Prior to April 8's meeting, Duke Student Government Senate originally posted a resolution to their Google Drive advocating for a universal satisfactory grading system.
Original Title
Original DSG Resolution on Duke's Grading Policy
Prior to April 8's meeting, Duke Student Government Senate originally posted a resolution to their Google Drive advocating for a universal satisfactory grading system.
Prior to April 8's meeting, Duke Student Government Senate originally posted a resolution to their Google Drive advocating for a universal satisfactory grading system.
A RESOLUTION OF THE DUKE STUDENT GOVERNMENT
WHEREAS on Tuesday, March 10, 2020, Duke University suspended in-person classes in favor of online learning, as a result of concerns and subsequent social distancing regulations regarding COVID-19; and
WHEREAS on Wednesday, March 18, 2020, Duke established a new grading policy for the Spring 2020 semester, permitting students to take courses as Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory with the ability to opt-in to receive grades; and
WHEREAS the deadline to choose whether or not to receive a grade for credit was set as April 22, before students take final exams or receive final grades; and
WHEREAS peer institutions have established differing policies to that of Duke; and
WHEREAS several student petitions, organized by Duke students, have advocated for different grading policies, such as Universal Pass or Default Pass with the option to receive grades; and
WHEREAS the Duke Student Government created a survey to assess student support for varying policies, in addition to student stressors/barriers, and the implication of not receiving grades; and
WHEREAS the survey received 3,230 unique responses, representing 49.00% of the student body; and
WHEREAS from the survey, students experiencing one or more environmental barriers and/or stressors overwhelmingly expressed support for alternative policies; and
WHEREAS of alternate policies, students most preferred a “Universal Satisfactory,” though several expressed concerns about not receiving grades; and
WHEREAS Duke Student Government seeks to both convey student voices, while also empowering those whose experiences or circumstances may not be as privileged, as indicated by the data on the survey; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF DUKE STUDENT GOVERNMENT, that we support a change from the existing grading policy to a Universal Satisfactory policy; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if such a policy change is not possible, we advocate for an
DSG-R-2020-04-08
extension in the deadline to opt-in to receive grades under the current policy, such that students will be able to see their final grades before deciding whether or not to take a course as S/U or for a grade (similar to a few of our peer institutions); and,
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED, that if such options remain unfeasible, the Duke Student Government advocates for a change from the existing policy to a Universal Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory policy, much like many of our peer institutions; and
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED, that Duke University take every step within its capacity to ensure and protect the well-being, safety, and health of its students, faculty, and staff; and
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED, that we call on Duke’s graduate schools to be accommodating towards students’ circumstances this semester, setting an example for other schools to follow; and
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED, that we respectfully request a response from administration—namely Provost Kornbluth and/or Vice Provost Bennett—as to why such changes are not possible for each of the aforementioned recommendations that they choose not to take.
Introduced by (in Alphabetical Order by First Name) Senator Andrew Weatherman, Academic Affairs; Ad-Hoc Senator Bennett David, Academic Affairs; Senator Christina Wang, Equity and Outreach; Vice President Manish Kumar, Academic Affairs; Senator Nehal Jain, Equity and Outreach; Ad-Hoc Senator Nitin Subramanian, Campus Life; Ad-Hoc Senator Shirley Mathur, Equity and Outreach; Senator Shrey Majmudar, Academic Affairs