Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT:
Distributed generation inverters are generally operated in parallel with P-f/Q-V and P-V/Q-f
droop control strategies. Due to mismatched resistive and inductive line impedance, power
sharing and output voltage of the parallel DG inverters deviate from the reference value. This
leads to instability in the microgrid system. Adding virtual resistors and virtual inductors in the
control loop of droop controllers improve the power sharing and stability of operation. But, this
leads to voltage drop. Therefore, an improved P-f/Q-V and P-V/Q-f droop control is proposed.
Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed control and the selection of parameters enhance
the output voltage of inverters.
KEYWORDS:
1. Distributed generation inverters
2. Droop control
3. Microgrid
4. Output impedance
5. Virtual resistors
6. Virtual inductors
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS:
Fig. 2. Parallel inverter output voltage using P-V/Q-f droop control with virtual resistor under resistive line
impedance.
Fig. 3. Active power sharing using secondary control with virtual resistor under resistive line impedance.
Fig. 4. Reactive power sharing using secondary control with virtual resistor under resistive line impedance.
Fig. 5. Parallel inverter output frequency using secondary control with virtual resistor under resistive line
impedance.
Fig. 6. Parallel inverter output voltage using secondary control with virtual resistor under resistive line impedance.
Fig. 7. Active power sharing using P-V/Q-f droop control under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 8. Reactive power sharing using P-V/Q-f droop control under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 9. Active power sharing using P-f/Q-V droop control with virtual inductor under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 10. Reactive power sharing using P-f/Q-V droop control with virtual inductor under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 11. Parallel inverter output frequency using P-f/Q-V droop control with virtual inductor under inductive line
impedance.
Fig. 12. Parallel inverter output voltage using P-f/Q-V droop control with virtual inductor under inductive line
impedance.
Fig. 13. Active power sharing using secondary control with virtual inductor under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 14. Reactive power sharing using secondary control with virtual inductor under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 15. Parallel inverter output frequency using secondary control with virtual inductor under inductive line
impedance.
Fig. 16. Parallel inverter output voltage using secondary control with virtual inductor under inductive line
impedance.
Fig. 17. Active power sharing using secondary control with different DG ratings under resistive line impedance.
Fig. 18. Reactive power sharing using secondary control with different DG ratings under resistive line impedance.
Fig. 19. Parallel inverter output frequency using secondary control with different DG ratings under resistive line
impedance.
Fig. 20. Parallel inverter output voltage using secondary control with different DG ratings under resistive line
impedance.
Fig. 21. Active power sharing using secondary control with different DG ratings under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 22. Reactive power sharing using secondary control with different DG ratings under inductive line impedance.
Fig. 23. Parallel inverter output frequency using secondary control with different DG ratings under inductive line
impedance.
Fig. 24. Parallel inverter output voltage using secondary control with different DG ratings under inductive line
impedance.
CONCLUSION:
In this paper, analysis of improved P-f/Q-V and P-V/Q-f droop control with secondary control
for DG parallel inverters in microgrid is proposed considering line and output impedance.
Proportional integral controller is adopted to ensure accurate tracking of the output voltage of the
inverter to the reference value and the influence of the controller parameters on the voltage
closed loop transfer function and the equivalent output impedance of the inverter is analyzed. In
order to match the total output impedance of the inverter and line impedance in parallel, the P-
V/Q-f and P-f/Q-V droop control strategy based on the inductive and resistive virtual impedance
is adopted to improve the total output impedance of the inverter through the virtual impedance.
The proposed P-f/Q-V and P-V/Q-f droop control, adaptively compensates the virtual resistor
and inductor voltage drop to improve output voltage amplitude accuracy to the reference value.
Simulation results show the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed improved control
method.
REFERENCES:
Brabandere, K. D., Bolsens, B., & Van, J. (2007). A voltage and frequency droop control method
for parallel inverters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 22(4), 1107–1115.
Chandorkar, M. C., Divan, D. M., & Adapa, R. (1993). Control of parallel connected inverters in
standalone ac supply systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 29(1), 136–143.
Chengshan, W., Zhaoxia, X., & Shouxiang, W. (2009). Multiple feedback loop control scheme
for inverters of the microsource in microgrids. Transactions of China Electro Technical Society,
24(2), 100–107 [in Chinese].
Chengshan, W., Zhangang, Y., Shouxiang, W., & Yanbo, C. (2010). Analysis of structural
characteristics and control approaches of experimental microgrid systems. Automation of
Electric Power Systems, 34(1), 99–105 [in Chinese].
Chowdhury, A. A. S., & Agarwal, K. (2003). Dono Koval Reliability modeling of distributed
generation in conventional distribution systems planning and analysis. IEEE Transactions on
Industry Applications, 39(5), 1493–1498.