Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
i
d
a
d
GENERALIDADES PCBC
e
s
P
C
B
C
3
What is Block Cave Mining
Cave mining refers to all mining
operations in which the ore body
caves naturally after undercutting the
base. The caved material is
recovered using draw points.
(Laubscher, 1994)
Undercut
Draw Bell
Extraction Level
4
Mines
Known operating and planned block and
panel caving mines
Desert Rose
Pampa de Pongo
Rosario Project
Pampa Escondida
Los Azules
1.29
5
Typical applications of the software
Initial conceptual studies SLC BC
Compare block caving to other methods
Pre-Feasibility studies vs
One lift vs two, shape, size etc
Feasibility studies
Detailed layouts
Initial production start up
How to get the tons going?
Routine production
How to meet the forecasts?
Transitions
Open pit to underground
One block cave lift to another
6
Production scheduling vs Development scheduling
Development Schedules Production Schedules
Tonnage (Mt)
6,000
Concept studies
600
5,000
500
4,000
400
300 3,000
2,000
Best elevation
200
100 1,000
- -
2560
2620
2680
2740
2800
2860
2920
2980
3040
3100
3160
3220
3280
3340
3400
3460
3520
3580
3640
Potential of block caving Elevation
ORE BODY
L1
Palabora Mining
L2
System configurations 10
Where/When in project life cycle?
9,000
$, Dens, grades etc 900
800
8,000
7,000
Tonnage (Mt)
6,000
600
5,000
500
One column 400
4,000
3,000
from Block 300
200 2,000
model 100
-
1,000
-
2560
2620
2680
2740
2800
2860
2920
2980
3040
3100
3160
3220
3280
3340
3400
3460
3520
3580
3640
Elevation
Footprint application…
-
50
100
250
150
200
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2680 2320
2725 2380
2770 2440
2815 2500
2560
2860
2620
2905
2680
2950
2740
2995
2800
Tons
Tons
3040
2860
Elevation
Elevation
3085 2920
3130 2980
$val
$val
3175 3040
3220 3100
3265 3160
3310 3220
3355 3280
3400 3340
-
-
500
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2,000
2,500
1,000
1,400
1,800
1,200
1,600
2320
2365
2410
2455
2500
2545
2590
2635
2680
Seq1
2725
2770
2815
2860
Footprint analysis using a simple schedule
Elevation
Seq2
2905
2950
2995
3040
3085
3130
3175
3220
3265
3310
3355
13
Seq, NPV , etc
$, Dens, etc
upper level
adjusted for
Block model
Mining Factors
Footprint
Area + Elev
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
505-305
505-305
525-325
525-325
545-345
545-345
565-365
565-365
585-385
Footprint analysis combining two levels
585-385
605-405 605-405
625-425 625-425
645-445 645-445
665-465 665-465
685-485 685-485
705-505 705-505
Tonnage
725-525 725-525
Dollar value
745-545 745-545
765-565 765-565
785-585 785-585
805-605 805-605
825-625 825-625
845-645 845-645
Lift1
Lift1
865-665 865-665
885-685 885-685
905-705
Lift2
905-705
Lift2
14
15
Freeport GBC
Large new project
Open pit / block cave interaction
Multiple mining panels
Mining sequence and undercut length
Chuquicamata Underground
PCBC – PC Block Caving
Introducing PC-BC
PC-BC is a tool for use by planning engineers for use in feasibility studies as well as in operating mines. It allows a numerical model to
be set up which subsequently allows the draw columns above draw points to simulated. By doing this, we are able to compute mineable
reserves for a variety of scenarios as well as produce production schedules giving tons, grade and other economic information. Features
of PC-BC include:
Sophisticated empirical mixing models allowing for vertical and horizontal mixing as well as the mixing which results from toppling or
sliding of material close to surface.
Definition of mineable reserves using best height of draw technique which allows for easy delineation of practical footprints as well
as sensitivity studies of price and mining cost variations
Generation of numerous production schedules to study the interaction of the key scheduling parameters, such as total production
rates, rate of commissioning of new draw points, draw point maturity curves (or Production Rate curves per draw point) and cave
draw down scenarios.
In addition the above tools, the following applications are also available if required:
Foot Print Finder. This enables a quick study of different footprints at different elevations, before a more detailed footprint with
explicit draw points is set up in PC-BC
CMS. This is essentially a daily draw order production system. It monitors daily actual tonnages and status per draw point and uses
this to produce daily draw orders which can be fed to an LHD dispatch system
LSQ. This is a Least Squares draw point sample analysis tool which enables calibration of draw columns against actual measured
sample grades.
A very practical interface with Microsoft Excel which allows concurrent analysis of results in Excel.
To date, PC-BC has been used all over the world on a variety of Copper, Gold, Diamond and Asbestos operations and has been well
tested over its 13 year history.
General PC-BC Applications
Block cave modeling
Footprint optimization
Production planning
Production scheduling optimization
Reserves reconciliation (LSQ)
Production system (CMS – Daily order tool)
Convergence monitoring (Geotechnical tool)
Geological observation (Geological tool)
Agenda for PCBC training
Block Model
Import Block Model
Display
Prepare special model for PCBC
Setup to rock type, resource, density, etc.
General Definition
Rock Code
Grade Element
Triangulation
Import surface and solid from DXF
Create surface
Display options
Agenda for PCBC training
Footprint Finder
Introduction
Revenue model preparations
Input and output sheets
Footprint Evaluation from a surface
PC-BC Modeling
Setup PCBC workspace
Block Caving Model
Slice file construction
Selection options
Agenda for PCBC training
Mixing Model
Introduction about Mixing algorithm
Pre-vertical Mixing
Toppling
Sequential mixing
Best Height of Draw
Economic parameters
Calculate economic value
Buckets
Transfer data from Excel to PCBC
Edit Bucket
Display Options
Use the “map” option interface with Excel
Agenda for PCBC training
Production Schedule
Sequence definition
Production rate curves definition
Draw point Status
Development rates
Production Target
Draw Method
Reports from Production schedule
Playback
Advanced Training
Sensitive analysis using different:
Draw Point spacing
Geometry cone definition
Best height of draw to define the mineable reserves with sensitive analysis using different prices or cost
Redefine footprint limit according to the new economic values
How to smooth the height of draw result
Production Schedule
Define production rate based on fragmentation information according to:
Small & intermediate size → good fragmentation → increase production rate
Large & oversize → poor fragmentation → decrease production rate
Advanced reports options
Using Optimization
Define production scheduler using LINDO option
Maximize the sum of NPV values per draw point
Using constraints as:
Minimum and maximum tons
Neighbour tons
Production block
Dilution
Construction of Slice File Resources
+ +
Block models Draw point locations
Note zones unique
or shared between
draw points
Draw cones
Contents:
Tons
Grades
+ = Resulting draw
Dollar value
Fracture Freq
% Fines
% Ore
columns % Unique
Overlapping draw cones
30
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
i
d
a
d
e
PCBC Training
s
P
C
B
C
General Setup
Create a New Project
File → New → Project
Create a New Project…
Preliminary definition
1. Grade Elements
Format Other Profiles Grade Names
Preliminary definition
2. Rock Code
Format Other Profiles Rock Codes
Create Database en PCBC
Workspace Create or Modify a workspace
Working with Block Model
Define Block Model
As Database As Binary File
Block Model Geometry
Z
Y
X
Block Model Geometry
Importing information to Block Model
Block Model Statistics
Min value Max value Min Row Max Row Min Col Max Col Min Level Max Level Ave(non-zero) Num(non-zero)
Standard Rock Type 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Standard Density 2.32 2.87 52 231 51 201 1 215 2.74 5,843,700
Standard Economic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0
Standard Material 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0
Standard Elevation
Standard CU -1 24.3 52 231 51 201 1 215 -0.28 4,715,676
Standard CONF -1 4 52 231 51 201 1 215 1.09 5,843,700
Standard OXIDE 1 4 52 231 51 201 1 215 3.35 5,843,700
Standard Void% -1 100 52 231 51 201 1 215 1.51 5,837,382
Advanced Profile
Block Model Statistics
Block Model
Create a new variable into block model
Block Model
Create a new variable into block model
Display Block Model information
Display variable into block model
Display- Block Outlines
Display- Values and Outlines
rockcode
grade
Revenue Factor
Revenue = Grade (%)* Revenue Factor = $/ton
Rockmass Class 5 4 3 2
ff/m 50-7 20-1.5 5-0.4 1.5-0.2
Rock size (m) 0.01-0.3 0.1-2 0.4-5 1.5-9
Isolate draw diameter
Loading width
5m
4m 9m
11.5m
11m
13m
12.5m
Rockmass strength (MRMR)
3m 6.5m 8.5m 10.5m 12m
2m 6m 8m 10m Geological structures
Join spacing
Induced stress
Maximum/Mininmum spacing of Drawzones
Loading width
5m 24-14m
4m 15-8m 20-11m 22-13m
3m 10-5m 13-7m 18-10m 21-12m
2m 9-4m 12-6m 16-9m
Area of influence(m2) 95 180 290 380
For example
RMR=66 Layout=20m x 17m
FF/M=2.2 340 m2
Loading Width=4m
Draw Cone Geometry
Height
Maximum height of column
Height
Cone angle
or inclination
Overall angle=
Cone angle +
Cone flair
Radius
Draw Cone Geometry
Inside material can POTENTIALLY report to a draw point and be mined
Outside material cannot be mined
User defined
geometry
OK OK NOT OK
(Section view)
Draw Cone Geometry - Definition
Draw cone geometry
•Depends on height
•Depends on fragmentation
•Depends on friction angle
Vertical
Hc 500
Hc/2 250
2 grados
1.5 grados
Example of Extraction and Undercut level
21.6m
Draw Cone Geometry – Example1
Incline Column Theory
Incline Column Theory
Span = 600m
Depth = 1000m
Height of cave/100 = 5
Factor=1000/600 * 5 = 8
RMR = 60 ??
Cave Angle = 80 degrees
Draw Point Type
PCBC-Project-Draw Point Type
A-Norte
INC-CW
269 dpts
573 dpts INC-N
627 dpts
EXTO INC-CE
1338 dpts 126 dpts
INC-W
395 dpts
Production Block Example
Sector4
Xcut16-20 Sector3
Xcut11-15 Sector2 Sector1
Xcut6-10 Xcut1-5
Design Criteria
Important Design Criteria for Extraction Level layout:
•Drift Spacing [a]
•Drawpoint Spacing / distance across minor apex [b]
•Distance across major apex [c]
•Trough Length [d]
•Break-away Length [e]
•Tunnel Width [f]
Malla de Extracción 15 x 20 m (Teniente)
DIMENSIONAMIENTO DE
MALLAS DE EXTRACCION,
BATEAS RECOLECTORAS Y
PILAR
CORONA PARA METODO PANEL
CAVING EN ROCA PRIMARIA,
MINA EL TENIENTE
Create layout Draw Points
1. Create a clipping polygon
2. Define a advanced profile
3. Use to create the layout
PCBC Draw Points Draw Point Utilities Generate layout in CSV file
Offset
Brow
Minor
Major
Importing Draw Points from csv
Prepare coordinates and name of the dpts in a Excel spreadsheet
Slice 3
• PCBC used 75 slice per draw point
Slice 2 • 10,000 dpts maximum per database
Slice 1
Draw Point
Block Fractions
Material shared Uniq ue M aterial
between draw not shared with
points other draw points
20%
100%
75%
Coarse Material
Fine Material
Shared Material
between neighbour
draw point
Ore or Dilution:
Grades, density and
$$ Dollar value
Unique Material
(Can only come out of
this draw point)
Draw point
Computing Block Fractions
Fractions, discreet of block
model
Fractions inside
Draw Point
3/25=12% 13/25=52%
Ultimate fractions calculations
1/25=4% 8/25=32%
Transference Block to Slice file
0.2 0.6
Block Model Copper Grade
1.2 0.8
12% 52%
12%*0.2+52%*0.6+
4% 32% 4%*1.2+32%*0.8 = 0.64
=0.64
Transfer blocks to Slice File
PCBC- Slice File - Transfer blocks to slice file
Checking the slice file
PCBC- Slice File -View/Edit Slice File
Creating slice file in 1 step
1. Create an Advanced Profile
2. Run “Build” option
T O
Legend
V Vertical mix
H Horizontal
I Inclined
Horizontal mixing minimal Yes Horizontal Near pillars and cones and between
major mining boundaries
Toppling Yes Yes Horizontal At cave surface
Rilling No Yes Horizontal At broken/solid rock interface
Regional lateral Yes Yes Horizontal Mostly at distinct interfaces (Eg
movement kimberlite pipe sides)
Cone erosion No Yes Vertical Variable (increasing) cone radius
Stagnation No No Vertical Variable (decreasing) cone radius
Fines migration Some Yes Vertical Rapid downward of fine material within a
coarser matrix
Piping No No Vertical? Small direct path for fines migration
Mud rush No No Both Fluid flow within rock matrix?
Open pit failures Some Yes Vertical Sudden major failure in a given period
Variable cave back No Yes Vertical Incremental changes to cave back as it
with time moves upwards
112
Flow modeling in PCBC
No mixing
Laubscher method
Pre-Vertical mixing
Sequential mixing and toppling
Template mixing
REBOP interface
Pre-Vertical mixing and Sequential mixing are related, but Laubscher, TM methods are
independent. REBOP interface is currently only accessible to Rio Tinto. But it is still possible
to do comparative runs of PCBC vs REBOP quite easily for small datasets.
Rebop example
Types of mixing (earlier versions)
Toppling
en superficie
Mezcla horizontal
entre puntos de
extracción
Mezcla Vertical
proceso básico de mezcla
Extracción de
tonelaje
Mixing Horizon - Fictitious, but useful
Uniform movement
assumed here
Mixing Horizon
Non-uniform movement
occurs here
composed by a vertical and
a horizontal movement
50 0
# of mixing iterations
The number of mixing iterations should be increased for smaller block sizes (in the vertical direction). For
example, 1 iteration might be sufficient for a vertical block size of 20m, while 2 or 3 iterations might be
required for the same situation with a 10m block size.
Estimation of Percentage of Dilution Entry (PDE)
The percentage of dilution entry is
computed as follows
HIZ
Where Hc
s * dcf
Hc, is the height of the draw PDE
column Hc
HIZ, is the height of
interaction zone
Dcf, is the draw control factor
s, is the swell factor MixingHorizon
HIZ
UndercutHeight
s * dcf
HIZ from ffm model
ff/m
Point Dilution Entry
Waste
HIZ is an indicator of the amount of Waste
HIZ
mixing within the draw column. Waste
Therefore affects the PDE
PDE is highly influenced by HIZ
Waste
differential draw
HIZ
Draw Control Factor (dcf)
Dcf is a measure of diferential Neighbours
dcf
0.5
0 0.1
Slices below HIZ mix
0.15 0.2
each other
Diffuse contact
Sharp contact
100
ORIGINAL ORE ORIGINAL DILUTION
90
80
70
% of Dilution
60
50 MH=200
2 Cycles
40 MH=200 MH=50
30 1 Cycle
MH=150 MH=75
20
MH=100
10
0
10
30
50
70
90
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
310
330
350
430
450
470
490
410
130
370
390
110
Height of Draw
Mixing Models in PCBC
Premixing SeqMixing
HIZ
New Approach
8
7
8
6
7 HIZ
5
6
8
. . . 4
5
. . . 3 7 8
. . . 4
2 6 7
3
5 6
HIZ 1 2
HIZ 1
4 5
3 4
2 3
time
1 2
1
1er Slice 2 Slice N-1 Slice HIZ ( premix) * esponjamiento(s) HIZ (seqmix)
Toppling applications
z
Material quebrado
H
XXX h
β α
Galería afectada por el cráter de ti AB
subsidencia
Hoek 1972
Brown & Ferguson 1979
Zona de influencia (Karzulovic & Díaz, 1992)
Caved rock
Crater
perimeter
Slide 145
Subsidence generated by El Teniente’s block and
panel caving operations, Chile
N Crater
perimeter Quebrada
Teniente
Teniente 5
Teniente 4 Pilares
Fortuna
Caved
rock
Braden Teniente
Teniente 4
Regimiento
Pipe Sub 6
Teniente
3 Isla Teniente
4 Sur
Slide 146
Toppling and subsidence
Toppling Example
Previously mined
Open Pit Marginal
material
Ore
Draw points
Toppling example - steps
Step 0 Step 1 Step 2
A Hybrid approach
Best bits and experience from previous PC-BC
Some stochastic components
Some flow elements (macro scale)
Built right into production scheduler of PC-BC
Note
As with the previous mixing in PC-BC, template mixing is NOT a gravity flow simulation or geomechanical tool.
Template mixing
Arc structure Base Frozen and Erosion Isolated
Frozen material
Depleting dpt
Template mixing test (Section)
Lower grade at base allows effects of variable cone
radius to be studied
Draw points
Some results for TM
Erosion of draw cone 300,000
Rilling 1.60000
300,000 1.40000
1.40000
1.20000 250,000
250,000
1.20000
1.00000
200,000 200,000
1.00000
Current tons Current tons
0.80000
Base tons Base tons
150,000 150,000 0.80000
CU CU
0.60000 Base Cu
Base Cu
0.60000
100,000 100,000
0.40000
0.40000
50,000 50,000
0.20000 0.20000
0 0.00000 0 0.00000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
300,000
Variable fines 1.40000
Rilling is “mid-term”
1.00000
200,000
Current tons
0.80000 Base tons
150,000 CU
0.60000 Run 7
Dilution entry is longer term (end of life of draw points)
100,000
0.40000
50,000
0.20000
0 0.00000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Template mixing examples
Sandbox with Rilling 1
Vertical and
Toppling Toppling
horizontal mixing
Rilling
DOZ 1
Draw
points
DOZ 2
Advantages of Template mixing
Fast (up to 1000 times faster than detailed particle flow models)
Versatile.
Easy to put different properties into different regions
Ability to model different mechanisms (Eg rilling, toppling, mixing)
Components separated
Can study rilling, toppling, mixing as separate entities
Could work with either regular or irregular elements (Eg blocks, cubes or draw column increments (or rings in SLC))
Scalable.
Has potential to be developed for more detailed models
REBOP interface 159
BHOD.XLS
Run Best Height of draw
During this process the program show the draw point
with different color, it means cyan color the draw
point has a positive economic value, light red the
draw point has a negative economic value.
300
250
200
Draw points
150 Total tons
Net Revenue
100
50
0
$1.10 $1.00 $0.90 $0.80
1
Period
Yr1
Days/period
365
Method
COMBO
TONS
1,460,000
New
48
Run Inputs
2 Yr2 365 COMBO 2,190,000 48
TONSLOAD1 cero
3 Yr3 365 COMBO 2,920,000 48 TONSLOAD2 TOPO
4 Yr4 365 COMBO 3,650,000 48
TONSLOAD3 MINBT
5 Yr5 365 COMBO 4,380,000 48
6 Yr6 365 COMBO 4,380,000 48 !SEQUENCE 2
7 Yr7 365 COMBO 4,380,000 10 DPT_SEQ
8 Yr8 365 COMBO 4,380,000
9 Yr9 365 COMBO 4,380,000
10
11
12
Yr10
Yr11
Yr12
365
365
365
COMBO
COMBO
COMBO
4,380,000
4,380,000
4,380,000
Input
13 Yr13 365 COMBO 4,380,000
14 Yr14 365 COMBO 4,380,000
END 54,020,000 298
0 .5
0 .4
0 .3
P ri m a ry ro c k
Table
0 .2
0 .1
0
Production Schedule Schedule
0% 12% 30% 50% 80% 100% 500%
% Draw
Bhod
PRC_INPUT Dpts
Psinfo
UCUT
Production rate curves (PRC)
The Production rate curves (PRC) can be define for each draw point or by group, in the draw point
database this ítem is in PRC field
The PRC curve is defined in XY_CURVES, like to percentage of extraction v/s Production rate (ton/
m2-day)
Sector1
400
350
300
Production rate (Tpd)
250
200 TPD
150 Average
Ave+StanDev
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
198
Cavability - Laubsher’s Method
Mining sequence (cont)
Boart Drill and Blast Schedule
End 1999 First Quater 2001
Jan 2000 Second Quater 2001
Feb 2000 Third Quater 2001
Mar 2000 Fourth Quater 2001
Apr 2000
May 2000 First Quater 2002
Second Quater 2002
21a 21 20a 20 19a 19 18a Jun 2000
18 Third Quater 2002
Jul 2000
17a Fourth Quater 2002
17 Aug 2000
16a Sep 2000 First Quater 2001
16 Oct 2000 Second Quater 2003
15a
15 Nov 2000 Third Quater 2003
14a Dec 2000
14
13a
13
12a
12
11a
11
10a 10 9a 9 8a 8 7a 7 6a 6 5a 5 4a 4 3a 3 2a 2 1a 1
21a
21
20a
19a
19 18a 18 17a 17
16a
16
15a
15
14a
14
13a
13
12a
12
11a 1
2 1a
11 2a
10a 3
4 3a
10 5 4a
9a 6 5a
9 6a
8a 7
8 7a
Año 2014
Año 2024
Año 2034
Año 2015
Año 2023
Undercut
Schedule
• Create TIN surface from active data (ie polylines just digitized)
Mostly limited
by PRC curve
PRC Limit
Some limited
by Remaining
Some limited
by PRC curve
Some limited
by Remaining
Some limited
by PRC curve
PRC Limit
Some limited
by PRC curve
PRC Limit
DPTS Actual HOD PRC Max Cap AUTO EVEN COMBO SMOOTH
1 250 400 mm/day 243 243 78 78 243
2 200 400 mm/day 243 243 146 146 146
3 100 400 mm/day 243 114 194 194 122
4 50 100 mm/day 61 - 61 61 40
5 0 100 mm/day 61 - 61 61 30
6 0 100 mm/day 61 - 61 61 20
911 600 600 600 600
Draw Function calc example Target>Capacity
TARGET 1000 tpd
DPTS Actual HOD PRC Max Cap AUTO EVEN COMBO SMOOTH
1 250 400 mm/day 243 243 250 243 243
2 200 400 mm/day 243 243 250 243 243
3 100 400 mm/day 243 243 250 243 243
4 50 100 mm/day 61 61 84 61 61
5 0 100 mm/day 61 61 83 61 61
6 0 100 mm/day 61 61 83 61 61
911 911 1,000 911 911
Example of NPV Maximization Optimized
Item Base Case Case
NPV 219,486,71 261,428,012
Net DV costs 44,055,822 37,775,780
7 Cu 0.9800 1.0007
Mo 0.0292 0.0291
Pb 0.0016 0.0016
6 wi 16.0461 16.0022
Reserves 237,007,056 208,440,656
5
237 Million tons @ 0.98 %Cu
4 1219 draw points
8
Mine capacity 12 million/year
1
2
9
NPV increased19% !
10
3
If this keyword is present, then when material is depleted (with the DEPLETE)
keyword, then detailed tonnages, grades, dilution and dollar value information
for each draw point will be dumped to separate Excel spreadsheets.
As this can substantially slow down the production scheduler, it should only be
used for "final" runs where the detailed information may be required for further
processing.
Keyword DETAIL
• Step number
• Action to take (TYPE, STATUS or NEW etc.)
• Draw point name or draw point Type
• New draw point type or new draw point status
• Additional value (floating point) for future use
235
Playback
Historical tons
display
Historical tons
display
Height of draw
Step Period Days Method Area # Ucut Ucut area Ucut tons
UCUT_HT: This keyword will specify the default height of the bottom of the undercurt zone
as measured from the draw point extraction elevation. Usually this would be in the range 15
to 30m.
UCUT_AREA: This keyword will specify an average area to be used for each draw point
which will override the draw point areas. For example, if, in a layout, the draw point areas
vary form 220 to 300, you may prefer, for undercut purposes, to replace this with a constant
area of 225m per draw point.
Keyword PB_MAX
Use this keyword to enable production blocks to be set up in the TABLE sheet. If
this keyword is not set, then it is still possible to set production block constraints
using option PBMAX in the DETAIL sheet.
Step Period Days/period Method TONS NEW NORTHPANEL CENTPANEL SOUTHPANEL END
• This keyword will allow you to temporarily increase the PRC rates form their
standard value by the scale factor specified (in the next field). For example, if you
want to temporarily increase the PRC by 20%, you would enter a value of 1.2
• This intent here is that you will increase the PRC, but keep the total tons targets
unchanged (and in line with the standard PRC). This will then provide some short
term flexibility to the SURF method to catch up to the specified surface.
• If you do not do this, then it is likely that the SURF keyword will not be effective
until you reach full production.
SURF Procedure
Prepare a “Ideal Surface” using the actual tonnage:
Take the tonnage from actual data and run production schedule using these tonnage like a
production target using a SMOOTH or POINTS and not used the PAST
Use the DUMP_HOD to get the HOD information per period
Take the HOD and create a Surface using the option (Make a TIN from HOD bucket)
If it is necesary edit the elevetion in the draw point to create the “Ideal Surface”.
Prepare a Production Schedule to Catch Up in Nov05
Use the PAST to deplete the historical information
Use the SURF in the next 4 or 5 month
Use the SMOOTH or POINT for the rest of the run.
Additional Keyword
AREA_FIX: You can set the next field equal to a fixed area and then all draw points will use
this (constant) area for PRC calculation purposes.
RESTORE: This restores the slice file PCBCCURR.SLF from the file PCBCSAVE.SLF. It is
useful when doing multiple runs and when the DEPLETE keyword is being used.
HOD_TIN: This will allow the surface to be imported back into Gemcom for proper viewing.
The file name is TIN.TRI
PROD_SUM: Allows a summary report to be generated by production block. The next filed
for this keyword can be either 1 or 2.
TMIN: This is the minimum tons per day which can be used as a lower limit for scheduled
tons per draw point. (We use tons per day, so that it can be scaled by the number of days
per period whether this is per month, quarter or year)
SECTOR_SUM: Generate a report to prodtons.xls which is similar in format and structure to
PROD_SUM. As with the PROD_SUM keyword, there are two options (1 and 2).
BEST_HOD (keyword)
• Use this option top dynamically change the maximum limiting
tonnages
• It is only necessary for runs in which toppling is being used, since, in this case, the material in one
draw point column can migrate to another draw point thus changing the available tonnages from
both draw points.
• It can also be used if using cross draw point mixing or sequential mixing where the best tons for
each draw point may change as the amount of mixing changes.
Common Block Caving and PC-BC terms
Term Explanation
HOD Height of draw
Cone Shape of draw surface above a draw point
Draw point Point at which material is extracted from draw column
LHD Load Haul Dump mining equipment
MH Mixing Horizon (PC-BC equivalent of HIZ)
HIZ
Height of interaction zone (Height above which no vertical mixing assumed)
Bucket
A memory array for storing Tons, HOD or other draw point related data in TEMPORARY
storage. Many programs read data from or write data to "buckets". There is storage
allocated for three HOD and three TONS buckets.
Common Block Caving and PC-BC terms
Term Explanation
CMS Cave Management System. A sub-system of PC-BC for daily draw order generation and management.
Slice file Central storage location for tons and gradde and other related information for each draw point.
(Usually has a .253 extension)
Production A name given to a group of draw points which will be grouped together, usually for production
block scheduling or reporting
Best HOD Usually refers to the HOD which provides the maximum dollar value, based on dollar value
information in the slice file. Also frequently used to define maximum mineable reserves.
Haircut The process of smoothing or trimming the Best HOD values to make the resulting HOD values more
achievable in practice.
PRC Production rate curve. Also referred to as a draw point maturity curve. This limits the maximum tons
per draw point per day.
AUTO A commonly used scheduling method in which maximum tons are taken from the oldest draw points
first and the newer draw points last.
Procedure to run Production scheduller with
Toppling
Prepare a new draw point database with extra draw point
Create a new Slice file
Define sequential mixing parameters and toppling angles
Create a new General parameter profile and in depletion tab active option to run with
sequential mixing and toppling
Use the nomix slice file to run
Add in the Input sheet the following keyword:
LOADMAX (Minimum tonnage to extract, for example 30% Draw)
LOADLIMIT (Maximum tonnage to extract)
Best_HOD (Calculate dynamically best HOD)
Include shut off value in the Table sheet
Others Applications in PCBC
LSQ Method for Short Term Planning
• LSQ is a tool developed as part of PC-BC module that allows to integrate actual draw point samples in
the estimation of a slice file which is ad doc for short term planning.
• Thus the short term planning model will be an arrangement of draw columns that have maintained the
original mixed slice file with draw columns that have been estimated based on the actual draw point
samples.
• LSQ computes the dispersion between the slice file and composited actual samples for a given period of
time, depending on this dispersion the draw column will maintain the slice file as the short term grade
estimator else the grade estimator will be computed using the latest composited samples.
•
• The grade estimator mechanism consists of computing a grade trend based on the last composited
samples. This trend is later used to compute the slices overlying the actual HOD.
LSQ Method
CuSam Updated
Select
Mixed
draw points
Slice file
Tons
LSQ.xls
Gn
Gk
HOD G3
<> HOD
G2
G1
Draw Column
Grade trend estimation
Grade trend estimation
Number Code HOD C:CU C:AU
Control parameters for Grade trend analysis
1 0 14.43586063 0.9859 0.522031
2 0 28.87172127 0.744902 0.341643
1 NBACK 5 3 0 43.30758286 0.784453 0.179996
2 NEXTRA 3 4 0 57.74344254 0.445857 0.307094
3 COMP_LEN 15 5 0 72.17930603 0.671945 0.359648
4 DELH 15 6 0 86.61516571 1.241583 0.624051
7 1 101.0510254 1.075189 0.609782
5 LAB 2 CU AU
8 1 115.4868851 2.025218 0.754009
6 MAXOVER 140 2 0.6 9 1 129.9227448 1.71181 0.66655
7 MAXRATIO 1.5 10 1 144.3586121 1.505684 0.870101
8 MINRATIO 0.4 11 1 158.7944794 1.213724 0.91035
2 173.7944641 1.432638 0.6
2 188.7944641 1.407444 0.6
y = -0.0017x + 1.7245
3.5 2 203.7944641 1.382251 0.6
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
Grade trend estimation
Once the estimation has been computed for the
extra composites these composites are Gk+3
Estimated Slices
converted into slice file blocks as presented in Gk+2
Gk+1
the following figure:
HOD
Control Sheet
Control parameters for Grade trend analysis
T O
Legend
V Vertical mix
H Horizontal
I Inclined
T Toppling
Caved Solid
R Rilling
I F
O Open pit failure Mixing horizon
F Fines migration
R
C Chimneying
H C
V
F Frozen
E F
E Erosion
Rilling
1.40000
1.20000 250,000
250,000
1.20000
1.00000
200,000 200,000
1.00000
Current tons Current tons
0.80000
Base tons Base tons
150,000 150,000 0.80000
CU
CU
0.60000 Base Cu
Base Cu 0.60000
100,000
100,000
0.40000 0.40000
50,000
50,000 0.20000
0.20000
0 0.00000
0 0.00000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Variable fines
300,000 1.40000
Cone base has short term effect
1.20000
250,000
Rilling is “mid-term”
1.00000
200,000
Current tons
0.80000 Base tons
150,000 CU
0.60000 Run 7
100,000
0.40000 Dilution entry is longer term (end of life
50,000
0.20000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0.00000 of draw points)
Template mixing examples
Toppling
Rilling
Draw
points DOZ 1
DOZ 2
Advantages of Template mixing
Fast (up to 1000 times faster than Rebop?)
Versatile.
Easy to put different properties into different regions
Ability to model different mechanisms (Eg rilling, toppling, mixing)
Integrated. Was able to be developed right inside the current PC-BC/GEMS system
Independent from previous mixing in PC-BC, so provides an independent evaluation
Components separated
Can study rilling, toppling, mixing as separate entities
Could work with either regular or irregular elements (Eg blocks, cubes or draw column increments)
Scalable.
Has potential to be developed for more detailed models
Template Mixing
STEP 6 STEP 10 STEP 12 STEP 13 STEP 14
Stable
Transition
Caving
Not Specified