Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Cheltsrom
6 May 2018
Final Self
Being autonomous is being able to think on your own, its having your own thoughts and
being strong minded, and not allowing yourself to gravitate towards others process of thinking.
Kant’s reasoning to be an autonomous individual is to due to their subjectivity and how well you
stand alone. Thinking for yourself without any compulsion is not always attainable when you
grow up with outside people working to change your mind on any given thing. As you grow up,
you are restricted to think and be a certain way because of how your parents enforce you. Your
upbringing is where your identity comes from, you are made up by pother people and their
personalities, their upbringing is also a reflection on you. Two identities may not always link up,
but they help each other in building ideas and forming personal thoughts on a given subject.
Growing up, you don’t always have a voice, your parents were your voice. You were told what
you liked, who to hang out with and without question you abided by them because there was no
other alternative. The external constraint that others have on oneself is their identity. Gaining an
identity, creating your own is how you self-advocate, it is making your own person but while still
maintaining some attributes of others identities. Many people don’t put into perspective that
other people, are what make yourself, people are the key to identifying each other. These
external constraints are what put pressure on people and cause one to not be autonomous due to
outside facts. We can adjust our understanding of what it means to be autonomous by shifting
how we think about things rationally. Being rational is how we think of ourselves, no one thinks
to call themselves irrational or have that kind of thought process. Kant dismisses any argument
that is thrown against him with reason of how we must have the capability to think for ourselves
and rely on our own mind to refer us back to how we must accept what is given at hand.
Linda Alcoff states “First, there is a growing recognition that where one speaks from
affects the meaning and truth of what one says, and thus that one cannot assume an ability to
transcend one's location.” (Alcoff 7) The problem of speaking for others is not only taking away
their voice, but its giving off a wrong impression that there is no establishment of authority and if
one does not have the same superiority as the initial speech giver, it could be taking as a joke and
decrease the significance of how one develops a bias for how the given speech will be. There are
sometimes when it is essential to speak for others, as said in class, when a person is in a state of
vegetation. This person is no longer cognizant of their actions and they are not in any way, able
to articulate or formulate what they want to be done. Life support is a very controversial topic,
some think that it is just lingering on the inevitable and others believe that there is hope to be
seen in cases like this one. There are however, only certain circumstances where this is allowed.
Speaking for others becomes a problem when your intentions are not pure, this inhibits
Bibliography