White Paper

Digital twins
revolutionize
shipbuilding
 White Paper

A digital twin is a digital, or virtual, replication of just about any physical thing or
place — a system, a product, a part, an office or even a shipyard. The technology
has the potential to modernize and optimize shipbuilding, or really, any complex,
manually intensive business involving highly specialized systems that require ongoing
inspections and maintenance. Think of just about any manufacturing business, as
well as those in the metals, mining and utilities industries, and digital twin technology
could have a transformative impact.

When it comes to building a submarine or a ship, two types of digital twins can be
created: a prototype twin and an operational twin. Each provides slightly different
benefits, but both are equally valuable in de-risking and shortening the timeline of a
ship build.

The prototype twin involves using digital twin technologies to design, simulate and
optimize the build of a physical system before it is physically built. The operational
twin replicates an existing physical system (physical twin) with a digital version. Data
captured by the physical twin can duplicate events seen in the digital twin.

Let’s take a closer look at each to understand how shipbuilding organizations can use
digital twin technologies to solve real-world industry challenges.

The digital prototype

Some would suggest that the prototype twin is just an extension or a compilation
of digital design. Although there is some truth to that — the prototype twin aims to
glue together all the 3D designs of a platform, for example — there is also much,
much more to the technology. A prototype twin at the scale of an engine can provide
some very valuable data. That data can help predict vital metrics, such as mean time
between failures, based on sub-assembly failure rates and failure dynamics.

For example, an existing physical jet engine combustor being considered for inclusion
in a prototype jet engine will have specific failure data. This data might suggest
that the combustor has a mean time between failure of 68,735 hours. The data
collected from failed combustors might also define failure dynamics, such as the
most probable location of material degradation leading to failure. This behavioral
data can be tagged to different parts of the engine’s prototype twin and then used to
simulate a failure. Next, artificial intelligence (AI) can be used on the prototype twin
to determine the predicted outcome from the failure of that combustor.

2
 White Paper

Figure 1 shows AI’s prediction that 1 minute and 16 seconds after the combustor has
failed, the temperature on the outside of the turbine has increased from 164 degrees
Celsius to 456 degrees — leading to catastrophic failure. Results from this engine
simulation might, for example, lead to the installation of thicker combustor insulation
to delay the heat increase so that the engine can be safely shut down.

Figure 1. With AI, a prototype twin can predict possible outcomes in an engine simulation

A prototype twin is not just a collection of 2D and 3D models. It also can provide the
ability to overlay vital statistical and behavioral data to simulate functionality. It can
act as though it is the real physical thing, but it has the advantage of being able to
simulate scenarios that would be far too dangerous to simulate on a physical system
or platform.

It is easy to see how significant value in the design phase of a system such as
an engine can be delivered using a digital prototype. Now think about that value
applied to the scale of a ship. Think about the potential of simulating all the different
scenarios that can happen aboard a ship. The potential to avoid rework is enormous.
Instead of your learning about design mistakes after the ship has been built, the
prototype twin can discover those flaws long before the first piece of metal is cut.

Building safety into a ship at the start

Discovering design flaws and simulating various scenarios early on is crucial,
especially when it comes to safety. Consider how a prototype twin can be applied
for fire retardation and suppression. In 1998 the HMAS Westralia caught fire, taking
the lives of four Australian Naval personnel. That tragedy was caused by the use of
improper fuel line hosing that burst, spraying fuel onto hot surfaces and igniting

3
 White Paper

a large section of the engine room. And although a prototype twin could not have
helped avoid the improper use of parts, it could have helped with fire simulation had
the technology been developed when the Westralia was designed.

Through the use of a digital prototype and the cognitive power of AI, the subsequent
spread of fire from an ignition — as happened on the Westralia — can be predicted.
Such simulation is not just based on the physical layout of the ship but also on a
number of other factors such as compartment materials, flammable substances,
ventilation, installed fire-suppression systems and so forth. Physical and behavioral
attributes are tagged to the twin, so the AI layer can determine factors such as how
long it will take to burn through different materials.

Figure 2 illustrates the following: The simulation has determined there are eight
walls vulnerable to fire that should be better insulated. It has also determined
that four zones are not protected by fire suppression (sprinklers), which should also
be addressed.

Figure 2. Simulation of fire spread and identification of weak points using a digital twin and AI

3D digital twin views can also provide significant value by visually representing the
potential impact of heat within a ship. The simulation can also show a color-coded
view inside a ship compartment and represents in red anything that has potential to
get hot. This can give a valuable visual on two things: first, a view on where insulation
might need to be added, and second, a view on how heating in a ship might affect
the crew’s health and safety.

4
 White Paper

While we’ve discussed a couple of examples of how a digital twin can help in
the design/prototyping phase of a ship build, there are so many other valuable
applications of a digital twin in this phase. You could add even more experiences with
augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), for instance. It all comes down to
imagination.

Increase or Reduce OPTIMIZED LAYOUT

Coverage Access points: 27
Cabline: 642 meters
Ship coverage: 78%
Cost: $283,787

Example 1. Ship Wi-Fi modeling with the ability to increase and decrease coverage to control cost

The birth of the virtual maintenance engineer

It’s clear that a prototype twin can accelerate the design phase of a ship build
by dramatically reducing rework and manual simulations. The operational digital
twin, however, has the potential to be even more valuable as simulation based on
predicted data.

In this case, AI is no longer required, because sensors can capture actual, working
data from the physical twin. The entire digital twin can be lit up with information
that’s collected from thousands of sensors aboard a ship. This can create a 3D
dashboard of information, identifying a vast number of events, interactions and
issues happening on board the vessel in real time.

To take it up another notch, one could put on a VR headset and walk around the
digital twin of a vessel to view the events, interactions and issues (virtually) exactly
as they are happening in the physical world. That is extremely powerful, as it can
provide visual and dimensional context to a mechanical issue.

If we wanted to simplify this, we could just provide collected sensor data in the
form of a dashboard on a PC. An individual could then drill down through sensor
information from a web application. To expedite root cause analysis, we could overlay
that sensor data onto the digital twin and, through the use of VR, provide a view
that has the added benefit of visual context, thus giving rise to the birth of a “virtual
maintenance engineer.”

5
 White Paper

Figure 3. VR view (3D scan) of a ship compartment within the digital twin showing a real-time
sensor data overlay collected from the physical twin

As shown in Figure 3, a virtual maintenance engineer can use a VR headset to

navigate the digital twin and view a 3D scan of a compartment and real-time data
that’s collected from the physical twin. This can provide the engineer with visual
context to understand what an issue might be; in this case, a coolant flow issue is
raising the temperature of a diesel generator. Although there would most likely be an
engineer attending to the issue on the physical twin, a virtual engineer who may have
subject matter expertise could be in another location viewing the same interaction
within the digital twin. Not only can the view provide key sensor data from systems
and equipment within the compartment, but also, the virtual engineer can pull in
sensor data from other parts of the ship as necessary.

Similar to a digital prototype, the use cases for a digital twin are vast. In the previous
paper on how AR can be used in shipbuilding, we highlighted the use of AR for
quality inspections. To take that use case one step further, inspection data — including
objective quality evidence (OQE), such as photos, videos and inspection reports —
could be attached to specific locations on a digital twin so that an individual using
an AR device such as a headset could walk into a ship compartment on the physical
twin and instantly view locations of where OQE has been attached to the digital twin
(seen as red dots in Figure 4). That way, the individual can view the various OQE and
results of quality inspections as they view the physical system. Dots could be turned
green when the issue has been addressed, allowing for engineers to walk around the
ship fixing red dot issues and making them green. Talk about gamification!

6
 White Paper

Figure 4. View of the physical twin through an AR device showing locations of OQE attached to
the digital twin

A digital twin is so much more than a collage of pretty pictures and actually could
be the most powerful asset an organization owns. However, there are challenges to
overcome to get it right. As you can see in Figure 5, there is so much valuable data
that can be captured in a digital twin. Operational history alone could quickly fill your
IT department’s servers. In fact, when an F-35 flies for one hour it can produce two
terabytes of flight information. That’s enough to fill the average home’s backup drive.

Figure 5. Information that can be captured in a digital twin

The biggest challenge with a digital twin is extracting important information from
the data before loading it into the digital twin. Data on its own is not all that useful,
but when data is processed, interpreted, organized, structured or presented so as
to make it meaningful or useful, it becomes information. For the F-35 example, that
means converting two terabytes of data into two megabytes of information. That
would either mean manually looking through approximately 150 million pages of
data to get the information required or using advanced technologies such as high-
performance computing (HPC), AI, big data and analytics to extract it.

7
 White Paper

So how do you create and capture a digital twin? Unfortunately, the answer isn’t
“buy an application and it will magically appear.” It takes time and investment, but
the return will be significant, especially when done early in the design phase. There
are some tried-and-tested approaches to building digital twins, such as DXC’s Digital
Twin Runtime Starter Kit. The starter kit is more of a process than a single explicit
technology, and it requires a solid understanding of what it is the organization wants
to derive from the twin, i.e., what information is required to make valuable decisions.

Gone are the days when the digital twin was just a great concept. A digital twin is
now real and is providing manufacturing organizations with the ability to reduce
significant costs by minimizing rework. Unlike a lot of other technologies, it also
provides value across the life of the program. The earlier it is deployed, the more
value a digital twin will provide. A conservative estimate on a $10 billion program
could equate to $50 million in savings from an effectively instantiated digital twin
and a well-architected digital framework or thread. That’s a lot of peanuts and well
worth a serious discussion.

About the author

Bernard Ash was formerly the chief technologist for Aerospace and Defense at DXC
Technology in Australia and New Zealand. With over 15 years’ experience in the
industry, Bernard helps DXC’s aerospace and defense clients manage their digital
transformation.

Learn more at www.dxc.technology/AandD

Get the insights that matter.

www.dxc.technology/optin

About DXC Technology

As the world’s leading independent, end-to-end IT services company, DXC Technology (NYSE: DXC) leads digital
transformations for clients by modernizing and integrating their mainstream IT, and by deploying digital solutions
at scale to produce better business outcomes. The company’s technology independence, global talent, and
extensive partner network enable 6,000 private and public-sector clients in 70 countries to thrive on change.
DXC is a recognized leader in corporate responsibility. For more information, visit www.dxc.technology and
explore thrive.dxc.technology, DXC’s digital destination for changemakers and innovators.

© 2019 DXC Technology Company. All rights reserved. CP_1045a-20. May 2019