Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elizabeth K. Roux
diagnosis, proceeding with planning and implementing nursing interventions and culminating in
the evaluation of the effectiveness of the interventions. (Victor, 2017, p. 237.) Nursing judgment
is a skill that every nurse has to use in his or her daily practice to make decisions effectively for
the patient’s best interest. “Knowledge development in clinical practice requires experiential
teaching and learning through facilitated, situated cognition with reflection.” (Kavanagh,
Szweda, 2017, p. 57.) Clinical nursing judgment is not something that can be taught in a
classroom. Through clinical experience, students gain the hands-on skills needed to make sound
judgments for the healing advancement of patients in a health care facility. Becoming a nurse is
much more than learning skills, medications, and procedures. The hands on experiences with
real patients are how students learn the process of nursing judgment in the clinical setting.
Clinical nursing judgment is important in making decisions based on patient care and
safety. “There is a need for nursing education globally to assist nursing students in developing
the skills of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment. Developing these skills
will require that nursing students develop the ability to: (a) analyze collected data (critical
thiking), (b) apply reasoning to the data obtained (clinical reasoning), and (c) appropriately act
based on the specific situation (clinical judgment).” (Sommers, 2019, p. 91.) Having good
clinical nursing judgment is so important because nurses need to know how to react when
something doesn’t go according to the care plan. Taking care of a patient is more than passing
3
medications and charting, it is assessing the patient and learning what is their baseline, so when
Nursing judgment is severely lacking in new graduate nurses today. According to a study
done in 2017 by Joan M. Kavanagh and Christine Szweda at the Cleveland Clinic, new data
suggest that we are losing ground in the quest for entry-level competency. Graduates often are
underprepared to operate in the complex field of professional practice where increased patient
acuity and decreased length of stay, coupled with a lack of deep learning in our academic nursing
programs, have exacerbated a crisis in competency. New graduate baccalaureate nurses are
expected to have a high level of clinical competency, but they are underprepared due to the lack
of experience during the rigorous four or five year programs. The clinical portion of the
curriculum often takes a backseat to the demands of the course work required. Clinical situations
are extremely unpredictable. Student experiences differ greatly, depending on many factors
including facilities, patient assignment, and knowledge of the clinical instructor and or the RN
Novice nurses and nurses with poor clinical judgment skills make more errors that
negatively impact patient outcomes, and the quality of patient care. Today’s nurses are expected
to have highly honed clinical judgment, yet most newly qualified nurses are ill-prepared for their
work. “They have not been clinically or educationally fully prepared for the demand for health
care and the greater accountability” that increased over time. (vanGraan, 2016, p. 281.)
Collaborative dialogue between students, educators and clinical mentors during patient
interaction is a tool to develop a nursing student’s ability to think critically, reflect, link concepts,
Personal Experience
student, and in my role as a nurse’s aide at a local hospital. A few weeks ago at work, I was
taking 4:00 PM vitals on all of the patients who were wearing telemetry monitors. I went into the
room of an older female patient, and took her blood pressure on the Dinamap. The patient was
talking to me and her friend as the cuff was inflating. The machine beeped, and her pressure read
189/92. I asked the patient if her blood pressures normally run that high, and she replied that no
they didn’t, but she had been under a lot of stress lately. I told her that I was going to take it
again with the Dinamap and see if the pressure changed. The blood pressure was still upwards of
180/90, with the rest of her vital signs being normal. I told her I would be going to let her nurse
know, and I would probably be back in to take it with a manual cuff and stethoscope. The RN
was notified, and she gave me instructions to take it manually and to come back and tell her if it
was still high. The blood pressure was taken manually, and it was around the same as the first
two, still over 180/90. I reported this to the RN, and she said that the patient had a medication
ordered PRN for high blood pressures, and she would administer that dose immediately.
Using clinical nursing judgment, I was able to identify that this patient’s blood pressures
were out of normal range for a small, white female, with no other risk factors. I also made sure to
ask the patient what her baseline pressures normally read. I didn’t trust the first pressure reading,
so I took it again, and then a third time manually just to make sure that it wasn’t a false reading,
or technological error. I made sure to let the RN know that her patient was having abnormal
blood pressure readings three times in a row, and the RN used her clinical nursing judgment to
administer a PRN medication that would bring her pressures down to baseline.
5
References
Perspectives, 38(2), 57–62.
Practice, 30, 91–100.
Van Graan, A. C., Williams, M. J., & Koen, M. P. (2016). Professional nurses understanding of
Victor, J., Ruppert, W., & Ballasy, S. (2017). Examining the Relationships Between Clinical
236–239.