Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/320573208
CITATIONS READS
0 1,869
3 authors:
Anise M. S. Wu
University of Macau
108 PUBLICATIONS 1,671 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Francis Cheung on 30 January 2019.
Abstract
The relationship between employees’ perceptions of their supervisor’s leadership styles and their self-
rated successful aging in the workplace (i.e., adaptability and health, positive relationship, occupational
growth, personal security, continued focus, and achievement of goals) was examined in this study. A
total of 350 Chinese aging workers in Hong Kong (average age in years was 51.9, SD ¼ 5.2) were
recruited. In line with our hypothesis, regression result showed that perceived transformational
leadership was positively related to all successful aging in the workplace dimensions. Perceived
transactional leadership was significantly related to occupational growth. Finally, perceived laissez-faire
leadership was negatively related to all successful aging in the workplace dimensions. Implications and
recommendation for organizations, including strategies to facilitate successful aging in the workplace,
were discussed.
Keywords
leadership styles, successful aging
Working population in Hong Kong is rapidly aging. Based on the population projection by the Hong
Kong government, workers aged 40 years or above were 57% in 2013; it will be over 62% by 2041
(Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 2013). Numerous stud-
ies demonstrate that aging workers are different from their younger counterparts in terms of their
needs, work motives, expectations, and challenges (Kanfer & Ackerman, 2004). It is thus important
to identify factors that can support these individuals to continue to thrive or facilitate positive aging
in work–life balance (Robson, Hansson, Abalos, & Booth, 2006). The importance of leadership on
aging workers’ career development and organizational behaviors is frequently studied (e.g., Loretto
& White, 2006; Van Vianen, Dalhoeven, & de Pater, 2011). However, the role of employees’ percep-
tion of their supervisor’s leadership style on successful aging in the workplace has not been explored.
1
Department of Applied Psychology, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2
Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
3
Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao
Corresponding Author:
Francis Cheung, Department of Applied Psychology, Lingnan University, 2/F Dorothy Wong Building, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.
Email: francischeung@ln.edu.hk
2 Journal of Career Development XX(X)
In this study, we will examine how employees’ perception of their supervisor’s leadership styles,
including transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership, relate to successful aging in the
workplace among Hong Kong Chinese workers.
surprising because the role of leadership is important in the organizational behaviors of aging workers.
For example, in a longitudinal study conducted in Finland, Ilmarinen and Tempel found that the only
factor that could help older workers to maintain and enhance their work ability was the leaders’ beha-
viors toward the older workers’ need. Besides, leaders’ attitude toward age and aging is crucial in the
aging process of older workers. Van Vianen, Dalhoeven, and de Pater (2011) reported that supervisors’
beliefs about the learning avoidance orientation of older employees are significantly related to the
training and development willingness of older workers. The attitudes of supervisors also significantly
influence the intention to train older workers (Loretto & White, 2006). These findings provide solid
evidence that leadership is an essential consideration when studying the cognitions and behaviors of
aging workers.
spiritual leaders, and so on, we chose to adopt the full-ranged leadership model as the focus in this
study for two reasons. First, the full-ranged leadership is still one of the most influential research para-
digms to empirically test the leadership influence on employees’ behaviors (e.g., Judge & Piccolo,
2004; Moynihan, Pandey, & Wright, 2012). The model is used as a platform to integrate similar lead-
ership theories (Antonakis & House, 2013), and our findings could supplement the existing literature
by understanding how these leadership styles relate to successful aging in the workplace. From a career
development point of view, these leadership styles are malleable and can be changed through interven-
tion (e.g., training and executive coaching). Thus, organization can support the successful aging in the
workplace via the modification of leadership styles. In the following section, we will describe in detail
how these perceived leadership styles relate to successful aging in the workplace.
Employees’ perception of transactional leadership on successful aging. Transactional leadership occurs when
leaders reward or discipline the followers depending on the adequacy of the latter’s behaviors and per-
formance (Bass, 1985). Leaders clarify the performance criteria and the outcomes once the subordi-
nates complete the assigned tasks. Furthermore, these leaders usually provide help and supervision
only when they note their subordinates’ work deviate from the norm. Similar to transformational lead-
ership, past research suggests that transactional leadership styles are significantly related to employ-
ees’ job satisfaction and job performance (e.g., Judge & Piccolo, 2004). However, when subordinates’
aging process is concerned, we will expect a different pattern between perceived transformational and
transactional leaders and their association on successful aging in the workplace.
As discussed, transactional leadership only emphasizes short-term and negotiated job performance
of subordinates, aging workers may perceive that their long-term developmental needs are not prior-
itized or even being considered. In the long run, perceived transactional leadership accentuates feelings
of alienation among aging employees (Sarros, Tanewski, Winter, Santora, & Densten, 2002) and low-
ers the chance for further occupational growth. Given that transactional leadership is oriented toward
task performance, subordinates perceive that they are fully responsible for a job task, regardless of
whether they have sufficient resources or competence to execute it. As the workplace constantly
changes, transactional leaders may not be ready to notice and reduce the barriers and pitfalls aging
workers encounter, which makes successful aging difficult to achieve. Finally, when aging workers
perceive that their leaders do not take corrective action when needed, it will hinder the opportunity
to occupational growth, resilience, and satisfaction (Bass & Yammarino, 1991; Harland, Harrison,
Jones, & Reiter-Palmon, 2005; Yammarino & Bass, 1990). Thus, we hypothesize that employees’ per-
ceived transactional leadership styles are negatively related to successful aging in the workplace.
In sum, prior research often indicates strong intercorrelation between transactional and transforma-
tional leadership. These leadership styles were both important factor to drive individual and group per-
formance. In this study, however, we would expect these two perceived leadership styles would have
different relationship with successful aging in the workplace. Successful aging in the workplace
focuses on whether the aging workers could satisfy their developmental needs. We argue that per-
ceived transactional leadership style would be negatively related to such process, as this leadership
style primarily focuses on employees’ current job performance and whether they can execute the des-
ignated goal. Individual development is not of the leaders’ concern, and this perceived leadership style
may not support the successful aging process in the workplace. However, transformational leadership
is development oriented for the purpose of change (e.g., Bass, 1985; Bass & Avolio, 1990). These lead-
ers will motivate and inspire their subordinates to be creative and ready to adopt new methods in their
work. For instance, recent studies by Jung and Pieterse, Knippenberg, Schippers, and Stam reported
that it was only transformational leaders but not transactional leaders who encourage subordinates’
innovative behaviors. Drawing from these analyses, we hypothesized that perceived transactional lead-
ers will be negatively related to successful aging in the workplace.
Laissez-faire leadership and successful aging. At the other end of the full-range leadership continuum is the
laissez-faire leadership: Transactional and transformational leaders belong to active leaders, whereas
laissez-faire leaders are passive leaders who are not actively involved or simply avoid the leadership
role on their subordinates. Meta-analysis by Judge and Piccolo (2004) showed that laissez-faire lead-
ership is negatively related to the job satisfaction and motivation of subordinates, subordinate satisfac-
tion with leader, and the perceived job performance and effectiveness of leaders. Based on these
results, we hypothesize that the employees’ perceived laissez-faire leadership is negatively related
6 Journal of Career Development XX(X)
to successful aging in the workplace. Compared with younger workers, aging workers are more likely
to encounter different workplace challenges, such as higher perceived discrimination (Chiu, Chan,
Snape, & Redman, 2001) and the decline of physical strength and cognitive abilities (see Hedge, Bor-
man, & Lammlein, 2006, for review). The absence of leadership may hinder aging employees from
adapting to the changing work environment and fulfilling their job tasks. Work relations will be nega-
tively affected because laissez-faire leaders are often being perceived as distancing themselves from
their subordinates. Finally, laissez-faire leaders do not actively help their subordinates achieve their
work goals. Therefore, this type of perceived leadership negatively affects the motivation and compe-
tence of aging workers to formulate future work goals.
Study Objective
In sum, our primary objective is to evaluate how the employees’ perception of their supervisor’s lead-
ership relates to successful aging in the workplace. Although these leadership styles will be relevant to
both younger and aging workers, we believe these leadership styles may have different importance for
workers in different generations. For example, transformational leaders often motivate their workers to
think creatively and to provide intellectual stimulation. For younger workers, this style may not be the
most important leadership quality, as younger workers tend to be more flexible and are more readily
seeking stimulation themselves (Holt, Marques, & Way, 2012). For aging workers, however, this will
be very useful in contributing to the successful aging, as these workers may have developed work habit
which may no longer fit the current job task/organization. Besides, as younger workers (e.g., millennial
workforce) have greater amount of parental nurturing received in their development, perceiving lead-
ers showing individualized concerns would be positively evaluated to their adjustment in the work-
place (Holt et al., 2012). However, aging workers with substantial work experience may find these
concerns unnecessary. Therefore, it is worthwhile to examine how different employees’ perceptions
of their supervisor’s leadership style relate to the aging process of the aging workers.
Method
Participants
Participants were recruited from several organizations in Hong Kong including public companies, gov-
ernment divisions, public hospitals, and a nongovernmental organization. We sent research assistants
to these organizations to collect data from employees who gave their participation consent. The
response rate is 92.1%, with a total of 380 questionnaires distributed and 350 valid questionnaires col-
lected. The participants were full-time employed Hong Kong Chinese working adults aged 45–67
years (M ¼ 51.9, SD ¼ 5.2). Of the 350 participants, 129 (36.9%) were men and 220 (62.9%) were
women. One participant did not declare his or her gender identity. Ninety-four (26.9%) participants
were managers or professionals, whereas the remaining were frontline workers, clerks, and nonskilled
workers. The average tenure length was 11.89 years (SD ¼ 9.10).
Procedure
The research assistants distributed a questionnaire package containing the study objectives, informa-
tion use, and measures to each eligible participant, after obtaining his or her informed consent.
Cheung et al. 7
Participation was voluntary. A supermarket coupon worth HKD50 (equivalent to US$6.4) was given to
each participant as an incentive to enhance response rate.
The questionnaire items were originally written in English. Based on the translation approach out-
lined by Brislin (1980), we hired a professional translator who translated the questionnaire items into
Chinese. An individual who had no prior knowledge of the scales conducted back translation. Inves-
tigators of this study then compared the original items with the newly translated version.
Measures
Leadership style. Leadership styles were measured by the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5X. The
scale consists of 36 items for measuring the three leadership styles, namely, transformational, transac-
tional, and laissez-faire leadership. The Transformational Leadership Scale consisted of five subscales
including idealized (behavior) and idealized influence (attribute), inspirational motivation, intellectual
stimulation, and individualized consideration. Four items assessed each subscale. Sample items were
“talks optimistically about the future” and “seeks differing perspectives when solving problems.” The
Transactional Leadership Scale consisted of three subscales, namely, Contingent Reward, Active Man-
agement by Exception, and Passive Management by Exception. Similar to transformational leadership,
4 items assessed each dimension of transactional leadership. Sample items were “provides me with
assistance in exchange for my efforts” and “directs my attention toward failures to meet standards.”
Finally, 4 items were used to measure laissez-faire leadership. Sample items were “avoid getting
involved when important issues arise” and “delaying responding to urgent questions.” Scores on trans-
formational leadership and transactional leaders were found to relate positively to job performance
(Bass, Avolio, Jung, & Berson, 2003), while laissez-faire leadership was negatively related to psycho-
logical distress and role ambiguity. Considering the possibility that participants might have more than
one supervisor or leaders, we deliberately asked the participants to respond to the questions by using
their immediate supervisor as reference. Participants rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale that ranged
from 0 as never to 4 as always. These scales have demonstrated good internal consistency. The a coef-
ficients of transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and laissez-faire leadership were .89,
.84, and .84, respectively.
Successful aging in the workplace. Successful aging in the workplace was measured by the successful
aging in the Workplace Scale proposed by Robson et al. (2006). The Chinese version of this scale was
used in a local study (Cheung & Wu, 2013). The scale consisted of five subscales, namely, Adaptabil-
ity and Health (18 items), Positive Relationships (7 items), Occupational Growth (8 items), Personal
Security (7 items), and Continued Focus and Achievement of Personal Goals (3 items). Sample items
include “I accept suggestions for improving my performance,” “I am satisfied with my coworkers,”
and “my career is still growing.” Participants rated their feelings and attitudes toward their work on
a 5-point scale that ranged from 1 as strongly disagree to 5 as strongly agree. Higher scores indicate
higher levels of the five dimensions. These scales have demonstrated good internal consistency. In a
prior study, the a coefficients of the successful aging in the Workplace Scale ranged from .78 to .88,
and these scales were significantly related to job satisfaction and intention to stay in the organization
(Cheung & Wu, 2013). In this study, the a coefficients for adaptability and health, positive relation-
ship, occupational growth, personal security, and continuous focus and achievement of goals were .88,
.84, .85, .82, and .83, respectively.
Demographic variables. Participants were asked to report their age, gender, and duration in years of work
experience (tenure).
8 Journal of Career Development XX(X)
Results
Correlation Analysis
Table 1 presents correlation results. In terms of demographic information on successful aging in the
workplace, the only significant correlation was between tenure and continued focus and achievement
of goals (r ¼ .13, p ¼ .02). In other words, demographic information did not relate strongly with suc-
cessful aging in the workplace dimensions.
In terms of employees’ perception of their supervisor’s transformational leadership, we found sig-
nificant correlations between this perceived leadership style with all successful aging in the workplace
dimensions including continued focus and achievement of personal goals (r ¼ .35, p < .01), adaptabil-
ity and health (r ¼ .38, p < .01), personal security (r ¼ .39, p < .01), positive relations (r ¼ .45, p < .01),
and occupational growth (r ¼ .51, p < .01).
For employees’ perception of their supervisor’s transactional leadership, we found that it was posi-
tively related to four successful aging dimensions including personal security (r ¼ .12, p ¼ .02), pos-
itive relations (r ¼ .18, p < .01), continued focus and achievement of personal goals (r ¼ .19, p < .01),
and occupational growth (r ¼ .29, p < .01).
Finally, employees’ perception of their supervisor’s laissez-faire leadership style was negatively
correlated with all successful aging in the workplace dimensions including adaptability and health
(r ¼ .29, p < .01), positive relationship (r ¼ .21, p < .01), occupational growth (r ¼ .17, p <
Cheung et al. 9
Means, Standard
Deviations, and
Intercorrelations
among the Study
Variables (N ¼ 350) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. Age 1
2. Gender .11* 1
3. Tenure .18** .11* 1
4 Perceived .09 .07 .08 1
transformational
leadership
5 Perceived .04 .06 .01 .58** 1
transactional
leadership
6 Perceived laissez- .15** .00 .0 .04 .42** 1
faire leadership
7. Adaptability and .02 .05 .08 .38** .10 .29** 1
health
8. Positive .02 .05 .04 .45** .18** .21** .61** 1
relationship
9. Occupational .04 .04 .00 .51** .29** .17** .64** .61** 1
growth
10. Personal .01 .00 .08 .39** .12* .25** .64** .53** .61** 1
security
11. Continuous .06 .05 .13* .35** .19** .17** .60** .51** .60** .62** 1
focus and
achievement of
goals
M 51.88 — 11.89 1.97 1.89 1.74 2.16 1.99 1.89 1.94 1.83
SD 5.15 — 9.10 0.73 0.65 0.95 0.89 0.81 0.89 0.82 0.88
Range 45–67 — 1–42 0.15–3.6 0.08–3.25 0–4 0–4 0–4 0–4 0–4 0–4
Note. N ¼ 350.
*p < .05. **p < .01.
.01), personal security (r ¼ .25, p < .01), and continued focus and achievement of personal goals (r ¼
.17, p < .01).
Regression Analysis
Finally, as the employees’ perception of their supervisor’s leadership style showed some overlapping
with each other, we performed multiple regression to examine how the three perceived leadership
styles relate to the five successful aging in the workplace dimensions. Specifically, the three employ-
ees’ perception of their supervisor’s leadership styles were entered as the predictors and five regression
models were performed, with the five successful aging in the workplace dimension as the outcome
variable. Table 2 presents the details of the regression results. Across all the regression models,
employees’ perceived transformational leadership style was positively related to all successful aging
in the workplace dimensions, even when the other two leadership styles were considered. Thus,
Hypothesis 1 was supported. In terms of perceived transactional leadership, it was positively related
to occupational growth only. Thus, Hypothesis 2 was not supported. Finally, perceived laissez-faire
10
Table 2. Regression Analyses on Successful Aging in the Workplace.
Perceived transformational leadership .24 .04 .38** .40 .06 .44** .34 .05 .42** .34 .06 .39** .29 .07 .28**
Perceived transactional leadership .01 .05 .01 .01 .07 .01 .12 .06 .14* .01 .07 .01 .13 .08 .12
Perceived laissez-faire leadership .13 .03 .27** .14 .04 .20** .13 .03 .21** .16 .04 .23** .16 .05 .21**
R2 .22 .24 .29 .21 .16
F for change in R2 32.00** 35.93** 46.29** 30.45 21.13**
Note. N ¼ 350.
*p < .05. **p < .01.
Cheung et al. 11
leadership was negatively related to all successful aging in the workplace dimensions. Hypothesis 3
was thus supported.
Discussion
This study examined the association between employees’ perception of their supervisor’s leadership
style and successful aging in the workplace. In line with our hypotheses, employees’ perception of
their supervisor’s transformational leadership was positively, while perceived laissez-faire leadership
was negatively related to successful aging in the workplace. Contradictory to our hypothesis, perceived
transactional leadership was positively related to occupational growth.
advancement. Therefore, leaders should help the aging workers adapt to new tasks and environment,
assist them in strengthening their social networks, and support their occupational growth. In summary,
supervisory input is still inevitable if the aging workers wish to continue to excel in the jobs.
Limitations
This study has several limitations and results should be interpreted with caution. First, this study used a
self-reported cross-sectional design, wherein participants were recruited at a single time point. Adopt-
ing this research design makes it impossible to draw causal inference directly. This is particularly
important as successfully aging workers may elicit different leader’s behaviors. Common method var-
iance might have inflated the observed associations (Podsakoff et al., 2003). Harman’s one-factor test
provided evidence that common method variance has not significantly inflated the observed relations,
but future studies should obtain data from other sources (e.g., leaders’ data) for external validation.
Besides, as has been recently discussed by Zacher (2015), to better understand successful aging in the
workplace, longitudinal data will be optimal as the data across time can document the intraindividual
changes across different times in one’s career life span.
Second, we only recruited Chinese participants in Hong Kong. Thus, whether our findings can read-
ily be generalized to other cultural contexts is still unknown. For example, we reported that passive
management by exception is positively related to successful aging in the workplace. We also specu-
lated whether the positive correlation is a result of the unique cultural background that treasures “face”
in Chinese society. However, prompt feedback is often found to be important for performance, such as
task effectiveness and social integration (Kim, Cable, Kim, & Wang, 2009). Thus, additional studies
that compare the Chinese and Western aging workers are warranted to compare and contrast the role of
different leadership styles on successful aging in the workplace.
Third, we did not control for leaders’ age. Past study by Zacher and colleagues suggested that lead-
ers’ age would inevitably affect subordinates’ perception. In particular, when an aging worker is under
supervision by a young leader, it is very likely that the role modeling effect is less crucial and less
influential. Thus, it is also important to consider the age of the leader. Future studies should measure
this and use that as control or covariate.
Finally, participants were largely working in the government and major utility companies. Since the
human resource policies and pension system differ significantly with other private organizations,
future studies might include participants from more different organizational settings.
when compared to their younger counterparts. However, when the job tasks are relatively well struc-
tured, the importance of leaders’ support may not be necessary. Thus, it allows us to understand how
the interaction between the subordinates/task characteristics interacts with the leadership in shaping
successful aging experience in the workplace.
From a practical point of view, the results can provide valuable insights to leaders to promote suc-
cessful aging in the workplace. For instance, apart from aiming at provision of work support, such as
training (Leppel & Brucker, 2012) or human resource policy that supports aging workers (e.g.,
Armstrong-Stassen & Ursel, 2009) to enhance successful aging at work, considering the type of lead-
ership style that leaders should adopt might also be important. While inspiring subordinates to develop
work solutions or providing necessary individualized consideration (i.e., transformational leadership)
is important, leaders can also support successful aging by formulating key work goals and providing
rewards when such goals are achieved (i.e., transactional leadership).
In sum, this study suggests that a mixture of perceived transactional and transformational leader’s
styles is important to support successful aging in the workplace. This is in line with Avolio’s (2011)
hypothesis, which suggests that transformational leadership adds transactional leadership in its effects
on followers’ motivation, satisfaction, and performance. Leaders can encourage aging workers to
imagine and think in innovative ways, such as raising their curiosity, and encouraging openness to new
and inspirational ideas. This finding is especially important for aging workers because when they have
been part of the workplace for sometime, they have established work habits behaviorally and cogni-
tively, which may become obsolete when new technological advancement becomes available. There-
fore, encouraging their creativity, empowering them to experiment with new ideas and challenging the
status quo, and not intervening unless in cases of serious accident or error are important for aging
workers to age successfully in the workplace.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
References
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2013). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In B. J. Avoli & F. J.
Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition
(Monographs in leadership and management) (Vol. 5, pp. 3–33). Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley,
UK: Emerald Group.
Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the
retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 201–220. doi:10.
1348/096317908X288838
Avolio, B. J. (2011). Full range leadership development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transforma-
tional and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218.
Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (1991). Congruence of self and others’ leadership ratings of naval officers for
understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology, 40, 431–454. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1991.
tb01002.x
14 Journal of Career Development XX(X)
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W.
Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2): Methodology (pp. 389–444). Needham Heights,
MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2013). Hong Kong Monthly
Digest of Statistics, feature article: Updated Hong Kong Labor Force Projections for 2013 to 2041. Retrieved
March 10, 2014, from http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B71309FB2013XXXXB0100.pdf
Cheung, F., & Wu, A. M. S. (2012). An investigation of predictors of successful aging in the workplace among Hong
Kong Chinese older workers. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 449–464. doi:10.1017/S104161021100192X
Cheung, F., & Wu, A. M. S. (2013). Older workers’ successful aging and intention to stay. Journal of Managerial
Psychology, 28, 645–660. doi:10.1108/JPM-09-2011-0062
Chiu, W. C. K., Chan, A. W., Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2001). Age stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes towards
older workers. An East-West comparison. Human Relations, 54, 629–661. doi:10.1177/0018726701545004
Dansereau, F., Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal
organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower
development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–744.
doi:10.2307/3069307
Emery, C. R., & Barker, K. J. (2007). Effect of commitment, job involvement and teams on customer satisfaction
and profit. Team Performance Management, 13, 90–101. doi:10.1108/13527590710759847
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership
theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental
approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143–166). Kent, OH: Kent State
University Press.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness.
New York, NY: Paulist Press.
Harland, L., Harrison, W., Jones, J. R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Leadership behaviors and subordinate
resilience. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 2–14. doi:10.1177/107179190501100202
Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Lammlein, S. E. (2006). The aging workforce: Realities, myths, and implications
for organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Holt, S., Marques, J., & Way, D. (2012). Bracing for the millennial workforce: Looking for ways to inspire
Generation Y. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9, 81–93.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their
relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development and work motivation. Academy of Management
Review, 29, 440–458. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.13670969
Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and
dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 246–255. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246
Kim, T. Y., Cable, D. M., Kim, S. P., & Wang, J. (2009). Emotional competence and work performance: The
mediating effect of proactivity and the moderating effect of job autonomy. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 30, 983–1000. doi:10.1002/job.610
Leppel, K., & Brucker, E. (2012). The importance of job training to job satisfaction of older workers. Journal of
Aging and Social Policy, 24, 62–76. doi:10.1080/08959420.2012.629136
Loretto, W., & White, P. (2006). Employers’ attitudes, practices and policies towards older workers. Human
Resource Management, 16, 313–330. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00013.x
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron,
J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). San Francisco, CA:
Barrett-Koehler.
Cheung et al. 15
Moynihan, D., Pandey, S., & Wright, B. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters
performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 143–164.
Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for
transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25,
897–933.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural
research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88,
879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Purvanova, R. K., Bono, J. E., & Dzieweczynski, J. (2006). Transformational leadership, job characteristics, and
organizational citizenship performance. Human Performance, 19, 1–22. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1901_1
Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical
extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329–354. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009
Robson, S. M., Hansson, R. O., Abalos, A., & Booth, M. (2006). Successful aging: Criteria for aging well in the
workplace. Journal of Career Development, 33, 156–177. doi:10.1177/0894845306292533
Sarros, J. C., Tanewski, G. A., Winter, R. P., Santora, J. C., & Densten, I. L. (2002). Work alienation and orga-
nizational leadership. British Journal of Management, 13, 285–304. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00247
Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 702–714.
doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.702
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-
concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594. doi:doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
Van Vianen, A. E. M., Dalhoeven, B. A. G. W., & De Pater, I. E. (2011). Aging and training and development
willingness: Employee and supervisor mindsets. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 226–247. doi:10.
1002/job.685
Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human
Relations, 43, 975–995. doi:10.1177/001872679004301003
Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 6–16.
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job
complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 32, 291–318. doi:10.1002/job.683
Zacher, H. (2015). Successful aging at work. Work, Aging, and Retirement, 1, 4–25.
Author Biographies
Francis Cheung is an associate professor at the Department of Applied Psychology, Lingnan University, Hong
Kong. He is a graduate of Hong Kong Baptist University, where he received his bachelor of arts in sociology. He
received his postgraduate diploma in psychology, master of philosophy in industrial and organizational psychol-
ogy, and his doctoral degree at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. His current work focuses on emotional man-
agement in the workplace and vocational behaviors of older workers. In his spare time, he enjoys traveling,
reading, going to movies, and spending quality time with his wife and family.
Dannii Y. Yeung, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Applied Social Sciences at City University
of Hong Kong. She received her PhD degree from the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Her research topics
include aging and work, retirement adjustment, and emotion regulation.
Anise M. S. Wu is currently an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Macau.
She was awarded the PhD degree (in psychology) at the Chinese University of Hong Kong for her work on post-
humous organ donation. Her major research is concerned with both individual and public health, with specific
focuses on addictive behaviors, older adults’ well-being, volunteerism, and organ donation. In leisure time, she
enjoys movie, wine, and travel with families and friends.