Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper describes the operation and control resource in some locations, capable of generating electricity
methodologies for a grid-scale BESS designed to mitigate the with no fuel cost or associated air pollution. The total
negative impacts of wind integration, while improving overall installed wind capacity is on track to surpass 200GW
power distribution system efficiency and operation. The worldwide in 2011. For comparison, a very large coal or
fundamentals of wind power integration and BESS technology nuclear power facility is typically on the order of 1GW.
are presented below, followed by specific considerations in the The major challenge of wind integration is often related to
control features of wind plants coupled BESS installations. transporting power to cities and factories from the remote
The wind-coupled BESS systems described in this paper locations where wind power is often most abundant. Even
utilize the XP-Dynamic Power Resource (XP-DPR), a when transmission capacity is available, wind power can place
megawatt-scale integrated BESS developed for renewable stresses on the power system due to its intermittency. Figure
energy applications, manufactured by Xtreme Power in Kyle, 1Fig. 1 depicts wind speeds and power system load over the
TX. course of a two-week period, and shows that there is often not
a desirable correlation between wind and system load. On a
II. WIND POWER INTEGRATION small power system, such as those of the Hawaiian islands,
Undesirable impacts on the grid will be felt as such large fluctuations can be beyond the ramping capabilities
windpenetration levels increase, both by the utilites and the of the diesel generators that currently supply upwards of 90%
customers of electric retail service. Wind generation is of the island’s electricity. Wind power fluctuations could
growing more prevalent in the Smart Grid and wind result in deviations in frequency and voltage, and even
generation is a key element in the global move toward blackouts in severe cases when the wind resources are located
increased use of renewable energy. In the U.S., increased on small, remote power systems. BESS can address these
pervasiveness in wind generation capacity is being driven, in issues, charging and discharging at sub-second timescales to
part, by targets established under the auspices of the buffer changes in the wind and the state of the transmission
Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) [4]. Renewable system. To meet the 40% RPS chosen by the people of
Portfolio Standards are now on the law books of 30 states, as Hawaii, the Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO) has instated
well as in various nations in Europe, Asia, and South America. requirements in their power purchase agreements with
These regulations require the increased development and renewable energy developers that effectively necessitate
adoption of renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, energy storage at most large generation sites.
small hydro, and geothermal energy for electricity generation.
Many in the renewable energy community consider these III. ESS CONTROL FEATURES TO ENABLE HIGHER WIND
regulations a vital support for the increased development of PENETRATION LEVELS
clean energy sources, and credit them with helping to move A. Rate Variation Control
new technologies down the development curve towards During wind-coupled operation, the BESS must counteract quick
making them cost competitive with fossil fuels. changes in output power to ensure that the facility delivers ramp rates
Much of the new renewable energy slated to come on-line is deemed acceptable to the system operator. Allowable ramp rates are
certain to come from wind, a relatively mature technology typically specified by the utility in kilowatts per minute (kW/min),
benefitting from decades of research, development, and and are a common feature of new wind power purchase agreements
commercial installation experience. Wind is an inexhaustible between utilities and independent power producers.
Note that the ramp rate refers only to real power, and that
B. Frequency Response
the reactive power capabilities of the BESS can be dispatched
simultaneously and independently to achieve other power Even with ramp-rate control, there are still going to be
system goals. occasional frequency deviations on the system. By limiting
Ramp rate control (or equivalently rate variation control) the ramp rates of power from the Wind/BESS combination,
and it is intended to be applied for smoothing real power other generators have an easier task in matching generation to
fluctuations from an associated wind park. It also can operate load in real-time. The result is improved frequency regulation
to produce or consume VArs for the purpose of voltage on the power system, even with large intermittent generation
regulation as a secondary function but the primary function is assets present.
ramp rate control of the real power output of a wind park. In extreme events, such as a loss of generation or large
Positive power out of the DPR discharges the battery and load on the system, there are going to be frequency deviations.
injects power into the network while negative power out The power output of the BESS is programmed to respond to
charges the battery and absorbs power from the network frequency deviation in a manner similar to the droop control
Figure 3 depicts the operation of a BESS smoothing the that is commonly installed on AGC equipped thermal
volatile power output of a wind farm. This behavior translates generation units [6]. Equation 1 characterizes the frequency
to a significant reduction in wear and tear on the diesel droop response behavior of a thermal unit with a governor
generators supplying the rest of the grid, and helps the thermal using proportional control with a gain of 1/R, where R is
units maintain power balance and the system electrical expressed as a percentage. Equation 2 uses the computed
frequency. It is typically the case that the specifics of the Percent R to determine the real power response to a frequency
thermal units on the system will be a major factor in event, with units of kilowatts.
determining the allowable ramp-rates for the wind asset.
Ramp-rate variation control is often referred to as smoothing.
Changes in the wind park MW output will cause an (1)
immediate and opposite change in the BESS output. Factors
that can limit the real power output include the maximum
power generation/absorption of the BESS, battery state of (2)
charge, BESS current limit and bus voltage magnitude.
One important factor that needs to be considered when where is steady-state speed at no load, is steady-
implementing a power variability control, is keeping the state speed at full load, and is the nominal or rated speed of
battery at an appropriate level of charge. The power output of the generator. In the BESS controller, this control function
a wind farm does not necessarily consist of an equal number generates a new kilowatt command for the PCS every 10
of upward and downward deviations, so the battery could have milliseconds, ensuring considerably improved frequency
a tendency to discharge or charge outside of its desired stability on island power systems.
operating range. In order to avoid this, a biasing algorithm is
included as part of the ramp control algorithm.
4
V. REFERENCES
[1] J. Eyer and G. Corey, (2010, Feb.) “Energy Storage for
the Electricity Grid” Sandia Nat’l Labs Publications
[Online]. Available:
http://www.sandia.gov/ess/publications/pubslist_05.html
[2] Energy Storage Association, Technology Comparisons
[Online] Available:
http://www.electricitystorage.org/ESA/technologies/
[3] N. Miller, D. Manz, J. Roedel, P. Marken, and E.
Kronbeck, “Utility scale battery energy storage systems”
in Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting,
Minneapolis, MN, Jul. 2010.
[4] J. Eyer and G. Corey, (2010, Feb.) “Energy Storage for
the Electricity Grid” Sandia Nat’l Labs Publications
[Online]. Available:
http://www.sandia.gov/ess/publications/
pubslist_05.html
[5] U.S. DOE - "20% Wind Energy by 2030", July 2008.
[6] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, New
York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp. 589-594