Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Biotech. Fac., Agron. Dep., Analysis of selected primary metabolites and phenolic profile of ‘Golden
Jamnikarjeva 101, Delicious’ apples from four production systems.
SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia,
Jerneja.Jakopic@bf.uni-lj.si Abstract – Introduction. Apple fruit contains many compounds with positive effects on
human health but even small pesticide residues from integrated production cause many food
2
Agric. Inst. Slovenia, safety issues for consumers. Materials and methods. The apple fruits from different types of
Hacquetova ulica 17, production: organic, integrated and two combined systems were analyzed. Their contents of
sugars and organic acids were quantified with the use of HPLC with RI and UV detectors, and
SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia phenolic contents from apple skin and pulp were detected with HPLC-MS. Apple quality was
also determined in terms of weight, firmness and color. Results. Organically produced fruits
had 14% lower weight than integrated fruits, as well as 15% higher firmness and less green
skin color than apples from the other three treatments. Among primary metabolites, the sum of
sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose and sorbitol) as well as organic acids (malic and citric) was
highest in the integrated production treatment. Among secondary metabolites, eighteen indivi-
dual phenolic compounds were determined separately in apple peel and pulp. They were
classified into four groups: hydroxycinnamic acids, flavan-3-ols, dihydrochalcones and flavo-
nols. The majority of the identified compounds were dependent on the applied management
system. Their concentrations were mainly highest in the organic treatment due to higher stress
levels. The multivariate analysis of all monitored parameters placed organic production into
one group and presented a similarity among the other three management systems.
Slovenia / Malus domestica / fruits / integrated plant production / organic
agriculture / proximate composition / quality / Hplc
Table I.
Weight, firmness and chromaticity values of skin color at harvest time of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples produced
with four management systems [organic system, integrated system and two improved integrated production
systems with application of Madex (1% granular virus) or NeemAzal (1% azadirachtin)].
Treatments Weight Firmness a* b* h° L
(g) (kg·cm–2)
Organic 216 ± 5 a 8.5 ± 0.1 b – 4.7 ± 0.7 c 39.5 ± 0.6a 95.6 ± 1.0 a 63.0 ± 0.4 a
Integrated 250 ± 6 b 7.4 ± 0.2 a – 12.2 ± 0.9 b 45.0 ± 0.8 c 105.0 ± 1.2 b 65.5 ± 0.4 b
Madex 237 ± 8 ab 7.4 ± 0.1 a – 19.0 ± 0.3 a 40.4 ± 0.3 a 115.2 ± 0.4 c 65.2 ± 0.4 b
Neem 232 ± 6 ab 7.5 ± 0.1 a – 17.7 ± 0.5 a 42.3 ± 0.4 b 112.7 ± 0.6 c 65.6 ± 0.3 b
Average values ± standard error are presented.
Different letters in columns mean statistically significant differences among the four production systems at α < 0.05.
Table II.
Content levels of primary metabolites (mg·g–1 fresh weight) in ‘Golden Delicious’ apples produced with four
management systems [organic system, integrated system and two improved integrated production systems
with application of Madex (1% granular virus) or NeemAzal (1% azadirachtin)].
Organic 23.4 ± 1.2 a 12.1 ± 0.9 a 16.1 ± 0.7 ab 1.9 ± 0.2 c 53.7 ± 3.9 a 4.0 ± 0.2 b 1.4 ± 0.0 bc 5.4 ± 0.2 b
Integrated 30.3 ± 1.8 b 20.4 b ± 1.4 b 19.4 ± 0.9 c 2.1 ± 0.1 c 68.6 ± 0.3 b 4.0 ± 0.1 b 1.4 ± 0.0 c 5.4 ± 0.1 b
Madex 27.7 ± 1.4 ab 13.0 ± 1.3 a 13.8 ± a 0.7 a 0.4 ± 0.1 a 58.5 ± 2.5 ab 2.8 ± 0.2 a 1.2 ± 0.1 ab 4.0 ± 0.2 a
Neem 32.9 ± 1.8 b 14.2 ± 0.6 a 17.5 ± 0.8 bc 1.0 ± 0.3 b 64.7 ± 4.8 b 3.1 ± 0.2 a 1.1 ± 0.1 a 4.2 ± 0.2 a
the integrated, Madex and Neem treatments ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivar [19], but the con-
in fruit firmness were monitored. tent was higher compared with our results.
Although some authors reported that In our study, significant differences among
fruits from organic and conventional prac- the analyzed production systems were
tices exhibited similar peel color, these find- observed. Apples from integrated produc-
ings were not confirmed in our study [5]. tion contained higher levels of total sugars,
Based on the colorimetrically defined as well as a higher content of glucose, fruc-
parameters, fruit skin color differed between tose and sucrose in comparison with organ-
apples from the organic and integrated pro- ically produced apples. The contents of
duction. Parameter h° is defined on the scale total sugar and fructose in the Madex and
from 0° up to 360°, where 90° is for yellow Neem treatments did not statistically differ
and 180° for green color. The h° values of from those measured in apples of integrated
fruit from organic production were a little production. In the case of glucose and
over 90°, which means that apples were sucrose, the Madex and Neem treatments
more yellow. The h° values of apples pro- (both combinations of organic and inte-
duced in the integrated management system grated production) were similar to organic
were statistically higher, while the highest production. A minor part of total sugars is
values of this parameter were monitored in presented by sorbitol, and the content was
the Madex and Neem treatments. This means not statistically different between apples
that apples from the Madex and Neem treat- from organic and integrated management
ments were visually the greenest; apples of systems.
the integrated production were less green Malic acid was the main organic acid in
and those of the organic production were the apple fruit, followed by citric acid. Total
least green of all. organic acid contents were highest in the
integrated and organic production com-
pared with the other treatments. The con-
3.2. Contents of sugars and organic tent of malic acid was similar in apples of
acids organic and integrated production, and
higher than in the apples of the Madex and
Among primary metabolites, four sugars Neem treatments. Roussos and Gasparatos
and two organic acids were determined. compared organic and conventional apple
The main share of total sugars in apple was production and did not find any differences
presented by fructose (table II). A similar in the titratable acidity between the two pro-
share of fructose in apple fruit has been duction practices [7]. In other comparative
reported by Mikulic Petkovsek et al. for the studies, conventional and integrated “Gala”
Table III.
Content levels (mg·kg–1 fresh weight) of secondary metabolites in the peel of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples
produced with four management systems [organic system, integrated system and two improved integrated
production systems with application of Madex (1% granular virus) or NeemAzal (1% azadirachtin)].
Table IV.
Content levels (mg·kg–1 fresh weight) of secondary metabolites in the pulp of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples
produced with four management systems [organic system, integrated system and two improved integrated
production systems with application of Madex (1% granular virus) or NeemAzal (1% azadirachtin)].
apples were found to have a lower titratable pounds in apple pulp compared with skin
acidity than organic apples [5], but no dif- [7, 19, 20]. These findings confirm that apple
ferences were measured between organic phytoprotective compounds are mainly
and conventional ‘Cortland’ and ‘McIntosh’ localized in the skin, which is the first barrier
apples [4]. for pathogen penetration [21]. Similar results
of phenol composition in apple were also
obtained by Tsao et al. [22].
3.3. Analyses of phenolic Three hydroxycinnamic acids were iden-
compounds tified in apple peel and pulp: chlorogenic,
caffeic and 4-p-coumaroylquinic acid. Their
In our study, the 18 individual phenolic sum was from 45% up to 60% lower in pulp
compounds from four groups of phenolic than in peel and was dependent on the man-
compounds, dihydrochalcones, flavan-3- agement system. In both peel and pulp, the
ols, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonols, highest concentrations were measured in
were determined. In all treatments, a higher apples of the organic production and were
content of individual phenolics as well as lower in apples of the integrated produc-
total phenolics was measured in apple peel tion. Even lower values were determined in
as compared with the content in pulp the Madex and Neem treatments. Similarly,
(table III and IV). Many authors report the Mikulic Petkovsek et al. reported higher lev-
differences in the content of phenolic com- els of hydroxycinnamic acids in organically
produced apple cvs. ‘Topaz’ and ‘Florina’ in not statistically different than that obtained
comparison with apples from integrated from the peel of integrated apples. In apple
production [23]. In contrast, Chinnici et al. pulp, contents were much lower. Accumu-
measured higher concentrations of hydrox- lation of phloridzin is in close correlation
ycinnamic acids in apple cv. ‘Golden Deli- with pathogen pressure [21, 26], which could
cious’ grown in integrated production than explain higher values of dihydrochalcones
in apple from organic production [24]. in organic production where apples are
Among flavan-3-ols, catechin, epicate- more exposed to pathogens.
chin, procyanidin B1 and procyanidin B2 From the group of flavonols, seven quer-
were detected in apple peel. In pulp, in cetin 3-glycosides were determined in
addition to the three determined in skin, an apple peel: quercetin 3-rutinoside, querce-
unidentified procyanidin dimer and a pro- tin 3-galactoside, quercetin 3-glucoside,
cyanidin trimer were detected. The flavan- quercetin 3-arabinopyranoside, quercetin
3-ols together with hydroxycinnamic acids 3-arabinofuranoside, quercetin 3-rhamno-
presented the majority of total phenolic side and quercetin 3-xyloside. The same
compounds in apple pulp. Also, in fruit flavonols were determined in apple pulp
peel, flavan-3-ols represented a high share with the exception of quercetin 3-rutino-
in total phenolics. There were no differ- side and quercetin 3-arabinopyranoside.
ences in the content of flavan-3-ols in apple Contents of flavonols in the peel ranged
peel or pulp among the integrated, Madex from 801 mg·kg–1 fresh weight (Neem) to
and Neem treatments. Similar results from 2183 mg·kg–1 fresh weight (integrated sys-
the three treatments indicate that the iden- tem) and represented the main portion of
tical production practice until the end of July total phenolics in apple peel. In peel, there
plays a key role in the contents of flavan-3- were no statistical differences in the con-
ols in apple. On the other hand, organically tent of flavonols between organic and inte-
produced apples contained 30% more fla- grated apples, but lower values were meas-
van-3-ols in apple peel and 20% more in ured in apples from the Madex and Neem
apple pulp in comparison with apples from treatments. In apple pulp, contents of fla-
integrated production, respectively. Mikulic vonols were essentially lower than in peel
Petkovsek et al. also found higher contents and, moreover, organically produced
of flavan-3-ols in three apple cultivars pro- apples contained higher levels in compari-
duced organically in comparison with son with the other three treatments. How-
apples from integrated production [23]. ever, Chinnini et al., who compared con-
Plants in organic production are exposed to tents of phenolic compounds in apple peel
higher stress levels and, consequently, the and pulp in regard to the applied manage-
synthesis of phenolic compounds in their ment system, detected higher concentra-
fruit is thus greater. Namely, Slatnar et al. tions of flavonols in apples of integrated
reported that apple peel infected with apple production compared with those produced
scab contained up to 3.9 times higher con- organically, both in apple peel and pulp
tent of flavan-3-ols than healthy peel [25]. [24]. On the other hand, Slatnar et al.
Among the dihydrochalcones, phloridzin reported that the concentration of flavonols
and phloertin-2-xyloglucoside were identi- was not dependent on infection with apple
fied in this group and the sum of their con- scab [25] and Mikulic Petkovsek et al. deter-
tent ranged from 184 mg·kg–1 fresh weight mined that cultivars resistant to apple scab
(Neem) to 319 mg·kg–1 fresh weight contained lower contents of quercetin 3-
(Organic) in peel and from 14.7 mg·kg–1 rhamonoside [19]; flavonols may not play a
fresh weight (Neem) to 17.8 mg·kg–1 fresh key role in the defense against apple scab.
weight (Madex) in pulp. Similarly, apples Similar to the higher levels of individual
produced according to the organic practice phenolic compounds in apple peel com-
contained higher levels of dihydrochalcones pared with pulp, much higher values of
in the peel compared with integrated apples. total phenolic content, using Folin-Ciocal-
The level of these compounds in apple peel teu phenol reagent, were measured in the
from the Madex and Neem treatments was peel. This is in accordance with findings
[4] DeEll J.R., Prange R.K., Postharvest quality Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91, Eur. Comm.,
and sensory attributes of organically and Brux., Belg., 2009.
conventionally grown apples, Hortscience
[16] Jakopic J., Veberic R., Stampar F., Effect of
27 (1992) 1096–1099.
reflective foil and hail nets on the lighting,
[5] Peck G.M., Andrews P.K., Reganold J.P., color and anthocyanins of 'Fuji' apple, Sci.
Fellman J.K., Apple orchard productivity and Hortic.-Amsterdam 115 (2007) 40–46.
fruit quality under organic, conventional, and
[17] Singleton V.L., Rossi J.A.J., Colorimetry of
integrated management, Hortscience 41
total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-
(2006) 99–107.
phosphotungstic acid reagents, Am. J. Enol.
[6] Amarante C.V.T. do, Steffens C.A., Mafra Vitic. 16 (1965) 144–158.
A.L., Albuquerque J.A., Yield and fruit quality
[18] Magazin N., Gvozdenovic D., Keserovic Z.,
of apple from conventional and organic pro-
Milic B., Fruit quality of Granny Smith apples
duction systems, Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. picked at different harvest times and treated
43 (2008) 333–340. with 1-MCP, Fruits 65 (2010) 191–197.
[7] Roussos P.A., Gasparatos D., Apple tree [19] Mikulic Petkovsek M., Stampar F., Veberic
growth and overall fruit quality under organic R., Parameters of inner quality of the apple
and conventional orchard management, Sci. scab resistant and susceptible apple culti-
Hortic. Amsterdam 123 (2009) 247–252. vars (Malus domestica Borkh.), Sci. Hortic.
[8] Lee K.W., Kim Y.J., Kim D.O., Lee H.J., Lee -Amsterdam 114 (2007) 37–44.
C.Y., Major phenolics in apple and their [20] Lata B., Trampczynska A., Paczesna J.,
contribution to the total antioxidant capacity, Cultivar variation in apple peel and whole
J. Agric. Food Chem. 51 (2003) 6516–6520. fruit phenolic composition, Sci. Hortic.
-Amsterdam 121 (2009) 176–181.
[9] Stracke B.A., Rufer C.E., Weibel F.P., Bub A.,
Watzl B., Three-year comparison of the poly- [21] Schovankova J., Opatova H., Changes in
phenol contents and antioxidant capacities phenols composition and activity of pheny-
in organically and conventionally produced lalanine-ammonia lyase in apples after fun-
apples (Malus domestica Bork. cultivar 'Gol- gal infections, Hortic. Sci. 38 (2011) 1–10.
den Delicious'), J. Agric. Food Chem. 57
(2009) 4598–4605. [22] Tsao R., Yang R., Christopher J., Zhu Y., Zhu
H.H., Polyphenolic profiles in eight apple
[10] Jakopic J., Stampar F., Veberic R., The cultivars using high-performance liquid chro-
influence of exposure to light on the phenolic matography (HPLC), J. Agric. Food Chem. 51
content of 'Fuji' apple, Sci. Hortic.-Amster- (2003) 6347–6353.
dam 123 (2009) 234–239.
[23] Mikulic Petkovsek M., Slatnar A., Stampar F.,
[11] Nour V., Trandafir I., Ionica M.E., Ascorbic Veberic R., The influence of organic/integra-
acid, anthocyanins, organic acids and mine- ted production on the content of phenolic
ral content of some black and red currant compounds in apple leaves and fruits in four
cultivars, Fruits 66 (2011) 353–362. different varieties over a 2-year period, J.
Sci. Food Agric. 90 (2010) 2366–2378.
[12] Treutter D., Managing phenol contents in
crop plants by phytochemical farming and [24] Chinnici F., Bendini A., Gaiani A., Riponi C.,
breeding-visions and constraints, Int. J. Mol. Radical scavenging activities of peels and
Sci. 11 (2010) 807–857. pulps from cv. Golden Delicious apples as
related to their phenolic composition, J.
[13] Treutter D., Biosynthesis of phenolic com- Agric. Food Chem. 52 (2004) 4684–4689.
pounds and its regulation in apple, Plant
Growth Regul. 34 (2001) 71–89. [25] Slatnar A., Petkovsek M.M., Halbwirth H.,
Stampar F., Stich K., Veberic R., Response of
[14] Veberic R., Trobec M., Herbinger K., Hofer M., the phenylpropanoid pathway to Venturia
Grill D., Stampar F., Phenolic compounds in inaequalis infection in maturing fruit of 'Brae-
some apple (Malus domestica Borkh) culti- burn' apple, J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 85
vars of organic and integrated production, J. (2010) 465–472.
Sci. Food Agric. 85 (2005) 1687–1694.
[26] Petkovsek M.M., Stampar F., Veberic R.,
[15] Anon., Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 Increased phenolic content in apple leaves
of 28 June 2007 on organic production and infected with the apple scab pathogen, J.
labelling of organic products and repealing Plant Pathol. 90 (2008) 49–55.
[27] Carbonaro M., Mattera M., Polyphenoloxi- organic cultivation on the levels of phenolics,
dase activity and polyphenol levels in organi- peroxidase and capsidiol in sweet peppers,
cally and conventionally grown peach J. Sci. Food Agric. 88 (2008) 770–777.
(Prunus persica L., cv. Regina bianca) and
[30] Matsuki M., Regulation of plant phenolic
pear (Pyrus communis L., cv. Williams), Food
synthesis: From biochemistry to ecology and
Chem. 72 (2001) 419–424.
evolution, Aust. J. Bot. 44 (1996) 613–634.
[28] Young J.E., Zhao X., Carey E.E., Welti R.,
[31] Yuri J.A., Neira A., Quilodran A., Motomura
Yang S.S., Wang W.Q., Phytochemical phe-
Y., Palomo I., Antioxidant activity and total
nolics in organically grown vegetables, Mol.
phenolics concentration in apple peel and
Nutr. Food Res. 49 (2005) 1136–1142.
flesh is determined by cultivar and agrocli-
[29] Amor F.M. del, Serrano-Martinez A., Fortea matic growing regions in Chile, J. Food
I., Nunez-Delicado E., Differential effect of Agric. Environ. 7 (2009) 513–517.