Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Estevez 2017
Estevez 2017
From the *Postgraduate Program in Endodontics, European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; and †Faculty of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry,
The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Address requests for reprints to Dr Giampiero Rossi-Fedele, Faculty of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, Oliphant
Building Level 5 Room 509, 5005 Adelaide, SA, Australia. E-mail address: giampiero.rossi-fedele@adelaide.edu.au
0099-2399/$ - see front matter
Copyright ª 2017 American Association of Endodontists.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.041
Specimen lengths were standardized to (ReadySteel), root canal shaping was performed up to size 40 taper
16 mm by cutting the coronal part with a 0.6 using an R40 instrument mounted on a VDW. Gold Reciproc
slow-speed saw (Isomet Buhler, Lake Bluff, motor (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) following the
IL). Their length was verified using a 150- manufacturer’s instructions. During instrumentation, all canals
mm digital caliper (Vernier Software & received 1.5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (Dentaflux, Madrid, Spain) between
Technology, Beaverton, OR). A ReadySteel instruments delivered using a syringe and a side-vented 27-G needle
size 10 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer, (Monoject, Tyco Healthcare, Mettawa,IL)positionedat theWL2 mm.A
Ballaigues, Switzerland) was inserted in the finalrinsewith3mLNaOCl was performed.
root canals until it was visible through the After preparation, the roots were removed from the matrix, and a
apical foramen under magnification. The longitudinal groove was created in 1 of the halves under
working length (WL) was established by magnification using a double-sided diamonddisc of 0.1-mm thickness
reducing this length by 1 mm. Subsequently, (KometDental, Lemgo, Germany) mounted on a laboratory
the apical 15 mm of the specimens was handpiece. The groove created did not reach the canal in order to
inserted in a hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane prevent damage (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, the root was cleaved into 2
regular body impression material matrix fragments using a disposable #15 scalpel blade (Hu-Friedy,
(Garant Imprint II; 3M ESPE, Madrid, Tuttlingen, Germany) (Fig. 1B).
Spain) in order to prepare a customized Two lines perpendicular to the canal and the long axis to the
model for each sample. After manual tooth at the WL 2 mm and the WL – 6 mm as measured with a digital
preflaring using size 15 and 20 K-files caliper were created using a fine-tip black marker in 1 of the root
Figure 1. (A) A root sample with the longitudinal groove not reaching the canal. (B) A root half after cleavage. (C) A root half with 2 lines
perpendicular to the canal at the WL – 2 mm and the WL – 6 mm. (D) A 2-mm round diamond bur inserted in the groove establishing its
depth. (E) Placement of the palatal mucosa
samples in the groove. (F) A reassembled specimen.
TABLE 1. The Mean Initial and Final Weights, Weight Changes, and Percentage of Reduction for the Experimental Groups after the
Irrigation Assays
Weight change
Initial weight (mg) Final weight (mg) (initial – final) (mg )
Percentage of
Mean weight reduction
Group Mean (SD) Mean (SD) (95% CI [LL–UL ]) (mean) P value
PP Vista 6% plain 4.77 (0.84) 3.68 (0.86) 1.090 (0.705–1.475) 22.85 <.001
(n = 20)
PP Chlor-Xtra (n 4.77 (0.84) 3.23 (0.84) 1.545 (1.160–1.930) 32.28 <.001
= 20)
PUI-15 Vista 6% plain (n = 4.56 (1.01) 3.29 (0.90) 1.275 (0.890–1.660) 27.85 <.001
20)
PUI-15 Chlor-Xtra (n = 4.67 (1.21) 1.91 (0.98) 2.760 (2.375–3.145) 59.10 <.001
20)
PUI-30 Vista 6% plain (n = 4.56 (1.01) 2.17 (1.08) 2.395 (2.010–2.780) 52.41 <.001
20)
PUI-30 Chlor-Xtra (n = 4.52 (1.09) 1.63 (0.87) 2.885 (2.500–3.270) 63.71 <.001
20)
CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; PP, positive pressure; PUI, passive ultrasonic irrigation; SD, standard deviation; UL, upper limit.
Basic Research — Technology
Basic Research—Technology replacement of NaOCl into the longitudinal groove containing the
porcine palatal mucosa samples because the solutions were delivered
performed significantly better than PP with at the apical end of the longitudinal groove. Another possible
Chlor-XTRA (P < .05). Similarly, no mechanism of action will be the breaking up of gas bubbles ahead of
significant differences were found when the advancing front of root canal irrigant, as previously reported (15).
comparing PUI-15 with Vista 6% plain It must be reiterated that the presence of a surfactant per se does not
versus PP with Chlor-XTRA (P = .158) and improve the tissue dissolution capacity of NaOCl (16, 17).
when comparing PUI-30 with Vista 6% plain The present study examined the final phase of irrigation after
versus PUI-15 with ChlorXTRA (P = .309). canal shaping, considering that the latter is regarded as a radicular
access for irrigants into the intricate canal system morphology (15).
Also, it is not possible to precisely prepare a longitudinal groove
Discussion before canal
The addition of a surfactant to NaOCl preparation,and,ifthesampletissueisplacedintothegroovebeforepreparat
and PUI, solely or in combination, increased ion, there is thelikelihood it will bedislodged orremovedduring this
porcine palatal mucosa dissolution; however, procedure.However,itisworthnotingthatorganictissuedissolutionalsooc
with 30 seconds of PUI, no significant curs beforehand (during canal shaping) if NaOCl is used as the
differences between the 2 irrigants were irrigant.
found. PUI and/or lowered surface tension The inclusion of a longitudinal groove within prepared root
likely enhanced lateral penetration and canals in closed systems (ie, with a restricted fluid apical flow) has
60 seconds of NaOCl irrigation, and it is different teeth (or different parts of 1 tooth) may be dissimilar, thus
likely that the large volume of the final adding a potential source of bias.
NaOCl rinse has subsequently reduced this The present study results are in contrast to those from De-Deus et
issue. al (3), which found no differences between Chlor-XTRA and a
Porcine palatal mucosa has been used counterpart with the same available chlorine and no surfactants when
previously to assess the soft tissue tested using previously extracted vital single-rooted teeth with oval
dissolution capacity of NaOCl (11, 21, 23). canals. The contrasting results can be explained by several
Even though it takes longer to dissolve methodological differences regarding the irrigation protocol. These
compared with pulp tissue, this mucosa include the commencement of tissue dissolution during
presents no qualitative differences regarding instrumentation and a larger total volume of NaOCl (30 mL) for a
solubilizing capacity (23). The use of human total time of 30 minutes, which included a final rinse using 12 mL
pulp tissue would be ideal; however, it is NaOCl for 20 minutes. Thus, the greater irrigation times and irrigant
worth noting that seminal studies showed volumes in their study probably compensated for the effects related to
that there is a wide variance in the histologic the lowered surface tension. Also, the study examined healthy pulps,
appearance of ‘‘normal pulps’’’ and that it is whereas the present one used porcine mucosa placed in artificial
problematic to correlate diagnostic data and grooves.
histologic findings for this tissue (24, 25). The present study results are in agreement with those from
Subsequently, human pulp tissue from Merivale et al (26), looking at the removal of collagen from canal
walls using ultrasonication and solutions with different surface
3. De-Deus G, Pinho MA, Reis C, et al. Sodium 8. Merino A, Estevez R, de Gregorio C, Cohenca N. The effect of different taper
hypochlorite with reduced surface tension does not preparations on the ability of sonic and passive ultrasonic irrigation to reach
improve in situ tissue dissolution. J Endod working length in curved canals. Int Endod J 2013;46:427–33.
2013;39:1039–43. 9. Paragliola R, Franco V, Fabiani C, et al. Final rinse optimization: influence of
4. Cunningham WT, Cole JS, Balekjian AY. Effect of different agitation protocols. J Endod 2010;36:282–5.
alcohol on the spreading ability of sodium 10. Sainz-Pardo M, Estevez R, Valencia de Pablo O, et al. Root canal penetration of a
hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg sodium hypochlorite mixture using sonic or ultrasonic activation. Braz Dent J
1982;54:333–5. 2014;25:489–93.
5. Abou-Rass M, Patonai FJ. The effects of decreasing 11. Conde AJ, Estevez R, Loro~no G, et al. Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on
surface tension on the flow of irrigating solutions in organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium
narrow root canals. Oral Surg 1982;54:524–6. hypochlorite and EDTA. Int Endod J 2016 Nov 3 [Epub ahead of print].
6. Bukiet F, Couderc C, Camps C, et al. Wetting 12. Rossi-Fedele G, de Figueiredo JA, Abbott PV. Teeth with double internal
4 Estevez et al. JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2017
properties and critical micellar concentration of inflammatory resorption: report of two cases. Aust Endod J 2010;36:123–9.
benzalkonium chloride mixed in sodium 13. Heithersay GS. Management of tooth resorption. Aust Dent J 2007;52:S104–21.
hypochlorite. J Endod 2012;38:1525–9. 14. British Pharmacopoeia. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office for Department of Health
7. De Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, et al. Effect and Social Security, British Pharmacopoeia, 12th ed. London, UK: HMSO; 1973:
of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation of the A46.
penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated 15. Gulabivala K, Ng Y-L, Gilbertson M, Eames I. The fluid mechanics of root canal
lateral canals: an in vitro study. J Endod irrigation. Physiol Meas 2010;31:R49–84.
2009;35:891–9.