Professional Documents
Culture Documents
189]
404 © 2018 Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijpmonline.org on Saturday, July 14, 2018, IP: 202.177.173.189]
PGLs are classified according to various sites from which they The malignant PGL is very rare. It is important to detect it earlier
arise. because the treatment modality and prognosis of benign and
malignant PGL differs and defines the prognosis of the patient. This
According to the 10% rule, only 10% of PGLs are malignant. case is a very rare presentation of PGL arising from the porta hepatis
Currently, there are no reliable markers for metastatic disease and metastasizing to portal lymph nodes and bilateral ovaries.
in PGL. Mitotic activity, vascular invasion, and necrosis are
histological features that are suggestive, but not diagnostic, of Financial support and sponsorship
malignant behavior.[6] GAPP score is helpful for predicting the Nil.
course of PGL. The only way to diagnose malignancy is the
presence of metastases. Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Pheochromocytomas and extra‑adrenal PGLs have unpredictable
behavior and usually show late metastasis. Thus, patients with REFERENCES
PGL have to be followed up for a long time because metastatic
disease or recurrence can appear even after decades free of disease. 1. Higa B, Kapur U. Malignant paraganglioma of the pancreas. Pathology
The most promising diagnostic/predictive marker for metastatic 2012;44:53‑5.
PGL so far seems to be the expression of the hypoxia‑inducible 2. Sclafani LM, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Extraadrenal retroperitoneal
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology ¦ Volume 61 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2018 405
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijpmonline.org on Saturday, July 14, 2018, IP: 202.177.173.189]
paragangliomas: Natural history and response to treatment. Surgery High frequency of SNAIL‑expressing cells confirms and predicts
1990;108:1124‑9. metastatic potential of phaeochromocytoma. Endocr Relat Cancer
3. Hitanant S, Sriumpai S, Na‑Songkla S, Pichyangkula C, Sindhavananda K, 2009;16:1211‑8.
Viranuvatti V, et al. Paraganglioma of the common hepatic duct. Am J 8. Kimura N, Takayanagi R, Takizawa N, Itagaki E, Katabami T, Kakoi N, et al.
Gastroenterol 1984;79:485‑8. Pathological grading for predicting metastasis in phaeochromocytoma
4. Sarma DP, Rodriguez FH Jr., Hoffmann EO. Paraganglioma of the hepatic and paraganglioma. Endocr Relat Cancer 2014;21:405‑14.
duct. South Med J 1980;73:1677‑8. 9. Zografos GN, Vasiliadis G, Farfaras AN, Aggeli C, Digalakis M. Laparoscopic
5. Miller TA, Weber TR, Appelman HD. Paraganglioma of the gallbladder. surgery for malignant adrenal tumors. JSLS 2009;13:196‑202.
Arch Surg 1972;105:637‑9. 10. Lai EW, Joshi BH, Martiniova L, Dogra R, Fujisawa T, Leland P, et al.
6. Rosai J. Adrenal and other paraganglia. In: Ackerman’s Surgical Overexpression of interleukin‑13 receptor‑alpha2 in neuroendocrine
Pathology. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 1115‑47. malignant pheochromocytoma: A novel target for receptor directed
7. Häyry V, Salmenkivi K, Arola J, Heikkilä P, Haglund C, Sariola H, et al. anti‑cancer therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:2952‑7.
406 Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology ¦ Volume 61 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2018
Copyright of Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology is the property of Wolters Kluwer
India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.