4/2/2020 Rubric Detail – a063X00001W7ToLQAV

RUBRIC DETAIL
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this
item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: Assessment 1A Marking Guide

Exit

Grid View List View

Fail Pass Credit Distin

  (Unacceptable) (Functional) (Pro cient) (Adva
0-49% 50-64% 65-74% 75 -84

Evaluation of 0 (0.00%) - 5.88 6 (20.00%) - 7.68 9 (30.0

(19.60%) (25.60%)
8.4 (28.00%) (33.60
sources and
information Limited Resembles a recall Discri
7.8 (26.00%) - 8.88
selected for understanding or summary of key betwe
(29.60%)
annotated of key concepts ideas. Often of per
bibliography required to con ates/confuses Analyses and and in
form annotated assertion of summarises subst
bibliography. personal opinion information robus
Confuses logic with information from the from
and emotion. substantiated by research/course resea
Information evidence from the materials. mater
taken from research/course Demonstrates a exten
reliable sources materials. Analysis capacity to Well d
but without a and evaluation do explain and capac
coherent not re ect expert apply relevant and a
analysis or judgement, concepts. conce
synthesis. intellectual Identify logical Viewp
Viewpoints of independence, aws. exper
experts are rigor and Questions to que
taken as fact adaptability. viewpoints of Analy
with little experts. evalu
questioning. growi
judge
intelle
indep
rigor
adapt

https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_4333817_1&cours… 1/3
4/2/2020 Rubric Detail – a063X00001W7ToLQAV

Fail Pass Credit Distin

  (Unacceptable) (Functional) (Pro cient) (Adva
0-49% 50-64% 65-74% 75 -84

E ective 0 (0.00%) - 3.675 3.75 (12.50%) - 4.8 4.875 (16.25%) - 5.55

(12.25%) (16.00%) (18.50%)
6
Communication
Di cult to Information, Information, 5.625
understand for arguments and arguments and (21.00
audience, no evidence are evidence are well
logical/clear presented in a way presented, mostly I
structure, poor that is not always clear ow of ideas a
ow of ideas, clear and logical. and arguments. Line a
argument lacks Line of reasoning of reasoning is easy a
supporting is often di cult to to follow. p
evidence. follow. p
Audience i
cannot follow a
the line of s
reasoning. e
D
a
u
o

Correct citation 0 (0.00%) - 5.145 6.825 (22.75%) - 7.77 7.875

(17.15%)
5.985 (25.90%) (29.40
of key
resources and (19.95%)
Demonstrates Demonstrates use of Demo
evidence inconsistent credible resources to of goo
5.25 (17.50%) - 6.72
use of good support and develop credib
(22.40%)
quality, credible ideas. releva
and relevant Demonstrates to sup
resources to use of devel
support and credible and and s
develop ideas relevant Show
resources to wide
support and the or
develop for so
ideas, but evide
these are not
always
explicit or
well
developed.

Raw Total: 20.385 (of 30)

Feedback to Learner

Loveleen
Overall a good e ort with easy to follow structure. You have included 10 articles which are
authentic. However, the main issue is the absence of introduction which makes it very di cult
for the reader to anticipate what is coming up. To provide an understanding of the topic, you
need to clearly re ect your topic and the purpose. Also limited inclusion of articles useful for
Assessment 1B ( nancial bene ts/implications of using Face book at workplace). 

https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_4333817_1&cours… 2/3
4/2/2020 Rubric Detail – a063X00001W7ToLQAV

You have also missed the reference list at the end which is part of APA referencing system.
Please eliminate these issues for your future assessments in order to improve your work
further.
Naseer

Name:Assessment 1A Marking Guide

Exit

https://laureate-au.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_4333817_1&cours… 3/3