The case involved the Philippine Judges Association challenging the constitutionality of a law that reduced the retirement benefits of judges. The Supreme Court held that the law reducing retirement benefits of judges was unconstitutional as it impaired the independence of the judiciary. They applied the principle that statutes should be interpreted based on the plain meaning and intent of the words used.
The case involved the Philippine Judges Association challenging the constitutionality of a law that reduced the retirement benefits of judges. The Supreme Court held that the law reducing retirement benefits of judges was unconstitutional as it impaired the independence of the judiciary. They applied the principle that statutes should be interpreted based on the plain meaning and intent of the words used.
The case involved the Philippine Judges Association challenging the constitutionality of a law that reduced the retirement benefits of judges. The Supreme Court held that the law reducing retirement benefits of judges was unconstitutional as it impaired the independence of the judiciary. They applied the principle that statutes should be interpreted based on the plain meaning and intent of the words used.
Pedro Cosme-Rosado Lydia Esther Rosado-Figueroa Conjugal Partnership Cosme-Rosado Maria Teresa-Cosme Pedro Orlando Cosme-Rodriguez Yaritza Cosme-Rodriguez v. Alfredo Serrano-Rodriguez, as Mayor of the City of Naranjito 3-C Construction Cristino Cruz Jane Doe, 98cv1491 Conjugal Partnership, Cruz-Cruz, 360 F.3d 42, 1st Cir. (2004)
Central Wyoming Law Associates, P.C., Formerly Hursh and Donohue, P.C., D/B/A Hursh, Donohue, & Massey, P.C., a Wyoming Professional Corporation v. The Honorable Robert B. Denhardt, in His Capacity as County Court Judge of Fremont County, Wyoming, and William Flagg, in His Capacity as County Attorney of Fremont County, Wyoming, and Those Acting Under His Direct Supervision, 60 F.3d 684, 10th Cir. (1995)