The document summarizes the results of an experiment that tested the effect of Ciprofloxacin and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on the development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Line graphs and pie charts are used to analyze the data. The line graphs show that the control group grew the most with a slope of 6.11, while the L. rhamnosus GG group grew the least with a slope of 4.75. The pie charts indicate that the Ciprofloxacin group had the lowest rate of development, while the Cipro/L. rhamnosus GG group saw the highest growth in the largest size range. Despite efforts to control for errors, some limitations
The document summarizes the results of an experiment that tested the effect of Ciprofloxacin and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on the development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Line graphs and pie charts are used to analyze the data. The line graphs show that the control group grew the most with a slope of 6.11, while the L. rhamnosus GG group grew the least with a slope of 4.75. The pie charts indicate that the Ciprofloxacin group had the lowest rate of development, while the Cipro/L. rhamnosus GG group saw the highest growth in the largest size range. Despite efforts to control for errors, some limitations
The document summarizes the results of an experiment that tested the effect of Ciprofloxacin and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on the development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Line graphs and pie charts are used to analyze the data. The line graphs show that the control group grew the most with a slope of 6.11, while the L. rhamnosus GG group grew the least with a slope of 4.75. The pie charts indicate that the Ciprofloxacin group had the lowest rate of development, while the Cipro/L. rhamnosus GG group saw the highest growth in the largest size range. Despite efforts to control for errors, some limitations
The Effect of Ciprofloxacin and Lactobacillus rhamnosus
GG on the Development of Caenorhabditis elegans
Sharlene Manlongat Niles North High School
Results
Error Analysis Data Analysis
Transferring C. elegans: from the original culture to the petri Line Graph 1: depicts trendlines of the daily C. elegans amount per trial. The dishes. A sterile scalpel was used to cut off chunks in the original plate to transfer into the newly prepared sterile NGM similarity of these two trials’ trend lines indicated a definitive “normal” growth rate for plates that were yet to be seeded. Each chunk was gently the control group. L. rhamnosus GG trials fluctuated the most, but had an overall curve picked up with the scalpel. The petri dish lids were opened at similar to the control. All trials began at a range of 50 C. elegans then proceeded to end an angle then the worm “chunk” was placed upside down. Exposure to air has a potential for contamination which would with a range of 110 C. elegans thus suggesting a wide divergence in growth curves. disrupt the results. Although no contamination was observed, Line Graph 2: depicts the trend per group (an average of the two trials per there is still a potential error influencing the results. experimental group) and a slope trendline. The transparent slopes demonstrate the Administering diluted solution of L. rhamnosus: Instances magnitude of progression in the amount of C. elegans per group. The projected slope of of exposing the internal environment of the petri dish may the control group is greater than the rest with a slope of 6.11. Comparatively, the result in contamination. The solution was not originally administered into the nematode growth medium like projected slope of the L. rhamnosus GG group is only 4.75. The slopes of the ciprofloxacin. The diluted solution used deionized and sterile Ciprofloxacin group and Cipro/L. rhamnosus GG groups are most similar with slopes of water and was administered via sterile pipette. Although it was 0.688 and 0.589 respectively. The group of Cipro/L. Rhamnosus GG had a higher sterilized and contained only L. rhamnosus GG, there is still a chance for data error caused by L. rhamnosus exposure even amount of C. elegans as indicated by the dark green line (LRGG/Cip) with a range of though none was observed. 0-61 C. elegans compared to the yellow line’s (Ciprofloxacin) range of 0-24 C. elegans. Pie Charts: illustrate the percentage of C. elegans within each size range of 0.2mm Quantification of worm’s size: Each plate was divided into four quadrants in eight pictures were taken with an inverted out of the total C. elegans counted per group. The outlier for growth in the upper half microscope. Coupled with the worm’s behavior of burrowing (0.55-1.0mm) was Cip/LRGG group indicating a higher rate of development despite it’s into the nematode growth medium, not all the worms throughout the layers of the agar may be shown in each lower numeral amount values. Whereas 40% for Ciprofloxacin at 0.05-0.25mm picture. Given these reasons, error may have occurred to indicates a lower rate of C. elegans development compared to the Control’s 21.5%. The influence the end result yet given the randomization and corresponding percentage values for the control and L. rhamnosus GG strongly standard protocols taken to reduce error, these results can be considered sound. illustrate a standard growth rate for both groups.
Alpelisib Increases Results When Compared With Cyclosporine As Being A Save Therapy For Severe Extreme Ulcerative Colitis A Retrospective Singlecenter Reviewtqwdi