Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - India
Home > India > India > Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
CONTRIBUTOR
by Vageesh Sharma
Singh & Associates
Introduction
Different substantive and procedural laws in India such as the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC), etc. provide for a mechanism of an appeal in cases of an unfavorable
order/judgement. The preferred appeals are subject to the bar of limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963
('Act').1 This essay highlights the contentious issue of the applicability of the provisions of the Act to the
appeals under sub-section (2) of section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('A&C Act').
Though the Schedule in the Act does not provide for a limitation period to file an appeal under section 37, but
the savings clause of the Act stipulates that in cases where a special/local law does not expressly bar the
application of sections 4 to 24 of the Act, the same shall be applicable.5 This position of law has been ignored
by the Bombay High Court in Jagson International case, wherein it was held that if a special law does not provide
for a period of limitation, then the applicability of the general law of limitation is implicitly excluded.6
The Supreme Court, in ITI Limited v. Siemens Public Communications Network Ltd.7, held that merely because the
A&C Act does not provide for the applicability of the CPC, the inference that the latter is inapplicable, cannot
be accepted. Thus, the provision of the CPC shall be applicable to the appeals preferred under the A&C Act.8
Justice Raveendran, in his concurring judgement in Consolidated Engg. Enterprises and Ors. v. Principal Secy.
Irrigation Dept. and Ors.9 remarked that the objective of section 29(2) and 43(1) of the Limitation Act is to
ensure that the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 apply to appeals under special/local laws, unless they
are expressly excluded. Over-ruling the judgement in Jagson International, the Court, in Consolidated Engg., held
that the provisions of the Limitation Act applies to all proceedings under the A&C Act, unless expressly
excluded by the provisions of the A&C Act.
The Court, in Consolidated Engg., clarified that the 'appeals under CPC' as per Article 116 of the schedule also
refer to the appeals where the procedure of filing such appeals and the powers of the court for dealing with
such appeals are governed by the CPC, in addition to the appeals preferred under the CPC, the period of
limitation being 90 days from the date of the order.
Current Position
Relying upon the judgements as laid down in Consolidated Engg. and Siemens Public Communications, the Kerala
High Court in Prembushan v. Thulasidas10, has held that the period of limitation for filing an appeal under
Section 37(1) (c) of the A&C Act, shall be 90 days from the date of the order. A similar stance has been adopted
by the Meghalaya High Court in North-Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. v. Patel Unity Joint Venture (PUJV)11
wherein it has been held that the provisions of the Limitation Act are applicable to the court proceedings
under the A&C Act and the period of limitation for an appeal under section 37 would be governed by Article
116 of the schedule to the Limitation Act.
Conclusion
https://www.mondaq.com/india/Litigation-Mediation-Arbitration/729502/Applicability-Of-The-Limitation-Act-1963-To-Appeals-Under-Section-372-Of-The-Arbitration-And-Conciliation-Act-1996?login=true 1/2
3/9/2020 Applicability Of The Limitation Act, 1963, To Appeals Under Section 37(2) Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - India
A conjoint perusal of section 43(1), 29(2) of the Act and the Supreme Court decisions in Consolidated Engg. and
ARTICLE
Siemens Communications leads to a conclusion that the period of limitation of 90 days, as prescribed in the
schedule to the Act is applicable to the appeals preferred under section 37 (2) of the A&C Act, though there is
no specific court ruling in this regard.
Footnotes
6 supra note 3
8 Id.,
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific
circumstances.
AUTHOR(S)
Vageesh Sharma
Singh & Associates
About | Blog | Contact Us | Contributors | Feedback | Free News Alerts | T&Cs | Unsubscribe | Your Privacy
https://www.mondaq.com/india/Litigation-Mediation-Arbitration/729502/Applicability-Of-The-Limitation-Act-1963-To-Appeals-Under-Section-372-Of-The-Arbitration-And-Conciliation-Act-1996?login=true 2/2