LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

Mittal School of Business

Academic Task 1
Case Study

Name of the faculty member: Tanya Nagpal

Course Code: HRM 506 Course Title: HR Analytics

Class: MBA Section: Q2E51

Batch: 2018-2020 Max. Marks: 30

Date of Allotment: 29.01.2020 Date of Submission of Write up: 23.03.2020

S. No Objectives Topic Details Evaluation Expected outcomes

of Academic Parameters
Activity

1 Students - Group of Students will be Marks -This academic task

would be given a case study. Distribution: focuses on the
able to relate - Analysis of case will be following:
the done by group of students - Written
1. Help the students
theoretical and required to submit a Report-10
HR analytics written report. Marks apply the theoretical
concepts and - This will be followed by (followed by HR Analytics
tools with a class presentation. peer rating). concepts and tools
their practical - Presentations will start as - -Presentation- to real life situations
significance per the schedule uploaded 20 marks 2. Make them
in by concerned faculty understand the
corporate member
issues given in the
world
- Marks obtained respective cases and
will be decided as suggest solution/s.
per the appropriate 3. Good analytical
proportion and real life
problems
understanding will
be developed.
 RUBRICS FOR CASE WRITE UP

Criteria Exceeds the Fully Meets Minimally Doesn’t Meet Rating

Standards the Standards Meets the the Standards

Standards

Ability to Has a very Properly Although Missed all of

clearly Clear identifies the various aspects the important

identify understanding various aspects of problem are aspects of the

the case of the problem of the problem Identified, but problem and is

challenges and is able to and is able to the description unable to 4

incorporate clearly point fails to clearly clearly

his/her out the nature define the case identify the

knowledge/ of the Case challenges. problem.

insights in challenges

addressing the

Case
 Challenges

4 points 3 points 2 points No point

Ability to Suggestions Suggestions Suggestions Inappropriate

propose Were were Were suggestions

suggestions sufficiently adequately confusing, and does not

that can be specific, clear, identified and incomplete or align with the 3

implemented And described. lacked case problem.

appropriate relevance to

given the case the case

problem. problem

3 points 2 points 1 points No points

Ability to Able to clearly Shows the Shows Show no

apply relate the clear minimal understanding

different problem to understanding understanding of

various HR
HR analytics analytics concepts
concepts and of various of various HR analytics

in Shows HR analytics HR analytics concepts and

addressing Evidence concepts and is concepts and is unable to 3

the of depth and able to clearly inappropriately relate the

issue at breadth of relate the related to the problem to

hand. Applying challenge to various various

Related various management management

Knowledge to management Styles styles.

the issue. styles

3 points 2 points 1 points No points

TOTAL 10
 RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION

Criteria Exceeds Fully Minimally Meets Doesn’t Meet Max

Standards Meets Standards Standards Points
Standards

Content Shows full Shows good Shows somewhat Does not seem 8
understanding understanding of understanding of to understand
of the topic the topic the topic. the topic.
8 points 6 points 4 points No Points
Delivery Very clear and Clear flow of Most ideas flow but Difficult to 6
and concise flow of ideas. Shows focus is lost a follow the flow
Enthusiasm ideas. Shows interest in the times. Limited of ideas. Lack
high interest in topic. interest in the topic of enthusiasm
the topic. 4points 2 points and interest.
6 points No points
Q/A Excellent Good discussion Questions/discussion Limited or no 6
Discussion discussion of Of main points addressed surface attempt to engage
Key points. Good responses features of the class in learning.
Excellent to questions topic. Satisfactory Limited response
responses to 4 points responses to to questions
questions questions No points
6 points 2 points
Total 20

STUDENT GROUPS FOR THE CASE STUDY ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION

Reg. No. Name Roll No. Group No.

11812591 Anamika Doon Roll # RQ2E51A02 Group : 1
11813566 Abhinav Roll # RQ2E51A11
11813657 Aditi Khatri Roll # RQ2E51A12
11813697 Mohd Asif Wani Roll # RQ2E51A13
11813759 Jyotirekha Mohanty Roll # RQ2E51A14
11813776 Kanika Vig Roll # RQ2E51A15
11814470 Rao M Pavankumar M Roll # RQ2E51A17
Group : 2
Venkateshwar
11814523 Kanwaljeet Singh Roll # RQ2E51A18
11814936 Guncha Dutta Roll # RQ2E51A20
11814962 Priyanka Bhardwaj Roll # RQ2E51A21
11814963 Gurpreet Kaur Roll # RQ2E51A22
11815202 Rohullah Afshin Roll # RQ2E51A23 Group : 3
11815292 Nakul Kapoor Roll # RQ2E51A24
11815347 Sukhchain Singh Roll # RQ2E51A26
11815489 Antra Andotra Roll # RQ2E51A27
11815574 Shubham Choudhary Roll # RQ2E51A28
11815867 Mounika Kuricheti Roll # RQ2E51A29 Group : 4
11813177 Priyansha Raj Roll # RQ2E51A30
11814622 Mahima Saini Roll # RQ2E51A33