
3 Free Pier 0 0
4 Right EJ Pier 0 0
Sub total 5590 1288
Total Load 6878 kN (=5590+1288)
D = 6878 kN
T = 0.145 (eq-1)
Sa/g = 2.500 2.50 for square pier link with this
= 2.500 for wall type pier full Sa/g considered
Horizontal accelaration longitudinal " AhL " = (Sa/g)*(Z/2)/(R/I)
= 0.180 =(0.36/2)×(2.500)/(3.00/1.20)
Vertical acceleration " Av " = 0.120 as per clause 219.3 of IRC:6-2017
1.4.3 Calculation of Seismic coefficient in the Transverse direction
S.No Description Load (kN) Remark
1 Dead Load 5590 1.1

2 SIDL 1288 1.1.2
3 Live Load 424 Refer 1.2.1
5 Pier(50%) 0
Total Seismic load (D) 7302
T = 0.062 (eq-1)
Sa/g = 2.500
Horizontal acceleration Transverse " AhT " = (Sa/g)*(Z/2)/(R/I)
= 0.180 (=(0.36/2)×2.500/(3.00/1.20))
Vertical acceleration " Av " = 0.120 as per clause 219.3 of IRC:6-2017
1.5 Centrifugal force

2
C = (WV )/(127R)
Max Reaction case load = 2118 kN
Max Longitudinal case load = 1702 kN
Max transverse case load = 1378 kN
Design Speed " V " = 100.00 km/hr
Radius of curve " R " = 1500 m
Centrifugal force
C.F -max reaction = 111 kN =2118×100×100/(127x1500)
C.F-max longitudinal case = 89 kN =1702×100×100/(127x1500)
C.F-max transverse case = 72 kN =1378×100×100/(127x1500)
1.6 Wind Load

Ht. of Parapet (From C/S) = 1.10 m
Ht. of parapet from GL = 8.35
For height of 8.35m as per IRC:6-2017, Table:4 wind pressure is as below,
Table:4 wind pressure is for basic wind speed 33m/s

Assume Terrain without Obstructions
Wind speed in Delhi location = 36 m/s

(As per IS:875-Part3)
H (m) Pressure
At vehicle top 10.25 555
At parapet top 8.35 533
At girder bot. 5.05 552
2
Avg. Wind pressure (Pz) = 542 N/m
168
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
I) For Superstructure (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Gust Factor (G) for spans upto 150m = 2.0

Drag Coefficient (CD) = 2(1+c/20d) 2.210344828 = 1.3
Where, c= c/c distance of adjacent girders & d=depth of windward girder
2
Exposed area of superstructure (A1) 24.3 80.19 = 80 m
Transverse wind load (FT) = Pz x A1 x G x CD
= 113 kN
Longitudinal wind load (FL) = 28 kN
Width of Superstructure = 17.7 m

2
Plan Area (A3) 428.993335 = 429 m
Lift Coefficient (CL) = 0.75
Vertical wind load (FV) = Pz x A3 x G x CL
(-ve sign indicates upward direction of wind force) = -349 kN

CG of wind load on Superstructure above bearing = 1.65 m
II) For Live load (as per Cl.209.3.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Gust Factor (G) = 2.0

Drag Coefficient (CD) = 1.95
Height of Vehicle = 3.0 m
Exposed ht. of vehicle = 1.90 m
For a height of 10.25m

2
Avg. Wind pressure (Pz) = 544 N/m
a) Max. Reaction case
Length of car on span 1 24.30 = 12.2 m
Length of car on span 2 24.30 = 12.2 m

2
Exposed area of Vehicle = 46.2 m
Transverse wind load (FT) = 98 kN
Longitudinal wind load (FL) = 24.5 kN

b) Max. long. moment case
Length of car on span 1 = 24 m

2
Exposed area of Vehicle = 0.0 m
c) Max. trans. moment case

2
Exposed area of Vehicle 27.702 = 46.2 m
CG of wind load due to Live load above bearing = 4.15 m
169
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
III) For Substructure (as per Cl.209.4 of IRC:6-2017)
Height of pier (Piercap top to GL) h = 4.700 m
Dim. Parallel to wind d = 1.8 m
Dim. Perpendicular to wind b = 6.40 m
h/b = 0.73
d/b = 0.281
Drag Coefficient (CD) = 1.30
2
Exposed area of substructure (A1) = 10 m
2
Wind pressure (Pz) = 551.8 N/m
Transverse wind load (FT) Pz x A1 x G x CD = 14 kN
Height of pier (Piercap top to GL) h = 4.7 m
Dim. Parallel to wind d = 6.40 m
Dim. Perpendicular to wind b = 1.8 m
h/b = 2.61
d/b = 3.556
Drag Coefficient (CD) 1.361111111 = 0.80
2
Exposed area of substructure (A1) = 77.0 m
2
Wind pressure (Pz) = 551.8 N/m
Longitudinal wind load (FL) = 68 kN
1.9 Horizontal Force due to Water Current:

Average velocity of flow (Ref:Annexure-v) V = 3 m/sec
Lowest Bed level (As per hydrologycal data) = 56.143 m

say = 56.143 m
High Flood level = 59.35 m
Height of the pier exposed to water pressure - HFL condition = 3.71

Height of the pier exposed to water pressure - LWL condition = 0.50
Component of maximum velocity in lateral direction =(2)^0.5×3 = 4.24 m/sec
Width of the pier perpendicular to the direction of water flow = 1.80 m
Width of the Pile cap perpendicular to the direction of water flow = 5.10 m
Width of the pier parellal to the direction of water flow = 6.40 m
Width of the Pile cap parellal to the direction of water flow = 8.70 m
2
Intensity of pressure due to water P = 52KV
Constant K depends on the shape - For pier & footings K = 0.66
Intensity of pressure =52×0.66×4.24^2 = 617.8 kg/m2
=617.76×9.81/1000 = 6.1 kN/m2
Variation of force due to water current over pier
Variation of velocity with depth (at HFL -S) (at HFL -N)
2
(at HFL) 6.06 6.06 kN/m
HFL
5.2 3.71
1.22 1.71 kN/m2 Pier bottom
0.00 4.64 0.00 kN/m2 Pile bottom
SCOUR LEVEL
170
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Lateral
Resolved Pressure intensities at Cos q Calculation Trans force Sin q Calculation Long. force
intensity
HFL 6.1 0.940 =6.1×0.940 5.69 0.342 =6.1×0.342 2.07

Bottom of pier level 1.7 0.940 =1.7×0.940 1.60 0.342 =1.7×0.342 0.58
Bottom of footing level 0.0 0.940 =0.0×0.940 0.00 0.342 =0.0×0.342 0.00
Transverse Forces & Moments:

Force Transverse Moment at
Direction Component transverse
HT Lever arm Pier bottom Lever arm Pile Bottom
on pier 24.35 2.200 53.565 - -

Transverse
on pile cap 7.36 - - 1.200 106.23 3.350
1.2
Longitudinal Forces & Moments:

Longitudinal Moment at
Force long
Direction Component
HL Lever arm Pier bottom Lever arm Pile Bottom
on pier 31.51 2.1998 69.319 - -

Longitudinal
on pile cap 4.57 - - 1.20 131.52 3.645
1.2
HFL - SEISMIC CASE

degree to20
be considered
Lateral
Resolved Pressure intensities at Cos q Calculation Trans force Sin q Calculation Long. force
intensity
HFL 6.1 0.940 =6.1×0.940 5.69 0.342 =6.1×0.342 2.07
Bottom of pier level 1.2 0.940 =1.2×0.940 1.15 0.342 =1.2×0.342 0.42
Bottom of footing level 0.0 0.940 =0.0×0.940 0.00 0.342 =0.0×0.342 0.00
Transverse Forces & Moments:

Force Transverse Moment at
Direction Component transverse
HT Lever arm Pier bottom Lever arm Pile Bottom
on pier 22.83 2.264 51.691 - -
Transverse
on pier cap 5.27 - - 1.200 99.12 3.527
1.2
Longitudinal Forces & Moments:
Force long Longitudinal Moment at

Direction Component
HL Lever arm Pier bottom Lever arm Pile Bottom
on pier 29.55 2.264 66.894 - -
Longitudinal
on pier cap 3.27 - - 1.20 124.01 3.778
1.2
171
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.10 Buoyancy : HFL
Upto pier level Volume of water displaced 47.1 m^3

Weight to be deducted 471.2 kN
Upto pile cap Volume of water displaced 79.9 m^3

bottom / fdn
Buoyancy : LWL
Volume of water displaced 5.8 m^3

Upto pier level
Upto pile cap Volume of water displaced 79.9 m^3

bottom
Force Resolve along Skew

HL / ML
q
Mx Long
Hx
MT Skew Angle 25.00

HT Cos q  0.906
HZ/Mz Trans. Sin q  0.423
HX = HL cos q + HT sin q
Hz = -HL sin q + HTcos q
1.51 Summary of Loads at the Top of Pier cap
P Horizontal Force (kN) Resolved H Force (kN) Lever arm (m) Resolved Moment (kN-m)
S.No Description of Load
(kN) HT HL Hz(HT') Hx (HL') eT eL Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)
1 D.L (Superstructure ) 5590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.S.S 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 802 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1-Max P) 2118 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 2185 178
L.L (Case 2-Max ML) 1702 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 285 1577
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) 1378 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 5635 37
4 Longitudinal Forces (additional vertical force is neglected)
4.1 Normal Condition 0 0 641 271 581 0.35 0.35 95 203
4.2 During Seismic Condition 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.35 0 0
5.1 Seismic Force (Transverse) 0 0
5.1.1 Superstructure (DL) -671 1006 0 912 425 1.82 0.35 1657 149
5.1.2 Superstructure (SIDL) -155 232 0 210 98 2.60 0.35 546 34
5.1.3 Superstructure (LL) 0 0
L.L (-Max P) -51 76 0 69 32 3.850 0.35 266 11
L.L ( Max ML) -41 61 0 56 26 3.850 0.35 214 9
L.L (- Max MT) -33 50 0 45 21 3.850 0.35 173 7
5.1.4 Substructure 0 0
5.2 Seismic Force (Longitudinal) 0 0
5.2.3 Substructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Centrifugal Force 0 0
Max P 0 111 0 101 47 3.85 0.4 388 16
Max ML 0 89 0 81 38 3.85 0.4 312 13
Max MT 0 72 0 66 31 3.85 0.4 252 11
7 Wind Load 0 0
On superstructure -349 113 28 91 73 1.45 0.35 131 26
172
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Live load max reaction case 0 98 24 78 64 4.15 0.35 325 22
Live load max longitudinal case 0 0 0 0 0 4.15 0.35 0 0
Live load max Transverse case 0 98 24 78 64 4.15 0.35 325 22
8 Buoyancy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Water Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
173
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.52 Load Combination at the Top of Pier cap for ULS condition
P Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m)

S.No Load Combination Remark
(kN)
Hz(HT') Hx (HL') Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)
1 Group I (Case-1) 11834 679 1051 3641 581
2 Group I (Case-2) 11334 585 983 976 2236
3 Group I (Case-3) 11152 647 1036 8501 413
4 Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 11031 658 917 3161 485
7 Group III (Case-1) Seismic Transverse 8631 1857 920 4134 363
Refer Annexure
10 Group IV (Case-1) Seismic Longitudinal 8707 795 1688 665 619
1.53 Load Combination at the Top of Pier cap for SLS condition
P Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m)

(kN)
1 Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 8523 453 701 2427 388
4 Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 7960 433 601 2071 317
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 8135 348 532 1843 293
8 Group III (Case-2 Service-Frequent) 7885 297 495 495 1119 Refer Annexure
9 Group III (Case-3 Service-Frequent) 7794 332 525 4273 209
10 Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 7168 172 206 705 101
13 Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 7038 0 0 0 0
1.54 Dead Load - Substructure
Skew Angle q = 25 deg

Skew factor (cos q) = 0.906
*** Transverse Dimension put always along skew ; Traffic dimensions are normal ; Pile cap dimension & pile co-ordinates are normal, no effect of skew. So input of Pile cap dimension shall be orthogonal
14.56 3.70
3.31
W1
0.850
0.950
W2 Traffic Direction
2.90
W3
6.40 1.80
0.50
1.8 m
174
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Load of Pier
W2 Area of flared portion (top) = 53.89 m2 Pedestal :
Area of flared portion (bot.) = 23.68 m2 Width = 1.100 m
Height of flared portion = 0.95 m Length = 1.100 m
3
Volume of flared portion = 35.9 m P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
CG of the flared portion from top of straight
= 0.54 m 896.89 3.94
portion of pier
W3 Width = 6.40 m
Breadth = 1.80 m
Area of c/s of straight portion = 11.520 m2
Total Height of straight portion = 3.40 m =5.20-0.95-0.85
3
Volume of straight portion = 39.168 m P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
979.2 1.7
W1 Pier Cap
Length of pier cap = 14.56 m
Width of pier cap = 3.7 m
Avg.Thickness of pier cap = 0.85 m P (KN) e (m) from Pier Base
3
Volume of pier cap = 45.80563093 m 1145.140773 4.775
Self wt of pier + pier cap = 3021 kN

Combined 3021 3.530
1.55 Summary of Load at the Pile Cap Top
Height of the pier = 5.200 m
(kN)
HT HL Hz(HT') Hx (HL') eT eL Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)
1 D.L (Super + Substructure ) 8611 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.S.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 486 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 802 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1- Max P) 2118 0 0 0 0 2185 178
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) 1702 0 0 0 0 285 1577
L.L (Case 3 - MT) 1378 0 0 0 0 5635 37
4 Longitudinal Forces (additional vertical force is neglected)
4.1 Normal Condition 0 270.91521 581 5.55 5.55 1504 3224
4.2 During Seismic Condition 0 0 0 0 5.55 0 0
5.1 Seismic Force (Transverse)
5.1.3 Superstructure (LL)
L.L (Case 1-Max P) -51 76 0 69 32 9.05 5.55 625 179
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) -41 61 0 56 26 9.05 5.55 503 144
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) -33 50 0 45 21 9.05 5.55 407 116
5.1.4 Substructure -363 544 0 544 0 3.53 3.53 1919 0
5.2 Seismic Force (Longitudinal)
5.2.3 Substructure -363 0 544 0 544 3.53 3.53 0 1919
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 111 0 101 47 9.05 5.55 912 261
Max ML 0 89 0 81 38 9.05 5.55 733 210
Max MT 0 72 0 66 31 9.05 5.55 593 170
7 Wind Load
Live load max transverse case 0 98 24 78 64 8.70 5.55 682 353
On substructure 0 14 68 16 68 2.60 2.60 41 176
8 Vehicle Collision Load
Longitudinal - Main Component 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0
Transverse - Main Component 0 0 0 0 0 3.50 0 0 0
Longitudinal - Residual Component 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0
Transverse - Residual Component 0 0 0 0 0 3.50 0 0 0
8 Construction Load
8.1 L.G. Case 1 (Max 'P') 0 0 0.00 0 0 5.20 5.20 0 0
8.2 L.G. Case 2 (Max 'ML') 0 0 0 0 0 5.20 5.20 0 0
8.3 L.G. Case 3 (Max 'MT') 0 0 0 0 0 5.20 5.20 0 0
8.4 Dead Load of Superstructure 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
8.5 Dead Load of Substructure 3021 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
8.6 Seismic Load Superstructure 0 0 0 0 0 6.51 6.51 0 0
8.7 Seismic Load Substructure 0 0 0 0 0 3.53 3.53 0 0
175
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
8 Water current
LWL Normal/Seismic
HFL Normal 24 31.5 9 39 2.20 2.20 19 85
HFL-seismic 23 29.5 8 36 2.26 2.26 19 82
9 Buyoyancy
LWL Normal/Seismic -58
HFL Normal -471
HFL-seismic -471
10 Hydrodynamic
LWL Seismic 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
HFL Seismic 12.16 12.16 6 16 1.59 1.59 9 26
1.56 Seismic Force Combination Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m)
S.No Combination P Hz(HT') Hx (HL') Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)
1 Seismic - Transverse
1.1 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max. P -372 1892 1055 11454 5527
1.2 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max. P 372 1892 1055 11454 5527
1.3 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max ML -369 1878 1049 11331 5492
1.4 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max ML 369 1878 1049 11331 5492
1.5 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max MT -366 1868 1044 11235 5464
1.6 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max MT 366 1868 1044 11235 5464
2 Seismic - Longitudinal
2.1 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max. P -356 1044 1832 6079 9072
2.2 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max. P 356 1044 1832 6079 9072
2.3 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max ML -356 1040 1831 6042 9061
2.4 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max ML 356 1040 1831 6042 9061
2.5 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max MT -356 1036 1829 6013 9053
2.6 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max MT 356 1036 1829 6013 9053
3 Seismic - Vertical
3.1 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max. P -1239 677 666 4046 3369
3.2 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max. P 1239 677 666 4046 3369
3.3 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max ML -1229 673 664 4009 3358
3.4 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max ML 1229 673 664 4009 3358
3.5 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max MT -1221 670 663 3980 3350
3.6 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max MT 1221 670 663 3980 3350
1.57 Load Combination at the Top of Pile cap - SLS
LWL - Case
Moment Resultant
P Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m) kNm
(kN)
1 Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 11536 462 741 4776 4137 6319
4 Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 10973 448 669 4310 3618 5627
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 11147 356 566 3648 3150 4820
8 Group III (Case-2 Service-Frequent) 10898 310 540 2105 3844 4382 Refer Annexure
10 Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 10181 181 247 1591 1277 2040
13 Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 10051 0 0 0 0 0
176
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
HFL - Case
Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m) Moment Resultant

P
S.No Load Combination kNm Remark
(kN) Hz(HT') Hx (HL') Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)

1.58 Load Combination at the Top of Pile cap - ULS

LWL- Case
P Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m) Moment Resultant
1 Group I (Case-1) 15904 693 1112 7164 6206 9478
2 Group I (Case-2) 15404 608 1064 4136 7616 8667
3 Group I (Case-3) 15222 651 1092 11767 5933 13178
4 Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 15101 681 1018 6565 5516 8575
7 Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-V) 13409 2909 1670 17977 9005 20106
Refer Annexure
8 Group III (Case-1B) Seismic Transverse(+V) 14523 2909 1670 17977 9005 20106
9 Group III (Case-2A) Seismic Transverse (-V) 13347 2885 1659 17460 9168 19721
Group III (Case-2B) Seismic Transverse

10 13347 2885 1659 17460 9168 19721
(+V)
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic Longitudinal(-

13 13431 1582 2757 9613 13678 16718
V)
Group IV (Case-1B) Seismic
14 14519 2834 1582 17492 8308 19364
Longitudinal(+V)
15 13365 1573 2753 9225 13878 16664
V)
16 14434 1573 2753 9225 13878 16664
Longitudinal(+V)
17 13341 1567 2750 10141 13617 16978
V)
18 14410 1567 2750 10141 13617 16978
Longitudinal(+V)
18 Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 12108 1087 1087 6865 5768 8967
18 Group V (Case-1B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 15824 1087 1087 6865 5768 8967
177
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
HFL- Case
P kNm
1 Group I (Case-1) 15842 702 1151 7183 6291 9549
2 Group I (Case-2) 15342 617 1103 4155 7702 8751
3 Group I (Case-3) 15160 660 1131 11786 6018 13234
7 Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-V) 12995 2922 1711 18005 9095 20171 Refer annex

10 14039 2899 1700 17488 9258 19787
(+V)

13 13018 1592 2809 9635 13786 16819
V)
14 14105 2844 1633 17513 8416 19430
Longitudinal(+V)
15 12951 1582 2805 9247 13986 16766
V)
16 14020 1582 2805 9247 13986 16766
Longitudinal(+V)
17 12927 1576 2802 10162 13725 17077
V)
18 13996 1576 2802 10162 13725 17077
Longitudinal(+V)
25 Group VI (Accidental) Case 1 10153 264 464 1937 2596 3239
10.44066571 44
1.60 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom Footing 80
Depth of pile cap /Open foundation = 1.80 W1 1997 e1 0.900
Height from Piercap Top = 7.00 m W2 0 e2 1.800
Dead load of the Pier at this level = 3021 kN Soil W3 296 e3 2.05
Dead load of the pile cap = 1997 kN W= 2292 e= 1.048
0.000
2.30
0.5 e3
Wt of soil 296 KN e2
Wt of water from GL to HFL acting on Footing 1053 KN e1
buyoyancy on soil 164 KN
178
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Pier +Piercap 3021 e11 = 5.330
Total weight to be used for seismic in foundation 1597 KN Sub+Fdn 5314 3.8489
(Only for exposed pile cap, Zero in case of embedded Open foundation or pile cap)
(kN)
HT HL Hz(HT') Hx (HL') eT eL Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)
1 D.L (Super + Substructure ) 10904 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
D.S.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 S.I.D.L- Fixed 486 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S.I.D.L- variable 802 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Live Load
L.L (Case 1-Max P) 2118 0 0 0 0 0 0 2185 178
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) 1702 0 0 0 0 0 0 285 1577
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) 1378 0 0 0 0 0 0 5635 37
4 Longitudinal Forces (additional vertical force is neglected) *** HL in trans seismic is not shown here. Cell H679 linked separately in Annex tables
4.1 Normal Condition 0 0 0 271 581 7 7.35 1991 4270
4.3 During Seismic Condition 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.35 0 0
5.1 Seismic Force (Transverse)
5.1.3 Superstructure (LL)
L.L (Case 1-Max P) -51 76 0 69 32 10.85 7.35 750 237
L.L (Case 2 - Max ML) -41 61 0 56 26 10.85 7.35 603 190
L.L (Case 3 - Max MT) -33 50 0 45 21 10.85 7.35 488 154
5.1.4 Substructure + Foundation -554 831 0 831 0 3.85 3.85 3200 0
5.2 Seismic Force (Longitudianal)
5.2.3 Substructure + Foundation -554 0 831 0 831 3.85 3.85 0 3200
6 Centrifugal Force
Max P 0 111 0 101 47 10.85 7.35 1093 345
Max ML 0 89 0 81 38 10.85 7.35 879 278
Max MT 0 72 0 66 31 10.85 7.35 711 225
7 Wind Load
Live load max transverse case 0 97.90 24 78 64 10.50 7.35 823 467
On substructure 0 14 68 16 68 4.40 4.40 69 298
8 Construction Load
8.1 L.G. Case 1 (Max 'P') 0 0 0 0 0 7.00 7.00 0 0
8.2 L.G. Case 2 (Max 'ML') 0 0 0 0 0 7.00 7.00 0 0
8.3 L.G. Case 3 (Max 'MT') 0 0 0 0 0 7.00 7.00 0 0
8.4 Dead Load of the Superstructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.5 Dead Load of the Substructure 5018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8.6 Seismic Load of Superstructure 0 0 0 0 0 8.31 0.00 0 0
8.7 Seismic Load of Substructure 0 0 0 0 0 5.33 0.00 0 0
8 Water current
LWL Normal/Seismic
HFL Normal 32 36 13 46 3.35 3.65 45 168
HFL-seismic 28 33 12 42 3.53 3.78 41 157
9 Buyoyancy
LWL Normal/Seismic -1021
HFL Normal -1434
HFL-seismic -1434
10 Hydrodynamic
LWL Seismic 21 60 6 64 0.62 0.62 4 40
HFL Seismic 27 66 3 71 1.18 0.90 4 64
179
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.61 Seismic Force Combination Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m)
S.No Combination P Hz(HT') Hx (HL') Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L)
1 Seismic - Transverse
1.1 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max. P -429 2179 1141 15160 7517
1.2 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max. P 429 2179 1141 15160 7517
1.3 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max ML -426 2166 1135 15013 7470
1.4 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max ML 426 2166 1135 15013 7470
1.5 (0.3L+T-0.3V) Max MT -424 2155 1130 14899 7434
1.6 (0.3L+T+0.3V) Max MT 424 2155 1130 14899 7434
2 Seismic - Longitudinal
2.1 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max. P -414 1130 2120 8048 12671
2.2 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max. P 414 1130 2120 8048 12671
2.3 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max ML -414 1126 2118 8004 12658
2.4 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max ML 414 1126 2118 8004 12658
2.5 (L+0.3T-0.3V) Max MT -414 1123 2117 7969 12647
2.6 (L+0.3T+0.3V) Max MT 414 1123 2117 7969 12647
3 Seismic - Vertical
3.1 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max. P -1430 764 753 5356 4659
3.2 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max. P 1430 764 753 5356 4659
3.3 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max ML -1420 760 751 5312 4645
3.4 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max ML 1420 760 751 5312 4645
3.5 (0.3L+0.3T-V) Max MT -1413 756 749 5277 4634
3.6 (0.3L+0.3T+V) Max MT 1413 756 749 5277 4634
180
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.62 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom at SLS condition
LWL - Case
Moment Resultant
Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)

HFL - Case
Moment Resultant
Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m)
P kNm
(kN)
7 Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 14287 369 612 4334 4337 6131 Remark
181
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
1.63 Summary of Load for Base Pressure at pile cap bottom

LWL- Case
P
1 Group I (Case-1) 12865 352 619 4614 4689 6578
2 Group I (Case-2) 12533 336 611 2922 5754 6453
3 Group I (Case-3) 12411 323 605 7632 4483 8851
8 Group III (Case-1B) Seismic Transverse(+V) 12089 3235 1966 22986 13170 26492 Refer Annexure

10 12019 3214 1956 22449 13320 26103
(+V)

13 10951 1543 2933 11390 17230 20654
V)
14 12069 1543 2933 11390 17230 20654
Longitudinal(+V)
15 10885 1535 2929 10992 17424 20602
V)
16 12002 1535 2929 10992 17424 20602
Longitudinal(+V)
17 10860 1529 2927 11902 17160 20883
V)
18 11978 1529 2927 11902 17160 20883
Longitudinal(+V)
HFL- Case
Moment Resultant
Resolved H Force (kN) Resolved Moment (kN-m) kNm
P
(kN)
1 Group I (Case-1) 13505 365 665 4659 4857 6730
2 Group I (Case-2) 13173 349 657 2967 5922 6624
3 Group I (Case-3) 13051 337 652 7677 4651 8976
182
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha

10 12659 3223 2000 22490 13485 26223
(+V)

13 11591 1554 2982 11431 17412 20829
V)
14 12709 1554 2982 11431 17412 20829
Longitudinal(+V)
15 11525 1546 2978 11033 17606 20777
V)
16 12642 1546 2978 11033 17606 20777
Longitudinal(+V)
17 11500 1540 2976 11943 17342 21056
V)
18 12618 1540 2976 11943 17342 21056
Longitudinal(+V)
1.64 Summary of Load at pile cap bottom at ULS condition
LWL- CASE

1 Group I (Case-1) 18854 693 1112 8412 8207 11753
2 Group I (Case-2) 18355 608 1064 5231 9531 10872
3 Group I (Case-3) 18173 651 1092 12939 7899 15159
10 16894 4459 2403 30990 16021 34886
(+V)
Refer Annexure
13 15260 2306 4364 16822 25783 30786
V)
14 16936 2306 4364 16822 25783 30786
Longitudinal(+V)
15 15193 2295 4359 16394 25968 30710
V)
16 16869 2295 4359 16394 25968 30710
Longitudinal(+V)
17 15169 2287 4355 17281 25696 30967
V)
18 16845 2287 4355 17281 25696 30967
Longitudinal(+V)
183
4800197-GGN-
Job No. 4800197 DD-33
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
HFL - CASE

(kN) Hz(HT') Hx (HL') Mz (M'T) Mx(M'L) kNm
1 Group I (Case-1) 20214 707 1158 8457 8376 11903
2 Group I (Case-2) 19715 622 1110 5276 9699 11042
3 Group I (Case-3) 19533 665 1138 12984 8067 15286

10 17903 4468 2447 31031 16185 34999
(+V)
Refer Annexure
13 16268 2317 4413 16863 25965 30960
V)

14 17944 2317 4413 16863 25965 30960
Longitudinal(+V)

15 16202 2306 4408 16435 26150 30886
V)
16 17878 2306 4408 16435 26150 30886
Longitudinal(+V)
17 16177 2298 4405 17322 25878 31140
V)
18 17854 2298 4405 17322 25878 31140
Longitudinal(+V)
184
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation 4800197-GGN-

and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to DD-33
Job No. 4800197
KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in
the state of West Bengal Date

Design of Pier P1 for MJB at Ch: 121+255 14-Dec-18
Vishal Siddhartha
CALCULATION OF HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES ON BRIDGE
Under H.F.L. =>In longitudinal direction
Existing Levels Depth submerged

H.F.L. = 56.143 m Pier cap 0.000
Pier cap bottom level = 59.910 m Pier shaft 0.500
Pier shaft bottom level = 55.643 m Pile cap 1.453
Pile cap bottom level = 53.843 m
Max. Scour Level = 54.190 m
pile cap
radius of
pier shaft radius of enveloping
enveloping circle
circle
8.7
1.80 5.1
Dimension of pier shaft transverse direction 1.80

Dimension of pier shaft long direction 1.80
Radius ofenveloping circle trans 0.900
Radius ofenveloping circle long 0.900
Dimension of Pile cap in transverse direction 8.7

Dimension of Pile cap in long direction 5.1
Radius ofenveloping circle trans 4.4
Radius ofenveloping circle long 2.6
Horizontal Force due to hydromdynamic effect, F=Ce.Ah.We
where Ce : coefficient depends on ratio of height of submerged portion and radius of
enveloping circle
W e : weight of the enveloping cylinder in Kg
Ah : horizontal seismic coefficient
Design of Pier
185
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation 4800197-GGN-

and Upgradation by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to DD-33
Job No. 4800197
KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in

Vishal Siddhartha
Long Seismic
Element H r H/r Ce We Ah F
(m) (m) (t) (long) (kN)
Pier Shaft 0.5 0.900 0.556 0.39 1.272 0.18 0.876
Pile Cap 1.453 4.350 0.334 0.39 87.649 0.18 60.360
Point of application of loads

Elements C1 C3 C4 C3.F C4.H (m)
Pier Shaft 1 1 0.4286 0.876 0.214 from pier shaft base
Pile Cap 1 1 0.4286 60.360 0.623 from pile cap base
Under H.F.L. =>In Transverse direction

radius of
pier shaft radius of enveloping pile cap
enveloping circle
circle
5.1
1.8 8.7
Element H r H/r Ce We Ah F
(m) (m) (t) (trans) (kN)
Pier Shaft 0.5 0.900 0.556 0.39 1.272 0.18 0.876
Pile Cap 1.453 2.550 0.570 0.39 30.955 0.18 21.317

Elements C1 C3 C4 C3.F C4.H (m)
Pier Shaft 1 1 0.4286 0.876 0.214 from pier shaft base
Pile Cap 1 1 0.4286 21.317 0.623 from pile cap base
Design of Pier
186
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and 4800197-GGN-DD-33

Job No. 4800197
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state Date
of West Bengal

Vishal Siddhartha
CALCULATION OF HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES ON BRIDGE

(REFER: IS1893-3-Cl 11 )
Under H.F.L. =>In longitudinal direction
Existing Levels Depth submerged
H.F.L. = 59.350 m Pier cap 0.000 m
Pier cap bottom level = 59.910 m Pier shaft 3.707 m
Pier shaft bottom level = 55.643 m Pile cap 1.453 m
Pile cap bottom level = 53.843 m
Max. Scour Level = 54.190 m
pile cap
radius of
pier shaft radius of enveloping
enveloping circle
circle
8.7
1.80 5.1
Dimension of pier shaft transverse direction 1.80 m

Dimension of pier shaft long direction 1.80 m
Radius ofenveloping circle trans 0.900 m
Radius ofenveloping circle long 0.900 m
Dimension of Pile cap in transverse direction 8.7 m

Dimension of Pile cap in long direction 5.1 m
Radius ofenveloping circle trans 4.4 m
Radius ofenveloping circle long 2.6 m
Horizontal Force due to hydromdynamic effect, F=Ce.Ah.We
where Ce : coefficient depends on ratio of height of submerged portion and radius of
enveloping circle
We : weight of the enveloping cylinder in Kg
Ah : horizontal seismic coefficient
Long Seismic
Element H r H/r Ce We Ah F M
(m) (m) (t) (long) (kN) (kN-m)
Pier Shaft 3.707 0.900 4.119 0.73 9.433 0.18 12.160 19.320
Pile Cap 1.453 4.350 0.334 0.39 95.809 0.18 65.980 70.505 0.9022867
187
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and 4800197-GGN-DD-33

Job No. 4800197
154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state Date
of West Bengal

Vishal Siddhartha

Elements C1 C3 C4 C3.F C4.H (m) Level (m)
Pier Shaft 1 1 0.4286 12.160 1.589 from pier shaft base 57.232
Pile Cap 1 1 0.4286 65.980 0.623 from pile cap base 54.466
Under H.F.L. =>In Transverse direction

radius of
pier shaft radius of enveloping pile cap
enveloping circle
circle
5.1
1.8 8.7
Element H r H/r Ce We Ah F M
(m) (m) (t) (trans) (kN) (kN-m)
Pier Shaft 3.707 0.900 4.119 0.73 9.433 0.18 12.160 19.320
Pile Cap 1.453 2.550 0.570 0.39 39.115 0.18 26.937 46.190 1.181432

Elements C1 C3 C4 C3.F C4.H (m) Level (m)
Pier Shaft 1 1 0.4286 12.160 1.589 from pier shaft base 57.232
Pile Cap 1 1 0.4286 26.937 0.623 from pile cap base 54.466
188
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation 4800197-GGN-DD-33

by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Job No. 4800197
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Date

Vishal Siddhartha
2.0 Pier - Section Design
Pier Section
Dia of bar provided trans direction 64 nos 16 dia at each face

Dia of bar provided long direction 16 nos 16 dia at each face
Total Area 32153.6 mm^2
189


Vishal Siddhartha
ULS Section capacity check
UR 0.44 OK
190


Vishal Siddhartha
Shear Capacity due to concrete
Shear capacity of concrete is more than longitudnal shear force
SLS - stress check
Rare - critical combination
Limit
Stress in concrete 2.6 Mpa 16.8 Mpa ok
Stress in Steel 10 Mpa 400 Mpa ok
191


Vishal Siddhartha
Crack width - critical combination
As QP moments are less than cracking moments of section, therforcesection remains uncracked
Limit
Crack width 0 mm 0.3 mm OK
section is uncracked
Minimum Reinforcment for Pier
Vertical Reinforcement
Dia of vertical bars should not be less than 12 mm OK
Area of minimum RF provided should be greater of .1 Ned/fyd or .002Ac

3657.846 23040
Provided Ast 32153.60 OK
Transverse Reinforcement
Spacing Dia
Provided in Drawing 150 mm OK 12 mm OK
spacing of transverse RF should not be more than dia should not be less than
192 mm 8 mm
1800 mm 4 mm
200 mm
192
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning 4800197-GGN-DD-33
of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in Job No. 4800197

Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pile Foundation - Base Pressure
Eccentricity between Column
and C.G of Pile group = 0.00 m
5.1
Minimum Thickness of Pile
cap = 1.8 m
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m -1.8, 3.6 1.8, 3.6
Pile diameter = 1.2 m
Pier Size = 1.8 X 5.80 8.7 MT
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m 3 B B

Self weight of Pile cap = 200 t -1.8, 0 1.8, 0
Total Length L1+Lf (Max scour) = 7.4 m
Length of pile = 17 m
Reduction factor for pile B.M = 0.82 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5)
Loads on Pile
-1.8, -3.6 1.8, -3.6
Normal-LWL Seismic & WInd - LWL
Maximum Pile Load = 301 t. OK 483 OK A
Minimum Pile Load = 112 t. OK -110 OK Max. horizontal load on pile ULS = 17 T OK
Normal-HFL Seismic - HFL .
Maximum Pile Load = 314 OK 495.53 OK
Minimum Pile Load = 121 OK -92 OK
Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
Type of Load case Sr no Pile capacity from soil investigation report = 530 t 662.5 t
Normal Load case 1 to 3 Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 100 t 125 t
LWL -Case
Vertical Load due to Load due BM for pile

load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) ML -P1 to MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1
1287 461 469 62 35 214 43 32 290 139 12 36
N
o 2
1253 292 575 61 34 209 53 20 282 135 12 35
r
m
a 3
l 1241 763 448 61 32 207 42 53 301 112 11 35
4
1252 627 599 82 54 209 55 44 308 110 16 50
W 5
i 1218 386 675 77 45 203 63 27 292 114 15 45
n
6
d 1206 959 588 82 54 201 54 67 322 80 16 50
7 1093 2271 1451 197 324 182 134 158 474 -110 63 191
8 1209 2299 1317 197 324 201 122 160 483 -80 63 191
9 1087 2245 1332 196 321 181 123 156 460 -98 63 190
10 1202 2245 1332 196 321 200 123 156 480 -79 63 190
11 1085 2324 1302 195 320 181 121 161 463 -101 62 189
12 1199 2324 1302 195 320 200 121 161 482 -82 62 189
S 13 1095 1139 1723 293 154 183 160 79 421.15 -56 55 168
e 14 1207 1139 1723 293 154 201 160 79 439.78 -37 55 168
i
s 15 1088 1099 1742 293 153 181 161 76 419.08 -56 55 167
m 16 1200 1099 1742 293 153 200 161 76 437.70 -38 55 167
i
c 17 1086 1190 1716 293 153 181 159 83 422.54 -61 55 167
18 1198 1190 1716 293 153 200 159 83 441.17 -42 55 167
19 958 807 707 114 109 160 65 56 281.17 38 26 80
20 1344 807 707 114 109 224 65 56 345.54 102 26 80
21 953 768 726 113 108 159 67 53 279.32 38 26 79
22 1336 768 726 113 108 223 67 53 343.24 102 26 79
23 951 863 708 114 108 159 66 60 284.02 33 26 80
24 1333 863 708 114 108 222 66 60 347.59 97 26 80
193
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four-Laning 4800197-GGN-DD-33
of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in Job No. 4800197

Vishal Siddhartha
HFL Case
Vertical Load due to Load due BM for pile

load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) ML -P1 to MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. (T) (T) (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1
N 1351 466 486 66 37 225 45 32 302.41 148 13 38
o
r 2
1317 297 592 66 35 220 55 21 294.98 144 12 38
m
a 3
l 1305 768 465 65 34 218 43 53 313.90 121 12 37
4 1316 632 616 87 55 219 57 44 320.18 118 17 52
W 5
i 1282 391 692 82 47 214 64 27 304.97 122 16 48
n
6
d 1270 964 605 87 55 212 56 67 334.68 89 17 52
7 1157 2275 1333 201 324 193 123 158 474.28 -89 64 193
8 1273 2303 1333 201 324 212 123 160 495.53 -71 64 193
9 1151 2249 1348 200 322 192 125 156 472.84 -89 63 192
10 1266 2249 1348 200 322 211 125 156 492.02 -70 63 192
11 1149 2328 1318 199 321 191 122 162 475.15 -92 63 191
12 1263 2328 1318 199 321 211 122 162 494.22 -73 63 191
13 1159 1143 1741 298 155 193 161 79 433.79 -47 56 170
S
e 14 1271 1143 1741 298 155 212 161 79 452.41 -29 56 170
i 15 1152 1103 1761 298 155 192 163 77 431.71 -48 56 170
s
m 16 1264 1103 1761 298 155 211 163 77 450.34 -29 56 170
i 17 1150 1194 1734 298 154 192 161 83 435.18 -52 56 169
c
18 1262 1194 1734 298 154 210 161 83 453.80 -33 56 169
19 1022 812 723 118 110 170 67 56 293.64 47 27 82
20 1408 812 723 118 110 235 67 56 358.01 111 27 82
21 1017 772 743 118 109 169 69 54 291.79 47 27 81
22 1400 772 743 118 109 233 69 54 355.71 111 27 81
23 1015 867 725 118 109 169 67 60 296.50 42 27 82
24 1397 867 725 118 109 233 67 60 360.07 105 27 82
194
Detailed Engineering Consultancy Services for Rehabiliation and Upgradation by Four- 4800197-GGN-DD-33
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur- Job No. 4800197
Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Date
Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pile Foundation - SLS
No. of piles = 6 5.1

0
Column and C.G of Pile = m
3.6 3.6 0.85
Pile cap = 1.8 m
Thickness of pile cap = 1.8 m
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m
Pier Size = 1.8 X 5.80
0 0
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m3

Self weight of Pile cap = 199.7 t 8.7
Total Length L1+Lf = 7.4 m
Length of pile = 17.0 m

Reduction factor for pile B.M = 0.82 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5) -3.6 -3.6
Loads on Pile
Normal HFL
Maximum Pile Load = 329 t. 348
Calculation of loads on piles for each load combination Max. horizontal load on pile = 15.33 T

Load due to ML = =
Load due to MT = =
1 x 51.8 14.4 Pile capacity from soil investigation report 530 t
Type of Load case Sr no Maximum uplift Capacity of Pile = 100 t
Normal Load case-rare 1 to 3 Lateral pile capacity from soil investigation reporty 40 t
Wind Load case -rare 4 to 6
Normal Load case-frequent 7 to 9
Wind Load case -frquent 10 to 12
Quasi Permanent 13 ( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL - Case

Load Max. Resultant
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 Min. load (T) =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. load (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1 1368 561 547 74 46 228 51 39 318 138 15 44

2 1335 349 635 71 41 223 59 24 306 139 14 41
3 1323 863 527 73 43 220 49 60 329 112 14 43
4 1312 512 482 67 45 219 45 36 299 139 13 41
5 1287 313 532 62 37 215 49 22 286 144 12 37
6 1278 743 468 66 43 213 43 52 308 118 13 40
7 1330 429 417 57 36 222 39 30 290 153 11 34
8 1305 266 482 54 31 217 45 18 281 154 10 31
9 1295 661 403 56 34 216 37 46 299 133 11 33
10 1233 192 172 25 18 205 16 13 235 176 5 15
11 1226 115 175 22 14 204 16 8 229 180 4 13
12 1224 253 168 24 18 204 16 18 237 171 5 15
13 1220 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 203 203 0 0
195
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur- Job No. 4800197
Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Date
Vishal Siddhartha
HFL - Case
Load Max. Resultant
load P MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) HT (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 Min. load (T) =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. load (T) H (T)
(T) (T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1 1468 565 564 79 48 245 52 39 336 153 15 47

2 1434 353 652 76 42 239 60 25 324 154 14 44
3 1422 867 543 77 45 237 50 60 348 126 15 45
4 1411 516 499 71 46 235 46 36 317 153 14 43
5 1386 318 548 67 38 231 51 22 304 158 13 39
6 1377 748 485 71 45 230 45 52 326 133 14 42
7 1429 433 434 61 37 238 40 30 308 168 12 36
8 1404 271 498 59 32 234 46 19 299 169 11 34
9 1395 665 420 60 35 232 39 46 318 147 12 35
10 1332 196 189 29 19 222 17 14 253 191 6 18
11 1325 119 192 27 15 221 18 8 247 195 5 15
12 1323 258 185 29 19 220 17 18 256 185 6 18
13 1319 0 0 0 0 220 0 0 220 220 0 0
..1 Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile for Maximum scour

T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm2 = 32000000 kn/m^2
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in cm4= 0.1017876 m^4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1 = 4950 kn/m^3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - NORMAL = t
CASE (MAX) 15.3338
T = (32000000 * 0.101787601976309 / 4950) ^ 0.2 ) = 3.7 m
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 0.0 m

= 0.0 m
L1 / T = 0.0 / 3.7 = 0.0
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2
Lf = 2 * 3.7 = 7.4 m
= 7.4 m
3
= Q * (L1 + Lf) / (12[pile
Y * E head
= 0.0016 m
1.6 mm

where
196

by Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A)
Job No. 4800197 Date
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal
Design of Pile Vishal Siddhartha 14-12-2018
Pile Desgin-SLS
LWL - Case HFL - Case

S.no P ML MT HL HT S.no P ML MT HL HT
1 -1385 442 0 146 0 1 -1531 465 0 153 0
2 -1395 413 0 136 0 2 -1541 437 0 144 0
3 -1118 429 0 141 0 3 -1265 452 0 149 0
4 -1385 407 0 134 0 4 -1532 430 0 142 0
5 -1435 365 0 120 0 5 -1582 389 0 128 0
6 -1180 399 0 132 0 6 -1327 423 0 139 0
7 -2033 0 0 0 0 7 -2198 0 0 0 0
Pile design
SLS - Stress check
stress Limit
Compressive stress -2.7 Mpa 16.8 Mpa OK
Stress in steel 12.3 Mpa 400 Mpa OK
Result of critical case - SLS rare
Limit
Crack width 0 mm 0.3 mm OK
section is uncracked
197
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari Job No. 4800197
section in the state of West Bengal
Date
Design of Pile 14-12-2018
Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pile Foundation-ULS
5.1
No. of piles = 6
Eccentricity between Column
0
and C.G of Pile group = m
3.6 3.6 0.85
Minimum Thickness of Pile
cap = 1.8 m
Pile offset from edge = 0.15 m
0 0
Area of pile = 1.131 m2 8.7
Pier Size = 1.8 X 5.80
Unit Weight of R.C.C = 2.5 t/m3

Self weight of Pile cap = 199.7 t
Scouring length of Pile Max scour HFL-S LWL-S
-3.6 -3.6
Total Length L1+Lf = 7.4 m 7.4 m 6.9 m
Length of pile = 17.0 m
Reduction factor for pile B.M = 0.82 (IS 2911 part 1, sec iv, fig 5)

Load due to ML = =
MT x 3.6 MT
Load due to MT = =
1 x 51.8 14.4
Type of Load case Sr no
Normal Load case 1 to 3
Wind Load case 4 to 6
Trans seismic Load case 7 to 12
Long seismic Load case 13 to 18
Vertical seismic load case 19 to 24
Accidental Load case 25 to 30
( self wt of pile excluded)
LWL- Case
Load due Load due BM for pile
Load Vertical HT Max. Min. load Resultant
MT (T-m) ML (T-m) HL (T) P/n (T) to ML -P1 to MT -P1 =H(L1+Lf)/2
no. load P (T) (T) load (T) (T) H (T)
(T-m) (T-m) (T-m)
1 1885 841 821 111 69 314 76 58 449 180 22 66
2 1835 523 953 106 61 306 88 36 430 181 20 62
3 1817 1294 790 109 65 303 73 90 466 140 21 64
4 1805 633 605 84 53 301 56 44 401 201 17 50
5 1767 477 812 95 56 294 75 33 403 186 18 56
6 1753 1134 714 101 66 292 66 79 437 147 20 61

7 1523 3163 1590 242 449 254 147 220 621 -113 85 258
8 1697 3163 1590 242 449 283 147 220 650 -84 85 258
9 1517 3099 1602 240 446 253 148 215 616 -111 84 256
10 1689 3099 1602 240 446 282 148 215 645 -82 84 256
11 1515 3171 1570 239 444 252 145 220 618 -113 84 255
12 1687 3171 1570 239 444 281 145 220 647 -85 84 255
13 1526 1682 2578 436 231 254 239 117 610 -101 82 250
14 1694 1682 2578 436 231 282 239 117 638 -73 82 250
15 1519 1639 2597 436 229 253 240 114 608 -101 82 249
16 1687 1639 2597 436 229 281 240 114 635 -73 82 249
17 1517 1728 2570 436 229 253 238 120 611 -105 82 249
18 1684 1728 2570 436 229 281 238 120 639 -77 82 249
19 1320 1177 1038 163 162 220 96 82 398 42 38 116
20 1899 1177 1038 163 162 317 96 82 494 139 38 116
21 1315 1134 1057 163 161 219 98 79 396 43 38 116
22 1891 1134 1057 163 161 315 98 79 492 139 38 116
23 1315 1223 1030 162 160 219 95 85 399 39 38 115
24 1887 1223 1030 162 160 314 95 85 495 134 38 115
198
Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A) Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari Job No. 4800197
section in the state of West Bengal
Date
Vishal Siddhartha
HFL - Case
1 2021 846 838 116 71 337 78 59 473 201 23 69
2 1971 528 970 111 62 329 90 37 455 202 21 64
3 1953 1298 807 114 66 326 75 90 490 161 22 67
4 1941 637 622 89 54 324 58 44 425 222 17 53
5 1903 482 829 99 57 317 77 33 427 207 19 58
6 1889 1139 731 105 67 315 68 79 462 168 21 63

7 1624 3167 1607 246 450 271 149 220 639 -98 85 259
8 1798 3167 1607 246 450 300 149 220 668 -69 85 259
9 1618 3103 1619 245 447 270 150 215 635 -96 85 258
10 1790 3103 1619 245 447 298 150 215 664 -67 85 258
11 1616 3176 1586 244 445 269 147 221 637 -98 84 256
12 1787 3176 1586 244 445 298 147 221 665 -70 84 256
13 1627 1686 2597 441 232 271 240 117 629 -86 83 252
14 1794 1686 2597 441 232 299 240 117 657 -58 83 252
15 1620 1644 2615 441 231 270 242 114 626 -86 83 252
16 1788 1644 2615 441 231 298 242 114 654 -58 83 252
17 1618 1732 2588 440 230 270 240 120 630 -90 83 251
18 1785 1732 2588 440 230 298 240 120 657 -62 83 251
19 1421 1181 1055 167 163 237 98 82 417 57 39 118
20 2000 1181 1055 167 163 333 98 82 513 154 39 118
21 1416 1138 1073 167 162 236 99 79 414 58 39 118
22 1992 1138 1073 167 162 332 99 79 510 154 39 118
23 1415 1227 1046 167 161 236 97 85 418 54 39 117
24 1988 1227 1046 167 161 331 97 85 513 149 39 117
Load case No:7 to 24 seismic load combination is taken as 1.35 times the forces transmitted to it by substructure as per Cl.219.8 of IRC : 6-2017.
Calculation of depth of fixity and maximum moment in pile for HFL scour
Max scour
T = (E * I / K1)^0.2
where
E = 2 = 32000000 kn/m^2
Youngs Modulus of the concrete in kg/cm
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section in =cm 4 0.1017876 m^4
K1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction as per Table 1= 4900 kn/m^3
Q = Resultant horizontal force on pile - =
NORMAL CASE (MAX) 22.6 t
= Resultant horizontal force on pile - =
SEISMIC 85.5 t
T = (32000000 * 0.101787601976309 / 4900) ^ 0.2

= ) 3.7 m
HFL-S scour LWL-S- Scour
L1 = Free length of pile above ground level = 0.0 m -0.86 m -1.379 m
= 0.0 m -0.9 m -1.4 m
L1 / T = 0.0 / 3.7 = 0.0 -0.24 -0.376
Lf / T = (fig 2 - for fixed headed piles in sands ) = 2 2.25 2.25
Lf = 2 * 3.7 = 7.4 m 8.3 m 8.3 m

= 7.4 m 8.3 m 8.3 m
Y = Q * (L1 + Lf)3 / (12 *[pile

E * I)head deflection of equivalent cantilever for fixed head pile]
= 0.0023 m
2.3 mm

where
199
4800197-GGN-DD-33
Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A)
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Job No. 4800197 Date

Vishal Siddhartha
Pile Desgin- ULS
LWL - Case HFL - Case

S.no P ML MT HT HL S.no P ML MT HT HL
1 -1798 663 0 0 218 1 -2006 686 0 0 226
2 -1813 620 0 0 204 2 -2021 643 0 0 212
3 -1399 643 0 0 212 3 -1607 667 0 0 220
4 -2009 502 0 0 165 4 -2217 525 0 0 173
5 -1862 557 0 0 184 5 -2070 580 0 0 191
6 -1473 608 0 0 200 6 -1681 631 0 0 208
7 1131 2579 0 0 850 7 981 2593 0 0 855
8 841 2579 0 0 850 8 691 2593 0 0 855
9 1107 2562 0 0 844 9 957 2576 0 0 849
10 820 2562 0 0 844 10 670 2576 0 0 849
11 1131 2549 0 0 840 11 981 2564 0 0 845
12 845 2549 0 0 840 12 695 2564 0 0 845
13 1012 2496 0 0 823 13 864 2521 0 0 831
14 733 2496 0 0 823 14 584 2521 0 0 831
15 1011 2491 0 0 821 15 862 2515 0 0 829
16 731 2491 0 0 821 16 583 2515 0 0 829
17 1051 2488 0 0 820 17 903 2512 0 0 828
18 772 2488 0 0 820 18 623 2512 0 0 828
19 -421 1162 0 0 383 19 -571 1181 0 0 389
20 -1387 1162 0 0 383 20 -1537 1181 0 0 389
21 -426 1156 0 0 381 21 -576 1175 0 0 387
22 -1385 1156 0 0 381 22 -1535 1175 0 0 387
23 -388 1152 0 0 380 23 -538 1171 0 0 386
24 -1342 1152 0 0 380 24 -1492 1171 0 0 386
Design of Pile section Fagus - ULS
Reinforcement details
Cross - section Main steel Shear RF
no. of bar 21 no. of bar 21 dia 16 mm
dia 25 dia 25 mm spacing 150 mm
Total Asr 10308.35089 Total Asr 10308.35 mm^2
200
4800197-GGN-DD-33
Four-Laning of NH-31D from KM 113.20 to KM 154.854 (Package-II A)
Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the state of West Bengal Job No. 4800197 Date

Vishal Siddhartha
Reinforcement details
Section check
UR 0.92 OK
201
Annexure - I
General
Ductile detailing shall be carried out for bridges located in zones III,IV and V of
seismic zone map of IRC:6
For Pier bottom level:

NEd = 15904 kN
Ac = 11520000 mm2
As = 32154 mm2
fck = 35 N/mm2 fy = 500 N/mm2
hk = 0.039 < 0.08
Minimum confining reinforcement required
fyd = 435 N/mm2 fcd = 16 N/mm2
Confining reinforcement ratio w wd = rwfyd/fcd
5650.369837 mm
B core dimension (along trans dimension)
1650 mm
D core dimension (along longitudinal dimension)
Dia. Of stirrup along B f = 12 mm
no. of legs along width (along trans dimension) = 27
Area of the stirupps and ties Asp = 3054 mm2
Dia. Of stirrup along D f = 10 mm
no. of legs along Depth (along long dimension) = 10
Area of the stirupps and ties Asp = 785 mm2
2
Confined area = 9323110.231 mm
100 mm
Spacing of hoops or ties SL =
Minimum Spacing is 200 Ref Fig 17.2 of Code 112
Volumetric ratio Pw, B (along trans dimension) = 0.005404298
Volumetric ratio Pw, D (along long dimension) = 0.004759989

ωwd
B = 0.150300297 min 0.12
ωwd
D = 0.132381261 min 0.12
Area of gross concrete section Ac = 11520000 mm2
Confined concrete area within the outside

dia of hoop ACC
9323110 mm2
=
Normalised axial force hk = 0.0394
reinforcement ratio rL = 0.003

w w req = -0.008
Minimum design confining ωwd
reinforcement = 0.120
O.K
Extent of confining reinforcement
Since nk < 0.3, Length of confinment = 1.8000 m

Refer:- IRC:112-2011 Cl 17.2.1.4
Confinement RF
202
DESIGN OF PIER CAP
203
INPUT AND
LOAD CALCULATIONS
204

Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to
km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pier Cap at Ch. 121+255 17-12-2018
Design of Pier Cap

The Wall Pier is rectangular in shape of dimension 1.8mx5.2m, with round corners 0.9m radius. The width of Pier Cap is 3.4m minimum in the
longitudinal direction. The pier cap is essentially subjected to bending moments predominantly in the transverse direction, as the outer
bearings are placed on cantilever part of pier cap.
Skew Angle = 25 deg cos q = 0.906 1/cos q = 1.103
13.2
0.662 3.310 3.310 3.31013 3.31013 0.662027
0.681 P1 P3 P3 P1
P1
1.269
3.9
1.269
A2
P2 P4 P4 P2
0.681
Size of the pedestal = 800 x 800 mm

Size of the Bearing = 500 x 500 mm
Width of the Pier = 5.2 m. Length = 1.8 m.

Side of the equivalent square = 4.61 m. Eqv Cutwater = 0.64 m
a1 a2 a3 a4 skew dist from face of eqv cutwater
Distance between point of load and Pier edge a = 2.768 3.97 0 0.662 m.
Distance fopr checking at face of pedestal a1 = 0.4 m.
Overall depth at junction = 1.70 m
Clear cover of the pier cap = 50 mm.
Assuming 34 nos 25 dia bars in top layer
34 nos 25 dia bars in 2nd layer
14 legged 12 dia @ 150 c/c stirrups
Effective depth d = 1.601 m
a/d 2.11 O.K. DESIGN AS CANTILEVER
Design of Pier Cap 3
205

Vishal Siddhartha
Load Calculation ALWAYS PUT P2/P4 AS MAX REACTION SIDE BEARINGS
P1 P3
Dead load for P1 = 53.70 59.00 t. **Load on permanent bearing during service
SIDL for P1 = 19.80 -5.40 t. stage is taken from Grillage Analysis.
SIDL(varying) for P1 = 8.10 8.10 t. P1 P2 P3 P4
P2 P4 115.95 150.30 87.70 113.70 Total
Dead load for P2 = 53.70 59.00 t. a1 a2 a3 a4
SIDL for P2 = 19.80 -5.40 t. 2.77 3.97 0.00 0.66
SIDL(varying) for P2 = 8.10 8.10 t. 320.95 596.9916 0 75.2694 Moments
Selfweight of the piercap = 11.94 t/m. ** Wt of cantilever part of pier cap is
Wt of Transverse Stopper = 7.20 t. converted to udl
Lever arm = 3.50 m Shear
P1 P2 P3 P4 Total
Dead load = 53.7 53.7 0 59 166.4
SIDL = 19.8 19.8 0 -5.4 34.2
SIDL(varying) = 8.1 8.1 0 8.1 24.3
LL = 34.35 68.7 0 52 155.05
Moment
P1 P2 P3 P4 Total
Dead load = 148.642 213.2964 0 39.058 401.0
SIDL = 54.8064 78.6456 0 -3.5748 129.9
SIDL(varying) = 22.4208 32.1732 0 5.3622 60.0
LL = 95.0808 272.8764 0 34.424 402.4
Load Calculation for CWLL
Case-1: For maximum reaction/max transverse moment case
P1 P3 Impact Factor = 1.00 (Impact Factor is 50% for Pier Cap )
Reaction on P1 = 34.35 26.00 t
Reaction on P1 due to transverse moment = ± 0.00 t (Impact Factor is 50% for Pier Cap )
P2 P4
Reaction on P2 = 68.70 52.00 t
Reaction on P2 due to transverse moment = ± 0.00 t
Total reaction on P1+P3 = 203.65 t ** Ref CWLL analysis page for total LL
Total reaction on P2 +P4 = 264.00 t Reaction. It is distributed among 10 bearings
Total reaction on the piercap = 467.65 t

Hence moment due to piercap reaction = 993.21 t-m
Torsional moment due to unbalanced reaction = -69.41 t-m
Equivalent B.M = -58.63 t-m
Equivalent Shear = -28.48 t S/w of cap - shear
Moment due to selfweight of the piercap = 128.63 t-m 56.906 t
& for trans. Seismic stopper
Hence total moment on the pier cap = 1063.22 t-m
Case-2: For maximum torsional moment case (One Span Dislodged case)
LL Reaction on P1 = 0.00 t
Reaction on P1 due to transverse moment = ± 0.00 t
ALWAYS PUT P2/P4 AS MAX REACTION SIDE BEARINGS ** Ref CWLL analysis page for total LL
Total reaction on P1+P3 = 0.00 t Reaction. It is distributed among 10 bearings
Total reaction on P2+P4= 264.00 t of one side span only
Total reaction on the Piercap = 264.00 t

Hence moment due to piercap reaction = 672.26 t-m
Torsional moment due to unbalanced reaction = 335.02 t-m
Equivalent B.M = 282.97 t-m
Equivalent Shear = 137.44 t
Hence total moment on the pier cap = 1083.86 t-m
From the above it is clear that maximum Transverse moment case is governing.
206
SUMMARY OF FORCES
AND MOMENTS
207
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km.
113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-
Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC Designed by: Checked by: Date
mode Vishal Siddhartha
SUMMARY OF FORCES & MOMENTS
Summary of Forces & Moments - ULS
P1/P2 for Max. P & Max. Mt case

Factored Factored
Loads Load Factor Shear Moment
Shear Moment
T T-m T T-m
Dead load 1.35 166.400 401.00 224.640 541.345
Dead load of Pier cap 1.35 56.906 128.63 76.823 173.654
SIDL 1.35 34.200 129.88 46.170 175.334
SIDL - Wearing course 1.75 24.300 59.96 42.525 104.923
LL 1.5 155.050 402.38 232.575 603.572
622.733 1598.828
P1/P2 for Max. Torsion case

Factored Factored Factored
Shear Moment Torsion
T T-m T T-m T-m
Dead load 1.35 112.700 252.35 152.145 340.678
Dead load of Pier cap 1.35 56.906 128.633 76.823 173.654
SIDL 1.35 14.400 75.07 19.440 101.346
LL - Normal position 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000
Normal Combination 276.758 681.365 452.272
Summary of Forces & Moments - Rare Combination

Factored Factored
Shear Moment
T T-m T T-m
Dead load 1 166.400 400.996 166.400 400.996
Dead load of Pier cap 1 56.906 128.633 56.906 128.633
SIDL 1 34.200 129.877 34.200 129.877
LL - Normal position 1 155.050 402.381 155.050 402.381
Left side 441.716 1133.835

Factored Factored
Shear Moment
kN kN-m kN kN-m
Dead load 1 112.700 252.354 112.700 252.354
SIDL 1 14.400 75.071 14.400 75.071
Normal Combination 203.446 501.100

208

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Summary of Forces & Moments - Quasi-Permanent Combination

Factored Factored
Shear Moment
kN kN-m kN kN-m
Dead load 1 166.400 400.996 166.400 400.996
SIDL 1 34.200 129.877 34.200 129.877
Normal position 286.666 731.453

Factored Factored
Shear Moment
kN kN-m kN kN-m
Dead load 1 112.700 252.354 112.700 252.354
SIDL 1 14.400 75.071 14.400 75.071
LL - Footpath 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
203.446 501.100
Summary of forces and moments at face of pedastal Only P1+P2 FOR THIS CASE
Factored Factored
Shear Moment
T T-m T T-m
Dead load 1.35 107.400 42.96 144.990 57.996
Dead load of Pier cap upto
9.810 13.244 5.297
pedastal face 1.35 3.92
SIDL 1.35 39.600 15.84 53.460 21.384
LL 1.5 103.050 41.22 154.575 61.830
Total 394.619 157.847
Torsion in Span Dislodged case Only P2 FOR THIS CASE

Factored Factored
Shear Moment
T T-m T T-m
Dead load 1.35 53.700 21.48 72.495 28.998
Dead load of Pier cap upto
1.35 9.810 3.92 13.244 5.297
pedastal face
SIDL 1.35 19.800 7.92 26.730 10.692
LL - Normal position 1.5 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000
Normal Combination 126.644 50.657

209
ULS CHECK
210
Vishal Siddhartha
Concrete grade M35

Steel Grade Fe550

Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combinationfck 0.48
N/mm² 16.80
N/mm² 330.00
STRENGTH CHECK
Sl No. Parameters Units Pier cap
1 MOMENT KN-M 15988

MATERIAL DATA
10 α 0.67
Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd =
12 Mpa 15.63
αfck/Уm)
Geometric Data
17 Number of bars Nos. 34
19 Number of bars Nos. 34
22 Hence Pt= (100*Ast/bd) % 0.53
23 Dia of Shear Reinforcement mm 12
24 Spacing of reinforcement mm 150
25 number of legs Nos. 14 These legs excludes outer stirrup for torsion
26 Reinforcement(%)
Design of Pier Cap

211
Vishal Siddhartha

28 Status O.K.
30 Status O.K.
Strength of section
33 λ 0.80
34 η 1.00
43 Status O.K.
44 Effective As long for only Bending mm² 22748
45 DFtd KN 3113.67
46 As long for additional tensile RF from Shear force mm² 6507
47 UR for combined shear + bending 0.88
48 Status O.K.
49 Max. strain on concrete in comp. 0.0035
50 Max. strain on reinf. in tension 0.0044
51 Max. depth of NA From Comp. Flange mm 710
52 Status (under/Reinf, Over Reinf or Bal) U/R
53 fctm MPa 2.80
54 Min. reinforcement mm² 8262
55 Status O.K.
Shear Resistance
57 0.5d = mm 800
58 2d = mm 3201
59 αv = m 2.768
60 β= 0.865
62 K = 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.353
63 σcp MPa 0.000
64 ρ1=At/(bd)<=0.02 0.005
65 Vmin = 0.031*k^(3/2).fck^(1/2) KN 0.289
KN 2476
67 [0.12.K(80p1fck)^0.33+(0.15σcp)]bwd
KN 1803
70 Status (if 0 = reinf. Not reqd;or 1 = reinf reqd) 1.
71 Design shear force (Ved) KN 5385
72 Design yield strength. of shear reinf. (fywd=fyd) MPa 478.26
73 Cotθ 1.00
74 Required area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 1172
75 Nos 14
76 Provided area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 1583
77 shear capacity w/ vertical shear renf.(Vrd,s) KN 7272
78 αcw 1.00
79 V1 0.53
80 Max. shear Capcity w/ vertical shear renf. (VRd,max) KN 23373
81 Final shear Capcity (VRd) KN 7272
82 UR for only shear= 0.74
83 Status O.K.
Design of Pier Cap

212
Vishal Siddhartha
As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011, Minimum Shear Reinforcement.
84 Min. Shear Reinforcement Asw min/s mm²/mm 2.9430

87 Area of reinforcement Asw/s provided mm² 10.56
88 Status O.K.
89 Shear Check at face of Pedastal

90 Net shear kN 3946
91 bw = mm 3900
91 Depth at face of pedestal = mm 1045
92 Eff depth at face of pedestal = d mm 945
93 K = 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.460
94 σcp MPa 0.000
95 ρ1=At/(bd)<=0.02 0.009
96 Vmin = 0.031*k^(3/2).fck^(1/2) KN 0.324
KN 1877
98 [0.12.K(80p1fck)^0.33+(0.15σcp)]bwd
KN 1193
104 Cotθ 1.00
105 Required area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm² 1455
106 Provided area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) 1583
108 αcw 1.00
109 V1 0.53
113 Status O.K.
Torsion check for Long Direction in One span dislodged case:

114 Torsion TED KN-m 507
115 q 45
116 Sin q 0.707
117 Cos q 0.707
118 D at pedestal location m 1.04
119 B at pedestal location m 3.90
120 Area (A) at pedestal location m^2 4.07
121 Outer perimeter (u) m 9.89
122 tef (m) only for one outer web m 0.412
123 Ak m^2 3.10
124 TRd, max = KN-m 10623
125 Only Torsion UR 0.048
126 Shear Torsion Interaction UR 0.334
127 REMARKS OK
128 If q = 45 deg, both Ast and Asl for Torsion will be same.
129 Ast / st = TED / (2*Ak*fyd*cot q) (mm2/mm). 0.171 Only 1 Leg of outer closed link will be considered
130 Provided Bar Dia mm 16 Outer closed stirrup
131 Spacing mm 150
132 Ast/st provided (mm2/mm). 1.340
133 OK
134 AsL / sL = TED *cot q/ (2*Ak*fyd) (mm2/mm). 0.171
135 Width of pier cap mm 3900
136 AsL reqd (mm2) 666.596
137 Provided Bar of pier cap (mm2) 33379 Bars are uniformly distrubuted along the width
138 % pf RF of Max provd for Bending ULS 0.02
Ithis will slightly enhance Bending UR, but again in the span dislodged case, the Bending UR itself will
139
be very low. Hence, Torsion is not governing & provided RF is suffi ent to cater for.
140
141 For other faces, Provided Bar Dia mm 12
142 Spacing mm 150
143 AsL / sL provided (mm2/mm). 0.754
OK
Design of Pier Cap

213
SLS CHECK
214

the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
Vishal Siddhartha
STRESS CHECK
1 MOMENT KN-M 11338.35
2 MATERIAL DATA
10 α 0.67
12 Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd = Mpa 15.63
13 Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Ecm) GPa 32
14 Geometric Data
16 Total depth of slab mm 1700
26 number of legs Nos. 14
27 Reinforcement(%) 0
28 Effective depth of section (d = D-c-φ/2) mm 1638
29 Stress Check
30 Concrete Cross Sectional Area (Ac) mm² 6630000
32 Notional size (=2Ac/u) mm 1184
33 Age of loading Days 28
34 Relative humidity % 80
35 Final creep co-efficent of 28 days (φ) 1.50
36 Effective modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Mpa 12800
37 Modular ratio 15.63
38 Allowable stress in steel Mpa 330
39 Allowable stress in Concrete Mpa 16.80
40 K=sqrt{2*pt*m+(pt*m)2-pt*m 0.334
41 Postion of NA axis from compression flange (x) mm 546
42 MOA of Compression area mm² 5.82E+08
43 MOA of Tension Area mm² 5.82E+08
44 Diff. mm² 0.00E+00
45 MOI of Cracked Section mm4 8.33E+11
46 Stress in tension reinforcement σst MPa 233
UR 0.71
47 Status O.K.
48 Stress in concrete Mpa 7.44
UR 0.44
49 Status O.K.
Design of Pier Cap

215

section in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode
Vishal Siddhartha
CRACK WIDTH CHECK
1 MOMENT KN-M 7315
2 MATERIAL DATA
10 α 0.67
12 Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd = Mpa 15.63
13 Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Ecm) GPa 32
14 Geometric Data
16 Total depth of slab mm 1700
19 Number of bars mm 34
21 Number of bars mm 34
Hence Pt= (100*Ast/bd) % 0.53
26 number of legs Nos. 14
27 Reinforcement(%) 0
28 Effective depth of section (d = D-c-φ/2) mm 1638
29 Whether the section is Cracked or not?
30 Uncracked MOI of the gross section mm^4 1.6E+12
31 Stress At extreme fibers MPa 3.89
32 fctm MPa 2.80
33 Status Cracked
29 Stress Check
Crack
30 Status check
reqd.
30 Concrete Cross Sectional Area (Ac) mm² 6630000
32 Notional size (=2Ac/u) mm 1184
33 Age of loading Days 28
34 Relative humidity % 80
35 Final creep co-efficent of 28 days (φ) 1.50
36 Effective modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Mpa 12800
37 Modular ratio 15.63
38 Allowable stress in steel Mpa 330
39 Allowable stress in Concrete Mpa 16.8
40 K=sqrt{2*pt*m+(pt*m)2-pt*m 0.334
41 Postion of NA axis from compression flange (x) mm 546
42 MOA of Compression area mm² 5.82E+08
43 MOA of Tension Area mm² 5.82E+08
Design of Pier Cap

216

Vishal Siddhartha
44 Diff. mm² 0.00E+00
45 MOI of Cracked Section mm4 8.33E+11
46 Stress in tension reinforcement σsc MPa 151
47 Status O.K.
48 Stress in concrete Mpa 4.798
49 Status O.K.
50 Crack Check
51 αe = Es/Ecm 6.25
52 depth hc eff mm 156
53 Eff area of conc in tension surrounding reinf Ac, eff mm² 609375
54 ρp eff 0.0548
55 fctm MPa 2.80
56 kt 0.50
57 (ϵsm-ϵcm) = 0.00058
58 0.6σsc/Ec 0.00045
59 k1 0.80
60 k2 0.50
61 min. clear cover mm 50
62 Sr. max 247.59
63 Wk = Sr, max (ϵsm-ϵcm) mm 0.144
64 Allowable crack width mm 0.30
UR 0.48
65 Status O.K.
Design of Pier Cap

217
Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pier Cap- Corbel at Ch. 121+255 17-12-2018
DESIGN OF PIER CAP
The Pier Cap is designed as a bracket. Details of maximum bearing reactions for various load
cases are given below.
Analysis and Design of Pier Cap -
Distance of point of action of load from support section, a = 0.247 m.

Depth of bracket at the outside edge S = 1.700
Overall Depth of Section, D = 1.700 m.
Effective Depth of Section, d = 1.586 m.
a/d = 0.16
As a/d < 1, the section is designed as a bracket/corbel.
Width of the effective section, b = 3 m.
Beta factor 1
Ultimate load on bearing for design of Corbel :
For designing the bracket, ultimate loads are considered and as the normal case is governing, this is
only presented.
Load Details Load Factor Ultimate Factored Load

in kN
Vertical Load -
Dead Load 540 1.35 729.00

SIDL- fixed 0 1.35 0.00
SIDL- wc 81 1.75 141.75
Live Load -
Max. Torsion Case 1300 1.50 1950.00 Load factor =1.0 in case of SV
Max. Reaction Case 1072 1.00 1072.00 50% I.F. = 0.00
Seismic 0 1.50 0.00
Total Maximum Vertical Load, Vu - 1943
(For. Max. Reaction Case) say 1943 kn.
Total Maximum Vertical Load, Vu - 2820.75

(For. Max. Torsion Case) say 572 kn.
Torsional Moment 1657.50 knm.
Transverse Horizontal Load , Hu 0 kn.

(Normal Case)
Minimum Horizontal Load , Hu = 0.2*Vu = 389 kn.
(For. Max. Reaction Case)
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Concrete Grade (Cube strength) fck 35 Mpa
Steel Grade fsy 500 Mpa
Strength reduction factor f 0.85
Friction Factor m 1.4
S/d = 1.072 OK
Hu Check for Nomimal Shear Strength, Vu/(bd')<0.15fc'

Vu Vu/(bd) = 510.39 kn./m2.
0.15fc' = 4200.00 kn./m2. OK
1700 As Vu/(bd) > 0.15fc' , dimensions assumed are ok.
Flexural Tension Reinforcement, Af =

(Vu*a+Hu(D-d))/0.85*fsy*d'
0 so, Af = 972 mm2.
a = 247
Design of Corbel
Vishal Siddhartha
Design of Pier Cap- Corbel at Ch. 121+255 17-12-2018
Shear Friction Reinforcement, Direct Tension Reinforcement,

Avf = Vu/(0.85*fsy*m) At = Hu/(0.85*fsy)
= 3933.89 mm2. = 914.2 mm2.
** fsy = 415 Mpa taken
Total Primary tensile Reinforcement, As= 2/3Avf+At or Af+At or (0.04fc'/fsy)*bd',

whichever is greater
2/3Avf+At 3537
Af+At 1886
As= 3537 mm2.

Provide T 20 mm 20 nos Spacing = 151 mm c/c
mm 20 nos
Provided RF = 6283 mm2. OK
Horizontal reinforcement (Closed stirrups), Ah = 0.5 Af or 0.333 Avf

whichever is greater
0.5 Af 486
0.333 Avf 1310
Provide T Ah = 1310 mm2. 1.057 m from top
Legs 2 12 mm 12 nos Spacing = 300 mm c/c
Provided RF = 2714 mm2. OK
Tor L in
Design of Corbel
DESIGN OF PILE CAP FOR PIER PILE CAP
218
DESIGN OF PILE CAP FOR PIER PILE CAP
219
DESIGN OF PILE CAP FOR PIER PILE CAP Document no.
the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Cap for Pier at Ch: 121+255 14-12-2018
Layout of Pile cap
220
Gradation to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West
Bengal on EPC mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal S.Chatterjee
ULS CONDITION

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-033 for Pier, ULS design summary)

Group I (Case-1) 1885.38 841.18 820.75
Group I (Case-2) 1835.46 523.12 953.12
Group I (Case-3) 1817.25 1293.87 789.90
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 1805.14 632.72 604.92
Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(-
V) 1522.88 3162.66 1590.20
Group III (Case-1B) Seismic
Transverse(+V) 1696.67 3162.66 1590.20
Group III (Case-2A) Seismic Transverse (-
V) 1516.83 3099.00 1602.08
(+V) 1689.41 3099.00 1602.08
V) 1514.87 3171.39 1569.78
Transverse(+V) 1686.51 3171.39 1569.78
LWL
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic Longitudinal(- CASE
V) 1525.96 1682.23 2578.32
Longitudinal(+V) 1693.58 1682.23 2578.32
V) 1519.31 1639.44 2596.79
Longitudinal(+V) 1686.93 1639.44 2596.79
V) 1516.88 1728.09 2569.63
Longitudinal(+V) 1684.50 1728.09 2569.63
Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 1320.11 1176.93 1038.37
Group V (Case-1B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 1899.43 1176.93 1038.37
Group V (Case-2A) Seismic Vertical(-V)

1315.48 1134.15 1056.84

Group I (Case-1) 2021.40 845.70 837.55
Group I (Case-2) 1971.48 527.64 969.92
Group I (Case-3) 1953.27 1298.39 806.71
Group II(Case-2) Wind Load 1902.89 481.90 828.57 HFL
CASE
V) 1623.74 3166.78 1606.66
Transverse(+V) 1797.53 3166.78 1606.66
V) 1617.69 3103.12 1618.54
221
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Group III (Case-2B) Seismic Transverse ULS CONDITION

(+V) 1790.27 3103.12 1618.54
V) 1615.73 3175.51 1586.24
Transverse(+V) 1787.37 3175.51 1586.24
V) 1626.83 1686.32 2596.50
Longitudinal(+V) 1794.45 1686.32 2596.50
V) 1620.17 1643.54 2614.97
Longitudinal(+V) 1787.79 1643.54 2614.97 HFL
Group IV (Case-3A) Seismic Longitudinal(- CASE
V) 1617.74 1732.19 2587.81
Longitudinal(+V) 1785.36 1732.19 2587.81
No. of piles = 6
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3
ZT 14.4 1.00E+22 14.4
ZL 10.8 10.8 10.8
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 TOTAL
Group I (Case-1)
446 388 329 1163
Group I (Case-2)
428 392 355 1175
Group I (Case-3)
463 374 284 1121
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load

398 354 310 1063

400 367 334 1102

435 356 277 1067 LWL
Group III (Case-1A) Seismic Transverse(- CASE
V) 616 398 180 1195
Transverse(+V) 645 427 209 1281
V) 612 398 185 1195
(+V) 640 427 213 1280
V) 614 395 176 1185
Transverse(+V) 642 423 205 1270
222
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Group IV (Case-1A) Seismic Longitudinal(- ULS CONDITION

V) 605 489 372 1466
Longitudinal(+V) 633 516 400 1549
V) 603 489 376 1468
Longitudinal(+V) 630 517 404 1551
V) 606 486 367 1459
Longitudinal(+V) 634 514 395 1542 LWL
CASE
395 314 232 941
Group V (Case-1B) Seismic Vertical(+V)

491 409 328 1228

393 315 236 944
Group V (Case-2B) Seismic Vertical(+V)

488 410 331 1229

396 312 227 936
Group V (Case-3B) Seismic Vertical(+V) 491 406 322 1219
Group I (Case-1) 471 412 353 1236
Group I (Case-2) 453 416 379 1248
Group I (Case-3) 488 398 308 1193
Group II(Case-1) Wind Load 423 379 334 1136

V) 635 417 198 1250
Transverse(+V) 664 445 227 1336
V) 631 417 203 1250
(+V) 659 445 231 1335
Group III (Case-3A) Seismic Transverse(- HFL
V) 632 413 194 1240 CASE
Transverse(+V) 661 442 223 1325
V) 624 507 391 1522
Longitudinal(+V) 652 535 418 1605
V) 622 508 394 1524
Longitudinal(+V) 649 536 422 1607
V) 625 505 385 1515
Longitudinal(+V) 652 533 413 1598
Group V (Case-1A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 414 332 250 996
Group V (Case-2A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 411 333 254 999
223
Vishal S.Chatterjee
ULS CONDITION
HFL
Group V (Case-3A) Seismic Vertical(-V) 415 330 245 991 CASE

LEVER ARM = 0.90 m
MOMENT = 1446.05 tm
Density of soil = 1.8 t/m3
Lever arm = 0.90 m
Shear check at face of pile
Maximum shear at face of pile = 1606.72 t

Net shear = 1519.52 t
av = 0.9 m
deff = 1.72 m
β = av/2d
= 0.26
Reduced shear = 398.71 t
Transverse direction:-
Since there is no bending in trasnverse direction so there will be minimum reinforcement in trasnverse direction
224

Vishal S.Chatterjee
SLS CONDITION

(Refer Design document- 4800197-GGN-DD-033 for Pier, SLS design summary)
Group I (Case-1 service-Rare)

1357.80 560.75 546.90
1324.52 348.70 635.15
1312.38 862.54 526.34
Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare)
1301.48 511.64 481.69
1276.52 313.31 531.15
1267.41 743.32 467.96
LWL CASE
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent)
Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent)

1456.94 565.27 563.71
1423.66 353.22 651.96
1411.52 867.06 543.15
1400.63 516.16 498.50
1375.67 317.83 547.96
1366.56 747.84 484.76
HFL CASE
Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 1209.29 0 0 LWL CASE

Group V (Case-1- Quasi permanent) 1308.44 0 0 HFL CASE
No. of piles = 6
SECTION MODULUS
PILE 1 2 3
ZT 14.4 1E+22 14.4
ZL 10.8 10.8 10.8
LOAD CASE 1 2 3 TOTAL

Group I (Case-1 service-Rare) 316 277 238 831
LWL
CASE
Group II (Case-1 wind load-Rare) 297 262 226 785
225

Vishal S.Chatterjee
Design of Pile Cap for Pier at Ch: 121+255 LWL 14-12-2018
CASE
Group II (Case-2 wind load-Rare) 284 SLS

262CONDITION
240 786
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 0 0 0 0
LWL
Group III (Case-3 Service-Frequent) 0 0 0 0 CASE
Group IV (Case 1 Wind Load-Frequent) 0 0 0 0
Group II (Case-3 wind load-Rare) 325 273 221 818 HFL
Group III (Case-1 Service-Frequent) 0 0 0 0 CASE

LEVER ARM = 0.90 m
MOMENT = 803.64 tm
3
Density of concrete = 2.50 t/m
3
Density of soil = 1.8 t/m
Downward Weight due to pile cap and cushion = 64.60 t
Lever arm = 0.90 m
CRACK WIDTH
V = 1308 t
Max Load on a Pile= 218 t
Lever arm = 0.90 m
Moment due to S.W. & Cushion = 58 tm
Net B.M = 531 t-m
226
ULS CHECK
227
Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-016

Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning
of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
Vishal S.Chatterjee
beff for cantiliver slab = 1.2a+b1

a = 0.9 m
b1 = 1.2 m
beff = 2.28 m
Hence it overlaps =
beff modified = 2.04 m
Max. Shear = 663.65 t
Load/m = 325.32 t/m
ULS Moment = 292.79 tm/m
Concrete grade M35

Steel Grade Fe550

Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination fck 0.48
N/mm² 16.80
N/mm² 330.00
STRENGTH CHECK
Sl No. Parameters Units Pile cap
1 MOMENT KN-M 2872

MATERIAL DATA
10 α 0.67
Design value for Concrete comp. strength (fcd =
12 Mpa 15.63
αfck/Уm)
Geometric Data
22 Hence Pt= (100*Ast/bd) % 0.29
23 Dia of Shear Reinforcement links mm 10
24 Spacing of reinforcement in other direction mm 280
25 number of legs Nos. 5 (links per meter)
26 Reinforcement(% )
Design of Pier Cap
228

28 Status O.K.
30 Status O.K.
Strength of section
33 λ 0.80
34 η 1.00
43 Status O.K.
Shear Resistance
57 0.5d = mm 839
58 2d = mm 3355
59 αv = m 0.900
60 β= 0.262
62 K = 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.345
63 σcp MPa 0.000
64 ρ1=At/(bd)<=0.02 0.003
65 Vmin = 0.031*k^(3/2).fck^(1/2) KN 0.286
KN 542
67 [0.12.K(80p1fck)^0.33+(0.15σcp)]bwd
KN 480
73 Cotθ 1.00
74 Required area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 325
75 Nos 5
76 Provided area of Shear reinforcement (Aws) mm²/mm 393
78 αcw 1.00
79 V1 0.53
83 Status O.K.
As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011, Minimum Shear Reinforcement.
84 Min. Shear Reinforcement Asw min/s mm²/mm 0.6583

87 Area of reinforcement Asw/s provided mm² 1.40
88 Status O.K.
44 Effective As long for only Bending mm² 3748

45 DFtd KN 418.69
46 As long for additional tensile RF from Shear force mm² 875
47 UR for combined shear + bending 0.94
48 Status O.K.
49 Max. strain on concrete in comp. 0.0035
50 Max. strain on reinf. in tension 0.0044
51 Max. depth of NA From Comp. Flange mm 744
52 Status (under/Reinf, Over Reinf or Bal) U/R
53 fctm MPa 2.80
54 Min. reinforcement mm² 2220
55 Status O.K.
*Surface Reinforcement (Cl. 16.5.4 (4)-IRC:112-2011)

Dia of Reinforcement (φ) in long. Direction mm 12
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or in longitiudinal dir. mm 200
Reinforcement Provided in long. Direction mm2/m 565
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) in trans. Direction mm 12
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or in Trans dir. mm 140
Reinforcement Provided in Trans. Direction mm2/m 808
Status O.K
Secondary Reinforcement
Min Reinf As min=0.26 fctm/fyk bt d or 0.0013bt d mm2 11990
Dia of Reinforcement (φ) mm 20
Spacing of Reinforcement (s) or mm 140
Reinforcement Provided mm2 12111
Status O.K
Design of Pier Cap
229
PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK
230
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of 4800197-GGN-DD-
Job No 4800197
033
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari
Design of Pile Cap for Pier at Ch: 121+255
DESIGN FOR PUNCHING SHEAR IN PILE CAP AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
3
Density of concrete 25 KN/m
3
Density of soil 18 KN/m
Characteristic Strength, fck 35 Mpa
Design Strength of concrete, fcd 15.63 Mpa
Net Applied Force, Ved 6328 KN
Net downward force within the control perimeter, DVEd 287.2 KN
Overall depth of pile cap 1800 mm
Effective Depth of Pile Cap, d 1697.0 mm
Reinforcement Ratio, rl 0.0012
Distance between the edge of pile to the edge of pier 0.559 < 2d
VEd,red = VEd - DVEd 6040.52 KN
n = 0.6 x [1-fck/310] 0.532
Maximum Punching Shear Resistance , nRd.max = 0.5 x n x fcd 4.16 Mpa
0.5
K = 1 + (200/d) 1.34 ≤2
1.5 0.5
nmin = 0.031 x K x (fck) 0.286 Mpa
Distance of control perimeter from column periphery, a 0.6 mm
2xd/a 6071.56
Perimeter along control line, p 3616.00 mm
2
Area enclosed by control line 3.94 m
nEd,red = VEd,red /(bd) 0.984 MPa
nmin x 2d/a 1733.626 MPa
0.333
nRd = 0.12 x K x (80.r1.fck) x (2d/a) 1733.626 MPa
HENCE, OK
231
SLS CHECK
232
4800197-GGN-DD-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation Job No 4800197 033
to Four Laning of NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854 (Package-2-
A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section in the State of West Bengal on EPC
mode Designed by: Checked by: Date
Vishal S.Chatterjee
DESIGN OF foundation (SLS)
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 7313
Material Data
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) 500
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67
Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd=
11 αfck/γm) Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63
Geometric Data
Stress Check
27 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112MPa 12800
29 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 300
30 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112MPa 16.80
2
33 MOA of Tension area mm 5.08E+08
2
34 Diff. mm 0
4
35 MOI of cracked section mm 8.14E+11
36 Stress in tension reinf. MPa 193.626
UR 0.65
37 Status O.K.
UR 0.18
39 Status O.K.
233
4800197-GGN-
Vishal S.Chatterjee
CRACK WIDTH CHECK
Load Data
1 Moment KN-m 5206
Material Data
3 Charecterstic strength of reinforcement (fyk) Table 18.1,IRC 112 MPa 500
9 α Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 0.67
11 Design value for concrete compressive strength (fcd= αfck/γm)
Cl 6.4.2.8,IRC 112 MPa 15.63
Geometric Data
Stress Check
25 Age at Loading days 28
26 Relative humidity Table 6.9 , IRC %
112 12800
28 Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Eeff) Cl 6.4.2.5,IRC 112
MPa 1924.8
30 Allowable stress in Steel Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 400.0
31 Allowable stress in Concrete Cl 12.2.2,IRC 112
MPa 12.60
34 MOA of Tension area mm2 2.41E+09
35 Diff. mm2 0.000
36 MOI of cracked section mm4 3.54E+12
234
4800197-GGN-
Vishal S.Chatterjee
37 Stress in tension reinf. ssc MPa 150.180

38 Status O.K.
40 Status O.K.
CALCULATION FOR CRACK WIDTH FOR BENDING As per 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011
41 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)
42 ae = Es/Ecm 6.25
43 depth hc,eff mm 212.5
44 Eff area of conc in tension surrounding reinf Ac,eff mm2 1912500
45 Rr,eff 0.0123
46 fctm Mpa 2.800
47 fct,eff Mpa 2.800
48 kt 1.500
49 (esm-ecm)= {ssc - kt(fct,eff/Rr,eff)(1+aeRr,eff)}/Es -0.0011
50 0.6*ssc/Ec 0.0005
51 (esm-ecm) 0.0005
52 K1 0.80
53 K2 0.50
54 Minimum clear cover c 75.00
55 Srmax = 3.4c+0.425k1k2f/Rreff 531
56 Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm) 0.239
57 Allowable crack width 0.300
58 UR 0.80
59 Status O.K.
235

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Design of Seismic Stopper 17-12-2018
DESIGN OF SEISMIC REACTION BLOCK (AT ABUTMENT LOCATION)

for Longitudinal Direction
superstructure Reaction block
portion
Dirn. Of Seismic force
a b
substructure
hc
REACTION BLOCK - CORBEL DESIGN (as per Raina)
Grade of concrete M 45 Mpa

Grade of steel Fe 500 Mpa
m 1.4
DL of SuperStructure = 558.9 Tons

Total wt of SIDL = 130 Tons
Live load = 0 Tons 0 FOR LONG DIRN.
Total wt of superstructure= 688.9 Tons
Seismic Coeff
Zone 5
Z factor 0.36
R factor 3 for reaction blocks as per cl 219.5.5 Table 9 of IRC:6-2014
(for blocks designed as primary resisting members )
Importance 1.2 for Bridge
Sa/g = 2.5
ah = 0.18
Hence, Seismic force = 0.18 X 688.9 Ton = 124.0 Tons
Force to be resisted by each reaction block = 24.8 Tons for 5.0 blocks
Factored load for seismic 1.5 times = 1.5 37.2 Tons
Height of the Reaction Block 1000 mm
Width of the reaction Block (dirn perpendicular to seismic dirn) b 850 mm
Depth of the reaction Block (dirn parallel to seismic dirn) h 850 mm including dirtwall
face to cg of load ac 850 mm

thickness of corbel at face hc 850 mm
effective depth of corbel d' 778 mm
d 622 (0.8d')
width of corbel b 850 mm
Ultimate Shear force (seismic) Vu 37 T with factor of 1.5 for seismic
Hor force perpendicular to Vu Hu 7.44 T >=0.2Vu
Conc. shear capacity (10bd) Vc 52.9 T
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 1.000
ac/d' <= 1 1.093 design as beam
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 5.4 0.70 safe
236

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Avf = Vu = 625 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 175 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 1216 mm2

0.85*fsy*d
As >=(Af+At) 1391 As final 1905 mm2

(tensile) >=(.667*Avf+At) 592
>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 1905
provide 25 dia bars As provided 2944 mm2 OK
Nos 6 spacing 149 mm
length of embedment 1300 mm
upto 52*bar dia
Fed 37 ton > Vrd,c 52.9 ton Vert Stirrups Not reqd
Av (vert stirrrup) >= 0.5*F Ed /(fyd) = 428 mm2
Provide 4 Legged 16 mm dia 2 Set vertically

Upto face of piercap
Av prov 1608 mm2 OK
850 As = 25 mm dia 6 Nos. @ 149 mm c/c

(with Ld= 1300 mm)
Ah = 12 mm dia 4 legged 2 layer
Dirn. Of Seismic force Av 4L 16 mm 2 Set vertically

1000
Pier/ Abt Cap
**Includes dirtwall 850

Ld = 1300 mm and bent As to as close hook
For both As & Ah
237

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
DESIGN OF SEISMIC REACTION BLOCK (AT PIER LOCATION)

portion
a b
substructure
hc

m 1.4

Live load = 0 Tons 0 FOR LONG DIRN.
Seismic Coeff
Zone 5
Z factor 0.36
Sa/g = 2.5
ah = 0.18
Depth of the reaction Block (dirn parallel to seismic dirn) h 1000 mm

d 742 (0.8d')
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 0.850
ac/d' <= 1 0.916 design as corbel
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 5.4 0.59 safe
238

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Avf = Vu = 625 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 175 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 1019 mm2

0.85*fsy*d

>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 2272
upto 52*bar dia Provide As for full width as seismic can be from both side
Fed 37 ton > Vrd,c 63.1 ton Vert Stirrups Not reqd

Av prov 1608 mm2 OK
850 As = 25 mm dia 7 Nos. @ 124 mm c/c

(with Ld= 1300 mm)

1000
Pier/ Abt Cap
**Long Direction 1000

For both As & Ah
239
Detailed Engineering in Connection with

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Rehabilitation and Up-Gradation to Four Laning of
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
(Package-2-A) of Ghoshpukur-Salsalabari section Designed by: Checked by: Date
in the State of West Bengal on EPC mode Vishal Siddhartha
DESIGN OF SEISMIC REACTION BLOCK

for Transverse Direction
portion
a b
substructure
h

m 1.4

Live load = 33.4 Tons (180.5*20%)
Seismic Coeff
Zone 5
Z factor 0.36
Sa/g = 2.5
ah = 0.18
face to cg of load a 742 mm

thickness of corbel at face h 1400 mm
d 1062 (0.8d')
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 0.530
a/d' <= 1 0.559 design as corbel
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 5.4 1.02 safe
240

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
Avf = Vu = 1639 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 459 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 1634 mm2

0.85*fsy*d

>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 3442
upto 52*bar dia
Fed 98 ton > Vrd,c 95.6 ton Vert Stirrups reqd


Av prov 1356 mm2 OK
900 As = 25 mm dia 8 Nos. @ 114 mm c/c

(with Ld= 1300 mm)

842
1400 ** in transverse direction

For both As & Ah
241

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Pedestal at Pin Bearing _Long Direction 17-12-2018
PDESTAL AT PIN BEARING (LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION)

portion
a b
substructure
hc

m 1.4


d 886 (0.8d')
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 0.500
ac/d' <= 1 0.542 design as corbel
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 5.4 2.63 safe
242

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
Pedestal at Pin Bearing _Long Direction 17-12-2018
Avf = Vu = 4706 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 1318 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 4596 mm2

0.85*fsy*d

>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 3829
upto 52*bar dia

Av prov 4019 mm2 OK
1200 As = 25 mm dia 14 Nos. @ 84 mm c/c

(with Ld= 1300 mm)

600
Pier/ Abt Cap
**Includes dirtwall 1200

For both As & Ah
243

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
Pedestal at Pin Bearing _Trans Direction 17-12-2018
PDESTAL AT PIN BEARING (TRANSVERSE DIRECTION)

for Transverse Direction
portion
a b
substructure
h

m 1.4

face to cg of load a 600 mm

thickness of corbel at face h 1200 mm
d 886 (0.8d')
Checks
ac/hc >= > 0.5 & < 1.0 0.500
a/d' <= 1 0.542 design as corbel
Vu/bd <= 0.15fc = 5.4 1.41 safe
244

Job No 4800197 4800197-GGN-DD-033
NH-31D from Km. 113+200 to km. 154+854
Pedestal at Pin Bearing _Trans Direction 17-12-2018
Avf = Vu = 2521 mm2

0.85*fsy*m
At = Hu 706 mm2
.85*fy
Af = Vu*a+Hu*(h-d') 2462 mm2

0.85*fsy*d

>=(.04*f'c/fsy)*bd' 3829
upto 52*bar dia

Av prov 4019 mm2 OK
1200 As = 25 mm dia 9 Nos. @ 137 mm c/c

(with Ld= 1300 mm)

600
1200 ** in transverse direction

For both As & Ah
245
DESIGN OF TEST PILES
246
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Detailed Engineering in Connection with Rehabilitation and Job No 4800197 DD-033
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Design of Test Piles for MNB at Ch. 121+255 17-12-2018
INITIAL LATERAL LOAD TEST PILES
WORKING LATERAL LOAD (SAFE LOAD) ON FREE HEADED PILES
For piles, H = 29 t (SLS)
Dia of Pile 1.2 m

Grade of Concrete = M35
E= 32000 MPa -> 32000 MN/m2
I= 0.1018 m^4
ηh = 4900 kN/m3 (Input from GT report)
T= 3.669
L1 = 3.7 m
L1/T 1.01
Lf/T = 2.02 (From Fig (4), IS: 2911(Part-1/Sec 2) -2010 - Fixed head pile)
Lf = 7.4 m
Deflection of pile group at pile top level for fixed head condition
Deflection, y = 10.18 mm
Deflection at pile top level for free head condition
L1 = 3.7 m
L1/T 1.01
Lf/T = 1.85 (From Fig (4), IS: 2911(Part-1/Sec 2) -2010 - Free head pile)
Lf = 6.79 m
Consider the pile group deflection,
y= 10.18 mm
Lateral load required to produce 10.18 mm deflection

H= 9 t
Deflection check at Scour level = 6.59 mm OK
TEST LOAD (ULTIMATE LOAD) ON FREE HEADED PILES
For piles, Hu = 2.5 x 9 = 22.5 t.
CHECK FOR ADEQUACY OF REINFORCEMENT IN PILES DURING LATERAL LOAD TEST
For the test pile, the pile section is checked for adequacy of the section under following load cases:
1) Safe Load
2) Ultimate Load
Under safe load case, the pile section is designed as per Servicibility limit state - stress theory with
permissible stresses conforming to IRC code. Under ultimate load case, the section is checked under
Ultimate limit state theory as per IRC. Following loads have been considered for the checking of pile
247
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Vishal S.Chatterjee
sections under various load combinations:
CHECK FOR STRESSES IN PILE SECTION DURING TEST
MAXIMUM MOMENT IN PILE:
Mmax = m * Mf
= m * Q * (L1 + Lf) {Refer Appendix C, IS:2911 (Part 1/ Sec2) - 2010}
m = Reduction Factor = 0.48
Where:
LOAD CASE
CASE 1: CHECK UNDER SAFE LOAD
Q= 9 t
Mmax = 0.48 x 9 x 10.487369376473445
= T-m
CASE 2: CHECK UNDER ULTIMATE LOAD
Q= 22.5 t
Mmax = 0.48 x 22.5 x 10.4873693764734
113.264 T-m
=
REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED IN TEST PILE
It is proposed to provide following reinforcement (Grade Fe500 having minimum elongation of 14.5% &
conforming to IS: 1786) in the test pile:
For Piles under abutment location:

22 nos. of 20 mm dia
0 nos. of 0 mm dia (for top 9m only)
Total Pt = 0.61 %
STRESSES IN PILE SECTION UNDER SAFE LOAD (P=0, Mmax = 45.3054357063649 t-m)
a) LATERALLY LOADED PILE
Design is based on Servicibilty limit state - stress theory in conformity with IRC code. Stresses
in the pile section have been checked using an in-house software(FAGUS) and the results are shown below:
248
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Vishal S.Chatterjee
Results:
2 2
Stress in concrete = 2.4 N/mm < 16.8 N/mm Hence OK
2 2
Stress in steel = 30 N/mm < 300 N/mm Hence OK
STRESSES IN PILE SECTION UNDER ULTIMATE LOAD (i,e TEST LOAD)
Design is based on Ultimate limit state method in conformity with IRC code. Capacity of the pile
section has been checked using the FAGUS software and the results are as shown below :
a) For Laterally loaded pile
Pu = 0 N
Mu = 113.264 t-m
fck = 35 Mpa
D= 1200 mm (Dia of pile)
d' = 99 mm (Eff. Cover to reinforcement)
% reinf provided = 0.61 %
249
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Vishal S.Chatterjee
REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
250
Document
LOUIS BERGER no.
4800197-GGN-
Vishal S.Chatterjee
PIER PILES
REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED IN TEST PILE
It is proposed to provide following reinforcement (Grade Fe500 having minimum elongation of 14.5% &
conforming to IS: 1786) in the test pile:
For Piles under pier location:

nos. of24 16 mm dia (i.e. min of 0.4%)
nos. of 0 25 mm dia
Total Pt = 0.43 %
INITIAL VERTICAL LOAD TEST ON PILES
WORKING VERTICAL LOAD (SAFE LOAD) ON FREE HEADED PILES
For piles, V = 397 t (SLS)
TEST LOAD (ULTIMATE LOAD) ON FREE HEADED PILES
For piles, Vu = 2.5 x 397 = 992.5 t.
FOR VERTICALLY LOADED PILES
Same test pile as used in lateral load test shall be used. Hence, reinforcement proposed is Pt =0.43%
Under vertical load compression in concrete governs
We consider the Ultimate load on pile
Vu = 993 t
2
A= 1.1310 m (for 1200mm dia pile section)
2 2
c = Vu/A = 877.56 t/m < 1680 t/m for M35.
Hence OK
251

GGN DD 033 - D0 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GGN DD 033 - D0 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 121+255 1

DETAILED ENGINEERING IN CONNECTION WITH REHABILITATION AND

CLIENT: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI)

CONTRACTOR: SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

DESIGN REPORT – MAJOR BRIDGE 121+255

Document Title Design Report – Major Bridge 121+255

Design of Substructure & D. Ray

1.2 Geometric description

Abutment(Fx) for Bridge at chainage 121+255

Following components of substructure and foundation are designed

2. Codes and Specifications

Sl.No. Code Year of Publication

2 IRC : 112 2011

4. Load Combinations for Limit State

A Ultimate Limit State (For verification of Equilibrium)

B Ultimate Limit State (For verification of structural strength)

C Serviceability Limit State

D Combination for Design of Foundation

Accidental combination is not considered for abutment

i. Base Pressure Check

ii. Design of Abutment shaft

iii. Design of Footing

iv. Design of Abutment Cap

vi. Design of Dirt Wall

vii. Design of End Return Wall

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

1 Basic Design Data

1.3 Material Data

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

1.4 Typical Levels

1.5 Soil Parameters

1.6 Abutment Dimensions (Square)

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

no. of piles 10 Yes

Pile cap in Long direction 4.76 m 0.88

Depth of pile cap 1.80 m 1.5 times of pile dia 3.6

orthgonal axis for pile co-ordinate in skew 3.972161

Dimension input format for skew abutment

6.650 HFL 59.350m

0.80 FTL 59.000m

1.80 1.80 FL 57.200m

1.98 1.98 MSL 56.040m

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

Dead Load 1.05 0.95 1.05 1.0

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

Ultimate Limit State (For

Live load and associated loads 1.5 0 1 0

Seismic Effect (During service) - 1.5 1.0 -

- 0.75 0.6 0.5

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

Combination for Design of Foundation (Table 3.4, Annex B, IRC:6-2017)

SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35 1 1

SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1 1.75 1.2 1.2

Live load and associated loads 1.5 1.3 0.2 0 1

Buoyancy (Base Pressure) 1 1 1 -

Buoyancy (Structural Design) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Earth Pressure 1.5 1.3 1 1 1

Seismic Effect (During service) - - 1.5 0 0

1.8 Load Data

Wearing course 0.22 t/m2

Design of aAutment A1 (Fix) - MNB at Ch:121+255 Vishal S.Chatterjee 14-12-2018

1.9 Bearing Data

1.10 Clear Cover